Advertisement
Talenthouse AG

Talenthouse AG Fundamental Analysis

NEWN.SWSIX
Financial ServicesAsset Management
CHF0.94
CHF0.14(17.50%)
Swiss Market opens in 48h 54m
Advertisement

Talenthouse AG Fundamental Analysis

Talenthouse AG (NEWN.SW) shows weak financial fundamentals with a PE ratio of -13.37, profit margin of 0.00%, and ROE of -1.98%. The company generates N/A in annual revenue with N/A year-over-year growth of N/A.

Key Strengths

PEG Ratio0.32

Areas of Concern

ROE-1.98%
Operating Margin0.00%
Current Ratio0.29
We analyze NEWN.SW's fundamental strength across five key dimensions.

The stock receives a Fundamental Health Score of -245.3/100 based on profitability, valuation, growth, and balance sheet metrics. The F grade reflects weak fundamentals and significant financial concerns.

Fundamental Health Score

F
-245.3/100

We analyze NEWN.SW's fundamental strength across five key dimensions:

Efficiency Score

Weak

NEWN.SW struggles to generate sufficient returns from assets.

ROA > 10%
-12.24%

Valuation Score

Excellent

NEWN.SW trades at attractive valuation levels.

PE < 25
-13.37
PEG Ratio < 2
0.32

Growth Score

Weak

NEWN.SW faces weak or negative growth trends.

Revenue Growth > 5%
N/A
EPS Growth > 10%
N/A

Financial Health Score

Weak

NEWN.SW carries high financial risk with limited liquidity.

Debt/Equity < 1
208.91
Current Ratio > 1
0.29

Profitability Score

Weak

NEWN.SW struggles to sustain strong margins.

ROE > 15%
-197.55%
Net Margin ≥ 15%
0.00%
Positive Free Cash Flow
N/A

Key Financial Metrics

Is NEWN.SW Expensive or Cheap?

P/E Ratio

NEWN.SW trades at -13.37 times earnings. This suggests potential undervaluation.

-13.37

PEG Ratio

When adjusting for growth, NEWN.SW's PEG of 0.32 indicates potential undervaluation.

0.32

Price to Book

The market values Talenthouse AG at 2151.81 times its book value. This suggests the stock is fully valued or overvalued on an asset basis.

2151.81

EV/EBITDA

Enterprise value stands at -0.67 times EBITDA. This is generally considered low.

-0.67

How Well Does NEWN.SW Make Money?

Net Profit Margin

For every $100 in sales, Talenthouse AG keeps $0.00 as profit after all expenses.

0.00%

Operating Margin

Core operations generate 0.00 in profit for every $100 in revenue, before interest and taxes.

0.00%

ROE

Management delivers $-1.98 in profit for every $100 of shareholder equity.

-1.98%

ROA

Talenthouse AG generates $-12.24 in profit for every $100 in assets, demonstrating efficient asset deployment.

-12.24%

Following the Money - Real Cash Generation

FCF Per Share

Each share generates $-0.07 in free cash annually.

$-0.07

Financial Ratios Analysis

Valuation Ratios

P/E Ratio

Price to earnings ratio

-13.37

vs 25 benchmark

PEG Ratio

Price/earnings to growth ratio

0.32

vs 25 benchmark

P/B Ratio

Price to book value ratio

2151.81

vs 25 benchmark

P/S Ratio

Price to sales ratio

0.00

vs 25 benchmark

Financial Health

Debt/Equity

Total debt to shareholders' equity

208.91

vs 25 benchmark

Current Ratio

Current assets to current liabilities

0.29

vs 25 benchmark

Efficiency Ratios

ROE

Return on equity percentage

-1.98

vs 25 benchmark

ROA

Return on assets percentage

-0.12

vs 25 benchmark

ROCE

Return on capital employed

-0.66

vs 25 benchmark

How NEWN.SW Stacks Against Its Sector Peers

MetricNEWN.SW ValueSector AveragePerformance
P/E Ratio-13.3720.79 Better (Cheaper)
ROE-197.55%622.00% Weak
Net Margin0.00%-1174.00% (disorted) Weak
Debt/Equity208.911.51 Weak (High Leverage)
Current Ratio0.29935.58 Weak Liquidity
ROA-12.24%-788.00% (disorted) Weak

NEWN.SW outperforms its industry in 1 out of 6 key metrics, but lagging in ROE.

Historical Growth Performance

5-Year Growth Trajectory

This section reviews Talenthouse AG's 5-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) and compares its performance against the typical investment style of its industry.

Revenue CAGR

N/A

Industry Style: Value, Dividend, Cyclical

EPS CAGR

N/A

Industry Style: Value, Dividend, Cyclical

FCF CAGR

N/A

Industry Style: Value, Dividend, Cyclical

Fundamental Analysis FAQ