Northern Data AG
Northern Data AG NB2.F Peers
See (NB2.F) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Information Technology Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NB2.F | €24.48 | +2.86% | 1.5B | -10.72 | -€2.21 | N/A |
| IBM.DE | €249.70 | +0.00% | 230.7B | 48.95 | €5.07 | +2.55% |
| FIV.DE | €219.40 | +0.27% | 126.3B | 62.87 | €3.49 | N/A |
| COZ.DE | €84.46 | -0.68% | 41.6B | 19.78 | €4.27 | +1.33% |
| BC8.DE | €39.78 | +0.00% | 4.9B | 21.77 | €1.80 | +1.54% |
| 4018.F | €1,041.00 | -16.72% | 1.9B | 72.47 | €17.18 | N/A |
| NB2.DE | €24.00 | +0.00% | 1.5B | -10.42 | -€2.21 | N/A |
| 217A.F | €6.00 | +3.45% | 1.5B | -555.00 | -€0.01 | N/A |
| CHG.DE | €42.00 | +0.00% | 965.4M | -84.00 | -€0.50 | N/A |
| COK.DE | €28.05 | +0.00% | 876.1M | 34.75 | €0.80 | +3.60% |
Stock Comparison
NB2.F vs IBM.DE Comparison
NB2.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB2.F stands at 1.5B. In comparison, IBM.DE has a market cap of 230.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NB2.F is priced at €24.48, while IBM.DE trades at €249.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB2.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas IBM.DE's P/E ratio is 48.95. In terms of profitability, NB2.F's ROE is -0.16%, compared to IBM.DE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NB2.F is more volatile compared to IBM.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB2.F.
NB2.F vs FIV.DE Comparison
NB2.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB2.F stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FIV.DE has a market cap of 126.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NB2.F is priced at €24.48, while FIV.DE trades at €219.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB2.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas FIV.DE's P/E ratio is 62.87. In terms of profitability, NB2.F's ROE is -0.16%, compared to FIV.DE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NB2.F is more volatile compared to FIV.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB2.F.
NB2.F vs COZ.DE Comparison
NB2.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB2.F stands at 1.5B. In comparison, COZ.DE has a market cap of 41.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NB2.F is priced at €24.48, while COZ.DE trades at €84.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB2.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas COZ.DE's P/E ratio is 19.78. In terms of profitability, NB2.F's ROE is -0.16%, compared to COZ.DE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NB2.F is more volatile compared to COZ.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB2.F.
NB2.F vs BC8.DE Comparison
NB2.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB2.F stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BC8.DE has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NB2.F is priced at €24.48, while BC8.DE trades at €39.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB2.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas BC8.DE's P/E ratio is 21.77. In terms of profitability, NB2.F's ROE is -0.16%, compared to BC8.DE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NB2.F is less volatile compared to BC8.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB2.F.
NB2.F vs 4018.F Comparison
NB2.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB2.F stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 4018.F has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NB2.F is priced at €24.48, while 4018.F trades at €1,041.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB2.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas 4018.F's P/E ratio is 72.47. In terms of profitability, NB2.F's ROE is -0.16%, compared to 4018.F's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NB2.F is less volatile compared to 4018.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB2.F.
NB2.F vs NB2.DE Comparison
NB2.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB2.F stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NB2.DE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NB2.F is priced at €24.48, while NB2.DE trades at €24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB2.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas NB2.DE's P/E ratio is -10.42. In terms of profitability, NB2.F's ROE is -0.16%, compared to NB2.DE's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NB2.F is less volatile compared to NB2.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB2.F.
NB2.F vs 217A.F Comparison
NB2.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB2.F stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 217A.F has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NB2.F is priced at €24.48, while 217A.F trades at €6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB2.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas 217A.F's P/E ratio is -555.00. In terms of profitability, NB2.F's ROE is -0.16%, compared to 217A.F's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NB2.F is less volatile compared to 217A.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB2.F.
NB2.F vs CHG.DE Comparison
NB2.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB2.F stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CHG.DE has a market cap of 965.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NB2.F is priced at €24.48, while CHG.DE trades at €42.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB2.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas CHG.DE's P/E ratio is -84.00. In terms of profitability, NB2.F's ROE is -0.16%, compared to CHG.DE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NB2.F is less volatile compared to CHG.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB2.F.
NB2.F vs COK.DE Comparison
NB2.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB2.F stands at 1.5B. In comparison, COK.DE has a market cap of 876.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NB2.F is priced at €24.48, while COK.DE trades at €28.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB2.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas COK.DE's P/E ratio is 34.75. In terms of profitability, NB2.F's ROE is -0.16%, compared to COK.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NB2.F is more volatile compared to COK.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB2.F.
NB2.F vs DE000A3H2200.SG Comparison
NB2.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB2.F stands at 1.5B. In comparison, DE000A3H2200.SG has a market cap of 813.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NB2.F is priced at €24.48, while DE000A3H2200.SG trades at €60.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB2.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas DE000A3H2200.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NB2.F's ROE is -0.16%, compared to DE000A3H2200.SG's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NB2.F is less volatile compared to DE000A3H2200.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB2.F.
NB2.F vs NA9.DE Comparison
NB2.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB2.F stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NA9.DE has a market cap of 789.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NB2.F is priced at €24.48, while NA9.DE trades at €61.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB2.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas NA9.DE's P/E ratio is 18.33. In terms of profitability, NB2.F's ROE is -0.16%, compared to NA9.DE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NB2.F is more volatile compared to NA9.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB2.F.
NB2.F vs NA9.F Comparison
NB2.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB2.F stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NA9.F has a market cap of 787.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NB2.F is priced at €24.48, while NA9.F trades at €60.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB2.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas NA9.F's P/E ratio is 17.49. In terms of profitability, NB2.F's ROE is -0.16%, compared to NA9.F's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NB2.F is less volatile compared to NA9.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB2.F.
NB2.F vs USY1.DE Comparison
NB2.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB2.F stands at 1.5B. In comparison, USY1.DE has a market cap of 700.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NB2.F is priced at €24.48, while USY1.DE trades at €10.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB2.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas USY1.DE's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, NB2.F's ROE is -0.16%, compared to USY1.DE's ROE of +2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NB2.F is more volatile compared to USY1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB2.F.
NB2.F vs GFT.DE Comparison
NB2.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB2.F stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GFT.DE has a market cap of 637.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NB2.F is priced at €24.48, while GFT.DE trades at €24.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB2.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas GFT.DE's P/E ratio is 14.76. In terms of profitability, NB2.F's ROE is -0.16%, compared to GFT.DE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NB2.F is less volatile compared to GFT.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB2.F.
NB2.F vs ADN1.DE Comparison
NB2.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB2.F stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ADN1.DE has a market cap of 568.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NB2.F is priced at €24.48, while ADN1.DE trades at €88.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB2.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas ADN1.DE's P/E ratio is -804.55. In terms of profitability, NB2.F's ROE is -0.16%, compared to ADN1.DE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NB2.F is less volatile compared to ADN1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB2.F.
NB2.F vs SHF.DE Comparison
NB2.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB2.F stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SHF.DE has a market cap of 520M. Regarding current trading prices, NB2.F is priced at €24.48, while SHF.DE trades at €71.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB2.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas SHF.DE's P/E ratio is 23.03. In terms of profitability, NB2.F's ROE is -0.16%, compared to SHF.DE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NB2.F is less volatile compared to SHF.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB2.F.
NB2.F vs D6H.DE Comparison
NB2.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB2.F stands at 1.5B. In comparison, D6H.DE has a market cap of 510.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NB2.F is priced at €24.48, while D6H.DE trades at €61.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB2.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas D6H.DE's P/E ratio is 20.60. In terms of profitability, NB2.F's ROE is -0.16%, compared to D6H.DE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NB2.F is less volatile compared to D6H.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB2.F.
NB2.F vs IXX.DE Comparison
NB2.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB2.F stands at 1.5B. In comparison, IXX.DE has a market cap of 374.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NB2.F is priced at €24.48, while IXX.DE trades at €38.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB2.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas IXX.DE's P/E ratio is 25.44. In terms of profitability, NB2.F's ROE is -0.16%, compared to IXX.DE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NB2.F is more volatile compared to IXX.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB2.F.
NB2.F vs A1OS.DE Comparison
NB2.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB2.F stands at 1.5B. In comparison, A1OS.DE has a market cap of 267.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NB2.F is priced at €24.48, while A1OS.DE trades at €56.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB2.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas A1OS.DE's P/E ratio is 17.15. In terms of profitability, NB2.F's ROE is -0.16%, compared to A1OS.DE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NB2.F is less volatile compared to A1OS.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB2.F.
NB2.F vs MCE.DE Comparison
NB2.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB2.F stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MCE.DE has a market cap of 232.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NB2.F is priced at €24.48, while MCE.DE trades at €14.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB2.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas MCE.DE's P/E ratio is -39.17. In terms of profitability, NB2.F's ROE is -0.16%, compared to MCE.DE's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NB2.F is more volatile compared to MCE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB2.F.
NB2.F vs AEIN.DE Comparison
NB2.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB2.F stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AEIN.DE has a market cap of 216.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NB2.F is priced at €24.48, while AEIN.DE trades at €19.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB2.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas AEIN.DE's P/E ratio is 26.48. In terms of profitability, NB2.F's ROE is -0.16%, compared to AEIN.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NB2.F is less volatile compared to AEIN.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB2.F.
NB2.F vs OSP2.DE Comparison
NB2.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB2.F stands at 1.5B. In comparison, OSP2.DE has a market cap of 185.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NB2.F is priced at €24.48, while OSP2.DE trades at €18.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB2.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas OSP2.DE's P/E ratio is 32.95. In terms of profitability, NB2.F's ROE is -0.16%, compared to OSP2.DE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NB2.F is more volatile compared to OSP2.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB2.F.
NB2.F vs 30L3.DE Comparison
NB2.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB2.F stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 30L3.DE has a market cap of 134.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NB2.F is priced at €24.48, while 30L3.DE trades at €1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB2.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas 30L3.DE's P/E ratio is 6.29. In terms of profitability, NB2.F's ROE is -0.16%, compared to 30L3.DE's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NB2.F is less volatile compared to 30L3.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB2.F.
NB2.F vs QBY.DE Comparison
NB2.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB2.F stands at 1.5B. In comparison, QBY.DE has a market cap of 115.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NB2.F is priced at €24.48, while QBY.DE trades at €0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB2.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas QBY.DE's P/E ratio is -31.00. In terms of profitability, NB2.F's ROE is -0.16%, compared to QBY.DE's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NB2.F is less volatile compared to QBY.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB2.F.
NB2.F vs 3IT.F Comparison
NB2.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB2.F stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 3IT.F has a market cap of 65.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NB2.F is priced at €24.48, while 3IT.F trades at €13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB2.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas 3IT.F's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, NB2.F's ROE is -0.16%, compared to 3IT.F's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NB2.F is more volatile compared to 3IT.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB2.F.
NB2.F vs OBS.DE Comparison
NB2.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB2.F stands at 1.5B. In comparison, OBS.DE has a market cap of 65.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NB2.F is priced at €24.48, while OBS.DE trades at €7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB2.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas OBS.DE's P/E ratio is 16.43. In terms of profitability, NB2.F's ROE is -0.16%, compared to OBS.DE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NB2.F is more volatile compared to OBS.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB2.F.
NB2.F vs IE2A.F Comparison
NB2.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB2.F stands at 1.5B. In comparison, IE2A.F has a market cap of 64.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NB2.F is priced at €24.48, while IE2A.F trades at €0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB2.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas IE2A.F's P/E ratio is 4.98. In terms of profitability, NB2.F's ROE is -0.16%, compared to IE2A.F's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NB2.F is more volatile compared to IE2A.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB2.F.
NB2.F vs 3IT.DE Comparison
NB2.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB2.F stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 3IT.DE has a market cap of 64.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NB2.F is priced at €24.48, while 3IT.DE trades at €13.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB2.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas 3IT.DE's P/E ratio is 18.71. In terms of profitability, NB2.F's ROE is -0.16%, compared to 3IT.DE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NB2.F is less volatile compared to 3IT.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB2.F.
NB2.F vs KSC.DE Comparison
NB2.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB2.F stands at 1.5B. In comparison, KSC.DE has a market cap of 34M. Regarding current trading prices, NB2.F is priced at €24.48, while KSC.DE trades at €0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB2.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas KSC.DE's P/E ratio is -1.84. In terms of profitability, NB2.F's ROE is -0.16%, compared to KSC.DE's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, NB2.F is more volatile compared to KSC.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB2.F.
NB2.F vs SYT.DE Comparison
NB2.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB2.F stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SYT.DE has a market cap of 33.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NB2.F is priced at €24.48, while SYT.DE trades at €3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB2.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas SYT.DE's P/E ratio is -10.44. In terms of profitability, NB2.F's ROE is -0.16%, compared to SYT.DE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NB2.F is more volatile compared to SYT.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB2.F.
NB2.F vs T3T1.DE Comparison
NB2.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB2.F stands at 1.5B. In comparison, T3T1.DE has a market cap of 19.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NB2.F is priced at €24.48, while T3T1.DE trades at €5.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB2.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas T3T1.DE's P/E ratio is 13.78. In terms of profitability, NB2.F's ROE is -0.16%, compared to T3T1.DE's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NB2.F is more volatile compared to T3T1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB2.F.
NB2.F vs PDA.DE Comparison
NB2.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB2.F stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PDA.DE has a market cap of 11.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NB2.F is priced at €24.48, while PDA.DE trades at €2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB2.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas PDA.DE's P/E ratio is 30.50. In terms of profitability, NB2.F's ROE is -0.16%, compared to PDA.DE's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, NB2.F is less volatile compared to PDA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB2.F.
NB2.F vs AMI.F Comparison
NB2.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB2.F stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AMI.F has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NB2.F is priced at €24.48, while AMI.F trades at €0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB2.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas AMI.F's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, NB2.F's ROE is -0.16%, compared to AMI.F's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NB2.F is less volatile compared to AMI.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB2.F.
NB2.F vs SHWK.DE Comparison
NB2.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB2.F stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SHWK.DE has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NB2.F is priced at €24.48, while SHWK.DE trades at €3.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB2.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas SHWK.DE's P/E ratio is -3.34. In terms of profitability, NB2.F's ROE is -0.16%, compared to SHWK.DE's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, NB2.F is more volatile compared to SHWK.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB2.F.
NB2.F vs AMI.DE Comparison
NB2.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB2.F stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AMI.DE has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NB2.F is priced at €24.48, while AMI.DE trades at €0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB2.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas AMI.DE's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, NB2.F's ROE is -0.16%, compared to AMI.DE's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NB2.F is less volatile compared to AMI.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB2.F.
NB2.F vs RTC.DE Comparison
NB2.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB2.F stands at 1.5B. In comparison, RTC.DE has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NB2.F is priced at €24.48, while RTC.DE trades at €1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB2.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas RTC.DE's P/E ratio is 34.33. In terms of profitability, NB2.F's ROE is -0.16%, compared to RTC.DE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NB2.F is less volatile compared to RTC.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB2.F.
NB2.F vs ASKN.DE Comparison
NB2.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB2.F stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ASKN.DE has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NB2.F is priced at €24.48, while ASKN.DE trades at €0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB2.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas ASKN.DE's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, NB2.F's ROE is -0.16%, compared to ASKN.DE's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NB2.F is less volatile compared to ASKN.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB2.F.
NB2.F vs MDV.DU Comparison
NB2.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB2.F stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MDV.DU has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NB2.F is priced at €24.48, while MDV.DU trades at €6.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB2.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas MDV.DU's P/E ratio is -71.26. In terms of profitability, NB2.F's ROE is -0.16%, compared to MDV.DU's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NB2.F is more volatile compared to MDV.DU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB2.F.
NB2.F vs SFD1.DE Comparison
NB2.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB2.F stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SFD1.DE has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NB2.F is priced at €24.48, while SFD1.DE trades at €0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB2.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas SFD1.DE's P/E ratio is -45.00. In terms of profitability, NB2.F's ROE is -0.16%, compared to SFD1.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NB2.F is more volatile compared to SFD1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB2.F.
NB2.F vs EUCA.DE Comparison
NB2.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB2.F stands at 1.5B. In comparison, EUCA.DE has a market cap of 990.6K. Regarding current trading prices, NB2.F is priced at €24.48, while EUCA.DE trades at €0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB2.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas EUCA.DE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NB2.F's ROE is -0.16%, compared to EUCA.DE's ROE of +2.90%. Regarding short-term risk, NB2.F is less volatile compared to EUCA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB2.F.
NB2.F vs WDL.DE Comparison
NB2.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB2.F stands at 1.5B. In comparison, WDL.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NB2.F is priced at €24.48, while WDL.DE trades at €1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB2.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas WDL.DE's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, NB2.F's ROE is -0.16%, compared to WDL.DE's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NB2.F is less volatile compared to WDL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB2.F.
NB2.F vs 2QU.DE Comparison
NB2.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB2.F stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 2QU.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NB2.F is priced at €24.48, while 2QU.DE trades at €17.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB2.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas 2QU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NB2.F's ROE is -0.16%, compared to 2QU.DE's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NB2.F is more volatile compared to 2QU.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB2.F.