medondo holding AG (XETRA: AMI.DE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See AMI.DE's competitors and their performance on the XETRA and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Information Technology Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for AMI.DE and its XETRA peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMI.DE | €0.16 | +0.62% | 3.4M | -0.21 | -€0.78 | N/A |
| IBM.DE | €209.25 | +1.65% | 197.1B | 20.26 | €10.33 | +2.76% |
| COZ.DE | €59.45 | +0.95% | 26.8B | 15.05 | €3.95 | +1.89% |
| FIV.DE | €42.50 | +0.64% | 22.6B | 6.00 | €7.08 | N/A |
| 6WS.SG | €12.31 | +0.00% | 15.6B | 27.57 | €0.45 | N/A |
| BC8.DE | €35.16 | +0.98% | 4.4B | 18.77 | €1.87 | +1.99% |
| KTN.DE | €20.02 | -1.57% | 1.2B | 14.85 | €1.35 | N/A |
| NA9.DE | €79.30 | +0.44% | 981.4M | 19.92 | €3.98 | +1.26% |
| NA9.SG | €78.70 | -0.32% | 974M | 19.77 | €3.98 | +1.27% |
| SHF.DE | €98.00 | +0.00% | 714.4M | 16.07 | €6.10 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
International Business Machines Corporation (XETRA: IBM.DE)
AMI.DE vs IBM.DE Comparison October 2026
medondo holding AG (XETRA: AMI.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMI.DE stands at 3.4M. In comparison, IBM.DE has a market cap of 197.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMI.DE is priced at €0.16 on the XETRA, while IBM.DE trades at €209.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMI.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas IBM.DE's P/E ratio is 20.26. In terms of profitability, AMI.DE's ROE is -1.92%, compared to IBM.DE's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, AMI.DE is more volatile compared to IBM.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMI.DE.Check IBM.DE's competition here
Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation (XETRA: COZ.DE)
AMI.DE vs COZ.DE Comparison October 2026
medondo holding AG (XETRA: AMI.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMI.DE stands at 3.4M. In comparison, COZ.DE has a market cap of 26.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMI.DE is priced at €0.16 on the XETRA, while COZ.DE trades at €59.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMI.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas COZ.DE's P/E ratio is 15.05. In terms of profitability, AMI.DE's ROE is -1.92%, compared to COZ.DE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AMI.DE is more volatile compared to COZ.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMI.DE.Check COZ.DE's competition here
Fiserv, Inc. (XETRA: FIV.DE)
AMI.DE vs FIV.DE Comparison October 2026
medondo holding AG (XETRA: AMI.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMI.DE stands at 3.4M. In comparison, FIV.DE has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMI.DE is priced at €0.16 on the XETRA, while FIV.DE trades at €42.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMI.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas FIV.DE's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, AMI.DE's ROE is -1.92%, compared to FIV.DE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AMI.DE is more volatile compared to FIV.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMI.DE.Check FIV.DE's competition here
Wise plc (STU: 6WS.SG)
AMI.DE vs 6WS.SG Comparison October 2026
medondo holding AG (XETRA: AMI.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMI.DE stands at 3.4M. In comparison, 6WS.SG has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMI.DE is priced at €0.16 on the XETRA, while 6WS.SG trades at €12.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMI.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas 6WS.SG's P/E ratio is 27.57. In terms of profitability, AMI.DE's ROE is -1.92%, compared to 6WS.SG's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, AMI.DE is more volatile compared to 6WS.SG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMI.DE.Check 6WS.SG's competition here
Bechtle AG (XETRA: BC8.DE)
AMI.DE vs BC8.DE Comparison October 2026
medondo holding AG (XETRA: AMI.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMI.DE stands at 3.4M. In comparison, BC8.DE has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMI.DE is priced at €0.16 on the XETRA, while BC8.DE trades at €35.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMI.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas BC8.DE's P/E ratio is 18.77. In terms of profitability, AMI.DE's ROE is -1.92%, compared to BC8.DE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMI.DE is more volatile compared to BC8.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMI.DE.Check BC8.DE's competition here
Kontron AG (XETRA: KTN.DE)
AMI.DE vs KTN.DE Comparison October 2026
medondo holding AG (XETRA: AMI.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMI.DE stands at 3.4M. In comparison, KTN.DE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMI.DE is priced at €0.16 on the XETRA, while KTN.DE trades at €20.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMI.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas KTN.DE's P/E ratio is 14.85. In terms of profitability, AMI.DE's ROE is -1.92%, compared to KTN.DE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMI.DE is more volatile compared to KTN.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMI.DE.Check KTN.DE's competition here
Nagarro SE (XETRA: NA9.DE)
AMI.DE vs NA9.DE Comparison October 2026
medondo holding AG (XETRA: AMI.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMI.DE stands at 3.4M. In comparison, NA9.DE has a market cap of 981.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AMI.DE is priced at €0.16 on the XETRA, while NA9.DE trades at €79.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMI.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas NA9.DE's P/E ratio is 19.92. In terms of profitability, AMI.DE's ROE is -1.92%, compared to NA9.DE's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, AMI.DE is more volatile compared to NA9.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMI.DE.Check NA9.DE's competition here
Nagarro SE (STU: NA9.SG)
AMI.DE vs NA9.SG Comparison October 2026
medondo holding AG (XETRA: AMI.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMI.DE stands at 3.4M. In comparison, NA9.SG has a market cap of 974M. Regarding current trading prices, AMI.DE is priced at €0.16 on the XETRA, while NA9.SG trades at €78.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMI.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas NA9.SG's P/E ratio is 19.77. In terms of profitability, AMI.DE's ROE is -1.92%, compared to NA9.SG's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, AMI.DE is more volatile compared to NA9.SG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMI.DE.Check NA9.SG's competition here
SNP Schneider-Neureither & Partner SE (XETRA: SHF.DE)
AMI.DE vs SHF.DE Comparison October 2026
medondo holding AG (XETRA: AMI.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMI.DE stands at 3.4M. In comparison, SHF.DE has a market cap of 714.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AMI.DE is priced at €0.16 on the XETRA, while SHF.DE trades at €98.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMI.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas SHF.DE's P/E ratio is 16.07. In terms of profitability, AMI.DE's ROE is -1.92%, compared to SHF.DE's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AMI.DE is more volatile compared to SHF.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMI.DE.Check SHF.DE's competition here
GFT Technologies SE (XETRA: GFT.DE)
AMI.DE vs GFT.DE Comparison October 2026
medondo holding AG (XETRA: AMI.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMI.DE stands at 3.4M. In comparison, GFT.DE has a market cap of 703M. Regarding current trading prices, AMI.DE is priced at €0.16 on the XETRA, while GFT.DE trades at €27.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMI.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas GFT.DE's P/E ratio is 19.31. In terms of profitability, AMI.DE's ROE is -1.92%, compared to GFT.DE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AMI.DE is more volatile compared to GFT.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMI.DE.Check GFT.DE's competition here
Unisys Corporation (XETRA: USY1.DE)
AMI.DE vs USY1.DE Comparison October 2026
medondo holding AG (XETRA: AMI.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMI.DE stands at 3.4M. In comparison, USY1.DE has a market cap of 700.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AMI.DE is priced at €0.16 on the XETRA, while USY1.DE trades at €10.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMI.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas USY1.DE's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, AMI.DE's ROE is -1.92%, compared to USY1.DE's ROE of +5.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AMI.DE is more volatile compared to USY1.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMI.DE.Check USY1.DE's competition here
Datagroup Se (XETRA: D6H0.DE)
AMI.DE vs D6H0.DE Comparison October 2026
medondo holding AG (XETRA: AMI.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMI.DE stands at 3.4M. In comparison, D6H0.DE has a market cap of 655.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AMI.DE is priced at €0.16 on the XETRA, while D6H0.DE trades at €79.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMI.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas D6H0.DE's P/E ratio is 31.66. In terms of profitability, AMI.DE's ROE is -1.92%, compared to D6H0.DE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AMI.DE is more volatile compared to D6H0.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMI.DE.Check D6H0.DE's competition here
Cancom SE (XETRA: COK.DE)
AMI.DE vs COK.DE Comparison October 2026
medondo holding AG (XETRA: AMI.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMI.DE stands at 3.4M. In comparison, COK.DE has a market cap of 652.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AMI.DE is priced at €0.16 on the XETRA, while COK.DE trades at €22.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMI.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas COK.DE's P/E ratio is 18.92. In terms of profitability, AMI.DE's ROE is -1.92%, compared to COK.DE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMI.DE is more volatile compared to COK.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMI.DE.Check COK.DE's competition here
Datagroup Se (XETRA: D6H.DE)
AMI.DE vs D6H.DE Comparison October 2026
medondo holding AG (XETRA: AMI.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMI.DE stands at 3.4M. In comparison, D6H.DE has a market cap of 615.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AMI.DE is priced at €0.16 on the XETRA, while D6H.DE trades at €74.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMI.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas D6H.DE's P/E ratio is 32.40. In terms of profitability, AMI.DE's ROE is -1.92%, compared to D6H.DE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMI.DE is more volatile compared to D6H.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMI.DE.Check D6H.DE's competition here
Northern Data AG (XETRA: NB2.DE)
AMI.DE vs NB2.DE Comparison October 2026
medondo holding AG (XETRA: AMI.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMI.DE stands at 3.4M. In comparison, NB2.DE has a market cap of 542.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AMI.DE is priced at €0.16 on the XETRA, while NB2.DE trades at €8.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMI.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas NB2.DE's P/E ratio is -1.07. In terms of profitability, AMI.DE's ROE is -1.92%, compared to NB2.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMI.DE is less volatile compared to NB2.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMI.DE.Check NB2.DE's competition here
init innovation in traffic systems SE (XETRA: IXX.DE)
AMI.DE vs IXX.DE Comparison October 2026
medondo holding AG (XETRA: AMI.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMI.DE stands at 3.4M. In comparison, IXX.DE has a market cap of 462.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AMI.DE is priced at €0.16 on the XETRA, while IXX.DE trades at €42.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMI.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas IXX.DE's P/E ratio is 19.52. In terms of profitability, AMI.DE's ROE is -1.92%, compared to IXX.DE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AMI.DE is more volatile compared to IXX.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMI.DE.Check IXX.DE's competition here
adesso SE (XETRA: ADN1.DE)
AMI.DE vs ADN1.DE Comparison October 2026
medondo holding AG (XETRA: AMI.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMI.DE stands at 3.4M. In comparison, ADN1.DE has a market cap of 440.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AMI.DE is priced at €0.16 on the XETRA, while ADN1.DE trades at €68.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMI.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas ADN1.DE's P/E ratio is 24.23. In terms of profitability, AMI.DE's ROE is -1.92%, compared to ADN1.DE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AMI.DE is more volatile compared to ADN1.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMI.DE.Check ADN1.DE's competition here
All for One Group SE (XETRA: A1OS.DE)
AMI.DE vs A1OS.DE Comparison October 2026
medondo holding AG (XETRA: AMI.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMI.DE stands at 3.4M. In comparison, A1OS.DE has a market cap of 340.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AMI.DE is priced at €0.16 on the XETRA, while A1OS.DE trades at €73.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMI.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas A1OS.DE's P/E ratio is -36.70. In terms of profitability, AMI.DE's ROE is -1.92%, compared to A1OS.DE's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMI.DE is more volatile compared to A1OS.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMI.DE.Check A1OS.DE's competition here
MEDIQON Group AG (XETRA: MCE.DE)
AMI.DE vs MCE.DE Comparison October 2026
medondo holding AG (XETRA: AMI.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMI.DE stands at 3.4M. In comparison, MCE.DE has a market cap of 232.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AMI.DE is priced at €0.16 on the XETRA, while MCE.DE trades at €14.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMI.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas MCE.DE's P/E ratio is -39.17. In terms of profitability, AMI.DE's ROE is -1.92%, compared to MCE.DE's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AMI.DE is more volatile compared to MCE.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMI.DE.Check MCE.DE's competition here
USU Software AG (XETRA: OSP2.DE)
AMI.DE vs OSP2.DE Comparison October 2026
medondo holding AG (XETRA: AMI.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMI.DE stands at 3.4M. In comparison, OSP2.DE has a market cap of 185.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AMI.DE is priced at €0.16 on the XETRA, while OSP2.DE trades at €18.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMI.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas OSP2.DE's P/E ratio is 32.95. In terms of profitability, AMI.DE's ROE is -1.92%, compared to OSP2.DE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMI.DE is more volatile compared to OSP2.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMI.DE.Check OSP2.DE's competition here
Allgeier SE (XETRA: AEIN.DE)
AMI.DE vs AEIN.DE Comparison October 2026
medondo holding AG (XETRA: AMI.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMI.DE stands at 3.4M. In comparison, AEIN.DE has a market cap of 151.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AMI.DE is priced at €0.16 on the XETRA, while AEIN.DE trades at €13.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMI.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas AEIN.DE's P/E ratio is 7.01. In terms of profitability, AMI.DE's ROE is -1.92%, compared to AEIN.DE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMI.DE is more volatile compared to AEIN.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMI.DE.Check AEIN.DE's competition here
Solutions 30 SE (XETRA: 30L3.DE)
AMI.DE vs 30L3.DE Comparison October 2026
medondo holding AG (XETRA: AMI.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMI.DE stands at 3.4M. In comparison, 30L3.DE has a market cap of 134.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AMI.DE is priced at €0.16 on the XETRA, while 30L3.DE trades at €1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMI.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas 30L3.DE's P/E ratio is 6.29. In terms of profitability, AMI.DE's ROE is -1.92%, compared to 30L3.DE's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AMI.DE is more volatile compared to 30L3.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMI.DE.Check 30L3.DE's competition here
audius SE (XETRA: 3IT.DE)
AMI.DE vs 3IT.DE Comparison October 2026
medondo holding AG (XETRA: AMI.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMI.DE stands at 3.4M. In comparison, 3IT.DE has a market cap of 64.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AMI.DE is priced at €0.16 on the XETRA, while 3IT.DE trades at €13.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMI.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas 3IT.DE's P/E ratio is 18.71. In terms of profitability, AMI.DE's ROE is -1.92%, compared to 3IT.DE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AMI.DE is more volatile compared to 3IT.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMI.DE.Check 3IT.DE's competition here
audius SE (XETRA: 3ITN.DE)
AMI.DE vs 3ITN.DE Comparison October 2026
medondo holding AG (XETRA: AMI.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMI.DE stands at 3.4M. In comparison, 3ITN.DE has a market cap of 47M. Regarding current trading prices, AMI.DE is priced at €0.16 on the XETRA, while 3ITN.DE trades at €9.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMI.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas 3ITN.DE's P/E ratio is 19.51. In terms of profitability, AMI.DE's ROE is -1.92%, compared to 3ITN.DE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AMI.DE is more volatile compared to 3ITN.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMI.DE.Check 3ITN.DE's competition here
Orbis AG (XETRA: OBS.DE)
AMI.DE vs OBS.DE Comparison October 2026
medondo holding AG (XETRA: AMI.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMI.DE stands at 3.4M. In comparison, OBS.DE has a market cap of 44.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AMI.DE is priced at €0.16 on the XETRA, while OBS.DE trades at €4.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMI.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas OBS.DE's P/E ratio is 11.64. In terms of profitability, AMI.DE's ROE is -1.92%, compared to OBS.DE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AMI.DE is more volatile compared to OBS.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMI.DE.Check OBS.DE's competition here
Softing AG (XETRA: SYT.DE)
AMI.DE vs SYT.DE Comparison October 2026
medondo holding AG (XETRA: AMI.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMI.DE stands at 3.4M. In comparison, SYT.DE has a market cap of 26.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AMI.DE is priced at €0.16 on the XETRA, while SYT.DE trades at €2.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMI.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas SYT.DE's P/E ratio is -3.80. In terms of profitability, AMI.DE's ROE is -1.92%, compared to SYT.DE's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMI.DE is more volatile compared to SYT.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMI.DE.Check SYT.DE's competition here
q.beyond AG (XETRA: QBY.DE)
AMI.DE vs QBY.DE Comparison October 2026
medondo holding AG (XETRA: AMI.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMI.DE stands at 3.4M. In comparison, QBY.DE has a market cap of 19.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AMI.DE is priced at €0.16 on the XETRA, while QBY.DE trades at €0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMI.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas QBY.DE's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, AMI.DE's ROE is -1.92%, compared to QBY.DE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMI.DE is more volatile compared to QBY.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMI.DE.Check QBY.DE's competition here
AnchorCore SE Class A (XETRA: LRND.DE)
AMI.DE vs LRND.DE Comparison October 2026
medondo holding AG (XETRA: AMI.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMI.DE stands at 3.4M. In comparison, LRND.DE has a market cap of 18.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AMI.DE is priced at €0.16 on the XETRA, while LRND.DE trades at €1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMI.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas LRND.DE's P/E ratio is -2.39. In terms of profitability, AMI.DE's ROE is -1.92%, compared to LRND.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AMI.DE is more volatile compared to LRND.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMI.DE.Check LRND.DE's competition here
Seven Principles AG (XETRA: T3T1.DE)
AMI.DE vs T3T1.DE Comparison October 2026
medondo holding AG (XETRA: AMI.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMI.DE stands at 3.4M. In comparison, T3T1.DE has a market cap of 18M. Regarding current trading prices, AMI.DE is priced at €0.16 on the XETRA, while T3T1.DE trades at €4.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMI.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas T3T1.DE's P/E ratio is 25.59. In terms of profitability, AMI.DE's ROE is -1.92%, compared to T3T1.DE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMI.DE is more volatile compared to T3T1.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMI.DE.Check T3T1.DE's competition here
PRO DV Software AG (XETRA: PDA.DE)
AMI.DE vs PDA.DE Comparison October 2026
medondo holding AG (XETRA: AMI.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMI.DE stands at 3.4M. In comparison, PDA.DE has a market cap of 11.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AMI.DE is priced at €0.16 on the XETRA, while PDA.DE trades at €2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMI.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas PDA.DE's P/E ratio is 30.50. In terms of profitability, AMI.DE's ROE is -1.92%, compared to PDA.DE's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, AMI.DE is less volatile compared to PDA.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMI.DE.Check PDA.DE's competition here
Kps AG (XETRA: KSC.DE)
AMI.DE vs KSC.DE Comparison October 2026
medondo holding AG (XETRA: AMI.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMI.DE stands at 3.4M. In comparison, KSC.DE has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AMI.DE is priced at €0.16 on the XETRA, while KSC.DE trades at €0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMI.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas KSC.DE's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, AMI.DE's ROE is -1.92%, compared to KSC.DE's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, AMI.DE is more volatile compared to KSC.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMI.DE.Check KSC.DE's competition here
SHS Viveon AG (XETRA: SHWK.DE)
AMI.DE vs SHWK.DE Comparison October 2026
medondo holding AG (XETRA: AMI.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMI.DE stands at 3.4M. In comparison, SHWK.DE has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AMI.DE is priced at €0.16 on the XETRA, while SHWK.DE trades at €3.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMI.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas SHWK.DE's P/E ratio is -3.34. In terms of profitability, AMI.DE's ROE is -1.92%, compared to SHWK.DE's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, AMI.DE is more volatile compared to SHWK.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMI.DE.Check SHWK.DE's competition here
RealTech AG (XETRA: RTC.DE)
AMI.DE vs RTC.DE Comparison October 2026
medondo holding AG (XETRA: AMI.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMI.DE stands at 3.4M. In comparison, RTC.DE has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AMI.DE is priced at €0.16 on the XETRA, while RTC.DE trades at €1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMI.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas RTC.DE's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, AMI.DE's ROE is -1.92%, compared to RTC.DE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMI.DE is more volatile compared to RTC.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMI.DE.Check RTC.DE's competition here
Pro Dv AG (XETRA: PDA0.DE)
AMI.DE vs PDA0.DE Comparison October 2026
medondo holding AG (XETRA: AMI.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMI.DE stands at 3.4M. In comparison, PDA0.DE has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AMI.DE is priced at €0.16 on the XETRA, while PDA0.DE trades at €1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMI.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas PDA0.DE's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, AMI.DE's ROE is -1.92%, compared to PDA0.DE's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AMI.DE is more volatile compared to PDA0.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMI.DE.Check PDA0.DE's competition here
asknet Solutions AG (XETRA: ASKN.DE)
AMI.DE vs ASKN.DE Comparison October 2026
medondo holding AG (XETRA: AMI.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMI.DE stands at 3.4M. In comparison, ASKN.DE has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AMI.DE is priced at €0.16 on the XETRA, while ASKN.DE trades at €0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMI.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas ASKN.DE's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, AMI.DE's ROE is -1.92%, compared to ASKN.DE's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMI.DE is less volatile compared to ASKN.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMI.DE.Check ASKN.DE's competition here
Mendarion SE (DUS: MDV.DU)
AMI.DE vs MDV.DU Comparison October 2026
medondo holding AG (XETRA: AMI.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMI.DE stands at 3.4M. In comparison, MDV.DU has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AMI.DE is priced at €0.16 on the XETRA, while MDV.DU trades at €6.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMI.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas MDV.DU's P/E ratio is -71.26. In terms of profitability, AMI.DE's ROE is -1.92%, compared to MDV.DU's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMI.DE is more volatile compared to MDV.DU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMI.DE.Check MDV.DU's competition here
Softline AG (XETRA: SFD1.DE)
AMI.DE vs SFD1.DE Comparison October 2026
medondo holding AG (XETRA: AMI.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMI.DE stands at 3.4M. In comparison, SFD1.DE has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AMI.DE is priced at €0.16 on the XETRA, while SFD1.DE trades at €0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMI.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas SFD1.DE's P/E ratio is -45.00. In terms of profitability, AMI.DE's ROE is -1.92%, compared to SFD1.DE's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AMI.DE is more volatile compared to SFD1.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMI.DE.Check SFD1.DE's competition here
euromicron AG (XETRA: EUCA.DE)
AMI.DE vs EUCA.DE Comparison October 2026
medondo holding AG (XETRA: AMI.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMI.DE stands at 3.4M. In comparison, EUCA.DE has a market cap of 990.6K. Regarding current trading prices, AMI.DE is priced at €0.16 on the XETRA, while EUCA.DE trades at €0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMI.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas EUCA.DE's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, AMI.DE's ROE is -1.92%, compared to EUCA.DE's ROE of +2.90%. Regarding short-term risk, AMI.DE is more volatile compared to EUCA.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMI.DE.Check EUCA.DE's competition here
q.beyond AG (XETRA: QBY0.DE)
AMI.DE vs QBY0.DE Comparison October 2026
medondo holding AG (XETRA: AMI.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMI.DE stands at 3.4M. In comparison, QBY0.DE has a market cap of 669.7K. Regarding current trading prices, AMI.DE is priced at €0.16 on the XETRA, while QBY0.DE trades at €3.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMI.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas QBY0.DE's P/E ratio is -321.53. In terms of profitability, AMI.DE's ROE is -1.92%, compared to QBY0.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMI.DE is more volatile compared to QBY0.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMI.DE.Check QBY0.DE's competition here
windeln.de SE (XETRA: WDL.DE)
AMI.DE vs WDL.DE Comparison October 2026
medondo holding AG (XETRA: AMI.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMI.DE stands at 3.4M. In comparison, WDL.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AMI.DE is priced at €0.16 on the XETRA, while WDL.DE trades at €1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMI.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas WDL.DE's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, AMI.DE's ROE is -1.92%, compared to WDL.DE's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMI.DE is less volatile compared to WDL.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMI.DE.Check WDL.DE's competition here
Onoff AG (XETRA: 2QU.DE)
AMI.DE vs 2QU.DE Comparison October 2026
medondo holding AG (XETRA: AMI.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMI.DE stands at 3.4M. In comparison, 2QU.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AMI.DE is priced at €0.16 on the XETRA, while 2QU.DE trades at €17.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMI.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas 2QU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMI.DE's ROE is -1.92%, compared to 2QU.DE's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AMI.DE is more volatile compared to 2QU.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMI.DE.Check 2QU.DE's competition here