NevGold Corp.
NevGold Corp. NAUFF Peers
See (NAUFF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Other Precious Metals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NAUFF | $0.26 | +2.28% | 23.7M | -8.52 | -$0.03 | N/A |
| AUXIF | $0.01 | N/A | 50.5B | 0.10 | $0.06 | N/A |
| FNLPF | $19.65 | +2.08% | 14.5B | 103.42 | $0.19 | +3.85% |
| ANGPY | $7.09 | -9.45% | 11.2B | 28.36 | $0.25 | +0.51% |
| IMPUF | $8.55 | -5.03% | 7.7B | -7.99 | -$1.07 | N/A |
| IMPUY | $8.36 | -6.44% | 7.5B | -7.81 | -$1.07 | N/A |
| OICT | $11.29 | N/A | 6.2B | -38.52 | -$0.29 | N/A |
| NMPNF | $11.00 | N/A | 4.2B | 5.83 | $1.89 | N/A |
| JINFF | $8.95 | -1.97% | 3.5B | 20.34 | $0.44 | +0.88% |
| GMINF | $14.60 | -0.21% | 3.3B | 28.08 | $0.52 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
NAUFF vs AUXIF Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, AUXIF has a market cap of 50.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while AUXIF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas AUXIF's P/E ratio is 0.10. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to AUXIF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is less volatile compared to AUXIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs FNLPF Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, FNLPF has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while FNLPF trades at $19.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas FNLPF's P/E ratio is 103.42. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to FNLPF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to FNLPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs ANGPY Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, ANGPY has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while ANGPY trades at $7.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas ANGPY's P/E ratio is 28.36. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ANGPY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to ANGPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs IMPUF Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, IMPUF has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while IMPUF trades at $8.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas IMPUF's P/E ratio is -7.99. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to IMPUF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to IMPUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs IMPUY Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, IMPUY has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while IMPUY trades at $8.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas IMPUY's P/E ratio is -7.81. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to IMPUY's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to IMPUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs OICT Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, OICT has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while OICT trades at $11.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas OICT's P/E ratio is -38.52. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to OICT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is less volatile compared to OICT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs NMPNF Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, NMPNF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while NMPNF trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas NMPNF's P/E ratio is 5.83. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to NMPNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to NMPNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs JINFF Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, JINFF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while JINFF trades at $8.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas JINFF's P/E ratio is 20.34. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to JINFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to JINFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs GMINF Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, GMINF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while GMINF trades at $14.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas GMINF's P/E ratio is 28.08. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to GMINF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to GMINF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs POYYF Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, POYYF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while POYYF trades at $3.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas POYYF's P/E ratio is -5.07. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to POYYF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to POYYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs AUCOY Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, AUCOY has a market cap of 899.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while AUCOY trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas AUCOY's P/E ratio is 4.04. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to AUCOY's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to AUCOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs ZMPLF Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, ZMPLF has a market cap of 838.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while ZMPLF trades at $7.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas ZMPLF's P/E ratio is 38.95. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ZMPLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to ZMPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs GLGDF Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, GLGDF has a market cap of 535.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while GLGDF trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas GLGDF's P/E ratio is 163.70. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to GLGDF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to GLGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs ABBRF Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, ABBRF has a market cap of 429.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while ABBRF trades at $3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas ABBRF's P/E ratio is -29.82. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ABBRF's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to ABBRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs TPRFF Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, TPRFF has a market cap of 332M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while TPRFF trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas TPRFF's P/E ratio is -4.48. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to TPRFF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to TPRFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs GOTRF Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, GOTRF has a market cap of 260.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while GOTRF trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas GOTRF's P/E ratio is -8.53. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to GOTRF's ROE of -5.41%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to GOTRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs SAPLF Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, SAPLF has a market cap of 256.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while SAPLF trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas SAPLF's P/E ratio is 24.63. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SAPLF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to SAPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs TIHRF Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, TIHRF has a market cap of 245M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while TIHRF trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas TIHRF's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to TIHRF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is less volatile compared to TIHRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs BRVMF Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, BRVMF has a market cap of 222.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while BRVMF trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas BRVMF's P/E ratio is -74.00. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BRVMF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to BRVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs SLVTF Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, SLVTF has a market cap of 141.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while SLVTF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas SLVTF's P/E ratio is -34.49. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SLVTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to SLVTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs IAUFF Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, IAUFF has a market cap of 126.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while IAUFF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas IAUFF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to IAUFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is less volatile compared to IAUFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs PAASF Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, PAASF has a market cap of 115.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while PAASF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas PAASF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to PAASF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to PAASF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs PLLHF Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, PLLHF has a market cap of 114.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while PLLHF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas PLLHF's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to PLLHF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is less volatile compared to PLLHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs BOCOF Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, BOCOF has a market cap of 112.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while BOCOF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas BOCOF's P/E ratio is -28.00. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BOCOF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to BOCOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs CTNXF Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, CTNXF has a market cap of 105.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while CTNXF trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas CTNXF's P/E ratio is -17.88. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CTNXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to CTNXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs XANAF Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, XANAF has a market cap of 102.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while XANAF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas XANAF's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to XANAF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is less volatile compared to XANAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs ADYRF Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, ADYRF has a market cap of 102M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while ADYRF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas ADYRF's P/E ratio is -16.77. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ADYRF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to ADYRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs BKRRF Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, BKRRF has a market cap of 90.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while BKRRF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas BKRRF's P/E ratio is -7.14. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BKRRF's ROE of -2.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to BKRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs SDRC Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, SDRC has a market cap of 87.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while SDRC trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas SDRC's P/E ratio is -233.30. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SDRC's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to SDRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs ARRKF Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, ARRKF has a market cap of 80.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while ARRKF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas ARRKF's P/E ratio is -22.64. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ARRKF's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to ARRKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs LUCRF Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, LUCRF has a market cap of 77.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while LUCRF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas LUCRF's P/E ratio is 1.72. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to LUCRF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to LUCRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs INMNF Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, INMNF has a market cap of 77M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while INMNF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas INMNF's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to INMNF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to INMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs CAPTF Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, CAPTF has a market cap of 67.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while CAPTF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas CAPTF's P/E ratio is -34.51. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CAPTF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to CAPTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs CHPGF Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, CHPGF has a market cap of 67.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while CHPGF trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas CHPGF's P/E ratio is -37.13. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CHPGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to CHPGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs OCGSF Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, OCGSF has a market cap of 66.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while OCGSF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas OCGSF's P/E ratio is -5.89. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to OCGSF's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is less volatile compared to OCGSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs PDLMF Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, PDLMF has a market cap of 65.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while PDLMF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas PDLMF's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to PDLMF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is less volatile compared to PDLMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs SSVFF Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, SSVFF has a market cap of 64.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while SSVFF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas SSVFF's P/E ratio is -19.47. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SSVFF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to SSVFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs SMDRF Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, SMDRF has a market cap of 64M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while SMDRF trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas SMDRF's P/E ratio is -28.44. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SMDRF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to SMDRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs TSORF Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, TSORF has a market cap of 62.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while TSORF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas TSORF's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to TSORF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is less volatile compared to TSORF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs DNCVF Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, DNCVF has a market cap of 59.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while DNCVF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas DNCVF's P/E ratio is -20.37. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to DNCVF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to DNCVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs ORVMF Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, ORVMF has a market cap of 58M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while ORVMF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas ORVMF's P/E ratio is 42.46. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ORVMF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to ORVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs EMPYF Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, EMPYF has a market cap of 57.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while EMPYF trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas EMPYF's P/E ratio is 48.73. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to EMPYF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to EMPYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs PDIV Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, PDIV has a market cap of 54.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while PDIV trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas PDIV's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to PDIV's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to PDIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs FREDF Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, FREDF has a market cap of 53.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while FREDF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas FREDF's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to FREDF's ROE of +10.39%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is less volatile compared to FREDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs DNRSF Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, DNRSF has a market cap of 49.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while DNRSF trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas DNRSF's P/E ratio is -3.21. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to DNRSF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to DNRSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs VLMGF Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, VLMGF has a market cap of 43.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while VLMGF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas VLMGF's P/E ratio is -39.52. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to VLMGF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to VLMGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs ELRFF Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, ELRFF has a market cap of 41.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while ELRFF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas ELRFF's P/E ratio is -2.56. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ELRFF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is less volatile compared to ELRFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs ACKRF Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, ACKRF has a market cap of 40.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while ACKRF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas ACKRF's P/E ratio is 8.49. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ACKRF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to ACKRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs TEUTF Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, TEUTF has a market cap of 39.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while TEUTF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas TEUTF's P/E ratio is -17.23. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to TEUTF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to TEUTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs DYNR Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, DYNR has a market cap of 39.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while DYNR trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas DYNR's P/E ratio is -10.38. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to DYNR's ROE of -1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to DYNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs KDKCF Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, KDKCF has a market cap of 38.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while KDKCF trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas KDKCF's P/E ratio is -15.03. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to KDKCF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to KDKCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs BBBXF Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, BBBXF has a market cap of 38.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while BBBXF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas BBBXF's P/E ratio is -7.22. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BBBXF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is less volatile compared to BBBXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs HMRRF Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, HMRRF has a market cap of 35.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while HMRRF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas HMRRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to HMRRF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to HMRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs FCSUF Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, FCSUF has a market cap of 34.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while FCSUF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas FCSUF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to FCSUF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to FCSUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs MMNGF Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, MMNGF has a market cap of 33.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while MMNGF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas MMNGF's P/E ratio is -18.90. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to MMNGF's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to MMNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs EQMEF Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, EQMEF has a market cap of 33.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while EQMEF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas EQMEF's P/E ratio is -8.53. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to EQMEF's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to EQMEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs TBXXF Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, TBXXF has a market cap of 32.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while TBXXF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas TBXXF's P/E ratio is -3.99. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to TBXXF's ROE of -4.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is less volatile compared to TBXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs OKPRF Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, OKPRF has a market cap of 31.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while OKPRF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas OKPRF's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to OKPRF's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is less volatile compared to OKPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs SCTSF Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, SCTSF has a market cap of 31.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while SCTSF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas SCTSF's P/E ratio is -6.36. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SCTSF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to SCTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs ATEPF Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, ATEPF has a market cap of 31.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while ATEPF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas ATEPF's P/E ratio is -16.94. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ATEPF's ROE of -2.60%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is less volatile compared to ATEPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs TLSMF Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, TLSMF has a market cap of 30.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while TLSMF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas TLSMF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to TLSMF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is less volatile compared to TLSMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs ACRG Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, ACRG has a market cap of 28.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while ACRG trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas ACRG's P/E ratio is -11.11. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ACRG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is less volatile compared to ACRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs SSVRF Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, SSVRF has a market cap of 28.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while SSVRF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas SSVRF's P/E ratio is -23.62. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SSVRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to SSVRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs SMOFF Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, SMOFF has a market cap of 28.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while SMOFF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas SMOFF's P/E ratio is -13.20. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SMOFF's ROE of +22.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to SMOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs HEGLF Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, HEGLF has a market cap of 28.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while HEGLF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas HEGLF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to HEGLF's ROE of +1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to HEGLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs AGLDF Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, AGLDF has a market cap of 27.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while AGLDF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas AGLDF's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to AGLDF's ROE of -1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to AGLDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs CTMCF Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, CTMCF has a market cap of 25.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while CTMCF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas CTMCF's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CTMCF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to CTMCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs GLDRF Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, GLDRF has a market cap of 25.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while GLDRF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas GLDRF's P/E ratio is -6.25. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to GLDRF's ROE of -17.55%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is less volatile compared to GLDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs SHGDF Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, SHGDF has a market cap of 25.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while SHGDF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas SHGDF's P/E ratio is -4.08. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SHGDF's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to SHGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs GBRRF Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, GBRRF has a market cap of 25.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while GBRRF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas GBRRF's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to GBRRF's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to GBRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs EMPPF Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, EMPPF has a market cap of 25M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while EMPPF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas EMPPF's P/E ratio is -10.90. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to EMPPF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to EMPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs MRZLF Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, MRZLF has a market cap of 24.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while MRZLF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas MRZLF's P/E ratio is -3.35. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to MRZLF's ROE of -2.53%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to MRZLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs GSMGF Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, GSMGF has a market cap of 23.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while GSMGF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas GSMGF's P/E ratio is 0.74. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to GSMGF's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to GSMGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs PVGDF Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, PVGDF has a market cap of 23.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while PVGDF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas PVGDF's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to PVGDF's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to PVGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs AUCUF Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, AUCUF has a market cap of 23.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while AUCUF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas AUCUF's P/E ratio is -10.25. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to AUCUF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to AUCUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs PNTRF Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, PNTRF has a market cap of 23.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while PNTRF trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas PNTRF's P/E ratio is -41.00. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to PNTRF's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to PNTRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs GMDMF Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, GMDMF has a market cap of 22.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while GMDMF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas GMDMF's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to GMDMF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to GMDMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs WEXPF Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, WEXPF has a market cap of 21.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while WEXPF trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas WEXPF's P/E ratio is -3.45. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to WEXPF's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to WEXPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs URVNF Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, URVNF has a market cap of 20.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while URVNF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas URVNF's P/E ratio is 43.33. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to URVNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to URVNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs MERG Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, MERG has a market cap of 19.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while MERG trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas MERG's P/E ratio is -5.66. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to MERG's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is less volatile compared to MERG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs HGLD Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, HGLD has a market cap of 18.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while HGLD trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas HGLD's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to HGLD's ROE of -5.37%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to HGLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs LGCXF Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, LGCXF has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while LGCXF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas LGCXF's P/E ratio is -6.25. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to LGCXF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is less volatile compared to LGCXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs RKHNF Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, RKHNF has a market cap of 17.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while RKHNF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas RKHNF's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to RKHNF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is less volatile compared to RKHNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs BRGC Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, BRGC has a market cap of 17.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while BRGC trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas BRGC's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BRGC's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to BRGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs VOYRF Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, VOYRF has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while VOYRF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas VOYRF's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to VOYRF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is less volatile compared to VOYRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs CJIMF Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, CJIMF has a market cap of 16.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while CJIMF trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas CJIMF's P/E ratio is -33.00. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CJIMF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is less volatile compared to CJIMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs AUSVF Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, AUSVF has a market cap of 16.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while AUSVF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas AUSVF's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to AUSVF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to AUSVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs SEKZF Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, SEKZF has a market cap of 16.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while SEKZF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas SEKZF's P/E ratio is -3.78. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SEKZF's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is less volatile compared to SEKZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs BYRG Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, BYRG has a market cap of 16.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while BYRG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas BYRG's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BYRG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to BYRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs ESGLF Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, ESGLF has a market cap of 16.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while ESGLF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas ESGLF's P/E ratio is -6.70. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ESGLF's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to ESGLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs SUNPF Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, SUNPF has a market cap of 14.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while SUNPF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas SUNPF's P/E ratio is -8.37. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SUNPF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to SUNPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs KGFMF Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, KGFMF has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while KGFMF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas KGFMF's P/E ratio is -11.71. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to KGFMF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to KGFMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs STRFF Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, STRFF has a market cap of 13.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while STRFF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas STRFF's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to STRFF's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to STRFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs THMG Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, THMG has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while THMG trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas THMG's P/E ratio is -18.05. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to THMG's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to THMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs WAMFF Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, WAMFF has a market cap of 12.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while WAMFF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas WAMFF's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to WAMFF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is less volatile compared to WAMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs BWCGF Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, BWCGF has a market cap of 12.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while BWCGF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas BWCGF's P/E ratio is -1.68. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BWCGF's ROE of -1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to BWCGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs TSLVF Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, TSLVF has a market cap of 12.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while TSLVF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas TSLVF's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to TSLVF's ROE of -3.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to TSLVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs MHTZF Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, MHTZF has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while MHTZF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas MHTZF's P/E ratio is -5.12. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to MHTZF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to MHTZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.
NAUFF vs CNRIF Comparison
NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 23.7M. In comparison, CNRIF has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.26, while CNRIF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.52, whereas CNRIF's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CNRIF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to CNRIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.