NevGold Corp.

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, FNLPF has a market cap of 39B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while FNLPF trades at $52.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas FNLPF's P/E ratio is 85.39. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to FNLPF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to FNLPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check FNLPF's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, ANGPY has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while ANGPY trades at $15.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas ANGPY's P/E ratio is 319.20. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ANGPY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to ANGPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check ANGPY's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, IMPUY has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while IMPUY trades at $17.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas IMPUY's P/E ratio is 368.30. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to IMPUY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to IMPUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check IMPUY's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, IMPUF has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while IMPUF trades at $17.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas IMPUF's P/E ratio is 357.00. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to IMPUF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to IMPUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check IMPUF's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, MMSMY has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while MMSMY trades at $39.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas MMSMY's P/E ratio is 38.21. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to MMSMY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to MMSMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check MMSMY's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, XZJCF has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while XZJCF trades at $183.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas XZJCF's P/E ratio is 34.40. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to XZJCF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to XZJCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check XZJCF's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, JINFF has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while JINFF trades at $24.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas JINFF's P/E ratio is 24.29. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to JINFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to JINFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check JINFF's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, GMINF has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while GMINF trades at $35.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas GMINF's P/E ratio is 32.08. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to GMINF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to GMINF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check GMINF's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, OICT has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while OICT trades at $11.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas OICT's P/E ratio is -39.25. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to OICT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to OICT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check OICT's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, NMPNF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while NMPNF trades at $11.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas NMPNF's P/E ratio is 5.83. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to NMPNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to NMPNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check NMPNF's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, ZMPLF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while ZMPLF trades at $14.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas ZMPLF's P/E ratio is 38.21. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ZMPLF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to ZMPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check ZMPLF's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, POYYF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while POYYF trades at $3.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas POYYF's P/E ratio is -5.07. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to POYYF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to POYYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check POYYF's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, ABBRF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while ABBRF trades at $10.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas ABBRF's P/E ratio is -99.55. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ABBRF's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is less volatile compared to ABBRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check ABBRF's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, GLGDF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while GLGDF trades at $2.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas GLGDF's P/E ratio is 33.25. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to GLGDF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is less volatile compared to GLGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check GLGDF's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, AUCOY has a market cap of 899.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while AUCOY trades at $1.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas AUCOY's P/E ratio is 4.04. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to AUCOY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is less volatile compared to AUCOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check AUCOY's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, TIHRF has a market cap of 579.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while TIHRF trades at $1.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas TIHRF's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to TIHRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to TIHRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check TIHRF's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, FCSUF has a market cap of 578.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while FCSUF trades at $2.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas FCSUF's P/E ratio is 18.36. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to FCSUF's ROE of +1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to FCSUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check FCSUF's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, BKRRF has a market cap of 404.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while BKRRF trades at $1.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas BKRRF's P/E ratio is -19.50. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to BKRRF's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is less volatile compared to BKRRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check BKRRF's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, SAPLF has a market cap of 396.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while SAPLF trades at $1.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas SAPLF's P/E ratio is 19.06. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SAPLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to SAPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check SAPLF's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, SLVTF has a market cap of 363.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while SLVTF trades at $0.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas SLVTF's P/E ratio is -71.50. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SLVTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is less volatile compared to SLVTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check SLVTF's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, IAUFF has a market cap of 343M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while IAUFF trades at $0.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas IAUFF's P/E ratio is 21.50. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to IAUFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to IAUFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check IAUFF's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, BRVMF has a market cap of 337.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while BRVMF trades at $2.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas BRVMF's P/E ratio is -102.00. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to BRVMF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is less volatile compared to BRVMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check BRVMF's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, TPRFF has a market cap of 332M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while TPRFF trades at $2.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas TPRFF's P/E ratio is -4.48. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to TPRFF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to TPRFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check TPRFF's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, GOTRF has a market cap of 285.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while GOTRF trades at $1.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas GOTRF's P/E ratio is -12.77. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to GOTRF's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is less volatile compared to GOTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check GOTRF's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, HGLD has a market cap of 281.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while HGLD trades at $0.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas HGLD's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to HGLD's ROE of -4.38%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is less volatile compared to HGLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check HGLD's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, CHPGF has a market cap of 269.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while CHPGF trades at $2.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas CHPGF's P/E ratio is -87.50. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CHPGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is less volatile compared to CHPGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check CHPGF's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, SMDRF has a market cap of 267M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while SMDRF trades at $1.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas SMDRF's P/E ratio is -167.10. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SMDRF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is less volatile compared to SMDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check SMDRF's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, PAASF has a market cap of 259.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while PAASF trades at $0.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas PAASF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to PAASF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is less volatile compared to PAASF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check PAASF's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, SSVFF has a market cap of 231.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while SSVFF trades at $0.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas SSVFF's P/E ratio is -28.75. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SSVFF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is less volatile compared to SSVFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check SSVFF's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, CAPTF has a market cap of 189.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while CAPTF trades at $1.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas CAPTF's P/E ratio is -173.00. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CAPTF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is less volatile compared to CAPTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check CAPTF's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, ORVMF has a market cap of 168M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while ORVMF trades at $1.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas ORVMF's P/E ratio is -8.20. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ORVMF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to ORVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check ORVMF's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, SNNGF has a market cap of 167.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while SNNGF trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas SNNGF's P/E ratio is -8.33. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SNNGF's ROE of +4.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to SNNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check SNNGF's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, BOCOF has a market cap of 160.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while BOCOF trades at $0.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas BOCOF's P/E ratio is -40.00. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to BOCOF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to BOCOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check BOCOF's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, TBXXF has a market cap of 150.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while TBXXF trades at $0.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas TBXXF's P/E ratio is -18.12. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to TBXXF's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is less volatile compared to TBXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check TBXXF's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, XANAF has a market cap of 137.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while XANAF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas XANAF's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to XANAF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to XANAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check XANAF's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, PLLHF has a market cap of 135.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while PLLHF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas PLLHF's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to PLLHF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to PLLHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check PLLHF's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, TSORF has a market cap of 127.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while TSORF trades at $0.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas TSORF's P/E ratio is -121.07. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to TSORF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to TSORF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check TSORF's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, OCGSF has a market cap of 126.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while OCGSF trades at $0.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas OCGSF's P/E ratio is -8.34. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to OCGSF's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is less volatile compared to OCGSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check OCGSF's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, EMPYF has a market cap of 115.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while EMPYF trades at $0.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas EMPYF's P/E ratio is 30.17. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to EMPYF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is less volatile compared to EMPYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check EMPYF's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, SDRC has a market cap of 112.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while SDRC trades at $0.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas SDRC's P/E ratio is -299.40. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SDRC's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is less volatile compared to SDRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check SDRC's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, SCTSF has a market cap of 108.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while SCTSF trades at $1.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas SCTSF's P/E ratio is -9.45. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SCTSF's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is less volatile compared to SCTSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check SCTSF's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, CTNXF has a market cap of 105.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while CTNXF trades at $2.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas CTNXF's P/E ratio is -17.88. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CTNXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to CTNXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check CTNXF's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, AGLDF has a market cap of 104.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while AGLDF trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas AGLDF's P/E ratio is -8.50. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to AGLDF's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is less volatile compared to AGLDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check AGLDF's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, PGLDF has a market cap of 95.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while PGLDF trades at $0.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas PGLDF's P/E ratio is 30.75. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to PGLDF's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is less volatile compared to PGLDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check PGLDF's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, LUCRF has a market cap of 94.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while LUCRF trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas LUCRF's P/E ratio is 1.73. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to LUCRF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to LUCRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check LUCRF's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, AMNP has a market cap of 92.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while AMNP trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas AMNP's P/E ratio is -10.50. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to AMNP's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to AMNP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check AMNP's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, DNCVF has a market cap of 89.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while DNCVF trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas DNCVF's P/E ratio is -24.62. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to DNCVF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is less volatile compared to DNCVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check DNCVF's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, VIPRF has a market cap of 88.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while VIPRF trades at $1.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas VIPRF's P/E ratio is -9.14. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to VIPRF's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is less volatile compared to VIPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check VIPRF's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, TEUTF has a market cap of 86.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while TEUTF trades at $1.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas TEUTF's P/E ratio is -29.00. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to TEUTF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to TEUTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check TEUTF's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, ACRG has a market cap of 83.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while ACRG trades at $6.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas ACRG's P/E ratio is -13.33. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ACRG's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to ACRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check ACRG's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, LGCXF has a market cap of 81.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while LGCXF trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas LGCXF's P/E ratio is -23.10. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to LGCXF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is less volatile compared to LGCXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check LGCXF's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, AGMRF has a market cap of 80.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while AGMRF trades at $3.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas AGMRF's P/E ratio is -6.35. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to AGMRF's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is less volatile compared to AGMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check AGMRF's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, THMG has a market cap of 74.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while THMG trades at $0.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas THMG's P/E ratio is -39.73. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to THMG's ROE of +8.97%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is less volatile compared to THMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check THMG's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, VLMGF has a market cap of 70.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while VLMGF trades at $0.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas VLMGF's P/E ratio is -62.00. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to VLMGF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to VLMGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check VLMGF's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, ELRFF has a market cap of 69.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while ELRFF trades at $0.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas ELRFF's P/E ratio is -3.10. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ELRFF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is less volatile compared to ELRFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check ELRFF's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, HEGLF has a market cap of 68.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while HEGLF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas HEGLF's P/E ratio is -2.23. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to HEGLF's ROE of -7.48%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to HEGLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check HEGLF's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, KDKCF has a market cap of 68.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while KDKCF trades at $0.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas KDKCF's P/E ratio is -71.37. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to KDKCF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is less volatile compared to KDKCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check KDKCF's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, LBCMF has a market cap of 66.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while LBCMF trades at $0.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas LBCMF's P/E ratio is -3.81. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to LBCMF's ROE of -6.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is less volatile compared to LBCMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check LBCMF's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, CPPMF has a market cap of 66.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while CPPMF trades at $0.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas CPPMF's P/E ratio is -9.11. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CPPMF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to CPPMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check CPPMF's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, ARRKF has a market cap of 62M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while ARRKF trades at $0.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas ARRKF's P/E ratio is -4.68. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ARRKF's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to ARRKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check ARRKF's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, MMNGF has a market cap of 61.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while MMNGF trades at $0.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas MMNGF's P/E ratio is -29.00. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to MMNGF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is less volatile compared to MMNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check MMNGF's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, EQMEF has a market cap of 58.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while EQMEF trades at $0.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas EQMEF's P/E ratio is -29.42. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to EQMEF's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is less volatile compared to EQMEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check EQMEF's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, EMPPF has a market cap of 57.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while EMPPF trades at $0.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas EMPPF's P/E ratio is -15.91. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to EMPPF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to EMPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check EMPPF's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, BRGC has a market cap of 55.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while BRGC trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas BRGC's P/E ratio is 0.07. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to BRGC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is less volatile compared to BRGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check BRGC's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, ACKRF has a market cap of 54.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while ACKRF trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas ACKRF's P/E ratio is 11.40. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ACKRF's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is less volatile compared to ACKRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check ACKRF's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, PDLMF has a market cap of 52.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while PDLMF trades at $0.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas PDLMF's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to PDLMF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to PDLMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check PDLMF's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, VTXXF has a market cap of 52M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while VTXXF trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas VTXXF's P/E ratio is -10.55. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to VTXXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to VTXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check VTXXF's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, SMOFF has a market cap of 51M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while SMOFF trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas SMOFF's P/E ratio is -9.81. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SMOFF's ROE of -5.71%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is less volatile compared to SMOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check SMOFF's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, CTMCF has a market cap of 50.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while CTMCF trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas CTMCF's P/E ratio is -13.83. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CTMCF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to CTMCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check CTMCF's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, KGFMF has a market cap of 49.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while KGFMF trades at $0.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas KGFMF's P/E ratio is -56.00. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to KGFMF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is less volatile compared to KGFMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check KGFMF's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, ATEPF has a market cap of 46.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while ATEPF trades at $0.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas ATEPF's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ATEPF's ROE of -1.81%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is less volatile compared to ATEPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check ATEPF's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, ADYRF has a market cap of 43.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while ADYRF trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas ADYRF's P/E ratio is -8.50. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ADYRF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to ADYRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check ADYRF's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, RKHNF has a market cap of 41M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while RKHNF trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas RKHNF's P/E ratio is -14.00. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to RKHNF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to RKHNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check RKHNF's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, DNRSF has a market cap of 40.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while DNRSF trades at $0.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas DNRSF's P/E ratio is -3.53. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to DNRSF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is less volatile compared to DNRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check DNRSF's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, PNTRF has a market cap of 40M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while PNTRF trades at $0.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas PNTRF's P/E ratio is -60.00. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to PNTRF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to PNTRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check PNTRF's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, PVGDF has a market cap of 38.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while PVGDF trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas PVGDF's P/E ratio is -22.09. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to PVGDF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is less volatile compared to PVGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check PVGDF's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, DYNR has a market cap of 38.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while DYNR trades at $1.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas DYNR's P/E ratio is 14.67. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to DYNR's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to DYNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check DYNR's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, SSVRF has a market cap of 38.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while SSVRF trades at $0.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas SSVRF's P/E ratio is -15.60. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SSVRF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to SSVRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check SSVRF's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, MRZLF has a market cap of 36.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while MRZLF trades at $0.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas MRZLF's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to MRZLF's ROE of -8.57%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to MRZLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check MRZLF's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, HMRRF has a market cap of 35.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while HMRRF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas HMRRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to HMRRF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to HMRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check HMRRF's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, RITE has a market cap of 35.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while RITE trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas RITE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to RITE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is less volatile compared to RITE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check RITE's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, CJIMF has a market cap of 34.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while CJIMF trades at $0.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas CJIMF's P/E ratio is -67.90. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CJIMF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to CJIMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check CJIMF's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, SUNPF has a market cap of 34M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while SUNPF trades at $0.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas SUNPF's P/E ratio is -39.00. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SUNPF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to SUNPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check SUNPF's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, WAMFF has a market cap of 32.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while WAMFF trades at $0.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas WAMFF's P/E ratio is -12.11. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to WAMFF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is less volatile compared to WAMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check WAMFF's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, OKPRF has a market cap of 31.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while OKPRF trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas OKPRF's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to OKPRF's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is less volatile compared to OKPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check OKPRF's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, WEXPF has a market cap of 31.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while WEXPF trades at $0.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas WEXPF's P/E ratio is -5.99. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to WEXPF's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is less volatile compared to WEXPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check WEXPF's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, MHTZF has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while MHTZF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas MHTZF's P/E ratio is -5.57. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to MHTZF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to MHTZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check MHTZF's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, TLSMF has a market cap of 30.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while TLSMF trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas TLSMF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to TLSMF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to TLSMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check TLSMF's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, ZLME has a market cap of 29.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while ZLME trades at $8.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas ZLME's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ZLME's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. NAUFF has daily volatility of 3.58 and ZLME has daily volatility of N/A.Check ZLME's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, GLDRF has a market cap of 25.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while GLDRF trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas GLDRF's P/E ratio is -6.25. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to GLDRF's ROE of -17.55%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is less volatile compared to GLDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check GLDRF's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, ASLRF has a market cap of 25M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while ASLRF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas ASLRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ASLRF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to ASLRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check ASLRF's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, STRFF has a market cap of 25M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while STRFF trades at $0.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas STRFF's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to STRFF's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is less volatile compared to STRFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check STRFF's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, ESGLF has a market cap of 24.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while ESGLF trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas ESGLF's P/E ratio is -9.21. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ESGLF's ROE of +2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is less volatile compared to ESGLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check ESGLF's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, SBMCF has a market cap of 24.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while SBMCF trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas SBMCF's P/E ratio is -3.43. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SBMCF's ROE of +15.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is less volatile compared to SBMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check SBMCF's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, AUCUF has a market cap of 22.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while AUCUF trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas AUCUF's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to AUCUF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is less volatile compared to AUCUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check AUCUF's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, URVNF has a market cap of 20.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while URVNF trades at $0.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas URVNF's P/E ratio is 43.33. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to URVNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is less volatile compared to URVNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check URVNF's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, SHGDF has a market cap of 19.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while SHGDF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas SHGDF's P/E ratio is -2.57. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SHGDF's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is more volatile compared to SHGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check SHGDF's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, SBLRF has a market cap of 18.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while SBLRF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas SBLRF's P/E ratio is 1.46. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SBLRF's ROE of +5.94%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is less volatile compared to SBLRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check SBLRF's competition here

NAUFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAUFF stands at 113.8M. In comparison, PLLMF has a market cap of 18.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUFF is priced at $0.83, while PLLMF trades at $0.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAUFF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.39, whereas PLLMF's P/E ratio is 3.50. In terms of profitability, NAUFF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to PLLMF's ROE of +1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUFF is less volatile compared to PLLMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUFF.Check PLLMF's competition here