Nagarro SE
Nagarro SE NA9.F Peers
See (NA9.F) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Information Technology Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NA9.F | $70.20 | -1.13% | 935.21M | 17.25 | $4.07 | +2.74% |
| IBM.DE | $236.25 | +2.76% | 219.57B | 44.74 | $5.28 | +2.41% |
| FIV.DE | $219.40 | +0.27% | 126.31B | 62.87 | $3.49 | N/A |
| COZ.DE | $84.46 | -0.68% | 41.63B | 19.78 | $4.27 | +1.33% |
| BC8.DE | $38.98 | -0.15% | 4.91B | 21.66 | $1.80 | +1.80% |
| NB2.DE | $26.60 | -2.64% | 1.71B | -12.04 | -$2.21 | N/A |
| NB2.F | $26.32 | -3.24% | 1.69B | -11.91 | -$2.21 | N/A |
| 4018.F | $1,047.00 | +1.16% | 1.64B | 60.94 | $17.18 | N/A |
| 217A.F | $5.30 | -4.50% | 1.40B | 265.00 | $0.02 | N/A |
| DE000A3H2200.SG | $70.05 | +1.89% | 933.22M | N/A | N/A | +2.74% |
Stock Comparison
NA9.F vs IBM.DE Comparison
NA9.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA9.F stands at 935.21M. In comparison, IBM.DE has a market cap of 219.57B. Regarding current trading prices, NA9.F is priced at $70.20, while IBM.DE trades at $236.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA9.F currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas IBM.DE's P/E ratio is 44.74. In terms of profitability, NA9.F's ROE is +0.26%, compared to IBM.DE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NA9.F is less volatile compared to IBM.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA9.F.
NA9.F vs FIV.DE Comparison
NA9.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA9.F stands at 935.21M. In comparison, FIV.DE has a market cap of 126.31B. Regarding current trading prices, NA9.F is priced at $70.20, while FIV.DE trades at $219.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA9.F currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas FIV.DE's P/E ratio is 62.87. In terms of profitability, NA9.F's ROE is +0.26%, compared to FIV.DE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NA9.F is more volatile compared to FIV.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA9.F.
NA9.F vs COZ.DE Comparison
NA9.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA9.F stands at 935.21M. In comparison, COZ.DE has a market cap of 41.63B. Regarding current trading prices, NA9.F is priced at $70.20, while COZ.DE trades at $84.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA9.F currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas COZ.DE's P/E ratio is 19.78. In terms of profitability, NA9.F's ROE is +0.26%, compared to COZ.DE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NA9.F is more volatile compared to COZ.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA9.F.
NA9.F vs BC8.DE Comparison
NA9.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA9.F stands at 935.21M. In comparison, BC8.DE has a market cap of 4.91B. Regarding current trading prices, NA9.F is priced at $70.20, while BC8.DE trades at $38.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA9.F currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas BC8.DE's P/E ratio is 21.66. In terms of profitability, NA9.F's ROE is +0.26%, compared to BC8.DE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NA9.F is less volatile compared to BC8.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA9.F.
NA9.F vs NB2.DE Comparison
NA9.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA9.F stands at 935.21M. In comparison, NB2.DE has a market cap of 1.71B. Regarding current trading prices, NA9.F is priced at $70.20, while NB2.DE trades at $26.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA9.F currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas NB2.DE's P/E ratio is -12.04. In terms of profitability, NA9.F's ROE is +0.26%, compared to NB2.DE's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NA9.F is less volatile compared to NB2.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA9.F.
NA9.F vs NB2.F Comparison
NA9.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA9.F stands at 935.21M. In comparison, NB2.F has a market cap of 1.69B. Regarding current trading prices, NA9.F is priced at $70.20, while NB2.F trades at $26.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA9.F currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas NB2.F's P/E ratio is -11.91. In terms of profitability, NA9.F's ROE is +0.26%, compared to NB2.F's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NA9.F is less volatile compared to NB2.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA9.F.
NA9.F vs 4018.F Comparison
NA9.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA9.F stands at 935.21M. In comparison, 4018.F has a market cap of 1.64B. Regarding current trading prices, NA9.F is priced at $70.20, while 4018.F trades at $1,047.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA9.F currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas 4018.F's P/E ratio is 60.94. In terms of profitability, NA9.F's ROE is +0.26%, compared to 4018.F's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NA9.F is less volatile compared to 4018.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA9.F.
NA9.F vs 217A.F Comparison
NA9.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA9.F stands at 935.21M. In comparison, 217A.F has a market cap of 1.40B. Regarding current trading prices, NA9.F is priced at $70.20, while 217A.F trades at $5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA9.F currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas 217A.F's P/E ratio is 265.00. In terms of profitability, NA9.F's ROE is +0.26%, compared to 217A.F's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NA9.F is less volatile compared to 217A.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA9.F.
NA9.F vs DE000A3H2200.SG Comparison
NA9.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA9.F stands at 935.21M. In comparison, DE000A3H2200.SG has a market cap of 933.22M. Regarding current trading prices, NA9.F is priced at $70.20, while DE000A3H2200.SG trades at $70.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA9.F currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas DE000A3H2200.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NA9.F's ROE is +0.26%, compared to DE000A3H2200.SG's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NA9.F is less volatile compared to DE000A3H2200.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA9.F.
NA9.F vs NA9.DE Comparison
NA9.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA9.F stands at 935.21M. In comparison, NA9.DE has a market cap of 923.22M. Regarding current trading prices, NA9.F is priced at $70.20, while NA9.DE trades at $69.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA9.F currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas NA9.DE's P/E ratio is 17.03. In terms of profitability, NA9.F's ROE is +0.26%, compared to NA9.DE's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NA9.F is less volatile compared to NA9.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA9.F.
NA9.F vs COK.DE Comparison
NA9.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA9.F stands at 935.21M. In comparison, COK.DE has a market cap of 904.49M. Regarding current trading prices, NA9.F is priced at $70.20, while COK.DE trades at $28.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA9.F currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas COK.DE's P/E ratio is 28.99. In terms of profitability, NA9.F's ROE is +0.26%, compared to COK.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NA9.F is less volatile compared to COK.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA9.F.
NA9.F vs CHG.DE Comparison
NA9.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA9.F stands at 935.21M. In comparison, CHG.DE has a market cap of 859.68M. Regarding current trading prices, NA9.F is priced at $70.20, while CHG.DE trades at $37.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA9.F currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas CHG.DE's P/E ratio is -138.52. In terms of profitability, NA9.F's ROE is +0.26%, compared to CHG.DE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NA9.F is less volatile compared to CHG.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA9.F.
NA9.F vs USY1.DE Comparison
NA9.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA9.F stands at 935.21M. In comparison, USY1.DE has a market cap of 700.57M. Regarding current trading prices, NA9.F is priced at $70.20, while USY1.DE trades at $10.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA9.F currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas USY1.DE's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, NA9.F's ROE is +0.26%, compared to USY1.DE's ROE of +4.89%. Regarding short-term risk, NA9.F is more volatile compared to USY1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA9.F.
NA9.F vs GFT.DE Comparison
NA9.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA9.F stands at 935.21M. In comparison, GFT.DE has a market cap of 650.25M. Regarding current trading prices, NA9.F is priced at $70.20, while GFT.DE trades at $24.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA9.F currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas GFT.DE's P/E ratio is 13.95. In terms of profitability, NA9.F's ROE is +0.26%, compared to GFT.DE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NA9.F is less volatile compared to GFT.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA9.F.
NA9.F vs ADN1.DE Comparison
NA9.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA9.F stands at 935.21M. In comparison, ADN1.DE has a market cap of 597.24M. Regarding current trading prices, NA9.F is priced at $70.20, while ADN1.DE trades at $93.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA9.F currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas ADN1.DE's P/E ratio is -845.45. In terms of profitability, NA9.F's ROE is +0.26%, compared to ADN1.DE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NA9.F is less volatile compared to ADN1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA9.F.
NA9.F vs D6H.DE Comparison
NA9.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA9.F stands at 935.21M. In comparison, D6H.DE has a market cap of 468.70M. Regarding current trading prices, NA9.F is priced at $70.20, while D6H.DE trades at $56.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA9.F currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas D6H.DE's P/E ratio is 19.25. In terms of profitability, NA9.F's ROE is +0.26%, compared to D6H.DE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NA9.F is more volatile compared to D6H.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA9.F.
NA9.F vs IXX.DE Comparison
NA9.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA9.F stands at 935.21M. In comparison, IXX.DE has a market cap of 390.11M. Regarding current trading prices, NA9.F is priced at $70.20, while IXX.DE trades at $39.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA9.F currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas IXX.DE's P/E ratio is 25.16. In terms of profitability, NA9.F's ROE is +0.26%, compared to IXX.DE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NA9.F is less volatile compared to IXX.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA9.F.
NA9.F vs A1OS.DE Comparison
NA9.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA9.F stands at 935.21M. In comparison, A1OS.DE has a market cap of 265.79M. Regarding current trading prices, NA9.F is priced at $70.20, while A1OS.DE trades at $54.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA9.F currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas A1OS.DE's P/E ratio is 14.76. In terms of profitability, NA9.F's ROE is +0.26%, compared to A1OS.DE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NA9.F is less volatile compared to A1OS.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA9.F.
NA9.F vs MCE.DE Comparison
NA9.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA9.F stands at 935.21M. In comparison, MCE.DE has a market cap of 232.64M. Regarding current trading prices, NA9.F is priced at $70.20, while MCE.DE trades at $14.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA9.F currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas MCE.DE's P/E ratio is -39.17. In terms of profitability, NA9.F's ROE is +0.26%, compared to MCE.DE's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NA9.F is more volatile compared to MCE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA9.F.
NA9.F vs AEIN.DE Comparison
NA9.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA9.F stands at 935.21M. In comparison, AEIN.DE has a market cap of 219.12M. Regarding current trading prices, NA9.F is priced at $70.20, while AEIN.DE trades at $19.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA9.F currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas AEIN.DE's P/E ratio is 26.90. In terms of profitability, NA9.F's ROE is +0.26%, compared to AEIN.DE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NA9.F is less volatile compared to AEIN.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA9.F.
NA9.F vs OSP2.DE Comparison
NA9.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA9.F stands at 935.21M. In comparison, OSP2.DE has a market cap of 185.17M. Regarding current trading prices, NA9.F is priced at $70.20, while OSP2.DE trades at $18.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA9.F currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas OSP2.DE's P/E ratio is 32.95. In terms of profitability, NA9.F's ROE is +0.26%, compared to OSP2.DE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NA9.F is more volatile compared to OSP2.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA9.F.
NA9.F vs 30L3.DE Comparison
NA9.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA9.F stands at 935.21M. In comparison, 30L3.DE has a market cap of 134.62M. Regarding current trading prices, NA9.F is priced at $70.20, while 30L3.DE trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA9.F currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas 30L3.DE's P/E ratio is 6.29. In terms of profitability, NA9.F's ROE is +0.26%, compared to 30L3.DE's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NA9.F is less volatile compared to 30L3.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA9.F.
NA9.F vs QBY.DE Comparison
NA9.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA9.F stands at 935.21M. In comparison, QBY.DE has a market cap of 120.34M. Regarding current trading prices, NA9.F is priced at $70.20, while QBY.DE trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA9.F currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas QBY.DE's P/E ratio is -24.15. In terms of profitability, NA9.F's ROE is +0.26%, compared to QBY.DE's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NA9.F is less volatile compared to QBY.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA9.F.
NA9.F vs 3IT.F Comparison
NA9.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA9.F stands at 935.21M. In comparison, 3IT.F has a market cap of 65.45M. Regarding current trading prices, NA9.F is priced at $70.20, while 3IT.F trades at $13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA9.F currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas 3IT.F's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, NA9.F's ROE is +0.26%, compared to 3IT.F's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NA9.F is more volatile compared to 3IT.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA9.F.
NA9.F vs 3IT.DE Comparison
NA9.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA9.F stands at 935.21M. In comparison, 3IT.DE has a market cap of 64.46M. Regarding current trading prices, NA9.F is priced at $70.20, while 3IT.DE trades at $13.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA9.F currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas 3IT.DE's P/E ratio is 18.71. In terms of profitability, NA9.F's ROE is +0.26%, compared to 3IT.DE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NA9.F is less volatile compared to 3IT.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA9.F.
NA9.F vs IE2A.F Comparison
NA9.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA9.F stands at 935.21M. In comparison, IE2A.F has a market cap of 63.85M. Regarding current trading prices, NA9.F is priced at $70.20, while IE2A.F trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA9.F currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas IE2A.F's P/E ratio is 5.35. In terms of profitability, NA9.F's ROE is +0.26%, compared to IE2A.F's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NA9.F is more volatile compared to IE2A.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA9.F.
NA9.F vs OBS.DE Comparison
NA9.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA9.F stands at 935.21M. In comparison, OBS.DE has a market cap of 59.18M. Regarding current trading prices, NA9.F is priced at $70.20, while OBS.DE trades at $6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA9.F currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas OBS.DE's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, NA9.F's ROE is +0.26%, compared to OBS.DE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NA9.F is more volatile compared to OBS.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA9.F.
NA9.F vs KSC.DE Comparison
NA9.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA9.F stands at 935.21M. In comparison, KSC.DE has a market cap of 34.73M. Regarding current trading prices, NA9.F is priced at $70.20, while KSC.DE trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA9.F currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas KSC.DE's P/E ratio is -1.48. In terms of profitability, NA9.F's ROE is +0.26%, compared to KSC.DE's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, NA9.F is less volatile compared to KSC.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA9.F.
NA9.F vs SYT.DE Comparison
NA9.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA9.F stands at 935.21M. In comparison, SYT.DE has a market cap of 30.37M. Regarding current trading prices, NA9.F is priced at $70.20, while SYT.DE trades at $3.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA9.F currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas SYT.DE's P/E ratio is -15.30. In terms of profitability, NA9.F's ROE is +0.26%, compared to SYT.DE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NA9.F is less volatile compared to SYT.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA9.F.
NA9.F vs T3T1.DE Comparison
NA9.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA9.F stands at 935.21M. In comparison, T3T1.DE has a market cap of 19.23M. Regarding current trading prices, NA9.F is priced at $70.20, while T3T1.DE trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA9.F currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas T3T1.DE's P/E ratio is 9.27. In terms of profitability, NA9.F's ROE is +0.26%, compared to T3T1.DE's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NA9.F is more volatile compared to T3T1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA9.F.
NA9.F vs PDA.DE Comparison
NA9.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA9.F stands at 935.21M. In comparison, PDA.DE has a market cap of 11.80M. Regarding current trading prices, NA9.F is priced at $70.20, while PDA.DE trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA9.F currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas PDA.DE's P/E ratio is 30.50. In terms of profitability, NA9.F's ROE is +0.26%, compared to PDA.DE's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, NA9.F is less volatile compared to PDA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA9.F.
NA9.F vs AMI.DE Comparison
NA9.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA9.F stands at 935.21M. In comparison, AMI.DE has a market cap of 6.04M. Regarding current trading prices, NA9.F is priced at $70.20, while AMI.DE trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA9.F currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas AMI.DE's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, NA9.F's ROE is +0.26%, compared to AMI.DE's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NA9.F is less volatile compared to AMI.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA9.F.
NA9.F vs RTC.DE Comparison
NA9.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA9.F stands at 935.21M. In comparison, RTC.DE has a market cap of 5.36M. Regarding current trading prices, NA9.F is priced at $70.20, while RTC.DE trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA9.F currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas RTC.DE's P/E ratio is 9.95. In terms of profitability, NA9.F's ROE is +0.26%, compared to RTC.DE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NA9.F is more volatile compared to RTC.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA9.F.
NA9.F vs AMI.F Comparison
NA9.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA9.F stands at 935.21M. In comparison, AMI.F has a market cap of 5.26M. Regarding current trading prices, NA9.F is priced at $70.20, while AMI.F trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA9.F currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas AMI.F's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, NA9.F's ROE is +0.26%, compared to AMI.F's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NA9.F is more volatile compared to AMI.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA9.F.
NA9.F vs ASKN.DE Comparison
NA9.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA9.F stands at 935.21M. In comparison, ASKN.DE has a market cap of 2.39M. Regarding current trading prices, NA9.F is priced at $70.20, while ASKN.DE trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA9.F currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas ASKN.DE's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, NA9.F's ROE is +0.26%, compared to ASKN.DE's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NA9.F is less volatile compared to ASKN.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA9.F.
NA9.F vs MDV.DU Comparison
NA9.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA9.F stands at 935.21M. In comparison, MDV.DU has a market cap of 1.55M. Regarding current trading prices, NA9.F is priced at $70.20, while MDV.DU trades at $6.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA9.F currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas MDV.DU's P/E ratio is -71.26. In terms of profitability, NA9.F's ROE is +0.26%, compared to MDV.DU's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NA9.F is more volatile compared to MDV.DU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA9.F.
NA9.F vs SFD1.DE Comparison
NA9.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA9.F stands at 935.21M. In comparison, SFD1.DE has a market cap of 1.54M. Regarding current trading prices, NA9.F is priced at $70.20, while SFD1.DE trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA9.F currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas SFD1.DE's P/E ratio is -45.00. In terms of profitability, NA9.F's ROE is +0.26%, compared to SFD1.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NA9.F is more volatile compared to SFD1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA9.F.
NA9.F vs EUCA.DE Comparison
NA9.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA9.F stands at 935.21M. In comparison, EUCA.DE has a market cap of 990634.00. Regarding current trading prices, NA9.F is priced at $70.20, while EUCA.DE trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA9.F currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas EUCA.DE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NA9.F's ROE is +0.26%, compared to EUCA.DE's ROE of +2.90%. Regarding short-term risk, NA9.F is less volatile compared to EUCA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA9.F.