Nagarro SE
Nagarro SE (NA9.F) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NA9.F) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Information Technology Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NA9.F | €44.34 | +2.02% | 570.4M | 11.47 | €3.77 | +2.23% |
| IBM.DE | €208.95 | +1.38% | 195.9B | 21.60 | €9.67 | +2.75% |
| FIV.DE | €48.12 | +2.44% | 25.4B | 8.63 | €5.50 | N/A |
| COZ.DE | €53.19 | +2.39% | 25.4B | 13.42 | €3.95 | +2.06% |
| 6WS.SG | €10.48 | +2.14% | 13.2B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| BC8.DE | €29.14 | +6.82% | 3.5B | 16.22 | €1.71 | +2.52% |
| 4018.F | €1,245.00 | -0.40% | 2B | -113.39 | -€10.98 | N/A |
| 217A.F | €6.95 | -4.79% | 1.8B | -58.33 | -€0.12 | N/A |
| COK.DE | €24.40 | +5.63% | 738.9M | 44.09 | €0.55 | +4.12% |
| CHG.DE | €31.20 | -1.89% | 727.2M | -32.63 | -€0.95 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
NA9.F vs IBM.DE Comparison April 2026
NA9.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA9.F stands at 570.4M. In comparison, IBM.DE has a market cap of 195.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NA9.F is priced at €44.34, while IBM.DE trades at €208.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA9.F currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas IBM.DE's P/E ratio is 21.60. In terms of profitability, NA9.F's ROE is +0.26%, compared to IBM.DE's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, NA9.F is less volatile compared to IBM.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA9.F.Check IBM.DE's competition here
NA9.F vs FIV.DE Comparison April 2026
NA9.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA9.F stands at 570.4M. In comparison, FIV.DE has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NA9.F is priced at €44.34, while FIV.DE trades at €48.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA9.F currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas FIV.DE's P/E ratio is 8.63. In terms of profitability, NA9.F's ROE is +0.26%, compared to FIV.DE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NA9.F is less volatile compared to FIV.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA9.F.Check FIV.DE's competition here
NA9.F vs COZ.DE Comparison April 2026
NA9.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA9.F stands at 570.4M. In comparison, COZ.DE has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NA9.F is priced at €44.34, while COZ.DE trades at €53.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA9.F currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas COZ.DE's P/E ratio is 13.42. In terms of profitability, NA9.F's ROE is +0.26%, compared to COZ.DE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NA9.F is less volatile compared to COZ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA9.F.Check COZ.DE's competition here
NA9.F vs 6WS.SG Comparison April 2026
NA9.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA9.F stands at 570.4M. In comparison, 6WS.SG has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NA9.F is priced at €44.34, while 6WS.SG trades at €10.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA9.F currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas 6WS.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NA9.F's ROE is +0.26%, compared to 6WS.SG's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NA9.F is less volatile compared to 6WS.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA9.F.Check 6WS.SG's competition here
NA9.F vs BC8.DE Comparison April 2026
NA9.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA9.F stands at 570.4M. In comparison, BC8.DE has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NA9.F is priced at €44.34, while BC8.DE trades at €29.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA9.F currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas BC8.DE's P/E ratio is 16.22. In terms of profitability, NA9.F's ROE is +0.26%, compared to BC8.DE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NA9.F is less volatile compared to BC8.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA9.F.Check BC8.DE's competition here
NA9.F vs 4018.F Comparison April 2026
NA9.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA9.F stands at 570.4M. In comparison, 4018.F has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, NA9.F is priced at €44.34, while 4018.F trades at €1,245.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA9.F currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas 4018.F's P/E ratio is -113.39. In terms of profitability, NA9.F's ROE is +0.26%, compared to 4018.F's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NA9.F is less volatile compared to 4018.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA9.F.Check 4018.F's competition here
NA9.F vs 217A.F Comparison April 2026
NA9.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA9.F stands at 570.4M. In comparison, 217A.F has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NA9.F is priced at €44.34, while 217A.F trades at €6.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA9.F currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas 217A.F's P/E ratio is -58.33. In terms of profitability, NA9.F's ROE is +0.26%, compared to 217A.F's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NA9.F is less volatile compared to 217A.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA9.F.Check 217A.F's competition here
NA9.F vs COK.DE Comparison April 2026
NA9.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA9.F stands at 570.4M. In comparison, COK.DE has a market cap of 738.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NA9.F is priced at €44.34, while COK.DE trades at €24.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA9.F currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas COK.DE's P/E ratio is 44.09. In terms of profitability, NA9.F's ROE is +0.26%, compared to COK.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NA9.F is less volatile compared to COK.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA9.F.Check COK.DE's competition here
NA9.F vs CHG.DE Comparison April 2026
NA9.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA9.F stands at 570.4M. In comparison, CHG.DE has a market cap of 727.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NA9.F is priced at €44.34, while CHG.DE trades at €31.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA9.F currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas CHG.DE's P/E ratio is -32.63. In terms of profitability, NA9.F's ROE is +0.26%, compared to CHG.DE's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NA9.F is less volatile compared to CHG.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA9.F.Check CHG.DE's competition here
NA9.F vs USY1.DE Comparison April 2026
NA9.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA9.F stands at 570.4M. In comparison, USY1.DE has a market cap of 700.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NA9.F is priced at €44.34, while USY1.DE trades at €10.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA9.F currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas USY1.DE's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, NA9.F's ROE is +0.26%, compared to USY1.DE's ROE of +5.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NA9.F and USY1.DE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check USY1.DE's competition here
NA9.F vs D6H.DE Comparison April 2026
NA9.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA9.F stands at 570.4M. In comparison, D6H.DE has a market cap of 615.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NA9.F is priced at €44.34, while D6H.DE trades at €74.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA9.F currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas D6H.DE's P/E ratio is 28.11. In terms of profitability, NA9.F's ROE is +0.26%, compared to D6H.DE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NA9.F and D6H.DE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check D6H.DE's competition here
NA9.F vs NA9.DE Comparison April 2026
NA9.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA9.F stands at 570.4M. In comparison, NA9.DE has a market cap of 590.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NA9.F is priced at €44.34, while NA9.DE trades at €48.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA9.F currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas NA9.DE's P/E ratio is 11.92. In terms of profitability, NA9.F's ROE is +0.26%, compared to NA9.DE's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NA9.F is less volatile compared to NA9.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA9.F.Check NA9.DE's competition here
NA9.F vs SHF.DE Comparison April 2026
NA9.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA9.F stands at 570.4M. In comparison, SHF.DE has a market cap of 589M. Regarding current trading prices, NA9.F is priced at €44.34, while SHF.DE trades at €80.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA9.F currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas SHF.DE's P/E ratio is 18.49. In terms of profitability, NA9.F's ROE is +0.26%, compared to SHF.DE's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NA9.F and SHF.DE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SHF.DE's competition here
NA9.F vs NB2.F Comparison April 2026
NA9.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA9.F stands at 570.4M. In comparison, NB2.F has a market cap of 565.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NA9.F is priced at €44.34, while NB2.F trades at €8.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA9.F currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas NB2.F's P/E ratio is -3.98. In terms of profitability, NA9.F's ROE is +0.26%, compared to NB2.F's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, NA9.F and NB2.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NB2.F's competition here
NA9.F vs NB2.DE Comparison April 2026
NA9.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA9.F stands at 570.4M. In comparison, NB2.DE has a market cap of 563.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NA9.F is priced at €44.34, while NB2.DE trades at €8.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA9.F currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas NB2.DE's P/E ratio is -3.97. In terms of profitability, NA9.F's ROE is +0.26%, compared to NB2.DE's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, NA9.F is less volatile compared to NB2.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA9.F.Check NB2.DE's competition here
NA9.F vs DE000A3H2200.SG Comparison April 2026
NA9.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA9.F stands at 570.4M. In comparison, DE000A3H2200.SG has a market cap of 556.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NA9.F is priced at €44.34, while DE000A3H2200.SG trades at €44.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA9.F currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas DE000A3H2200.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NA9.F's ROE is +0.26%, compared to DE000A3H2200.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NA9.F is less volatile compared to DE000A3H2200.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA9.F.Check DE000A3H2200.SG's competition here
NA9.F vs NA9.SG Comparison April 2026
NA9.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA9.F stands at 570.4M. In comparison, NA9.SG has a market cap of 529.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NA9.F is priced at €44.34, while NA9.SG trades at €48.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA9.F currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas NA9.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NA9.F's ROE is +0.26%, compared to NA9.SG's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NA9.F is less volatile compared to NA9.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA9.F.Check NA9.SG's competition here
NA9.F vs GFT.DE Comparison April 2026
NA9.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA9.F stands at 570.4M. In comparison, GFT.DE has a market cap of 438.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NA9.F is priced at €44.34, while GFT.DE trades at €17.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA9.F currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas GFT.DE's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, NA9.F's ROE is +0.26%, compared to GFT.DE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NA9.F is less volatile compared to GFT.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA9.F.Check GFT.DE's competition here
NA9.F vs IXX.DE Comparison April 2026
NA9.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA9.F stands at 570.4M. In comparison, IXX.DE has a market cap of 393.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NA9.F is priced at €44.34, while IXX.DE trades at €40.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA9.F currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas IXX.DE's P/E ratio is 26.94. In terms of profitability, NA9.F's ROE is +0.26%, compared to IXX.DE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NA9.F is less volatile compared to IXX.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA9.F.Check IXX.DE's competition here
NA9.F vs ADN1.DE Comparison April 2026
NA9.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA9.F stands at 570.4M. In comparison, ADN1.DE has a market cap of 366.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NA9.F is priced at €44.34, while ADN1.DE trades at €59.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA9.F currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas ADN1.DE's P/E ratio is 27.50. In terms of profitability, NA9.F's ROE is +0.26%, compared to ADN1.DE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NA9.F is less volatile compared to ADN1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA9.F.Check ADN1.DE's competition here
NA9.F vs MCE.DE Comparison April 2026
NA9.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA9.F stands at 570.4M. In comparison, MCE.DE has a market cap of 232.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NA9.F is priced at €44.34, while MCE.DE trades at €14.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA9.F currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas MCE.DE's P/E ratio is -39.17. In terms of profitability, NA9.F's ROE is +0.26%, compared to MCE.DE's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NA9.F is less volatile compared to MCE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA9.F.Check MCE.DE's competition here
NA9.F vs AEIN.DE Comparison April 2026
NA9.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA9.F stands at 570.4M. In comparison, AEIN.DE has a market cap of 188.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NA9.F is priced at €44.34, while AEIN.DE trades at €16.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA9.F currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas AEIN.DE's P/E ratio is 109.00. In terms of profitability, NA9.F's ROE is +0.26%, compared to AEIN.DE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NA9.F is less volatile compared to AEIN.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA9.F.Check AEIN.DE's competition here
NA9.F vs OSP2.DE Comparison April 2026
NA9.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA9.F stands at 570.4M. In comparison, OSP2.DE has a market cap of 185.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NA9.F is priced at €44.34, while OSP2.DE trades at €18.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA9.F currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas OSP2.DE's P/E ratio is 32.95. In terms of profitability, NA9.F's ROE is +0.26%, compared to OSP2.DE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NA9.F is less volatile compared to OSP2.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA9.F.Check OSP2.DE's competition here
NA9.F vs A1OS.DE Comparison April 2026
NA9.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA9.F stands at 570.4M. In comparison, A1OS.DE has a market cap of 151.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NA9.F is priced at €44.34, while A1OS.DE trades at €32.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA9.F currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas A1OS.DE's P/E ratio is 19.87. In terms of profitability, NA9.F's ROE is +0.26%, compared to A1OS.DE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NA9.F is less volatile compared to A1OS.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA9.F.Check A1OS.DE's competition here
NA9.F vs 30L3.DE Comparison April 2026
NA9.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA9.F stands at 570.4M. In comparison, 30L3.DE has a market cap of 134.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NA9.F is priced at €44.34, while 30L3.DE trades at €0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA9.F currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas 30L3.DE's P/E ratio is 6.29. In terms of profitability, NA9.F's ROE is +0.26%, compared to 30L3.DE's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NA9.F is less volatile compared to 30L3.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA9.F.Check 30L3.DE's competition here
NA9.F vs 3IT.F Comparison April 2026
NA9.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA9.F stands at 570.4M. In comparison, 3IT.F has a market cap of 65.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NA9.F is priced at €44.34, while 3IT.F trades at €13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA9.F currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas 3IT.F's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, NA9.F's ROE is +0.26%, compared to 3IT.F's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NA9.F and 3IT.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 3IT.F's competition here
NA9.F vs 3IT.DE Comparison April 2026
NA9.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA9.F stands at 570.4M. In comparison, 3IT.DE has a market cap of 64.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NA9.F is priced at €44.34, while 3IT.DE trades at €13.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA9.F currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas 3IT.DE's P/E ratio is 18.71. In terms of profitability, NA9.F's ROE is +0.26%, compared to 3IT.DE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NA9.F is less volatile compared to 3IT.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA9.F.Check 3IT.DE's competition here
NA9.F vs 3ITN.DE Comparison April 2026
NA9.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA9.F stands at 570.4M. In comparison, 3ITN.DE has a market cap of 58.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NA9.F is priced at €44.34, while 3ITN.DE trades at €11.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA9.F currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas 3ITN.DE's P/E ratio is 35.00. In terms of profitability, NA9.F's ROE is +0.26%, compared to 3ITN.DE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NA9.F is less volatile compared to 3ITN.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA9.F.Check 3ITN.DE's competition here
NA9.F vs IE2A.F Comparison April 2026
NA9.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA9.F stands at 570.4M. In comparison, IE2A.F has a market cap of 49.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NA9.F is priced at €44.34, while IE2A.F trades at €0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA9.F currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas IE2A.F's P/E ratio is 8.25. In terms of profitability, NA9.F's ROE is +0.26%, compared to IE2A.F's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NA9.F and IE2A.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IE2A.F's competition here
NA9.F vs OBS.DE Comparison April 2026
NA9.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA9.F stands at 570.4M. In comparison, OBS.DE has a market cap of 48.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NA9.F is priced at €44.34, while OBS.DE trades at €5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA9.F currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas OBS.DE's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, NA9.F's ROE is +0.26%, compared to OBS.DE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NA9.F is less volatile compared to OBS.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA9.F.Check OBS.DE's competition here
NA9.F vs SYT.DE Comparison April 2026
NA9.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA9.F stands at 570.4M. In comparison, SYT.DE has a market cap of 29.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NA9.F is priced at €44.34, while SYT.DE trades at €2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA9.F currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas SYT.DE's P/E ratio is -14.19. In terms of profitability, NA9.F's ROE is +0.26%, compared to SYT.DE's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NA9.F is less volatile compared to SYT.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA9.F.Check SYT.DE's competition here
NA9.F vs QBY.DE Comparison April 2026
NA9.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA9.F stands at 570.4M. In comparison, QBY.DE has a market cap of 19.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NA9.F is priced at €44.34, while QBY.DE trades at €0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA9.F currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas QBY.DE's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, NA9.F's ROE is +0.26%, compared to QBY.DE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NA9.F is less volatile compared to QBY.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA9.F.Check QBY.DE's competition here
NA9.F vs T3T1.DE Comparison April 2026
NA9.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA9.F stands at 570.4M. In comparison, T3T1.DE has a market cap of 19.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NA9.F is priced at €44.34, while T3T1.DE trades at €5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA9.F currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas T3T1.DE's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, NA9.F's ROE is +0.26%, compared to T3T1.DE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NA9.F and T3T1.DE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check T3T1.DE's competition here
NA9.F vs KSC.DE Comparison April 2026
NA9.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA9.F stands at 570.4M. In comparison, KSC.DE has a market cap of 14.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NA9.F is priced at €44.34, while KSC.DE trades at €0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA9.F currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas KSC.DE's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, NA9.F's ROE is +0.26%, compared to KSC.DE's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, NA9.F is less volatile compared to KSC.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA9.F.Check KSC.DE's competition here
NA9.F vs PDA.DE Comparison April 2026
NA9.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA9.F stands at 570.4M. In comparison, PDA.DE has a market cap of 11.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NA9.F is priced at €44.34, while PDA.DE trades at €2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA9.F currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas PDA.DE's P/E ratio is 30.50. In terms of profitability, NA9.F's ROE is +0.26%, compared to PDA.DE's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, NA9.F is less volatile compared to PDA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA9.F.Check PDA.DE's competition here
NA9.F vs SHWK.DE Comparison April 2026
NA9.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA9.F stands at 570.4M. In comparison, SHWK.DE has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NA9.F is priced at €44.34, while SHWK.DE trades at €3.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA9.F currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas SHWK.DE's P/E ratio is -3.34. In terms of profitability, NA9.F's ROE is +0.26%, compared to SHWK.DE's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, NA9.F is less volatile compared to SHWK.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA9.F.Check SHWK.DE's competition here
NA9.F vs AMI.DE Comparison April 2026
NA9.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA9.F stands at 570.4M. In comparison, AMI.DE has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NA9.F is priced at €44.34, while AMI.DE trades at €0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA9.F currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas AMI.DE's P/E ratio is -1.74. In terms of profitability, NA9.F's ROE is +0.26%, compared to AMI.DE's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NA9.F and AMI.DE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AMI.DE's competition here
NA9.F vs AMI.F Comparison April 2026
NA9.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA9.F stands at 570.4M. In comparison, AMI.F has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NA9.F is priced at €44.34, while AMI.F trades at €0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA9.F currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas AMI.F's P/E ratio is -1.43. In terms of profitability, NA9.F's ROE is +0.26%, compared to AMI.F's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NA9.F and AMI.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AMI.F's competition here
NA9.F vs RTC.DE Comparison April 2026
NA9.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA9.F stands at 570.4M. In comparison, RTC.DE has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NA9.F is priced at €44.34, while RTC.DE trades at €1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA9.F currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas RTC.DE's P/E ratio is 52.50. In terms of profitability, NA9.F's ROE is +0.26%, compared to RTC.DE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NA9.F and RTC.DE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RTC.DE's competition here
NA9.F vs PDA0.DE Comparison April 2026
NA9.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA9.F stands at 570.4M. In comparison, PDA0.DE has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NA9.F is priced at €44.34, while PDA0.DE trades at €2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA9.F currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas PDA0.DE's P/E ratio is -16.92. In terms of profitability, NA9.F's ROE is +0.26%, compared to PDA0.DE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NA9.F and PDA0.DE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PDA0.DE's competition here
NA9.F vs ASKN.DE Comparison April 2026
NA9.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA9.F stands at 570.4M. In comparison, ASKN.DE has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NA9.F is priced at €44.34, while ASKN.DE trades at €0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA9.F currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas ASKN.DE's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, NA9.F's ROE is +0.26%, compared to ASKN.DE's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NA9.F is less volatile compared to ASKN.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA9.F.Check ASKN.DE's competition here
NA9.F vs MDV.DU Comparison April 2026
NA9.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA9.F stands at 570.4M. In comparison, MDV.DU has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NA9.F is priced at €44.34, while MDV.DU trades at €6.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA9.F currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas MDV.DU's P/E ratio is -71.26. In terms of profitability, NA9.F's ROE is +0.26%, compared to MDV.DU's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NA9.F and MDV.DU have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MDV.DU's competition here
NA9.F vs SFD1.DE Comparison April 2026
NA9.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA9.F stands at 570.4M. In comparison, SFD1.DE has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NA9.F is priced at €44.34, while SFD1.DE trades at €0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA9.F currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas SFD1.DE's P/E ratio is -45.00. In terms of profitability, NA9.F's ROE is +0.26%, compared to SFD1.DE's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NA9.F and SFD1.DE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SFD1.DE's competition here
NA9.F vs EUCA.DE Comparison April 2026
NA9.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA9.F stands at 570.4M. In comparison, EUCA.DE has a market cap of 990.6K. Regarding current trading prices, NA9.F is priced at €44.34, while EUCA.DE trades at €0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA9.F currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas EUCA.DE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NA9.F's ROE is +0.26%, compared to EUCA.DE's ROE of +2.90%. Regarding short-term risk, NA9.F is less volatile compared to EUCA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA9.F.Check EUCA.DE's competition here
NA9.F vs WDL.DE Comparison April 2026
NA9.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA9.F stands at 570.4M. In comparison, WDL.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NA9.F is priced at €44.34, while WDL.DE trades at €1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA9.F currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas WDL.DE's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, NA9.F's ROE is +0.26%, compared to WDL.DE's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NA9.F is less volatile compared to WDL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA9.F.Check WDL.DE's competition here
NA9.F vs 2QU.DE Comparison April 2026
NA9.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA9.F stands at 570.4M. In comparison, 2QU.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NA9.F is priced at €44.34, while 2QU.DE trades at €17.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA9.F currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas 2QU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NA9.F's ROE is +0.26%, compared to 2QU.DE's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NA9.F and 2QU.DE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 2QU.DE's competition here