Maxim Power Corp.
Maxim Power Corp. (MXGFF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MXGFF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Independent Power Producers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MXGFF | $3.42 | +0.59% | 217.8M | 18.99 | $0.18 | +10.52% |
| CGNWF | $0.36 | +0.00% | 23.2B | 11.83 | $0.03 | +3.70% |
| UNPRF | $39.77 | -9.10% | 16.6B | -165.71 | -$0.24 | N/A |
| HGKGF | $6.65 | +1.14% | 14.2B | 17.97 | $0.37 | +5.51% |
| HGKGY | $6.42 | -4.10% | 14.2B | 17.50 | $0.38 | +5.11% |
| HUNGF | $0.64 | +2.03% | 13.8B | 9.12 | $0.07 | +5.84% |
| CRPJY | $37.07 | +0.00% | 12.8B | 6.53 | $5.68 | +5.73% |
| CRPJF | $2.33 | +0.00% | 12.1B | 6.13 | $0.38 | +6.32% |
| CPYYY | $8.79 | +1.62% | 10.4B | -34.92 | -$0.25 | +2.69% |
| CPYYF | $2.17 | +0.00% | 10.3B | -36.17 | -$0.06 | +2.74% |
Stock Comparison
MXGFF vs CGNWF Comparison August 2025
MXGFF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXGFF stands at 217.8M. In comparison, CGNWF has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MXGFF is priced at $3.42, while CGNWF trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.99, whereas CGNWF's P/E ratio is 11.83. In terms of profitability, MXGFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CGNWF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MXGFF is less volatile compared to CGNWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXGFF.Check CGNWF's competition here
MXGFF vs UNPRF Comparison August 2025
MXGFF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXGFF stands at 217.8M. In comparison, UNPRF has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MXGFF is priced at $3.42, while UNPRF trades at $39.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.99, whereas UNPRF's P/E ratio is -165.71. In terms of profitability, MXGFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UNPRF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MXGFF is less volatile compared to UNPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXGFF.Check UNPRF's competition here
MXGFF vs HGKGF Comparison August 2025
MXGFF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXGFF stands at 217.8M. In comparison, HGKGF has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MXGFF is priced at $3.42, while HGKGF trades at $6.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.99, whereas HGKGF's P/E ratio is 17.97. In terms of profitability, MXGFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HGKGF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MXGFF is less volatile compared to HGKGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXGFF.Check HGKGF's competition here
MXGFF vs HGKGY Comparison August 2025
MXGFF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXGFF stands at 217.8M. In comparison, HGKGY has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MXGFF is priced at $3.42, while HGKGY trades at $6.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.99, whereas HGKGY's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, MXGFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HGKGY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MXGFF is more volatile compared to HGKGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXGFF.Check HGKGY's competition here
MXGFF vs HUNGF Comparison August 2025
MXGFF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXGFF stands at 217.8M. In comparison, HUNGF has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MXGFF is priced at $3.42, while HUNGF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.99, whereas HUNGF's P/E ratio is 9.12. In terms of profitability, MXGFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HUNGF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MXGFF is more volatile compared to HUNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXGFF.Check HUNGF's competition here
MXGFF vs CRPJY Comparison August 2025
MXGFF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXGFF stands at 217.8M. In comparison, CRPJY has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MXGFF is priced at $3.42, while CRPJY trades at $37.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.99, whereas CRPJY's P/E ratio is 6.53. In terms of profitability, MXGFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CRPJY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MXGFF is less volatile compared to CRPJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXGFF.Check CRPJY's competition here
MXGFF vs CRPJF Comparison August 2025
MXGFF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXGFF stands at 217.8M. In comparison, CRPJF has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MXGFF is priced at $3.42, while CRPJF trades at $2.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.99, whereas CRPJF's P/E ratio is 6.13. In terms of profitability, MXGFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CRPJF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MXGFF is less volatile compared to CRPJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXGFF.Check CRPJF's competition here
MXGFF vs CPYYY Comparison August 2025
MXGFF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXGFF stands at 217.8M. In comparison, CPYYY has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MXGFF is priced at $3.42, while CPYYY trades at $8.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.99, whereas CPYYY's P/E ratio is -34.92. In terms of profitability, MXGFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CPYYY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MXGFF is more volatile compared to CPYYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXGFF.Check CPYYY's competition here
MXGFF vs CPYYF Comparison August 2025
MXGFF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXGFF stands at 217.8M. In comparison, CPYYF has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MXGFF is priced at $3.42, while CPYYF trades at $2.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.99, whereas CPYYF's P/E ratio is -36.17. In terms of profitability, MXGFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CPYYF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MXGFF is less volatile compared to CPYYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXGFF.Check CPYYF's competition here
MXGFF vs DIPGF Comparison August 2025
MXGFF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXGFF stands at 217.8M. In comparison, DIPGF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MXGFF is priced at $3.42, while DIPGF trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.99, whereas DIPGF's P/E ratio is 8.67. In terms of profitability, MXGFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DIPGF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MXGFF is less volatile compared to DIPGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXGFF.Check DIPGF's competition here
MXGFF vs CPWPF Comparison August 2025
MXGFF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXGFF stands at 217.8M. In comparison, CPWPF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MXGFF is priced at $3.42, while CPWPF trades at $17.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.99, whereas CPWPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MXGFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CPWPF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MXGFF is less volatile compared to CPWPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXGFF.Check CPWPF's competition here
MXGFF vs CPRHF Comparison August 2025
MXGFF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXGFF stands at 217.8M. In comparison, CPRHF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MXGFF is priced at $3.42, while CPRHF trades at $19.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.99, whereas CPRHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MXGFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CPRHF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MXGFF is more volatile compared to CPRHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXGFF.Check CPRHF's competition here
MXGFF vs EDRVY Comparison August 2025
MXGFF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXGFF stands at 217.8M. In comparison, EDRVY has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MXGFF is priced at $3.42, while EDRVY trades at $24.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.99, whereas EDRVY's P/E ratio is -19.77. In terms of profitability, MXGFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EDRVY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MXGFF is less volatile compared to EDRVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXGFF.Check EDRVY's competition here
MXGFF vs CPXWF Comparison August 2025
MXGFF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXGFF stands at 217.8M. In comparison, CPXWF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MXGFF is priced at $3.42, while CPXWF trades at $40.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.99, whereas CPXWF's P/E ratio is 12.39. In terms of profitability, MXGFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CPXWF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MXGFF is less volatile compared to CPXWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXGFF.Check CPXWF's competition here
MXGFF vs TLNE Comparison August 2025
MXGFF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXGFF stands at 217.8M. In comparison, TLNE has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MXGFF is priced at $3.42, while TLNE trades at $125.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.99, whereas TLNE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MXGFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TLNE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MXGFF is more volatile compared to TLNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXGFF.Check TLNE's competition here
MXGFF vs KYSEF Comparison August 2025
MXGFF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXGFF stands at 217.8M. In comparison, KYSEF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MXGFF is priced at $3.42, while KYSEF trades at $9.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.99, whereas KYSEF's P/E ratio is 8.60. In terms of profitability, MXGFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KYSEF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MXGFF is more volatile compared to KYSEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXGFF.Check KYSEF's competition here
MXGFF vs AGLXY Comparison August 2025
MXGFF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXGFF stands at 217.8M. In comparison, AGLXY has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MXGFF is priced at $3.42, while AGLXY trades at $6.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.99, whereas AGLXY's P/E ratio is 28.62. In terms of profitability, MXGFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AGLXY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MXGFF is more volatile compared to AGLXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXGFF.Check AGLXY's competition here
MXGFF vs CTPTY Comparison August 2025
MXGFF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXGFF stands at 217.8M. In comparison, CTPTY has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MXGFF is priced at $3.42, while CTPTY trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.99, whereas CTPTY's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, MXGFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CTPTY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MXGFF is more volatile compared to CTPTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXGFF.Check CTPTY's competition here
MXGFF vs AGLNF Comparison August 2025
MXGFF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXGFF stands at 217.8M. In comparison, AGLNF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MXGFF is priced at $3.42, while AGLNF trades at $6.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.99, whereas AGLNF's P/E ratio is 27.08. In terms of profitability, MXGFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AGLNF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MXGFF is more volatile compared to AGLNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXGFF.Check AGLNF's competition here
MXGFF vs CTPZY Comparison August 2025
MXGFF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXGFF stands at 217.8M. In comparison, CTPZY has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MXGFF is priced at $3.42, while CTPZY trades at $5.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.99, whereas CTPZY's P/E ratio is 7.23. In terms of profitability, MXGFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CTPZY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MXGFF is more volatile compared to CTPZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXGFF.Check CTPZY's competition here
MXGFF vs KYSEY Comparison August 2025
MXGFF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXGFF stands at 217.8M. In comparison, KYSEY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MXGFF is priced at $3.42, while KYSEY trades at $8.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.99, whereas KYSEY's P/E ratio is 4.74. In terms of profitability, MXGFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KYSEY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MXGFF is more volatile compared to KYSEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXGFF.Check KYSEY's competition here
MXGFF vs TSLTF Comparison August 2025
MXGFF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXGFF stands at 217.8M. In comparison, TSLTF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MXGFF is priced at $3.42, while TSLTF trades at $16.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.99, whereas TSLTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MXGFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TSLTF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MXGFF is less volatile compared to TSLTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXGFF.Check TSLTF's competition here
MXGFF vs EYUBY Comparison August 2025
MXGFF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXGFF stands at 217.8M. In comparison, EYUBY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MXGFF is priced at $3.42, while EYUBY trades at $22.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.99, whereas EYUBY's P/E ratio is 19.57. In terms of profitability, MXGFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EYUBY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MXGFF is less volatile compared to EYUBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXGFF.Check EYUBY's competition here
MXGFF vs TNSSF Comparison August 2025
MXGFF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXGFF stands at 217.8M. In comparison, TNSSF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MXGFF is priced at $3.42, while TNSSF trades at $9.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.99, whereas TNSSF's P/E ratio is -9.26. In terms of profitability, MXGFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TNSSF's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MXGFF is more volatile compared to TNSSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXGFF.Check TNSSF's competition here
MXGFF vs ACPIF Comparison August 2025
MXGFF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXGFF stands at 217.8M. In comparison, ACPIF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MXGFF is priced at $3.42, while ACPIF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.99, whereas ACPIF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, MXGFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ACPIF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MXGFF is less volatile compared to ACPIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXGFF.Check ACPIF's competition here
MXGFF vs EYGPF Comparison August 2025
MXGFF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXGFF stands at 217.8M. In comparison, EYGPF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MXGFF is priced at $3.42, while EYGPF trades at $2.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.99, whereas EYGPF's P/E ratio is 6.56. In terms of profitability, MXGFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EYGPF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MXGFF is more volatile compared to EYGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXGFF.Check EYGPF's competition here
MXGFF vs CGEGF Comparison August 2025
MXGFF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXGFF stands at 217.8M. In comparison, CGEGF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, MXGFF is priced at $3.42, while CGEGF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.99, whereas CGEGF's P/E ratio is 4.87. In terms of profitability, MXGFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CGEGF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MXGFF is more volatile compared to CGEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXGFF.Check CGEGF's competition here
MXGFF vs RJIFF Comparison August 2025
MXGFF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXGFF stands at 217.8M. In comparison, RJIFF has a market cap of 295M. Regarding current trading prices, MXGFF is priced at $3.42, while RJIFF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.99, whereas RJIFF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, MXGFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RJIFF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MXGFF is less volatile compared to RJIFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXGFF.Check RJIFF's competition here
MXGFF vs SRGRF Comparison August 2025
MXGFF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXGFF stands at 217.8M. In comparison, SRGRF has a market cap of 293.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MXGFF is priced at $3.42, while SRGRF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.99, whereas SRGRF's P/E ratio is 4.29. In terms of profitability, MXGFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SRGRF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MXGFF is more volatile compared to SRGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXGFF.Check SRGRF's competition here
MXGFF vs EWCLF Comparison August 2025
MXGFF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXGFF stands at 217.8M. In comparison, EWCLF has a market cap of 129.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MXGFF is priced at $3.42, while EWCLF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.99, whereas EWCLF's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, MXGFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EWCLF's ROE of -3.87%. Regarding short-term risk, MXGFF is more volatile compared to EWCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXGFF.Check EWCLF's competition here
MXGFF vs GDYMF Comparison August 2025
MXGFF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXGFF stands at 217.8M. In comparison, GDYMF has a market cap of 11.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MXGFF is priced at $3.42, while GDYMF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.99, whereas GDYMF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, MXGFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GDYMF's ROE of -1.68%. Regarding short-term risk, MXGFF is less volatile compared to GDYMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXGFF.Check GDYMF's competition here
MXGFF vs GEFI Comparison August 2025
MXGFF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXGFF stands at 217.8M. In comparison, GEFI has a market cap of 3.9K. Regarding current trading prices, MXGFF is priced at $3.42, while GEFI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.99, whereas GEFI's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, MXGFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GEFI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MXGFF is more volatile compared to GEFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXGFF.Check GEFI's competition here
MXGFF vs SOPV Comparison August 2025
MXGFF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXGFF stands at 217.8M. In comparison, SOPV has a market cap of 608. Regarding current trading prices, MXGFF is priced at $3.42, while SOPV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.99, whereas SOPV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MXGFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SOPV's ROE of +57.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MXGFF is less volatile compared to SOPV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXGFF.Check SOPV's competition here
MXGFF vs BLSP Comparison August 2025
MXGFF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXGFF stands at 217.8M. In comparison, BLSP has a market cap of 105. Regarding current trading prices, MXGFF is priced at $3.42, while BLSP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.99, whereas BLSP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MXGFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BLSP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MXGFF is less volatile compared to BLSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXGFF.Check BLSP's competition here
MXGFF vs NPIWF Comparison August 2025
MXGFF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXGFF stands at 217.8M. In comparison, NPIWF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MXGFF is priced at $3.42, while NPIWF trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.99, whereas NPIWF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MXGFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NPIWF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MXGFF is more volatile compared to NPIWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXGFF.Check NPIWF's competition here