Molson Coors Canada Inc.
Molson Coors Canada Inc. (MXGBF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MXGBF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Beverages - Alcoholic Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MXGBF | $48.42 | +0.00% | 9.9B | -4.50 | -$10.75 | +3.93% |
| BUDFF | $72.97 | +0.00% | 142B | 21.53 | $3.39 | +1.72% |
| HINKF | $82.65 | -0.24% | 45.8B | 20.81 | $3.93 | +2.67% |
| HEINY | $40.95 | +1.94% | 45.6B | 20.77 | $1.96 | +2.01% |
| FMXUF | $11.00 | +0.00% | 22.6B | 25.00 | $0.44 | +7.18% |
| HKHHY | $37.82 | +0.13% | 21.1B | 19.27 | $1.97 | +2.21% |
| HKHHF | $73.25 | -6.98% | 20.3B | 18.59 | $3.94 | +2.98% |
| CABHF | $149.10 | +0.00% | 19.7B | 19.19 | $7.77 | +2.65% |
| CABGY | $27.43 | +1.34% | 17.8B | 19.29 | $1.40 | +2.92% |
| CABJF | $132.70 | -4.88% | 17.5B | 19.01 | $6.98 | +2.98% |
Stock Comparison
MXGBF vs BUDFF Comparison March 2026
MXGBF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXGBF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, BUDFF has a market cap of 142B. Regarding current trading prices, MXGBF is priced at $48.42, while BUDFF trades at $72.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXGBF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas BUDFF's P/E ratio is 21.53. In terms of profitability, MXGBF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to BUDFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MXGBF is more volatile compared to BUDFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXGBF.Check BUDFF's competition here
MXGBF vs HINKF Comparison March 2026
MXGBF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXGBF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, HINKF has a market cap of 45.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MXGBF is priced at $48.42, while HINKF trades at $82.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXGBF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas HINKF's P/E ratio is 20.81. In terms of profitability, MXGBF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to HINKF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MXGBF is more volatile compared to HINKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXGBF.Check HINKF's competition here
MXGBF vs HEINY Comparison March 2026
MXGBF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXGBF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, HEINY has a market cap of 45.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MXGBF is priced at $48.42, while HEINY trades at $40.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXGBF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas HEINY's P/E ratio is 20.77. In terms of profitability, MXGBF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to HEINY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MXGBF is more volatile compared to HEINY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXGBF.Check HEINY's competition here
MXGBF vs FMXUF Comparison March 2026
MXGBF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXGBF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, FMXUF has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MXGBF is priced at $48.42, while FMXUF trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXGBF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas FMXUF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, MXGBF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to FMXUF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MXGBF is more volatile compared to FMXUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXGBF.Check FMXUF's competition here
MXGBF vs HKHHY Comparison March 2026
MXGBF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXGBF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, HKHHY has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MXGBF is priced at $48.42, while HKHHY trades at $37.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXGBF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas HKHHY's P/E ratio is 19.27. In terms of profitability, MXGBF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to HKHHY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MXGBF is more volatile compared to HKHHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXGBF.Check HKHHY's competition here
MXGBF vs HKHHF Comparison March 2026
MXGBF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXGBF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, HKHHF has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MXGBF is priced at $48.42, while HKHHF trades at $73.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXGBF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas HKHHF's P/E ratio is 18.59. In terms of profitability, MXGBF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to HKHHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MXGBF is less volatile compared to HKHHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXGBF.Check HKHHF's competition here
MXGBF vs CABHF Comparison March 2026
MXGBF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXGBF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, CABHF has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MXGBF is priced at $48.42, while CABHF trades at $149.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXGBF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas CABHF's P/E ratio is 19.19. In terms of profitability, MXGBF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to CABHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MXGBF is less volatile compared to CABHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXGBF.Check CABHF's competition here
MXGBF vs CABGY Comparison March 2026
MXGBF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXGBF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, CABGY has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MXGBF is priced at $48.42, while CABGY trades at $27.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXGBF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas CABGY's P/E ratio is 19.29. In terms of profitability, MXGBF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to CABGY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MXGBF is more volatile compared to CABGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXGBF.Check CABGY's competition here
MXGBF vs CABJF Comparison March 2026
MXGBF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXGBF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, CABJF has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MXGBF is priced at $48.42, while CABJF trades at $132.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXGBF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas CABJF's P/E ratio is 19.01. In terms of profitability, MXGBF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to CABJF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MXGBF is less volatile compared to CABJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXGBF.Check CABJF's competition here
MXGBF vs ASBRF Comparison March 2026
MXGBF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXGBF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, ASBRF has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, MXGBF is priced at $48.42, while ASBRF trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXGBF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas ASBRF's P/E ratio is 13.70. In terms of profitability, MXGBF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ASBRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MXGBF is more volatile compared to ASBRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXGBF.Check ASBRF's competition here
MXGBF vs KNBWY Comparison March 2026
MXGBF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXGBF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, KNBWY has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MXGBF is priced at $48.42, while KNBWY trades at $16.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXGBF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas KNBWY's P/E ratio is 14.22. In terms of profitability, MXGBF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to KNBWY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MXGBF is more volatile compared to KNBWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXGBF.Check KNBWY's competition here
MXGBF vs KNBWF Comparison March 2026
MXGBF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXGBF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, KNBWF has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MXGBF is priced at $48.42, while KNBWF trades at $15.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXGBF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas KNBWF's P/E ratio is 37.02. In terms of profitability, MXGBF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to KNBWF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MXGBF is more volatile compared to KNBWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXGBF.Check KNBWF's competition here
MXGBF vs BDWBY Comparison March 2026
MXGBF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXGBF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, BDWBY has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MXGBF is priced at $48.42, while BDWBY trades at $3.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXGBF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas BDWBY's P/E ratio is 25.83. In terms of profitability, MXGBF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to BDWBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MXGBF is more volatile compared to BDWBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXGBF.Check BDWBY's competition here
MXGBF vs BDWBF Comparison March 2026
MXGBF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXGBF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, BDWBF has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MXGBF is priced at $48.42, while BDWBF trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXGBF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas BDWBF's P/E ratio is 24.00. In terms of profitability, MXGBF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to BDWBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MXGBF is more volatile compared to BDWBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXGBF.Check BDWBF's competition here
MXGBF vs CRHKF Comparison March 2026
MXGBF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXGBF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, CRHKF has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MXGBF is priced at $48.42, while CRHKF trades at $3.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXGBF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas CRHKF's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, MXGBF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to CRHKF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MXGBF is more volatile compared to CRHKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXGBF.Check CRHKF's competition here
MXGBF vs CRHKY Comparison March 2026
MXGBF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXGBF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, CRHKY has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MXGBF is priced at $48.42, while CRHKY trades at $6.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXGBF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas CRHKY's P/E ratio is 12.48. In terms of profitability, MXGBF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to CRHKY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MXGBF is more volatile compared to CRHKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXGBF.Check CRHKY's competition here
MXGBF vs TSGTF Comparison March 2026
MXGBF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXGBF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, TSGTF has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MXGBF is priced at $48.42, while TSGTF trades at $5.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXGBF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas TSGTF's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, MXGBF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to TSGTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MXGBF is more volatile compared to TSGTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXGBF.Check TSGTF's competition here
MXGBF vs TSGTY Comparison March 2026
MXGBF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXGBF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, TSGTY has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MXGBF is priced at $48.42, while TSGTY trades at $30.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXGBF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas TSGTY's P/E ratio is 12.17. In terms of profitability, MXGBF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to TSGTY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MXGBF is more volatile compared to TSGTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXGBF.Check TSGTY's competition here
MXGBF vs STBFF Comparison March 2026
MXGBF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXGBF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, STBFF has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MXGBF is priced at $48.42, while STBFF trades at $29.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXGBF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas STBFF's P/E ratio is 16.53. In terms of profitability, MXGBF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to STBFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MXGBF is more volatile compared to STBFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXGBF.Check STBFF's competition here
MXGBF vs STBFY Comparison March 2026
MXGBF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXGBF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, STBFY has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MXGBF is priced at $48.42, while STBFY trades at $14.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXGBF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas STBFY's P/E ratio is 16.02. In terms of profitability, MXGBF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to STBFY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MXGBF is more volatile compared to STBFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXGBF.Check STBFY's competition here
MXGBF vs SOOBF Comparison March 2026
MXGBF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXGBF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, SOOBF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MXGBF is priced at $48.42, while SOOBF trades at $9.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXGBF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas SOOBF's P/E ratio is 162.10. In terms of profitability, MXGBF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to SOOBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MXGBF is less volatile compared to SOOBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXGBF.Check SOOBF's competition here
MXGBF vs ROYUF Comparison March 2026
MXGBF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXGBF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, ROYUF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MXGBF is priced at $48.42, while ROYUF trades at $73.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXGBF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas ROYUF's P/E ratio is 15.29. In terms of profitability, MXGBF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ROYUF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MXGBF is less volatile compared to ROYUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXGBF.Check ROYUF's competition here
MXGBF vs AEBZY Comparison March 2026
MXGBF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXGBF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, AEBZY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MXGBF is priced at $48.42, while AEBZY trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXGBF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas AEBZY's P/E ratio is 14.33. In terms of profitability, MXGBF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to AEBZY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MXGBF is more volatile compared to AEBZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXGBF.Check AEBZY's competition here
MXGBF vs UMLGF Comparison March 2026
MXGBF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXGBF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, UMLGF has a market cap of 809.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MXGBF is priced at $48.42, while UMLGF trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXGBF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas UMLGF's P/E ratio is 90.00. In terms of profitability, MXGBF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to UMLGF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MXGBF is less volatile compared to UMLGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXGBF.Check UMLGF's competition here
MXGBF vs CCGPY Comparison March 2026
MXGBF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXGBF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, CCGPY has a market cap of 666.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MXGBF is priced at $48.42, while CCGPY trades at $5.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXGBF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas CCGPY's P/E ratio is 28.16. In terms of profitability, MXGBF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to CCGPY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MXGBF is more volatile compared to CCGPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXGBF.Check CCGPY's competition here
MXGBF vs CGPZF Comparison March 2026
MXGBF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXGBF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, CGPZF has a market cap of 593M. Regarding current trading prices, MXGBF is priced at $48.42, while CGPZF trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXGBF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas CGPZF's P/E ratio is 26.83. In terms of profitability, MXGBF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to CGPZF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MXGBF is more volatile compared to CGPZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXGBF.Check CGPZF's competition here
MXGBF vs BIBLF Comparison March 2026
MXGBF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXGBF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, BIBLF has a market cap of 104.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MXGBF is priced at $48.42, while BIBLF trades at $2.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXGBF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas BIBLF's P/E ratio is 146.00. In terms of profitability, MXGBF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to BIBLF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MXGBF is more volatile compared to BIBLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXGBF.Check BIBLF's competition here
MXGBF vs SMGLF Comparison March 2026
MXGBF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXGBF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, SMGLF has a market cap of 63.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MXGBF is priced at $48.42, while SMGLF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXGBF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas SMGLF's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, MXGBF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to SMGLF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MXGBF is more volatile compared to SMGLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXGBF.Check SMGLF's competition here
MXGBF vs BRBMF Comparison March 2026
MXGBF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXGBF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, BRBMF has a market cap of 15.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MXGBF is priced at $48.42, while BRBMF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXGBF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas BRBMF's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, MXGBF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to BRBMF's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MXGBF is more volatile compared to BRBMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXGBF.Check BRBMF's competition here
MXGBF vs EARI Comparison March 2026
MXGBF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXGBF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, EARI has a market cap of 943.1K. Regarding current trading prices, MXGBF is priced at $48.42, while EARI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXGBF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas EARI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MXGBF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to EARI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MXGBF is less volatile compared to EARI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXGBF.Check EARI's competition here
MXGBF vs HVCW Comparison March 2026
MXGBF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXGBF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, HVCW has a market cap of 770.5K. Regarding current trading prices, MXGBF is priced at $48.42, while HVCW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXGBF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas HVCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MXGBF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to HVCW's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, MXGBF is more volatile compared to HVCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXGBF.Check HVCW's competition here
MXGBF vs SIPC Comparison March 2026
MXGBF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXGBF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, SIPC has a market cap of 430.4K. Regarding current trading prices, MXGBF is priced at $48.42, while SIPC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXGBF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas SIPC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MXGBF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to SIPC's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MXGBF is less volatile compared to SIPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXGBF.Check SIPC's competition here
MXGBF vs MRIB Comparison March 2026
MXGBF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXGBF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, MRIB has a market cap of 3.6K. Regarding current trading prices, MXGBF is priced at $48.42, while MRIB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXGBF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas MRIB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MXGBF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to MRIB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MXGBF is less volatile compared to MRIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXGBF.Check MRIB's competition here
MXGBF vs MENB Comparison March 2026
MXGBF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXGBF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, MENB has a market cap of 1.3K. Regarding current trading prices, MXGBF is priced at $48.42, while MENB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXGBF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas MENB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MXGBF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to MENB's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, MXGBF is more volatile compared to MENB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXGBF.Check MENB's competition here
MXGBF vs GBEN Comparison March 2026
MXGBF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXGBF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, GBEN has a market cap of 7. Regarding current trading prices, MXGBF is priced at $48.42, while GBEN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXGBF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas GBEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MXGBF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to GBEN's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, MXGBF is less volatile compared to GBEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXGBF.Check GBEN's competition here