Methanex Corporation (TSX: MX.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Methanex Corporation (TSX: MX.TO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX.TO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, CHE-UN.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MX.TO is priced at CA$79.05 on the TSX, while CHE-UN.TO trades at CA$15.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 57.22, whereas CHE-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 14.31. In terms of profitability, MX.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CHE-UN.TO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MX.TO is more volatile compared to CHE-UN.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.TO.Check CHE-UN.TO's competition here

Methanex Corporation (TSX: MX.TO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX.TO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, GRA.TO has a market cap of 297.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MX.TO is priced at CA$79.05 on the TSX, while GRA.TO trades at CA$1.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 57.22, whereas GRA.TO's P/E ratio is -27.33. In terms of profitability, MX.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GRA.TO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MX.TO is less volatile compared to GRA.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.TO.Check GRA.TO's competition here

Methanex Corporation (TSX: MX.TO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX.TO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, FAT.CN has a market cap of 26.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MX.TO is priced at CA$79.05 on the TSX, while FAT.CN trades at CA$1.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 57.22, whereas FAT.CN's P/E ratio is -2.75. In terms of profitability, MX.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FAT.CN's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MX.TO is less volatile compared to FAT.CN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.TO.Check FAT.CN's competition here

Methanex Corporation (TSX: MX.TO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX.TO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, OPC.CN has a market cap of 605.6K. Regarding current trading prices, MX.TO is priced at CA$79.05 on the TSX, while OPC.CN trades at CA$0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 57.22, whereas OPC.CN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MX.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OPC.CN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MX.TO is more volatile compared to OPC.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.TO.Check OPC.CN's competition here