Methanex Corporation

MX.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX.TO stands at 6.6B. In comparison, CHE-UN.TO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MX.TO is priced at CA$85.15, while CHE-UN.TO trades at CA$16.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 65.50, whereas CHE-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 13.68. In terms of profitability, MX.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CHE-UN.TO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MX.TO is more volatile compared to CHE-UN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.TO.Check CHE-UN.TO's competition here

MX.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX.TO stands at 6.6B. In comparison, GRA.TO has a market cap of 408.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MX.TO is priced at CA$85.15, while GRA.TO trades at CA$2.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 65.50, whereas GRA.TO's P/E ratio is -32.14. In terms of profitability, MX.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GRA.TO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MX.TO is more volatile compared to GRA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.TO.Check GRA.TO's competition here

MX.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX.TO stands at 6.6B. In comparison, FAT.CN has a market cap of 33.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MX.TO is priced at CA$85.15, while FAT.CN trades at CA$2.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 65.50, whereas FAT.CN's P/E ratio is -16.43. In terms of profitability, MX.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FAT.CN's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MX.TO is more volatile compared to FAT.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.TO.Check FAT.CN's competition here

MX.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX.TO stands at 6.6B. In comparison, ARGO.CN has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MX.TO is priced at CA$85.15, while ARGO.CN trades at CA$0.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 65.50, whereas ARGO.CN's P/E ratio is -3.42. In terms of profitability, MX.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ARGO.CN's ROE of -9.71%. Regarding short-term risk, MX.TO is more volatile compared to ARGO.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.TO.Check ARGO.CN's competition here

MX.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX.TO stands at 6.6B. In comparison, OPC.CN has a market cap of 605.6K. Regarding current trading prices, MX.TO is priced at CA$85.15, while OPC.CN trades at CA$0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 65.50, whereas OPC.CN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MX.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to OPC.CN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MX.TO is more volatile compared to OPC.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.TO.Check OPC.CN's competition here