Methanex Corporation

MX.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, CHE-UN.TO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MX.TO is priced at CA$45.70, while CHE-UN.TO trades at CA$11.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.54, whereas CHE-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 10.28. In terms of profitability, MX.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CHE-UN.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MX.TO is more volatile compared to CHE-UN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.TO.Check CHE-UN.TO's competition here

MX.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, GRA.TO has a market cap of 511.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MX.TO is priced at CA$45.70, while GRA.TO trades at CA$3.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.54, whereas GRA.TO's P/E ratio is -50.00. In terms of profitability, MX.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GRA.TO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MX.TO is more volatile compared to GRA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.TO.Check GRA.TO's competition here

MX.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, FAT.CN has a market cap of 40.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MX.TO is priced at CA$45.70, while FAT.CN trades at CA$3.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.54, whereas FAT.CN's P/E ratio is -7.12. In terms of profitability, MX.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FAT.CN's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MX.TO is less volatile compared to FAT.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.TO.Check FAT.CN's competition here

MX.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ARGO.CN has a market cap of 15.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MX.TO is priced at CA$45.70, while ARGO.CN trades at CA$0.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.54, whereas ARGO.CN's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, MX.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ARGO.CN's ROE of -4.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MX.TO is less volatile compared to ARGO.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.TO.Check ARGO.CN's competition here

MX.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, OPC.CN has a market cap of 605.6K. Regarding current trading prices, MX.TO is priced at CA$45.70, while OPC.CN trades at CA$0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.54, whereas OPC.CN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MX.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OPC.CN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MX.TO is more volatile compared to OPC.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.TO.Check OPC.CN's competition here