Microsoft Corporation (TSX: MSFT.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See MSFT.TO's competitors and their performance on the TSX and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Infrastructure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for MSFT.TO and its TSX peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSFT.TO | CA$36.93 | -1.02% | 274.2B | 1.48 | CA$24.89 | N/A |
| MSFT.NE | CA$36.95 | -0.86% | 5.4T | 2.39 | CA$15.45 | +0.69% |
| PANW.TO | CA$36.71 | -0.08% | 670.8B | 1095.82 | CA$0.03 | N/A |
| PLTR.NE | CA$12.07 | +3.25% | 523B | 7.20 | CA$1.68 | N/A |
| PANW.NE | CA$36.58 | -0.11% | 292.9B | 50.29 | CA$0.73 | N/A |
| CRWD.TO | CA$13.42 | -0.15% | 62.6B | 258.57 | CA$0.05 | N/A |
| PLTR.TO | CA$12.06 | +3.61% | 27.7B | 7.19 | CA$1.68 | N/A |
| ORAC.TO | CA$5.70 | +0.88% | 17.2B | 0.70 | CA$8.19 | N/A |
| BB.TO | CA$12.33 | +4.85% | 7.2B | 46.44 | CA$0.27 | N/A |
| NVEI.TO | CA$47.61 | N/A | 6.8B | 216.41 | CA$0.22 | +1.15% |
Stock Comparison
Microsoft Corporation (NEO: MSFT.NE)
MSFT.TO vs MSFT.NE Comparison November 2026
Microsoft Corporation (TSX: MSFT.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT.TO stands at 274.2B. In comparison, MSFT.NE has a market cap of 5.4T. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT.TO is priced at CA$36.93 on the TSX, while MSFT.NE trades at CA$36.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas MSFT.NE's P/E ratio is 2.39. In terms of profitability, MSFT.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to MSFT.NE's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT.TO is more volatile compared to MSFT.NE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.TO.Check MSFT.NE's competition here
Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (TSX: PANW.TO)
MSFT.TO vs PANW.TO Comparison November 2026
Microsoft Corporation (TSX: MSFT.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT.TO stands at 274.2B. In comparison, PANW.TO has a market cap of 670.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT.TO is priced at CA$36.93 on the TSX, while PANW.TO trades at CA$36.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas PANW.TO's P/E ratio is 1095.82. In terms of profitability, MSFT.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to PANW.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT.TO is less volatile compared to PANW.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.TO.Check PANW.TO's competition here
Palantir Technologies Inc. (NEO: PLTR.NE)
MSFT.TO vs PLTR.NE Comparison November 2026
Microsoft Corporation (TSX: MSFT.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT.TO stands at 274.2B. In comparison, PLTR.NE has a market cap of 523B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT.TO is priced at CA$36.93 on the TSX, while PLTR.NE trades at CA$12.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas PLTR.NE's P/E ratio is 7.20. In terms of profitability, MSFT.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to PLTR.NE's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT.TO is less volatile compared to PLTR.NE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.TO.Check PLTR.NE's competition here
Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NEO: PANW.NE)
MSFT.TO vs PANW.NE Comparison November 2026
Microsoft Corporation (TSX: MSFT.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT.TO stands at 274.2B. In comparison, PANW.NE has a market cap of 292.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT.TO is priced at CA$36.93 on the TSX, while PANW.NE trades at CA$36.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas PANW.NE's P/E ratio is 50.29. In terms of profitability, MSFT.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to PANW.NE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT.TO is less volatile compared to PANW.NE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.TO.Check PANW.NE's competition here
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (TSX: CRWD.TO)
MSFT.TO vs CRWD.TO Comparison November 2026
Microsoft Corporation (TSX: MSFT.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT.TO stands at 274.2B. In comparison, CRWD.TO has a market cap of 62.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT.TO is priced at CA$36.93 on the TSX, while CRWD.TO trades at CA$13.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas CRWD.TO's P/E ratio is 258.57. In terms of profitability, MSFT.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to CRWD.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT.TO is less volatile compared to CRWD.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.TO.Check CRWD.TO's competition here
Palantir Technologies Inc. (TSX: PLTR.TO)
MSFT.TO vs PLTR.TO Comparison November 2026
Microsoft Corporation (TSX: MSFT.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT.TO stands at 274.2B. In comparison, PLTR.TO has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT.TO is priced at CA$36.93 on the TSX, while PLTR.TO trades at CA$12.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas PLTR.TO's P/E ratio is 7.19. In terms of profitability, MSFT.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to PLTR.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT.TO is less volatile compared to PLTR.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.TO.Check PLTR.TO's competition here
Oracle Corporation (TSX: ORAC.TO)
MSFT.TO vs ORAC.TO Comparison November 2026
Microsoft Corporation (TSX: MSFT.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT.TO stands at 274.2B. In comparison, ORAC.TO has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT.TO is priced at CA$36.93 on the TSX, while ORAC.TO trades at CA$5.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas ORAC.TO's P/E ratio is 0.70. In terms of profitability, MSFT.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to ORAC.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT.TO is less volatile compared to ORAC.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.TO.Check ORAC.TO's competition here
BlackBerry Limited (TSX: BB.TO)
MSFT.TO vs BB.TO Comparison November 2026
Microsoft Corporation (TSX: MSFT.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT.TO stands at 274.2B. In comparison, BB.TO has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT.TO is priced at CA$36.93 on the TSX, while BB.TO trades at CA$12.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas BB.TO's P/E ratio is 46.44. In terms of profitability, MSFT.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to BB.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT.TO is less volatile compared to BB.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.TO.Check BB.TO's competition here
Nuvei Corporation (TSX: NVEI.TO)
MSFT.TO vs NVEI.TO Comparison November 2026
Microsoft Corporation (TSX: MSFT.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT.TO stands at 274.2B. In comparison, NVEI.TO has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT.TO is priced at CA$36.93 on the TSX, while NVEI.TO trades at CA$47.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas NVEI.TO's P/E ratio is 216.41. In terms of profitability, MSFT.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to NVEI.TO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT.TO is more volatile compared to NVEI.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.TO.Check NVEI.TO's competition here
CoreWeave, Inc. (TSX: CRWV.TO)
MSFT.TO vs CRWV.TO Comparison November 2026
Microsoft Corporation (TSX: MSFT.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT.TO stands at 274.2B. In comparison, CRWV.TO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT.TO is priced at CA$36.93 on the TSX, while CRWV.TO trades at CA$8.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas CRWV.TO's P/E ratio is -1.68. In terms of profitability, MSFT.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to CRWV.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT.TO is less volatile compared to CRWV.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.TO.Check CRWV.TO's competition here
TELUS International (Cda) Inc. (TSX: TIXT.TO)
MSFT.TO vs TIXT.TO Comparison November 2026
Microsoft Corporation (TSX: MSFT.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT.TO stands at 274.2B. In comparison, TIXT.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT.TO is priced at CA$36.93 on the TSX, while TIXT.TO trades at CA$6.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas TIXT.TO's P/E ratio is -3.11. In terms of profitability, MSFT.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to TIXT.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT.TO is less volatile compared to TIXT.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.TO.Check TIXT.TO's competition here
Copperleaf Technologies Inc. (TSX: CPLF.TO)
MSFT.TO vs CPLF.TO Comparison November 2026
Microsoft Corporation (TSX: MSFT.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT.TO stands at 274.2B. In comparison, CPLF.TO has a market cap of 943.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT.TO is priced at CA$36.93 on the TSX, while CPLF.TO trades at CA$11.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas CPLF.TO's P/E ratio is -49.96. In terms of profitability, MSFT.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to CPLF.TO's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT.TO is more volatile compared to CPLF.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.TO.Check CPLF.TO's competition here
Coveo Solutions Inc. (TSX: CVO.TO)
MSFT.TO vs CVO.TO Comparison November 2026
Microsoft Corporation (TSX: MSFT.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT.TO stands at 274.2B. In comparison, CVO.TO has a market cap of 415.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT.TO is priced at CA$36.93 on the TSX, while CVO.TO trades at CA$4.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas CVO.TO's P/E ratio is -12.66. In terms of profitability, MSFT.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to CVO.TO's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT.TO is less volatile compared to CVO.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.TO.Check CVO.TO's competition here
BTQ Technologies Corp. (NEO: BTQ.NE)
MSFT.TO vs BTQ.NE Comparison November 2026
Microsoft Corporation (TSX: MSFT.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT.TO stands at 274.2B. In comparison, BTQ.NE has a market cap of 386.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT.TO is priced at CA$36.93 on the TSX, while BTQ.NE trades at CA$2.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas BTQ.NE's P/E ratio is -6.42. In terms of profitability, MSFT.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to BTQ.NE's ROE of -2.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT.TO is less volatile compared to BTQ.NE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.TO.Check BTQ.NE's competition here
Sangoma Technologies Corporation (TSX: STC.TO)
MSFT.TO vs STC.TO Comparison November 2026
Microsoft Corporation (TSX: MSFT.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT.TO stands at 274.2B. In comparison, STC.TO has a market cap of 216.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT.TO is priced at CA$36.93 on the TSX, while STC.TO trades at CA$6.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas STC.TO's P/E ratio is -1.91. In terms of profitability, MSFT.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to STC.TO's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT.TO is less volatile compared to STC.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.TO.Check STC.TO's competition here
Tucows Inc. (TSX: TC.TO)
MSFT.TO vs TC.TO Comparison November 2026
Microsoft Corporation (TSX: MSFT.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT.TO stands at 274.2B. In comparison, TC.TO has a market cap of 200.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT.TO is priced at CA$36.93 on the TSX, while TC.TO trades at CA$17.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas TC.TO's P/E ratio is -1.76. In terms of profitability, MSFT.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to TC.TO's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT.TO is less volatile compared to TC.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.TO.Check TC.TO's competition here
Payfare Inc. (TSX: PAY.TO)
MSFT.TO vs PAY.TO Comparison November 2026
Microsoft Corporation (TSX: MSFT.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT.TO stands at 274.2B. In comparison, PAY.TO has a market cap of 193.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT.TO is priced at CA$36.93 on the TSX, while PAY.TO trades at CA$4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas PAY.TO's P/E ratio is 10.26. In terms of profitability, MSFT.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to PAY.TO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT.TO is more volatile compared to PAY.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.TO.Check PAY.TO's competition here
Givex Corp. (TSX: GIVX.TO)
MSFT.TO vs GIVX.TO Comparison November 2026
Microsoft Corporation (TSX: MSFT.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT.TO stands at 274.2B. In comparison, GIVX.TO has a market cap of 190.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT.TO is priced at CA$36.93 on the TSX, while GIVX.TO trades at CA$1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas GIVX.TO's P/E ratio is -74.50. In terms of profitability, MSFT.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to GIVX.TO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT.TO is more volatile compared to GIVX.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.TO.Check GIVX.TO's competition here
Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited (TSX: XNDU.TO)
MSFT.TO vs XNDU.TO Comparison November 2026
Microsoft Corporation (TSX: MSFT.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT.TO stands at 274.2B. In comparison, XNDU.TO has a market cap of 162.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT.TO is priced at CA$36.93 on the TSX, while XNDU.TO trades at CA$3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas XNDU.TO's P/E ratio is -3.52. In terms of profitability, MSFT.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to XNDU.TO's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT.TO is less volatile compared to XNDU.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.TO.Check XNDU.TO's competition here
Haivision Systems Inc. (TSX: HAI.TO)
MSFT.TO vs HAI.TO Comparison November 2026
Microsoft Corporation (TSX: MSFT.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT.TO stands at 274.2B. In comparison, HAI.TO has a market cap of 99.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT.TO is priced at CA$36.93 on the TSX, while HAI.TO trades at CA$3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas HAI.TO's P/E ratio is 103.14. In terms of profitability, MSFT.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to HAI.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT.TO is less volatile compared to HAI.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.TO.Check HAI.TO's competition here
Railtown AI Technologies Inc. (CNQ: RAIL.CN)
MSFT.TO vs RAIL.CN Comparison November 2026
Microsoft Corporation (TSX: MSFT.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT.TO stands at 274.2B. In comparison, RAIL.CN has a market cap of 58.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT.TO is priced at CA$36.93 on the TSX, while RAIL.CN trades at CA$0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas RAIL.CN's P/E ratio is -3.99. In terms of profitability, MSFT.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to RAIL.CN's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT.TO is more volatile compared to RAIL.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.TO.Check RAIL.CN's competition here
NetCents Technology Inc. (CNQ: NC.CN)
MSFT.TO vs NC.CN Comparison November 2026
Microsoft Corporation (TSX: MSFT.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT.TO stands at 274.2B. In comparison, NC.CN has a market cap of 55.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT.TO is priced at CA$36.93 on the TSX, while NC.CN trades at CA$0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas NC.CN's P/E ratio is -2.62. In terms of profitability, MSFT.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to NC.CN's ROE of +41.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT.TO is more volatile compared to NC.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.TO.Check NC.CN's competition here
Tenet Fintech Group Inc. (CNQ: PKK.CN)
MSFT.TO vs PKK.CN Comparison November 2026
Microsoft Corporation (TSX: MSFT.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT.TO stands at 274.2B. In comparison, PKK.CN has a market cap of 52.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT.TO is priced at CA$36.93 on the TSX, while PKK.CN trades at CA$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas PKK.CN's P/E ratio is -24.03. In terms of profitability, MSFT.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to PKK.CN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT.TO is less volatile compared to PKK.CN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.TO.Check PKK.CN's competition here
Cybeats Technologies Corp. (CNQ: CYBT.CN)
MSFT.TO vs CYBT.CN Comparison November 2026
Microsoft Corporation (TSX: MSFT.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT.TO stands at 274.2B. In comparison, CYBT.CN has a market cap of 40M. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT.TO is priced at CA$36.93 on the TSX, while CYBT.CN trades at CA$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas CYBT.CN's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, MSFT.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to CYBT.CN's ROE of +1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT.TO is less volatile compared to CYBT.CN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.TO.Check CYBT.CN's competition here
Scryb Inc. (CNQ: SCYB.CN)
MSFT.TO vs SCYB.CN Comparison November 2026
Microsoft Corporation (TSX: MSFT.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT.TO stands at 274.2B. In comparison, SCYB.CN has a market cap of 36.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT.TO is priced at CA$36.93 on the TSX, while SCYB.CN trades at CA$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas SCYB.CN's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, MSFT.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to SCYB.CN's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT.TO is more volatile compared to SCYB.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.TO.Check SCYB.CN's competition here
Orion Digital Corp. (TSX: ORIO.TO)
MSFT.TO vs ORIO.TO Comparison November 2026
Microsoft Corporation (TSX: MSFT.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT.TO stands at 274.2B. In comparison, ORIO.TO has a market cap of 36.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT.TO is priced at CA$36.93 on the TSX, while ORIO.TO trades at CA$1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas ORIO.TO's P/E ratio is -4.70. In terms of profitability, MSFT.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to ORIO.TO's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT.TO is less volatile compared to ORIO.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.TO.Check ORIO.TO's competition here
Mogo Inc. (TSX: MOGO.TO)
MSFT.TO vs MOGO.TO Comparison November 2026
Microsoft Corporation (TSX: MSFT.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT.TO stands at 274.2B. In comparison, MOGO.TO has a market cap of 35.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT.TO is priced at CA$36.93 on the TSX, while MOGO.TO trades at CA$1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas MOGO.TO's P/E ratio is 4.81. In terms of profitability, MSFT.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to MOGO.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT.TO is less volatile compared to MOGO.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.TO.Check MOGO.TO's competition here
Integrated Cyber Solutions Inc (CNQ: ICS.CN)
MSFT.TO vs ICS.CN Comparison November 2026
Microsoft Corporation (TSX: MSFT.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT.TO stands at 274.2B. In comparison, ICS.CN has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT.TO is priced at CA$36.93 on the TSX, while ICS.CN trades at CA$0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas ICS.CN's P/E ratio is -7.86. In terms of profitability, MSFT.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to ICS.CN's ROE of +2.98%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT.TO is less volatile compared to ICS.CN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.TO.Check ICS.CN's competition here
Scope Technologies Corp. (CNQ: SCPE.CN)
MSFT.TO vs SCPE.CN Comparison November 2026
Microsoft Corporation (TSX: MSFT.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT.TO stands at 274.2B. In comparison, SCPE.CN has a market cap of 27.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT.TO is priced at CA$36.93 on the TSX, while SCPE.CN trades at CA$0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas SCPE.CN's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, MSFT.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to SCPE.CN's ROE of -20.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT.TO is less volatile compared to SCPE.CN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.TO.Check SCPE.CN's competition here
EonX Technologies Inc. (CNQ: EONX.CN)
MSFT.TO vs EONX.CN Comparison November 2026
Microsoft Corporation (TSX: MSFT.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT.TO stands at 274.2B. In comparison, EONX.CN has a market cap of 24.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT.TO is priced at CA$36.93 on the TSX, while EONX.CN trades at CA$0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas EONX.CN's P/E ratio is -3.58. In terms of profitability, MSFT.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to EONX.CN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT.TO is more volatile compared to EONX.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.TO.Check EONX.CN's competition here
Impact Analytics Inc. (CNQ: PACT.CN)
MSFT.TO vs PACT.CN Comparison November 2026
Microsoft Corporation (TSX: MSFT.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT.TO stands at 274.2B. In comparison, PACT.CN has a market cap of 18M. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT.TO is priced at CA$36.93 on the TSX, while PACT.CN trades at CA$0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas PACT.CN's P/E ratio is -5.56. In terms of profitability, MSFT.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to PACT.CN's ROE of -46.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT.TO is more volatile compared to PACT.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.TO.Check PACT.CN's competition here
Looking Glass Labs Ltd. (NEO: NFTX.NE)
MSFT.TO vs NFTX.NE Comparison November 2026
Microsoft Corporation (TSX: MSFT.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT.TO stands at 274.2B. In comparison, NFTX.NE has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT.TO is priced at CA$36.93 on the TSX, while NFTX.NE trades at CA$0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas NFTX.NE's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, MSFT.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to NFTX.NE's ROE of +40.75%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT.TO is less volatile compared to NFTX.NE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.TO.Check NFTX.NE's competition here
VPN Technologies Inc. (CNQ: VPN.CN)
MSFT.TO vs VPN.CN Comparison November 2026
Microsoft Corporation (TSX: MSFT.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT.TO stands at 274.2B. In comparison, VPN.CN has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT.TO is priced at CA$36.93 on the TSX, while VPN.CN trades at CA$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas VPN.CN's P/E ratio is -18.50. In terms of profitability, MSFT.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to VPN.CN's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT.TO is less volatile compared to VPN.CN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.TO.Check VPN.CN's competition here
Perk Labs Inc. (CNQ: PERK.CN)
MSFT.TO vs PERK.CN Comparison November 2026
Microsoft Corporation (TSX: MSFT.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT.TO stands at 274.2B. In comparison, PERK.CN has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT.TO is priced at CA$36.93 on the TSX, while PERK.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas PERK.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, MSFT.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to PERK.CN's ROE of -2.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT.TO is more volatile compared to PERK.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.TO.Check PERK.CN's competition here
Mobilum Technologies Inc. (CNQ: MBLM.CN)
MSFT.TO vs MBLM.CN Comparison November 2026
Microsoft Corporation (TSX: MSFT.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT.TO stands at 274.2B. In comparison, MBLM.CN has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT.TO is priced at CA$36.93 on the TSX, while MBLM.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas MBLM.CN's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, MSFT.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to MBLM.CN's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT.TO is more volatile compared to MBLM.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.TO.Check MBLM.CN's competition here
DeepSpatial Inc. (CNQ: DSAI.CN)
MSFT.TO vs DSAI.CN Comparison November 2026
Microsoft Corporation (TSX: MSFT.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT.TO stands at 274.2B. In comparison, DSAI.CN has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT.TO is priced at CA$36.93 on the TSX, while DSAI.CN trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas DSAI.CN's P/E ratio is -1.72. In terms of profitability, MSFT.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to DSAI.CN's ROE of -2.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT.TO is more volatile compared to DSAI.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.TO.Check DSAI.CN's competition here
Global Compliance Applications Corp. (CNQ: APP.CN)
MSFT.TO vs APP.CN Comparison November 2026
Microsoft Corporation (TSX: MSFT.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT.TO stands at 274.2B. In comparison, APP.CN has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT.TO is priced at CA$36.93 on the TSX, while APP.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas APP.CN's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, MSFT.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to APP.CN's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT.TO is more volatile compared to APP.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.TO.Check APP.CN's competition here
Hero Innovation Group Inc. (CNQ: HRO.CN)
MSFT.TO vs HRO.CN Comparison November 2026
Microsoft Corporation (TSX: MSFT.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT.TO stands at 274.2B. In comparison, HRO.CN has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT.TO is priced at CA$36.93 on the TSX, while HRO.CN trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas HRO.CN's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, MSFT.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to HRO.CN's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT.TO is more volatile compared to HRO.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.TO.Check HRO.CN's competition here
Optiva Inc. (TSX: OPT.TO)
MSFT.TO vs OPT.TO Comparison November 2026
Microsoft Corporation (TSX: MSFT.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT.TO stands at 274.2B. In comparison, OPT.TO has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT.TO is priced at CA$36.93 on the TSX, while OPT.TO trades at CA$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas OPT.TO's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, MSFT.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to OPT.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT.TO is more volatile compared to OPT.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.TO.Check OPT.TO's competition here
ImagineAR Inc. (CNQ: IP.CN)
MSFT.TO vs IP.CN Comparison November 2026
Microsoft Corporation (TSX: MSFT.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT.TO stands at 274.2B. In comparison, IP.CN has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT.TO is priced at CA$36.93 on the TSX, while IP.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas IP.CN's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, MSFT.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to IP.CN's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT.TO is more volatile compared to IP.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.TO.Check IP.CN's competition here
Intellabridge Technology Corp. (CNQ: KASH.CN)
MSFT.TO vs KASH.CN Comparison November 2026
Microsoft Corporation (TSX: MSFT.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT.TO stands at 274.2B. In comparison, KASH.CN has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT.TO is priced at CA$36.93 on the TSX, while KASH.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas KASH.CN's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, MSFT.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to KASH.CN's ROE of -1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT.TO is more volatile compared to KASH.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.TO.Check KASH.CN's competition here
BYND Cannasoft Enterprises Inc. (CNQ: BYND.CN)
MSFT.TO vs BYND.CN Comparison November 2026
Microsoft Corporation (TSX: MSFT.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT.TO stands at 274.2B. In comparison, BYND.CN has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT.TO is priced at CA$36.93 on the TSX, while BYND.CN trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas BYND.CN's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, MSFT.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to BYND.CN's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT.TO is more volatile compared to BYND.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.TO.Check BYND.CN's competition here
AMPD Ventures Inc. (CNQ: AMPD.CN)
MSFT.TO vs AMPD.CN Comparison November 2026
Microsoft Corporation (TSX: MSFT.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT.TO stands at 274.2B. In comparison, AMPD.CN has a market cap of 601.7K. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT.TO is priced at CA$36.93 on the TSX, while AMPD.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas AMPD.CN's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, MSFT.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to AMPD.CN's ROE of -2.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT.TO is more volatile compared to AMPD.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.TO.Check AMPD.CN's competition here
SQID Technologies Limited (CNQ: SQID.CN)
MSFT.TO vs SQID.CN Comparison November 2026
Microsoft Corporation (TSX: MSFT.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT.TO stands at 274.2B. In comparison, SQID.CN has a market cap of 72.1K. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT.TO is priced at CA$36.93 on the TSX, while SQID.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas SQID.CN's P/E ratio is -3.33. In terms of profitability, MSFT.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to SQID.CN's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT.TO is more volatile compared to SQID.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.TO.Check SQID.CN's competition here
Hero Innovation Group Inc. (CNQ: EAP.CN)
MSFT.TO vs EAP.CN Comparison November 2026
Microsoft Corporation (TSX: MSFT.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT.TO stands at 274.2B. In comparison, EAP.CN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT.TO is priced at CA$36.93 on the TSX, while EAP.CN trades at CA$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas EAP.CN's P/E ratio is -3.41. In terms of profitability, MSFT.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to EAP.CN's ROE of +20.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT.TO is not fully comparable compared to EAP.CN. This indicates unavailable risk data in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.TO.Check EAP.CN's competition here
Taal Distributed Information Technologies Inc. (CNQ: TAAL.CN)
MSFT.TO vs TAAL.CN Comparison November 2026
Microsoft Corporation (TSX: MSFT.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT.TO stands at 274.2B. In comparison, TAAL.CN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT.TO is priced at CA$36.93 on the TSX, while TAAL.CN trades at CA$1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas TAAL.CN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MSFT.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to TAAL.CN's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT.TO is not fully comparable compared to TAAL.CN. This indicates unavailable risk data in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.TO.Check TAAL.CN's competition here