Mangalore Refinery and Petrochemicals Limited (MRPL.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MRPL.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MRPL.NS | ₹163.62 | +7.96% | 281B | 14.60 | ₹10.98 | +2.49% |
| RELIANCE.BO | ₹1,259.55 | -0.33% | 17.2T | 20.65 | ₹61.47 | +0.47% |
| RELIANCE.NS | ₹1,258.80 | -0.36% | 17.2T | 21.28 | ₹59.64 | +0.47% |
| IOC.NS | ₹136.88 | +0.94% | 2T | 4.52 | ₹30.56 | +7.24% |
| IOC.BO | ₹136.80 | +0.81% | 1.9T | 4.52 | ₹30.57 | +7.24% |
| BPCL.BO | ₹288.10 | +1.07% | 1.3T | 5.02 | ₹57.60 | +7.78% |
| BPCL.NS | ₹288.00 | +1.00% | 1.3T | 4.78 | ₹60.50 | +7.78% |
| HINDPETRO.NS | ₹374.40 | +0.44% | 812.8B | 4.50 | ₹84.83 | +4.06% |
| HINDPETRO.BO | ₹374.30 | +0.39% | 812.8B | 5.28 | ₹72.35 | +4.06% |
| PETRONET.NS | ₹268.30 | +0.36% | 403.2B | 10.30 | ₹26.09 | +3.72% |
Stock Comparison
MRPL.NS vs RELIANCE.BO Comparison June 2026
MRPL.NS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRPL.NS stands at 281B. In comparison, RELIANCE.BO has a market cap of 17.2T. Regarding current trading prices, MRPL.NS is priced at ₹163.62, while RELIANCE.BO trades at ₹1,259.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.60, whereas RELIANCE.BO's P/E ratio is 20.65. In terms of profitability, MRPL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RELIANCE.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MRPL.NS is more volatile compared to RELIANCE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRPL.NS.Check RELIANCE.BO's competition here
MRPL.NS vs RELIANCE.NS Comparison June 2026
MRPL.NS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRPL.NS stands at 281B. In comparison, RELIANCE.NS has a market cap of 17.2T. Regarding current trading prices, MRPL.NS is priced at ₹163.62, while RELIANCE.NS trades at ₹1,258.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.60, whereas RELIANCE.NS's P/E ratio is 21.28. In terms of profitability, MRPL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RELIANCE.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MRPL.NS is more volatile compared to RELIANCE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRPL.NS.Check RELIANCE.NS's competition here
MRPL.NS vs IOC.NS Comparison June 2026
MRPL.NS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRPL.NS stands at 281B. In comparison, IOC.NS has a market cap of 2T. Regarding current trading prices, MRPL.NS is priced at ₹163.62, while IOC.NS trades at ₹136.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.60, whereas IOC.NS's P/E ratio is 4.52. In terms of profitability, MRPL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IOC.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MRPL.NS is more volatile compared to IOC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRPL.NS.Check IOC.NS's competition here
MRPL.NS vs IOC.BO Comparison June 2026
MRPL.NS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRPL.NS stands at 281B. In comparison, IOC.BO has a market cap of 1.9T. Regarding current trading prices, MRPL.NS is priced at ₹163.62, while IOC.BO trades at ₹136.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.60, whereas IOC.BO's P/E ratio is 4.52. In terms of profitability, MRPL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IOC.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MRPL.NS is more volatile compared to IOC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRPL.NS.Check IOC.BO's competition here
MRPL.NS vs BPCL.BO Comparison June 2026
MRPL.NS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRPL.NS stands at 281B. In comparison, BPCL.BO has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, MRPL.NS is priced at ₹163.62, while BPCL.BO trades at ₹288.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.60, whereas BPCL.BO's P/E ratio is 5.02. In terms of profitability, MRPL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BPCL.BO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MRPL.NS is more volatile compared to BPCL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRPL.NS.Check BPCL.BO's competition here
MRPL.NS vs BPCL.NS Comparison June 2026
MRPL.NS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRPL.NS stands at 281B. In comparison, BPCL.NS has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, MRPL.NS is priced at ₹163.62, while BPCL.NS trades at ₹288.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.60, whereas BPCL.NS's P/E ratio is 4.78. In terms of profitability, MRPL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BPCL.NS's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MRPL.NS is more volatile compared to BPCL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRPL.NS.Check BPCL.NS's competition here
MRPL.NS vs HINDPETRO.NS Comparison June 2026
MRPL.NS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRPL.NS stands at 281B. In comparison, HINDPETRO.NS has a market cap of 812.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MRPL.NS is priced at ₹163.62, while HINDPETRO.NS trades at ₹374.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.60, whereas HINDPETRO.NS's P/E ratio is 4.50. In terms of profitability, MRPL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HINDPETRO.NS's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MRPL.NS is more volatile compared to HINDPETRO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRPL.NS.Check HINDPETRO.NS's competition here
MRPL.NS vs HINDPETRO.BO Comparison June 2026
MRPL.NS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRPL.NS stands at 281B. In comparison, HINDPETRO.BO has a market cap of 812.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MRPL.NS is priced at ₹163.62, while HINDPETRO.BO trades at ₹374.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.60, whereas HINDPETRO.BO's P/E ratio is 5.28. In terms of profitability, MRPL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HINDPETRO.BO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MRPL.NS is more volatile compared to HINDPETRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRPL.NS.Check HINDPETRO.BO's competition here
MRPL.NS vs PETRONET.NS Comparison June 2026
MRPL.NS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRPL.NS stands at 281B. In comparison, PETRONET.NS has a market cap of 403.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MRPL.NS is priced at ₹163.62, while PETRONET.NS trades at ₹268.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.60, whereas PETRONET.NS's P/E ratio is 10.30. In terms of profitability, MRPL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PETRONET.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MRPL.NS is more volatile compared to PETRONET.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRPL.NS.Check PETRONET.NS's competition here
MRPL.NS vs PETRONET.BO Comparison June 2026
MRPL.NS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRPL.NS stands at 281B. In comparison, PETRONET.BO has a market cap of 402.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MRPL.NS is priced at ₹163.62, while PETRONET.BO trades at ₹268.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.60, whereas PETRONET.BO's P/E ratio is 10.29. In terms of profitability, MRPL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PETRONET.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MRPL.NS is more volatile compared to PETRONET.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRPL.NS.Check PETRONET.BO's competition here
MRPL.NS vs MRPL.BO Comparison June 2026
MRPL.NS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRPL.NS stands at 281B. In comparison, MRPL.BO has a market cap of 280.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MRPL.NS is priced at ₹163.62, while MRPL.BO trades at ₹163.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.60, whereas MRPL.BO's P/E ratio is 12.89. In terms of profitability, MRPL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MRPL.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MRPL.NS is more volatile compared to MRPL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRPL.NS.Check MRPL.BO's competition here
MRPL.NS vs AEGISCHEM.NS Comparison June 2026
MRPL.NS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRPL.NS stands at 281B. In comparison, AEGISCHEM.NS has a market cap of 277.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MRPL.NS is priced at ₹163.62, while AEGISCHEM.NS trades at ₹789.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.60, whereas AEGISCHEM.NS's P/E ratio is 48.70. In terms of profitability, MRPL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AEGISCHEM.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MRPL.NS is less volatile compared to AEGISCHEM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRPL.NS.Check AEGISCHEM.NS's competition here
MRPL.NS vs AEGISLOG.BO Comparison June 2026
MRPL.NS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRPL.NS stands at 281B. In comparison, AEGISLOG.BO has a market cap of 274.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MRPL.NS is priced at ₹163.62, while AEGISLOG.BO trades at ₹800.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.60, whereas AEGISLOG.BO's P/E ratio is 30.58. In terms of profitability, MRPL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AEGISLOG.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MRPL.NS is more volatile compared to AEGISLOG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRPL.NS.Check AEGISLOG.BO's competition here
MRPL.NS vs AEGISLOG.NS Comparison June 2026
MRPL.NS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRPL.NS stands at 281B. In comparison, AEGISLOG.NS has a market cap of 274.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MRPL.NS is priced at ₹163.62, while AEGISLOG.NS trades at ₹801.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.60, whereas AEGISLOG.NS's P/E ratio is 30.60. In terms of profitability, MRPL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AEGISLOG.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MRPL.NS is more volatile compared to AEGISLOG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRPL.NS.Check AEGISLOG.NS's competition here
MRPL.NS vs CHENNPETRO.BO Comparison June 2026
MRPL.NS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRPL.NS stands at 281B. In comparison, CHENNPETRO.BO has a market cap of 182.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MRPL.NS is priced at ₹163.62, while CHENNPETRO.BO trades at ₹1,183.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.60, whereas CHENNPETRO.BO's P/E ratio is 8.49. In terms of profitability, MRPL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CHENNPETRO.BO's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MRPL.NS is more volatile compared to CHENNPETRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRPL.NS.Check CHENNPETRO.BO's competition here
MRPL.NS vs CHENNPETRO.NS Comparison June 2026
MRPL.NS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRPL.NS stands at 281B. In comparison, CHENNPETRO.NS has a market cap of 182.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MRPL.NS is priced at ₹163.62, while CHENNPETRO.NS trades at ₹1,184.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.60, whereas CHENNPETRO.NS's P/E ratio is 5.88. In terms of profitability, MRPL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CHENNPETRO.NS's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MRPL.NS is less volatile compared to CHENNPETRO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRPL.NS.Check CHENNPETRO.NS's competition here
MRPL.NS vs CASTROLIND.NS Comparison June 2026
MRPL.NS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRPL.NS stands at 281B. In comparison, CASTROLIND.NS has a market cap of 180.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MRPL.NS is priced at ₹163.62, while CASTROLIND.NS trades at ₹182.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.60, whereas CASTROLIND.NS's P/E ratio is 18.83. In terms of profitability, MRPL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CASTROLIND.NS's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MRPL.NS is more volatile compared to CASTROLIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRPL.NS.Check CASTROLIND.NS's competition here
MRPL.NS vs CASTROLIND.BO Comparison June 2026
MRPL.NS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRPL.NS stands at 281B. In comparison, CASTROLIND.BO has a market cap of 180.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MRPL.NS is priced at ₹163.62, while CASTROLIND.BO trades at ₹182.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.60, whereas CASTROLIND.BO's P/E ratio is 18.83. In terms of profitability, MRPL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CASTROLIND.BO's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MRPL.NS is more volatile compared to CASTROLIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRPL.NS.Check CASTROLIND.BO's competition here
MRPL.NS vs CONFIPET.BO Comparison June 2026
MRPL.NS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRPL.NS stands at 281B. In comparison, CONFIPET.BO has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MRPL.NS is priced at ₹163.62, while CONFIPET.BO trades at ₹72.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.60, whereas CONFIPET.BO's P/E ratio is 27.04. In terms of profitability, MRPL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CONFIPET.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MRPL.NS is less volatile compared to CONFIPET.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRPL.NS.Check CONFIPET.BO's competition here
MRPL.NS vs CONFIPET.NS Comparison June 2026
MRPL.NS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRPL.NS stands at 281B. In comparison, CONFIPET.NS has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MRPL.NS is priced at ₹163.62, while CONFIPET.NS trades at ₹72.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.60, whereas CONFIPET.NS's P/E ratio is 26.96. In terms of profitability, MRPL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CONFIPET.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MRPL.NS is more volatile compared to CONFIPET.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRPL.NS.Check CONFIPET.NS's competition here
MRPL.NS vs PANAMAPET.BO Comparison June 2026
MRPL.NS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRPL.NS stands at 281B. In comparison, PANAMAPET.BO has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MRPL.NS is priced at ₹163.62, while PANAMAPET.BO trades at ₹381.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.60, whereas PANAMAPET.BO's P/E ratio is 10.02. In terms of profitability, MRPL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PANAMAPET.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MRPL.NS is less volatile compared to PANAMAPET.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRPL.NS.Check PANAMAPET.BO's competition here
MRPL.NS vs PANAMAPET.NS Comparison June 2026
MRPL.NS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRPL.NS stands at 281B. In comparison, PANAMAPET.NS has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MRPL.NS is priced at ₹163.62, while PANAMAPET.NS trades at ₹381.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.60, whereas PANAMAPET.NS's P/E ratio is 10.02. In terms of profitability, MRPL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PANAMAPET.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MRPL.NS is less volatile compared to PANAMAPET.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRPL.NS.Check PANAMAPET.NS's competition here
MRPL.NS vs GANDHAR.NS Comparison June 2026
MRPL.NS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRPL.NS stands at 281B. In comparison, GANDHAR.NS has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MRPL.NS is priced at ₹163.62, while GANDHAR.NS trades at ₹156.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.60, whereas GANDHAR.NS's P/E ratio is 11.51. In terms of profitability, MRPL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GANDHAR.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MRPL.NS is more volatile compared to GANDHAR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRPL.NS.Check GANDHAR.NS's competition here
MRPL.NS vs GANDHAR.BO Comparison June 2026
MRPL.NS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRPL.NS stands at 281B. In comparison, GANDHAR.BO has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MRPL.NS is priced at ₹163.62, while GANDHAR.BO trades at ₹157.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.60, whereas GANDHAR.BO's P/E ratio is 11.51. In terms of profitability, MRPL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GANDHAR.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MRPL.NS is more volatile compared to GANDHAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRPL.NS.Check GANDHAR.BO's competition here
MRPL.NS vs GULFPETRO.BO Comparison June 2026
MRPL.NS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRPL.NS stands at 281B. In comparison, GULFPETRO.BO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MRPL.NS is priced at ₹163.62, while GULFPETRO.BO trades at ₹38.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.60, whereas GULFPETRO.BO's P/E ratio is 7.76. In terms of profitability, MRPL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GULFPETRO.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MRPL.NS is more volatile compared to GULFPETRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRPL.NS.Check GULFPETRO.BO's competition here
MRPL.NS vs GULFPETRO.NS Comparison June 2026
MRPL.NS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRPL.NS stands at 281B. In comparison, GULFPETRO.NS has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MRPL.NS is priced at ₹163.62, while GULFPETRO.NS trades at ₹38.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.60, whereas GULFPETRO.NS's P/E ratio is 7.76. In terms of profitability, MRPL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GULFPETRO.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MRPL.NS is more volatile compared to GULFPETRO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRPL.NS.Check GULFPETRO.NS's competition here
MRPL.NS vs CONTPTR.BO Comparison June 2026
MRPL.NS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRPL.NS stands at 281B. In comparison, CONTPTR.BO has a market cap of 508.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MRPL.NS is priced at ₹163.62, while CONTPTR.BO trades at ₹91.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.60, whereas CONTPTR.BO's P/E ratio is 25.41. In terms of profitability, MRPL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CONTPTR.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MRPL.NS is more volatile compared to CONTPTR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRPL.NS.Check CONTPTR.BO's competition here
MRPL.NS vs PROGREXV.BO Comparison June 2026
MRPL.NS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRPL.NS stands at 281B. In comparison, PROGREXV.BO has a market cap of 111.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MRPL.NS is priced at ₹163.62, while PROGREXV.BO trades at ₹31.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.60, whereas PROGREXV.BO's P/E ratio is -3105.00. In terms of profitability, MRPL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PROGREXV.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MRPL.NS is more volatile compared to PROGREXV.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRPL.NS.Check PROGREXV.BO's competition here