Mangalore Refinery and Petrochemicals Limited
Mangalore Refinery and Petrochemicals Limited (MRPL.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MRPL.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MRPL.NS | ₹197.14 | -1.48% | 345.5B | 15.87 | ₹12.42 | N/A |
| RELIANCE.NS | ₹1,428.80 | +0.00% | 18.9T | 22.76 | ₹61.44 | +0.39% |
| RELIANCE.BO | ₹1,430.15 | +0.00% | 18.9T | 22.75 | ₹61.47 | +0.39% |
| IOC.BO | ₹186.50 | +1.91% | 2.6T | 7.18 | ₹25.97 | +4.37% |
| IOC.NS | ₹186.47 | +1.88% | 2.6T | 7.19 | ₹25.95 | +4.37% |
| BPCL.NS | ₹386.00 | +1.30% | 1.7T | 6.70 | ₹57.59 | +5.90% |
| BPCL.BO | ₹385.90 | +1.29% | 1.7T | 6.70 | ₹57.60 | +5.90% |
| HINDPETRO.NS | ₹444.00 | +1.67% | 944.8B | 6.14 | ₹72.36 | +3.55% |
| HINDPETRO.BO | ₹443.95 | +1.66% | 944.6B | 6.14 | ₹72.35 | +3.55% |
| PETRONET.BO | ₹317.05 | +1.07% | 475.6B | 13.07 | ₹24.25 | +3.19% |
Stock Comparison
MRPL.NS vs RELIANCE.NS Comparison February 2026
MRPL.NS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRPL.NS stands at 345.5B. In comparison, RELIANCE.NS has a market cap of 18.9T. Regarding current trading prices, MRPL.NS is priced at ₹197.14, while RELIANCE.NS trades at ₹1,428.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.87, whereas RELIANCE.NS's P/E ratio is 22.76. In terms of profitability, MRPL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RELIANCE.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MRPL.NS is more volatile compared to RELIANCE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRPL.NS.Check RELIANCE.NS's competition here
MRPL.NS vs RELIANCE.BO Comparison February 2026
MRPL.NS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRPL.NS stands at 345.5B. In comparison, RELIANCE.BO has a market cap of 18.9T. Regarding current trading prices, MRPL.NS is priced at ₹197.14, while RELIANCE.BO trades at ₹1,430.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.87, whereas RELIANCE.BO's P/E ratio is 22.75. In terms of profitability, MRPL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RELIANCE.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MRPL.NS is more volatile compared to RELIANCE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRPL.NS.Check RELIANCE.BO's competition here
MRPL.NS vs IOC.BO Comparison February 2026
MRPL.NS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRPL.NS stands at 345.5B. In comparison, IOC.BO has a market cap of 2.6T. Regarding current trading prices, MRPL.NS is priced at ₹197.14, while IOC.BO trades at ₹186.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.87, whereas IOC.BO's P/E ratio is 7.18. In terms of profitability, MRPL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IOC.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MRPL.NS is more volatile compared to IOC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRPL.NS.Check IOC.BO's competition here
MRPL.NS vs IOC.NS Comparison February 2026
MRPL.NS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRPL.NS stands at 345.5B. In comparison, IOC.NS has a market cap of 2.6T. Regarding current trading prices, MRPL.NS is priced at ₹197.14, while IOC.NS trades at ₹186.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.87, whereas IOC.NS's P/E ratio is 7.19. In terms of profitability, MRPL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IOC.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MRPL.NS is more volatile compared to IOC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRPL.NS.Check IOC.NS's competition here
MRPL.NS vs BPCL.NS Comparison February 2026
MRPL.NS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRPL.NS stands at 345.5B. In comparison, BPCL.NS has a market cap of 1.7T. Regarding current trading prices, MRPL.NS is priced at ₹197.14, while BPCL.NS trades at ₹386.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.87, whereas BPCL.NS's P/E ratio is 6.70. In terms of profitability, MRPL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BPCL.NS's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MRPL.NS is more volatile compared to BPCL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRPL.NS.Check BPCL.NS's competition here
MRPL.NS vs BPCL.BO Comparison February 2026
MRPL.NS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRPL.NS stands at 345.5B. In comparison, BPCL.BO has a market cap of 1.7T. Regarding current trading prices, MRPL.NS is priced at ₹197.14, while BPCL.BO trades at ₹385.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.87, whereas BPCL.BO's P/E ratio is 6.70. In terms of profitability, MRPL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BPCL.BO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MRPL.NS is more volatile compared to BPCL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRPL.NS.Check BPCL.BO's competition here
MRPL.NS vs HINDPETRO.NS Comparison February 2026
MRPL.NS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRPL.NS stands at 345.5B. In comparison, HINDPETRO.NS has a market cap of 944.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MRPL.NS is priced at ₹197.14, while HINDPETRO.NS trades at ₹444.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.87, whereas HINDPETRO.NS's P/E ratio is 6.14. In terms of profitability, MRPL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HINDPETRO.NS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MRPL.NS is more volatile compared to HINDPETRO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRPL.NS.Check HINDPETRO.NS's competition here
MRPL.NS vs HINDPETRO.BO Comparison February 2026
MRPL.NS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRPL.NS stands at 345.5B. In comparison, HINDPETRO.BO has a market cap of 944.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MRPL.NS is priced at ₹197.14, while HINDPETRO.BO trades at ₹443.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.87, whereas HINDPETRO.BO's P/E ratio is 6.14. In terms of profitability, MRPL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HINDPETRO.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MRPL.NS is more volatile compared to HINDPETRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRPL.NS.Check HINDPETRO.BO's competition here
MRPL.NS vs PETRONET.BO Comparison February 2026
MRPL.NS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRPL.NS stands at 345.5B. In comparison, PETRONET.BO has a market cap of 475.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MRPL.NS is priced at ₹197.14, while PETRONET.BO trades at ₹317.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.87, whereas PETRONET.BO's P/E ratio is 13.07. In terms of profitability, MRPL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PETRONET.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MRPL.NS is more volatile compared to PETRONET.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRPL.NS.Check PETRONET.BO's competition here
MRPL.NS vs PETRONET.NS Comparison February 2026
MRPL.NS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRPL.NS stands at 345.5B. In comparison, PETRONET.NS has a market cap of 475.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MRPL.NS is priced at ₹197.14, while PETRONET.NS trades at ₹317.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.87, whereas PETRONET.NS's P/E ratio is 13.08. In terms of profitability, MRPL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PETRONET.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MRPL.NS is more volatile compared to PETRONET.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRPL.NS.Check PETRONET.NS's competition here
MRPL.NS vs MRPL.BO Comparison February 2026
MRPL.NS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRPL.NS stands at 345.5B. In comparison, MRPL.BO has a market cap of 345.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MRPL.NS is priced at ₹197.14, while MRPL.BO trades at ₹197.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.87, whereas MRPL.BO's P/E ratio is 15.86. In terms of profitability, MRPL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MRPL.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MRPL.NS is less volatile compared to MRPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRPL.NS.Check MRPL.BO's competition here
MRPL.NS vs AEGISCHEM.NS Comparison February 2026
MRPL.NS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRPL.NS stands at 345.5B. In comparison, AEGISCHEM.NS has a market cap of 277.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MRPL.NS is priced at ₹197.14, while AEGISCHEM.NS trades at ₹789.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.87, whereas AEGISCHEM.NS's P/E ratio is 48.70. In terms of profitability, MRPL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AEGISCHEM.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MRPL.NS is less volatile compared to AEGISCHEM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRPL.NS.Check AEGISCHEM.NS's competition here
MRPL.NS vs AEGISLOG.NS Comparison February 2026
MRPL.NS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRPL.NS stands at 345.5B. In comparison, AEGISLOG.NS has a market cap of 245.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MRPL.NS is priced at ₹197.14, while AEGISLOG.NS trades at ₹698.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.87, whereas AEGISLOG.NS's P/E ratio is 31.91. In terms of profitability, MRPL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AEGISLOG.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MRPL.NS is less volatile compared to AEGISLOG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRPL.NS.Check AEGISLOG.NS's competition here
MRPL.NS vs CASTROLIND.NS Comparison February 2026
MRPL.NS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRPL.NS stands at 345.5B. In comparison, CASTROLIND.NS has a market cap of 185.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MRPL.NS is priced at ₹197.14, while CASTROLIND.NS trades at ₹187.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.87, whereas CASTROLIND.NS's P/E ratio is 19.53. In terms of profitability, MRPL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CASTROLIND.NS's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MRPL.NS is more volatile compared to CASTROLIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRPL.NS.Check CASTROLIND.NS's competition here
MRPL.NS vs CASTROLIND.BO Comparison February 2026
MRPL.NS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRPL.NS stands at 345.5B. In comparison, CASTROLIND.BO has a market cap of 185.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MRPL.NS is priced at ₹197.14, while CASTROLIND.BO trades at ₹187.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.87, whereas CASTROLIND.BO's P/E ratio is 19.52. In terms of profitability, MRPL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CASTROLIND.BO's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MRPL.NS is more volatile compared to CASTROLIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRPL.NS.Check CASTROLIND.BO's competition here
MRPL.NS vs CHENNPETRO.NS Comparison February 2026
MRPL.NS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRPL.NS stands at 345.5B. In comparison, CHENNPETRO.NS has a market cap of 136.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MRPL.NS is priced at ₹197.14, while CHENNPETRO.NS trades at ₹916.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.87, whereas CHENNPETRO.NS's P/E ratio is 6.34. In terms of profitability, MRPL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CHENNPETRO.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MRPL.NS is more volatile compared to CHENNPETRO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRPL.NS.Check CHENNPETRO.NS's competition here
MRPL.NS vs CHENNPETRO.BO Comparison February 2026
MRPL.NS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRPL.NS stands at 345.5B. In comparison, CHENNPETRO.BO has a market cap of 136.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MRPL.NS is priced at ₹197.14, while CHENNPETRO.BO trades at ₹916.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.87, whereas CHENNPETRO.BO's P/E ratio is 6.34. In terms of profitability, MRPL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CHENNPETRO.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MRPL.NS is more volatile compared to CHENNPETRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRPL.NS.Check CHENNPETRO.BO's competition here
MRPL.NS vs PANAMAPET.NS Comparison February 2026
MRPL.NS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRPL.NS stands at 345.5B. In comparison, PANAMAPET.NS has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, MRPL.NS is priced at ₹197.14, while PANAMAPET.NS trades at ₹281.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.87, whereas PANAMAPET.NS's P/E ratio is 9.19. In terms of profitability, MRPL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PANAMAPET.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MRPL.NS is more volatile compared to PANAMAPET.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRPL.NS.Check PANAMAPET.NS's competition here
MRPL.NS vs PANAMAPET.BO Comparison February 2026
MRPL.NS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRPL.NS stands at 345.5B. In comparison, PANAMAPET.BO has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MRPL.NS is priced at ₹197.14, while PANAMAPET.BO trades at ₹278.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.87, whereas PANAMAPET.BO's P/E ratio is 9.11. In terms of profitability, MRPL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PANAMAPET.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MRPL.NS is more volatile compared to PANAMAPET.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRPL.NS.Check PANAMAPET.BO's competition here
MRPL.NS vs GANDHAR.NS Comparison February 2026
MRPL.NS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRPL.NS stands at 345.5B. In comparison, GANDHAR.NS has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MRPL.NS is priced at ₹197.14, while GANDHAR.NS trades at ₹139.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.87, whereas GANDHAR.NS's P/E ratio is 12.85. In terms of profitability, MRPL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GANDHAR.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MRPL.NS is more volatile compared to GANDHAR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRPL.NS.Check GANDHAR.NS's competition here
MRPL.NS vs GANDHAR.BO Comparison February 2026
MRPL.NS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRPL.NS stands at 345.5B. In comparison, GANDHAR.BO has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MRPL.NS is priced at ₹197.14, while GANDHAR.BO trades at ₹139.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.87, whereas GANDHAR.BO's P/E ratio is 12.84. In terms of profitability, MRPL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GANDHAR.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MRPL.NS is more volatile compared to GANDHAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRPL.NS.Check GANDHAR.BO's competition here
MRPL.NS vs CONFIPET.BO Comparison February 2026
MRPL.NS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRPL.NS stands at 345.5B. In comparison, CONFIPET.BO has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MRPL.NS is priced at ₹197.14, while CONFIPET.BO trades at ₹31.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.87, whereas CONFIPET.BO's P/E ratio is 12.55. In terms of profitability, MRPL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CONFIPET.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MRPL.NS is more volatile compared to CONFIPET.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRPL.NS.Check CONFIPET.BO's competition here
MRPL.NS vs CONFIPET.NS Comparison February 2026
MRPL.NS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRPL.NS stands at 345.5B. In comparison, CONFIPET.NS has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MRPL.NS is priced at ₹197.14, while CONFIPET.NS trades at ₹31.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.87, whereas CONFIPET.NS's P/E ratio is 12.54. In terms of profitability, MRPL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CONFIPET.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MRPL.NS is more volatile compared to CONFIPET.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRPL.NS.Check CONFIPET.NS's competition here
MRPL.NS vs GULFPETRO.BO Comparison February 2026
MRPL.NS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRPL.NS stands at 345.5B. In comparison, GULFPETRO.BO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MRPL.NS is priced at ₹197.14, while GULFPETRO.BO trades at ₹32.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.87, whereas GULFPETRO.BO's P/E ratio is 6.06. In terms of profitability, MRPL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GULFPETRO.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MRPL.NS is less volatile compared to GULFPETRO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRPL.NS.Check GULFPETRO.BO's competition here
MRPL.NS vs GULFPETRO.NS Comparison February 2026
MRPL.NS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRPL.NS stands at 345.5B. In comparison, GULFPETRO.NS has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MRPL.NS is priced at ₹197.14, while GULFPETRO.NS trades at ₹32.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.87, whereas GULFPETRO.NS's P/E ratio is 6.04. In terms of profitability, MRPL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GULFPETRO.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MRPL.NS is more volatile compared to GULFPETRO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRPL.NS.Check GULFPETRO.NS's competition here
MRPL.NS vs CONTPTR.BO Comparison February 2026
MRPL.NS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRPL.NS stands at 345.5B. In comparison, CONTPTR.BO has a market cap of 492.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MRPL.NS is priced at ₹197.14, while CONTPTR.BO trades at ₹88.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.87, whereas CONTPTR.BO's P/E ratio is 17.33. In terms of profitability, MRPL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CONTPTR.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MRPL.NS is less volatile compared to CONTPTR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRPL.NS.Check CONTPTR.BO's competition here
MRPL.NS vs PROGREXV.BO Comparison February 2026
MRPL.NS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRPL.NS stands at 345.5B. In comparison, PROGREXV.BO has a market cap of 96.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MRPL.NS is priced at ₹197.14, while PROGREXV.BO trades at ₹26.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.87, whereas PROGREXV.BO's P/E ratio is -2684.00. In terms of profitability, MRPL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PROGREXV.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MRPL.NS is more volatile compared to PROGREXV.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRPL.NS.Check PROGREXV.BO's competition here