Mangalore Refinery and Petrochemicals Limited
Mangalore Refinery and Petrochemicals Limited (MRPL.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MRPL.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MRPL.NS | ₹177.10 | -4.86% | 310.4B | 14.26 | ₹12.42 | +2.03% |
| RELIANCE.BO | ₹1,348.25 | -4.55% | 18.2T | 21.93 | ₹61.47 | +0.41% |
| RELIANCE.NS | ₹1,348.10 | -4.60% | 18.2T | 21.93 | ₹61.47 | +0.41% |
| IOC.NS | ₹137.76 | -1.96% | 1.9T | 5.31 | ₹25.95 | +7.11% |
| IOC.BO | ₹137.75 | -2.06% | 1.9T | 5.31 | ₹25.96 | +7.11% |
| BPCL.NS | ₹282.70 | -0.65% | 1.2T | 4.91 | ₹57.59 | +7.96% |
| BPCL.BO | ₹282.55 | -0.72% | 1.2T | 4.91 | ₹57.60 | +7.96% |
| HINDPETRO.NS | ₹340.90 | -0.90% | 725.4B | 4.71 | ₹72.38 | +4.55% |
| HINDPETRO.BO | ₹340.75 | -1.00% | 725.1B | 4.71 | ₹72.35 | +4.55% |
| PETRONET.NS | ₹246.20 | -1.46% | 369.3B | 10.16 | ₹24.24 | +4.06% |
Stock Comparison
MRPL.NS vs RELIANCE.BO Comparison April 2026
MRPL.NS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRPL.NS stands at 310.4B. In comparison, RELIANCE.BO has a market cap of 18.2T. Regarding current trading prices, MRPL.NS is priced at ₹177.10, while RELIANCE.BO trades at ₹1,348.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.26, whereas RELIANCE.BO's P/E ratio is 21.93. In terms of profitability, MRPL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RELIANCE.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MRPL.NS is more volatile compared to RELIANCE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRPL.NS.Check RELIANCE.BO's competition here
MRPL.NS vs RELIANCE.NS Comparison April 2026
MRPL.NS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRPL.NS stands at 310.4B. In comparison, RELIANCE.NS has a market cap of 18.2T. Regarding current trading prices, MRPL.NS is priced at ₹177.10, while RELIANCE.NS trades at ₹1,348.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.26, whereas RELIANCE.NS's P/E ratio is 21.93. In terms of profitability, MRPL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RELIANCE.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MRPL.NS is more volatile compared to RELIANCE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRPL.NS.Check RELIANCE.NS's competition here
MRPL.NS vs IOC.NS Comparison April 2026
MRPL.NS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRPL.NS stands at 310.4B. In comparison, IOC.NS has a market cap of 1.9T. Regarding current trading prices, MRPL.NS is priced at ₹177.10, while IOC.NS trades at ₹137.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.26, whereas IOC.NS's P/E ratio is 5.31. In terms of profitability, MRPL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IOC.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MRPL.NS is more volatile compared to IOC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRPL.NS.Check IOC.NS's competition here
MRPL.NS vs IOC.BO Comparison April 2026
MRPL.NS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRPL.NS stands at 310.4B. In comparison, IOC.BO has a market cap of 1.9T. Regarding current trading prices, MRPL.NS is priced at ₹177.10, while IOC.BO trades at ₹137.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.26, whereas IOC.BO's P/E ratio is 5.31. In terms of profitability, MRPL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IOC.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MRPL.NS is more volatile compared to IOC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRPL.NS.Check IOC.BO's competition here
MRPL.NS vs BPCL.NS Comparison April 2026
MRPL.NS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRPL.NS stands at 310.4B. In comparison, BPCL.NS has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, MRPL.NS is priced at ₹177.10, while BPCL.NS trades at ₹282.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.26, whereas BPCL.NS's P/E ratio is 4.91. In terms of profitability, MRPL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BPCL.NS's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MRPL.NS is more volatile compared to BPCL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRPL.NS.Check BPCL.NS's competition here
MRPL.NS vs BPCL.BO Comparison April 2026
MRPL.NS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRPL.NS stands at 310.4B. In comparison, BPCL.BO has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, MRPL.NS is priced at ₹177.10, while BPCL.BO trades at ₹282.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.26, whereas BPCL.BO's P/E ratio is 4.91. In terms of profitability, MRPL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BPCL.BO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MRPL.NS is more volatile compared to BPCL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRPL.NS.Check BPCL.BO's competition here
MRPL.NS vs HINDPETRO.NS Comparison April 2026
MRPL.NS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRPL.NS stands at 310.4B. In comparison, HINDPETRO.NS has a market cap of 725.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MRPL.NS is priced at ₹177.10, while HINDPETRO.NS trades at ₹340.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.26, whereas HINDPETRO.NS's P/E ratio is 4.71. In terms of profitability, MRPL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HINDPETRO.NS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MRPL.NS is more volatile compared to HINDPETRO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRPL.NS.Check HINDPETRO.NS's competition here
MRPL.NS vs HINDPETRO.BO Comparison April 2026
MRPL.NS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRPL.NS stands at 310.4B. In comparison, HINDPETRO.BO has a market cap of 725.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MRPL.NS is priced at ₹177.10, while HINDPETRO.BO trades at ₹340.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.26, whereas HINDPETRO.BO's P/E ratio is 4.71. In terms of profitability, MRPL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HINDPETRO.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MRPL.NS is more volatile compared to HINDPETRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRPL.NS.Check HINDPETRO.BO's competition here
MRPL.NS vs PETRONET.NS Comparison April 2026
MRPL.NS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRPL.NS stands at 310.4B. In comparison, PETRONET.NS has a market cap of 369.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MRPL.NS is priced at ₹177.10, while PETRONET.NS trades at ₹246.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.26, whereas PETRONET.NS's P/E ratio is 10.16. In terms of profitability, MRPL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PETRONET.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MRPL.NS is more volatile compared to PETRONET.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRPL.NS.Check PETRONET.NS's competition here
MRPL.NS vs PETRONET.BO Comparison April 2026
MRPL.NS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRPL.NS stands at 310.4B. In comparison, PETRONET.BO has a market cap of 369B. Regarding current trading prices, MRPL.NS is priced at ₹177.10, while PETRONET.BO trades at ₹246.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.26, whereas PETRONET.BO's P/E ratio is 10.14. In terms of profitability, MRPL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PETRONET.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MRPL.NS is more volatile compared to PETRONET.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRPL.NS.Check PETRONET.BO's competition here
MRPL.NS vs MRPL.BO Comparison April 2026
MRPL.NS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRPL.NS stands at 310.4B. In comparison, MRPL.BO has a market cap of 310.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MRPL.NS is priced at ₹177.10, while MRPL.BO trades at ₹176.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.26, whereas MRPL.BO's P/E ratio is 14.24. In terms of profitability, MRPL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MRPL.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MRPL.NS is more volatile compared to MRPL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRPL.NS.Check MRPL.BO's competition here
MRPL.NS vs AEGISCHEM.NS Comparison April 2026
MRPL.NS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRPL.NS stands at 310.4B. In comparison, AEGISCHEM.NS has a market cap of 277.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MRPL.NS is priced at ₹177.10, while AEGISCHEM.NS trades at ₹789.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.26, whereas AEGISCHEM.NS's P/E ratio is 48.70. In terms of profitability, MRPL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AEGISCHEM.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MRPL.NS is less volatile compared to AEGISCHEM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRPL.NS.Check AEGISCHEM.NS's competition here
MRPL.NS vs AEGISLOG.NS Comparison April 2026
MRPL.NS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRPL.NS stands at 310.4B. In comparison, AEGISLOG.NS has a market cap of 214.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MRPL.NS is priced at ₹177.10, while AEGISLOG.NS trades at ₹612.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.26, whereas AEGISLOG.NS's P/E ratio is 27.95. In terms of profitability, MRPL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AEGISLOG.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MRPL.NS is more volatile compared to AEGISLOG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRPL.NS.Check AEGISLOG.NS's competition here
MRPL.NS vs CASTROLIND.BO Comparison April 2026
MRPL.NS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRPL.NS stands at 310.4B. In comparison, CASTROLIND.BO has a market cap of 173.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MRPL.NS is priced at ₹177.10, while CASTROLIND.BO trades at ₹175.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.26, whereas CASTROLIND.BO's P/E ratio is 18.26. In terms of profitability, MRPL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CASTROLIND.BO's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MRPL.NS is more volatile compared to CASTROLIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRPL.NS.Check CASTROLIND.BO's competition here
MRPL.NS vs CASTROLIND.NS Comparison April 2026
MRPL.NS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRPL.NS stands at 310.4B. In comparison, CASTROLIND.NS has a market cap of 173.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MRPL.NS is priced at ₹177.10, while CASTROLIND.NS trades at ₹175.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.26, whereas CASTROLIND.NS's P/E ratio is 18.24. In terms of profitability, MRPL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CASTROLIND.NS's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MRPL.NS is more volatile compared to CASTROLIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRPL.NS.Check CASTROLIND.NS's competition here
MRPL.NS vs CHENNPETRO.NS Comparison April 2026
MRPL.NS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRPL.NS stands at 310.4B. In comparison, CHENNPETRO.NS has a market cap of 142.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MRPL.NS is priced at ₹177.10, while CHENNPETRO.NS trades at ₹959.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.26, whereas CHENNPETRO.NS's P/E ratio is 6.64. In terms of profitability, MRPL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CHENNPETRO.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MRPL.NS is less volatile compared to CHENNPETRO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRPL.NS.Check CHENNPETRO.NS's competition here
MRPL.NS vs CHENNPETRO.BO Comparison April 2026
MRPL.NS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRPL.NS stands at 310.4B. In comparison, CHENNPETRO.BO has a market cap of 142.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MRPL.NS is priced at ₹177.10, while CHENNPETRO.BO trades at ₹958.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.26, whereas CHENNPETRO.BO's P/E ratio is 6.63. In terms of profitability, MRPL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CHENNPETRO.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MRPL.NS is less volatile compared to CHENNPETRO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRPL.NS.Check CHENNPETRO.BO's competition here
MRPL.NS vs PANAMAPET.BO Comparison April 2026
MRPL.NS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRPL.NS stands at 310.4B. In comparison, PANAMAPET.BO has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MRPL.NS is priced at ₹177.10, while PANAMAPET.BO trades at ₹251.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.26, whereas PANAMAPET.BO's P/E ratio is 8.20. In terms of profitability, MRPL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PANAMAPET.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MRPL.NS is more volatile compared to PANAMAPET.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRPL.NS.Check PANAMAPET.BO's competition here
MRPL.NS vs PANAMAPET.NS Comparison April 2026
MRPL.NS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRPL.NS stands at 310.4B. In comparison, PANAMAPET.NS has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MRPL.NS is priced at ₹177.10, while PANAMAPET.NS trades at ₹250.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.26, whereas PANAMAPET.NS's P/E ratio is 8.19. In terms of profitability, MRPL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PANAMAPET.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MRPL.NS is more volatile compared to PANAMAPET.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRPL.NS.Check PANAMAPET.NS's competition here
MRPL.NS vs CONFIPET.BO Comparison April 2026
MRPL.NS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRPL.NS stands at 310.4B. In comparison, CONFIPET.BO has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MRPL.NS is priced at ₹177.10, while CONFIPET.BO trades at ₹38.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.26, whereas CONFIPET.BO's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, MRPL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CONFIPET.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MRPL.NS is less volatile compared to CONFIPET.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRPL.NS.Check CONFIPET.BO's competition here
MRPL.NS vs CONFIPET.NS Comparison April 2026
MRPL.NS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRPL.NS stands at 310.4B. In comparison, CONFIPET.NS has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MRPL.NS is priced at ₹177.10, while CONFIPET.NS trades at ₹38.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.26, whereas CONFIPET.NS's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, MRPL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CONFIPET.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MRPL.NS is less volatile compared to CONFIPET.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRPL.NS.Check CONFIPET.NS's competition here
MRPL.NS vs GANDHAR.NS Comparison April 2026
MRPL.NS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRPL.NS stands at 310.4B. In comparison, GANDHAR.NS has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MRPL.NS is priced at ₹177.10, while GANDHAR.NS trades at ₹123.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.26, whereas GANDHAR.NS's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, MRPL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GANDHAR.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MRPL.NS is more volatile compared to GANDHAR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRPL.NS.Check GANDHAR.NS's competition here
MRPL.NS vs GANDHAR.BO Comparison April 2026
MRPL.NS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRPL.NS stands at 310.4B. In comparison, GANDHAR.BO has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MRPL.NS is priced at ₹177.10, while GANDHAR.BO trades at ₹123.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.26, whereas GANDHAR.BO's P/E ratio is 11.36. In terms of profitability, MRPL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GANDHAR.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MRPL.NS is more volatile compared to GANDHAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRPL.NS.Check GANDHAR.BO's competition here
MRPL.NS vs GULFPETRO.BO Comparison April 2026
MRPL.NS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRPL.NS stands at 310.4B. In comparison, GULFPETRO.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MRPL.NS is priced at ₹177.10, while GULFPETRO.BO trades at ₹25.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.26, whereas GULFPETRO.BO's P/E ratio is 5.08. In terms of profitability, MRPL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GULFPETRO.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MRPL.NS is less volatile compared to GULFPETRO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRPL.NS.Check GULFPETRO.BO's competition here
MRPL.NS vs GULFPETRO.NS Comparison April 2026
MRPL.NS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRPL.NS stands at 310.4B. In comparison, GULFPETRO.NS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MRPL.NS is priced at ₹177.10, while GULFPETRO.NS trades at ₹25.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.26, whereas GULFPETRO.NS's P/E ratio is 5.08. In terms of profitability, MRPL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GULFPETRO.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MRPL.NS is less volatile compared to GULFPETRO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRPL.NS.Check GULFPETRO.NS's competition here
MRPL.NS vs CONTPTR.BO Comparison April 2026
MRPL.NS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRPL.NS stands at 310.4B. In comparison, CONTPTR.BO has a market cap of 440M. Regarding current trading prices, MRPL.NS is priced at ₹177.10, while CONTPTR.BO trades at ₹79.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.26, whereas CONTPTR.BO's P/E ratio is 19.58. In terms of profitability, MRPL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CONTPTR.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MRPL.NS is less volatile compared to CONTPTR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRPL.NS.Check CONTPTR.BO's competition here
MRPL.NS vs PROGREXV.BO Comparison April 2026
MRPL.NS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRPL.NS stands at 310.4B. In comparison, PROGREXV.BO has a market cap of 101.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MRPL.NS is priced at ₹177.10, while PROGREXV.BO trades at ₹28.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.26, whereas PROGREXV.BO's P/E ratio is -2818.00. In terms of profitability, MRPL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PROGREXV.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MRPL.NS is more volatile compared to PROGREXV.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRPL.NS.Check PROGREXV.BO's competition here