Mountain Province Diamonds Inc.
Mountain Province Diamonds Inc. MPVD.TO Peers
See (MPVD.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Other Precious Metals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MPVD.TO | CA$0.06 | +0.00% | 11.7M | 0.29 | CA$0.19 | N/A |
| TFPM.TO | CA$33.53 | +1.91% | 6.7B | 838.25 | CA$0.04 | +0.92% |
| CGG.TO | CA$12.01 | -1.88% | 4.8B | 20.02 | CA$0.60 | +0.93% |
| SIL.TO | CA$15.01 | -8.64% | 2.2B | 18.30 | CA$0.82 | N/A |
| EDR.TO | CA$7.16 | +4.83% | 2.1B | -21.06 | -CA$0.34 | N/A |
| GMIN.TO | CA$17.40 | +0.29% | 1.9B | 24.51 | CA$0.71 | N/A |
| PPTA.TO | CA$17.93 | +5.47% | 1.9B | -44.82 | -CA$0.40 | N/A |
| ARIS.TO | CA$9.77 | +3.17% | 1.7B | 44.41 | CA$0.22 | N/A |
| GATO.TO | CA$21.59 | +5.73% | 1.5B | 32.22 | CA$0.67 | N/A |
| SLS.TO | CA$7.82 | +3.85% | 1.3B | -11.33 | -CA$0.69 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MPVD.TO vs TFPM.TO Comparison
MPVD.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPVD.TO stands at 11.7M. In comparison, TFPM.TO has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MPVD.TO is priced at CA$0.06, while TFPM.TO trades at CA$33.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPVD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas TFPM.TO's P/E ratio is 838.25. In terms of profitability, MPVD.TO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to TFPM.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MPVD.TO is more volatile compared to TFPM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPVD.TO.
MPVD.TO vs CGG.TO Comparison
MPVD.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPVD.TO stands at 11.7M. In comparison, CGG.TO has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MPVD.TO is priced at CA$0.06, while CGG.TO trades at CA$12.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPVD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas CGG.TO's P/E ratio is 20.02. In terms of profitability, MPVD.TO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to CGG.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MPVD.TO is more volatile compared to CGG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPVD.TO.
MPVD.TO vs SIL.TO Comparison
MPVD.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPVD.TO stands at 11.7M. In comparison, SIL.TO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MPVD.TO is priced at CA$0.06, while SIL.TO trades at CA$15.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPVD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas SIL.TO's P/E ratio is 18.30. In terms of profitability, MPVD.TO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to SIL.TO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MPVD.TO is less volatile compared to SIL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPVD.TO.
MPVD.TO vs EDR.TO Comparison
MPVD.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPVD.TO stands at 11.7M. In comparison, EDR.TO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MPVD.TO is priced at CA$0.06, while EDR.TO trades at CA$7.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPVD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas EDR.TO's P/E ratio is -21.06. In terms of profitability, MPVD.TO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to EDR.TO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MPVD.TO is more volatile compared to EDR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPVD.TO.
MPVD.TO vs GMIN.TO Comparison
MPVD.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPVD.TO stands at 11.7M. In comparison, GMIN.TO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MPVD.TO is priced at CA$0.06, while GMIN.TO trades at CA$17.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPVD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas GMIN.TO's P/E ratio is 24.51. In terms of profitability, MPVD.TO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to GMIN.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MPVD.TO is more volatile compared to GMIN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPVD.TO.
MPVD.TO vs PPTA.TO Comparison
MPVD.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPVD.TO stands at 11.7M. In comparison, PPTA.TO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MPVD.TO is priced at CA$0.06, while PPTA.TO trades at CA$17.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPVD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas PPTA.TO's P/E ratio is -44.82. In terms of profitability, MPVD.TO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to PPTA.TO's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MPVD.TO is more volatile compared to PPTA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPVD.TO.
MPVD.TO vs ARIS.TO Comparison
MPVD.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPVD.TO stands at 11.7M. In comparison, ARIS.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MPVD.TO is priced at CA$0.06, while ARIS.TO trades at CA$9.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPVD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas ARIS.TO's P/E ratio is 44.41. In terms of profitability, MPVD.TO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to ARIS.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MPVD.TO is more volatile compared to ARIS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPVD.TO.
MPVD.TO vs GATO.TO Comparison
MPVD.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPVD.TO stands at 11.7M. In comparison, GATO.TO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MPVD.TO is priced at CA$0.06, while GATO.TO trades at CA$21.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPVD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas GATO.TO's P/E ratio is 32.22. In terms of profitability, MPVD.TO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to GATO.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MPVD.TO is more volatile compared to GATO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPVD.TO.
MPVD.TO vs SLS.TO Comparison
MPVD.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPVD.TO stands at 11.7M. In comparison, SLS.TO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MPVD.TO is priced at CA$0.06, while SLS.TO trades at CA$7.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPVD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas SLS.TO's P/E ratio is -11.33. In terms of profitability, MPVD.TO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to SLS.TO's ROE of -14.57%. Regarding short-term risk, MPVD.TO is less volatile compared to SLS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPVD.TO.
MPVD.TO vs MUX.TO Comparison
MPVD.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPVD.TO stands at 11.7M. In comparison, MUX.TO has a market cap of 840M. Regarding current trading prices, MPVD.TO is priced at CA$0.06, while MUX.TO trades at CA$15.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPVD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas MUX.TO's P/E ratio is -19.95. In terms of profitability, MPVD.TO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to MUX.TO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MPVD.TO is more volatile compared to MUX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPVD.TO.
MPVD.TO vs ABRA.TO Comparison
MPVD.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPVD.TO stands at 11.7M. In comparison, ABRA.TO has a market cap of 797.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MPVD.TO is priced at CA$0.06, while ABRA.TO trades at CA$5.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPVD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas ABRA.TO's P/E ratio is -20.12. In terms of profitability, MPVD.TO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to ABRA.TO's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, MPVD.TO is more volatile compared to ABRA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPVD.TO.
MPVD.TO vs GGD.TO Comparison
MPVD.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPVD.TO stands at 11.7M. In comparison, GGD.TO has a market cap of 731.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MPVD.TO is priced at CA$0.06, while GGD.TO trades at CA$2.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPVD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas GGD.TO's P/E ratio is 211.00. In terms of profitability, MPVD.TO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to GGD.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MPVD.TO is more volatile compared to GGD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPVD.TO.
MPVD.TO vs ASM.TO Comparison
MPVD.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPVD.TO stands at 11.7M. In comparison, ASM.TO has a market cap of 729.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MPVD.TO is priced at CA$0.06, while ASM.TO trades at CA$5.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPVD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas ASM.TO's P/E ratio is 36.00. In terms of profitability, MPVD.TO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to ASM.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MPVD.TO is more volatile compared to ASM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPVD.TO.
MPVD.TO vs NUAG.TO Comparison
MPVD.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPVD.TO stands at 11.7M. In comparison, NUAG.TO has a market cap of 370.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MPVD.TO is priced at CA$0.06, while NUAG.TO trades at CA$2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPVD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas NUAG.TO's P/E ratio is -54.00. In terms of profitability, MPVD.TO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to NUAG.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MPVD.TO is more volatile compared to NUAG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPVD.TO.
MPVD.TO vs ALLI.NE Comparison
MPVD.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPVD.TO stands at 11.7M. In comparison, ALLI.NE has a market cap of 276.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MPVD.TO is priced at CA$0.06, while ALLI.NE trades at CA$1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPVD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas ALLI.NE's P/E ratio is -24.50. In terms of profitability, MPVD.TO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to ALLI.NE's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MPVD.TO is more volatile compared to ALLI.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPVD.TO.
MPVD.TO vs VOXR.TO Comparison
MPVD.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPVD.TO stands at 11.7M. In comparison, VOXR.TO has a market cap of 235M. Regarding current trading prices, MPVD.TO is priced at CA$0.06, while VOXR.TO trades at CA$4.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPVD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas VOXR.TO's P/E ratio is -92.60. In terms of profitability, MPVD.TO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to VOXR.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MPVD.TO is more volatile compared to VOXR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPVD.TO.
MPVD.TO vs HSLV.CN Comparison
MPVD.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPVD.TO stands at 11.7M. In comparison, HSLV.CN has a market cap of 230.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MPVD.TO is priced at CA$0.06, while HSLV.CN trades at CA$2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPVD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas HSLV.CN's P/E ratio is -73.33. In terms of profitability, MPVD.TO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to HSLV.CN's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MPVD.TO is more volatile compared to HSLV.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPVD.TO.
MPVD.TO vs PTM.TO Comparison
MPVD.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPVD.TO stands at 11.7M. In comparison, PTM.TO has a market cap of 223M. Regarding current trading prices, MPVD.TO is priced at CA$0.06, while PTM.TO trades at CA$2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPVD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas PTM.TO's P/E ratio is -30.29. In terms of profitability, MPVD.TO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to PTM.TO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MPVD.TO is more volatile compared to PTM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPVD.TO.
MPVD.TO vs XAM.TO Comparison
MPVD.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPVD.TO stands at 11.7M. In comparison, XAM.TO has a market cap of 160.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MPVD.TO is priced at CA$0.06, while XAM.TO trades at CA$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPVD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas XAM.TO's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, MPVD.TO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to XAM.TO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MPVD.TO is more volatile compared to XAM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPVD.TO.
MPVD.TO vs LUC.TO Comparison
MPVD.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPVD.TO stands at 11.7M. In comparison, LUC.TO has a market cap of 108.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MPVD.TO is priced at CA$0.06, while LUC.TO trades at CA$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPVD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas LUC.TO's P/E ratio is 1.71. In terms of profitability, MPVD.TO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to LUC.TO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MPVD.TO is more volatile compared to LUC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPVD.TO.
MPVD.TO vs ESAU.CN Comparison
MPVD.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPVD.TO stands at 11.7M. In comparison, ESAU.CN has a market cap of 96.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MPVD.TO is priced at CA$0.06, while ESAU.CN trades at CA$1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPVD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas ESAU.CN's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, MPVD.TO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to ESAU.CN's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MPVD.TO is less volatile compared to ESAU.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPVD.TO.
MPVD.TO vs SM.V Comparison
MPVD.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPVD.TO stands at 11.7M. In comparison, SM.V has a market cap of 81.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MPVD.TO is priced at CA$0.06, while SM.V trades at CA$0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPVD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas SM.V's P/E ratio is -24.00. In terms of profitability, MPVD.TO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to SM.V's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MPVD.TO is more volatile compared to SM.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPVD.TO.
MPVD.TO vs ORV.TO Comparison
MPVD.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPVD.TO stands at 11.7M. In comparison, ORV.TO has a market cap of 71M. Regarding current trading prices, MPVD.TO is priced at CA$0.06, while ORV.TO trades at CA$0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPVD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas ORV.TO's P/E ratio is 52.00. In terms of profitability, MPVD.TO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to ORV.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MPVD.TO is more volatile compared to ORV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPVD.TO.
MPVD.TO vs ELR.TO Comparison
MPVD.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPVD.TO stands at 11.7M. In comparison, ELR.TO has a market cap of 51.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MPVD.TO is priced at CA$0.06, while ELR.TO trades at CA$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPVD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas ELR.TO's P/E ratio is -2.32. In terms of profitability, MPVD.TO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to ELR.TO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MPVD.TO is more volatile compared to ELR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPVD.TO.
MPVD.TO vs DMET.NE Comparison
MPVD.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPVD.TO stands at 11.7M. In comparison, DMET.NE has a market cap of 50.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MPVD.TO is priced at CA$0.06, while DMET.NE trades at CA$0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPVD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas DMET.NE's P/E ratio is -2.42. In terms of profitability, MPVD.TO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to DMET.NE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MPVD.TO is more volatile compared to DMET.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPVD.TO.
MPVD.TO vs CUAU.CN Comparison
MPVD.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPVD.TO stands at 11.7M. In comparison, CUAU.CN has a market cap of 39.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MPVD.TO is priced at CA$0.06, while CUAU.CN trades at CA$0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPVD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas CUAU.CN's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, MPVD.TO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to CUAU.CN's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, MPVD.TO is more volatile compared to CUAU.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPVD.TO.
MPVD.TO vs DIAM.TO Comparison
MPVD.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPVD.TO stands at 11.7M. In comparison, DIAM.TO has a market cap of 37.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MPVD.TO is priced at CA$0.06, while DIAM.TO trades at CA$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPVD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas DIAM.TO's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, MPVD.TO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to DIAM.TO's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, MPVD.TO is more volatile compared to DIAM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPVD.TO.
MPVD.TO vs PAU.CN Comparison
MPVD.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPVD.TO stands at 11.7M. In comparison, PAU.CN has a market cap of 31.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MPVD.TO is priced at CA$0.06, while PAU.CN trades at CA$0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPVD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas PAU.CN's P/E ratio is -22.50. In terms of profitability, MPVD.TO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to PAU.CN's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MPVD.TO is more volatile compared to PAU.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPVD.TO.
MPVD.TO vs AUCU.CN Comparison
MPVD.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPVD.TO stands at 11.7M. In comparison, AUCU.CN has a market cap of 28.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MPVD.TO is priced at CA$0.06, while AUCU.CN trades at CA$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPVD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas AUCU.CN's P/E ratio is -8.33. In terms of profitability, MPVD.TO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to AUCU.CN's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MPVD.TO is more volatile compared to AUCU.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPVD.TO.
MPVD.TO vs ITKO.CN Comparison
MPVD.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPVD.TO stands at 11.7M. In comparison, ITKO.CN has a market cap of 27.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MPVD.TO is priced at CA$0.06, while ITKO.CN trades at CA$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPVD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas ITKO.CN's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, MPVD.TO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to ITKO.CN's ROE of -17.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MPVD.TO is less volatile compared to ITKO.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPVD.TO.
MPVD.TO vs EMPS.CN Comparison
MPVD.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPVD.TO stands at 11.7M. In comparison, EMPS.CN has a market cap of 26.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MPVD.TO is priced at CA$0.06, while EMPS.CN trades at CA$0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPVD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas EMPS.CN's P/E ratio is -7.67. In terms of profitability, MPVD.TO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to EMPS.CN's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MPVD.TO is more volatile compared to EMPS.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPVD.TO.
MPVD.TO vs NVRO.CN Comparison
MPVD.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPVD.TO stands at 11.7M. In comparison, NVRO.CN has a market cap of 24.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MPVD.TO is priced at CA$0.06, while NVRO.CN trades at CA$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPVD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas NVRO.CN's P/E ratio is -9.50. In terms of profitability, MPVD.TO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to NVRO.CN's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, MPVD.TO is more volatile compared to NVRO.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPVD.TO.
MPVD.TO vs CLCO.V Comparison
MPVD.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPVD.TO stands at 11.7M. In comparison, CLCO.V has a market cap of 14.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MPVD.TO is priced at CA$0.06, while CLCO.V trades at CA$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPVD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas CLCO.V's P/E ratio is -3.70. In terms of profitability, MPVD.TO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to CLCO.V's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MPVD.TO is more volatile compared to CLCO.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPVD.TO.
MPVD.TO vs CUPR.CN Comparison
MPVD.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPVD.TO stands at 11.7M. In comparison, CUPR.CN has a market cap of 14.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MPVD.TO is priced at CA$0.06, while CUPR.CN trades at CA$0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPVD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas CUPR.CN's P/E ratio is -7.67. In terms of profitability, MPVD.TO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to CUPR.CN's ROE of +7.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MPVD.TO is more volatile compared to CUPR.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPVD.TO.
MPVD.TO vs ATHA.CN Comparison
MPVD.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPVD.TO stands at 11.7M. In comparison, ATHA.CN has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MPVD.TO is priced at CA$0.06, while ATHA.CN trades at CA$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPVD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas ATHA.CN's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, MPVD.TO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to ATHA.CN's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MPVD.TO is more volatile compared to ATHA.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPVD.TO.
MPVD.TO vs CAM.V Comparison
MPVD.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPVD.TO stands at 11.7M. In comparison, CAM.V has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MPVD.TO is priced at CA$0.06, while CAM.V trades at CA$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPVD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas CAM.V's P/E ratio is -1.68. In terms of profitability, MPVD.TO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to CAM.V's ROE of -2.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MPVD.TO is less volatile compared to CAM.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPVD.TO.
MPVD.TO vs FTEL.CN Comparison
MPVD.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPVD.TO stands at 11.7M. In comparison, FTEL.CN has a market cap of 12.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MPVD.TO is priced at CA$0.06, while FTEL.CN trades at CA$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPVD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas FTEL.CN's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, MPVD.TO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to FTEL.CN's ROE of +11.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MPVD.TO and FTEL.CN have similar daily volatility (9.52).
MPVD.TO vs AUAG.CN Comparison
MPVD.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPVD.TO stands at 11.7M. In comparison, AUAG.CN has a market cap of 11.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MPVD.TO is priced at CA$0.06, while AUAG.CN trades at CA$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPVD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas AUAG.CN's P/E ratio is 1.28. In terms of profitability, MPVD.TO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to AUAG.CN's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, MPVD.TO is more volatile compared to AUAG.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPVD.TO.
MPVD.TO vs TGLD.CN Comparison
MPVD.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPVD.TO stands at 11.7M. In comparison, TGLD.CN has a market cap of 9.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MPVD.TO is priced at CA$0.06, while TGLD.CN trades at CA$0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPVD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas TGLD.CN's P/E ratio is -19.00. In terms of profitability, MPVD.TO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to TGLD.CN's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, MPVD.TO is less volatile compared to TGLD.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPVD.TO.
MPVD.TO vs IGLD.CN Comparison
MPVD.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPVD.TO stands at 11.7M. In comparison, IGLD.CN has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MPVD.TO is priced at CA$0.06, while IGLD.CN trades at CA$0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPVD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas IGLD.CN's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, MPVD.TO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to IGLD.CN's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. MPVD.TO has daily volatility of 9.52 and IGLD.CN has daily volatility of N/A.
MPVD.TO vs SIZE.NE Comparison
MPVD.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPVD.TO stands at 11.7M. In comparison, SIZE.NE has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MPVD.TO is priced at CA$0.06, while SIZE.NE trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPVD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas SIZE.NE's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, MPVD.TO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to SIZE.NE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MPVD.TO is less volatile compared to SIZE.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPVD.TO.
MPVD.TO vs LECR.CN Comparison
MPVD.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPVD.TO stands at 11.7M. In comparison, LECR.CN has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MPVD.TO is priced at CA$0.06, while LECR.CN trades at CA$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPVD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas LECR.CN's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, MPVD.TO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to LECR.CN's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MPVD.TO is more volatile compared to LECR.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPVD.TO.
MPVD.TO vs CFE.CN Comparison
MPVD.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPVD.TO stands at 11.7M. In comparison, CFE.CN has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MPVD.TO is priced at CA$0.06, while CFE.CN trades at CA$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPVD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas CFE.CN's P/E ratio is -2.30. In terms of profitability, MPVD.TO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to CFE.CN's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MPVD.TO is more volatile compared to CFE.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPVD.TO.
MPVD.TO vs HML.CN Comparison
MPVD.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPVD.TO stands at 11.7M. In comparison, HML.CN has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, MPVD.TO is priced at CA$0.06, while HML.CN trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPVD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas HML.CN's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, MPVD.TO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to HML.CN's ROE of -24.98%. Regarding short-term risk, MPVD.TO is more volatile compared to HML.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPVD.TO.
MPVD.TO vs ACDX.CN Comparison
MPVD.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPVD.TO stands at 11.7M. In comparison, ACDX.CN has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MPVD.TO is priced at CA$0.06, while ACDX.CN trades at CA$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPVD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas ACDX.CN's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, MPVD.TO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to ACDX.CN's ROE of -1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MPVD.TO is more volatile compared to ACDX.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPVD.TO.
MPVD.TO vs WDGY.CN Comparison
MPVD.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPVD.TO stands at 11.7M. In comparison, WDGY.CN has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MPVD.TO is priced at CA$0.06, while WDGY.CN trades at CA$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPVD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas WDGY.CN's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, MPVD.TO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to WDGY.CN's ROE of -2.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MPVD.TO is more volatile compared to WDGY.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPVD.TO.
MPVD.TO vs MLKM.CN Comparison
MPVD.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPVD.TO stands at 11.7M. In comparison, MLKM.CN has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MPVD.TO is priced at CA$0.06, while MLKM.CN trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPVD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas MLKM.CN's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, MPVD.TO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to MLKM.CN's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MPVD.TO is less volatile compared to MLKM.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPVD.TO.
MPVD.TO vs CRC.CN Comparison
MPVD.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPVD.TO stands at 11.7M. In comparison, CRC.CN has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MPVD.TO is priced at CA$0.06, while CRC.CN trades at CA$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPVD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas CRC.CN's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, MPVD.TO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to CRC.CN's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MPVD.TO is less volatile compared to CRC.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPVD.TO.
MPVD.TO vs AUMN.TO Comparison
MPVD.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPVD.TO stands at 11.7M. In comparison, AUMN.TO has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MPVD.TO is priced at CA$0.06, while AUMN.TO trades at CA$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPVD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas AUMN.TO's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, MPVD.TO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to AUMN.TO's ROE of +3.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MPVD.TO is more volatile compared to AUMN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPVD.TO.
MPVD.TO vs TAI.CN Comparison
MPVD.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPVD.TO stands at 11.7M. In comparison, TAI.CN has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, MPVD.TO is priced at CA$0.06, while TAI.CN trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPVD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas TAI.CN's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, MPVD.TO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to TAI.CN's ROE of -3.84%. Regarding short-term risk, MPVD.TO is more volatile compared to TAI.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPVD.TO.
MPVD.TO vs ORGN.CN Comparison
MPVD.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPVD.TO stands at 11.7M. In comparison, ORGN.CN has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, MPVD.TO is priced at CA$0.06, while ORGN.CN trades at CA$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPVD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas ORGN.CN's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, MPVD.TO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to ORGN.CN's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, MPVD.TO is more volatile compared to ORGN.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPVD.TO.
MPVD.TO vs GLDS.CN Comparison
MPVD.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPVD.TO stands at 11.7M. In comparison, GLDS.CN has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MPVD.TO is priced at CA$0.06, while GLDS.CN trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPVD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas GLDS.CN's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, MPVD.TO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to GLDS.CN's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MPVD.TO is less volatile compared to GLDS.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPVD.TO.
MPVD.TO vs LTHM.CN Comparison
MPVD.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPVD.TO stands at 11.7M. In comparison, LTHM.CN has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MPVD.TO is priced at CA$0.06, while LTHM.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPVD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas LTHM.CN's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, MPVD.TO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to LTHM.CN's ROE of +7.93%. Regarding short-term risk, MPVD.TO is less volatile compared to LTHM.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPVD.TO.
MPVD.TO vs PNGC.CN Comparison
MPVD.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPVD.TO stands at 11.7M. In comparison, PNGC.CN has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MPVD.TO is priced at CA$0.06, while PNGC.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPVD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas PNGC.CN's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, MPVD.TO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to PNGC.CN's ROE of +1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MPVD.TO is more volatile compared to PNGC.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPVD.TO.
MPVD.TO vs PMS.CN Comparison
MPVD.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPVD.TO stands at 11.7M. In comparison, PMS.CN has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MPVD.TO is priced at CA$0.06, while PMS.CN trades at CA$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPVD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas PMS.CN's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, MPVD.TO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to PMS.CN's ROE of +177.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MPVD.TO is more volatile compared to PMS.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPVD.TO.
MPVD.TO vs FABL.CN Comparison
MPVD.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPVD.TO stands at 11.7M. In comparison, FABL.CN has a market cap of 869.8K. Regarding current trading prices, MPVD.TO is priced at CA$0.06, while FABL.CN trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPVD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas FABL.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, MPVD.TO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to FABL.CN's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, MPVD.TO is more volatile compared to FABL.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPVD.TO.
MPVD.TO vs TAUR.CN Comparison
MPVD.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPVD.TO stands at 11.7M. In comparison, TAUR.CN has a market cap of 754.4K. Regarding current trading prices, MPVD.TO is priced at CA$0.06, while TAUR.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPVD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas TAUR.CN's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, MPVD.TO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to TAUR.CN's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MPVD.TO is less volatile compared to TAUR.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPVD.TO.
MPVD.TO vs NVR.CN Comparison
MPVD.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPVD.TO stands at 11.7M. In comparison, NVR.CN has a market cap of 719.3K. Regarding current trading prices, MPVD.TO is priced at CA$0.06, while NVR.CN trades at CA$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPVD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas NVR.CN's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, MPVD.TO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to NVR.CN's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, MPVD.TO is more volatile compared to NVR.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPVD.TO.
MPVD.TO vs SAND.CN Comparison
MPVD.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPVD.TO stands at 11.7M. In comparison, SAND.CN has a market cap of 505.4K. Regarding current trading prices, MPVD.TO is priced at CA$0.06, while SAND.CN trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPVD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas SAND.CN's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, MPVD.TO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to SAND.CN's ROE of +286.91%. Regarding short-term risk, MPVD.TO is more volatile compared to SAND.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPVD.TO.
MPVD.TO vs AGE.CN Comparison
MPVD.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPVD.TO stands at 11.7M. In comparison, AGE.CN has a market cap of 327.4K. Regarding current trading prices, MPVD.TO is priced at CA$0.06, while AGE.CN trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPVD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas AGE.CN's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, MPVD.TO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to AGE.CN's ROE of -1.63%. Regarding short-term risk, MPVD.TO is more volatile compared to AGE.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPVD.TO.
MPVD.TO vs MUSK.CN Comparison
MPVD.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPVD.TO stands at 11.7M. In comparison, MUSK.CN has a market cap of 76.3K. Regarding current trading prices, MPVD.TO is priced at CA$0.06, while MUSK.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPVD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas MUSK.CN's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, MPVD.TO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to MUSK.CN's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, MPVD.TO is less volatile compared to MUSK.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPVD.TO.
MPVD.TO vs GCM.TO Comparison
MPVD.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPVD.TO stands at 11.7M. In comparison, GCM.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MPVD.TO is priced at CA$0.06, while GCM.TO trades at CA$3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPVD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas GCM.TO's P/E ratio is 6.35. In terms of profitability, MPVD.TO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to GCM.TO's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, MPVD.TO is more volatile compared to GCM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPVD.TO.
MPVD.TO vs MMX.TO Comparison
MPVD.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPVD.TO stands at 11.7M. In comparison, MMX.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MPVD.TO is priced at CA$0.06, while MMX.TO trades at CA$6.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPVD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas MMX.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MPVD.TO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to MMX.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MPVD.TO is more volatile compared to MMX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPVD.TO.
MPVD.TO vs PFB.TO Comparison
MPVD.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPVD.TO stands at 11.7M. In comparison, PFB.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MPVD.TO is priced at CA$0.06, while PFB.TO trades at CA$24.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPVD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas PFB.TO's P/E ratio is 11.02. In terms of profitability, MPVD.TO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to PFB.TO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MPVD.TO is more volatile compared to PFB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPVD.TO.
MPVD.TO vs FOXY.CN Comparison
MPVD.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPVD.TO stands at 11.7M. In comparison, FOXY.CN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MPVD.TO is priced at CA$0.06, while FOXY.CN trades at CA$0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPVD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas FOXY.CN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MPVD.TO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to FOXY.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MPVD.TO is less volatile compared to FOXY.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPVD.TO.
MPVD.TO vs NSR.TO Comparison
MPVD.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPVD.TO stands at 11.7M. In comparison, NSR.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MPVD.TO is priced at CA$0.06, while NSR.TO trades at CA$9.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPVD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas NSR.TO's P/E ratio is 967.00. In terms of profitability, MPVD.TO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to NSR.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MPVD.TO is more volatile compared to NSR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPVD.TO.
MPVD.TO vs XGC.TO Comparison
MPVD.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPVD.TO stands at 11.7M. In comparison, XGC.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MPVD.TO is priced at CA$0.06, while XGC.TO trades at CA$30.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPVD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas XGC.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MPVD.TO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to XGC.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MPVD.TO is more volatile compared to XGC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPVD.TO.
MPVD.TO vs AXU.TO Comparison
MPVD.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPVD.TO stands at 11.7M. In comparison, AXU.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MPVD.TO is priced at CA$0.06, while AXU.TO trades at CA$0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPVD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas AXU.TO's P/E ratio is -5.24. In terms of profitability, MPVD.TO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to AXU.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MPVD.TO is more volatile compared to AXU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPVD.TO.