Mondi plc
Mondi plc MONDF Peers
See (MONDF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Stock Comparison
MONDF vs KLBAY Comparison
MONDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MONDF stands at 8.18B. In comparison, KLBAY has a market cap of 20.34B. Regarding current trading prices, MONDF is priced at $18.53, while KLBAY trades at $6.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MONDF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.70, whereas KLBAY's P/E ratio is 60.82. In terms of profitability, MONDF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to KLBAY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MONDF and KLBAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MONDF vs UPMMY Comparison
MONDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MONDF stands at 8.18B. In comparison, UPMMY has a market cap of 14.09B. Regarding current trading prices, MONDF is priced at $18.53, while UPMMY trades at $26.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MONDF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.70, whereas UPMMY's P/E ratio is 29.69. In terms of profitability, MONDF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to UPMMY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MONDF is less volatile compared to UPMMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MONDF.
MONDF vs UPMKF Comparison
MONDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MONDF stands at 8.18B. In comparison, UPMKF has a market cap of 13.76B. Regarding current trading prices, MONDF is priced at $18.53, while UPMKF trades at $25.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MONDF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.70, whereas UPMKF's P/E ratio is 39.69. In terms of profitability, MONDF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to UPMKF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MONDF is less volatile compared to UPMKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MONDF.
MONDF vs SUZ Comparison
MONDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MONDF stands at 8.18B. In comparison, SUZ has a market cap of 10.97B. Regarding current trading prices, MONDF is priced at $18.53, while SUZ trades at $8.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MONDF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.70, whereas SUZ's P/E ratio is -9.42. In terms of profitability, MONDF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SUZ's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MONDF is less volatile compared to SUZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MONDF.
MONDF vs SCABY Comparison
MONDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MONDF stands at 8.18B. In comparison, SCABY has a market cap of 9.17B. Regarding current trading prices, MONDF is priced at $18.53, while SCABY trades at $14.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MONDF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.70, whereas SCABY's P/E ratio is 26.56. In terms of profitability, MONDF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SCABY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MONDF is less volatile compared to SCABY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MONDF.
MONDF vs SVCBF Comparison
MONDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MONDF stands at 8.18B. In comparison, SVCBF has a market cap of 8.81B. Regarding current trading prices, MONDF is priced at $18.53, while SVCBF trades at $12.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MONDF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.70, whereas SVCBF's P/E ratio is 23.24. In terms of profitability, MONDF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SVCBF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MONDF is less volatile compared to SVCBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MONDF.
MONDF vs SEOAY Comparison
MONDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MONDF stands at 8.18B. In comparison, SEOAY has a market cap of 7.50B. Regarding current trading prices, MONDF is priced at $18.53, while SEOAY trades at $9.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MONDF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.70, whereas SEOAY's P/E ratio is -61.53. In terms of profitability, MONDF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SEOAY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MONDF is less volatile compared to SEOAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MONDF.
MONDF vs SEOJF Comparison
MONDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MONDF stands at 8.18B. In comparison, SEOJF has a market cap of 6.96B. Regarding current trading prices, MONDF is priced at $18.53, while SEOJF trades at $8.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MONDF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.70, whereas SEOJF's P/E ratio is -57.07. In terms of profitability, MONDF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SEOJF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MONDF is less volatile compared to SEOJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MONDF.
MONDF vs MONDY Comparison
MONDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MONDF stands at 8.18B. In comparison, MONDY has a market cap of 6.79B. Regarding current trading prices, MONDF is priced at $18.53, while MONDY trades at $30.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MONDF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.70, whereas MONDY's P/E ratio is 27.61. In terms of profitability, MONDF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MONDY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MONDF is less volatile compared to MONDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MONDF.
MONDF vs LPX Comparison
MONDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MONDF stands at 8.18B. In comparison, LPX has a market cap of 6.10B. Regarding current trading prices, MONDF is priced at $18.53, while LPX trades at $87.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MONDF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.70, whereas LPX's P/E ratio is 14.86. In terms of profitability, MONDF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to LPX's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MONDF is less volatile compared to LPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MONDF.
MONDF vs UFPI Comparison
MONDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MONDF stands at 8.18B. In comparison, UFPI has a market cap of 6.06B. Regarding current trading prices, MONDF is priced at $18.53, while UFPI trades at $99.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MONDF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.70, whereas UFPI's P/E ratio is 14.71. In terms of profitability, MONDF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to UFPI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MONDF is less volatile compared to UFPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MONDF.
MONDF vs WFG Comparison
MONDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MONDF stands at 8.18B. In comparison, WFG has a market cap of 5.74B. Regarding current trading prices, MONDF is priced at $18.53, while WFG trades at $74.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MONDF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.70, whereas WFG's P/E ratio is -1060.00. In terms of profitability, MONDF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to WFG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MONDF is less volatile compared to WFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MONDF.
MONDF vs OJIPF Comparison
MONDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MONDF stands at 8.18B. In comparison, OJIPF has a market cap of 4.44B. Regarding current trading prices, MONDF is priced at $18.53, while OJIPF trades at $4.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MONDF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.70, whereas OJIPF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, MONDF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to OJIPF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MONDF and OJIPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MONDF vs OJIPY Comparison
MONDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MONDF stands at 8.18B. In comparison, OJIPY has a market cap of 4.37B. Regarding current trading prices, MONDF is priced at $18.53, while OJIPY trades at $45.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MONDF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.70, whereas OJIPY's P/E ratio is 10.89. In terms of profitability, MONDF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to OJIPY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MONDF is less volatile compared to OJIPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MONDF.
MONDF vs RTTNY Comparison
MONDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MONDF stands at 8.18B. In comparison, RTTNY has a market cap of 3.50B. Regarding current trading prices, MONDF is priced at $18.53, while RTTNY trades at $22.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MONDF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.70, whereas RTTNY's P/E ratio is 18.09. In terms of profitability, MONDF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to RTTNY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MONDF and RTTNY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MONDF vs POELF Comparison
MONDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MONDF stands at 8.18B. In comparison, POELF has a market cap of 3.14B. Regarding current trading prices, MONDF is priced at $18.53, while POELF trades at $4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MONDF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.70, whereas POELF's P/E ratio is 9.61. In terms of profitability, MONDF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to POELF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MONDF is less volatile compared to POELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MONDF.
MONDF vs STLJF Comparison
MONDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MONDF stands at 8.18B. In comparison, STLJF has a market cap of 2.68B. Regarding current trading prices, MONDF is priced at $18.53, while STLJF trades at $48.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MONDF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.70, whereas STLJF's P/E ratio is 11.74. In terms of profitability, MONDF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to STLJF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MONDF is less volatile compared to STLJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MONDF.
MONDF vs HLMNY Comparison
MONDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MONDF stands at 8.18B. In comparison, HLMNY has a market cap of 2.46B. Regarding current trading prices, MONDF is priced at $18.53, while HLMNY trades at $17.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MONDF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.70, whereas HLMNY's P/E ratio is 20.85. In terms of profitability, MONDF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HLMNY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MONDF is less volatile compared to HLMNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MONDF.
MONDF vs SLVM Comparison
MONDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MONDF stands at 8.18B. In comparison, SLVM has a market cap of 2.42B. Regarding current trading prices, MONDF is priced at $18.53, while SLVM trades at $59.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MONDF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.70, whereas SLVM's P/E ratio is 8.29. In terms of profitability, MONDF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SLVM's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MONDF is less volatile compared to SLVM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MONDF.
MONDF vs BLRDF Comparison
MONDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MONDF stands at 8.18B. In comparison, BLRDF has a market cap of 2.36B. Regarding current trading prices, MONDF is priced at $18.53, while BLRDF trades at $9.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MONDF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.70, whereas BLRDF's P/E ratio is 13.19. In terms of profitability, MONDF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BLRDF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MONDF is less volatile compared to BLRDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MONDF.
MONDF vs PIKQF Comparison
MONDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MONDF stands at 8.18B. In comparison, PIKQF has a market cap of 1.91B. Regarding current trading prices, MONDF is priced at $18.53, while PIKQF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MONDF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.70, whereas PIKQF's P/E ratio is 4.36. In terms of profitability, MONDF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PIKQF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MONDF and PIKQF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MONDF vs NDGPY Comparison
MONDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MONDF stands at 8.18B. In comparison, NDGPY has a market cap of 1.77B. Regarding current trading prices, MONDF is priced at $18.53, while NDGPY trades at $7.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MONDF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.70, whereas NDGPY's P/E ratio is 13.55. In terms of profitability, MONDF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NDGPY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MONDF and NDGPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MONDF vs RFP Comparison
MONDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MONDF stands at 8.18B. In comparison, RFP has a market cap of 1.68B. Regarding current trading prices, MONDF is priced at $18.53, while RFP trades at $21.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MONDF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.70, whereas RFP's P/E ratio is 18.96. In terms of profitability, MONDF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to RFP's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MONDF is less volatile compared to RFP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MONDF.
MONDF vs NDGPF Comparison
MONDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MONDF stands at 8.18B. In comparison, NDGPF has a market cap of 1.64B. Regarding current trading prices, MONDF is priced at $18.53, while NDGPF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MONDF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.70, whereas NDGPF's P/E ratio is 11.67. In terms of profitability, MONDF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NDGPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MONDF is less volatile compared to NDGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MONDF.
MONDF vs SWM Comparison
MONDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MONDF stands at 8.18B. In comparison, SWM has a market cap of 1.29B. Regarding current trading prices, MONDF is priced at $18.53, while SWM trades at $23.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MONDF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.70, whereas SWM's P/E ratio is 10.79. In terms of profitability, MONDF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SWM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MONDF is less volatile compared to SWM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MONDF.
MONDF vs SPPJY Comparison
MONDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MONDF stands at 8.18B. In comparison, SPPJY has a market cap of 1.25B. Regarding current trading prices, MONDF is priced at $18.53, while SPPJY trades at $2.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MONDF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.70, whereas SPPJY's P/E ratio is 5.07. In terms of profitability, MONDF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SPPJY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MONDF is less volatile compared to SPPJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MONDF.
MONDF vs LMPMF Comparison
MONDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MONDF stands at 8.18B. In comparison, LMPMF has a market cap of 1.20B. Regarding current trading prices, MONDF is priced at $18.53, while LMPMF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MONDF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.70, whereas LMPMF's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, MONDF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to LMPMF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MONDF and LMPMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MONDF vs CFPZF Comparison
MONDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MONDF stands at 8.18B. In comparison, CFPZF has a market cap of 1.15B. Regarding current trading prices, MONDF is priced at $18.53, while CFPZF trades at $9.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MONDF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.70, whereas CFPZF's P/E ratio is -2.38. In terms of profitability, MONDF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CFPZF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MONDF is less volatile compared to CFPZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MONDF.
MONDF vs LMPMY Comparison
MONDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MONDF stands at 8.18B. In comparison, LMPMY has a market cap of 1.15B. Regarding current trading prices, MONDF is priced at $18.53, while LMPMY trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MONDF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.70, whereas LMPMY's P/E ratio is 6.67. In terms of profitability, MONDF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to LMPMY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MONDF is less volatile compared to LMPMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MONDF.
MONDF vs NIJPF Comparison
MONDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MONDF stands at 8.18B. In comparison, NIJPF has a market cap of 782.64M. Regarding current trading prices, MONDF is priced at $18.53, while NIJPF trades at $6.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MONDF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.70, whereas NIJPF's P/E ratio is 3.61. In terms of profitability, MONDF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NIJPF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MONDF is less volatile compared to NIJPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MONDF.
MONDF vs TKFTF Comparison
MONDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MONDF stands at 8.18B. In comparison, TKFTF has a market cap of 703.81M. Regarding current trading prices, MONDF is priced at $18.53, while TKFTF trades at $10.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MONDF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.70, whereas TKFTF's P/E ratio is 32.55. In terms of profitability, MONDF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TKFTF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MONDF and TKFTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MONDF vs IFSPF Comparison
MONDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MONDF stands at 8.18B. In comparison, IFSPF has a market cap of 501.67M. Regarding current trading prices, MONDF is priced at $18.53, while IFSPF trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MONDF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.70, whereas IFSPF's P/E ratio is -2.27. In terms of profitability, MONDF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to IFSPF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MONDF is less volatile compared to IFSPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MONDF.
MONDF vs CLW Comparison
MONDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MONDF stands at 8.18B. In comparison, CLW has a market cap of 423.46M. Regarding current trading prices, MONDF is priced at $18.53, while CLW trades at $26.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MONDF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.70, whereas CLW's P/E ratio is -6.03. In terms of profitability, MONDF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CLW's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MONDF is less volatile compared to CLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MONDF.
MONDF vs PKNOF Comparison
MONDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MONDF stands at 8.18B. In comparison, PKNOF has a market cap of 319.16M. Regarding current trading prices, MONDF is priced at $18.53, while PKNOF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MONDF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.70, whereas PKNOF's P/E ratio is 12.95. In terms of profitability, MONDF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PKNOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MONDF and PKNOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MONDF vs MATV Comparison
MONDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MONDF stands at 8.18B. In comparison, MATV has a market cap of 285.40M. Regarding current trading prices, MONDF is priced at $18.53, while MATV trades at $5.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MONDF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.70, whereas MATV's P/E ratio is -5.82. In terms of profitability, MONDF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MATV's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MONDF is less volatile compared to MATV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MONDF.
MONDF vs MERC Comparison
MONDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MONDF stands at 8.18B. In comparison, MERC has a market cap of 234.05M. Regarding current trading prices, MONDF is priced at $18.53, while MERC trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MONDF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.70, whereas MERC's P/E ratio is -2.59. In terms of profitability, MONDF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MERC's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MONDF is less volatile compared to MERC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MONDF.
MONDF vs ACAZF Comparison
MONDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MONDF stands at 8.18B. In comparison, ACAZF has a market cap of 223.14M. Regarding current trading prices, MONDF is priced at $18.53, while ACAZF trades at $12.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MONDF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.70, whereas ACAZF's P/E ratio is 14.39. In terms of profitability, MONDF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ACAZF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MONDF is less volatile compared to ACAZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MONDF.
MONDF vs RTERF Comparison
MONDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MONDF stands at 8.18B. In comparison, RTERF has a market cap of 144.58M. Regarding current trading prices, MONDF is priced at $18.53, while RTERF trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MONDF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.70, whereas RTERF's P/E ratio is 11.25. In terms of profitability, MONDF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to RTERF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MONDF and RTERF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MONDF vs ACSYF Comparison
MONDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MONDF stands at 8.18B. In comparison, ACSYF has a market cap of 124.91M. Regarding current trading prices, MONDF is priced at $18.53, while ACSYF trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MONDF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.70, whereas ACSYF's P/E ratio is -3.25. In terms of profitability, MONDF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ACSYF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MONDF is less volatile compared to ACSYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MONDF.
MONDF vs WFSTF Comparison
MONDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MONDF stands at 8.18B. In comparison, WFSTF has a market cap of 89.23M. Regarding current trading prices, MONDF is priced at $18.53, while WFSTF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MONDF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.70, whereas WFSTF's P/E ratio is -4.02. In terms of profitability, MONDF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to WFSTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MONDF and WFSTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MONDF vs GLT Comparison
MONDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MONDF stands at 8.18B. In comparison, GLT has a market cap of 73.67M. Regarding current trading prices, MONDF is priced at $18.53, while GLT trades at $21.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MONDF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.70, whereas GLT's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, MONDF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GLT's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MONDF and GLT have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MONDF vs GFELF Comparison
MONDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MONDF stands at 8.18B. In comparison, GFELF has a market cap of 71.28M. Regarding current trading prices, MONDF is priced at $18.53, while GFELF trades at $8.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MONDF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.70, whereas GFELF's P/E ratio is 7.64. In terms of profitability, MONDF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GFELF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MONDF and GFELF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MONDF vs ICLTF Comparison
MONDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MONDF stands at 8.18B. In comparison, ICLTF has a market cap of 64.42M. Regarding current trading prices, MONDF is priced at $18.53, while ICLTF trades at $2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MONDF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.70, whereas ICLTF's P/E ratio is -3.28. In terms of profitability, MONDF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ICLTF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MONDF and ICLTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MONDF vs KEWL Comparison
MONDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MONDF stands at 8.18B. In comparison, KEWL has a market cap of 41.36M. Regarding current trading prices, MONDF is priced at $18.53, while KEWL trades at $31.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MONDF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.70, whereas KEWL's P/E ratio is 0.37. In terms of profitability, MONDF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to KEWL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MONDF is less volatile compared to KEWL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MONDF.
MONDF vs CFPUF Comparison
MONDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MONDF stands at 8.18B. In comparison, CFPUF has a market cap of 35.23M. Regarding current trading prices, MONDF is priced at $18.53, while CFPUF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MONDF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.70, whereas CFPUF's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, MONDF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CFPUF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, MONDF and CFPUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MONDF vs EVA Comparison
MONDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MONDF stands at 8.18B. In comparison, EVA has a market cap of 31.27M. Regarding current trading prices, MONDF is priced at $18.53, while EVA trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MONDF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.70, whereas EVA's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, MONDF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to EVA's ROE of -6.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MONDF is less volatile compared to EVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MONDF.
MONDF vs NWGL Comparison
MONDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MONDF stands at 8.18B. In comparison, NWGL has a market cap of 22.35M. Regarding current trading prices, MONDF is priced at $18.53, while NWGL trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MONDF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.70, whereas NWGL's P/E ratio is -2.41. In terms of profitability, MONDF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NWGL's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, MONDF is less volatile compared to NWGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MONDF.
MONDF vs RUBNF Comparison
MONDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MONDF stands at 8.18B. In comparison, RUBNF has a market cap of 20.83M. Regarding current trading prices, MONDF is priced at $18.53, while RUBNF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MONDF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.70, whereas RUBNF's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, MONDF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to RUBNF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MONDF is less volatile compared to RUBNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MONDF.
MONDF vs BRGSF Comparison
MONDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MONDF stands at 8.18B. In comparison, BRGSF has a market cap of 19.76M. Regarding current trading prices, MONDF is priced at $18.53, while BRGSF trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MONDF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.70, whereas BRGSF's P/E ratio is 0.50. In terms of profitability, MONDF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BRGSF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MONDF and BRGSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MONDF vs TCOR Comparison
MONDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MONDF stands at 8.18B. In comparison, TCOR has a market cap of 17.53M. Regarding current trading prices, MONDF is priced at $18.53, while TCOR trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MONDF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.70, whereas TCOR's P/E ratio is -10.33. In terms of profitability, MONDF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TCOR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MONDF and TCOR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MONDF vs JCTCF Comparison
MONDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MONDF stands at 8.18B. In comparison, JCTCF has a market cap of 17.14M. Regarding current trading prices, MONDF is priced at $18.53, while JCTCF trades at $4.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MONDF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.70, whereas JCTCF's P/E ratio is 14.38. In terms of profitability, MONDF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to JCTCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MONDF and JCTCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MONDF vs JCTC Comparison
MONDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MONDF stands at 8.18B. In comparison, JCTC has a market cap of 13.54M. Regarding current trading prices, MONDF is priced at $18.53, while JCTC trades at $3.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MONDF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.70, whereas JCTC's P/E ratio is -10.69. In terms of profitability, MONDF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to JCTC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MONDF is less volatile compared to JCTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MONDF.
MONDF vs SUPBF Comparison
MONDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MONDF stands at 8.18B. In comparison, SUPBF has a market cap of 10.78M. Regarding current trading prices, MONDF is priced at $18.53, while SUPBF trades at $7.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MONDF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.70, whereas SUPBF's P/E ratio is -2.38. In terms of profitability, MONDF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SUPBF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MONDF and SUPBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MONDF vs CFXTF Comparison
MONDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MONDF stands at 8.18B. In comparison, CFXTF has a market cap of 8.97M. Regarding current trading prices, MONDF is priced at $18.53, while CFXTF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MONDF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.70, whereas CFXTF's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, MONDF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CFXTF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MONDF and CFXTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MONDF vs SGTM Comparison
MONDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MONDF stands at 8.18B. In comparison, SGTM has a market cap of 8.50M. Regarding current trading prices, MONDF is priced at $18.53, while SGTM trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MONDF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.70, whereas SGTM's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, MONDF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SGTM's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MONDF is less volatile compared to SGTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MONDF.
MONDF vs WBNEF Comparison
MONDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MONDF stands at 8.18B. In comparison, WBNEF has a market cap of 5.42M. Regarding current trading prices, MONDF is priced at $18.53, while WBNEF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MONDF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.70, whereas WBNEF's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, MONDF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to WBNEF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MONDF is less volatile compared to WBNEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MONDF.
MONDF vs BMSPF Comparison
MONDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MONDF stands at 8.18B. In comparison, BMSPF has a market cap of 2.62M. Regarding current trading prices, MONDF is priced at $18.53, while BMSPF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MONDF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.70, whereas BMSPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MONDF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BMSPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MONDF is less volatile compared to BMSPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MONDF.
MONDF vs ITP Comparison
MONDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MONDF stands at 8.18B. In comparison, ITP has a market cap of 2.56M. Regarding current trading prices, MONDF is priced at $18.53, while ITP trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MONDF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.70, whereas ITP's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, MONDF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ITP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MONDF is less volatile compared to ITP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MONDF.
MONDF vs HMTC Comparison
MONDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MONDF stands at 8.18B. In comparison, HMTC has a market cap of 2.05M. Regarding current trading prices, MONDF is priced at $18.53, while HMTC trades at $5.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MONDF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.70, whereas HMTC's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, MONDF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HMTC's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MONDF and HMTC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MONDF vs BSTO Comparison
MONDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MONDF stands at 8.18B. In comparison, BSTO has a market cap of 1.45M. Regarding current trading prices, MONDF is priced at $18.53, while BSTO trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MONDF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.70, whereas BSTO's P/E ratio is 5.90. In terms of profitability, MONDF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BSTO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MONDF and BSTO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MONDF vs SGMD Comparison
MONDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MONDF stands at 8.18B. In comparison, SGMD has a market cap of 18714.00. Regarding current trading prices, MONDF is priced at $18.53, while SGMD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MONDF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.70, whereas SGMD's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MONDF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SGMD's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, MONDF and SGMD have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MONDF vs EXRG Comparison
MONDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MONDF stands at 8.18B. In comparison, EXRG has a market cap of 5710.00. Regarding current trading prices, MONDF is priced at $18.53, while EXRG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MONDF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.70, whereas EXRG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MONDF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to EXRG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MONDF is less volatile compared to EXRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MONDF.
MONDF vs ZMGD Comparison
MONDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MONDF stands at 8.18B. In comparison, ZMGD has a market cap of 5228.00. Regarding current trading prices, MONDF is priced at $18.53, while ZMGD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MONDF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.70, whereas ZMGD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MONDF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ZMGD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MONDF is less volatile compared to ZMGD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MONDF.
MONDF vs BPMI Comparison
MONDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MONDF stands at 8.18B. In comparison, BPMI has a market cap of 617.00. Regarding current trading prices, MONDF is priced at $18.53, while BPMI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MONDF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.70, whereas BPMI's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MONDF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BPMI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MONDF and BPMI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MONDF vs NP Comparison
MONDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MONDF stands at 8.18B. In comparison, NP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MONDF is priced at $18.53, while NP trades at $31.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MONDF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.70, whereas NP's P/E ratio is -19.25. In terms of profitability, MONDF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NP's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MONDF is less volatile compared to NP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MONDF.
MONDF vs VRDSF Comparison
MONDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MONDF stands at 8.18B. In comparison, VRDSF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MONDF is priced at $18.53, while VRDSF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MONDF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.70, whereas VRDSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MONDF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to VRDSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MONDF and VRDSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MONDF vs KPCM Comparison
MONDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MONDF stands at 8.18B. In comparison, KPCM comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MONDF is priced at $18.53, while KPCM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MONDF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.70, whereas KPCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MONDF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to KPCM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MONDF and KPCM have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MONDF vs VRS Comparison
MONDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MONDF stands at 8.18B. In comparison, VRS comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MONDF is priced at $18.53, while VRS trades at $26.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MONDF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.70, whereas VRS's P/E ratio is -278.25. In terms of profitability, MONDF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to VRS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MONDF is less volatile compared to VRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MONDF.
MONDF vs UFS Comparison
MONDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MONDF stands at 8.18B. In comparison, UFS comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MONDF is priced at $18.53, while UFS trades at $55.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MONDF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.70, whereas UFS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MONDF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to UFS's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MONDF is less volatile compared to UFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MONDF.
MONDF vs HAIPF Comparison
MONDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MONDF stands at 8.18B. In comparison, HAIPF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MONDF is priced at $18.53, while HAIPF trades at $101.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MONDF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.70, whereas HAIPF's P/E ratio is 17.58. In terms of profitability, MONDF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HAIPF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MONDF and HAIPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
Peer Comparison Table: Paper, Lumber & Forest Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KLBAY | $6.69 | +2.92% | 20.34B | 60.82 | $0.11 | +1.15% |
UPMMY | $26.42 | +0.25% | 14.09B | 29.69 | $0.89 | +6.54% |
UPMKF | $25.80 | -15.55% | 13.76B | 39.69 | $0.65 | +6.29% |
SUZ | $8.86 | -1.28% | 10.97B | -9.42 | -$0.94 | +3.05% |
SCABY | $14.35 | +9.92% | 9.17B | 26.56 | $0.54 | +2.05% |
SVCBF | $12.55 | -7.87% | 8.81B | 23.24 | $0.54 | +2.36% |
MONDF | $18.53 | +5.14% | 8.18B | 9.70 | $1.91 | N/A |
SEOAY | $9.23 | -0.86% | 7.50B | -61.53 | -$0.15 | +2.35% |
SEOJF | $8.56 | -37.24% | 6.96B | -57.07 | -$0.15 | +2.60% |
MONDY | $30.65 | +2.30% | 6.79B | 27.61 | $1.11 | +6.14% |