Mineros S.A.
Mineros S.A. (MNSAF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MNSAF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MNSAF | $2.14 | +5.01% | 610.8M | 4.63 | $0.44 | +4.91% |
| ZIJMF | $2.87 | -7.42% | 79.1B | 15.74 | $0.19 | +1.77% |
| OPYGY | $21.00 | +0.00% | 28.4B | 2.50 | $8.39 | +727.35% |
| GFIOF | $31.05 | +3.50% | 27.8B | 22.50 | $1.38 | +1.76% |
| NESRF | $12.22 | +1.92% | 17.4B | 16.92 | $0.72 | +2.68% |
| NSTYY | $12.40 | +0.00% | 14.3B | 33.51 | $0.37 | +1.44% |
| NCMGY | $15.59 | +2.84% | 13.9B | 17.92 | $0.87 | N/A |
| LUGDF | $57.28 | +0.93% | 13.8B | 22.57 | $2.54 | +2.72% |
| NCMGF | $15.20 | -2.53% | 13.6B | 17.47 | $0.87 | N/A |
| CAHPF | $5.39 | -2.53% | 10.8B | 17.97 | $0.30 | +1.45% |
Stock Comparison
MNSAF vs ZIJMF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, ZIJMF has a market cap of 79.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while ZIJMF trades at $2.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas ZIJMF's P/E ratio is 15.74. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ZIJMF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to ZIJMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.Check ZIJMF's competition here
MNSAF vs OPYGY Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, OPYGY has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while OPYGY trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas OPYGY's P/E ratio is 2.50. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to OPYGY's ROE of +1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF and OPYGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OPYGY's competition here
MNSAF vs GFIOF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, GFIOF has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while GFIOF trades at $31.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas GFIOF's P/E ratio is 22.50. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to GFIOF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to GFIOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.Check GFIOF's competition here
MNSAF vs NESRF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, NESRF has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while NESRF trades at $12.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas NESRF's P/E ratio is 16.92. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to NESRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to NESRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.Check NESRF's competition here
MNSAF vs NSTYY Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, NSTYY has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while NSTYY trades at $12.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas NSTYY's P/E ratio is 33.51. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to NSTYY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF and NSTYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NSTYY's competition here
MNSAF vs NCMGY Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, NCMGY has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while NCMGY trades at $15.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas NCMGY's P/E ratio is 17.92. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to NCMGY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to NCMGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.Check NCMGY's competition here
MNSAF vs LUGDF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, LUGDF has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while LUGDF trades at $57.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas LUGDF's P/E ratio is 22.57. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to LUGDF's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to LUGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.Check LUGDF's competition here
MNSAF vs NCMGF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, NCMGF has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while NCMGF trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas NCMGF's P/E ratio is 17.47. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to NCMGF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to NCMGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.Check NCMGF's competition here
MNSAF vs CAHPF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, CAHPF has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while CAHPF trades at $5.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas CAHPF's P/E ratio is 17.97. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CAHPF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to CAHPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.Check CAHPF's competition here
MNSAF vs HGMCF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, HGMCF has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while HGMCF trades at $15.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas HGMCF's P/E ratio is 16.97. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to HGMCF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF and HGMCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HGMCF's competition here
MNSAF vs ZHAOF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, ZHAOF has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while ZHAOF trades at $2.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas ZHAOF's P/E ratio is 56.60. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ZHAOF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to ZHAOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.Check ZHAOF's competition here
MNSAF vs EDVMF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, EDVMF has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while EDVMF trades at $34.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas EDVMF's P/E ratio is 37.44. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to EDVMF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to EDVMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.Check EDVMF's competition here
MNSAF vs AULGF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, AULGF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while AULGF trades at $15.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas AULGF's P/E ratio is 159.00. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to AULGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF and AULGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AULGF's competition here
MNSAF vs SBYSF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, SBYSF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while SBYSF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas SBYSF's P/E ratio is -13.33. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SBYSF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to SBYSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.Check SBYSF's competition here
MNSAF vs ARGTF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, ARGTF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while ARGTF trades at $20.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas ARGTF's P/E ratio is 78.46. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ARGTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to ARGTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.Check ARGTF's competition here
MNSAF vs ZIJMY Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, ZIJMY has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while ZIJMY trades at $60.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas ZIJMY's P/E ratio is 16.24. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ZIJMY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to ZIJMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.Check ZIJMY's competition here
MNSAF vs OCANF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, OCANF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while OCANF trades at $17.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas OCANF's P/E ratio is 10.85. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to OCANF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to OCANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.Check OCANF's competition here
MNSAF vs RMLRF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, RMLRF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while RMLRF trades at $2.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas RMLRF's P/E ratio is 10.55. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to RMLRF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to RMLRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.Check RMLRF's competition here
MNSAF vs DGMLF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, DGMLF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while DGMLF trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas DGMLF's P/E ratio is -154.50. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to DGMLF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to DGMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.Check DGMLF's competition here
MNSAF vs LECBF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, LECBF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while LECBF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas LECBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to LECBF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to LECBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.Check LECBF's competition here
MNSAF vs PMNXF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, PMNXF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while PMNXF trades at $2.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas PMNXF's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to PMNXF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to PMNXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.Check PMNXF's competition here
MNSAF vs DPMLF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, DPMLF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while DPMLF trades at $18.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas DPMLF's P/E ratio is 13.12. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to DPMLF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to DPMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.Check DPMLF's competition here
MNSAF vs GSISF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, GSISF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while GSISF trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas GSISF's P/E ratio is 20.73. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to GSISF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF and GSISF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GSISF's competition here
MNSAF vs GRLGF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, GRLGF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while GRLGF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas GRLGF's P/E ratio is -22.50. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to GRLGF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to GRLGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.Check GRLGF's competition here
MNSAF vs CRNLF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, CRNLF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while CRNLF trades at $6.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas CRNLF's P/E ratio is 50.85. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CRNLF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF and CRNLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CRNLF's competition here
MNSAF vs TORXF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, TORXF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while TORXF trades at $30.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas TORXF's P/E ratio is 12.66. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to TORXF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to TORXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.Check TORXF's competition here
MNSAF vs KNTNF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, KNTNF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while KNTNF trades at $10.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas KNTNF's P/E ratio is 12.53. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to KNTNF's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to KNTNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.Check KNTNF's competition here
MNSAF vs ELKMF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, ELKMF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while ELKMF trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas ELKMF's P/E ratio is 26.25. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ELKMF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to ELKMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.Check ELKMF's competition here
MNSAF vs CELTF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, CELTF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while CELTF trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas CELTF's P/E ratio is 26.86. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CELTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF and CELTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CELTF's competition here
MNSAF vs REDLF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, REDLF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while REDLF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas REDLF's P/E ratio is 16.25. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to REDLF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to REDLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.Check REDLF's competition here
MNSAF vs HCHDF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, HCHDF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while HCHDF trades at $4.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas HCHDF's P/E ratio is 21.42. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to HCHDF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to HCHDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.Check HCHDF's competition here
MNSAF vs RGRNF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, RGRNF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while RGRNF trades at $2.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas RGRNF's P/E ratio is -277.00. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to RGRNF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to RGRNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.Check RGRNF's competition here
MNSAF vs ORAAF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, ORAAF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while ORAAF trades at $24.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas ORAAF's P/E ratio is -18.74. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ORAAF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to ORAAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.Check ORAAF's competition here
MNSAF vs KOZAY Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, KOZAY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while KOZAY trades at $6.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas KOZAY's P/E ratio is 12.15. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to KOZAY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to KOZAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.Check KOZAY's competition here
MNSAF vs WFRSF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, WFRSF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while WFRSF trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas WFRSF's P/E ratio is 13.12. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to WFRSF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to WFRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.Check WFRSF's competition here
MNSAF vs WDOFF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, WDOFF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while WDOFF trades at $12.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas WDOFF's P/E ratio is 10.75. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to WDOFF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to WDOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.Check WDOFF's competition here
MNSAF vs CXBMF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, CXBMF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while CXBMF trades at $2.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas CXBMF's P/E ratio is 31.00. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CXBMF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to CXBMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.Check CXBMF's competition here
MNSAF vs EOGSF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, EOGSF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while EOGSF trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas EOGSF's P/E ratio is 25.50. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to EOGSF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to EOGSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.Check EOGSF's competition here
MNSAF vs MAUTF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, MAUTF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while MAUTF trades at $3.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas MAUTF's P/E ratio is -16.78. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to MAUTF's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to MAUTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.Check MAUTF's competition here
MNSAF vs OBNNF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, OBNNF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while OBNNF trades at $3.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas OBNNF's P/E ratio is -351.00. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to OBNNF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to OBNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.Check OBNNF's competition here
MNSAF vs PAFRF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, PAFRF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while PAFRF trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas PAFRF's P/E ratio is 15.21. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to PAFRF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to PAFRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.Check PAFRF's competition here
MNSAF vs DRDGF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, DRDGF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while DRDGF trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas DRDGF's P/E ratio is 12.55. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to DRDGF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to DRDGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.Check DRDGF's competition here
MNSAF vs SNWGF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, SNWGF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while SNWGF trades at $6.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas SNWGF's P/E ratio is -45.13. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SNWGF's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to SNWGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.Check SNWGF's competition here
MNSAF vs AURQF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, AURQF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while AURQF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas AURQF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to AURQF's ROE of -2.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF and AURQF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AURQF's competition here
MNSAF vs RMGGY Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, RMGGY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while RMGGY trades at $5.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas RMGGY's P/E ratio is -33.47. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to RMGGY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to RMGGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.Check RMGGY's competition here
MNSAF vs RMGGF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, RMGGF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while RMGGF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas RMGGF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to RMGGF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to RMGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.Check RMGGF's competition here
MNSAF vs MWSNF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, MWSNF has a market cap of 973.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while MWSNF trades at $3.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas MWSNF's P/E ratio is -78.20. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to MWSNF's ROE of -17.66%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to MWSNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.Check MWSNF's competition here
MNSAF vs HCHDY Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, HCHDY has a market cap of 930.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while HCHDY trades at $27.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas HCHDY's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to HCHDY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF and HCHDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HCHDY's competition here
MNSAF vs SVLKF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, SVLKF has a market cap of 927.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while SVLKF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas SVLKF's P/E ratio is 13.86. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SVLKF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF and SVLKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SVLKF's competition here
MNSAF vs SGSVF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, SGSVF has a market cap of 880.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while SGSVF trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas SGSVF's P/E ratio is -79.00. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SGSVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to SGSVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.Check SGSVF's competition here
MNSAF vs RUPRF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, RUPRF has a market cap of 872.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while RUPRF trades at $3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas RUPRF's P/E ratio is -186.17. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to RUPRF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to RUPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.Check RUPRF's competition here
MNSAF vs BELGF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, BELGF has a market cap of 869.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while BELGF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas BELGF's P/E ratio is 11.76. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to BELGF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to BELGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.Check BELGF's competition here
MNSAF vs KRRGF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, KRRGF has a market cap of 862.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while KRRGF trades at $4.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas KRRGF's P/E ratio is 80.50. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to KRRGF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to KRRGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.Check KRRGF's competition here
MNSAF vs ALKEF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, ALKEF has a market cap of 813.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while ALKEF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas ALKEF's P/E ratio is 29.80. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ALKEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to ALKEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.Check ALKEF's competition here
MNSAF vs PDIYF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, PDIYF has a market cap of 780.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while PDIYF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas PDIYF's P/E ratio is -29.75. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to PDIYF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to PDIYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.Check PDIYF's competition here
MNSAF vs WTGRF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, WTGRF has a market cap of 677.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while WTGRF trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas WTGRF's P/E ratio is 143.00. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to WTGRF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to WTGRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.Check WTGRF's competition here
MNSAF vs RGDFF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, RGDFF has a market cap of 676.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while RGDFF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas RGDFF's P/E ratio is -13.61. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to RGDFF's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to RGDFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.Check RGDFF's competition here
MNSAF vs ASGOF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, ASGOF has a market cap of 578.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while ASGOF trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas ASGOF's P/E ratio is -8.24. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ASGOF's ROE of -20.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF and ASGOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ASGOF's competition here
MNSAF vs RMLFF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, RMLFF has a market cap of 564.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while RMLFF trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas RMLFF's P/E ratio is -11.31. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to RMLFF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to RMLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.Check RMLFF's competition here
MNSAF vs GUYGF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, GUYGF has a market cap of 550.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while GUYGF trades at $2.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas GUYGF's P/E ratio is -76.10. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to GUYGF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to GUYGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.Check GUYGF's competition here
MNSAF vs ORZCF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, ORZCF has a market cap of 534.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while ORZCF trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas ORZCF's P/E ratio is 6.39. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ORZCF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to ORZCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.Check ORZCF's competition here
MNSAF vs NVMLF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, NVMLF has a market cap of 512.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while NVMLF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas NVMLF's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to NVMLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to NVMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.Check NVMLF's competition here
MNSAF vs RIOFF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, RIOFF has a market cap of 489.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while RIOFF trades at $1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas RIOFF's P/E ratio is 115.00. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to RIOFF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to RIOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.Check RIOFF's competition here
MNSAF vs OSKA Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, OSKA has a market cap of 483.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while OSKA trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas OSKA's P/E ratio is -16.67. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to OSKA's ROE of -88.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to OSKA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.Check OSKA's competition here
MNSAF vs KSKGF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, KSKGF has a market cap of 474.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while KSKGF trades at $1.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas KSKGF's P/E ratio is 3.41. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to KSKGF's ROE of +0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to KSKGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.Check KSKGF's competition here
MNSAF vs ARNGF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, ARNGF has a market cap of 468.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while ARNGF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas ARNGF's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ARNGF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to ARNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.Check ARNGF's competition here
MNSAF vs ECRTF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, ECRTF has a market cap of 466.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while ECRTF trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas ECRTF's P/E ratio is -9.87. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ECRTF's ROE of -3.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to ECRTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.Check ECRTF's competition here
MNSAF vs RSRBF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, RSRBF has a market cap of 459.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while RSRBF trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas RSRBF's P/E ratio is -23.70. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to RSRBF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to RSRBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.Check RSRBF's competition here
MNSAF vs THXPF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, THXPF has a market cap of 445.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while THXPF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas THXPF's P/E ratio is 3.19. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to THXPF's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to THXPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.Check THXPF's competition here
MNSAF vs LMGDF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, LMGDF has a market cap of 384.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while LMGDF trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas LMGDF's P/E ratio is -7.07. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to LMGDF's ROE of +1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to LMGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.Check LMGDF's competition here
MNSAF vs OMGGF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, OMGGF has a market cap of 376.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while OMGGF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas OMGGF's P/E ratio is -31.59. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to OMGGF's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to OMGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.Check OMGGF's competition here
MNSAF vs MNDJF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, MNDJF has a market cap of 371.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while MNDJF trades at $3.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas MNDJF's P/E ratio is 6.65. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to MNDJF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to MNDJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.Check MNDJF's competition here
MNSAF vs ELEMF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, ELEMF has a market cap of 371.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while ELEMF trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas ELEMF's P/E ratio is 50.33. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ELEMF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to ELEMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.Check ELEMF's competition here
MNSAF vs MAKOF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, MAKOF has a market cap of 351.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while MAKOF trades at $4.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas MAKOF's P/E ratio is 14.62. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to MAKOF's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to MAKOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.Check MAKOF's competition here
MNSAF vs PROBF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, PROBF has a market cap of 348.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while PROBF trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas PROBF's P/E ratio is -21.35. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to PROBF's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to PROBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.Check PROBF's competition here
MNSAF vs TPRXF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, TPRXF has a market cap of 343.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while TPRXF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas TPRXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to TPRXF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to TPRXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.Check TPRXF's competition here
MNSAF vs GDRZF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, GDRZF has a market cap of 313.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while GDRZF trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas GDRZF's P/E ratio is -13.19. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to GDRZF's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to GDRZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.Check GDRZF's competition here
MNSAF vs OGNRF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, OGNRF has a market cap of 289.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while OGNRF trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas OGNRF's P/E ratio is 143.30. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to OGNRF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to OGNRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.Check OGNRF's competition here
MNSAF vs AGXKF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, AGXKF has a market cap of 285.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while AGXKF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas AGXKF's P/E ratio is -16.67. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to AGXKF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to AGXKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.Check AGXKF's competition here
MNSAF vs MGDPF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, MGDPF has a market cap of 278.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while MGDPF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas MGDPF's P/E ratio is -19.80. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to MGDPF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to MGDPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.Check MGDPF's competition here
MNSAF vs FDMIF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, FDMIF has a market cap of 268.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while FDMIF trades at $2.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas FDMIF's P/E ratio is -65.75. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to FDMIF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to FDMIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.Check FDMIF's competition here
MNSAF vs JAGGF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, JAGGF has a market cap of 264.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while JAGGF trades at $3.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas JAGGF's P/E ratio is -10.09. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to JAGGF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to JAGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.Check JAGGF's competition here
MNSAF vs STPGF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, STPGF has a market cap of 263.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while STPGF trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas STPGF's P/E ratio is 8.01. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to STPGF's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to STPGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.Check STPGF's competition here
MNSAF vs OSIIF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, OSIIF has a market cap of 254.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while OSIIF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas OSIIF's P/E ratio is -5.83. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to OSIIF's ROE of +2.70%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF and OSIIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OSIIF's competition here
MNSAF vs ERRSF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, ERRSF has a market cap of 250.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while ERRSF trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas ERRSF's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ERRSF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to ERRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.Check ERRSF's competition here
MNSAF vs HSTXF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, HSTXF has a market cap of 238.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while HSTXF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas HSTXF's P/E ratio is 10.57. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to HSTXF's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to HSTXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.Check HSTXF's competition here
MNSAF vs GGAZF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, GGAZF has a market cap of 235.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while GGAZF trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas GGAZF's P/E ratio is -8.22. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to GGAZF's ROE of +1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to GGAZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.Check GGAZF's competition here
MNSAF vs WRLGF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, WRLGF has a market cap of 233.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while WRLGF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas WRLGF's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to WRLGF's ROE of -1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to WRLGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.Check WRLGF's competition here
MNSAF vs THSGF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, THSGF has a market cap of 210.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while THSGF trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas THSGF's P/E ratio is -81.87. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to THSGF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to THSGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.Check THSGF's competition here
MNSAF vs SITKF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, SITKF has a market cap of 204.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while SITKF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas SITKF's P/E ratio is -55.00. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SITKF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to SITKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.Check SITKF's competition here
MNSAF vs SRBIF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, SRBIF has a market cap of 201.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while SRBIF trades at $2.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas SRBIF's P/E ratio is 6.06. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SRBIF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to SRBIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.Check SRBIF's competition here
MNSAF vs AMXEF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, AMXEF has a market cap of 201M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while AMXEF trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas AMXEF's P/E ratio is -82.10. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to AMXEF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to AMXEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.Check AMXEF's competition here
MNSAF vs TGMGF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, TGMGF has a market cap of 199.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while TGMGF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas TGMGF's P/E ratio is -10.65. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to TGMGF's ROE of -7.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to TGMGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.Check TGMGF's competition here
MNSAF vs SAAGF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, SAAGF has a market cap of 193.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while SAAGF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas SAAGF's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SAAGF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF and SAAGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SAAGF's competition here
MNSAF vs CNLMF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, CNLMF has a market cap of 193.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while CNLMF trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas CNLMF's P/E ratio is -8.59. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CNLMF's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to CNLMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.Check CNLMF's competition here
MNSAF vs STBMF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, STBMF has a market cap of 184.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while STBMF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas STBMF's P/E ratio is -4.25. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to STBMF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to STBMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.Check STBMF's competition here
MNSAF vs DCCNF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, DCCNF has a market cap of 182.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while DCCNF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas DCCNF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to DCCNF's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF and DCCNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DCCNF's competition here
MNSAF vs CNMXF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, CNMXF has a market cap of 178.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while CNMXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas CNMXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CNMXF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to CNMXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.Check CNMXF's competition here
MNSAF vs FFMGF Comparison August 2025
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 610.8M. In comparison, FFMGF has a market cap of 161.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $2.14, while FFMGF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.63, whereas FFMGF's P/E ratio is -12.61. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to FFMGF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to FFMGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.Check FFMGF's competition here