Mineros S.A.
Mineros S.A. MNSAF Peers
See (MNSAF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MNSAF | $1.76 | N/A | 528.3M | 4.90 | $0.36 | +3.91% |
| ZIJMF | $2.38 | -2.86% | 67.3B | 12.53 | $0.19 | +2.22% |
| OPYGY | $21.00 | N/A | 28.4B | 2.50 | $8.39 | +0.37% |
| GFIOF | $24.03 | +5.63% | 21.5B | 17.41 | $1.38 | +2.27% |
| NESRF | $13.51 | -0.30% | 19.3B | 25.49 | $0.53 | +1.55% |
| NSTYY | $12.40 | +25.38% | 14.3B | 33.51 | $0.37 | +1.41% |
| HCHDY | $27.14 | N/A | 14B | 12.92 | $2.10 | N/A |
| NCMGY | $15.59 | +2.84% | 13.9B | 17.92 | $0.87 | N/A |
| NCMGF | $15.20 | -2.53% | 13.6B | 17.47 | $0.87 | N/A |
| LUGDF | $51.90 | +3.78% | 12.5B | 23.38 | $2.22 | +2.34% |
Stock Comparison
MNSAF vs ZIJMF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, ZIJMF has a market cap of 67.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while ZIJMF trades at $2.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas ZIJMF's P/E ratio is 12.53. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ZIJMF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is more volatile compared to ZIJMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs OPYGY Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, OPYGY has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while OPYGY trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas OPYGY's P/E ratio is 2.50. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to OPYGY's ROE of +3.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is more volatile compared to OPYGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs GFIOF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, GFIOF has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while GFIOF trades at $24.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas GFIOF's P/E ratio is 17.41. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GFIOF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is more volatile compared to GFIOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs NESRF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, NESRF has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while NESRF trades at $13.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas NESRF's P/E ratio is 25.49. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NESRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is more volatile compared to NESRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs NSTYY Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, NSTYY has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while NSTYY trades at $12.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas NSTYY's P/E ratio is 33.51. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NSTYY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is more volatile compared to NSTYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs HCHDY Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, HCHDY has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while HCHDY trades at $27.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas HCHDY's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HCHDY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is more volatile compared to HCHDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs NCMGY Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, NCMGY has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while NCMGY trades at $15.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas NCMGY's P/E ratio is 17.92. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NCMGY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to NCMGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs NCMGF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, NCMGF has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while NCMGF trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas NCMGF's P/E ratio is 17.47. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NCMGF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to NCMGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs LUGDF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, LUGDF has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while LUGDF trades at $51.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas LUGDF's P/E ratio is 23.38. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LUGDF's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is more volatile compared to LUGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs CAHPF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, CAHPF has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while CAHPF trades at $6.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas CAHPF's P/E ratio is 26.43. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CAHPF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to CAHPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs KOZAY Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, KOZAY has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while KOZAY trades at $3.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas KOZAY's P/E ratio is 6.96. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KOZAY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to KOZAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs HGMCF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, HGMCF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while HGMCF trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas HGMCF's P/E ratio is 16.34. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HGMCF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is more volatile compared to HGMCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs ZHAOF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, ZHAOF has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while ZHAOF trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas ZHAOF's P/E ratio is 45.00. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ZHAOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to ZHAOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs EDVMF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, EDVMF has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while EDVMF trades at $32.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas EDVMF's P/E ratio is -76.70. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to EDVMF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is more volatile compared to EDVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs AULGF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, AULGF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while AULGF trades at $15.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas AULGF's P/E ratio is 159.00. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AULGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is more volatile compared to AULGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs SBYSF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, SBYSF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while SBYSF trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas SBYSF's P/E ratio is -11.43. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SBYSF's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is more volatile compared to SBYSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs ARGTF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, ARGTF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while ARGTF trades at $18.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas ARGTF's P/E ratio is -269.86. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ARGTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to ARGTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs DGMLF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, DGMLF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while DGMLF trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas DGMLF's P/E ratio is -154.50. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DGMLF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to DGMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs PMNXF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, PMNXF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while PMNXF trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas PMNXF's P/E ratio is 9.79. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PMNXF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is more volatile compared to PMNXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs OCANF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, OCANF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while OCANF trades at $4.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas OCANF's P/E ratio is 11.80. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to OCANF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to OCANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs ZIJMY Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, ZIJMY has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while ZIJMY trades at $45.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas ZIJMY's P/E ratio is 12.35. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ZIJMY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is more volatile compared to ZIJMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs TORXF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, TORXF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while TORXF trades at $34.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas TORXF's P/E ratio is 22.79. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TORXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to TORXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs KNTNF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, KNTNF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while KNTNF trades at $11.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas KNTNF's P/E ratio is 15.58. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KNTNF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to KNTNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs GRLGF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, GRLGF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while GRLGF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas GRLGF's P/E ratio is -20.84. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GRLGF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to GRLGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs DPMLF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, DPMLF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while DPMLF trades at $16.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas DPMLF's P/E ratio is 12.20. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DPMLF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to DPMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs ELKMF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, ELKMF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while ELKMF trades at $2.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas ELKMF's P/E ratio is 30.75. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ELKMF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is more volatile compared to ELKMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs CRNLF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, CRNLF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while CRNLF trades at $6.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas CRNLF's P/E ratio is 46.68. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CRNLF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to CRNLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs RGRNF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, RGRNF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while RGRNF trades at $3.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas RGRNF's P/E ratio is -341.68. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to RGRNF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is more volatile compared to RGRNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs GSISF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, GSISF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while GSISF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas GSISF's P/E ratio is 28.57. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GSISF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is more volatile compared to GSISF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs RMLRF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, RMLRF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while RMLRF trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas RMLRF's P/E ratio is 10.11. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to RMLRF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to RMLRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs CELTF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, CELTF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while CELTF trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas CELTF's P/E ratio is 26.86. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CELTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is more volatile compared to CELTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs CXBMF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, CXBMF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while CXBMF trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas CXBMF's P/E ratio is 36.29. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CXBMF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to CXBMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs WDOFF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, WDOFF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while WDOFF trades at $14.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas WDOFF's P/E ratio is 15.89. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to WDOFF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to WDOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs HCHDF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, HCHDF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while HCHDF trades at $4.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas HCHDF's P/E ratio is 21.82. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HCHDF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to HCHDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs REDLF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, REDLF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while REDLF trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas REDLF's P/E ratio is 30.85. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to REDLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to REDLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs WFRSF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, WFRSF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while WFRSF trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas WFRSF's P/E ratio is 13.08. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to WFRSF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to WFRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs ORAAF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, ORAAF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while ORAAF trades at $25.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas ORAAF's P/E ratio is -19.70. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ORAAF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is more volatile compared to ORAAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs EOGSF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, EOGSF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while EOGSF trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas EOGSF's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to EOGSF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to EOGSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs DRDGF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, DRDGF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while DRDGF trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas DRDGF's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DRDGF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to DRDGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs OBNNF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, OBNNF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while OBNNF trades at $3.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas OBNNF's P/E ratio is -351.00. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to OBNNF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is more volatile compared to OBNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs PAFRF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, PAFRF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while PAFRF trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas PAFRF's P/E ratio is 15.21. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PAFRF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to PAFRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs MAUTF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, MAUTF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while MAUTF trades at $3.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas MAUTF's P/E ratio is -15.32. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MAUTF's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to MAUTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs MWSNF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, MWSNF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while MWSNF trades at $4.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas MWSNF's P/E ratio is -89.28. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MWSNF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is more volatile compared to MWSNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs AURQF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, AURQF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while AURQF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas AURQF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AURQF's ROE of -2.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is more volatile compared to AURQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs RUPRF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, RUPRF has a market cap of 971.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while RUPRF trades at $4.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas RUPRF's P/E ratio is -207.50. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to RUPRF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to RUPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs BELGF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, BELGF has a market cap of 944.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while BELGF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas BELGF's P/E ratio is 12.80. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BELGF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to BELGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs SVLKF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, SVLKF has a market cap of 927.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while SVLKF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas SVLKF's P/E ratio is 13.86. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SVLKF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is more volatile compared to SVLKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs SNWGF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, SNWGF has a market cap of 918.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while SNWGF trades at $5.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas SNWGF's P/E ratio is -40.86. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SNWGF's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to SNWGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs RMGGF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, RMGGF has a market cap of 915.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while RMGGF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas RMGGF's P/E ratio is -43.00. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to RMGGF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is more volatile compared to RMGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs SGSVF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, SGSVF has a market cap of 880.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while SGSVF trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas SGSVF's P/E ratio is -79.00. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SGSVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is more volatile compared to SGSVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs KRRGF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, KRRGF has a market cap of 862.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while KRRGF trades at $4.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas KRRGF's P/E ratio is 80.50. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KRRGF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to KRRGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs PDIYF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, PDIYF has a market cap of 733.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while PDIYF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas PDIYF's P/E ratio is -28.00. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PDIYF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to PDIYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs WTGRF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, WTGRF has a market cap of 677.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while WTGRF trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas WTGRF's P/E ratio is 143.00. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to WTGRF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is more volatile compared to WTGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs RGDFF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, RGDFF has a market cap of 676.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while RGDFF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas RGDFF's P/E ratio is -13.61. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to RGDFF's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to RGDFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs ORZCF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, ORZCF has a market cap of 557.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while ORZCF trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas ORZCF's P/E ratio is 8.08. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ORZCF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to ORZCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs GUYGF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, GUYGF has a market cap of 543.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while GUYGF trades at $2.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas GUYGF's P/E ratio is -75.33. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GUYGF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to GUYGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs NVMLF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, NVMLF has a market cap of 512.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while NVMLF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas NVMLF's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NVMLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to NVMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs ASGOF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, ASGOF has a market cap of 503.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while ASGOF trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas ASGOF's P/E ratio is -6.28. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ASGOF's ROE of -22.71%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is more volatile compared to ASGOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs ECRTF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, ECRTF has a market cap of 488.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while ECRTF trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas ECRTF's P/E ratio is -9.72. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ECRTF's ROE of -6.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is more volatile compared to ECRTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs RSRBF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, RSRBF has a market cap of 484.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while RSRBF trades at $2.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas RSRBF's P/E ratio is 83.67. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to RSRBF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is more volatile compared to RSRBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs ARNGF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, ARNGF has a market cap of 468.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while ARNGF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas ARNGF's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ARNGF's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to ARNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs RMLFF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, RMLFF has a market cap of 425.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while RMLFF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas RMLFF's P/E ratio is -9.86. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to RMLFF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is more volatile compared to RMLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs RIOFF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, RIOFF has a market cap of 391.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while RIOFF trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas RIOFF's P/E ratio is 92.21. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to RIOFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to RIOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs PROBF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, PROBF has a market cap of 385.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while PROBF trades at $1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas PROBF's P/E ratio is -15.75. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PROBF's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to PROBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs LMGDF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, LMGDF has a market cap of 378.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while LMGDF trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas LMGDF's P/E ratio is -6.97. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LMGDF's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is more volatile compared to LMGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs MNDJF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, MNDJF has a market cap of 365.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while MNDJF trades at $3.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas MNDJF's P/E ratio is 6.54. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MNDJF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is more volatile compared to MNDJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs THXPF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, THXPF has a market cap of 356.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while THXPF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas THXPF's P/E ratio is 3.19. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to THXPF's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to THXPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs KSKGF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, KSKGF has a market cap of 344.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while KSKGF trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas KSKGF's P/E ratio is 2.47. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KSKGF's ROE of +1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to KSKGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs TPRXF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, TPRXF has a market cap of 343.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while TPRXF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas TPRXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TPRXF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to TPRXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs FDMIF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, FDMIF has a market cap of 305.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while FDMIF trades at $3.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas FDMIF's P/E ratio is -35.67. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FDMIF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is more volatile compared to FDMIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs MAKOF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, MAKOF has a market cap of 304.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while MAKOF trades at $3.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas MAKOF's P/E ratio is 12.73. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MAKOF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to MAKOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs ALKEF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, ALKEF has a market cap of 302.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while ALKEF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas ALKEF's P/E ratio is 24.97. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ALKEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is more volatile compared to ALKEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs OGNRF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, OGNRF has a market cap of 290.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while OGNRF trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas OGNRF's P/E ratio is 143.80. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to OGNRF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is more volatile compared to OGNRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs MGDPF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, MGDPF has a market cap of 278.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while MGDPF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas MGDPF's P/E ratio is -19.80. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MGDPF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to MGDPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs STPGF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, STPGF has a market cap of 267.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while STPGF trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas STPGF's P/E ratio is 5.56. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to STPGF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to STPGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs ELEMF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, ELEMF has a market cap of 258.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while ELEMF trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas ELEMF's P/E ratio is 52.50. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ELEMF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is more volatile compared to ELEMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs OMGGF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, OMGGF has a market cap of 255.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while OMGGF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas OMGGF's P/E ratio is -20.83. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to OMGGF's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to OMGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs OSIIF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, OSIIF has a market cap of 254.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while OSIIF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas OSIIF's P/E ratio is -5.83. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to OSIIF's ROE of +4.74%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is more volatile compared to OSIIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs ERRSF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, ERRSF has a market cap of 250.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while ERRSF trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas ERRSF's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ERRSF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to ERRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs JAGGF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, JAGGF has a market cap of 242.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while JAGGF trades at $3.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas JAGGF's P/E ratio is -38.25. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to JAGGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to JAGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs HSTXF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, HSTXF has a market cap of 241.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while HSTXF trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas HSTXF's P/E ratio is 3.87. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HSTXF's ROE of +1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to HSTXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs WRLGF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, WRLGF has a market cap of 236.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while WRLGF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas WRLGF's P/E ratio is -2.44. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to WRLGF's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to WRLGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs STBMF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, STBMF has a market cap of 227.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while STBMF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas STBMF's P/E ratio is -4.20. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to STBMF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is more volatile compared to STBMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs GDRZF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, GDRZF has a market cap of 220.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while GDRZF trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas GDRZF's P/E ratio is -19.50. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GDRZF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is more volatile compared to GDRZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs THSGF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, THSGF has a market cap of 208.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while THSGF trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas THSGF's P/E ratio is 43.90. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to THSGF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is more volatile compared to THSGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs SRBIF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, SRBIF has a market cap of 201.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while SRBIF trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas SRBIF's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SRBIF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is more volatile compared to SRBIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs AGXKF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, AGXKF has a market cap of 196.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while AGXKF trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas AGXKF's P/E ratio is -11.47. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AGXKF's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is more volatile compared to AGXKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs SAAGF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, SAAGF has a market cap of 193.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while SAAGF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas SAAGF's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SAAGF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is more volatile compared to SAAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs CNLMF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, CNLMF has a market cap of 193.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while CNLMF trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas CNLMF's P/E ratio is -8.59. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CNLMF's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is more volatile compared to CNLMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs DCCNF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, DCCNF has a market cap of 182.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while DCCNF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas DCCNF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DCCNF's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is more volatile compared to DCCNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs CNMXF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, CNMXF has a market cap of 179.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while CNMXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas CNMXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CNMXF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to CNMXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs MAIFF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, MAIFF has a market cap of 158M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while MAIFF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas MAIFF's P/E ratio is -3.40. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MAIFF's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to MAIFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs EEYMF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, EEYMF has a market cap of 156.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while EEYMF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas EEYMF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to EEYMF's ROE of +1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is more volatile compared to EEYMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs FFMGF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, FFMGF has a market cap of 143.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while FFMGF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas FFMGF's P/E ratio is -13.31. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FFMGF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to FFMGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs NVOOF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, NVOOF has a market cap of 142.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while NVOOF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas NVOOF's P/E ratio is -10.64. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NVOOF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is more volatile compared to NVOOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs DNGDF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, DNGDF has a market cap of 142.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while DNGDF trades at $3.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas DNGDF's P/E ratio is 7.66. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DNGDF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is more volatile compared to DNGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs SITKF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, SITKF has a market cap of 140.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while SITKF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas SITKF's P/E ratio is -39.00. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SITKF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is more volatile compared to SITKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs MFGCF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, MFGCF has a market cap of 138.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while MFGCF trades at $1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas MFGCF's P/E ratio is -15.87. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MFGCF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is more volatile compared to MFGCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.
MNSAF vs AMXEF Comparison
MNSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSAF stands at 528.3M. In comparison, AMXEF has a market cap of 136.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSAF is priced at $1.76, while AMXEF trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.90, whereas AMXEF's P/E ratio is -111.50. In terms of profitability, MNSAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AMXEF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSAF is less volatile compared to AMXEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSAF.