Mandarin Oriental International Limited
Mandarin Oriental International Limited (MNOIY) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MNOIY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Travel Lodging Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MNOIY | $33.00 | +0.00% | 41.7B | -45.83 | -$0.72 | +102.36% |
| ICHGF | $130.00 | -1.04% | 19.7B | 27.03 | $4.86 | +1.30% |
| ACRFF | $48.50 | -9.43% | 11.4B | 18.37 | $2.64 | +2.95% |
| ACCYY | $9.46 | -0.37% | 10.8B | 24.85 | $0.37 | +3.13% |
| WTBDY | $7.93 | -1.49% | 5.4B | 16.06 | $0.48 | +4.19% |
| WTBCF | $30.27 | -12.03% | 5.1B | 15.68 | $1.93 | +4.27% |
| MINOF | $0.78 | +0.00% | 4.4B | 19.59 | $0.04 | +2.56% |
| PNDXF | $20.07 | +0.00% | 4.3B | 16.87 | $1.19 | +2.14% |
| MNILY | $17.50 | +0.00% | 4B | 17.16 | $1.02 | +2.88% |
| MAORF | $3.00 | +0.00% | 3.8B | -42.86 | -$0.07 | +21.67% |
Stock Comparison
MNOIY vs ICHGF Comparison March 2026
MNOIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNOIY stands at 41.7B. In comparison, ICHGF has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MNOIY is priced at $33.00, while ICHGF trades at $130.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNOIY currently has a P/E ratio of -45.83, whereas ICHGF's P/E ratio is 27.03. In terms of profitability, MNOIY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ICHGF's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MNOIY and ICHGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ICHGF's competition here
MNOIY vs ACRFF Comparison March 2026
MNOIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNOIY stands at 41.7B. In comparison, ACRFF has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MNOIY is priced at $33.00, while ACRFF trades at $48.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNOIY currently has a P/E ratio of -45.83, whereas ACRFF's P/E ratio is 18.37. In terms of profitability, MNOIY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ACRFF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MNOIY and ACRFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ACRFF's competition here
MNOIY vs ACCYY Comparison March 2026
MNOIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNOIY stands at 41.7B. In comparison, ACCYY has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MNOIY is priced at $33.00, while ACCYY trades at $9.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNOIY currently has a P/E ratio of -45.83, whereas ACCYY's P/E ratio is 24.85. In terms of profitability, MNOIY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ACCYY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MNOIY is less volatile compared to ACCYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNOIY.Check ACCYY's competition here
MNOIY vs WTBDY Comparison March 2026
MNOIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNOIY stands at 41.7B. In comparison, WTBDY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MNOIY is priced at $33.00, while WTBDY trades at $7.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNOIY currently has a P/E ratio of -45.83, whereas WTBDY's P/E ratio is 16.06. In terms of profitability, MNOIY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to WTBDY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MNOIY is less volatile compared to WTBDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNOIY.Check WTBDY's competition here
MNOIY vs WTBCF Comparison March 2026
MNOIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNOIY stands at 41.7B. In comparison, WTBCF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MNOIY is priced at $33.00, while WTBCF trades at $30.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNOIY currently has a P/E ratio of -45.83, whereas WTBCF's P/E ratio is 15.68. In terms of profitability, MNOIY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to WTBCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MNOIY and WTBCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WTBCF's competition here
MNOIY vs MINOF Comparison March 2026
MNOIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNOIY stands at 41.7B. In comparison, MINOF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MNOIY is priced at $33.00, while MINOF trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNOIY currently has a P/E ratio of -45.83, whereas MINOF's P/E ratio is 19.59. In terms of profitability, MNOIY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MINOF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MNOIY and MINOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MINOF's competition here
MNOIY vs PNDXF Comparison March 2026
MNOIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNOIY stands at 41.7B. In comparison, PNDXF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MNOIY is priced at $33.00, while PNDXF trades at $20.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNOIY currently has a P/E ratio of -45.83, whereas PNDXF's P/E ratio is 16.87. In terms of profitability, MNOIY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PNDXF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MNOIY is less volatile compared to PNDXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNOIY.Check PNDXF's competition here
MNOIY vs MNILY Comparison March 2026
MNOIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNOIY stands at 41.7B. In comparison, MNILY has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, MNOIY is priced at $33.00, while MNILY trades at $17.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNOIY currently has a P/E ratio of -45.83, whereas MNILY's P/E ratio is 17.16. In terms of profitability, MNOIY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MNILY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MNOIY and MNILY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MNILY's competition here
MNOIY vs MAORF Comparison March 2026
MNOIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNOIY stands at 41.7B. In comparison, MAORF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MNOIY is priced at $33.00, while MAORF trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNOIY currently has a P/E ratio of -45.83, whereas MAORF's P/E ratio is -42.86. In terms of profitability, MNOIY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MAORF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MNOIY and MAORF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MAORF's competition here
MNOIY vs NHHEF Comparison March 2026
MNOIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNOIY stands at 41.7B. In comparison, NHHEF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MNOIY is priced at $33.00, while NHHEF trades at $7.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNOIY currently has a P/E ratio of -45.83, whereas NHHEF's P/E ratio is 14.68. In terms of profitability, MNOIY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NHHEF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MNOIY and NHHEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NHHEF's competition here
MNOIY vs SMIZF Comparison March 2026
MNOIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNOIY stands at 41.7B. In comparison, SMIZF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MNOIY is priced at $33.00, while SMIZF trades at $9.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNOIY currently has a P/E ratio of -45.83, whereas SMIZF's P/E ratio is 11.24. In terms of profitability, MNOIY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SMIZF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MNOIY and SMIZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SMIZF's competition here
MNOIY vs SHALF Comparison March 2026
MNOIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNOIY stands at 41.7B. In comparison, SHALF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MNOIY is priced at $33.00, while SHALF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNOIY currently has a P/E ratio of -45.83, whereas SHALF's P/E ratio is 19.59. In terms of profitability, MNOIY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SHALF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MNOIY and SHALF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SHALF's competition here
MNOIY vs SHALY Comparison March 2026
MNOIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNOIY stands at 41.7B. In comparison, SHALY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MNOIY is priced at $33.00, while SHALY trades at $11.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNOIY currently has a P/E ratio of -45.83, whereas SHALY's P/E ratio is 16.58. In terms of profitability, MNOIY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SHALY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MNOIY is less volatile compared to SHALY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNOIY.Check SHALY's competition here
MNOIY vs DLTTF Comparison March 2026
MNOIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNOIY stands at 41.7B. In comparison, DLTTF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MNOIY is priced at $33.00, while DLTTF trades at $7.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNOIY currently has a P/E ratio of -45.83, whereas DLTTF's P/E ratio is 16.22. In terms of profitability, MNOIY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to DLTTF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MNOIY is less volatile compared to DLTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNOIY.Check DLTTF's competition here
MNOIY vs HKSHY Comparison March 2026
MNOIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNOIY stands at 41.7B. In comparison, HKSHY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MNOIY is priced at $33.00, while HKSHY trades at $17.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNOIY currently has a P/E ratio of -45.83, whereas HKSHY's P/E ratio is -14.29. In terms of profitability, MNOIY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to HKSHY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MNOIY and HKSHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HKSHY's competition here
MNOIY vs HKSHF Comparison March 2026
MNOIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNOIY stands at 41.7B. In comparison, HKSHF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MNOIY is priced at $33.00, while HKSHF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNOIY currently has a P/E ratio of -45.83, whereas HKSHF's P/E ratio is -13.33. In terms of profitability, MNOIY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to HKSHF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MNOIY and HKSHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HKSHF's competition here
MNOIY vs FATLF Comparison March 2026
MNOIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNOIY stands at 41.7B. In comparison, FATLF has a market cap of 839.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MNOIY is priced at $33.00, while FATLF trades at $24.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNOIY currently has a P/E ratio of -45.83, whereas FATLF's P/E ratio is 32.57. In terms of profitability, MNOIY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FATLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MNOIY and FATLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FATLF's competition here
MNOIY vs CLKFF Comparison March 2026
MNOIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNOIY stands at 41.7B. In comparison, CLKFF has a market cap of 252.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MNOIY is priced at $33.00, while CLKFF trades at $18.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNOIY currently has a P/E ratio of -45.83, whereas CLKFF's P/E ratio is 10.34. In terms of profitability, MNOIY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CLKFF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MNOIY is less volatile compared to CLKFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNOIY.Check CLKFF's competition here
MNOIY vs CTYLF Comparison March 2026
MNOIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNOIY stands at 41.7B. In comparison, CTYLF has a market cap of 179.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MNOIY is priced at $33.00, while CTYLF trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNOIY currently has a P/E ratio of -45.83, whereas CTYLF's P/E ratio is 16.39. In terms of profitability, MNOIY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CTYLF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MNOIY is less volatile compared to CTYLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNOIY.Check CTYLF's competition here
MNOIY vs HOCXF Comparison March 2026
MNOIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNOIY stands at 41.7B. In comparison, HOCXF has a market cap of 123.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MNOIY is priced at $33.00, while HOCXF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNOIY currently has a P/E ratio of -45.83, whereas HOCXF's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, MNOIY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to HOCXF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MNOIY and HOCXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HOCXF's competition here
MNOIY vs KCKSF Comparison March 2026
MNOIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNOIY stands at 41.7B. In comparison, KCKSF has a market cap of 102.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MNOIY is priced at $33.00, while KCKSF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNOIY currently has a P/E ratio of -45.83, whereas KCKSF's P/E ratio is 4.29. In terms of profitability, MNOIY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to KCKSF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MNOIY is less volatile compared to KCKSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNOIY.Check KCKSF's competition here
MNOIY vs AGORF Comparison March 2026
MNOIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNOIY stands at 41.7B. In comparison, AGORF has a market cap of 48.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MNOIY is priced at $33.00, while AGORF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNOIY currently has a P/E ratio of -45.83, whereas AGORF's P/E ratio is -4.33. In terms of profitability, MNOIY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AGORF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MNOIY and AGORF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AGORF's competition here
MNOIY vs SKTPP Comparison March 2026
MNOIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNOIY stands at 41.7B. In comparison, SKTPP has a market cap of 18.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MNOIY is priced at $33.00, while SKTPP trades at $203.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNOIY currently has a P/E ratio of -45.83, whereas SKTPP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNOIY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SKTPP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MNOIY and SKTPP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SKTPP's competition here
MNOIY vs SKTP Comparison March 2026
MNOIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNOIY stands at 41.7B. In comparison, SKTP has a market cap of 17.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MNOIY is priced at $33.00, while SKTP trades at $1,750.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNOIY currently has a P/E ratio of -45.83, whereas SKTP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNOIY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SKTP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MNOIY is less volatile compared to SKTP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNOIY.Check SKTP's competition here
MNOIY vs BUHF Comparison March 2026
MNOIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNOIY stands at 41.7B. In comparison, BUHF has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, MNOIY is priced at $33.00, while BUHF trades at $12.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNOIY currently has a P/E ratio of -45.83, whereas BUHF's P/E ratio is 12.49. In terms of profitability, MNOIY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BUHF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MNOIY and BUHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BUHF's competition here
MNOIY vs CAGU Comparison March 2026
MNOIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNOIY stands at 41.7B. In comparison, CAGU has a market cap of 4K. Regarding current trading prices, MNOIY is priced at $33.00, while CAGU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNOIY currently has a P/E ratio of -45.83, whereas CAGU's P/E ratio is 0.04. In terms of profitability, MNOIY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CAGU's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MNOIY is less volatile compared to CAGU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNOIY.Check CAGU's competition here
MNOIY vs SONDQ Comparison March 2026
MNOIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNOIY stands at 41.7B. In comparison, SONDQ has a market cap of 1.3K. Regarding current trading prices, MNOIY is priced at $33.00, while SONDQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNOIY currently has a P/E ratio of -45.83, whereas SONDQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNOIY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SONDQ's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, MNOIY and SONDQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SONDQ's competition here
MNOIY vs CNDL Comparison March 2026
MNOIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNOIY stands at 41.7B. In comparison, CNDL has a market cap of 903. Regarding current trading prices, MNOIY is priced at $33.00, while CNDL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNOIY currently has a P/E ratio of -45.83, whereas CNDL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MNOIY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CNDL's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MNOIY and CNDL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CNDL's competition here