Mitsui Mining & Smelting Co., Ltd.
Mitsui Mining & Smelting Co., Ltd. (MMSMY) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MMSMY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Other Precious Metals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMSMY | $39.00 | +1.09% | 11.7B | 38.21 | $1.07 | +0.45% |
| FNLPF | $52.04 | +0.00% | 39B | 85.39 | $0.62 | +1.69% |
| ANGPY | $15.19 | +0.00% | 25.1B | 319.20 | $0.05 | +3.60% |
| IMPUY | $17.24 | +0.00% | 16.6B | 368.30 | $0.05 | +0.52% |
| IMPUF | $17.15 | +0.00% | 16B | 357.00 | $0.05 | +0.55% |
| XZJCF | $183.35 | +40.58% | 10.5B | 34.40 | $5.33 | +0.69% |
| JINFF | $24.60 | +0.00% | 9.9B | 24.29 | $1.03 | +0.32% |
| GMINF | $35.55 | +0.00% | 8.3B | 32.08 | $1.13 | N/A |
| OICT | $11.50 | +0.00% | 6.3B | -39.25 | -$0.29 | N/A |
| NMPNF | $11.00 | +0.00% | 4.2B | 5.83 | $1.89 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MMSMY vs FNLPF Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, FNLPF has a market cap of 39B. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while FNLPF trades at $52.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas FNLPF's P/E ratio is 85.39. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FNLPF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is less volatile compared to FNLPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check FNLPF's competition here
MMSMY vs ANGPY Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, ANGPY has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while ANGPY trades at $15.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas ANGPY's P/E ratio is 319.20. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ANGPY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is less volatile compared to ANGPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check ANGPY's competition here
MMSMY vs IMPUY Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, IMPUY has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while IMPUY trades at $17.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas IMPUY's P/E ratio is 368.30. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to IMPUY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is more volatile compared to IMPUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check IMPUY's competition here
MMSMY vs IMPUF Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, IMPUF has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while IMPUF trades at $17.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas IMPUF's P/E ratio is 357.00. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to IMPUF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is more volatile compared to IMPUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check IMPUF's competition here
MMSMY vs XZJCF Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, XZJCF has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while XZJCF trades at $183.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas XZJCF's P/E ratio is 34.40. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to XZJCF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is more volatile compared to XZJCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check XZJCF's competition here
MMSMY vs JINFF Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, JINFF has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while JINFF trades at $24.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas JINFF's P/E ratio is 24.29. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JINFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is more volatile compared to JINFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check JINFF's competition here
MMSMY vs GMINF Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, GMINF has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while GMINF trades at $35.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas GMINF's P/E ratio is 32.08. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GMINF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is more volatile compared to GMINF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check GMINF's competition here
MMSMY vs OICT Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, OICT has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while OICT trades at $11.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas OICT's P/E ratio is -39.25. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OICT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is more volatile compared to OICT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check OICT's competition here
MMSMY vs NMPNF Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, NMPNF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while NMPNF trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas NMPNF's P/E ratio is 5.83. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NMPNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is more volatile compared to NMPNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check NMPNF's competition here
MMSMY vs ZMPLF Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, ZMPLF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while ZMPLF trades at $14.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas ZMPLF's P/E ratio is 38.21. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ZMPLF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is more volatile compared to ZMPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check ZMPLF's competition here
MMSMY vs POYYF Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, POYYF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while POYYF trades at $3.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas POYYF's P/E ratio is -5.07. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to POYYF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is more volatile compared to POYYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check POYYF's competition here
MMSMY vs ABBRF Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, ABBRF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while ABBRF trades at $10.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas ABBRF's P/E ratio is -99.55. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ABBRF's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is less volatile compared to ABBRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check ABBRF's competition here
MMSMY vs GLGDF Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, GLGDF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while GLGDF trades at $2.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas GLGDF's P/E ratio is 33.25. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GLGDF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is less volatile compared to GLGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check GLGDF's competition here
MMSMY vs AUCOY Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, AUCOY has a market cap of 899.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while AUCOY trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas AUCOY's P/E ratio is 4.04. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AUCOY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is less volatile compared to AUCOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check AUCOY's competition here
MMSMY vs TIHRF Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, TIHRF has a market cap of 579.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while TIHRF trades at $1.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas TIHRF's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TIHRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is more volatile compared to TIHRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check TIHRF's competition here
MMSMY vs FCSUF Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, FCSUF has a market cap of 578.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while FCSUF trades at $2.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas FCSUF's P/E ratio is 18.36. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FCSUF's ROE of +1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is more volatile compared to FCSUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check FCSUF's competition here
MMSMY vs BKRRF Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, BKRRF has a market cap of 404.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while BKRRF trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas BKRRF's P/E ratio is -19.50. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BKRRF's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is less volatile compared to BKRRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check BKRRF's competition here
MMSMY vs SAPLF Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, SAPLF has a market cap of 396.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while SAPLF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas SAPLF's P/E ratio is 19.06. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SAPLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is more volatile compared to SAPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check SAPLF's competition here
MMSMY vs SLVTF Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, SLVTF has a market cap of 363.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while SLVTF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas SLVTF's P/E ratio is -71.50. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SLVTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is less volatile compared to SLVTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check SLVTF's competition here
MMSMY vs IAUFF Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, IAUFF has a market cap of 343M. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while IAUFF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas IAUFF's P/E ratio is 21.50. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to IAUFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is more volatile compared to IAUFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check IAUFF's competition here
MMSMY vs BRVMF Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, BRVMF has a market cap of 337.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while BRVMF trades at $2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas BRVMF's P/E ratio is -102.00. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BRVMF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is less volatile compared to BRVMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check BRVMF's competition here
MMSMY vs TPRFF Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, TPRFF has a market cap of 332M. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while TPRFF trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas TPRFF's P/E ratio is -4.48. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TPRFF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is more volatile compared to TPRFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check TPRFF's competition here
MMSMY vs GOTRF Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, GOTRF has a market cap of 285.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while GOTRF trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas GOTRF's P/E ratio is -12.77. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GOTRF's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is less volatile compared to GOTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check GOTRF's competition here
MMSMY vs HGLD Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, HGLD has a market cap of 281.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while HGLD trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas HGLD's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HGLD's ROE of -4.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is less volatile compared to HGLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check HGLD's competition here
MMSMY vs CHPGF Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, CHPGF has a market cap of 269.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while CHPGF trades at $2.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas CHPGF's P/E ratio is -87.50. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CHPGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is less volatile compared to CHPGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check CHPGF's competition here
MMSMY vs SMDRF Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, SMDRF has a market cap of 267M. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while SMDRF trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas SMDRF's P/E ratio is -167.10. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SMDRF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is less volatile compared to SMDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check SMDRF's competition here
MMSMY vs PAASF Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, PAASF has a market cap of 259.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while PAASF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas PAASF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PAASF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is less volatile compared to PAASF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check PAASF's competition here
MMSMY vs SSVFF Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, SSVFF has a market cap of 231.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while SSVFF trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas SSVFF's P/E ratio is -28.75. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SSVFF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is less volatile compared to SSVFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check SSVFF's competition here
MMSMY vs CAPTF Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, CAPTF has a market cap of 189.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while CAPTF trades at $1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas CAPTF's P/E ratio is -173.00. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CAPTF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is less volatile compared to CAPTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check CAPTF's competition here
MMSMY vs ORVMF Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, ORVMF has a market cap of 168M. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while ORVMF trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas ORVMF's P/E ratio is -8.20. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ORVMF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is more volatile compared to ORVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check ORVMF's competition here
MMSMY vs SNNGF Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, SNNGF has a market cap of 167.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while SNNGF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas SNNGF's P/E ratio is -8.33. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SNNGF's ROE of +4.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is more volatile compared to SNNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check SNNGF's competition here
MMSMY vs BOCOF Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, BOCOF has a market cap of 160.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while BOCOF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas BOCOF's P/E ratio is -40.00. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BOCOF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is more volatile compared to BOCOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check BOCOF's competition here
MMSMY vs TBXXF Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, TBXXF has a market cap of 150.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while TBXXF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas TBXXF's P/E ratio is -18.12. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TBXXF's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is less volatile compared to TBXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check TBXXF's competition here
MMSMY vs XANAF Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, XANAF has a market cap of 137.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while XANAF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas XANAF's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to XANAF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is more volatile compared to XANAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check XANAF's competition here
MMSMY vs PLLHF Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, PLLHF has a market cap of 135.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while PLLHF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas PLLHF's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PLLHF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is more volatile compared to PLLHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check PLLHF's competition here
MMSMY vs TSORF Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, TSORF has a market cap of 127.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while TSORF trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas TSORF's P/E ratio is -121.07. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TSORF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is more volatile compared to TSORF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check TSORF's competition here
MMSMY vs OCGSF Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, OCGSF has a market cap of 126.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while OCGSF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas OCGSF's P/E ratio is -8.34. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OCGSF's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is less volatile compared to OCGSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check OCGSF's competition here
MMSMY vs EMPYF Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, EMPYF has a market cap of 115.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while EMPYF trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas EMPYF's P/E ratio is 30.17. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EMPYF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is less volatile compared to EMPYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check EMPYF's competition here
MMSMY vs NAUFF Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, NAUFF has a market cap of 113.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while NAUFF trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas NAUFF's P/E ratio is -21.39. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NAUFF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is less volatile compared to NAUFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check NAUFF's competition here
MMSMY vs SDRC Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, SDRC has a market cap of 112.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while SDRC trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas SDRC's P/E ratio is -299.40. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SDRC's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is less volatile compared to SDRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check SDRC's competition here
MMSMY vs SCTSF Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, SCTSF has a market cap of 108.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while SCTSF trades at $1.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas SCTSF's P/E ratio is -9.45. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SCTSF's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is less volatile compared to SCTSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check SCTSF's competition here
MMSMY vs CTNXF Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, CTNXF has a market cap of 105.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while CTNXF trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas CTNXF's P/E ratio is -17.88. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CTNXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is more volatile compared to CTNXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check CTNXF's competition here
MMSMY vs AGLDF Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, AGLDF has a market cap of 104.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while AGLDF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas AGLDF's P/E ratio is -8.50. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AGLDF's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is less volatile compared to AGLDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check AGLDF's competition here
MMSMY vs PGLDF Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, PGLDF has a market cap of 95.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while PGLDF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas PGLDF's P/E ratio is 30.75. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PGLDF's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is less volatile compared to PGLDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check PGLDF's competition here
MMSMY vs LUCRF Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, LUCRF has a market cap of 94.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while LUCRF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas LUCRF's P/E ratio is 1.73. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LUCRF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is more volatile compared to LUCRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check LUCRF's competition here
MMSMY vs AMNP Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, AMNP has a market cap of 92.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while AMNP trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas AMNP's P/E ratio is -10.50. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AMNP's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is more volatile compared to AMNP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check AMNP's competition here
MMSMY vs DNCVF Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, DNCVF has a market cap of 89.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while DNCVF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas DNCVF's P/E ratio is -24.62. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DNCVF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is less volatile compared to DNCVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check DNCVF's competition here
MMSMY vs VIPRF Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, VIPRF has a market cap of 88.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while VIPRF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas VIPRF's P/E ratio is -9.14. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VIPRF's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is less volatile compared to VIPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check VIPRF's competition here
MMSMY vs TEUTF Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, TEUTF has a market cap of 86.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while TEUTF trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas TEUTF's P/E ratio is -29.00. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TEUTF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is more volatile compared to TEUTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check TEUTF's competition here
MMSMY vs ACRG Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, ACRG has a market cap of 83.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while ACRG trades at $6.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas ACRG's P/E ratio is -13.33. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ACRG's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is more volatile compared to ACRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check ACRG's competition here
MMSMY vs LGCXF Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, LGCXF has a market cap of 81.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while LGCXF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas LGCXF's P/E ratio is -23.10. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LGCXF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is less volatile compared to LGCXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check LGCXF's competition here
MMSMY vs AGMRF Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, AGMRF has a market cap of 80.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while AGMRF trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas AGMRF's P/E ratio is -6.35. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AGMRF's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is less volatile compared to AGMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check AGMRF's competition here
MMSMY vs THMG Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, THMG has a market cap of 74.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while THMG trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas THMG's P/E ratio is -39.73. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to THMG's ROE of +8.97%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is less volatile compared to THMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check THMG's competition here
MMSMY vs VLMGF Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, VLMGF has a market cap of 70.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while VLMGF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas VLMGF's P/E ratio is -62.00. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VLMGF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is more volatile compared to VLMGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check VLMGF's competition here
MMSMY vs ELRFF Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, ELRFF has a market cap of 69.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while ELRFF trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas ELRFF's P/E ratio is -3.10. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ELRFF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is less volatile compared to ELRFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check ELRFF's competition here
MMSMY vs HEGLF Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, HEGLF has a market cap of 68.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while HEGLF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas HEGLF's P/E ratio is -2.23. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HEGLF's ROE of -7.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is more volatile compared to HEGLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check HEGLF's competition here
MMSMY vs KDKCF Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, KDKCF has a market cap of 68.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while KDKCF trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas KDKCF's P/E ratio is -71.37. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KDKCF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is less volatile compared to KDKCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check KDKCF's competition here
MMSMY vs LBCMF Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, LBCMF has a market cap of 66.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while LBCMF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas LBCMF's P/E ratio is -3.81. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LBCMF's ROE of -6.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is less volatile compared to LBCMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check LBCMF's competition here
MMSMY vs CPPMF Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, CPPMF has a market cap of 66.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while CPPMF trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas CPPMF's P/E ratio is -9.11. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CPPMF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is less volatile compared to CPPMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check CPPMF's competition here
MMSMY vs ARRKF Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, ARRKF has a market cap of 62M. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while ARRKF trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas ARRKF's P/E ratio is -4.68. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ARRKF's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is more volatile compared to ARRKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check ARRKF's competition here
MMSMY vs MMNGF Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, MMNGF has a market cap of 61.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while MMNGF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas MMNGF's P/E ratio is -29.00. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MMNGF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is less volatile compared to MMNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check MMNGF's competition here
MMSMY vs EQMEF Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, EQMEF has a market cap of 58.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while EQMEF trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas EQMEF's P/E ratio is -29.42. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EQMEF's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is less volatile compared to EQMEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check EQMEF's competition here
MMSMY vs EMPPF Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, EMPPF has a market cap of 57.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while EMPPF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas EMPPF's P/E ratio is -15.91. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EMPPF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is more volatile compared to EMPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check EMPPF's competition here
MMSMY vs BRGC Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, BRGC has a market cap of 55.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while BRGC trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas BRGC's P/E ratio is 0.07. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BRGC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is less volatile compared to BRGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check BRGC's competition here
MMSMY vs ACKRF Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, ACKRF has a market cap of 54.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while ACKRF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas ACKRF's P/E ratio is 11.40. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ACKRF's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is less volatile compared to ACKRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check ACKRF's competition here
MMSMY vs PDLMF Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, PDLMF has a market cap of 52.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while PDLMF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas PDLMF's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PDLMF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is more volatile compared to PDLMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check PDLMF's competition here
MMSMY vs VTXXF Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, VTXXF has a market cap of 52M. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while VTXXF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas VTXXF's P/E ratio is -10.55. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VTXXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is more volatile compared to VTXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check VTXXF's competition here
MMSMY vs SMOFF Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, SMOFF has a market cap of 51M. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while SMOFF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas SMOFF's P/E ratio is -9.81. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SMOFF's ROE of -5.71%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is less volatile compared to SMOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check SMOFF's competition here
MMSMY vs CTMCF Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, CTMCF has a market cap of 50.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while CTMCF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas CTMCF's P/E ratio is -13.83. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CTMCF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is more volatile compared to CTMCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check CTMCF's competition here
MMSMY vs KGFMF Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, KGFMF has a market cap of 49.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while KGFMF trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas KGFMF's P/E ratio is -56.00. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KGFMF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is less volatile compared to KGFMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check KGFMF's competition here
MMSMY vs ATEPF Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, ATEPF has a market cap of 46.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while ATEPF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas ATEPF's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ATEPF's ROE of -1.81%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is less volatile compared to ATEPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check ATEPF's competition here
MMSMY vs ADYRF Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, ADYRF has a market cap of 43.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while ADYRF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas ADYRF's P/E ratio is -8.50. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ADYRF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is more volatile compared to ADYRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check ADYRF's competition here
MMSMY vs RKHNF Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, RKHNF has a market cap of 41M. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while RKHNF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas RKHNF's P/E ratio is -14.00. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RKHNF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is more volatile compared to RKHNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check RKHNF's competition here
MMSMY vs DNRSF Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, DNRSF has a market cap of 40.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while DNRSF trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas DNRSF's P/E ratio is -3.53. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DNRSF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is less volatile compared to DNRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check DNRSF's competition here
MMSMY vs PNTRF Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, PNTRF has a market cap of 40M. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while PNTRF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas PNTRF's P/E ratio is -60.00. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PNTRF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is more volatile compared to PNTRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check PNTRF's competition here
MMSMY vs PVGDF Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, PVGDF has a market cap of 38.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while PVGDF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas PVGDF's P/E ratio is -22.09. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PVGDF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is less volatile compared to PVGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check PVGDF's competition here
MMSMY vs DYNR Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, DYNR has a market cap of 38.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while DYNR trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas DYNR's P/E ratio is 14.67. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DYNR's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is more volatile compared to DYNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check DYNR's competition here
MMSMY vs SSVRF Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, SSVRF has a market cap of 38.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while SSVRF trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas SSVRF's P/E ratio is -15.60. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SSVRF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is more volatile compared to SSVRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check SSVRF's competition here
MMSMY vs MRZLF Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, MRZLF has a market cap of 36.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while MRZLF trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas MRZLF's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MRZLF's ROE of -8.57%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is more volatile compared to MRZLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check MRZLF's competition here
MMSMY vs HMRRF Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, HMRRF has a market cap of 35.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while HMRRF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas HMRRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HMRRF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is more volatile compared to HMRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check HMRRF's competition here
MMSMY vs RITE Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, RITE has a market cap of 35.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while RITE trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas RITE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RITE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is less volatile compared to RITE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check RITE's competition here
MMSMY vs CJIMF Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, CJIMF has a market cap of 34.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while CJIMF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas CJIMF's P/E ratio is -67.90. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CJIMF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is more volatile compared to CJIMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check CJIMF's competition here
MMSMY vs SUNPF Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, SUNPF has a market cap of 34M. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while SUNPF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas SUNPF's P/E ratio is -39.00. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SUNPF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is more volatile compared to SUNPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check SUNPF's competition here
MMSMY vs WAMFF Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, WAMFF has a market cap of 32.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while WAMFF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas WAMFF's P/E ratio is -12.11. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WAMFF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is less volatile compared to WAMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check WAMFF's competition here
MMSMY vs OKPRF Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, OKPRF has a market cap of 31.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while OKPRF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas OKPRF's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OKPRF's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is less volatile compared to OKPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check OKPRF's competition here
MMSMY vs WEXPF Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, WEXPF has a market cap of 31.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while WEXPF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas WEXPF's P/E ratio is -5.99. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WEXPF's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is less volatile compared to WEXPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check WEXPF's competition here
MMSMY vs MHTZF Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, MHTZF has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while MHTZF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas MHTZF's P/E ratio is -5.57. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MHTZF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is more volatile compared to MHTZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check MHTZF's competition here
MMSMY vs TLSMF Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, TLSMF has a market cap of 30.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while TLSMF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas TLSMF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TLSMF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is more volatile compared to TLSMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check TLSMF's competition here
MMSMY vs ZLME Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, ZLME has a market cap of 29.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while ZLME trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas ZLME's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ZLME's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. MMSMY has daily volatility of 2.97 and ZLME has daily volatility of N/A.Check ZLME's competition here
MMSMY vs GLDRF Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, GLDRF has a market cap of 25.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while GLDRF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas GLDRF's P/E ratio is -6.25. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GLDRF's ROE of -17.55%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is less volatile compared to GLDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check GLDRF's competition here
MMSMY vs ASLRF Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, ASLRF has a market cap of 25M. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while ASLRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas ASLRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ASLRF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is more volatile compared to ASLRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check ASLRF's competition here
MMSMY vs STRFF Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, STRFF has a market cap of 25M. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while STRFF trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas STRFF's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to STRFF's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is less volatile compared to STRFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check STRFF's competition here
MMSMY vs ESGLF Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, ESGLF has a market cap of 24.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while ESGLF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas ESGLF's P/E ratio is -9.21. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ESGLF's ROE of +2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is less volatile compared to ESGLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check ESGLF's competition here
MMSMY vs SBMCF Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, SBMCF has a market cap of 24.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while SBMCF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas SBMCF's P/E ratio is -3.43. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SBMCF's ROE of +15.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is less volatile compared to SBMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check SBMCF's competition here
MMSMY vs AUCUF Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, AUCUF has a market cap of 22.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while AUCUF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas AUCUF's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AUCUF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is less volatile compared to AUCUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check AUCUF's competition here
MMSMY vs URVNF Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, URVNF has a market cap of 20.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while URVNF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas URVNF's P/E ratio is 43.33. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to URVNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is less volatile compared to URVNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check URVNF's competition here
MMSMY vs SHGDF Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, SHGDF has a market cap of 19.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while SHGDF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas SHGDF's P/E ratio is -2.57. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SHGDF's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is more volatile compared to SHGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check SHGDF's competition here
MMSMY vs SBLRF Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, SBLRF has a market cap of 18.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while SBLRF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas SBLRF's P/E ratio is 1.46. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SBLRF's ROE of +5.94%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is less volatile compared to SBLRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check SBLRF's competition here
MMSMY vs PLLMF Comparison February 2026
MMSMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMSMY stands at 11.7B. In comparison, PLLMF has a market cap of 18.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MMSMY is priced at $39.00, while PLLMF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMSMY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.21, whereas PLLMF's P/E ratio is 3.50. In terms of profitability, MMSMY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PLLMF's ROE of +1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, MMSMY is less volatile compared to PLLMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMSMY.Check PLLMF's competition here