M M Forgings Limited
M M Forgings Limited (MMFL.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MMFL.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMFL.NS | ₹412.05 | +1.77% | 19.9B | 22.97 | ₹17.94 | +0.97% |
| PTCIL.BO | ₹14,739.00 | -2.15% | 221B | 337.43 | ₹43.68 | N/A |
| PTCIL.NS | ₹14,726.00 | -2.02% | 220.8B | 337.83 | ₹43.59 | N/A |
| SANSERA.BO | ₹2,139.80 | -0.06% | 133.1B | 50.73 | ₹42.18 | +0.15% |
| SANSERA.NS | ₹2,136.60 | -0.27% | 132.9B | 50.76 | ₹42.09 | +0.15% |
| HAPPYFORGE.NS | ₹1,188.60 | +0.30% | 112.1B | 39.18 | ₹30.34 | +0.25% |
| GRAVITA.BO | ₹1,297.80 | -1.57% | 94.5B | 24.63 | ₹52.69 | +0.89% |
| GRAVITA.NS | ₹1,295.10 | -1.76% | 94.3B | 24.57 | ₹52.71 | +0.89% |
| KIRLFER.NS | ₹460.05 | +1.74% | 76.6B | 18.57 | ₹24.78 | +1.48% |
| RHIM.NS | ₹364.00 | -0.04% | 75.2B | 43.86 | ₹8.30 | +0.69% |
Stock Comparison
MMFL.NS vs PTCIL.BO Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, PTCIL.BO has a market cap of 221B. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while PTCIL.BO trades at ₹14,739.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas PTCIL.BO's P/E ratio is 337.43. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PTCIL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is more volatile compared to PTCIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check PTCIL.BO's competition here
MMFL.NS vs PTCIL.NS Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, PTCIL.NS has a market cap of 220.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while PTCIL.NS trades at ₹14,726.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas PTCIL.NS's P/E ratio is 337.83. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PTCIL.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is more volatile compared to PTCIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check PTCIL.NS's competition here
MMFL.NS vs SANSERA.BO Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, SANSERA.BO has a market cap of 133.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while SANSERA.BO trades at ₹2,139.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas SANSERA.BO's P/E ratio is 50.73. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SANSERA.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is more volatile compared to SANSERA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check SANSERA.BO's competition here
MMFL.NS vs SANSERA.NS Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, SANSERA.NS has a market cap of 132.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while SANSERA.NS trades at ₹2,136.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas SANSERA.NS's P/E ratio is 50.76. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SANSERA.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is more volatile compared to SANSERA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check SANSERA.NS's competition here
MMFL.NS vs HAPPYFORGE.NS Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, HAPPYFORGE.NS has a market cap of 112.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while HAPPYFORGE.NS trades at ₹1,188.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas HAPPYFORGE.NS's P/E ratio is 39.18. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HAPPYFORGE.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is more volatile compared to HAPPYFORGE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check HAPPYFORGE.NS's competition here
MMFL.NS vs GRAVITA.BO Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, GRAVITA.BO has a market cap of 94.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while GRAVITA.BO trades at ₹1,297.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas GRAVITA.BO's P/E ratio is 24.63. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GRAVITA.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is more volatile compared to GRAVITA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check GRAVITA.BO's competition here
MMFL.NS vs GRAVITA.NS Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, GRAVITA.NS has a market cap of 94.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while GRAVITA.NS trades at ₹1,295.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas GRAVITA.NS's P/E ratio is 24.57. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GRAVITA.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is more volatile compared to GRAVITA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check GRAVITA.NS's competition here
MMFL.NS vs KIRLFER.NS Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, KIRLFER.NS has a market cap of 76.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while KIRLFER.NS trades at ₹460.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas KIRLFER.NS's P/E ratio is 18.57. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KIRLFER.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is less volatile compared to KIRLFER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check KIRLFER.NS's competition here
MMFL.NS vs RHIM.NS Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, RHIM.NS has a market cap of 75.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while RHIM.NS trades at ₹364.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas RHIM.NS's P/E ratio is 43.86. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RHIM.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is more volatile compared to RHIM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check RHIM.NS's competition here
MMFL.NS vs RHIM.BO Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, RHIM.BO has a market cap of 75B. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while RHIM.BO trades at ₹363.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas RHIM.BO's P/E ratio is 43.82. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RHIM.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is more volatile compared to RHIM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check RHIM.BO's competition here
MMFL.NS vs KIRLFER.BO Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, KIRLFER.BO has a market cap of 61.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while KIRLFER.BO trades at ₹372.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas KIRLFER.BO's P/E ratio is 18.85. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KIRLFER.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is more volatile compared to KIRLFER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check KIRLFER.BO's competition here
MMFL.NS vs BALUFORGE.NS Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, BALUFORGE.NS has a market cap of 49B. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while BALUFORGE.NS trades at ₹429.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas BALUFORGE.NS's P/E ratio is 19.35. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BALUFORGE.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is less volatile compared to BALUFORGE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check BALUFORGE.NS's competition here
MMFL.NS vs AEROFLEX.NS Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, AEROFLEX.NS has a market cap of 32.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while AEROFLEX.NS trades at ₹252.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas AEROFLEX.NS's P/E ratio is 66.35. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AEROFLEX.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is more volatile compared to AEROFLEX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check AEROFLEX.NS's competition here
MMFL.NS vs AEROFLEX.BO Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, AEROFLEX.BO has a market cap of 32.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while AEROFLEX.BO trades at ₹252.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas AEROFLEX.BO's P/E ratio is 66.23. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AEROFLEX.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is more volatile compared to AEROFLEX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check AEROFLEX.BO's competition here
MMFL.NS vs KIRLOSIND.NS Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, KIRLOSIND.NS has a market cap of 29B. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while KIRLOSIND.NS trades at ₹2,763.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas KIRLOSIND.NS's P/E ratio is 17.90. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is less volatile compared to KIRLOSIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check KIRLOSIND.NS's competition here
MMFL.NS vs KIRLOSIND.BO Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, KIRLOSIND.BO has a market cap of 28.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while KIRLOSIND.BO trades at ₹2,746.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas KIRLOSIND.BO's P/E ratio is 17.34. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KIRLOSIND.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is less volatile compared to KIRLOSIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check KIRLOSIND.BO's competition here
MMFL.NS vs PITTIENG.BO Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, PITTIENG.BO has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while PITTIENG.BO trades at ₹740.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas PITTIENG.BO's P/E ratio is 21.14. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PITTIENG.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is more volatile compared to PITTIENG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check PITTIENG.BO's competition here
MMFL.NS vs SUNCLAY.NS Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, SUNCLAY.NS has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while SUNCLAY.NS trades at ₹1,250.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas SUNCLAY.NS's P/E ratio is -129.83. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SUNCLAY.NS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is more volatile compared to SUNCLAY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check SUNCLAY.NS's competition here
MMFL.NS vs PITTIENG.NS Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, PITTIENG.NS has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while PITTIENG.NS trades at ₹737.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas PITTIENG.NS's P/E ratio is 21.08. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PITTIENG.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is more volatile compared to PITTIENG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check PITTIENG.NS's competition here
MMFL.NS vs SBCL.BO Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, SBCL.BO has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while SBCL.BO trades at ₹411.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas SBCL.BO's P/E ratio is 25.98. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SBCL.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is more volatile compared to SBCL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check SBCL.BO's competition here
MMFL.NS vs SBCL.NS Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, SBCL.NS has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while SBCL.NS trades at ₹410.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas SBCL.NS's P/E ratio is 25.96. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SBCL.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is more volatile compared to SBCL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check SBCL.NS's competition here
MMFL.NS vs SHBCLQ.BO Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, SHBCLQ.BO has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while SHBCLQ.BO trades at ₹601.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas SHBCLQ.BO's P/E ratio is 193.16. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SHBCLQ.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is more volatile compared to SHBCLQ.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check SHBCLQ.BO's competition here
MMFL.NS vs DEEDEV.NS Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, DEEDEV.NS has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while DEEDEV.NS trades at ₹300.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas DEEDEV.NS's P/E ratio is 25.31. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DEEDEV.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is less volatile compared to DEEDEV.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check DEEDEV.NS's competition here
MMFL.NS vs MMFL.BO Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, MMFL.BO has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while MMFL.BO trades at ₹411.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas MMFL.BO's P/E ratio is 22.90. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MMFL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is less volatile compared to MMFL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check MMFL.BO's competition here
MMFL.NS vs FRONTSP.BO Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, FRONTSP.BO has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while FRONTSP.BO trades at ₹1,307.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas FRONTSP.BO's P/E ratio is 26.78. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FRONTSP.BO's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is more volatile compared to FRONTSP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check FRONTSP.BO's competition here
MMFL.NS vs AMIC.BO Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, AMIC.BO has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while AMIC.BO trades at ₹1,344.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas AMIC.BO's P/E ratio is 82.66. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AMIC.BO's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is more volatile compared to AMIC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check AMIC.BO's competition here
MMFL.NS vs MANAKCOAT.BO Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, MANAKCOAT.BO has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while MANAKCOAT.BO trades at ₹104.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas MANAKCOAT.BO's P/E ratio is 24.98. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MANAKCOAT.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is less volatile compared to MANAKCOAT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check MANAKCOAT.BO's competition here
MMFL.NS vs MANAKCOAT.NS Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, MANAKCOAT.NS has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while MANAKCOAT.NS trades at ₹103.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas MANAKCOAT.NS's P/E ratio is 24.93. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MANAKCOAT.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is less volatile compared to MANAKCOAT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check MANAKCOAT.NS's competition here
MMFL.NS vs NELCAST.BO Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, NELCAST.BO has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while NELCAST.BO trades at ₹123.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas NELCAST.BO's P/E ratio is 22.93. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NELCAST.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is more volatile compared to NELCAST.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check NELCAST.BO's competition here
MMFL.NS vs NELCAST.NS Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, NELCAST.NS has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while NELCAST.NS trades at ₹123.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas NELCAST.NS's P/E ratio is 22.93. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NELCAST.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is more volatile compared to NELCAST.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check NELCAST.NS's competition here
MMFL.NS vs ALICON.NS Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, ALICON.NS has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while ALICON.NS trades at ₹614.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas ALICON.NS's P/E ratio is 27.95. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ALICON.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is more volatile compared to ALICON.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check ALICON.NS's competition here
MMFL.NS vs ALICON.BO Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, ALICON.BO has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while ALICON.BO trades at ₹611.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas ALICON.BO's P/E ratio is 27.79. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ALICON.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is more volatile compared to ALICON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check ALICON.BO's competition here
MMFL.NS vs GANDHITUBE.BO Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, GANDHITUBE.BO has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while GANDHITUBE.BO trades at ₹807.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas GANDHITUBE.BO's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GANDHITUBE.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is more volatile compared to GANDHITUBE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check GANDHITUBE.BO's competition here
MMFL.NS vs GANDHITUBE.NS Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, GANDHITUBE.NS has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while GANDHITUBE.NS trades at ₹805.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas GANDHITUBE.NS's P/E ratio is 13.81. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GANDHITUBE.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is more volatile compared to GANDHITUBE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check GANDHITUBE.NS's competition here
MMFL.NS vs RAJGLOWIR.BO Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, RAJGLOWIR.BO has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while RAJGLOWIR.BO trades at ₹786.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas RAJGLOWIR.BO's P/E ratio is 32.18. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RAJGLOWIR.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is less volatile compared to RAJGLOWIR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check RAJGLOWIR.BO's competition here
MMFL.NS vs TEMBO.NS Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, TEMBO.NS has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while TEMBO.NS trades at ₹491.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas TEMBO.NS's P/E ratio is 12.17. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TEMBO.NS's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is more volatile compared to TEMBO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check TEMBO.NS's competition here
MMFL.NS vs ELECTHERM.NS Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, ELECTHERM.NS has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while ELECTHERM.NS trades at ₹594.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas ELECTHERM.NS's P/E ratio is 4.85. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ELECTHERM.NS's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is less volatile compared to ELECTHERM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check ELECTHERM.NS's competition here
MMFL.NS vs SGIL.NS Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, SGIL.NS has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while SGIL.NS trades at ₹485.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas SGIL.NS's P/E ratio is 92.51. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SGIL.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is more volatile compared to SGIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check SGIL.NS's competition here
MMFL.NS vs SGIL.BO Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, SGIL.BO has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while SGIL.BO trades at ₹482.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas SGIL.BO's P/E ratio is 91.26. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SGIL.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is more volatile compared to SGIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check SGIL.BO's competition here
MMFL.NS vs PRADPME.BO Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, PRADPME.BO has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while PRADPME.BO trades at ₹362.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas PRADPME.BO's P/E ratio is 23.11. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PRADPME.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is less volatile compared to PRADPME.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check PRADPME.BO's competition here
MMFL.NS vs UNIABEXAL.BO Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, UNIABEXAL.BO has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while UNIABEXAL.BO trades at ₹2,884.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas UNIABEXAL.BO's P/E ratio is 16.08. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UNIABEXAL.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is more volatile compared to UNIABEXAL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check UNIABEXAL.BO's competition here
MMFL.NS vs BAHETI.NS Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, BAHETI.NS has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while BAHETI.NS trades at ₹526.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas BAHETI.NS's P/E ratio is 30.28. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BAHETI.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is more volatile compared to BAHETI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check BAHETI.NS's competition here
MMFL.NS vs INVPRECQ.BO Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, INVPRECQ.BO has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while INVPRECQ.BO trades at ₹532.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas INVPRECQ.BO's P/E ratio is 53.99. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to INVPRECQ.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is more volatile compared to INVPRECQ.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check INVPRECQ.BO's competition here
MMFL.NS vs TIRUPATIFL.NS Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, TIRUPATIFL.NS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while TIRUPATIFL.NS trades at ₹43.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas TIRUPATIFL.NS's P/E ratio is 85.67. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is less volatile compared to TIRUPATIFL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check TIRUPATIFL.NS's competition here
MMFL.NS vs SIMPLEXCAS.BO Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, SIMPLEXCAS.BO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while SIMPLEXCAS.BO trades at ₹520.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas SIMPLEXCAS.BO's P/E ratio is 20.52. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SIMPLEXCAS.BO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is more volatile compared to SIMPLEXCAS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check SIMPLEXCAS.BO's competition here
MMFL.NS vs CTCL.BO Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, CTCL.BO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while CTCL.BO trades at ₹171.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas CTCL.BO's P/E ratio is 33.53. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CTCL.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is more volatile compared to CTCL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check CTCL.BO's competition here
MMFL.NS vs MAGNAELQ.BO Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, MAGNAELQ.BO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while MAGNAELQ.BO trades at ₹899.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas MAGNAELQ.BO's P/E ratio is 18.46. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MAGNAELQ.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is more volatile compared to MAGNAELQ.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check MAGNAELQ.BO's competition here
MMFL.NS vs ATMASTCO.NS Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, ATMASTCO.NS has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while ATMASTCO.NS trades at ₹139.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas ATMASTCO.NS's P/E ratio is 17.84. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ATMASTCO.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is less volatile compared to ATMASTCO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check ATMASTCO.NS's competition here
MMFL.NS vs ROLEXRINGS.BO Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, ROLEXRINGS.BO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while ROLEXRINGS.BO trades at ₹118.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas ROLEXRINGS.BO's P/E ratio is 16.42. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ROLEXRINGS.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is more volatile compared to ROLEXRINGS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check ROLEXRINGS.BO's competition here
MMFL.NS vs ROLEXRINGS.NS Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, ROLEXRINGS.NS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while ROLEXRINGS.NS trades at ₹118.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas ROLEXRINGS.NS's P/E ratio is 16.42. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ROLEXRINGS.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is more volatile compared to ROLEXRINGS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check ROLEXRINGS.NS's competition here
MMFL.NS vs MANAKSIA.NS Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, MANAKSIA.NS has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while MANAKSIA.NS trades at ₹47.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas MANAKSIA.NS's P/E ratio is 5.93. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MANAKSIA.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is more volatile compared to MANAKSIA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check MANAKSIA.NS's competition here
MMFL.NS vs MANAKSIA.BO Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, MANAKSIA.BO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while MANAKSIA.BO trades at ₹46.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas MANAKSIA.BO's P/E ratio is 5.91. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MANAKSIA.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is more volatile compared to MANAKSIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check MANAKSIA.BO's competition here
MMFL.NS vs LGBFORGE.NS Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, LGBFORGE.NS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while LGBFORGE.NS trades at ₹11.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas LGBFORGE.NS's P/E ratio is -49.75. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LGBFORGE.NS's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is less volatile compared to LGBFORGE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check LGBFORGE.NS's competition here
MMFL.NS vs SYNTHFO.BO Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, SYNTHFO.BO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while SYNTHFO.BO trades at ₹1,575.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas SYNTHFO.BO's P/E ratio is -2423.08. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SYNTHFO.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is less volatile compared to SYNTHFO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check SYNTHFO.BO's competition here
MMFL.NS vs SKP.NS Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, SKP.NS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while SKP.NS trades at ₹149.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas SKP.NS's P/E ratio is 46.83. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SKP.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is more volatile compared to SKP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check SKP.NS's competition here
MMFL.NS vs DPWIRES.BO Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, DPWIRES.BO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while DPWIRES.BO trades at ₹140.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas DPWIRES.BO's P/E ratio is 17.82. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DPWIRES.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is more volatile compared to DPWIRES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check DPWIRES.BO's competition here
MMFL.NS vs DPWIRES.NS Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, DPWIRES.NS has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while DPWIRES.NS trades at ₹139.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas DPWIRES.NS's P/E ratio is 17.68. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DPWIRES.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is more volatile compared to DPWIRES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check DPWIRES.NS's competition here
MMFL.NS vs KRISHCA.NS Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, KRISHCA.NS has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while KRISHCA.NS trades at ₹150.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas KRISHCA.NS's P/E ratio is 18.07. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KRISHCA.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is more volatile compared to KRISHCA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check KRISHCA.NS's competition here
MMFL.NS vs JAINAM.NS Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, JAINAM.NS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while JAINAM.NS trades at ₹174.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas JAINAM.NS's P/E ratio is -89.23. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JAINAM.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is more volatile compared to JAINAM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check JAINAM.NS's competition here
MMFL.NS vs MNKCMILTD.BO Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, MNKCMILTD.BO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while MNKCMILTD.BO trades at ₹29.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas MNKCMILTD.BO's P/E ratio is 125.80. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MNKCMILTD.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is more volatile compared to MNKCMILTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check MNKCMILTD.BO's competition here
MMFL.NS vs ALPHAIND.BO Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, ALPHAIND.BO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while ALPHAIND.BO trades at ₹182.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas ALPHAIND.BO's P/E ratio is 50.56. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ALPHAIND.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is more volatile compared to ALPHAIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check ALPHAIND.BO's competition here
MMFL.NS vs AEL.BO Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, AEL.BO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while AEL.BO trades at ₹125.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas AEL.BO's P/E ratio is 20.06. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AEL.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is less volatile compared to AEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check AEL.BO's competition here
MMFL.NS vs SIMMOND.BO Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, SIMMOND.BO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while SIMMOND.BO trades at ₹140.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas SIMMOND.BO's P/E ratio is 11.80. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SIMMOND.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is less volatile compared to SIMMOND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check SIMMOND.BO's competition here
MMFL.NS vs GALXBRG.BO Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, GALXBRG.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while GALXBRG.BO trades at ₹458.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas GALXBRG.BO's P/E ratio is 22.89. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GALXBRG.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is less volatile compared to GALXBRG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check GALXBRG.BO's competition here
MMFL.NS vs LGBFORGE.BO Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, LGBFORGE.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while LGBFORGE.BO trades at ₹6.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas LGBFORGE.BO's P/E ratio is -67.22. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LGBFORGE.BO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is less volatile compared to LGBFORGE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check LGBFORGE.BO's competition here
MMFL.NS vs NATFIT.BO Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, NATFIT.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while NATFIT.BO trades at ₹147.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas NATFIT.BO's P/E ratio is 6.10. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NATFIT.BO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is more volatile compared to NATFIT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check NATFIT.BO's competition here
MMFL.NS vs COSMOFE.BO Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, COSMOFE.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while COSMOFE.BO trades at ₹109.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas COSMOFE.BO's P/E ratio is -38.71. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to COSMOFE.BO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is less volatile compared to COSMOFE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check COSMOFE.BO's competition here
MMFL.NS vs KVFORGE.BO Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, KVFORGE.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while KVFORGE.BO trades at ₹114.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas KVFORGE.BO's P/E ratio is 17.52. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KVFORGE.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is more volatile compared to KVFORGE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check KVFORGE.BO's competition here
MMFL.NS vs DCM.BO Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, DCM.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while DCM.BO trades at ₹62.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas DCM.BO's P/E ratio is 4.44. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DCM.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is less volatile compared to DCM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check DCM.BO's competition here
MMFL.NS vs DCM.NS Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, DCM.NS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while DCM.NS trades at ₹62.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas DCM.NS's P/E ratio is 21.81. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DCM.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is less volatile compared to DCM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check DCM.NS's competition here
MMFL.NS vs MUL.BO Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, MUL.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while MUL.BO trades at ₹8.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas MUL.BO's P/E ratio is 4.12. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MUL.BO's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is more volatile compared to MUL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check MUL.BO's competition here
MMFL.NS vs AUTOPINS.BO Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, AUTOPINS.BO has a market cap of 964.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while AUTOPINS.BO trades at ₹169.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas AUTOPINS.BO's P/E ratio is 248.53. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AUTOPINS.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is more volatile compared to AUTOPINS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check AUTOPINS.BO's competition here
MMFL.NS vs SMLT.NS Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, SMLT.NS has a market cap of 866.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while SMLT.NS trades at ₹63.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas SMLT.NS's P/E ratio is 22.86. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SMLT.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is less volatile compared to SMLT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check SMLT.NS's competition here
MMFL.NS vs SMLT.BO Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, SMLT.BO has a market cap of 861.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while SMLT.BO trades at ₹62.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas SMLT.BO's P/E ratio is 22.72. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SMLT.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is more volatile compared to SMLT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check SMLT.BO's competition here
MMFL.NS vs RAPICUT.BO Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, RAPICUT.BO has a market cap of 820.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while RAPICUT.BO trades at ₹152.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas RAPICUT.BO's P/E ratio is 44.68. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RAPICUT.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is less volatile compared to RAPICUT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check RAPICUT.BO's competition here
MMFL.NS vs PATTECH.NS Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, PATTECH.NS has a market cap of 734.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while PATTECH.NS trades at ₹94.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas PATTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 73.98. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PATTECH.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is more volatile compared to PATTECH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check PATTECH.NS's competition here
MMFL.NS vs DECANBRG.BO Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, DECANBRG.BO has a market cap of 653.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while DECANBRG.BO trades at ₹299.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas DECANBRG.BO's P/E ratio is -325.60. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DECANBRG.BO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is more volatile compared to DECANBRG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check DECANBRG.BO's competition here
MMFL.NS vs HILTON.BO Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, HILTON.BO has a market cap of 484.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while HILTON.BO trades at ₹21.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas HILTON.BO's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HILTON.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is less volatile compared to HILTON.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check HILTON.BO's competition here
MMFL.NS vs HILTON.NS Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, HILTON.NS has a market cap of 484M. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while HILTON.NS trades at ₹21.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas HILTON.NS's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HILTON.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is less volatile compared to HILTON.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check HILTON.NS's competition here
MMFL.NS vs VISHALBL.BO Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, VISHALBL.BO has a market cap of 462M. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while VISHALBL.BO trades at ₹42.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas VISHALBL.BO's P/E ratio is -23.65. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VISHALBL.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is more volatile compared to VISHALBL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check VISHALBL.BO's competition here
MMFL.NS vs SMFIL.BO Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, SMFIL.BO has a market cap of 418.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while SMFIL.BO trades at ₹4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas SMFIL.BO's P/E ratio is 58.57. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SMFIL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is more volatile compared to SMFIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check SMFIL.BO's competition here
MMFL.NS vs AUSTENG.BO Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, AUSTENG.BO has a market cap of 381.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while AUSTENG.BO trades at ₹109.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas AUSTENG.BO's P/E ratio is 8.41. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AUSTENG.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is less volatile compared to AUSTENG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check AUSTENG.BO's competition here
MMFL.NS vs GANGAFORGE.NS Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, GANGAFORGE.NS has a market cap of 358.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while GANGAFORGE.NS trades at ₹2.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas GANGAFORGE.NS's P/E ratio is -11.08. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GANGAFORGE.NS's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is less volatile compared to GANGAFORGE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check GANGAFORGE.NS's competition here
MMFL.NS vs RELICAB.BO Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, RELICAB.BO has a market cap of 344.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while RELICAB.BO trades at ₹34.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas RELICAB.BO's P/E ratio is 23.57. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RELICAB.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is more volatile compared to RELICAB.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check RELICAB.BO's competition here
MMFL.NS vs CARNATIN.BO Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, CARNATIN.BO has a market cap of 278.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while CARNATIN.BO trades at ₹80.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas CARNATIN.BO's P/E ratio is -20.11. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CARNATIN.BO's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is more volatile compared to CARNATIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check CARNATIN.BO's competition here
MMFL.NS vs ARCOTECH.NS Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, ARCOTECH.NS has a market cap of 245.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while ARCOTECH.NS trades at ₹2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas ARCOTECH.NS's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ARCOTECH.NS's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is more volatile compared to ARCOTECH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check ARCOTECH.NS's competition here
MMFL.NS vs BOMBWIR.BO Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, BOMBWIR.BO has a market cap of 224.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while BOMBWIR.BO trades at ₹42.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas BOMBWIR.BO's P/E ratio is -23.86. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BOMBWIR.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is less volatile compared to BOMBWIR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check BOMBWIR.BO's competition here
MMFL.NS vs SHREMETAL.BO Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, SHREMETAL.BO has a market cap of 203.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while SHREMETAL.BO trades at ₹38.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas SHREMETAL.BO's P/E ratio is 14.61. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SHREMETAL.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is more volatile compared to SHREMETAL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check SHREMETAL.BO's competition here
MMFL.NS vs METALFORGE.NS Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, METALFORGE.NS has a market cap of 178.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while METALFORGE.NS trades at ₹4.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas METALFORGE.NS's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to METALFORGE.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is more volatile compared to METALFORGE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check METALFORGE.NS's competition here
MMFL.NS vs BILENERGY.NS Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, BILENERGY.NS has a market cap of 139.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while BILENERGY.NS trades at ₹0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas BILENERGY.NS's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BILENERGY.NS's ROE of +2.63%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is less volatile compared to BILENERGY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check BILENERGY.NS's competition here
MMFL.NS vs GALAGEX.BO Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, GALAGEX.BO has a market cap of 128.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while GALAGEX.BO trades at ₹47.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas GALAGEX.BO's P/E ratio is 3.44. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GALAGEX.BO's ROE of +1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is less volatile compared to GALAGEX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check GALAGEX.BO's competition here
MMFL.NS vs SHIVAGR.BO Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, SHIVAGR.BO has a market cap of 105M. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while SHIVAGR.BO trades at ₹20.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas SHIVAGR.BO's P/E ratio is 22.05. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SHIVAGR.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is less volatile compared to SHIVAGR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check SHIVAGR.BO's competition here
MMFL.NS vs AMFORG.BO Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, AMFORG.BO has a market cap of 102M. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while AMFORG.BO trades at ₹7.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas AMFORG.BO's P/E ratio is 26.26. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AMFORG.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is more volatile compared to AMFORG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check AMFORG.BO's competition here
MMFL.NS vs AANCHALISP.BO Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, AANCHALISP.BO has a market cap of 76.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while AANCHALISP.BO trades at ₹26.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas AANCHALISP.BO's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AANCHALISP.BO's ROE of -1.63%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is more volatile compared to AANCHALISP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check AANCHALISP.BO's competition here
MMFL.NS vs GOLKONDA.BO Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, GOLKONDA.BO has a market cap of 34.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while GOLKONDA.BO trades at ₹6.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas GOLKONDA.BO's P/E ratio is 65.20. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GOLKONDA.BO's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is more volatile compared to GOLKONDA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check GOLKONDA.BO's competition here
MMFL.NS vs ROHITFERRO.NS Comparison April 2026
MMFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMFL.NS stands at 19.9B. In comparison, ROHITFERRO.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MMFL.NS is priced at ₹412.05, while ROHITFERRO.NS trades at ₹28.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas ROHITFERRO.NS's P/E ratio is -4.58. In terms of profitability, MMFL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ROHITFERRO.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MMFL.NS is less volatile compared to ROHITFERRO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMFL.NS.Check ROHITFERRO.NS's competition here