Marley Spoon AG
Marley Spoon AG (MLYSF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MLYSF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Restaurants Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MLYSF | $0.25 | +0.00% | 399M | -25.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| CMPGF | $30.09 | +4.59% | 51.2B | 27.36 | $1.10 | +2.19% |
| CMPGY | $29.69 | +0.00% | 51B | 27.28 | $1.10 | +2.13% |
| RSTRF | $68.05 | +0.00% | 22.8B | 25.68 | $2.65 | +3.60% |
| LKNCY | $38.69 | +0.00% | 12.5B | 22.29 | $1.75 | N/A |
| HDALF | $1.94 | +0.00% | 10.5B | 16.17 | $0.12 | +5.57% |
| MDNDF | $42.00 | +0.00% | 5.6B | 25.61 | $1.64 | +0.85% |
| JBFCF | $3.48 | -1.42% | 3.9B | 21.75 | $0.16 | +1.72% |
| JBFCY | $13.97 | -2.17% | 3.9B | 22.27 | $0.62 | +1.72% |
| ALSSF | $3.69 | +10.15% | 3B | -184.50 | -$0.02 | +2.45% |
Stock Comparison
MLYSF vs CMPGF Comparison February 2026
MLYSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYSF stands at 399M. In comparison, CMPGF has a market cap of 51.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYSF is priced at $0.25, while CMPGF trades at $30.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYSF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.00, whereas CMPGF's P/E ratio is 27.36. In terms of profitability, MLYSF's ROE is +0.79%, compared to CMPGF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYSF is less volatile compared to CMPGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYSF.Check CMPGF's competition here
MLYSF vs CMPGY Comparison February 2026
MLYSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYSF stands at 399M. In comparison, CMPGY has a market cap of 51B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYSF is priced at $0.25, while CMPGY trades at $29.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYSF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.00, whereas CMPGY's P/E ratio is 27.28. In terms of profitability, MLYSF's ROE is +0.79%, compared to CMPGY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYSF is less volatile compared to CMPGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYSF.Check CMPGY's competition here
MLYSF vs RSTRF Comparison February 2026
MLYSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYSF stands at 399M. In comparison, RSTRF has a market cap of 22.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYSF is priced at $0.25, while RSTRF trades at $68.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYSF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.00, whereas RSTRF's P/E ratio is 25.68. In terms of profitability, MLYSF's ROE is +0.79%, compared to RSTRF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYSF and RSTRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RSTRF's competition here
MLYSF vs LKNCY Comparison February 2026
MLYSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYSF stands at 399M. In comparison, LKNCY has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYSF is priced at $0.25, while LKNCY trades at $38.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYSF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.00, whereas LKNCY's P/E ratio is 22.29. In terms of profitability, MLYSF's ROE is +0.79%, compared to LKNCY's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYSF is less volatile compared to LKNCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYSF.Check LKNCY's competition here
MLYSF vs HDALF Comparison February 2026
MLYSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYSF stands at 399M. In comparison, HDALF has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYSF is priced at $0.25, while HDALF trades at $1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYSF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.00, whereas HDALF's P/E ratio is 16.17. In terms of profitability, MLYSF's ROE is +0.79%, compared to HDALF's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYSF and HDALF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HDALF's competition here
MLYSF vs MDNDF Comparison February 2026
MLYSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYSF stands at 399M. In comparison, MDNDF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYSF is priced at $0.25, while MDNDF trades at $42.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYSF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.00, whereas MDNDF's P/E ratio is 25.61. In terms of profitability, MLYSF's ROE is +0.79%, compared to MDNDF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYSF and MDNDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MDNDF's competition here
MLYSF vs JBFCF Comparison February 2026
MLYSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYSF stands at 399M. In comparison, JBFCF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYSF is priced at $0.25, while JBFCF trades at $3.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYSF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.00, whereas JBFCF's P/E ratio is 21.75. In terms of profitability, MLYSF's ROE is +0.79%, compared to JBFCF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYSF is less volatile compared to JBFCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYSF.Check JBFCF's competition here
MLYSF vs JBFCY Comparison February 2026
MLYSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYSF stands at 399M. In comparison, JBFCY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYSF is priced at $0.25, while JBFCY trades at $13.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYSF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.00, whereas JBFCY's P/E ratio is 22.27. In terms of profitability, MLYSF's ROE is +0.79%, compared to JBFCY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYSF is less volatile compared to JBFCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYSF.Check JBFCY's competition here
MLYSF vs ALSSF Comparison February 2026
MLYSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYSF stands at 399M. In comparison, ALSSF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYSF is priced at $0.25, while ALSSF trades at $3.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYSF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.00, whereas ALSSF's P/E ratio is -184.50. In terms of profitability, MLYSF's ROE is +0.79%, compared to ALSSF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYSF is less volatile compared to ALSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYSF.Check ALSSF's competition here
MLYSF vs ATGSY Comparison February 2026
MLYSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYSF stands at 399M. In comparison, ATGSY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYSF is priced at $0.25, while ATGSY trades at $6.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYSF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.00, whereas ATGSY's P/E ratio is -40.94. In terms of profitability, MLYSF's ROE is +0.79%, compared to ATGSY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYSF and ATGSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ATGSY's competition here
MLYSF vs SKLYF Comparison February 2026
MLYSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYSF stands at 399M. In comparison, SKLYF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYSF is priced at $0.25, while SKLYF trades at $10.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYSF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.00, whereas SKLYF's P/E ratio is 152.86. In terms of profitability, MLYSF's ROE is +0.79%, compared to SKLYF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYSF and SKLYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SKLYF's competition here
MLYSF vs ATGSF Comparison February 2026
MLYSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYSF stands at 399M. In comparison, ATGSF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYSF is priced at $0.25, while ATGSF trades at $5.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYSF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.00, whereas ATGSF's P/E ratio is -37.53. In terms of profitability, MLYSF's ROE is +0.79%, compared to ATGSF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYSF and ATGSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ATGSF's competition here
MLYSF vs MBPFF Comparison February 2026
MLYSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYSF stands at 399M. In comparison, MBPFF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYSF is priced at $0.25, while MBPFF trades at $3.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYSF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.00, whereas MBPFF's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, MLYSF's ROE is +0.79%, compared to MBPFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYSF and MBPFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MBPFF's competition here
MLYSF vs SGLOF Comparison February 2026
MLYSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYSF stands at 399M. In comparison, SGLOF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYSF is priced at $0.25, while SGLOF trades at $17.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYSF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.00, whereas SGLOF's P/E ratio is 29.71. In terms of profitability, MLYSF's ROE is +0.79%, compared to SGLOF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYSF and SGLOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SGLOF's competition here
MLYSF vs SSPPF Comparison February 2026
MLYSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYSF stands at 399M. In comparison, SSPPF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYSF is priced at $0.25, while SSPPF trades at $2.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYSF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.00, whereas SSPPF's P/E ratio is -19.31. In terms of profitability, MLYSF's ROE is +0.79%, compared to SSPPF's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYSF and SSPPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SSPPF's competition here
MLYSF vs ARHOF Comparison February 2026
MLYSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYSF stands at 399M. In comparison, ARHOF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYSF is priced at $0.25, while ARHOF trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYSF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.00, whereas ARHOF's P/E ratio is -9.57. In terms of profitability, MLYSF's ROE is +0.79%, compared to ARHOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYSF and ARHOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ARHOF's competition here
MLYSF vs DPZUF Comparison February 2026
MLYSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYSF stands at 399M. In comparison, DPZUF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYSF is priced at $0.25, while DPZUF trades at $15.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYSF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.00, whereas DPZUF's P/E ratio is -520.00. In terms of profitability, MLYSF's ROE is +0.79%, compared to DPZUF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYSF and DPZUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DPZUF's competition here
MLYSF vs DMZPY Comparison February 2026
MLYSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYSF stands at 399M. In comparison, DMZPY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYSF is priced at $0.25, while DMZPY trades at $7.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYSF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.00, whereas DMZPY's P/E ratio is -770.00. In terms of profitability, MLYSF's ROE is +0.79%, compared to DMZPY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYSF and DMZPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DMZPY's competition here
MLYSF vs ELORY Comparison February 2026
MLYSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYSF stands at 399M. In comparison, ELORY has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYSF is priced at $0.25, while ELORY trades at $4.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYSF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.00, whereas ELORY's P/E ratio is -2.48. In terms of profitability, MLYSF's ROE is +0.79%, compared to ELORY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYSF and ELORY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ELORY's competition here
MLYSF vs DPUKY Comparison February 2026
MLYSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYSF stands at 399M. In comparison, DPUKY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYSF is priced at $0.25, while DPUKY trades at $5.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYSF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.00, whereas DPUKY's P/E ratio is 10.13. In terms of profitability, MLYSF's ROE is +0.79%, compared to DPUKY's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYSF is less volatile compared to DPUKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYSF.Check DPUKY's competition here
MLYSF vs WHCA Comparison February 2026
MLYSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYSF stands at 399M. In comparison, WHCA has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYSF is priced at $0.25, while WHCA trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYSF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.00, whereas WHCA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MLYSF's ROE is +0.79%, compared to WHCA's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYSF is less volatile compared to WHCA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYSF.Check WHCA's competition here
MLYSF vs JDWPY Comparison February 2026
MLYSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYSF stands at 399M. In comparison, JDWPY has a market cap of 986M. Regarding current trading prices, MLYSF is priced at $0.25, while JDWPY trades at $44.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYSF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.00, whereas JDWPY's P/E ratio is 11.49. In terms of profitability, MLYSF's ROE is +0.79%, compared to JDWPY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYSF and JDWPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JDWPY's competition here
MLYSF vs HLFFF Comparison February 2026
MLYSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYSF stands at 399M. In comparison, HLFFF has a market cap of 954.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MLYSF is priced at $0.25, while HLFFF trades at $6.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYSF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.00, whereas HLFFF's P/E ratio is -4.78. In terms of profitability, MLYSF's ROE is +0.79%, compared to HLFFF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYSF and HLFFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HLFFF's competition here
MLYSF vs JDWPF Comparison February 2026
MLYSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYSF stands at 399M. In comparison, JDWPF has a market cap of 930.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MLYSF is priced at $0.25, while JDWPF trades at $8.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYSF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.00, whereas JDWPF's P/E ratio is 11.32. In terms of profitability, MLYSF's ROE is +0.79%, compared to JDWPF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYSF and JDWPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JDWPF's competition here
MLYSF vs HELFY Comparison February 2026
MLYSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYSF stands at 399M. In comparison, HELFY has a market cap of 886.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MLYSF is priced at $0.25, while HELFY trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYSF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.00, whereas HELFY's P/E ratio is -4.47. In terms of profitability, MLYSF's ROE is +0.79%, compared to HELFY's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYSF and HELFY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HELFY's competition here
MLYSF vs ELROF Comparison February 2026
MLYSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYSF stands at 399M. In comparison, ELROF has a market cap of 842.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MLYSF is priced at $0.25, while ELROF trades at $3.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYSF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.00, whereas ELROF's P/E ratio is 8.32. In terms of profitability, MLYSF's ROE is +0.79%, compared to ELROF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYSF and ELROF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ELROF's competition here
MLYSF vs DMPZF Comparison February 2026
MLYSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYSF stands at 399M. In comparison, DMPZF has a market cap of 839.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MLYSF is priced at $0.25, while DMPZF trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYSF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.00, whereas DMPZF's P/E ratio is 8.15. In terms of profitability, MLYSF's ROE is +0.79%, compared to DMPZF's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYSF and DMPZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DMPZF's competition here
MLYSF vs CLLFF Comparison February 2026
MLYSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYSF stands at 399M. In comparison, CLLFF has a market cap of 815.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MLYSF is priced at $0.25, while CLLFF trades at $6.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYSF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.00, whereas CLLFF's P/E ratio is 138.00. In terms of profitability, MLYSF's ROE is +0.79%, compared to CLLFF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYSF is less volatile compared to CLLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYSF.Check CLLFF's competition here
MLYSF vs MTYFF Comparison February 2026
MLYSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYSF stands at 399M. In comparison, MTYFF has a market cap of 718.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MLYSF is priced at $0.25, while MTYFF trades at $32.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYSF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.00, whereas MTYFF's P/E ratio is 28.86. In terms of profitability, MLYSF's ROE is +0.79%, compared to MTYFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYSF is less volatile compared to MTYFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYSF.Check MTYFF's competition here
MLYSF vs RSTGF Comparison February 2026
MLYSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYSF stands at 399M. In comparison, RSTGF has a market cap of 649.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MLYSF is priced at $0.25, while RSTGF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYSF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.00, whereas RSTGF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, MLYSF's ROE is +0.79%, compared to RSTGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MLYSF and RSTGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RSTGF's competition here
MLYSF vs MRTPY Comparison February 2026
MLYSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYSF stands at 399M. In comparison, MRTPY has a market cap of 506.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MLYSF is priced at $0.25, while MRTPY trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYSF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.00, whereas MRTPY's P/E ratio is 5.30. In terms of profitability, MLYSF's ROE is +0.79%, compared to MRTPY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYSF and MRTPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MRTPY's competition here
MLYSF vs MARZF Comparison February 2026
MLYSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYSF stands at 399M. In comparison, MARZF has a market cap of 505M. Regarding current trading prices, MLYSF is priced at $0.25, while MARZF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYSF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.00, whereas MARZF's P/E ratio is 5.32. In terms of profitability, MLYSF's ROE is +0.79%, compared to MARZF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYSF and MARZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MARZF's competition here
MLYSF vs CFCGF Comparison February 2026
MLYSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYSF stands at 399M. In comparison, CFCGF has a market cap of 502.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MLYSF is priced at $0.25, while CFCGF trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYSF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.00, whereas CFCGF's P/E ratio is 87.62. In terms of profitability, MLYSF's ROE is +0.79%, compared to CFCGF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYSF is less volatile compared to CFCGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYSF.Check CFCGF's competition here
MLYSF vs RTBRF Comparison February 2026
MLYSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYSF stands at 399M. In comparison, RTBRF has a market cap of 351.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MLYSF is priced at $0.25, while RTBRF trades at $2.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYSF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.00, whereas RTBRF's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, MLYSF's ROE is +0.79%, compared to RTBRF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYSF and RTBRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RTBRF's competition here
MLYSF vs FMBRY Comparison February 2026
MLYSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYSF stands at 399M. In comparison, FMBRY has a market cap of 330.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MLYSF is priced at $0.25, while FMBRY trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYSF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.00, whereas FMBRY's P/E ratio is 9.30. In terms of profitability, MLYSF's ROE is +0.79%, compared to FMBRY's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYSF and FMBRY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FMBRY's competition here
MLYSF vs PZRIF Comparison February 2026
MLYSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYSF stands at 399M. In comparison, PZRIF has a market cap of 293.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MLYSF is priced at $0.25, while PZRIF trades at $11.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYSF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.00, whereas PZRIF's P/E ratio is 17.28. In terms of profitability, MLYSF's ROE is +0.79%, compared to PZRIF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYSF and PZRIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PZRIF's competition here
MLYSF vs CRNGF Comparison February 2026
MLYSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYSF stands at 399M. In comparison, CRNGF has a market cap of 172.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MLYSF is priced at $0.25, while CRNGF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYSF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.00, whereas CRNGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MLYSF's ROE is +0.79%, compared to CRNGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MLYSF and CRNGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CRNGF's competition here
MLYSF vs DLII Comparison February 2026
MLYSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYSF stands at 399M. In comparison, DLII has a market cap of 168.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MLYSF is priced at $0.25, while DLII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYSF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.00, whereas DLII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MLYSF's ROE is +0.79%, compared to DLII's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MLYSF and DLII have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DLII's competition here
MLYSF vs XIAXF Comparison February 2026
MLYSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYSF stands at 399M. In comparison, XIAXF has a market cap of 144.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MLYSF is priced at $0.25, while XIAXF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYSF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.00, whereas XIAXF's P/E ratio is -4.59. In terms of profitability, MLYSF's ROE is +0.79%, compared to XIAXF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYSF and XIAXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check XIAXF's competition here
MLYSF vs FRWDF Comparison February 2026
MLYSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYSF stands at 399M. In comparison, FRWDF has a market cap of 82.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MLYSF is priced at $0.25, while FRWDF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYSF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.00, whereas FRWDF's P/E ratio is 21.27. In terms of profitability, MLYSF's ROE is +0.79%, compared to FRWDF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYSF and FRWDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FRWDF's competition here
MLYSF vs FRHHF Comparison February 2026
MLYSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYSF stands at 399M. In comparison, FRHHF has a market cap of 50.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MLYSF is priced at $0.25, while FRHHF trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYSF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.00, whereas FRHHF's P/E ratio is -6.08. In terms of profitability, MLYSF's ROE is +0.79%, compared to FRHHF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MLYSF and FRHHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FRHHF's competition here
MLYSF vs TNGPF Comparison February 2026
MLYSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYSF stands at 399M. In comparison, TNGPF has a market cap of 47.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MLYSF is priced at $0.25, while TNGPF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYSF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.00, whereas TNGPF's P/E ratio is 4.10. In terms of profitability, MLYSF's ROE is +0.79%, compared to TNGPF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYSF is less volatile compared to TNGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYSF.Check TNGPF's competition here
MLYSF vs MHGUP Comparison February 2026
MLYSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYSF stands at 399M. In comparison, MHGUP has a market cap of 33.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MLYSF is priced at $0.25, while MHGUP trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYSF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.00, whereas MHGUP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MLYSF's ROE is +0.79%, compared to MHGUP's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYSF and MHGUP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MHGUP's competition here
MLYSF vs FBGI Comparison February 2026
MLYSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYSF stands at 399M. In comparison, FBGI has a market cap of 30.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MLYSF is priced at $0.25, while FBGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYSF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.00, whereas FBGI's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, MLYSF's ROE is +0.79%, compared to FBGI's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYSF is less volatile compared to FBGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYSF.Check FBGI's competition here
MLYSF vs GLLDF Comparison February 2026
MLYSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYSF stands at 399M. In comparison, GLLDF has a market cap of 27.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MLYSF is priced at $0.25, while GLLDF trades at $2.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYSF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.00, whereas GLLDF's P/E ratio is 7.51. In terms of profitability, MLYSF's ROE is +0.79%, compared to GLLDF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYSF and GLLDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GLLDF's competition here
MLYSF vs MHGU Comparison February 2026
MLYSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYSF stands at 399M. In comparison, MHGU has a market cap of 21.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MLYSF is priced at $0.25, while MHGU trades at $3.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYSF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.00, whereas MHGU's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, MLYSF's ROE is +0.79%, compared to MHGU's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYSF is less volatile compared to MHGU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYSF.Check MHGU's competition here
MLYSF vs MORRF Comparison February 2026
MLYSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYSF stands at 399M. In comparison, MORRF has a market cap of 20.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MLYSF is priced at $0.25, while MORRF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYSF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.00, whereas MORRF's P/E ratio is -2.33. In terms of profitability, MLYSF's ROE is +0.79%, compared to MORRF's ROE of -2.51%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYSF and MORRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MORRF's competition here
MLYSF vs SCUPF Comparison February 2026
MLYSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYSF stands at 399M. In comparison, SCUPF has a market cap of 17.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MLYSF is priced at $0.25, while SCUPF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYSF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.00, whereas SCUPF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, MLYSF's ROE is +0.79%, compared to SCUPF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYSF and SCUPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SCUPF's competition here
MLYSF vs GTEH Comparison February 2026
MLYSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYSF stands at 399M. In comparison, GTEH has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MLYSF is priced at $0.25, while GTEH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYSF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.00, whereas GTEH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MLYSF's ROE is +0.79%, compared to GTEH's ROE of -2.69%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYSF is less volatile compared to GTEH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYSF.Check GTEH's competition here
MLYSF vs FCCI Comparison February 2026
MLYSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYSF stands at 399M. In comparison, FCCI has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MLYSF is priced at $0.25, while FCCI trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYSF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.00, whereas FCCI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MLYSF's ROE is +0.79%, compared to FCCI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MLYSF and FCCI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FCCI's competition here
MLYSF vs NROM Comparison February 2026
MLYSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYSF stands at 399M. In comparison, NROM has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MLYSF is priced at $0.25, while NROM trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYSF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.00, whereas NROM's P/E ratio is 11.33. In terms of profitability, MLYSF's ROE is +0.79%, compared to NROM's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYSF is less volatile compared to NROM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYSF.Check NROM's competition here
MLYSF vs GMPR Comparison February 2026
MLYSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYSF stands at 399M. In comparison, GMPR has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MLYSF is priced at $0.25, while GMPR trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYSF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.00, whereas GMPR's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MLYSF's ROE is +0.79%, compared to GMPR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYSF is less volatile compared to GMPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYSF.Check GMPR's competition here
MLYSF vs JKHCF Comparison February 2026
MLYSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYSF stands at 399M. In comparison, JKHCF has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MLYSF is priced at $0.25, while JKHCF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYSF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.00, whereas JKHCF's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, MLYSF's ROE is +0.79%, compared to JKHCF's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYSF is less volatile compared to JKHCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYSF.Check JKHCF's competition here
MLYSF vs FATAQ Comparison February 2026
MLYSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYSF stands at 399M. In comparison, FATAQ has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MLYSF is priced at $0.25, while FATAQ trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYSF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.00, whereas FATAQ's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, MLYSF's ROE is +0.79%, compared to FATAQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MLYSF is less volatile compared to FATAQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYSF.Check FATAQ's competition here
MLYSF vs RFGPF Comparison February 2026
MLYSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYSF stands at 399M. In comparison, RFGPF has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MLYSF is priced at $0.25, while RFGPF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYSF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.00, whereas RFGPF's P/E ratio is 0.67. In terms of profitability, MLYSF's ROE is +0.79%, compared to RFGPF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYSF is less volatile compared to RFGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYSF.Check RFGPF's competition here
MLYSF vs GGLT Comparison February 2026
MLYSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYSF stands at 399M. In comparison, GGLT has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MLYSF is priced at $0.25, while GGLT trades at $200.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYSF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.00, whereas GGLT's P/E ratio is 1.33. In terms of profitability, MLYSF's ROE is +0.79%, compared to GGLT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYSF and GGLT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GGLT's competition here
MLYSF vs ODDAF Comparison February 2026
MLYSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYSF stands at 399M. In comparison, ODDAF has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MLYSF is priced at $0.25, while ODDAF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYSF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.00, whereas ODDAF's P/E ratio is -1.22. In terms of profitability, MLYSF's ROE is +0.79%, compared to ODDAF's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYSF and ODDAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ODDAF's competition here
MLYSF vs BDVB Comparison February 2026
MLYSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYSF stands at 399M. In comparison, BDVB has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MLYSF is priced at $0.25, while BDVB trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYSF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.00, whereas BDVB's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, MLYSF's ROE is +0.79%, compared to BDVB's ROE of -1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYSF and BDVB have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BDVB's competition here
MLYSF vs KITL Comparison February 2026
MLYSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYSF stands at 399M. In comparison, KITL has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MLYSF is priced at $0.25, while KITL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYSF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.00, whereas KITL's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, MLYSF's ROE is +0.79%, compared to KITL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYSF is less volatile compared to KITL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYSF.Check KITL's competition here
MLYSF vs ZAAG Comparison February 2026
MLYSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYSF stands at 399M. In comparison, ZAAG has a market cap of 952.8K. Regarding current trading prices, MLYSF is priced at $0.25, while ZAAG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYSF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.00, whereas ZAAG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MLYSF's ROE is +0.79%, compared to ZAAG's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYSF and ZAAG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ZAAG's competition here
MLYSF vs GAMN Comparison February 2026
MLYSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYSF stands at 399M. In comparison, GAMN has a market cap of 419.7K. Regarding current trading prices, MLYSF is priced at $0.25, while GAMN trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYSF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.00, whereas GAMN's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, MLYSF's ROE is +0.79%, compared to GAMN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYSF and GAMN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GAMN's competition here
MLYSF vs BLUU Comparison February 2026
MLYSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYSF stands at 399M. In comparison, BLUU has a market cap of 37.3K. Regarding current trading prices, MLYSF is priced at $0.25, while BLUU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYSF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.00, whereas BLUU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MLYSF's ROE is +0.79%, compared to BLUU's ROE of +3.93%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYSF and BLUU have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BLUU's competition here
MLYSF vs PFSF Comparison February 2026
MLYSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYSF stands at 399M. In comparison, PFSF has a market cap of 32.1K. Regarding current trading prices, MLYSF is priced at $0.25, while PFSF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYSF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.00, whereas PFSF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, MLYSF's ROE is +0.79%, compared to PFSF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYSF and PFSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PFSF's competition here
MLYSF vs GASMF Comparison February 2026
MLYSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYSF stands at 399M. In comparison, GASMF has a market cap of 29.8K. Regarding current trading prices, MLYSF is priced at $0.25, while GASMF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYSF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.00, whereas GASMF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MLYSF's ROE is +0.79%, compared to GASMF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYSF and GASMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GASMF's competition here
MLYSF vs RIBS Comparison February 2026
MLYSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYSF stands at 399M. In comparison, RIBS has a market cap of 19.5K. Regarding current trading prices, MLYSF is priced at $0.25, while RIBS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYSF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.00, whereas RIBS's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, MLYSF's ROE is +0.79%, compared to RIBS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYSF and RIBS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RIBS's competition here
MLYSF vs BBUCQ Comparison February 2026
MLYSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYSF stands at 399M. In comparison, BBUCQ has a market cap of 17.2K. Regarding current trading prices, MLYSF is priced at $0.25, while BBUCQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYSF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.00, whereas BBUCQ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MLYSF's ROE is +0.79%, compared to BBUCQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MLYSF and BBUCQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BBUCQ's competition here
MLYSF vs COFE Comparison February 2026
MLYSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYSF stands at 399M. In comparison, COFE has a market cap of 16K. Regarding current trading prices, MLYSF is priced at $0.25, while COFE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYSF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.00, whereas COFE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MLYSF's ROE is +0.79%, compared to COFE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYSF and COFE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check COFE's competition here
MLYSF vs SWRL Comparison February 2026
MLYSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYSF stands at 399M. In comparison, SWRL has a market cap of 6.6K. Regarding current trading prices, MLYSF is priced at $0.25, while SWRL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYSF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.00, whereas SWRL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MLYSF's ROE is +0.79%, compared to SWRL's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYSF and SWRL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SWRL's competition here
MLYSF vs CORG Comparison February 2026
MLYSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYSF stands at 399M. In comparison, CORG has a market cap of 2.7K. Regarding current trading prices, MLYSF is priced at $0.25, while CORG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYSF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.00, whereas CORG's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MLYSF's ROE is +0.79%, compared to CORG's ROE of +3.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYSF is less volatile compared to CORG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYSF.Check CORG's competition here
MLYSF vs AMHG Comparison February 2026
MLYSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYSF stands at 399M. In comparison, AMHG has a market cap of 1.7K. Regarding current trading prices, MLYSF is priced at $0.25, while AMHG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYSF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.00, whereas AMHG's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MLYSF's ROE is +0.79%, compared to AMHG's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYSF and AMHG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AMHG's competition here
MLYSF vs SCFFF Comparison February 2026
MLYSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYSF stands at 399M. In comparison, SCFFF has a market cap of 1.6K. Regarding current trading prices, MLYSF is priced at $0.25, while SCFFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYSF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.00, whereas SCFFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MLYSF's ROE is +0.79%, compared to SCFFF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYSF and SCFFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SCFFF's competition here
MLYSF vs GCFB Comparison February 2026
MLYSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYSF stands at 399M. In comparison, GCFB has a market cap of 1.4K. Regarding current trading prices, MLYSF is priced at $0.25, while GCFB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYSF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.00, whereas GCFB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MLYSF's ROE is +0.79%, compared to GCFB's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYSF and GCFB have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GCFB's competition here
MLYSF vs HTRE Comparison February 2026
MLYSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYSF stands at 399M. In comparison, HTRE has a market cap of 171. Regarding current trading prices, MLYSF is priced at $0.25, while HTRE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYSF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.00, whereas HTRE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MLYSF's ROE is +0.79%, compared to HTRE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MLYSF and HTRE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HTRE's competition here
MLYSF vs ULFS Comparison February 2026
MLYSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYSF stands at 399M. In comparison, ULFS has a market cap of 70. Regarding current trading prices, MLYSF is priced at $0.25, while ULFS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYSF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.00, whereas ULFS's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MLYSF's ROE is +0.79%, compared to ULFS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MLYSF and ULFS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ULFS's competition here
MLYSF vs PNSTQ Comparison February 2026
MLYSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYSF stands at 399M. In comparison, PNSTQ has a market cap of 41. Regarding current trading prices, MLYSF is priced at $0.25, while PNSTQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYSF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.00, whereas PNSTQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MLYSF's ROE is +0.79%, compared to PNSTQ's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYSF is less volatile compared to PNSTQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYSF.Check PNSTQ's competition here
MLYSF vs RKLC Comparison February 2026
MLYSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYSF stands at 399M. In comparison, RKLC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MLYSF is priced at $0.25, while RKLC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYSF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.00, whereas RKLC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MLYSF's ROE is +0.79%, compared to RKLC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MLYSF and RKLC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RKLC's competition here