Groupe Carnivor SA
Groupe Carnivor SA (MLGRC.PA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MLGRC.PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Regional Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MLGRC.PA | €15.40 | +0.00% | 36.2M | 13.75 | €1.12 | N/A |
| BNP.PA | €79.30 | +1.17% | 88.6B | 8.41 | €9.43 | +6.06% |
| ACA.PA | €16.28 | +1.24% | 49.2B | 6.99 | €2.33 | +6.75% |
| GLE.PA | €55.58 | +1.05% | 38.3B | 9.31 | €5.97 | +1.96% |
| KBC.BR | €93.04 | +0.67% | 36.9B | 10.98 | €8.47 | +3.65% |
| XBBDC.MC | €2.48 | +0.00% | 23.9B | 8.55 | €0.29 | +7.61% |
| A5G.IR | €6.78 | +3.04% | 14.5B | 7.61 | €0.89 | +5.47% |
| BIRG.IR | €12.25 | +4.03% | 11.8B | 10.29 | €1.19 | +5.22% |
| BCP.LS | €0.73 | +0.66% | 11.1B | 24.49 | €0.03 | +4.09% |
| VLK.AS | €57.00 | +0.88% | 2.4B | 18.39 | €3.10 | +7.29% |
Stock Comparison
MLGRC.PA vs BNP.PA Comparison August 2025
MLGRC.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLGRC.PA stands at 36.2M. In comparison, BNP.PA has a market cap of 88.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MLGRC.PA is priced at €15.40, while BNP.PA trades at €79.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLGRC.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.75, whereas BNP.PA's P/E ratio is 8.41. In terms of profitability, MLGRC.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BNP.PA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MLGRC.PA is less volatile compared to BNP.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLGRC.PA.Check BNP.PA's competition here
MLGRC.PA vs ACA.PA Comparison August 2025
MLGRC.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLGRC.PA stands at 36.2M. In comparison, ACA.PA has a market cap of 49.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MLGRC.PA is priced at €15.40, while ACA.PA trades at €16.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLGRC.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.75, whereas ACA.PA's P/E ratio is 6.99. In terms of profitability, MLGRC.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ACA.PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MLGRC.PA is less volatile compared to ACA.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLGRC.PA.Check ACA.PA's competition here
MLGRC.PA vs GLE.PA Comparison August 2025
MLGRC.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLGRC.PA stands at 36.2M. In comparison, GLE.PA has a market cap of 38.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MLGRC.PA is priced at €15.40, while GLE.PA trades at €55.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLGRC.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.75, whereas GLE.PA's P/E ratio is 9.31. In terms of profitability, MLGRC.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GLE.PA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MLGRC.PA is less volatile compared to GLE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLGRC.PA.Check GLE.PA's competition here
MLGRC.PA vs KBC.BR Comparison August 2025
MLGRC.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLGRC.PA stands at 36.2M. In comparison, KBC.BR has a market cap of 36.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MLGRC.PA is priced at €15.40, while KBC.BR trades at €93.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLGRC.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.75, whereas KBC.BR's P/E ratio is 10.98. In terms of profitability, MLGRC.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KBC.BR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MLGRC.PA is less volatile compared to KBC.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLGRC.PA.Check KBC.BR's competition here
MLGRC.PA vs XBBDC.MC Comparison August 2025
MLGRC.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLGRC.PA stands at 36.2M. In comparison, XBBDC.MC has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MLGRC.PA is priced at €15.40, while XBBDC.MC trades at €2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLGRC.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.75, whereas XBBDC.MC's P/E ratio is 8.55. In terms of profitability, MLGRC.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to XBBDC.MC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MLGRC.PA is less volatile compared to XBBDC.MC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLGRC.PA.Check XBBDC.MC's competition here
MLGRC.PA vs A5G.IR Comparison August 2025
MLGRC.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLGRC.PA stands at 36.2M. In comparison, A5G.IR has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MLGRC.PA is priced at €15.40, while A5G.IR trades at €6.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLGRC.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.75, whereas A5G.IR's P/E ratio is 7.61. In terms of profitability, MLGRC.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to A5G.IR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MLGRC.PA is less volatile compared to A5G.IR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLGRC.PA.Check A5G.IR's competition here
MLGRC.PA vs BIRG.IR Comparison August 2025
MLGRC.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLGRC.PA stands at 36.2M. In comparison, BIRG.IR has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MLGRC.PA is priced at €15.40, while BIRG.IR trades at €12.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLGRC.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.75, whereas BIRG.IR's P/E ratio is 10.29. In terms of profitability, MLGRC.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BIRG.IR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MLGRC.PA is less volatile compared to BIRG.IR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLGRC.PA.Check BIRG.IR's competition here
MLGRC.PA vs BCP.LS Comparison August 2025
MLGRC.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLGRC.PA stands at 36.2M. In comparison, BCP.LS has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MLGRC.PA is priced at €15.40, while BCP.LS trades at €0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLGRC.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.75, whereas BCP.LS's P/E ratio is 24.49. In terms of profitability, MLGRC.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BCP.LS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MLGRC.PA is less volatile compared to BCP.LS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLGRC.PA.Check BCP.LS's competition here
MLGRC.PA vs VLK.AS Comparison August 2025
MLGRC.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLGRC.PA stands at 36.2M. In comparison, VLK.AS has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MLGRC.PA is priced at €15.40, while VLK.AS trades at €57.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLGRC.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.75, whereas VLK.AS's P/E ratio is 18.39. In terms of profitability, MLGRC.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VLK.AS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MLGRC.PA is less volatile compared to VLK.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLGRC.PA.Check VLK.AS's competition here
MLGRC.PA vs IL0A.IR Comparison August 2025
MLGRC.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLGRC.PA stands at 36.2M. In comparison, IL0A.IR has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MLGRC.PA is priced at €15.40, while IL0A.IR trades at €2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLGRC.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.75, whereas IL0A.IR's P/E ratio is 5.34. In terms of profitability, MLGRC.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IL0A.IR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MLGRC.PA is less volatile compared to IL0A.IR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLGRC.PA.Check IL0A.IR's competition here
MLGRC.PA vs PTSB.IR Comparison August 2025
MLGRC.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLGRC.PA stands at 36.2M. In comparison, PTSB.IR has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MLGRC.PA is priced at €15.40, while PTSB.IR trades at €2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLGRC.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.75, whereas PTSB.IR's P/E ratio is 16.54. In terms of profitability, MLGRC.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PTSB.IR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MLGRC.PA is less volatile compared to PTSB.IR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLGRC.PA.Check PTSB.IR's competition here
MLGRC.PA vs MLCFM.PA Comparison August 2025
MLGRC.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLGRC.PA stands at 36.2M. In comparison, MLCFM.PA has a market cap of 830.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MLGRC.PA is priced at €15.40, while MLCFM.PA trades at €1,450.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLGRC.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.75, whereas MLCFM.PA's P/E ratio is 13.68. In terms of profitability, MLGRC.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MLCFM.PA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MLGRC.PA and MLCFM.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MLCFM.PA's competition here
MLGRC.PA vs CAF.PA Comparison August 2025
MLGRC.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLGRC.PA stands at 36.2M. In comparison, CAF.PA has a market cap of 695.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MLGRC.PA is priced at €15.40, while CAF.PA trades at €87.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLGRC.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.75, whereas CAF.PA's P/E ratio is 11.41. In terms of profitability, MLGRC.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CAF.PA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MLGRC.PA is less volatile compared to CAF.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLGRC.PA.Check CAF.PA's competition here
MLGRC.PA vs CRBP2.PA Comparison August 2025
MLGRC.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLGRC.PA stands at 36.2M. In comparison, CRBP2.PA has a market cap of 381.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MLGRC.PA is priced at €15.40, while CRBP2.PA trades at €23.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLGRC.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.75, whereas CRBP2.PA's P/E ratio is 6.39. In terms of profitability, MLGRC.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CRBP2.PA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MLGRC.PA is less volatile compared to CRBP2.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLGRC.PA.Check CRBP2.PA's competition here
MLGRC.PA vs CNF.PA Comparison August 2025
MLGRC.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLGRC.PA stands at 36.2M. In comparison, CNF.PA has a market cap of 260.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MLGRC.PA is priced at €15.40, while CNF.PA trades at €16.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLGRC.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.75, whereas CNF.PA's P/E ratio is 4.65. In terms of profitability, MLGRC.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CNF.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MLGRC.PA is less volatile compared to CNF.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLGRC.PA.Check CNF.PA's competition here
MLGRC.PA vs CIV.PA Comparison August 2025
MLGRC.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLGRC.PA stands at 36.2M. In comparison, CIV.PA has a market cap of 207M. Regarding current trading prices, MLGRC.PA is priced at €15.40, while CIV.PA trades at €92.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLGRC.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.75, whereas CIV.PA's P/E ratio is 8.64. In terms of profitability, MLGRC.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CIV.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MLGRC.PA is less volatile compared to CIV.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLGRC.PA.Check CIV.PA's competition here
MLGRC.PA vs BNB.BR Comparison August 2025
MLGRC.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLGRC.PA stands at 36.2M. In comparison, BNB.BR has a market cap of 159.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MLGRC.PA is priced at €15.40, while BNB.BR trades at €399.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLGRC.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.75, whereas BNB.BR's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, MLGRC.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BNB.BR's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MLGRC.PA is less volatile compared to BNB.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLGRC.PA.Check BNB.BR's competition here
MLGRC.PA vs CRAV.PA Comparison August 2025
MLGRC.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLGRC.PA stands at 36.2M. In comparison, CRAV.PA has a market cap of 153.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MLGRC.PA is priced at €15.40, while CRAV.PA trades at €125.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLGRC.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.75, whereas CRAV.PA's P/E ratio is 10.78. In terms of profitability, MLGRC.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CRAV.PA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MLGRC.PA is less volatile compared to CRAV.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLGRC.PA.Check CRAV.PA's competition here
MLGRC.PA vs CMO.PA Comparison August 2025
MLGRC.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLGRC.PA stands at 36.2M. In comparison, CMO.PA has a market cap of 149.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MLGRC.PA is priced at €15.40, while CMO.PA trades at €97.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLGRC.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.75, whereas CMO.PA's P/E ratio is 7.38. In terms of profitability, MLGRC.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CMO.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MLGRC.PA is less volatile compared to CMO.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLGRC.PA.Check CMO.PA's competition here
MLGRC.PA vs CAT31.PA Comparison August 2025
MLGRC.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLGRC.PA stands at 36.2M. In comparison, CAT31.PA has a market cap of 138.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MLGRC.PA is priced at €15.40, while CAT31.PA trades at €98.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLGRC.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.75, whereas CAT31.PA's P/E ratio is 6.69. In terms of profitability, MLGRC.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CAT31.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MLGRC.PA is less volatile compared to CAT31.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLGRC.PA.Check CAT31.PA's competition here
MLGRC.PA vs CRLA.PA Comparison August 2025
MLGRC.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLGRC.PA stands at 36.2M. In comparison, CRLA.PA has a market cap of 125.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MLGRC.PA is priced at €15.40, while CRLA.PA trades at €71.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLGRC.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.75, whereas CRLA.PA's P/E ratio is 7.76. In terms of profitability, MLGRC.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CRLA.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MLGRC.PA is less volatile compared to CRLA.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLGRC.PA.Check CRLA.PA's competition here
MLGRC.PA vs CCN.PA Comparison August 2025
MLGRC.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLGRC.PA stands at 36.2M. In comparison, CCN.PA has a market cap of 118M. Regarding current trading prices, MLGRC.PA is priced at €15.40, while CCN.PA trades at €112.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLGRC.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.75, whereas CCN.PA's P/E ratio is 8.57. In terms of profitability, MLGRC.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CCN.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MLGRC.PA is less volatile compared to CCN.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLGRC.PA.Check CCN.PA's competition here
MLGRC.PA vs CRTO.PA Comparison August 2025
MLGRC.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLGRC.PA stands at 36.2M. In comparison, CRTO.PA has a market cap of 117M. Regarding current trading prices, MLGRC.PA is priced at €15.40, while CRTO.PA trades at €115.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLGRC.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.75, whereas CRTO.PA's P/E ratio is 10.75. In terms of profitability, MLGRC.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CRTO.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MLGRC.PA is less volatile compared to CRTO.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLGRC.PA.Check CRTO.PA's competition here
MLGRC.PA vs CRSU.PA Comparison August 2025
MLGRC.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLGRC.PA stands at 36.2M. In comparison, CRSU.PA has a market cap of 112.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MLGRC.PA is priced at €15.40, while CRSU.PA trades at €180.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLGRC.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.75, whereas CRSU.PA's P/E ratio is 8.67. In terms of profitability, MLGRC.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CRSU.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MLGRC.PA is less volatile compared to CRSU.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLGRC.PA.Check CRSU.PA's competition here
MLGRC.PA vs CRLO.PA Comparison August 2025
MLGRC.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLGRC.PA stands at 36.2M. In comparison, CRLO.PA has a market cap of 83.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MLGRC.PA is priced at €15.40, while CRLO.PA trades at €84.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLGRC.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.75, whereas CRLO.PA's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, MLGRC.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CRLO.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MLGRC.PA is less volatile compared to CRLO.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLGRC.PA.Check CRLO.PA's competition here
MLGRC.PA vs CRAP.PA Comparison August 2025
MLGRC.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLGRC.PA stands at 36.2M. In comparison, CRAP.PA has a market cap of 78.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MLGRC.PA is priced at €15.40, while CRAP.PA trades at €113.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLGRC.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.75, whereas CRAP.PA's P/E ratio is 5.87. In terms of profitability, MLGRC.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CRAP.PA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MLGRC.PA is less volatile compared to CRAP.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLGRC.PA.Check CRAP.PA's competition here
MLGRC.PA vs KN.PA Comparison August 2025
MLGRC.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLGRC.PA stands at 36.2M. In comparison, KN.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MLGRC.PA is priced at €15.40, while KN.PA trades at €4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLGRC.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.75, whereas KN.PA's P/E ratio is 25.01. In terms of profitability, MLGRC.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KN.PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MLGRC.PA is less volatile compared to KN.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLGRC.PA.Check KN.PA's competition here