Caisse Régionale de Crédit Agricole Mutuel Brie Picardie Société coopérative
Caisse Régionale de Crédit Agricole Mutuel Brie Picardie Société coopérative (CRBP2.PA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CRBP2.PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Regional Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRBP2.PA | €32.71 | +0.68% | 458.1M | 7.13 | €4.59 | +3.52% |
| BNP.PA | €91.52 | +1.51% | 100.8B | 8.89 | €10.29 | +8.06% |
| ACA.PA | €17.31 | +1.02% | 52.4B | 7.94 | €2.18 | +6.35% |
| GLE.PA | €71.14 | +1.59% | 51.9B | 10.46 | €6.80 | +2.39% |
| KBC.BR | €113.45 | +0.71% | 45B | 13.04 | €8.70 | +2.83% |
| XBBDC.MC | €3.32 | -2.35% | 35.1B | 9.22 | €0.36 | +6.18% |
| A5G.IR | €9.61 | +2.19% | 20.4B | 10.34 | €0.93 | +6.09% |
| BIRG.IR | €16.33 | +4.35% | 15.5B | 14.20 | €1.15 | +4.29% |
| BCP.LS | €0.89 | +2.67% | 13.2B | 12.77 | €0.07 | +3.36% |
| VLK.AS | €63.95 | +0.16% | 2.7B | 18.43 | €3.47 | +6.49% |
Stock Comparison
CRBP2.PA vs BNP.PA Comparison April 2026
CRBP2.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRBP2.PA stands at 458.1M. In comparison, BNP.PA has a market cap of 100.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRBP2.PA is priced at €32.71, while BNP.PA trades at €91.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRBP2.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.13, whereas BNP.PA's P/E ratio is 8.89. In terms of profitability, CRBP2.PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BNP.PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CRBP2.PA is less volatile compared to BNP.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRBP2.PA.Check BNP.PA's competition here
CRBP2.PA vs ACA.PA Comparison April 2026
CRBP2.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRBP2.PA stands at 458.1M. In comparison, ACA.PA has a market cap of 52.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRBP2.PA is priced at €32.71, while ACA.PA trades at €17.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRBP2.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.13, whereas ACA.PA's P/E ratio is 7.94. In terms of profitability, CRBP2.PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ACA.PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRBP2.PA is less volatile compared to ACA.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRBP2.PA.Check ACA.PA's competition here
CRBP2.PA vs GLE.PA Comparison April 2026
CRBP2.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRBP2.PA stands at 458.1M. In comparison, GLE.PA has a market cap of 51.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRBP2.PA is priced at €32.71, while GLE.PA trades at €71.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRBP2.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.13, whereas GLE.PA's P/E ratio is 10.46. In terms of profitability, CRBP2.PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GLE.PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRBP2.PA is less volatile compared to GLE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRBP2.PA.Check GLE.PA's competition here
CRBP2.PA vs KBC.BR Comparison April 2026
CRBP2.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRBP2.PA stands at 458.1M. In comparison, KBC.BR has a market cap of 45B. Regarding current trading prices, CRBP2.PA is priced at €32.71, while KBC.BR trades at €113.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRBP2.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.13, whereas KBC.BR's P/E ratio is 13.04. In terms of profitability, CRBP2.PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KBC.BR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CRBP2.PA is less volatile compared to KBC.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRBP2.PA.Check KBC.BR's competition here
CRBP2.PA vs XBBDC.MC Comparison April 2026
CRBP2.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRBP2.PA stands at 458.1M. In comparison, XBBDC.MC has a market cap of 35.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRBP2.PA is priced at €32.71, while XBBDC.MC trades at €3.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRBP2.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.13, whereas XBBDC.MC's P/E ratio is 9.22. In terms of profitability, CRBP2.PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to XBBDC.MC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CRBP2.PA is more volatile compared to XBBDC.MC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRBP2.PA.Check XBBDC.MC's competition here
CRBP2.PA vs A5G.IR Comparison April 2026
CRBP2.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRBP2.PA stands at 458.1M. In comparison, A5G.IR has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRBP2.PA is priced at €32.71, while A5G.IR trades at €9.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRBP2.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.13, whereas A5G.IR's P/E ratio is 10.34. In terms of profitability, CRBP2.PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to A5G.IR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CRBP2.PA is less volatile compared to A5G.IR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRBP2.PA.Check A5G.IR's competition here
CRBP2.PA vs BIRG.IR Comparison April 2026
CRBP2.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRBP2.PA stands at 458.1M. In comparison, BIRG.IR has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRBP2.PA is priced at €32.71, while BIRG.IR trades at €16.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRBP2.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.13, whereas BIRG.IR's P/E ratio is 14.20. In terms of profitability, CRBP2.PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BIRG.IR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRBP2.PA is less volatile compared to BIRG.IR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRBP2.PA.Check BIRG.IR's competition here
CRBP2.PA vs BCP.LS Comparison April 2026
CRBP2.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRBP2.PA stands at 458.1M. In comparison, BCP.LS has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRBP2.PA is priced at €32.71, while BCP.LS trades at €0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRBP2.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.13, whereas BCP.LS's P/E ratio is 12.77. In terms of profitability, CRBP2.PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BCP.LS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CRBP2.PA is less volatile compared to BCP.LS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRBP2.PA.Check BCP.LS's competition here
CRBP2.PA vs VLK.AS Comparison April 2026
CRBP2.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRBP2.PA stands at 458.1M. In comparison, VLK.AS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRBP2.PA is priced at €32.71, while VLK.AS trades at €63.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRBP2.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.13, whereas VLK.AS's P/E ratio is 18.43. In terms of profitability, CRBP2.PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VLK.AS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRBP2.PA is more volatile compared to VLK.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRBP2.PA.Check VLK.AS's competition here
CRBP2.PA vs PTSB.IR Comparison April 2026
CRBP2.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRBP2.PA stands at 458.1M. In comparison, PTSB.IR has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRBP2.PA is priced at €32.71, while PTSB.IR trades at €2.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRBP2.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.13, whereas PTSB.IR's P/E ratio is 22.38. In terms of profitability, CRBP2.PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PTSB.IR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRBP2.PA is more volatile compared to PTSB.IR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRBP2.PA.Check PTSB.IR's competition here
CRBP2.PA vs IL0A.IR Comparison April 2026
CRBP2.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRBP2.PA stands at 458.1M. In comparison, IL0A.IR has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRBP2.PA is priced at €32.71, while IL0A.IR trades at €2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRBP2.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.13, whereas IL0A.IR's P/E ratio is 5.34. In terms of profitability, CRBP2.PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IL0A.IR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRBP2.PA is less volatile compared to IL0A.IR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRBP2.PA.Check IL0A.IR's competition here
CRBP2.PA vs CAF.PA Comparison April 2026
CRBP2.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRBP2.PA stands at 458.1M. In comparison, CAF.PA has a market cap of 919.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRBP2.PA is priced at €32.71, while CAF.PA trades at €114.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRBP2.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.13, whereas CAF.PA's P/E ratio is 13.52. In terms of profitability, CRBP2.PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CAF.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRBP2.PA is less volatile compared to CAF.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRBP2.PA.Check CAF.PA's competition here
CRBP2.PA vs MLCFM.PA Comparison April 2026
CRBP2.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRBP2.PA stands at 458.1M. In comparison, MLCFM.PA has a market cap of 744.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRBP2.PA is priced at €32.71, while MLCFM.PA trades at €1,300.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRBP2.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.13, whereas MLCFM.PA's P/E ratio is 14.95. In terms of profitability, CRBP2.PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MLCFM.PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRBP2.PA is more volatile compared to MLCFM.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRBP2.PA.Check MLCFM.PA's competition here
CRBP2.PA vs CIV.PA Comparison April 2026
CRBP2.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRBP2.PA stands at 458.1M. In comparison, CIV.PA has a market cap of 280.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRBP2.PA is priced at €32.71, while CIV.PA trades at €125.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRBP2.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.13, whereas CIV.PA's P/E ratio is 11.62. In terms of profitability, CRBP2.PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CIV.PA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRBP2.PA is less volatile compared to CIV.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRBP2.PA.Check CIV.PA's competition here
CRBP2.PA vs CNF.PA Comparison April 2026
CRBP2.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRBP2.PA stands at 458.1M. In comparison, CNF.PA has a market cap of 260.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRBP2.PA is priced at €32.71, while CNF.PA trades at €16.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRBP2.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.13, whereas CNF.PA's P/E ratio is 4.65. In terms of profitability, CRBP2.PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CNF.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRBP2.PA is more volatile compared to CNF.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRBP2.PA.Check CNF.PA's competition here
CRBP2.PA vs CMO.PA Comparison April 2026
CRBP2.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRBP2.PA stands at 458.1M. In comparison, CMO.PA has a market cap of 187M. Regarding current trading prices, CRBP2.PA is priced at €32.71, while CMO.PA trades at €120.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRBP2.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.13, whereas CMO.PA's P/E ratio is 9.15. In terms of profitability, CRBP2.PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CMO.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRBP2.PA is less volatile compared to CMO.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRBP2.PA.Check CMO.PA's competition here
CRBP2.PA vs CRAV.PA Comparison April 2026
CRBP2.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRBP2.PA stands at 458.1M. In comparison, CRAV.PA has a market cap of 184.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRBP2.PA is priced at €32.71, while CRAV.PA trades at €154.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRBP2.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.13, whereas CRAV.PA's P/E ratio is 13.30. In terms of profitability, CRBP2.PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CRAV.PA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRBP2.PA is less volatile compared to CRAV.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRBP2.PA.Check CRAV.PA's competition here
CRBP2.PA vs CAT31.PA Comparison April 2026
CRBP2.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRBP2.PA stands at 458.1M. In comparison, CAT31.PA has a market cap of 171.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRBP2.PA is priced at €32.71, while CAT31.PA trades at €127.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRBP2.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.13, whereas CAT31.PA's P/E ratio is 9.20. In terms of profitability, CRBP2.PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CAT31.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRBP2.PA is less volatile compared to CAT31.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRBP2.PA.Check CAT31.PA's competition here
CRBP2.PA vs CCN.PA Comparison April 2026
CRBP2.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRBP2.PA stands at 458.1M. In comparison, CCN.PA has a market cap of 164M. Regarding current trading prices, CRBP2.PA is priced at €32.71, while CCN.PA trades at €156.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRBP2.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.13, whereas CCN.PA's P/E ratio is 11.02. In terms of profitability, CRBP2.PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CCN.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRBP2.PA is less volatile compared to CCN.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRBP2.PA.Check CCN.PA's competition here
CRBP2.PA vs BNB.BR Comparison April 2026
CRBP2.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRBP2.PA stands at 458.1M. In comparison, BNB.BR has a market cap of 158.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRBP2.PA is priced at €32.71, while BNB.BR trades at €396.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRBP2.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.13, whereas BNB.BR's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, CRBP2.PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BNB.BR's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRBP2.PA is less volatile compared to BNB.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRBP2.PA.Check BNB.BR's competition here
CRBP2.PA vs CRLA.PA Comparison April 2026
CRBP2.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRBP2.PA stands at 458.1M. In comparison, CRLA.PA has a market cap of 152.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRBP2.PA is priced at €32.71, while CRLA.PA trades at €87.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRBP2.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.13, whereas CRLA.PA's P/E ratio is 9.04. In terms of profitability, CRBP2.PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CRLA.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRBP2.PA is less volatile compared to CRLA.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRBP2.PA.Check CRLA.PA's competition here
CRBP2.PA vs CRTO.PA Comparison April 2026
CRBP2.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRBP2.PA stands at 458.1M. In comparison, CRTO.PA has a market cap of 138.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRBP2.PA is priced at €32.71, while CRTO.PA trades at €138.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRBP2.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.13, whereas CRTO.PA's P/E ratio is 12.18. In terms of profitability, CRBP2.PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CRTO.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRBP2.PA is less volatile compared to CRTO.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRBP2.PA.Check CRTO.PA's competition here
CRBP2.PA vs CRSU.PA Comparison April 2026
CRBP2.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRBP2.PA stands at 458.1M. In comparison, CRSU.PA has a market cap of 131.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRBP2.PA is priced at €32.71, while CRSU.PA trades at €222.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRBP2.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.13, whereas CRSU.PA's P/E ratio is 9.40. In terms of profitability, CRBP2.PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CRSU.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRBP2.PA is more volatile compared to CRSU.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRBP2.PA.Check CRSU.PA's competition here
CRBP2.PA vs CRLO.PA Comparison April 2026
CRBP2.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRBP2.PA stands at 458.1M. In comparison, CRLO.PA has a market cap of 103M. Regarding current trading prices, CRBP2.PA is priced at €32.71, while CRLO.PA trades at €103.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRBP2.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.13, whereas CRLO.PA's P/E ratio is 13.15. In terms of profitability, CRBP2.PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CRLO.PA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRBP2.PA is less volatile compared to CRLO.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRBP2.PA.Check CRLO.PA's competition here
CRBP2.PA vs CRAP.PA Comparison April 2026
CRBP2.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRBP2.PA stands at 458.1M. In comparison, CRAP.PA has a market cap of 97.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRBP2.PA is priced at €32.71, while CRAP.PA trades at €143.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRBP2.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.13, whereas CRAP.PA's P/E ratio is 7.91. In terms of profitability, CRBP2.PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CRAP.PA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRBP2.PA is less volatile compared to CRAP.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRBP2.PA.Check CRAP.PA's competition here
CRBP2.PA vs MLGRC.PA Comparison April 2026
CRBP2.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRBP2.PA stands at 458.1M. In comparison, MLGRC.PA has a market cap of 56M. Regarding current trading prices, CRBP2.PA is priced at €32.71, while MLGRC.PA trades at €23.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRBP2.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.13, whereas MLGRC.PA's P/E ratio is 74.38. In terms of profitability, CRBP2.PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MLGRC.PA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRBP2.PA is more volatile compared to MLGRC.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRBP2.PA.Check MLGRC.PA's competition here
CRBP2.PA vs DD7E.IR Comparison April 2026
CRBP2.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRBP2.PA stands at 458.1M. In comparison, DD7E.IR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRBP2.PA is priced at €32.71, while DD7E.IR trades at €23.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRBP2.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.13, whereas DD7E.IR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRBP2.PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DD7E.IR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CRBP2.PA is more volatile compared to DD7E.IR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRBP2.PA.Check DD7E.IR's competition here
CRBP2.PA vs KN.PA Comparison April 2026
CRBP2.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRBP2.PA stands at 458.1M. In comparison, KN.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRBP2.PA is priced at €32.71, while KN.PA trades at €4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRBP2.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.13, whereas KN.PA's P/E ratio is 25.01. In terms of profitability, CRBP2.PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KN.PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRBP2.PA is more volatile compared to KN.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRBP2.PA.Check KN.PA's competition here