CFM Indosuez Wealth Management SA
CFM Indosuez Wealth Management SA MLCFM.PA Peers
See (MLCFM.PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Regional Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MLCFM.PA | €1,320.00 | +0.00% | 756.4M | 12.45 | €106.00 | +5.08% |
| BNP.PA | €74.88 | -2.22% | 84.6B | 7.88 | €9.50 | +6.40% |
| ACA.PA | €15.88 | -1.67% | 47.8B | 7.78 | €2.04 | +6.02% |
| KBC.BR | €87.56 | -0.59% | 34.7B | 10.34 | €8.47 | +4.68% |
| GLE.PA | €48.58 | -1.60% | 34.2B | 8.78 | €5.53 | +2.24% |
| XBBDC.MC | €2.60 | +0.78% | 25.3B | 9.63 | €0.27 | +6.20% |
| A5G.IR | €6.89 | -0.43% | 14.7B | 7.41 | €0.93 | +5.37% |
| BIRG.IR | €12.13 | -0.33% | 11.7B | 8.54 | €1.42 | +4.51% |
| BCP.LS | €0.67 | -0.03% | 10.1B | 11.11 | €0.06 | +4.50% |
| VLK.AS | €54.10 | -1.46% | 2.3B | 17.45 | €3.10 | +4.37% |
Stock Comparison
MLCFM.PA vs BNP.PA Comparison
MLCFM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLCFM.PA stands at 756.4M. In comparison, BNP.PA has a market cap of 84.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MLCFM.PA is priced at €1,320.00, while BNP.PA trades at €74.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLCFM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas BNP.PA's P/E ratio is 7.88. In terms of profitability, MLCFM.PA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BNP.PA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MLCFM.PA is less volatile compared to BNP.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLCFM.PA.
MLCFM.PA vs ACA.PA Comparison
MLCFM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLCFM.PA stands at 756.4M. In comparison, ACA.PA has a market cap of 47.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MLCFM.PA is priced at €1,320.00, while ACA.PA trades at €15.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLCFM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas ACA.PA's P/E ratio is 7.78. In terms of profitability, MLCFM.PA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ACA.PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MLCFM.PA is more volatile compared to ACA.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLCFM.PA.
MLCFM.PA vs KBC.BR Comparison
MLCFM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLCFM.PA stands at 756.4M. In comparison, KBC.BR has a market cap of 34.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MLCFM.PA is priced at €1,320.00, while KBC.BR trades at €87.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLCFM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas KBC.BR's P/E ratio is 10.34. In terms of profitability, MLCFM.PA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KBC.BR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MLCFM.PA is more volatile compared to KBC.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLCFM.PA.
MLCFM.PA vs GLE.PA Comparison
MLCFM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLCFM.PA stands at 756.4M. In comparison, GLE.PA has a market cap of 34.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MLCFM.PA is priced at €1,320.00, while GLE.PA trades at €48.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLCFM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas GLE.PA's P/E ratio is 8.78. In terms of profitability, MLCFM.PA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GLE.PA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MLCFM.PA is less volatile compared to GLE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLCFM.PA.
MLCFM.PA vs XBBDC.MC Comparison
MLCFM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLCFM.PA stands at 756.4M. In comparison, XBBDC.MC has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MLCFM.PA is priced at €1,320.00, while XBBDC.MC trades at €2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLCFM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas XBBDC.MC's P/E ratio is 9.63. In terms of profitability, MLCFM.PA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to XBBDC.MC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MLCFM.PA is more volatile compared to XBBDC.MC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLCFM.PA.
MLCFM.PA vs A5G.IR Comparison
MLCFM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLCFM.PA stands at 756.4M. In comparison, A5G.IR has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MLCFM.PA is priced at €1,320.00, while A5G.IR trades at €6.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLCFM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas A5G.IR's P/E ratio is 7.41. In terms of profitability, MLCFM.PA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to A5G.IR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MLCFM.PA is more volatile compared to A5G.IR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLCFM.PA.
MLCFM.PA vs BIRG.IR Comparison
MLCFM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLCFM.PA stands at 756.4M. In comparison, BIRG.IR has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MLCFM.PA is priced at €1,320.00, while BIRG.IR trades at €12.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLCFM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas BIRG.IR's P/E ratio is 8.54. In terms of profitability, MLCFM.PA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BIRG.IR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MLCFM.PA is more volatile compared to BIRG.IR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLCFM.PA.
MLCFM.PA vs BCP.LS Comparison
MLCFM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLCFM.PA stands at 756.4M. In comparison, BCP.LS has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MLCFM.PA is priced at €1,320.00, while BCP.LS trades at €0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLCFM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas BCP.LS's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, MLCFM.PA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BCP.LS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MLCFM.PA is more volatile compared to BCP.LS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLCFM.PA.
MLCFM.PA vs VLK.AS Comparison
MLCFM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLCFM.PA stands at 756.4M. In comparison, VLK.AS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MLCFM.PA is priced at €1,320.00, while VLK.AS trades at €54.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLCFM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas VLK.AS's P/E ratio is 17.45. In terms of profitability, MLCFM.PA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VLK.AS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MLCFM.PA is more volatile compared to VLK.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLCFM.PA.
MLCFM.PA vs IL0A.IR Comparison
MLCFM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLCFM.PA stands at 756.4M. In comparison, IL0A.IR has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MLCFM.PA is priced at €1,320.00, while IL0A.IR trades at €2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLCFM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas IL0A.IR's P/E ratio is 5.34. In terms of profitability, MLCFM.PA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IL0A.IR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MLCFM.PA is less volatile compared to IL0A.IR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLCFM.PA.
MLCFM.PA vs PTSB.IR Comparison
MLCFM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLCFM.PA stands at 756.4M. In comparison, PTSB.IR has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MLCFM.PA is priced at €1,320.00, while PTSB.IR trades at €2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLCFM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas PTSB.IR's P/E ratio is 9.41. In terms of profitability, MLCFM.PA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PTSB.IR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MLCFM.PA is more volatile compared to PTSB.IR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLCFM.PA.
MLCFM.PA vs CAF.PA Comparison
MLCFM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLCFM.PA stands at 756.4M. In comparison, CAF.PA has a market cap of 588.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MLCFM.PA is priced at €1,320.00, while CAF.PA trades at €74.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLCFM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas CAF.PA's P/E ratio is 10.71. In terms of profitability, MLCFM.PA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CAF.PA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MLCFM.PA is more volatile compared to CAF.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLCFM.PA.
MLCFM.PA vs CRBP2.PA Comparison
MLCFM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLCFM.PA stands at 756.4M. In comparison, CRBP2.PA has a market cap of 357.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MLCFM.PA is priced at €1,320.00, while CRBP2.PA trades at €22.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLCFM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas CRBP2.PA's P/E ratio is 5.99. In terms of profitability, MLCFM.PA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CRBP2.PA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MLCFM.PA is more volatile compared to CRBP2.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLCFM.PA.
MLCFM.PA vs CNF.PA Comparison
MLCFM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLCFM.PA stands at 756.4M. In comparison, CNF.PA has a market cap of 260.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MLCFM.PA is priced at €1,320.00, while CNF.PA trades at €16.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLCFM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas CNF.PA's P/E ratio is 4.65. In terms of profitability, MLCFM.PA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CNF.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MLCFM.PA is more volatile compared to CNF.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLCFM.PA.
MLCFM.PA vs CIV.PA Comparison
MLCFM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLCFM.PA stands at 756.4M. In comparison, CIV.PA has a market cap of 179.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MLCFM.PA is priced at €1,320.00, while CIV.PA trades at €80.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLCFM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas CIV.PA's P/E ratio is 7.50. In terms of profitability, MLCFM.PA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CIV.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MLCFM.PA is more volatile compared to CIV.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLCFM.PA.
MLCFM.PA vs BNB.BR Comparison
MLCFM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLCFM.PA stands at 756.4M. In comparison, BNB.BR has a market cap of 150M. Regarding current trading prices, MLCFM.PA is priced at €1,320.00, while BNB.BR trades at €375.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLCFM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas BNB.BR's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, MLCFM.PA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BNB.BR's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MLCFM.PA is more volatile compared to BNB.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLCFM.PA.
MLCFM.PA vs CAT31.PA Comparison
MLCFM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLCFM.PA stands at 756.4M. In comparison, CAT31.PA has a market cap of 125.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MLCFM.PA is priced at €1,320.00, while CAT31.PA trades at €88.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLCFM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas CAT31.PA's P/E ratio is 5.98. In terms of profitability, MLCFM.PA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CAT31.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MLCFM.PA is more volatile compared to CAT31.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLCFM.PA.
MLCFM.PA vs CMO.PA Comparison
MLCFM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLCFM.PA stands at 756.4M. In comparison, CMO.PA has a market cap of 123.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MLCFM.PA is priced at €1,320.00, while CMO.PA trades at €80.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLCFM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas CMO.PA's P/E ratio is 6.08. In terms of profitability, MLCFM.PA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CMO.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MLCFM.PA is more volatile compared to CMO.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLCFM.PA.
MLCFM.PA vs CRAV.PA Comparison
MLCFM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLCFM.PA stands at 756.4M. In comparison, CRAV.PA has a market cap of 123.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MLCFM.PA is priced at €1,320.00, while CRAV.PA trades at €101.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLCFM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas CRAV.PA's P/E ratio is 8.76. In terms of profitability, MLCFM.PA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CRAV.PA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MLCFM.PA is more volatile compared to CRAV.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLCFM.PA.
MLCFM.PA vs CRLA.PA Comparison
MLCFM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLCFM.PA stands at 756.4M. In comparison, CRLA.PA has a market cap of 106.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MLCFM.PA is priced at €1,320.00, while CRLA.PA trades at €60.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLCFM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas CRLA.PA's P/E ratio is 6.51. In terms of profitability, MLCFM.PA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CRLA.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MLCFM.PA is more volatile compared to CRLA.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLCFM.PA.
MLCFM.PA vs CCN.PA Comparison
MLCFM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLCFM.PA stands at 756.4M. In comparison, CCN.PA has a market cap of 105.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MLCFM.PA is priced at €1,320.00, while CCN.PA trades at €100.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLCFM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas CCN.PA's P/E ratio is 7.71. In terms of profitability, MLCFM.PA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CCN.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MLCFM.PA is more volatile compared to CCN.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLCFM.PA.
MLCFM.PA vs CRTO.PA Comparison
MLCFM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLCFM.PA stands at 756.4M. In comparison, CRTO.PA has a market cap of 98M. Regarding current trading prices, MLCFM.PA is priced at €1,320.00, while CRTO.PA trades at €96.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLCFM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas CRTO.PA's P/E ratio is 9.01. In terms of profitability, MLCFM.PA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CRTO.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MLCFM.PA is more volatile compared to CRTO.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLCFM.PA.
MLCFM.PA vs CRSU.PA Comparison
MLCFM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLCFM.PA stands at 756.4M. In comparison, CRSU.PA has a market cap of 96M. Regarding current trading prices, MLCFM.PA is priced at €1,320.00, while CRSU.PA trades at €153.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLCFM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas CRSU.PA's P/E ratio is 7.37. In terms of profitability, MLCFM.PA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CRSU.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MLCFM.PA is more volatile compared to CRSU.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLCFM.PA.
MLCFM.PA vs CRLO.PA Comparison
MLCFM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLCFM.PA stands at 756.4M. In comparison, CRLO.PA has a market cap of 71.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MLCFM.PA is priced at €1,320.00, while CRLO.PA trades at €72.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLCFM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas CRLO.PA's P/E ratio is 7.51. In terms of profitability, MLCFM.PA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CRLO.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MLCFM.PA is more volatile compared to CRLO.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLCFM.PA.
MLCFM.PA vs CRAP.PA Comparison
MLCFM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLCFM.PA stands at 756.4M. In comparison, CRAP.PA has a market cap of 66.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MLCFM.PA is priced at €1,320.00, while CRAP.PA trades at €97.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLCFM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas CRAP.PA's P/E ratio is 5.39. In terms of profitability, MLCFM.PA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CRAP.PA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MLCFM.PA is more volatile compared to CRAP.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLCFM.PA.
MLCFM.PA vs MLGRC.PA Comparison
MLCFM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLCFM.PA stands at 756.4M. In comparison, MLGRC.PA has a market cap of 36.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MLCFM.PA is priced at €1,320.00, while MLGRC.PA trades at €15.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLCFM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas MLGRC.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MLCFM.PA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MLGRC.PA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MLCFM.PA is more volatile compared to MLGRC.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLCFM.PA.
MLCFM.PA vs KN.PA Comparison
MLCFM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLCFM.PA stands at 756.4M. In comparison, KN.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MLCFM.PA is priced at €1,320.00, while KN.PA trades at €4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLCFM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas KN.PA's P/E ratio is 25.01. In terms of profitability, MLCFM.PA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KN.PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MLCFM.PA is more volatile compared to KN.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLCFM.PA.