Blue Shark Power System
Blue Shark Power System MLBSP.PA Peers
See (MLBSP.PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Renewable Utilities Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MLBSP.PA | $6.85 | N/A | 37.67M | 685.00 | $0.01 | N/A |
| EDPR.LS | $8.63 | +0.94% | 9.07B | -15.98 | -$0.54 | +0.97% |
| NEOEN.PA | $39.00 | N/A | 6.32B | 72.22 | $0.54 | N/A |
| GVOLT.LS | $8.22 | N/A | 1.34B | 822.00 | $0.01 | N/A |
| ELEC.PA | $150.50 | +2.38% | 1.08B | 7.67 | $19.62 | +5.71% |
| VLTSA.PA | $8.17 | -0.49% | 1.07B | -51.03 | -$0.16 | N/A |
| GRP.IR | $0.72 | N/A | 799.38M | 14.36 | $0.05 | +9.41% |
| LHYFE.PA | $3.26 | +1.24% | 156.07M | -4.94 | -$0.66 | N/A |
| ALESE.PA | $7.52 | +0.27% | 110.38M | -188.00 | -$0.04 | N/A |
| HDF.PA | $5.06 | +1.20% | 74.20M | -6.84 | -$0.74 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MLBSP.PA vs EDPR.LS Comparison
MLBSP.PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLBSP.PA stands at 37.67M. In comparison, EDPR.LS has a market cap of 9.07B. Regarding current trading prices, MLBSP.PA is priced at $6.85, while EDPR.LS trades at $8.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLBSP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 685.00, whereas EDPR.LS's P/E ratio is -15.98. In terms of profitability, MLBSP.PA's ROE is +0.32%, compared to EDPR.LS's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MLBSP.PA is less volatile compared to EDPR.LS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLBSP.PA.
MLBSP.PA vs NEOEN.PA Comparison
MLBSP.PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLBSP.PA stands at 37.67M. In comparison, NEOEN.PA has a market cap of 6.32B. Regarding current trading prices, MLBSP.PA is priced at $6.85, while NEOEN.PA trades at $39.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLBSP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 685.00, whereas NEOEN.PA's P/E ratio is 72.22. In terms of profitability, MLBSP.PA's ROE is +0.32%, compared to NEOEN.PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MLBSP.PA is less volatile compared to NEOEN.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLBSP.PA.
MLBSP.PA vs GVOLT.LS Comparison
MLBSP.PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLBSP.PA stands at 37.67M. In comparison, GVOLT.LS has a market cap of 1.34B. Regarding current trading prices, MLBSP.PA is priced at $6.85, while GVOLT.LS trades at $8.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLBSP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 685.00, whereas GVOLT.LS's P/E ratio is 822.00. In terms of profitability, MLBSP.PA's ROE is +0.32%, compared to GVOLT.LS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MLBSP.PA and GVOLT.LS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MLBSP.PA vs ELEC.PA Comparison
MLBSP.PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLBSP.PA stands at 37.67M. In comparison, ELEC.PA has a market cap of 1.08B. Regarding current trading prices, MLBSP.PA is priced at $6.85, while ELEC.PA trades at $150.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLBSP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 685.00, whereas ELEC.PA's P/E ratio is 7.67. In terms of profitability, MLBSP.PA's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ELEC.PA's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MLBSP.PA is less volatile compared to ELEC.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLBSP.PA.
MLBSP.PA vs VLTSA.PA Comparison
MLBSP.PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLBSP.PA stands at 37.67M. In comparison, VLTSA.PA has a market cap of 1.07B. Regarding current trading prices, MLBSP.PA is priced at $6.85, while VLTSA.PA trades at $8.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLBSP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 685.00, whereas VLTSA.PA's P/E ratio is -51.03. In terms of profitability, MLBSP.PA's ROE is +0.32%, compared to VLTSA.PA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MLBSP.PA is less volatile compared to VLTSA.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLBSP.PA.
MLBSP.PA vs GRP.IR Comparison
MLBSP.PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLBSP.PA stands at 37.67M. In comparison, GRP.IR has a market cap of 799.38M. Regarding current trading prices, MLBSP.PA is priced at $6.85, while GRP.IR trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLBSP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 685.00, whereas GRP.IR's P/E ratio is 14.36. In terms of profitability, MLBSP.PA's ROE is +0.32%, compared to GRP.IR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MLBSP.PA is less volatile compared to GRP.IR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLBSP.PA.
MLBSP.PA vs LHYFE.PA Comparison
MLBSP.PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLBSP.PA stands at 37.67M. In comparison, LHYFE.PA has a market cap of 156.07M. Regarding current trading prices, MLBSP.PA is priced at $6.85, while LHYFE.PA trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLBSP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 685.00, whereas LHYFE.PA's P/E ratio is -4.94. In terms of profitability, MLBSP.PA's ROE is +0.32%, compared to LHYFE.PA's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MLBSP.PA is less volatile compared to LHYFE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLBSP.PA.
MLBSP.PA vs ALESE.PA Comparison
MLBSP.PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLBSP.PA stands at 37.67M. In comparison, ALESE.PA has a market cap of 110.38M. Regarding current trading prices, MLBSP.PA is priced at $6.85, while ALESE.PA trades at $7.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLBSP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 685.00, whereas ALESE.PA's P/E ratio is -188.00. In terms of profitability, MLBSP.PA's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ALESE.PA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MLBSP.PA is less volatile compared to ALESE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLBSP.PA.
MLBSP.PA vs HDF.PA Comparison
MLBSP.PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLBSP.PA stands at 37.67M. In comparison, HDF.PA has a market cap of 74.20M. Regarding current trading prices, MLBSP.PA is priced at $6.85, while HDF.PA trades at $5.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLBSP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 685.00, whereas HDF.PA's P/E ratio is -6.84. In terms of profitability, MLBSP.PA's ROE is +0.32%, compared to HDF.PA's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MLBSP.PA is less volatile compared to HDF.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLBSP.PA.
MLBSP.PA vs MLECO.PA Comparison
MLBSP.PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLBSP.PA stands at 37.67M. In comparison, MLECO.PA has a market cap of 35.50M. Regarding current trading prices, MLBSP.PA is priced at $6.85, while MLECO.PA trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLBSP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 685.00, whereas MLECO.PA's P/E ratio is -125.00. In terms of profitability, MLBSP.PA's ROE is +0.32%, compared to MLECO.PA's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MLBSP.PA and MLECO.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MLBSP.PA vs MLCMG.PA Comparison
MLBSP.PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLBSP.PA stands at 37.67M. In comparison, MLCMG.PA has a market cap of 27.56M. Regarding current trading prices, MLBSP.PA is priced at $6.85, while MLCMG.PA trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLBSP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 685.00, whereas MLCMG.PA's P/E ratio is -9.13. In terms of profitability, MLBSP.PA's ROE is +0.32%, compared to MLCMG.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MLBSP.PA is less volatile compared to MLCMG.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLBSP.PA.
MLBSP.PA vs ALHAF.PA Comparison
MLBSP.PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLBSP.PA stands at 37.67M. In comparison, ALHAF.PA has a market cap of 18.39M. Regarding current trading prices, MLBSP.PA is priced at $6.85, while ALHAF.PA trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLBSP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 685.00, whereas ALHAF.PA's P/E ratio is -1.29. In terms of profitability, MLBSP.PA's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ALHAF.PA's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MLBSP.PA is less volatile compared to ALHAF.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLBSP.PA.
MLBSP.PA vs ALCWE.PA Comparison
MLBSP.PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLBSP.PA stands at 37.67M. In comparison, ALCWE.PA has a market cap of 16.58M. Regarding current trading prices, MLBSP.PA is priced at $6.85, while ALCWE.PA trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLBSP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 685.00, whereas ALCWE.PA's P/E ratio is -4.78. In terms of profitability, MLBSP.PA's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ALCWE.PA's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MLBSP.PA is less volatile compared to ALCWE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLBSP.PA.
MLBSP.PA vs ALOKW.PA Comparison
MLBSP.PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLBSP.PA stands at 37.67M. In comparison, ALOKW.PA has a market cap of 13.94M. Regarding current trading prices, MLBSP.PA is priced at $6.85, while ALOKW.PA trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLBSP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 685.00, whereas ALOKW.PA's P/E ratio is -3.84. In terms of profitability, MLBSP.PA's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ALOKW.PA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MLBSP.PA is less volatile compared to ALOKW.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLBSP.PA.
MLBSP.PA vs ALAGO.PA Comparison
MLBSP.PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLBSP.PA stands at 37.67M. In comparison, ALAGO.PA has a market cap of 4.16M. Regarding current trading prices, MLBSP.PA is priced at $6.85, while ALAGO.PA trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLBSP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 685.00, whereas ALAGO.PA's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, MLBSP.PA's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ALAGO.PA's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, MLBSP.PA is less volatile compared to ALAGO.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLBSP.PA.
MLBSP.PA vs ALAGP.PA Comparison
MLBSP.PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLBSP.PA stands at 37.67M. In comparison, ALAGP.PA has a market cap of 3.91M. Regarding current trading prices, MLBSP.PA is priced at $6.85, while ALAGP.PA trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLBSP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 685.00, whereas ALAGP.PA's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, MLBSP.PA's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ALAGP.PA's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, MLBSP.PA is less volatile compared to ALAGP.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLBSP.PA.
MLBSP.PA vs NSE.AS Comparison
MLBSP.PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLBSP.PA stands at 37.67M. In comparison, NSE.AS has a market cap of 1.45M. Regarding current trading prices, MLBSP.PA is priced at $6.85, while NSE.AS trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLBSP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 685.00, whereas NSE.AS's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, MLBSP.PA's ROE is +0.32%, compared to NSE.AS's ROE of +1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, MLBSP.PA and NSE.AS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MLBSP.PA vs MLEES.PA Comparison
MLBSP.PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLBSP.PA stands at 37.67M. In comparison, MLEES.PA has a market cap of 285756.00. Regarding current trading prices, MLBSP.PA is priced at $6.85, while MLEES.PA trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLBSP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 685.00, whereas MLEES.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MLBSP.PA's ROE is +0.32%, compared to MLEES.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MLBSP.PA and MLEES.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MLBSP.PA vs ARVEN.PA Comparison
MLBSP.PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLBSP.PA stands at 37.67M. In comparison, ARVEN.PA has a market cap of 86628.00. Regarding current trading prices, MLBSP.PA is priced at $6.85, while ARVEN.PA trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLBSP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 685.00, whereas ARVEN.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MLBSP.PA's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ARVEN.PA's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, MLBSP.PA is less volatile compared to ARVEN.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLBSP.PA.
MLBSP.PA vs ABIO.PA Comparison
MLBSP.PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLBSP.PA stands at 37.67M. In comparison, ABIO.PA has a market cap of N/A. Regarding current trading prices, MLBSP.PA is priced at $6.85, while ABIO.PA trades at $47.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLBSP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 685.00, whereas ABIO.PA's P/E ratio is 26.94. In terms of profitability, MLBSP.PA's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ABIO.PA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MLBSP.PA is less volatile compared to ABIO.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLBSP.PA.