Marimekko Oyj
Marimekko Oyj MKKOF Peers
See (MKKOF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Manufacturers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MKKOF | $12.96 | +0.00% | 525.8M | 19.34 | $0.67 | +2.22% |
| HNNMY | $2.77 | -0.05% | 113.6B | 21.23 | $0.13 | +4.76% |
| HMRZF | $13.54 | +0.00% | 21.7B | 20.83 | $0.65 | +4.81% |
| MONRF | $61.14 | +0.00% | 16.5B | 22.56 | $2.71 | +2.39% |
| MONRY | $55.78 | +1.03% | 15.1B | 20.61 | $2.71 | +2.64% |
| SZHIF | $7.65 | +0.00% | 11.5B | 15.61 | $0.49 | +4.25% |
| TRYIY | $13.56 | +0.37% | 10.6B | 19.93 | $0.68 | +1.02% |
| TRYIF | $6.66 | +0.00% | 10.4B | 19.59 | $0.34 | +1.83% |
| SHZHY | $6.75 | -1.17% | 10.3B | 17.18 | $0.40 | +4.73% |
| LPPSY | $20.41 | +0.00% | 7.6B | 18.39 | $1.11 | +1.10% |
Stock Comparison
MKKOF vs HNNMY Comparison
MKKOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKOF stands at 525.8M. In comparison, HNNMY has a market cap of 113.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKOF is priced at $12.96, while HNNMY trades at $2.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKOF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas HNNMY's P/E ratio is 21.23. In terms of profitability, MKKOF's ROE is +0.36%, compared to HNNMY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKOF is more volatile compared to HNNMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKOF.
MKKOF vs HMRZF Comparison
MKKOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKOF stands at 525.8M. In comparison, HMRZF has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKOF is priced at $12.96, while HMRZF trades at $13.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKOF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas HMRZF's P/E ratio is 20.83. In terms of profitability, MKKOF's ROE is +0.36%, compared to HMRZF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKOF is less volatile compared to HMRZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKOF.
MKKOF vs MONRF Comparison
MKKOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKOF stands at 525.8M. In comparison, MONRF has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKOF is priced at $12.96, while MONRF trades at $61.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKOF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas MONRF's P/E ratio is 22.56. In terms of profitability, MKKOF's ROE is +0.36%, compared to MONRF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKOF is more volatile compared to MONRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKOF.
MKKOF vs MONRY Comparison
MKKOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKOF stands at 525.8M. In comparison, MONRY has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKOF is priced at $12.96, while MONRY trades at $55.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKOF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas MONRY's P/E ratio is 20.61. In terms of profitability, MKKOF's ROE is +0.36%, compared to MONRY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKOF is more volatile compared to MONRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKOF.
MKKOF vs SZHIF Comparison
MKKOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKOF stands at 525.8M. In comparison, SZHIF has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKOF is priced at $12.96, while SZHIF trades at $7.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKOF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas SZHIF's P/E ratio is 15.61. In terms of profitability, MKKOF's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SZHIF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKOF is more volatile compared to SZHIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKOF.
MKKOF vs TRYIY Comparison
MKKOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKOF stands at 525.8M. In comparison, TRYIY has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKOF is priced at $12.96, while TRYIY trades at $13.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKOF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas TRYIY's P/E ratio is 19.93. In terms of profitability, MKKOF's ROE is +0.36%, compared to TRYIY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKOF is more volatile compared to TRYIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKOF.
MKKOF vs TRYIF Comparison
MKKOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKOF stands at 525.8M. In comparison, TRYIF has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKOF is priced at $12.96, while TRYIF trades at $6.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKOF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas TRYIF's P/E ratio is 19.59. In terms of profitability, MKKOF's ROE is +0.36%, compared to TRYIF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKOF is more volatile compared to TRYIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKOF.
MKKOF vs SHZHY Comparison
MKKOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKOF stands at 525.8M. In comparison, SHZHY has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKOF is priced at $12.96, while SHZHY trades at $6.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKOF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas SHZHY's P/E ratio is 17.18. In terms of profitability, MKKOF's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SHZHY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKOF is more volatile compared to SHZHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKOF.
MKKOF vs LPPSY Comparison
MKKOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKOF stands at 525.8M. In comparison, LPPSY has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKOF is priced at $12.96, while LPPSY trades at $20.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKOF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas LPPSY's P/E ratio is 18.39. In terms of profitability, MKKOF's ROE is +0.36%, compared to LPPSY's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKOF is more volatile compared to LPPSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKOF.
MKKOF vs BSDGY Comparison
MKKOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKOF stands at 525.8M. In comparison, BSDGY has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKOF is priced at $12.96, while BSDGY trades at $28.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKOF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas BSDGY's P/E ratio is 13.26. In terms of profitability, MKKOF's ROE is +0.36%, compared to BSDGY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKOF is more volatile compared to BSDGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKOF.
MKKOF vs BSDGF Comparison
MKKOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKOF stands at 525.8M. In comparison, BSDGF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKOF is priced at $12.96, while BSDGF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKOF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas BSDGF's P/E ratio is 13.59. In terms of profitability, MKKOF's ROE is +0.36%, compared to BSDGF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKOF is more volatile compared to BSDGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKOF.
MKKOF vs RYPPF Comparison
MKKOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKOF stands at 525.8M. In comparison, RYPPF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKOF is priced at $12.96, while RYPPF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKOF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas RYPPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKKOF's ROE is +0.36%, compared to RYPPF's ROE of +1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKOF is less volatile compared to RYPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKOF.
MKKOF vs BOSSY Comparison
MKKOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKOF stands at 525.8M. In comparison, BOSSY has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKOF is priced at $12.96, while BOSSY trades at $9.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKOF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas BOSSY's P/E ratio is 13.32. In terms of profitability, MKKOF's ROE is +0.36%, compared to BOSSY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKOF is more volatile compared to BOSSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKOF.
MKKOF vs CGGGF Comparison
MKKOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKOF stands at 525.8M. In comparison, CGGGF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKOF is priced at $12.96, while CGGGF trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKOF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas CGGGF's P/E ratio is 22.15. In terms of profitability, MKKOF's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CGGGF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKOF is more volatile compared to CGGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKOF.
MKKOF vs WACLY Comparison
MKKOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKOF stands at 525.8M. In comparison, WACLY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKOF is priced at $12.96, while WACLY trades at $166.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKOF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas WACLY's P/E ratio is 37.58. In terms of profitability, MKKOF's ROE is +0.36%, compared to WACLY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKOF is more volatile compared to WACLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKOF.
MKKOF vs DELTF Comparison
MKKOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKOF stands at 525.8M. In comparison, DELTF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKOF is priced at $12.96, while DELTF trades at $50.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKOF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas DELTF's P/E ratio is 14.20. In terms of profitability, MKKOF's ROE is +0.36%, compared to DELTF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKOF is more volatile compared to DELTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKOF.
MKKOF vs SERNF Comparison
MKKOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKOF stands at 525.8M. In comparison, SERNF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKOF is priced at $12.96, while SERNF trades at $17.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKOF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas SERNF's P/E ratio is 10.73. In terms of profitability, MKKOF's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SERNF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKOF is more volatile compared to SERNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKOF.
MKKOF vs JNBYF Comparison
MKKOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKOF stands at 525.8M. In comparison, JNBYF has a market cap of 784.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKOF is priced at $12.96, while JNBYF trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKOF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas JNBYF's P/E ratio is 6.33. In terms of profitability, MKKOF's ROE is +0.36%, compared to JNBYF's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKOF is less volatile compared to JNBYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKOF.
MKKOF vs WACLF Comparison
MKKOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKOF stands at 525.8M. In comparison, WACLF has a market cap of 780.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKOF is priced at $12.96, while WACLF trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKOF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas WACLF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, MKKOF's ROE is +0.36%, compared to WACLF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKOF is less volatile compared to WACLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKOF.
MKKOF vs JWTXF Comparison
MKKOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKOF stands at 525.8M. In comparison, JWTXF has a market cap of 517.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKOF is priced at $12.96, while JWTXF trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKOF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas JWTXF's P/E ratio is 8.83. In terms of profitability, MKKOF's ROE is +0.36%, compared to JWTXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKOF is more volatile compared to JWTXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKOF.
MKKOF vs TSIHF Comparison
MKKOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKOF stands at 525.8M. In comparison, TSIHF has a market cap of 473M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKOF is priced at $12.96, while TSIHF trades at $7.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKOF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas TSIHF's P/E ratio is 4.93. In terms of profitability, MKKOF's ROE is +0.36%, compared to TSIHF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKOF is less volatile compared to TSIHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKOF.
MKKOF vs VDEVF Comparison
MKKOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKOF stands at 525.8M. In comparison, VDEVF has a market cap of 441.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKOF is priced at $12.96, while VDEVF trades at $35.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKOF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas VDEVF's P/E ratio is 12.65. In terms of profitability, MKKOF's ROE is +0.36%, compared to VDEVF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKOF is more volatile compared to VDEVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKOF.
MKKOF vs CDGXY Comparison
MKKOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKOF stands at 525.8M. In comparison, CDGXY has a market cap of 330.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKOF is priced at $12.96, while CDGXY trades at $2.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKOF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas CDGXY's P/E ratio is 11.28. In terms of profitability, MKKOF's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CDGXY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKOF is more volatile compared to CDGXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKOF.
MKKOF vs CDGXF Comparison
MKKOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKOF stands at 525.8M. In comparison, CDGXF has a market cap of 175.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKOF is priced at $12.96, while CDGXF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKOF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas CDGXF's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, MKKOF's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CDGXF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKOF is less volatile compared to CDGXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKOF.
MKKOF vs WQTEF Comparison
MKKOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKOF stands at 525.8M. In comparison, WQTEF has a market cap of 167.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKOF is priced at $12.96, while WQTEF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKOF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas WQTEF's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, MKKOF's ROE is +0.36%, compared to WQTEF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKOF is less volatile compared to WQTEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKOF.
MKKOF vs ECNLF Comparison
MKKOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKOF stands at 525.8M. In comparison, ECNLF has a market cap of 138M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKOF is priced at $12.96, while ECNLF trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKOF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas ECNLF's P/E ratio is -5.71. In terms of profitability, MKKOF's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ECNLF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKOF is more volatile compared to ECNLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKOF.
MKKOF vs CHRLF Comparison
MKKOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKOF stands at 525.8M. In comparison, CHRLF has a market cap of 84.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKOF is priced at $12.96, while CHRLF trades at $5.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKOF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas CHRLF's P/E ratio is 8.17. In terms of profitability, MKKOF's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CHRLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MKKOF is more volatile compared to CHRLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKOF.
MKKOF vs TFRFF Comparison
MKKOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKOF stands at 525.8M. In comparison, TFRFF has a market cap of 82.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKOF is priced at $12.96, while TFRFF trades at $6.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKOF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas TFRFF's P/E ratio is 6.87. In terms of profitability, MKKOF's ROE is +0.36%, compared to TFRFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKOF is more volatile compared to TFRFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKOF.
MKKOF vs NLLGF Comparison
MKKOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKOF stands at 525.8M. In comparison, NLLGF has a market cap of 67M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKOF is priced at $12.96, while NLLGF trades at $5.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKOF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas NLLGF's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, MKKOF's ROE is +0.36%, compared to NLLGF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKOF is more volatile compared to NLLGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKOF.
MKKOF vs TAPCF Comparison
MKKOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKOF stands at 525.8M. In comparison, TAPCF has a market cap of 42.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKOF is priced at $12.96, while TAPCF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKOF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas TAPCF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, MKKOF's ROE is +0.36%, compared to TAPCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MKKOF is more volatile compared to TAPCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKOF.
MKKOF vs IFABF Comparison
MKKOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKOF stands at 525.8M. In comparison, IFABF has a market cap of 23.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKOF is priced at $12.96, while IFABF trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKOF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas IFABF's P/E ratio is 25.69. In terms of profitability, MKKOF's ROE is +0.36%, compared to IFABF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKOF is more volatile compared to IFABF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKOF.
MKKOF vs USYNF Comparison
MKKOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKOF stands at 525.8M. In comparison, USYNF has a market cap of 16.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKOF is priced at $12.96, while USYNF trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKOF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas USYNF's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, MKKOF's ROE is +0.36%, compared to USYNF's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKOF is more volatile compared to USYNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKOF.
MKKOF vs TUGHF Comparison
MKKOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKOF stands at 525.8M. In comparison, TUGHF has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKOF is priced at $12.96, while TUGHF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKOF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas TUGHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKKOF's ROE is +0.36%, compared to TUGHF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKOF is less volatile compared to TUGHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKOF.
MKKOF vs SEPGY Comparison
MKKOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKOF stands at 525.8M. In comparison, SEPGY has a market cap of 8.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKOF is priced at $12.96, while SEPGY trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKOF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas SEPGY's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, MKKOF's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SEPGY's ROE of -6.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKOF is more volatile compared to SEPGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKOF.
MKKOF vs SEPGF Comparison
MKKOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKOF stands at 525.8M. In comparison, SEPGF has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKOF is priced at $12.96, while SEPGF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKOF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas SEPGF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, MKKOF's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SEPGF's ROE of -4.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKOF is less volatile compared to SEPGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKOF.
MKKOF vs AVLP Comparison
MKKOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKOF stands at 525.8M. In comparison, AVLP has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKOF is priced at $12.96, while AVLP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKOF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas AVLP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKKOF's ROE is +0.36%, compared to AVLP's ROE of +2.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKOF is more volatile compared to AVLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKOF.
MKKOF vs TALN Comparison
MKKOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKOF stands at 525.8M. In comparison, TALN has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKOF is priced at $12.96, while TALN trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKOF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas TALN's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, MKKOF's ROE is +0.36%, compared to TALN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKOF is less volatile compared to TALN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKOF.
MKKOF vs AHRO Comparison
MKKOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKOF stands at 525.8M. In comparison, AHRO has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKOF is priced at $12.96, while AHRO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKOF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas AHRO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKKOF's ROE is +0.36%, compared to AHRO's ROE of +1.68%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKOF is more volatile compared to AHRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKOF.
MKKOF vs JLMC Comparison
MKKOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKOF stands at 525.8M. In comparison, JLMC has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKOF is priced at $12.96, while JLMC trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKOF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas JLMC's P/E ratio is 23.75. In terms of profitability, MKKOF's ROE is +0.36%, compared to JLMC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKOF is more volatile compared to JLMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKOF.
MKKOF vs CGAC Comparison
MKKOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKOF stands at 525.8M. In comparison, CGAC has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKOF is priced at $12.96, while CGAC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKOF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas CGAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKKOF's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CGAC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKOF is less volatile compared to CGAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKOF.
MKKOF vs BLFR Comparison
MKKOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKOF stands at 525.8M. In comparison, BLFR has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKOF is priced at $12.96, while BLFR trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKOF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas BLFR's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, MKKOF's ROE is +0.36%, compared to BLFR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKOF is less volatile compared to BLFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKOF.
MKKOF vs PBBSF Comparison
MKKOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKOF stands at 525.8M. In comparison, PBBSF has a market cap of 907.8K. Regarding current trading prices, MKKOF is priced at $12.96, while PBBSF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKOF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas PBBSF's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, MKKOF's ROE is +0.36%, compared to PBBSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MKKOF is more volatile compared to PBBSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKOF.
MKKOF vs SKFG Comparison
MKKOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKOF stands at 525.8M. In comparison, SKFG has a market cap of 550.3K. Regarding current trading prices, MKKOF is priced at $12.96, while SKFG trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKOF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas SKFG's P/E ratio is -5.53. In terms of profitability, MKKOF's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SKFG's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKOF is more volatile compared to SKFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKOF.
MKKOF vs SUUB Comparison
MKKOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKOF stands at 525.8M. In comparison, SUUB has a market cap of 81.2K. Regarding current trading prices, MKKOF is priced at $12.96, while SUUB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKOF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas SUUB's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, MKKOF's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SUUB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MKKOF is less volatile compared to SUUB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKOF.
MKKOF vs AGNY Comparison
MKKOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKOF stands at 525.8M. In comparison, AGNY has a market cap of 72K. Regarding current trading prices, MKKOF is priced at $12.96, while AGNY trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKOF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas AGNY's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, MKKOF's ROE is +0.36%, compared to AGNY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKOF is more volatile compared to AGNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKOF.
MKKOF vs CIND Comparison
MKKOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKOF stands at 525.8M. In comparison, CIND has a market cap of 57.6K. Regarding current trading prices, MKKOF is priced at $12.96, while CIND trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKOF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas CIND's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKKOF's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CIND's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MKKOF is less volatile compared to CIND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKOF.
MKKOF vs CRTL Comparison
MKKOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKOF stands at 525.8M. In comparison, CRTL has a market cap of 26.1K. Regarding current trading prices, MKKOF is priced at $12.96, while CRTL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKOF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas CRTL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKKOF's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CRTL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKOF is more volatile compared to CRTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKOF.
MKKOF vs OMVE Comparison
MKKOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKOF stands at 525.8M. In comparison, OMVE has a market cap of 15.5K. Regarding current trading prices, MKKOF is priced at $12.96, while OMVE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKOF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas OMVE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MKKOF's ROE is +0.36%, compared to OMVE's ROE of +7.54%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKOF is less volatile compared to OMVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKOF.
MKKOF vs LYJN Comparison
MKKOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKOF stands at 525.8M. In comparison, LYJN has a market cap of 9.9K. Regarding current trading prices, MKKOF is priced at $12.96, while LYJN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKOF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas LYJN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MKKOF's ROE is +0.36%, compared to LYJN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MKKOF is less volatile compared to LYJN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKOF.
MKKOF vs TRUA Comparison
MKKOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKOF stands at 525.8M. In comparison, TRUA has a market cap of 6.9K. Regarding current trading prices, MKKOF is priced at $12.96, while TRUA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKOF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas TRUA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKKOF's ROE is +0.36%, compared to TRUA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MKKOF is less volatile compared to TRUA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKOF.
MKKOF vs EDSFF Comparison
MKKOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKOF stands at 525.8M. In comparison, EDSFF has a market cap of 3.3K. Regarding current trading prices, MKKOF is priced at $12.96, while EDSFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKOF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas EDSFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKKOF's ROE is +0.36%, compared to EDSFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKOF is less volatile compared to EDSFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKOF.
MKKOF vs APPM Comparison
MKKOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKOF stands at 525.8M. In comparison, APPM has a market cap of 2.8K. Regarding current trading prices, MKKOF is priced at $12.96, while APPM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKOF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas APPM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKKOF's ROE is +0.36%, compared to APPM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MKKOF is more volatile compared to APPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKOF.
MKKOF vs IBGR Comparison
MKKOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKOF stands at 525.8M. In comparison, IBGR has a market cap of 2K. Regarding current trading prices, MKKOF is priced at $12.96, while IBGR trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKOF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas IBGR's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, MKKOF's ROE is +0.36%, compared to IBGR's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKOF is less volatile compared to IBGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKOF.
MKKOF vs LZENF Comparison
MKKOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKOF stands at 525.8M. In comparison, LZENF has a market cap of 1.4K. Regarding current trading prices, MKKOF is priced at $12.96, while LZENF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKOF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas LZENF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKKOF's ROE is +0.36%, compared to LZENF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKOF is more volatile compared to LZENF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKOF.
MKKOF vs SSTU Comparison
MKKOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKOF stands at 525.8M. In comparison, SSTU has a market cap of 897. Regarding current trading prices, MKKOF is priced at $12.96, while SSTU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKOF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas SSTU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKKOF's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SSTU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MKKOF is less volatile compared to SSTU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKOF.
MKKOF vs SUFF Comparison
MKKOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKOF stands at 525.8M. In comparison, SUFF has a market cap of 69. Regarding current trading prices, MKKOF is priced at $12.96, while SUFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKOF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas SUFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKKOF's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SUFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MKKOF is more volatile compared to SUFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKOF.
MKKOF vs WLFDY Comparison
MKKOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKOF stands at 525.8M. In comparison, WLFDY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MKKOF is priced at $12.96, while WLFDY trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKOF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas WLFDY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKKOF's ROE is +0.36%, compared to WLFDY's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKOF is more volatile compared to WLFDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKOF.
MKKOF vs JKRO Comparison
MKKOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKOF stands at 525.8M. In comparison, JKRO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MKKOF is priced at $12.96, while JKRO trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKOF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas JKRO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKKOF's ROE is +0.36%, compared to JKRO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKOF is more volatile compared to JKRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKOF.
MKKOF vs GLLHF Comparison
MKKOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKOF stands at 525.8M. In comparison, GLLHF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MKKOF is priced at $12.96, while GLLHF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKOF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas GLLHF's P/E ratio is 12.25. In terms of profitability, MKKOF's ROE is +0.36%, compared to GLLHF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MKKOF is more volatile compared to GLLHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKOF.