MIC Electronics Limited
MIC Electronics Limited (MICEL.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MICEL.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MICEL.NS | ₹31.69 | -3.41% | 7.5B | 82.39 | ₹0.38 | N/A |
| POWERINDIA.NS | ₹24,860.00 | -0.66% | 1.1T | 127.53 | ₹190.19 | +0.02% |
| POWERINDIA.BO | ₹24,750.00 | -1.13% | 1.1T | 127.45 | ₹190.25 | +0.02% |
| SYRMA.BO | ₹763.50 | -2.41% | 143.8B | 48.68 | ₹15.33 | +0.20% |
| SYRMA.NS | ₹767.05 | +1.21% | 143.7B | 48.79 | ₹15.29 | +0.20% |
| PGEL.NS | ₹489.55 | -4.52% | 140.8B | 50.53 | ₹9.79 | +0.05% |
| PGEL.BO | ₹488.80 | -4.67% | 140.8B | 50.53 | ₹9.79 | +0.05% |
| AVALON.NS | ₹915.70 | -3.80% | 59.1B | 61.60 | ₹14.37 | N/A |
| AVALON.BO | ₹909.30 | -4.55% | 59B | 61.43 | ₹14.39 | N/A |
| KRN.NS | ₹871.45 | -2.83% | 52.7B | 77.51 | ₹10.94 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MICEL.NS vs POWERINDIA.NS Comparison March 2026
MICEL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICEL.NS stands at 7.5B. In comparison, POWERINDIA.NS has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, MICEL.NS is priced at ₹31.69, while POWERINDIA.NS trades at ₹24,860.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.39, whereas POWERINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 127.53. In terms of profitability, MICEL.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to POWERINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MICEL.NS is more volatile compared to POWERINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICEL.NS.Check POWERINDIA.NS's competition here
MICEL.NS vs POWERINDIA.BO Comparison March 2026
MICEL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICEL.NS stands at 7.5B. In comparison, POWERINDIA.BO has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, MICEL.NS is priced at ₹31.69, while POWERINDIA.BO trades at ₹24,750.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.39, whereas POWERINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 127.45. In terms of profitability, MICEL.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to POWERINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MICEL.NS is more volatile compared to POWERINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICEL.NS.Check POWERINDIA.BO's competition here
MICEL.NS vs SYRMA.BO Comparison March 2026
MICEL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICEL.NS stands at 7.5B. In comparison, SYRMA.BO has a market cap of 143.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MICEL.NS is priced at ₹31.69, while SYRMA.BO trades at ₹763.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.39, whereas SYRMA.BO's P/E ratio is 48.68. In terms of profitability, MICEL.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SYRMA.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MICEL.NS is more volatile compared to SYRMA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICEL.NS.Check SYRMA.BO's competition here
MICEL.NS vs SYRMA.NS Comparison March 2026
MICEL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICEL.NS stands at 7.5B. In comparison, SYRMA.NS has a market cap of 143.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MICEL.NS is priced at ₹31.69, while SYRMA.NS trades at ₹767.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.39, whereas SYRMA.NS's P/E ratio is 48.79. In terms of profitability, MICEL.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SYRMA.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MICEL.NS is more volatile compared to SYRMA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICEL.NS.Check SYRMA.NS's competition here
MICEL.NS vs PGEL.NS Comparison March 2026
MICEL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICEL.NS stands at 7.5B. In comparison, PGEL.NS has a market cap of 140.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MICEL.NS is priced at ₹31.69, while PGEL.NS trades at ₹489.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.39, whereas PGEL.NS's P/E ratio is 50.53. In terms of profitability, MICEL.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PGEL.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MICEL.NS is less volatile compared to PGEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICEL.NS.Check PGEL.NS's competition here
MICEL.NS vs PGEL.BO Comparison March 2026
MICEL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICEL.NS stands at 7.5B. In comparison, PGEL.BO has a market cap of 140.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MICEL.NS is priced at ₹31.69, while PGEL.BO trades at ₹488.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.39, whereas PGEL.BO's P/E ratio is 50.53. In terms of profitability, MICEL.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PGEL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MICEL.NS is less volatile compared to PGEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICEL.NS.Check PGEL.BO's competition here
MICEL.NS vs AVALON.NS Comparison March 2026
MICEL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICEL.NS stands at 7.5B. In comparison, AVALON.NS has a market cap of 59.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MICEL.NS is priced at ₹31.69, while AVALON.NS trades at ₹915.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.39, whereas AVALON.NS's P/E ratio is 61.60. In terms of profitability, MICEL.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AVALON.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MICEL.NS is more volatile compared to AVALON.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICEL.NS.Check AVALON.NS's competition here
MICEL.NS vs AVALON.BO Comparison March 2026
MICEL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICEL.NS stands at 7.5B. In comparison, AVALON.BO has a market cap of 59B. Regarding current trading prices, MICEL.NS is priced at ₹31.69, while AVALON.BO trades at ₹909.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.39, whereas AVALON.BO's P/E ratio is 61.43. In terms of profitability, MICEL.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AVALON.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MICEL.NS is less volatile compared to AVALON.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICEL.NS.Check AVALON.BO's competition here
MICEL.NS vs KRN.NS Comparison March 2026
MICEL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICEL.NS stands at 7.5B. In comparison, KRN.NS has a market cap of 52.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MICEL.NS is priced at ₹31.69, while KRN.NS trades at ₹871.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.39, whereas KRN.NS's P/E ratio is 77.51. In terms of profitability, MICEL.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KRN.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MICEL.NS is more volatile compared to KRN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICEL.NS.Check KRN.NS's competition here
MICEL.NS vs CENTUM.BO Comparison March 2026
MICEL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICEL.NS stands at 7.5B. In comparison, CENTUM.BO has a market cap of 40.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MICEL.NS is priced at ₹31.69, while CENTUM.BO trades at ₹2,766.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.39, whereas CENTUM.BO's P/E ratio is -771.01. In terms of profitability, MICEL.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CENTUM.BO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MICEL.NS is less volatile compared to CENTUM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICEL.NS.Check CENTUM.BO's competition here
MICEL.NS vs CENTUM.NS Comparison March 2026
MICEL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICEL.NS stands at 7.5B. In comparison, CENTUM.NS has a market cap of 40.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MICEL.NS is priced at ₹31.69, while CENTUM.NS trades at ₹2,780.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.39, whereas CENTUM.NS's P/E ratio is -764.46. In terms of profitability, MICEL.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CENTUM.NS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MICEL.NS is less volatile compared to CENTUM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICEL.NS.Check CENTUM.NS's competition here
MICEL.NS vs CYIENTDLM.BO Comparison March 2026
MICEL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICEL.NS stands at 7.5B. In comparison, CYIENTDLM.BO has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MICEL.NS is priced at ₹31.69, while CYIENTDLM.BO trades at ₹279.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.39, whereas CYIENTDLM.BO's P/E ratio is 27.28. In terms of profitability, MICEL.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CYIENTDLM.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MICEL.NS is less volatile compared to CYIENTDLM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICEL.NS.Check CYIENTDLM.BO's competition here
MICEL.NS vs CYIENTDLM.NS Comparison March 2026
MICEL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICEL.NS stands at 7.5B. In comparison, CYIENTDLM.NS has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MICEL.NS is priced at ₹31.69, while CYIENTDLM.NS trades at ₹280.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.39, whereas CYIENTDLM.NS's P/E ratio is 27.20. In terms of profitability, MICEL.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CYIENTDLM.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MICEL.NS is less volatile compared to CYIENTDLM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICEL.NS.Check CYIENTDLM.NS's competition here
MICEL.NS vs ELPROINTL.BO Comparison March 2026
MICEL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICEL.NS stands at 7.5B. In comparison, ELPROINTL.BO has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MICEL.NS is priced at ₹31.69, while ELPROINTL.BO trades at ₹87.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.39, whereas ELPROINTL.BO's P/E ratio is 7.81. In terms of profitability, MICEL.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ELPROINTL.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MICEL.NS is more volatile compared to ELPROINTL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICEL.NS.Check ELPROINTL.BO's competition here
MICEL.NS vs RISHABH.BO Comparison March 2026
MICEL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICEL.NS stands at 7.5B. In comparison, RISHABH.BO has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, MICEL.NS is priced at ₹31.69, while RISHABH.BO trades at ₹372.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.39, whereas RISHABH.BO's P/E ratio is 20.13. In terms of profitability, MICEL.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RISHABH.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MICEL.NS is more volatile compared to RISHABH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICEL.NS.Check RISHABH.BO's competition here
MICEL.NS vs RISHABH.NS Comparison March 2026
MICEL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICEL.NS stands at 7.5B. In comparison, RISHABH.NS has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, MICEL.NS is priced at ₹31.69, while RISHABH.NS trades at ₹371.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.39, whereas RISHABH.NS's P/E ratio is 20.11. In terms of profitability, MICEL.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RISHABH.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MICEL.NS is less volatile compared to RISHABH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICEL.NS.Check RISHABH.NS's competition here
MICEL.NS vs IKIO.NS Comparison March 2026
MICEL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICEL.NS stands at 7.5B. In comparison, IKIO.NS has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MICEL.NS is priced at ₹31.69, while IKIO.NS trades at ₹107.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.39, whereas IKIO.NS's P/E ratio is 35.69. In terms of profitability, MICEL.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IKIO.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MICEL.NS is more volatile compared to IKIO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICEL.NS.Check IKIO.NS's competition here
MICEL.NS vs IKIO.BO Comparison March 2026
MICEL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICEL.NS stands at 7.5B. In comparison, IKIO.BO has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MICEL.NS is priced at ₹31.69, while IKIO.BO trades at ₹107.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.39, whereas IKIO.BO's P/E ratio is 35.68. In terms of profitability, MICEL.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IKIO.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MICEL.NS is less volatile compared to IKIO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICEL.NS.Check IKIO.BO's competition here
MICEL.NS vs IIL.BO Comparison March 2026
MICEL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICEL.NS stands at 7.5B. In comparison, IIL.BO has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MICEL.NS is priced at ₹31.69, while IIL.BO trades at ₹37.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.39, whereas IIL.BO's P/E ratio is 14.05. In terms of profitability, MICEL.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IIL.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MICEL.NS is less volatile compared to IIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICEL.NS.Check IIL.BO's competition here
MICEL.NS vs NITIRAJ.NS Comparison March 2026
MICEL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICEL.NS stands at 7.5B. In comparison, NITIRAJ.NS has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MICEL.NS is priced at ₹31.69, while NITIRAJ.NS trades at ₹212.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.39, whereas NITIRAJ.NS's P/E ratio is 28.59. In terms of profitability, MICEL.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NITIRAJ.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MICEL.NS is less volatile compared to NITIRAJ.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICEL.NS.Check NITIRAJ.NS's competition here
MICEL.NS vs BCCFUBA.BO Comparison March 2026
MICEL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICEL.NS stands at 7.5B. In comparison, BCCFUBA.BO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MICEL.NS is priced at ₹31.69, while BCCFUBA.BO trades at ₹109.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.39, whereas BCCFUBA.BO's P/E ratio is 38.10. In terms of profitability, MICEL.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BCCFUBA.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MICEL.NS is less volatile compared to BCCFUBA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICEL.NS.Check BCCFUBA.BO's competition here
MICEL.NS vs INCAP.BO Comparison March 2026
MICEL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICEL.NS stands at 7.5B. In comparison, INCAP.BO has a market cap of 426.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MICEL.NS is priced at ₹31.69, while INCAP.BO trades at ₹81.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.39, whereas INCAP.BO's P/E ratio is 73.45. In terms of profitability, MICEL.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to INCAP.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MICEL.NS is more volatile compared to INCAP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICEL.NS.Check INCAP.BO's competition here
MICEL.NS vs GUJARATPOLY.BO Comparison March 2026
MICEL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICEL.NS stands at 7.5B. In comparison, GUJARATPOLY.BO has a market cap of 425.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MICEL.NS is priced at ₹31.69, while GUJARATPOLY.BO trades at ₹50.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.39, whereas GUJARATPOLY.BO's P/E ratio is 1.49. In terms of profitability, MICEL.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GUJARATPOLY.BO's ROE of +1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, MICEL.NS is less volatile compared to GUJARATPOLY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICEL.NS.Check GUJARATPOLY.BO's competition here
MICEL.NS vs FINELINE.BO Comparison March 2026
MICEL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICEL.NS stands at 7.5B. In comparison, FINELINE.BO has a market cap of 385.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MICEL.NS is priced at ₹31.69, while FINELINE.BO trades at ₹80.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.39, whereas FINELINE.BO's P/E ratio is 163.51. In terms of profitability, MICEL.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FINELINE.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MICEL.NS is more volatile compared to FINELINE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICEL.NS.Check FINELINE.BO's competition here
MICEL.NS vs JMDVL.BO Comparison March 2026
MICEL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICEL.NS stands at 7.5B. In comparison, JMDVL.BO has a market cap of 172.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MICEL.NS is priced at ₹31.69, while JMDVL.BO trades at ₹5.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.39, whereas JMDVL.BO's P/E ratio is 23.96. In terms of profitability, MICEL.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JMDVL.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MICEL.NS is more volatile compared to JMDVL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICEL.NS.Check JMDVL.BO's competition here
MICEL.NS vs PANELEC.BO Comparison March 2026
MICEL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICEL.NS stands at 7.5B. In comparison, PANELEC.BO has a market cap of 144.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MICEL.NS is priced at ₹31.69, while PANELEC.BO trades at ₹36.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.39, whereas PANELEC.BO's P/E ratio is -4.10. In terms of profitability, MICEL.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PANELEC.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MICEL.NS is more volatile compared to PANELEC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICEL.NS.Check PANELEC.BO's competition here
MICEL.NS vs CONTAINE.BO Comparison March 2026
MICEL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICEL.NS stands at 7.5B. In comparison, CONTAINE.BO has a market cap of 88.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MICEL.NS is priced at ₹31.69, while CONTAINE.BO trades at ₹14.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.39, whereas CONTAINE.BO's P/E ratio is 13.69. In terms of profitability, MICEL.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CONTAINE.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MICEL.NS is less volatile compared to CONTAINE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICEL.NS.Check CONTAINE.BO's competition here
MICEL.NS vs TECHCON.BO Comparison March 2026
MICEL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICEL.NS stands at 7.5B. In comparison, TECHCON.BO has a market cap of 19.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MICEL.NS is priced at ₹31.69, while TECHCON.BO trades at ₹99.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.39, whereas TECHCON.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MICEL.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TECHCON.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MICEL.NS is more volatile compared to TECHCON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICEL.NS.Check TECHCON.BO's competition here