Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin Société en commandite par actions
Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin Société en commandite par actions MGDDY Peers
See (MGDDY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Stock Comparison
MGDDY vs FYGGY Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, FYGGY has a market cap of 48.07B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while FYGGY trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas FYGGY's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FYGGY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to FYGGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs DNZOY Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, DNZOY has a market cap of 37.36B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while DNZOY trades at $13.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas DNZOY's P/E ratio is 13.13. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DNZOY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to DNZOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs DNZOF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, DNZOF has a market cap of 34.68B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while DNZOF trades at $12.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas DNZOF's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DNZOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to DNZOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs APTV-PA Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, APTV-PA has a market cap of 29.42B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while APTV-PA trades at $108.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas APTV-PA's P/E ratio is 92.08. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to APTV-PA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to APTV-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs BRDCF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, BRDCF has a market cap of 29.09B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while BRDCF trades at $42.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas BRDCF's P/E ratio is 14.60. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BRDCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to BRDCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs BRDCY Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, BRDCY has a market cap of 28.86B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while BRDCY trades at $21.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas BRDCY's P/E ratio is 14.73. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BRDCY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to BRDCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs MGDDF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, MGDDF has a market cap of 26.40B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while MGDDF trades at $37.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas MGDDF's P/E ratio is 3.35. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MGDDF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to MGDDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs CTTAF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, CTTAF has a market cap of 16.55B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while CTTAF trades at $82.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas CTTAF's P/E ratio is 12.53. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CTTAF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to CTTAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs KNRRY Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, KNRRY has a market cap of 16.49B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while KNRRY trades at $25.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas KNRRY's P/E ratio is 32.79. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KNRRY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to KNRRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs CTTAY Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, CTTAY has a market cap of 16.28B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while CTTAY trades at $8.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas CTTAY's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CTTAY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to CTTAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs KNBHF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, KNBHF has a market cap of 15.80B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while KNBHF trades at $98.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas KNBHF's P/E ratio is 31.31. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KNBHF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to KNBHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs SMTOY Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, SMTOY has a market cap of 12.75B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while SMTOY trades at $16.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas SMTOY's P/E ratio is 9.79. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SMTOY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to SMTOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs APTV Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, APTV has a market cap of 12.67B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while APTV trades at $58.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas APTV's P/E ratio is 9.51. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to APTV's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to APTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs MBLY Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, MBLY has a market cap of 11.83B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while MBLY trades at $14.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas MBLY's P/E ratio is -3.96. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MBLY's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to MBLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs PTAIY Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, PTAIY has a market cap of 11.62B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while PTAIY trades at $5.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas PTAIY's P/E ratio is 5.74. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PTAIY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to PTAIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs PTAIF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, PTAIF has a market cap of 11.38B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while PTAIF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas PTAIF's P/E ratio is 5.62. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PTAIF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to PTAIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs HLLGY Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, HLLGY has a market cap of 10.56B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while HLLGY trades at $47.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas HLLGY's P/E ratio is 26.39. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HLLGY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to HLLGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs HLKHF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, HLKHF has a market cap of 10.28B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while HLKHF trades at $92.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas HLKHF's P/E ratio is 25.78. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HLKHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to HLKHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs LKQ Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, LKQ has a market cap of 10.17B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while LKQ trades at $39.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas LKQ's P/E ratio is 14.98. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LKQ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to LKQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs MGA Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, MGA has a market cap of 9.35B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while MGA trades at $33.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas MGA's P/E ratio is 8.28. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MGA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to MGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs ASEKY Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, ASEKY has a market cap of 9.09B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while ASEKY trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas ASEKY's P/E ratio is 12.63. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ASEKY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to ASEKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs ALSN Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, ALSN has a market cap of 8.30B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while ALSN trades at $97.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas ALSN's P/E ratio is 11.23. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ALSN's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to ALSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs ASEKF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, ASEKF has a market cap of 7.64B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while ASEKF trades at $10.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas ASEKF's P/E ratio is 10.50. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ASEKF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to ASEKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs ALV Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, ALV has a market cap of 7.21B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while ALV trades at $93.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas ALV's P/E ratio is 10.77. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ALV's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to ALV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs BWA Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, BWA has a market cap of 6.37B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while BWA trades at $28.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas BWA's P/E ratio is 17.78. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BWA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to BWA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs NGKSF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, NGKSF has a market cap of 6.00B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while NGKSF trades at $30.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas NGKSF's P/E ratio is 9.72. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NGKSF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to NGKSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs PLLIF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, PLLIF has a market cap of 5.90B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while PLLIF trades at $5.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas PLLIF's P/E ratio is 11.13. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PLLIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to PLLIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs SFFLY Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, SFFLY has a market cap of 5.67B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while SFFLY trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas SFFLY's P/E ratio is -6.19. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SFFLY's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to SFFLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs GNTX Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, GNTX has a market cap of 4.86B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while GNTX trades at $21.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas GNTX's P/E ratio is 12.57. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GNTX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to GNTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs NGKSY Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, NGKSY has a market cap of 4.83B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while NGKSY trades at $12.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas NGKSY's P/E ratio is 7.47. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NGKSY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to NGKSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs MOD Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, MOD has a market cap of 4.74B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while MOD trades at $90.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas MOD's P/E ratio is 30.34. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MOD's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to MOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs LEA Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, LEA has a market cap of 4.61B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while LEA trades at $86.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas LEA's P/E ratio is 9.60. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LEA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to LEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs KOTMF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, KOTMF has a market cap of 4.17B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while KOTMF trades at $14.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas KOTMF's P/E ratio is 25.79. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KOTMF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to KOTMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs YORUF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, YORUF has a market cap of 4.13B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while YORUF trades at $25.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas YORUF's P/E ratio is 8.68. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to YORUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to YORUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs YORUY Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, YORUY has a market cap of 3.99B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while YORUY trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas YORUY's P/E ratio is 6.98. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to YORUY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to YORUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs FESTF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, FESTF has a market cap of 3.97B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while FESTF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas FESTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FESTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to FESTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs BRBOY Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, BRBOY has a market cap of 3.88B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while BRBOY trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas BRBOY's P/E ratio is 16.51. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BRBOY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to BRBOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs DORM Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, DORM has a market cap of 3.76B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while DORM trades at $122.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas DORM's P/E ratio is 20.03. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DORM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to DORM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs BC-PB Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, BC-PB has a market cap of 3.73B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while BC-PB trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas BC-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BC-PB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to BC-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs KOTMY Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, KOTMY has a market cap of 3.66B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while KOTMY trades at $12.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas KOTMY's P/E ratio is 11.58. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KOTMY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to KOTMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs SCFLF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, SCFLF has a market cap of 3.44B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while SCFLF trades at $4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas SCFLF's P/E ratio is 9.60. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SCFLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to SCFLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs GT Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, GT has a market cap of 3.12B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while GT trades at $10.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas GT's P/E ratio is 45.67. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to GT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs BC-PA Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, BC-PA has a market cap of 3.12B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while BC-PA trades at $22.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas BC-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BC-PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to BC-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs BRBOF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, BRBOF has a market cap of 3.05B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while BRBOF trades at $9.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas BRBOF's P/E ratio is 10.30. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BRBOF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to BRBOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs STAEY Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, STAEY has a market cap of 2.86B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while STAEY trades at $9.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas STAEY's P/E ratio is 18.19. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to STAEY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to STAEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs MNTHY Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, MNTHY has a market cap of 2.75B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while MNTHY trades at $47.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas MNTHY's P/E ratio is 8.61. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MNTHY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to MNTHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs SMTUF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, SMTUF has a market cap of 2.70B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while SMTUF trades at $10.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas SMTUF's P/E ratio is 29.29. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SMTUF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to SMTUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs STAEF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, STAEF has a market cap of 2.53B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while STAEF trades at $16.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas STAEF's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to STAEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to STAEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs TDBOF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, TDBOF has a market cap of 2.46B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while TDBOF trades at $13.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas TDBOF's P/E ratio is 21.18. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TDBOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to TDBOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs VLEEY Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, VLEEY has a market cap of 2.36B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while VLEEY trades at $4.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas VLEEY's P/E ratio is 13.14. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VLEEY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to VLEEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs NHKGF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, NHKGF has a market cap of 2.34B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while NHKGF trades at $11.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas NHKGF's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NHKGF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to NHKGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs VTSCF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, VTSCF has a market cap of 2.32B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while VTSCF trades at $56.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas VTSCF's P/E ratio is 82.35. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VTSCF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to VTSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs MNTHF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, MNTHF has a market cap of 2.30B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while MNTHF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas MNTHF's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MNTHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to MNTHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs GTX Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, GTX has a market cap of 2.30B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while GTX trades at $11.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas GTX's P/E ratio is 8.80. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GTX's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to GTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs HSAI Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, HSAI has a market cap of 2.29B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while HSAI trades at $17.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas HSAI's P/E ratio is -156.91. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HSAI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to HSAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs LIMAF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, LIMAF has a market cap of 2.25B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while LIMAF trades at $37.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas LIMAF's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LIMAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to LIMAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs NPSKF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, NPSKF has a market cap of 2.20B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while NPSKF trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas NPSKF's P/E ratio is 32.14. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NPSKF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to NPSKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs VC Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, VC has a market cap of 2.20B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while VC trades at $80.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas VC's P/E ratio is 7.54. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to VC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs QS Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, QS has a market cap of 2.17B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while QS trades at $3.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas QS's P/E ratio is -4.27. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to QS's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to QS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs NPSKY Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, NPSKY has a market cap of 2.14B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while NPSKY trades at $8.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas NPSKY's P/E ratio is 30.14. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NPSKY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to NPSKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs DAN Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, DAN has a market cap of 2.13B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while DAN trades at $14.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas DAN's P/E ratio is -60.83. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DAN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to DAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs TGOSY Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, TGOSY has a market cap of 2.12B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while TGOSY trades at $33.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas TGOSY's P/E ratio is 8.34. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TGOSY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to TGOSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs ARBFF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, ARBFF has a market cap of 2.07B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while ARBFF trades at $24.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas ARBFF's P/E ratio is 31.15. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ARBFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to ARBFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs JELCF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, JELCF has a market cap of 1.98B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while JELCF trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas JELCF's P/E ratio is 8.27. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JELCF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to JELCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs NKRKY Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, NKRKY has a market cap of 1.95B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while NKRKY trades at $3.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas NKRKY's P/E ratio is -34.90. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NKRKY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to NKRKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs VLEEF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, VLEEF has a market cap of 1.90B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while VLEEF trades at $7.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas VLEEF's P/E ratio is 10.40. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VLEEF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to VLEEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs JEHLY Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, JEHLY has a market cap of 1.89B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while JEHLY trades at $20.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas JEHLY's P/E ratio is 8.01. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JEHLY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to JEHLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs MBUMY Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, MBUMY has a market cap of 1.83B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while MBUMY trades at $6.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas MBUMY's P/E ratio is 26.69. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MBUMY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to MBUMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs MBUMF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, MBUMF has a market cap of 1.75B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while MBUMF trades at $13.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas MBUMF's P/E ratio is 18.65. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MBUMF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to MBUMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs GMPUF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, GMPUF has a market cap of 1.68B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while GMPUF trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas GMPUF's P/E ratio is 7.97. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GMPUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to GMPUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs PHIN Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, PHIN has a market cap of 1.65B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while PHIN trades at $41.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas PHIN's P/E ratio is 23.36. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PHIN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to PHIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs UNIEF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, UNIEF has a market cap of 1.58B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while UNIEF trades at $35.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas UNIEF's P/E ratio is 24.13. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UNIEF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to UNIEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs GUDDY Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, GUDDY has a market cap of 1.55B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while GUDDY trades at $11.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas GUDDY's P/E ratio is 25.22. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GUDDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to GUDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs NTXVF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, NTXVF has a market cap of 1.52B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while NTXVF trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas NTXVF's P/E ratio is 30.25. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NTXVF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to NTXVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs FURCF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, FURCF has a market cap of 1.48B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while FURCF trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas FURCF's P/E ratio is -7.08. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FURCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to FURCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs PASTF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, PASTF has a market cap of 1.40B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while PASTF trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas PASTF's P/E ratio is 7.63. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PASTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to PASTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs NIFCY Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, NIFCY has a market cap of 1.32B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while NIFCY trades at $13.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas NIFCY's P/E ratio is 25.94. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NIFCY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to NIFCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs ADNT Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, ADNT has a market cap of 1.06B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while ADNT trades at $12.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas ADNT's P/E ratio is -630.50. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ADNT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to ADNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs NKRKF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, NKRKF has a market cap of 958.88M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while NKRKF trades at $6.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas NKRKF's P/E ratio is -36.61. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NKRKF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to NKRKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs TIANF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, TIANF has a market cap of 939.52M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while TIANF trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas TIANF's P/E ratio is 3.79. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TIANF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to TIANF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs XPEL Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, XPEL has a market cap of 924.41M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while XPEL trades at $33.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas XPEL's P/E ratio is 20.26. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to XPEL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to XPEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs GUDHF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, GUDHF has a market cap of 868.57M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while GUDHF trades at $6.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas GUDHF's P/E ratio is 17.19. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GUDHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to GUDHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs FOXF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, FOXF has a market cap of 840.09M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while FOXF trades at $20.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas FOXF's P/E ratio is 125.88. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FOXF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to FOXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs SFHLF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, SFHLF has a market cap of 826.18M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while SFHLF trades at $18.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas SFHLF's P/E ratio is 9.43. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SFHLF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to SFHLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs THRM Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, THRM has a market cap of 793.71M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while THRM trades at $25.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas THRM's P/E ratio is 16.18. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to THRM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to THRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs ATNNF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, ATNNF has a market cap of 775.56M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while ATNNF trades at $133.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas ATNNF's P/E ratio is 12.84. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ATNNF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to ATNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs ABDDF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, ABDDF has a market cap of 757.50M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while ABDDF trades at $33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas ABDDF's P/E ratio is 143.48. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ABDDF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to ABDDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs FAURY Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, FAURY has a market cap of 623.92M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while FAURY trades at $3.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas FAURY's P/E ratio is -11.74. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FAURY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to FAURY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs SMP Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, SMP has a market cap of 620.52M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while SMP trades at $28.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas SMP's P/E ratio is 10.94. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SMP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to SMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs PLOW Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, PLOW has a market cap of 588.55M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while PLOW trades at $25.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas PLOW's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PLOW's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to PLOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs GTXAP Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, GTXAP has a market cap of 557.94M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while GTXAP trades at $8.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas GTXAP's P/E ratio is 4.44. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GTXAP's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to GTXAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs FCVFF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, FCVFF has a market cap of 509.71M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while FCVFF trades at $10.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas FCVFF's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FCVFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to FCVFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs AEVA Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, AEVA has a market cap of 503.91M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while AEVA trades at $9.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas AEVA's P/E ratio is -3.23. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AEVA's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to AEVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs ALLG Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, ALLG has a market cap of 496.92M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while ALLG trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas ALLG's P/E ratio is -3.96. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ALLG's ROE of +2.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to ALLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs ECX Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, ECX has a market cap of 493.65M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while ECX trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas ECX's P/E ratio is -4.47. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ECX's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to ECX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs AXL Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, AXL has a market cap of 489.90M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while AXL trades at $4.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas AXL's P/E ratio is 23.00. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AXL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to AXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs MLR Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, MLR has a market cap of 481.98M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while MLR trades at $42.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas MLR's P/E ratio is 7.69. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MLR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to MLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs CPS Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, CPS has a market cap of 446.60M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while CPS trades at $25.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas CPS's P/E ratio is -5.68. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CPS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to CPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs TCISF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, TCISF has a market cap of 419.96M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while TCISF trades at $12.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas TCISF's P/E ratio is 9.35. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TCISF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to TCISF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs MRETF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, MRETF has a market cap of 414.40M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while MRETF trades at $5.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas MRETF's P/E ratio is 3.91. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MRETF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to MRETF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs NMAKF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, NMAKF has a market cap of 403.30M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while NMAKF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas NMAKF's P/E ratio is 13.30. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NMAKF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to NMAKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs SAEOF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, SAEOF has a market cap of 401.22M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while SAEOF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas SAEOF's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SAEOF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to SAEOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs VTSCY Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, VTSCY has a market cap of 400.21M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while VTSCY trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas VTSCY's P/E ratio is 76.92. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VTSCY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to VTSCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs MNRO Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, MNRO has a market cap of 399.82M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while MNRO trades at $13.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas MNRO's P/E ratio is 20.86. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MNRO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to MNRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs PWRHF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, PWRHF has a market cap of 371.08M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while PWRHF trades at $3.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas PWRHF's P/E ratio is 23.06. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PWRHF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to PWRHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs XNGIF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, XNGIF has a market cap of 347.10M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while XNGIF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas XNGIF's P/E ratio is 9.11. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to XNGIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to XNGIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs ELLRY Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, ELLRY has a market cap of 304.13M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while ELLRY trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas ELLRY's P/E ratio is -1.94. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ELLRY's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to ELLRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs EGKLF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, EGKLF has a market cap of 302.70M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while EGKLF trades at $4.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas EGKLF's P/E ratio is -1.93. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EGKLF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to EGKLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs SES Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, SES has a market cap of 297.44M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while SES trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas SES's P/E ratio is -2.70. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SES's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to SES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs NPSGF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, NPSGF has a market cap of 294.64M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while NPSGF trades at $3.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas NPSGF's P/E ratio is 6.31. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NPSGF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to NPSGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs HYLN Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, HYLN has a market cap of 271.61M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while HYLN trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas HYLN's P/E ratio is -5.17. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HYLN's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to HYLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs HLLY-WT Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, HLLY-WT has a market cap of 261.50M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while HLLY-WT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas HLLY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HLLY-WT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to HLLY-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs NPSGY Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, NPSGY has a market cap of 256.79M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while NPSGY trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas NPSGY's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NPSGY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to NPSGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs HLLY Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, HLLY has a market cap of 244.86M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while HLLY trades at $2.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas HLLY's P/E ratio is -10.30. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HLLY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to HLLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs IOCJY Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, IOCJY has a market cap of 224.68M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while IOCJY trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas IOCJY's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IOCJY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to IOCJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs AKBIF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, AKBIF has a market cap of 181.27M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while AKBIF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas AKBIF's P/E ratio is 9.54. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AKBIF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to AKBIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs MPAA Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, MPAA has a market cap of 177.82M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while MPAA trades at $9.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas MPAA's P/E ratio is -10.32. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MPAA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to MPAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs EXCOF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, EXCOF has a market cap of 174.32M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while EXCOF trades at $4.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas EXCOF's P/E ratio is 9.08. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EXCOF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to EXCOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs LAZR Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, LAZR has a market cap of 169.75M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while LAZR trades at $3.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas LAZR's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LAZR's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to LAZR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs WLMTF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, WLMTF has a market cap of 164.91M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while WLMTF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas WLMTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WLMTF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to WLMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs XL Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, XL has a market cap of 164.38M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while XL trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas XL's P/E ratio is -3.21. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to XL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to XL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs AMGRF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, AMGRF has a market cap of 162.61M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while AMGRF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas AMGRF's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AMGRF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to AMGRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs HWAFF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, HWAFF has a market cap of 158.02M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while HWAFF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas HWAFF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HWAFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to HWAFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs KGAUF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, KGAUF has a market cap of 150.54M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while KGAUF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas KGAUF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KGAUF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to KGAUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs STRT Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, STRT has a market cap of 146.86M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while STRT trades at $35.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas STRT's P/E ratio is 8.78. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to STRT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to STRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs SCTH Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, SCTH has a market cap of 139.47M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while SCTH trades at $3.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas SCTH's P/E ratio is -395.00. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SCTH's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to SCTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs INVZ Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, INVZ has a market cap of 139.27M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while INVZ trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas INVZ's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to INVZ's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to INVZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs INVZW Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, INVZW has a market cap of 128.79M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while INVZW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas INVZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to INVZW's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to INVZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs SRI Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, SRI has a market cap of 122.25M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while SRI trades at $4.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas SRI's P/E ratio is -6.86. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SRI's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to SRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs CAAS Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, CAAS has a market cap of 120.68M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while CAAS trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas CAAS's P/E ratio is 4.04. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CAAS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to CAAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs KNDI Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, KNDI has a market cap of 95.22M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while KNDI trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas KNDI's P/E ratio is -1.85. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KNDI's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to KNDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs GGROW Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, GGROW has a market cap of 91.96M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while GGROW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas GGROW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GGROW's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to GGROW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs SUP Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, SUP has a market cap of 75.57M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while SUP trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas SUP's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SUP's ROE of -213.78%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to SUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs GGR Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, GGR has a market cap of 74.43M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while GGR trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas GGR's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GGR's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to GGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs CAOHF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, CAOHF has a market cap of 61.12M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while CAOHF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas CAOHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CAOHF's ROE of -14.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to CAOHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs MKDW Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, MKDW has a market cap of 48.18M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while MKDW trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas MKDW's P/E ratio is -2.24. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MKDW's ROE of +1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to MKDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs WPRT Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, WPRT has a market cap of 47.48M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while WPRT trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas WPRT's P/E ratio is -2.16. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WPRT's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to WPRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs STSGF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, STSGF has a market cap of 38.71M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while STSGF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas STSGF's P/E ratio is 19.36. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to STSGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to STSGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs NWFAF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, NWFAF has a market cap of 37.88M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while NWFAF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas NWFAF's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NWFAF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to NWFAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs SYPR Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, SYPR has a market cap of 35.62M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while SYPR trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas SYPR's P/E ratio is -19.37. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SYPR's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to SYPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs LEAT Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, LEAT has a market cap of 34.82M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while LEAT trades at $5.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas LEAT's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LEAT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to LEAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs CVGI Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, CVGI has a market cap of 31.18M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while CVGI trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas CVGI's P/E ratio is -0.84. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CVGI's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to CVGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs VOAXF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, VOAXF has a market cap of 27.00M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while VOAXF trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas VOAXF's P/E ratio is -3.07. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VOAXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to VOAXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs CREVF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, CREVF has a market cap of 23.34M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while CREVF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas CREVF's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CREVF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to CREVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs ECXWW Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, ECXWW has a market cap of 21.99M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while ECXWW trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas ECXWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ECXWW's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to ECXWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs CCEGF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, CCEGF has a market cap of 20.56M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while CCEGF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas CCEGF's P/E ratio is -9.33. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CCEGF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to CCEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs NCNCW Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, NCNCW has a market cap of 20.16M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while NCNCW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas NCNCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NCNCW's ROE of +3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to NCNCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs NCNC Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, NCNC has a market cap of 20.16M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while NCNC trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas NCNC's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NCNC's ROE of +3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to NCNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs AMV Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, AMV has a market cap of 17.83M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while AMV trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas AMV's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AMV's ROE of +13.81%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to AMV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs WKSP Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, WKSP has a market cap of 14.82M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while WKSP trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas WKSP's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WKSP's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to WKSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs INEO Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, INEO has a market cap of 13.32M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while INEO trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas INEO's P/E ratio is 8.67. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to INEO's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to INEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs CMMCF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, CMMCF has a market cap of 13.17M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while CMMCF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas CMMCF's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMMCF's ROE of -4.65%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to CMMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs LIDRW Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, LIDRW has a market cap of 12.75M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while LIDRW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas LIDRW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LIDRW's ROE of -1.95%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to LIDRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs LIDR Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, LIDR has a market cap of 12.75M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while LIDR trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas LIDR's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LIDR's ROE of -1.95%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to LIDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs SAG Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, SAG has a market cap of 10.35M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while SAG trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas SAG's P/E ratio is 6.73. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SAG's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to SAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs CREV Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, CREV has a market cap of 5.26M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while CREV trades at $2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas CREV's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CREV's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to CREV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs ATHHF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, ATHHF has a market cap of 5.17M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while ATHHF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas ATHHF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ATHHF's ROE of +1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to ATHHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs UFMG Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, UFMG has a market cap of 4.49M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while UFMG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas UFMG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UFMG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to UFMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs AMTY Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, AMTY has a market cap of 3.45M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while AMTY trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas AMTY's P/E ratio is 4.55. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AMTY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to AMTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs AFFL Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, AFFL has a market cap of 3.28M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while AFFL trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas AFFL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AFFL's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to AFFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs OPTI Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, OPTI has a market cap of 3.25M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while OPTI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas OPTI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OPTI's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to OPTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs NFGRF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, NFGRF has a market cap of 2.97M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while NFGRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas NFGRF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NFGRF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to NFGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs UFAB Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, UFAB has a market cap of 1.97M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while UFAB trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas UFAB's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UFAB's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to UFAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs SPKTF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, SPKTF has a market cap of 1.77M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while SPKTF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas SPKTF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SPKTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to SPKTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs CDTI Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, CDTI has a market cap of 1.42M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while CDTI trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas CDTI's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CDTI's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to CDTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs SVTE Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, SVTE has a market cap of 885287.00. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while SVTE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas SVTE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SVTE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to SVTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs GTLA Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, GTLA has a market cap of 590600.00. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while GTLA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas GTLA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GTLA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to GTLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs WKSPW Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, WKSPW has a market cap of 575286.00. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while WKSPW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas WKSPW's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WKSPW's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to WKSPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs MWWC Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, MWWC has a market cap of 572891.00. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while MWWC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas MWWC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MWWC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to MWWC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs AGRS Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, AGRS has a market cap of 500000.00. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while AGRS trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas AGRS's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AGRS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to AGRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs FRSX Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, FRSX has a market cap of 448060.00. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while FRSX trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas FRSX's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FRSX's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to FRSX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs OMTK Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, OMTK has a market cap of 438962.00. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while OMTK trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas OMTK's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OMTK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to OMTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs CREVW Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, CREVW has a market cap of 182834.00. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while CREVW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas CREVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CREVW's ROE of -1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to CREVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs TRBD Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, TRBD has a market cap of 100000.00. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while TRBD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas TRBD's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TRBD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to TRBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs EGTK Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, EGTK has a market cap of 51353.00. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while EGTK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas EGTK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EGTK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to EGTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs HYZNW Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, HYZNW has a market cap of 15529.00. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while HYZNW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas HYZNW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HYZNW's ROE of -2.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to HYZNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs CAGR Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, CAGR has a market cap of 9438.00. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while CAGR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas CAGR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CAGR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to CAGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs PFTI Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, PFTI has a market cap of 6902.00. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while PFTI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas PFTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PFTI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to PFTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs ADEC Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, ADEC has a market cap of 6680.00. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while ADEC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas ADEC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ADEC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to ADEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs VYDR Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, VYDR has a market cap of 6230.00. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while VYDR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas VYDR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VYDR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to VYDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs STCC Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, STCC has a market cap of 4728.00. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while STCC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas STCC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to STCC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to STCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs UFABQ Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, UFABQ has a market cap of 3520.00. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while UFABQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas UFABQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UFABQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to UFABQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs ODYC Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, ODYC has a market cap of 3507.00. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while ODYC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas ODYC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ODYC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to ODYC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs DTRO Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, DTRO has a market cap of 3364.00. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while DTRO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas DTRO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DTRO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to DTRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs AZDDQ Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, AZDDQ has a market cap of 1969.00. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while AZDDQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas AZDDQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AZDDQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to AZDDQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs SNSGF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, SNSGF has a market cap of 1618.00. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while SNSGF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas SNSGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SNSGF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to SNSGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs PLNTQ Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, PLNTQ has a market cap of 1578.00. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while PLNTQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas PLNTQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PLNTQ's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to PLNTQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs TXIC Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, TXIC has a market cap of 1453.00. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while TXIC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas TXIC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TXIC's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to TXIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs CSHEF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, CSHEF has a market cap of 902.00. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while CSHEF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas CSHEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CSHEF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to CSHEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs FLES Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, FLES has a market cap of 885.00. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while FLES trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas FLES's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FLES's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to FLES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs JBZY Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, JBZY has a market cap of 834.00. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while JBZY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas JBZY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JBZY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to JBZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs ATCV Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, ATCV has a market cap of 711.00. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while ATCV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas ATCV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ATCV's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to ATCV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs ESWW Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, ESWW has a market cap of 68.00. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while ESWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas ESWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ESWW's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to ESWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs MOTUY Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, MOTUY comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while MOTUY trades at $6.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas MOTUY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MOTUY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to MOTUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs MKDWW Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, MKDWW comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while MKDWW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas MKDWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MKDWW's ROE of +1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to MKDWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs MTOR Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, MTOR comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while MTOR trades at $36.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas MTOR's P/E ratio is 11.97. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MTOR's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to MTOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs RMO Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, RMO comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while RMO trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas RMO's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RMO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to RMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs ENVS Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, ENVS comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while ENVS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas ENVS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ENVS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to ENVS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs VNE Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, VNE comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while VNE trades at $36.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas VNE's P/E ratio is -10.74. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VNE's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to VNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs USAM Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, USAM comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while USAM trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas USAM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USAM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to USAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs HLRD Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, HLRD comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while HLRD trades at $417.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas HLRD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HLRD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to HLRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs HZN Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26.10B. In comparison, HZN comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.49, while HZN trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas HZN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HZN's ROE of +1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to HZN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto-Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FYGGY | $1.50 | N/A | 48.07B | 13.64 | $0.11 | +0.42% |
| DNZOY | $13.26 | -0.38% | 37.36B | 13.13 | $1.01 | +1.58% |
| DNZOF | $12.31 | -8.73% | 34.68B | 12.31 | $1.00 | +3.15% |
| APTV-PA | $108.66 | +0.15% | 29.42B | 92.08 | $1.18 | N/A |
| BRDCF | $42.48 | +18.33% | 29.09B | 14.60 | $2.91 | +3.10% |
| BRDCY | $21.07 | -0.28% | 28.86B | 14.73 | $1.43 | +1.70% |
| MGDDF | $37.41 | +4.83% | 26.40B | 3.35 | $11.17 | +3.92% |
| MGDDY | $18.49 | +0.49% | 26.10B | 8.28 | $2.23 | +3.94% |
| CTTAF | $82.73 | +2.07% | 16.55B | 12.53 | $6.60 | +3.01% |
| KNRRY | $25.58 | +1.55% | 16.49B | 32.79 | $0.78 | +0.99% |