Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin Société en commandite par actions
Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin Société en commandite par actions MGDDY Peers
See (MGDDY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MGDDY | $18.07 | -1.47% | 26B | 8.25 | $2.23 | +4.11% |
| FYGGY | $1.50 | +0.00% | 48.1B | 13.64 | $0.11 | +4.11% |
| DNZOF | $12.31 | -12.63% | 38.5B | 13.53 | $1.01 | +3.18% |
| DNZOY | $13.22 | +0.95% | 36.7B | 13.02 | $1.00 | +1.83% |
| MGDDF | $39.16 | +6.64% | 27.6B | 3.51 | $11.17 | +3.98% |
| BRDCY | $20.28 | -1.27% | 27.6B | 14.70 | $1.38 | +2.18% |
| BRDCF | $40.50 | +0.00% | 27.5B | 14.57 | $2.78 | +3.25% |
| CTTAF | $83.75 | -1.48% | 16.8B | 12.53 | $6.70 | +2.98% |
| CTTAY | $8.26 | -1.99% | 16.6B | 12.36 | $0.67 | +3.43% |
| KNRRY | $24.69 | +0.07% | 15.9B | 32.48 | $0.76 | +2.01% |
Stock Comparison
MGDDY vs FYGGY Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, FYGGY has a market cap of 48.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while FYGGY trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas FYGGY's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FYGGY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to FYGGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs DNZOF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, DNZOF has a market cap of 38.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while DNZOF trades at $12.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas DNZOF's P/E ratio is 13.53. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DNZOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to DNZOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs DNZOY Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, DNZOY has a market cap of 36.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while DNZOY trades at $13.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas DNZOY's P/E ratio is 13.02. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DNZOY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to DNZOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs MGDDF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, MGDDF has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while MGDDF trades at $39.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas MGDDF's P/E ratio is 3.51. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MGDDF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to MGDDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs BRDCY Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, BRDCY has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while BRDCY trades at $20.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas BRDCY's P/E ratio is 14.70. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BRDCY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to BRDCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs BRDCF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, BRDCF has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while BRDCF trades at $40.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas BRDCF's P/E ratio is 14.57. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BRDCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to BRDCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs CTTAF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, CTTAF has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while CTTAF trades at $83.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas CTTAF's P/E ratio is 12.53. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CTTAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to CTTAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs CTTAY Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, CTTAY has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while CTTAY trades at $8.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas CTTAY's P/E ratio is 12.36. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CTTAY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to CTTAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs KNRRY Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, KNRRY has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while KNRRY trades at $24.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas KNRRY's P/E ratio is 32.48. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KNRRY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to KNRRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs SMTOY Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, SMTOY has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while SMTOY trades at $20.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas SMTOY's P/E ratio is 11.75. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SMTOY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to SMTOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs KNBHF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, KNBHF has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while KNBHF trades at $98.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas KNBHF's P/E ratio is 31.61. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KNBHF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to KNBHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs PTAIF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, PTAIF has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while PTAIF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas PTAIF's P/E ratio is 5.58. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PTAIF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to PTAIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs PTAIY Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, PTAIY has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while PTAIY trades at $5.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas PTAIY's P/E ratio is 5.64. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PTAIY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to PTAIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs HLLGY Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, HLLGY has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while HLLGY trades at $47.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas HLLGY's P/E ratio is 29.50. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HLLGY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to HLLGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs HLKHF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, HLKHF has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while HLKHF trades at $92.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas HLKHF's P/E ratio is 25.78. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HLKHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to HLKHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs ASEKY Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, ASEKY has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while ASEKY trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas ASEKY's P/E ratio is 13.16. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ASEKY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to ASEKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs ASEKF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, ASEKF has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while ASEKF trades at $10.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas ASEKF's P/E ratio is 10.61. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ASEKF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to ASEKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs NGKSY Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, NGKSY has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while NGKSY trades at $17.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas NGKSY's P/E ratio is 10.71. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NGKSY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to NGKSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs SFFLY Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, SFFLY has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while SFFLY trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas SFFLY's P/E ratio is -5.43. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SFFLY's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to SFFLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs PLLIF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, PLLIF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while PLLIF trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas PLLIF's P/E ratio is 11.40. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PLLIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to PLLIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs NGKSF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, NGKSF has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while NGKSF trades at $30.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas NGKSF's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NGKSF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to NGKSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs YORUF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, YORUF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while YORUF trades at $25.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas YORUF's P/E ratio is 8.68. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to YORUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to YORUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs BRBOY Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, BRBOY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while BRBOY trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas BRBOY's P/E ratio is 16.51. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BRBOY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to BRBOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs YORUY Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, YORUY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while YORUY trades at $24.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas YORUY's P/E ratio is 6.71. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to YORUY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to YORUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs KOTMY Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, KOTMY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while KOTMY trades at $11.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas KOTMY's P/E ratio is 10.97. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KOTMY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to KOTMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs SCFLF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, SCFLF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while SCFLF trades at $4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas SCFLF's P/E ratio is 9.60. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SCFLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to SCFLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs KOTMF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, KOTMF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while KOTMF trades at $11.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas KOTMF's P/E ratio is 10.96. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KOTMF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to KOTMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs STAEY Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, STAEY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while STAEY trades at $11.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas STAEY's P/E ratio is 15.77. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to STAEY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to STAEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs STAEF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, STAEF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while STAEF trades at $20.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas STAEF's P/E ratio is 14.23. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to STAEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to STAEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs SMTUF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, SMTUF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while SMTUF trades at $11.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas SMTUF's P/E ratio is -37.30. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SMTUF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to SMTUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs MNTHY Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, MNTHY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while MNTHY trades at $51.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas MNTHY's P/E ratio is 9.09. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MNTHY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to MNTHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs BRBOF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, BRBOF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while BRBOF trades at $8.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas BRBOF's P/E ratio is 10.32. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BRBOF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to BRBOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs LIMAF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, LIMAF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while LIMAF trades at $46.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas LIMAF's P/E ratio is 14.86. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LIMAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to LIMAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs VLEEF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, VLEEF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while VLEEF trades at $10.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas VLEEF's P/E ratio is 14.28. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VLEEF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to VLEEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs VLEEY Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, VLEEY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while VLEEY trades at $5.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas VLEEY's P/E ratio is 13.92. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VLEEY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to VLEEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs JELCF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, JELCF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while JELCF trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas JELCF's P/E ratio is 9.64. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JELCF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to JELCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs NHKGF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, NHKGF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while NHKGF trades at $11.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas NHKGF's P/E ratio is 7.60. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NHKGF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to NHKGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs TDBOF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, TDBOF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while TDBOF trades at $13.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas TDBOF's P/E ratio is 20.66. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TDBOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to TDBOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs VTSCF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, VTSCF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while VTSCF trades at $56.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas VTSCF's P/E ratio is 82.35. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VTSCF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to VTSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs NIFCY Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, NIFCY has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while NIFCY trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas NIFCY's P/E ratio is 22.72. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NIFCY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to NIFCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs MNTHF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, MNTHF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while MNTHF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas MNTHF's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MNTHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to MNTHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs NPSKF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, NPSKF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while NPSKF trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas NPSKF's P/E ratio is 32.14. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NPSKF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to NPSKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs NPSKY Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, NPSKY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while NPSKY trades at $8.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas NPSKY's P/E ratio is 25.66. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NPSKY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to NPSKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs TGOSY Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, TGOSY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while TGOSY trades at $33.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas TGOSY's P/E ratio is 8.34. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TGOSY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to TGOSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs ARBFF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, ARBFF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while ARBFF trades at $24.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas ARBFF's P/E ratio is 31.15. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ARBFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to ARBFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs JEHLY Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, JEHLY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while JEHLY trades at $20.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas JEHLY's P/E ratio is 7.27. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JEHLY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to JEHLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs FURCF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, FURCF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while FURCF trades at $9.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas FURCF's P/E ratio is -8.64. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FURCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to FURCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs MBUMY Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, MBUMY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while MBUMY trades at $7.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas MBUMY's P/E ratio is 27.98. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MBUMY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to MBUMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs MBUMF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, MBUMF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while MBUMF trades at $13.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas MBUMF's P/E ratio is 18.65. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MBUMF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to MBUMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs GMPUF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, GMPUF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while GMPUF trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas GMPUF's P/E ratio is 9.22. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GMPUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to GMPUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs UNIEF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, UNIEF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while UNIEF trades at $35.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas UNIEF's P/E ratio is 24.13. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UNIEF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to UNIEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs NTXVF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, NTXVF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while NTXVF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas NTXVF's P/E ratio is 31.40. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NTXVF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to NTXVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs FAURY Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, FAURY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while FAURY trades at $1.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas FAURY's P/E ratio is -7.15. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FAURY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to FAURY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs PASTF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, PASTF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while PASTF trades at $9.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas PASTF's P/E ratio is 8.05. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PASTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to PASTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs NKRKY Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, NKRKY has a market cap of 962.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while NKRKY trades at $3.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas NKRKY's P/E ratio is -23.27. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NKRKY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to NKRKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs NKRKF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, NKRKF has a market cap of 958.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while NKRKF trades at $6.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas NKRKF's P/E ratio is -23.18. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NKRKF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to NKRKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs TIANF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, TIANF has a market cap of 939.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while TIANF trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas TIANF's P/E ratio is 3.79. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TIANF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to TIANF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs SFHLF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, SFHLF has a market cap of 817.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while SFHLF trades at $18.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas SFHLF's P/E ratio is 11.12. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SFHLF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to SFHLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs GUDDY Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, GUDDY has a market cap of 777.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while GUDDY trades at $11.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas GUDDY's P/E ratio is 25.42. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GUDDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to GUDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs ATNNF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, ATNNF has a market cap of 775.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while ATNNF trades at $133.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas ATNNF's P/E ratio is 12.84. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ATNNF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to ATNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs ABDDF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, ABDDF has a market cap of 757.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while ABDDF trades at $33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas ABDDF's P/E ratio is 143.48. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ABDDF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to ABDDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs GUDHF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, GUDHF has a market cap of 693.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while GUDHF trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas GUDHF's P/E ratio is 13.78. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GUDHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to GUDHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs NMAKF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, NMAKF has a market cap of 511.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while NMAKF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas NMAKF's P/E ratio is -17.50. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NMAKF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to NMAKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs FCVFF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, FCVFF has a market cap of 509.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while FCVFF trades at $10.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas FCVFF's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FCVFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to FCVFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs MRETF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, MRETF has a market cap of 449.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while MRETF trades at $6.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas MRETF's P/E ratio is -10.84. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MRETF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to MRETF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs TCISF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, TCISF has a market cap of 420M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while TCISF trades at $12.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas TCISF's P/E ratio is 9.35. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TCISF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to TCISF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs SAEOF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, SAEOF has a market cap of 401.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while SAEOF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas SAEOF's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SAEOF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to SAEOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs VTSCY Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, VTSCY has a market cap of 400.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while VTSCY trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas VTSCY's P/E ratio is 76.92. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VTSCY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to VTSCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs PWRHF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, PWRHF has a market cap of 371.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while PWRHF trades at $3.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas PWRHF's P/E ratio is 23.06. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PWRHF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to PWRHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs ELLRY Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, ELLRY has a market cap of 335.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while ELLRY trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas ELLRY's P/E ratio is -1.98. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ELLRY's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to ELLRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs AMGRF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, AMGRF has a market cap of 325.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while AMGRF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas AMGRF's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AMGRF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to AMGRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs EGKLF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, EGKLF has a market cap of 302.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while EGKLF trades at $4.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas EGKLF's P/E ratio is -1.81. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EGKLF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to EGKLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs NPSGF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, NPSGF has a market cap of 294.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while NPSGF trades at $3.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas NPSGF's P/E ratio is 6.31. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NPSGF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to NPSGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs IOCJY Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, IOCJY has a market cap of 247.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while IOCJY trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas IOCJY's P/E ratio is 6.11. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IOCJY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to IOCJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs NPSGY Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, NPSGY has a market cap of 245.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while NPSGY trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas NPSGY's P/E ratio is -1.81. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NPSGY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to NPSGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs XNGIF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, XNGIF has a market cap of 244.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while XNGIF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas XNGIF's P/E ratio is 6.43. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to XNGIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to XNGIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs AKBIF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, AKBIF has a market cap of 192.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while AKBIF trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas AKBIF's P/E ratio is 10.14. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AKBIF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to AKBIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs EXCOF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, EXCOF has a market cap of 190.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while EXCOF trades at $4.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas EXCOF's P/E ratio is 9.96. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EXCOF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to EXCOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs WLMTF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, WLMTF has a market cap of 164.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while WLMTF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas WLMTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WLMTF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to WLMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs SCTH Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, SCTH has a market cap of 163.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while SCTH trades at $4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas SCTH's P/E ratio is -464.00. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SCTH's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to SCTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs HWAFF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, HWAFF has a market cap of 158M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while HWAFF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas HWAFF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HWAFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to HWAFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs KGAUF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, KGAUF has a market cap of 148.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while KGAUF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas KGAUF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KGAUF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to KGAUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs FESTF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, FESTF has a market cap of 101.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while FESTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas FESTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FESTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to FESTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs CAOHF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, CAOHF has a market cap of 61.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while CAOHF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas CAOHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CAOHF's ROE of -14.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to CAOHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs LEAT Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, LEAT has a market cap of 56M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while LEAT trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas LEAT's P/E ratio is -180.00. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LEAT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to LEAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs STSGF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, STSGF has a market cap of 38.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while STSGF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas STSGF's P/E ratio is 19.36. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to STSGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to STSGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs NWFAF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, NWFAF has a market cap of 37.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while NWFAF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas NWFAF's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NWFAF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to NWFAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs NFGRF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, NFGRF has a market cap of 33.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while NFGRF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas NFGRF's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NFGRF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to NFGRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs VOAXF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, VOAXF has a market cap of 27M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while VOAXF trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas VOAXF's P/E ratio is -3.07. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VOAXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to VOAXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs CREVF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, CREVF has a market cap of 23.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while CREVF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas CREVF's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CREVF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to CREVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs CCEGF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, CCEGF has a market cap of 20.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while CCEGF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas CCEGF's P/E ratio is -9.33. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CCEGF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to CCEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs CMMCF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, CMMCF has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while CMMCF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas CMMCF's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMMCF's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to CMMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs ATHHF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, ATHHF has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while ATHHF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas ATHHF's P/E ratio is -6.80. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ATHHF's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to ATHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs UFMG Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, UFMG has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while UFMG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas UFMG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UFMG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to UFMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs AFFL Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, AFFL has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while AFFL trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas AFFL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AFFL's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to AFFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs OPTI Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, OPTI has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while OPTI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas OPTI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OPTI's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to OPTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs AMTY Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, AMTY has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while AMTY trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas AMTY's P/E ratio is 3.13. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AMTY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is less volatile compared to AMTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs SPKTF Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, SPKTF has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while SPKTF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas SPKTF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SPKTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to SPKTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.
MGDDY vs CDTI Comparison
MGDDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDY stands at 26B. In comparison, CDTI has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDY is priced at $18.07, while CDTI trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.25, whereas CDTI's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, MGDDY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CDTI's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDY is more volatile compared to CDTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDY.