Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin Société en commandite par actions
Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin Société en commandite par actions MGDDF Peers
See (MGDDF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MGDDF | $39.16 | +6.64% | 27.6B | 3.51 | $11.17 | +3.98% |
| FYGGY | $1.50 | +0.00% | 48.1B | 13.64 | $0.11 | +4.11% |
| DNZOF | $12.31 | -12.63% | 38.5B | 13.53 | $1.01 | +3.18% |
| DNZOY | $13.22 | +0.95% | 36.7B | 13.02 | $1.00 | +1.83% |
| BRDCY | $20.28 | -1.27% | 27.6B | 14.70 | $1.38 | +2.18% |
| BRDCF | $40.50 | +0.00% | 27.5B | 14.57 | $2.78 | +3.25% |
| MGDDY | $18.07 | -1.47% | 26B | 8.25 | $2.23 | +4.11% |
| CTTAF | $83.75 | -1.48% | 16.8B | 12.53 | $6.70 | +2.98% |
| CTTAY | $8.26 | -1.99% | 16.6B | 12.36 | $0.67 | +3.43% |
| KNRRY | $24.69 | +0.07% | 15.9B | 32.48 | $0.76 | +2.01% |
Stock Comparison
MGDDF vs FYGGY Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, FYGGY has a market cap of 48.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while FYGGY trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas FYGGY's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FYGGY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF and FYGGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MGDDF vs DNZOF Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, DNZOF has a market cap of 38.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while DNZOF trades at $12.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas DNZOF's P/E ratio is 13.53. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DNZOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF and DNZOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MGDDF vs DNZOY Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, DNZOY has a market cap of 36.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while DNZOY trades at $13.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas DNZOY's P/E ratio is 13.02. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DNZOY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF is less volatile compared to DNZOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDF.
MGDDF vs BRDCY Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, BRDCY has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while BRDCY trades at $20.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas BRDCY's P/E ratio is 14.70. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BRDCY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF is less volatile compared to BRDCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDF.
MGDDF vs BRDCF Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, BRDCF has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while BRDCF trades at $40.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas BRDCF's P/E ratio is 14.57. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BRDCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF and BRDCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MGDDF vs MGDDY Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, MGDDY has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while MGDDY trades at $18.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas MGDDY's P/E ratio is 8.25. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MGDDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF is less volatile compared to MGDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDF.
MGDDF vs CTTAF Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, CTTAF has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while CTTAF trades at $83.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas CTTAF's P/E ratio is 12.53. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CTTAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF is less volatile compared to CTTAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDF.
MGDDF vs CTTAY Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, CTTAY has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while CTTAY trades at $8.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas CTTAY's P/E ratio is 12.36. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CTTAY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF is less volatile compared to CTTAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDF.
MGDDF vs KNRRY Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, KNRRY has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while KNRRY trades at $24.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas KNRRY's P/E ratio is 32.48. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KNRRY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF is less volatile compared to KNRRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDF.
MGDDF vs SMTOY Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, SMTOY has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while SMTOY trades at $20.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas SMTOY's P/E ratio is 11.75. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SMTOY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF is less volatile compared to SMTOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDF.
MGDDF vs KNBHF Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, KNBHF has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while KNBHF trades at $98.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas KNBHF's P/E ratio is 31.61. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KNBHF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF and KNBHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MGDDF vs PTAIF Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, PTAIF has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while PTAIF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas PTAIF's P/E ratio is 5.58. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PTAIF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF is less volatile compared to PTAIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDF.
MGDDF vs PTAIY Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, PTAIY has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while PTAIY trades at $5.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas PTAIY's P/E ratio is 5.64. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PTAIY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF and PTAIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MGDDF vs HLLGY Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, HLLGY has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while HLLGY trades at $47.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas HLLGY's P/E ratio is 29.50. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HLLGY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF is less volatile compared to HLLGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDF.
MGDDF vs HLKHF Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, HLKHF has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while HLKHF trades at $92.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas HLKHF's P/E ratio is 25.78. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HLKHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF is less volatile compared to HLKHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDF.
MGDDF vs ASEKY Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, ASEKY has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while ASEKY trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas ASEKY's P/E ratio is 13.16. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ASEKY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF and ASEKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MGDDF vs ASEKF Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, ASEKF has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while ASEKF trades at $10.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas ASEKF's P/E ratio is 10.61. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ASEKF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF and ASEKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MGDDF vs NGKSY Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, NGKSY has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while NGKSY trades at $17.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas NGKSY's P/E ratio is 10.71. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NGKSY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF is less volatile compared to NGKSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDF.
MGDDF vs SFFLY Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, SFFLY has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while SFFLY trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas SFFLY's P/E ratio is -5.43. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SFFLY's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF is less volatile compared to SFFLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDF.
MGDDF vs PLLIF Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, PLLIF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while PLLIF trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas PLLIF's P/E ratio is 11.40. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PLLIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF is less volatile compared to PLLIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDF.
MGDDF vs NGKSF Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, NGKSF has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while NGKSF trades at $30.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas NGKSF's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NGKSF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF is less volatile compared to NGKSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDF.
MGDDF vs YORUF Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, YORUF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while YORUF trades at $25.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas YORUF's P/E ratio is 8.68. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to YORUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF and YORUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MGDDF vs BRBOY Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, BRBOY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while BRBOY trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas BRBOY's P/E ratio is 16.51. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BRBOY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF is less volatile compared to BRBOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDF.
MGDDF vs YORUY Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, YORUY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while YORUY trades at $24.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas YORUY's P/E ratio is 6.71. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to YORUY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF is less volatile compared to YORUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDF.
MGDDF vs KOTMY Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, KOTMY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while KOTMY trades at $11.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas KOTMY's P/E ratio is 10.97. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KOTMY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF and KOTMY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MGDDF vs SCFLF Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, SCFLF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while SCFLF trades at $4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas SCFLF's P/E ratio is 9.60. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SCFLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF is less volatile compared to SCFLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDF.
MGDDF vs KOTMF Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, KOTMF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while KOTMF trades at $11.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas KOTMF's P/E ratio is 10.96. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KOTMF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF is less volatile compared to KOTMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDF.
MGDDF vs STAEY Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, STAEY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while STAEY trades at $11.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas STAEY's P/E ratio is 15.77. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to STAEY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF is less volatile compared to STAEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDF.
MGDDF vs STAEF Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, STAEF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while STAEF trades at $20.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas STAEF's P/E ratio is 14.23. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to STAEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF and STAEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MGDDF vs SMTUF Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, SMTUF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while SMTUF trades at $11.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas SMTUF's P/E ratio is -37.30. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SMTUF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF and SMTUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MGDDF vs MNTHY Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, MNTHY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while MNTHY trades at $51.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas MNTHY's P/E ratio is 9.09. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MNTHY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF is less volatile compared to MNTHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDF.
MGDDF vs BRBOF Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, BRBOF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while BRBOF trades at $8.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas BRBOF's P/E ratio is 10.32. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BRBOF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF and BRBOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MGDDF vs LIMAF Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, LIMAF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while LIMAF trades at $46.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas LIMAF's P/E ratio is 14.86. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LIMAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF is less volatile compared to LIMAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDF.
MGDDF vs VLEEF Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, VLEEF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while VLEEF trades at $10.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas VLEEF's P/E ratio is 14.28. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VLEEF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF and VLEEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MGDDF vs VLEEY Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, VLEEY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while VLEEY trades at $5.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas VLEEY's P/E ratio is 13.92. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VLEEY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF and VLEEY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MGDDF vs JELCF Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, JELCF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while JELCF trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas JELCF's P/E ratio is 9.64. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JELCF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF is less volatile compared to JELCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDF.
MGDDF vs NHKGF Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, NHKGF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while NHKGF trades at $11.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas NHKGF's P/E ratio is 7.60. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NHKGF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF is less volatile compared to NHKGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDF.
MGDDF vs TDBOF Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, TDBOF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while TDBOF trades at $13.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas TDBOF's P/E ratio is 20.66. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TDBOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF is less volatile compared to TDBOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDF.
MGDDF vs VTSCF Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, VTSCF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while VTSCF trades at $56.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas VTSCF's P/E ratio is 82.35. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VTSCF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF and VTSCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MGDDF vs NIFCY Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, NIFCY has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while NIFCY trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas NIFCY's P/E ratio is 22.72. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NIFCY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF is less volatile compared to NIFCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDF.
MGDDF vs MNTHF Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, MNTHF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while MNTHF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas MNTHF's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MNTHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF and MNTHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MGDDF vs NPSKF Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, NPSKF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while NPSKF trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas NPSKF's P/E ratio is 32.14. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NPSKF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF is less volatile compared to NPSKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDF.
MGDDF vs NPSKY Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, NPSKY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while NPSKY trades at $8.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas NPSKY's P/E ratio is 25.66. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NPSKY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF is less volatile compared to NPSKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDF.
MGDDF vs TGOSY Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, TGOSY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while TGOSY trades at $33.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas TGOSY's P/E ratio is 8.34. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TGOSY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF is less volatile compared to TGOSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDF.
MGDDF vs ARBFF Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, ARBFF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while ARBFF trades at $24.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas ARBFF's P/E ratio is 31.15. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ARBFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF is less volatile compared to ARBFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDF.
MGDDF vs JEHLY Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, JEHLY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while JEHLY trades at $20.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas JEHLY's P/E ratio is 7.27. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JEHLY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF and JEHLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MGDDF vs FURCF Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, FURCF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while FURCF trades at $9.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas FURCF's P/E ratio is -8.64. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FURCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF is less volatile compared to FURCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDF.
MGDDF vs MBUMY Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, MBUMY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while MBUMY trades at $7.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas MBUMY's P/E ratio is 27.98. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MBUMY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF and MBUMY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MGDDF vs MBUMF Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, MBUMF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while MBUMF trades at $13.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas MBUMF's P/E ratio is 18.65. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MBUMF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF is less volatile compared to MBUMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDF.
MGDDF vs GMPUF Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, GMPUF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while GMPUF trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas GMPUF's P/E ratio is 9.22. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GMPUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF and GMPUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MGDDF vs UNIEF Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, UNIEF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while UNIEF trades at $35.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas UNIEF's P/E ratio is 24.13. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UNIEF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF is less volatile compared to UNIEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDF.
MGDDF vs NTXVF Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, NTXVF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while NTXVF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas NTXVF's P/E ratio is 31.40. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NTXVF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF is less volatile compared to NTXVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDF.
MGDDF vs FAURY Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, FAURY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while FAURY trades at $1.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas FAURY's P/E ratio is -7.15. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FAURY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF and FAURY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MGDDF vs PASTF Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, PASTF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while PASTF trades at $9.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas PASTF's P/E ratio is 8.05. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PASTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF is less volatile compared to PASTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDF.
MGDDF vs NKRKY Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, NKRKY has a market cap of 962.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while NKRKY trades at $3.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas NKRKY's P/E ratio is -23.27. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NKRKY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF and NKRKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MGDDF vs NKRKF Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, NKRKF has a market cap of 958.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while NKRKF trades at $6.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas NKRKF's P/E ratio is -23.18. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NKRKF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF is less volatile compared to NKRKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDF.
MGDDF vs TIANF Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, TIANF has a market cap of 939.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while TIANF trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas TIANF's P/E ratio is 3.79. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TIANF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF is less volatile compared to TIANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDF.
MGDDF vs SFHLF Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, SFHLF has a market cap of 817.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while SFHLF trades at $18.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas SFHLF's P/E ratio is 11.12. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SFHLF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF is less volatile compared to SFHLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDF.
MGDDF vs GUDDY Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, GUDDY has a market cap of 777.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while GUDDY trades at $11.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas GUDDY's P/E ratio is 25.42. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GUDDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF and GUDDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MGDDF vs ATNNF Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, ATNNF has a market cap of 775.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while ATNNF trades at $133.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas ATNNF's P/E ratio is 12.84. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ATNNF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF is less volatile compared to ATNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDF.
MGDDF vs ABDDF Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, ABDDF has a market cap of 757.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while ABDDF trades at $33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas ABDDF's P/E ratio is 143.48. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ABDDF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF and ABDDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MGDDF vs GUDHF Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, GUDHF has a market cap of 693.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while GUDHF trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas GUDHF's P/E ratio is 13.78. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GUDHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF is less volatile compared to GUDHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDF.
MGDDF vs NMAKF Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, NMAKF has a market cap of 511.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while NMAKF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas NMAKF's P/E ratio is -17.50. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NMAKF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF is less volatile compared to NMAKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDF.
MGDDF vs FCVFF Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, FCVFF has a market cap of 509.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while FCVFF trades at $10.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas FCVFF's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FCVFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF and FCVFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MGDDF vs MRETF Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, MRETF has a market cap of 449.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while MRETF trades at $6.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas MRETF's P/E ratio is -10.84. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MRETF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF and MRETF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MGDDF vs TCISF Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, TCISF has a market cap of 420M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while TCISF trades at $12.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas TCISF's P/E ratio is 9.35. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TCISF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF and TCISF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MGDDF vs SAEOF Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, SAEOF has a market cap of 401.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while SAEOF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas SAEOF's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SAEOF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF and SAEOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MGDDF vs VTSCY Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, VTSCY has a market cap of 400.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while VTSCY trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas VTSCY's P/E ratio is 76.92. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VTSCY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF and VTSCY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MGDDF vs PWRHF Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, PWRHF has a market cap of 371.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while PWRHF trades at $3.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas PWRHF's P/E ratio is 23.06. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PWRHF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF is less volatile compared to PWRHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDF.
MGDDF vs ELLRY Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, ELLRY has a market cap of 335.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while ELLRY trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas ELLRY's P/E ratio is -1.98. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ELLRY's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF and ELLRY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MGDDF vs AMGRF Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, AMGRF has a market cap of 325.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while AMGRF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas AMGRF's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AMGRF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF is less volatile compared to AMGRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDF.
MGDDF vs EGKLF Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, EGKLF has a market cap of 302.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while EGKLF trades at $4.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas EGKLF's P/E ratio is -1.81. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EGKLF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF is less volatile compared to EGKLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDF.
MGDDF vs NPSGF Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, NPSGF has a market cap of 294.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while NPSGF trades at $3.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas NPSGF's P/E ratio is 6.31. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NPSGF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF is less volatile compared to NPSGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDF.
MGDDF vs IOCJY Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, IOCJY has a market cap of 247.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while IOCJY trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas IOCJY's P/E ratio is 6.11. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IOCJY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF and IOCJY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MGDDF vs NPSGY Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, NPSGY has a market cap of 245.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while NPSGY trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas NPSGY's P/E ratio is -1.81. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NPSGY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF is less volatile compared to NPSGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDF.
MGDDF vs XNGIF Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, XNGIF has a market cap of 244.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while XNGIF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas XNGIF's P/E ratio is 6.43. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to XNGIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF and XNGIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MGDDF vs AKBIF Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, AKBIF has a market cap of 192.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while AKBIF trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas AKBIF's P/E ratio is 10.14. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AKBIF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF is less volatile compared to AKBIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDF.
MGDDF vs EXCOF Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, EXCOF has a market cap of 190.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while EXCOF trades at $4.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas EXCOF's P/E ratio is 9.96. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EXCOF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF and EXCOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MGDDF vs WLMTF Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, WLMTF has a market cap of 164.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while WLMTF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas WLMTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WLMTF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF and WLMTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MGDDF vs SCTH Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, SCTH has a market cap of 163.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while SCTH trades at $4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas SCTH's P/E ratio is -464.00. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SCTH's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF and SCTH have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MGDDF vs HWAFF Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, HWAFF has a market cap of 158M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while HWAFF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas HWAFF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HWAFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF and HWAFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MGDDF vs KGAUF Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, KGAUF has a market cap of 148.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while KGAUF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas KGAUF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KGAUF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF is less volatile compared to KGAUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDF.
MGDDF vs FESTF Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, FESTF has a market cap of 101.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while FESTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas FESTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FESTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF is less volatile compared to FESTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDF.
MGDDF vs CAOHF Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, CAOHF has a market cap of 61.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while CAOHF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas CAOHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CAOHF's ROE of -14.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF and CAOHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MGDDF vs LEAT Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, LEAT has a market cap of 56M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while LEAT trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas LEAT's P/E ratio is -180.00. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LEAT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF is less volatile compared to LEAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDF.
MGDDF vs STSGF Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, STSGF has a market cap of 38.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while STSGF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas STSGF's P/E ratio is 19.36. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to STSGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF and STSGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MGDDF vs NWFAF Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, NWFAF has a market cap of 37.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while NWFAF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas NWFAF's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NWFAF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF and NWFAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MGDDF vs NFGRF Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, NFGRF has a market cap of 33.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while NFGRF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas NFGRF's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NFGRF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF is less volatile compared to NFGRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDF.
MGDDF vs VOAXF Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, VOAXF has a market cap of 27M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while VOAXF trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas VOAXF's P/E ratio is -3.07. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VOAXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF and VOAXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MGDDF vs CREVF Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, CREVF has a market cap of 23.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while CREVF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas CREVF's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CREVF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF and CREVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MGDDF vs CCEGF Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, CCEGF has a market cap of 20.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while CCEGF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas CCEGF's P/E ratio is -9.33. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CCEGF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF is less volatile compared to CCEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDF.
MGDDF vs CMMCF Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, CMMCF has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while CMMCF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas CMMCF's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMMCF's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF is less volatile compared to CMMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDF.
MGDDF vs ATHHF Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, ATHHF has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while ATHHF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas ATHHF's P/E ratio is -6.80. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ATHHF's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF and ATHHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MGDDF vs UFMG Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, UFMG has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while UFMG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas UFMG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UFMG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF and UFMG have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MGDDF vs AFFL Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, AFFL has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while AFFL trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas AFFL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AFFL's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF is less volatile compared to AFFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDF.
MGDDF vs OPTI Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, OPTI has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while OPTI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas OPTI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OPTI's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF is less volatile compared to OPTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDF.
MGDDF vs AMTY Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, AMTY has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while AMTY trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas AMTY's P/E ratio is 3.13. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AMTY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF is less volatile compared to AMTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGDDF.
MGDDF vs SPKTF Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, SPKTF has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while SPKTF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas SPKTF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SPKTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF and SPKTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MGDDF vs CDTI Comparison
MGDDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGDDF stands at 27.6B. In comparison, CDTI has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MGDDF is priced at $39.16, while CDTI trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGDDF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.51, whereas CDTI's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, MGDDF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CDTI's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MGDDF and CDTI have similar daily volatility (0.00).