Morinaga&Co., Ltd.
Morinaga&Co., Ltd. (MGAAF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MGAAF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Food Confectioners Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MGAAF | $15.51 | +0.00% | 1.3B | 20.96 | $0.74 | +4.00% |
| LDSVF | $14,200.00 | -1.33% | 35.1B | 40.11 | $354.03 | +1.32% |
| COCXF | $110,001.20 | +759.38% | 34.3B | 31.04 | $3,543.34 | +1.70% |
| CHLSY | $13.57 | -3.42% | 33.5B | 39.71 | $0.35 | +1.56% |
| BYCBF | $1,885.00 | +0.00% | 10.3B | 43.35 | $43.48 | +1.93% |
| BRRLY | $17.95 | +2.28% | 9.9B | 41.80 | $0.43 | +0.92% |
| CLOEF | $3.71 | -35.89% | 1B | 12.37 | $0.30 | +3.03% |
| UELKY | $27.11 | +0.41% | 1B | 7.21 | $3.76 | +7.61% |
| HCHOF | $4.68 | +4.00% | 658.9M | -78.00 | -$0.06 | N/A |
| RSGUF | $4.84 | -0.37% | 620M | 11.25 | $0.43 | +5.35% |
Stock Comparison
MGAAF vs LDSVF Comparison March 2026
MGAAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGAAF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, LDSVF has a market cap of 35.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MGAAF is priced at $15.51, while LDSVF trades at $14,200.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas LDSVF's P/E ratio is 40.11. In terms of profitability, MGAAF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LDSVF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MGAAF and LDSVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LDSVF's competition here
MGAAF vs COCXF Comparison March 2026
MGAAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGAAF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, COCXF has a market cap of 34.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MGAAF is priced at $15.51, while COCXF trades at $110,001.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas COCXF's P/E ratio is 31.04. In terms of profitability, MGAAF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to COCXF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MGAAF is less volatile compared to COCXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGAAF.Check COCXF's competition here
MGAAF vs CHLSY Comparison March 2026
MGAAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGAAF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CHLSY has a market cap of 33.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MGAAF is priced at $15.51, while CHLSY trades at $13.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas CHLSY's P/E ratio is 39.71. In terms of profitability, MGAAF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CHLSY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MGAAF and CHLSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CHLSY's competition here
MGAAF vs BYCBF Comparison March 2026
MGAAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGAAF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BYCBF has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MGAAF is priced at $15.51, while BYCBF trades at $1,885.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas BYCBF's P/E ratio is 43.35. In terms of profitability, MGAAF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BYCBF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MGAAF and BYCBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BYCBF's competition here
MGAAF vs BRRLY Comparison March 2026
MGAAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGAAF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BRRLY has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MGAAF is priced at $15.51, while BRRLY trades at $17.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas BRRLY's P/E ratio is 41.80. In terms of profitability, MGAAF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BRRLY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MGAAF is less volatile compared to BRRLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGAAF.Check BRRLY's competition here
MGAAF vs CLOEF Comparison March 2026
MGAAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGAAF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CLOEF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, MGAAF is priced at $15.51, while CLOEF trades at $3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas CLOEF's P/E ratio is 12.37. In terms of profitability, MGAAF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CLOEF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MGAAF and CLOEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CLOEF's competition here
MGAAF vs UELKY Comparison March 2026
MGAAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGAAF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, UELKY has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, MGAAF is priced at $15.51, while UELKY trades at $27.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas UELKY's P/E ratio is 7.21. In terms of profitability, MGAAF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to UELKY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MGAAF and UELKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UELKY's competition here
MGAAF vs HCHOF Comparison March 2026
MGAAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGAAF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HCHOF has a market cap of 658.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MGAAF is priced at $15.51, while HCHOF trades at $4.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas HCHOF's P/E ratio is -78.00. In terms of profitability, MGAAF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HCHOF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MGAAF and HCHOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HCHOF's competition here
MGAAF vs RSGUF Comparison March 2026
MGAAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGAAF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, RSGUF has a market cap of 620M. Regarding current trading prices, MGAAF is priced at $15.51, while RSGUF trades at $4.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas RSGUF's P/E ratio is 11.25. In terms of profitability, MGAAF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RSGUF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MGAAF is less volatile compared to RSGUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGAAF.Check RSGUF's competition here
MGAAF vs PEFDF Comparison March 2026
MGAAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGAAF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PEFDF has a market cap of 449.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MGAAF is priced at $15.51, while PEFDF trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas PEFDF's P/E ratio is 14.70. In terms of profitability, MGAAF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PEFDF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MGAAF and PEFDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PEFDF's competition here
MGAAF vs QQFSF Comparison March 2026
MGAAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGAAF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, QQFSF has a market cap of 107.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MGAAF is priced at $15.51, while QQFSF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas QQFSF's P/E ratio is -8.87. In terms of profitability, MGAAF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to QQFSF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MGAAF is less volatile compared to QQFSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGAAF.Check QQFSF's competition here
MGAAF vs FVGCF Comparison March 2026
MGAAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGAAF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FVGCF has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MGAAF is priced at $15.51, while FVGCF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas FVGCF's P/E ratio is -3.73. In terms of profitability, MGAAF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FVGCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MGAAF and FVGCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FVGCF's competition here
MGAAF vs RLGDF Comparison March 2026
MGAAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGAAF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, RLGDF has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MGAAF is priced at $15.51, while RLGDF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas RLGDF's P/E ratio is 0.21. In terms of profitability, MGAAF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RLGDF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MGAAF and RLGDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RLGDF's competition here
MGAAF vs YWGRF Comparison March 2026
MGAAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGAAF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, YWGRF has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MGAAF is priced at $15.51, while YWGRF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas YWGRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MGAAF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to YWGRF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MGAAF and YWGRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YWGRF's competition here
MGAAF vs GUMYF Comparison March 2026
MGAAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGAAF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GUMYF has a market cap of 654.9K. Regarding current trading prices, MGAAF is priced at $15.51, while GUMYF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas GUMYF's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, MGAAF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GUMYF's ROE of -2.87%. Regarding short-term risk, MGAAF and GUMYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GUMYF's competition here
MGAAF vs GNGR Comparison March 2026
MGAAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGAAF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GNGR has a market cap of 109.4K. Regarding current trading prices, MGAAF is priced at $15.51, while GNGR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas GNGR's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, MGAAF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GNGR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MGAAF and GNGR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GNGR's competition here
MGAAF vs EVRN Comparison March 2026
MGAAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGAAF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, EVRN has a market cap of 32K. Regarding current trading prices, MGAAF is priced at $15.51, while EVRN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas EVRN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MGAAF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EVRN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MGAAF and EVRN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EVRN's competition here
MGAAF vs HWVI Comparison March 2026
MGAAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGAAF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HWVI has a market cap of 11.5K. Regarding current trading prices, MGAAF is priced at $15.51, while HWVI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas HWVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MGAAF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HWVI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MGAAF and HWVI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HWVI's competition here
MGAAF vs GUMYD Comparison March 2026
MGAAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGAAF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GUMYD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MGAAF is priced at $15.51, while GUMYD trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas GUMYD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MGAAF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GUMYD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MGAAF and GUMYD have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GUMYD's competition here
MGAAF vs ASCS Comparison March 2026
MGAAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGAAF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ASCS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MGAAF is priced at $15.51, while ASCS trades at $5,500.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas ASCS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MGAAF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ASCS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MGAAF and ASCS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ASCS's competition here