Morinaga&Co., Ltd.
Morinaga&Co., Ltd. MGAAF Peers
See (MGAAF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Food Confectioners Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MGAAF | $15.51 | N/A | 1.3B | 20.96 | $0.74 | +0.02% |
| COCXF | $110,001.20 | +759.38% | 449.8B | 31.24 | $3,520.70 | +1.66% |
| LDSVF | $16,611.82 | +3.82% | 38.1B | 47.19 | $352.00 | +1.37% |
| BRRLY | $10.75 | -0.83% | 5.9B | 33.58 | $0.32 | +3.64% |
| BYCBF | $1,023.20 | N/A | 5.6B | 32.12 | $31.86 | +3.84% |
| CHLSY | $16.82 | -1.35% | 3.9B | 48.06 | $0.35 | +1.31% |
| CLOEF | $3.70 | N/A | 1B | 16.09 | $0.23 | +3.01% |
| UELKY | $26.23 | N/A | 968.6M | 5.57 | $4.71 | N/A |
| HCHOF | $4.68 | +4.00% | 658.9M | -78.00 | -$0.06 | N/A |
| RSGUF | $4.12 | N/A | 527.6M | 12.48 | $0.33 | +6.25% |
Stock Comparison
MGAAF vs COCXF Comparison
MGAAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGAAF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, COCXF has a market cap of 449.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MGAAF is priced at $15.51, while COCXF trades at $110,001.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas COCXF's P/E ratio is 31.24. In terms of profitability, MGAAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to COCXF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MGAAF is more volatile compared to COCXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGAAF.
MGAAF vs LDSVF Comparison
MGAAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGAAF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, LDSVF has a market cap of 38.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MGAAF is priced at $15.51, while LDSVF trades at $16,611.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas LDSVF's P/E ratio is 47.19. In terms of profitability, MGAAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LDSVF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MGAAF is more volatile compared to LDSVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGAAF.
MGAAF vs BRRLY Comparison
MGAAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGAAF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BRRLY has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MGAAF is priced at $15.51, while BRRLY trades at $10.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas BRRLY's P/E ratio is 33.58. In terms of profitability, MGAAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BRRLY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MGAAF is more volatile compared to BRRLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGAAF.
MGAAF vs BYCBF Comparison
MGAAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGAAF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BYCBF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MGAAF is priced at $15.51, while BYCBF trades at $1,023.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas BYCBF's P/E ratio is 32.12. In terms of profitability, MGAAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BYCBF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MGAAF is more volatile compared to BYCBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGAAF.
MGAAF vs CHLSY Comparison
MGAAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGAAF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CHLSY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MGAAF is priced at $15.51, while CHLSY trades at $16.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas CHLSY's P/E ratio is 48.06. In terms of profitability, MGAAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CHLSY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MGAAF is more volatile compared to CHLSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGAAF.
MGAAF vs CLOEF Comparison
MGAAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGAAF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CLOEF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, MGAAF is priced at $15.51, while CLOEF trades at $3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas CLOEF's P/E ratio is 16.09. In terms of profitability, MGAAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CLOEF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MGAAF is more volatile compared to CLOEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGAAF.
MGAAF vs UELKY Comparison
MGAAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGAAF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, UELKY has a market cap of 968.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MGAAF is priced at $15.51, while UELKY trades at $26.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas UELKY's P/E ratio is 5.57. In terms of profitability, MGAAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UELKY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MGAAF is more volatile compared to UELKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGAAF.
MGAAF vs HCHOF Comparison
MGAAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGAAF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HCHOF has a market cap of 658.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MGAAF is priced at $15.51, while HCHOF trades at $4.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas HCHOF's P/E ratio is -78.00. In terms of profitability, MGAAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HCHOF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MGAAF is more volatile compared to HCHOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGAAF.
MGAAF vs RSGUF Comparison
MGAAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGAAF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, RSGUF has a market cap of 527.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MGAAF is priced at $15.51, while RSGUF trades at $4.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas RSGUF's P/E ratio is 12.48. In terms of profitability, MGAAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RSGUF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MGAAF is more volatile compared to RSGUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGAAF.
MGAAF vs PEFDF Comparison
MGAAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGAAF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PEFDF has a market cap of 360.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MGAAF is priced at $15.51, while PEFDF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas PEFDF's P/E ratio is 9.83. In terms of profitability, MGAAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PEFDF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MGAAF is more volatile compared to PEFDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGAAF.
MGAAF vs QQFSF Comparison
MGAAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGAAF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, QQFSF has a market cap of 123.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MGAAF is priced at $15.51, while QQFSF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas QQFSF's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, MGAAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to QQFSF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MGAAF is more volatile compared to QQFSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGAAF.
MGAAF vs FVGCF Comparison
MGAAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGAAF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FVGCF has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MGAAF is priced at $15.51, while FVGCF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas FVGCF's P/E ratio is -3.73. In terms of profitability, MGAAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FVGCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MGAAF is more volatile compared to FVGCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGAAF.
MGAAF vs RLGDF Comparison
MGAAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGAAF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, RLGDF has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MGAAF is priced at $15.51, while RLGDF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas RLGDF's P/E ratio is 0.21. In terms of profitability, MGAAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RLGDF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MGAAF is more volatile compared to RLGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGAAF.
MGAAF vs YWGRF Comparison
MGAAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGAAF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, YWGRF has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MGAAF is priced at $15.51, while YWGRF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas YWGRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MGAAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to YWGRF's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MGAAF is more volatile compared to YWGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGAAF.
MGAAF vs GUMYF Comparison
MGAAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGAAF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GUMYF has a market cap of 654.9K. Regarding current trading prices, MGAAF is priced at $15.51, while GUMYF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas GUMYF's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, MGAAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GUMYF's ROE of -2.87%. Regarding short-term risk, MGAAF is more volatile compared to GUMYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGAAF.
MGAAF vs GNGR Comparison
MGAAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGAAF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GNGR has a market cap of 109.4K. Regarding current trading prices, MGAAF is priced at $15.51, while GNGR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas GNGR's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, MGAAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GNGR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MGAAF is more volatile compared to GNGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGAAF.
MGAAF vs EVRN Comparison
MGAAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGAAF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, EVRN has a market cap of 32K. Regarding current trading prices, MGAAF is priced at $15.51, while EVRN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas EVRN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MGAAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EVRN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MGAAF is more volatile compared to EVRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGAAF.
MGAAF vs HWVI Comparison
MGAAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGAAF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HWVI has a market cap of 11.5K. Regarding current trading prices, MGAAF is priced at $15.51, while HWVI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas HWVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MGAAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HWVI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MGAAF is more volatile compared to HWVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGAAF.
MGAAF vs ASCS Comparison
MGAAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGAAF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ASCS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MGAAF is priced at $15.51, while ASCS trades at $5,500.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas ASCS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MGAAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ASCS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MGAAF is more volatile compared to ASCS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGAAF.
MGAAF vs GUMYD Comparison
MGAAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGAAF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GUMYD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MGAAF is priced at $15.51, while GUMYD trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas GUMYD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MGAAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GUMYD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MGAAF is more volatile compared to GUMYD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGAAF.