Maple Leaf Foods Inc.

MFI.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MFI.TO stands at 3.31B. In comparison, SAP.TO has a market cap of 10.84B. Regarding current trading prices, MFI.TO is priced at $26.69, while SAP.TO trades at $26.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MFI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 34.22, whereas SAP.TO's P/E ratio is -70.46. In terms of profitability, MFI.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SAP.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MFI.TO is more volatile compared to SAP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFI.TO.

MFI.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MFI.TO stands at 3.31B. In comparison, PBH.TO has a market cap of 3.73B. Regarding current trading prices, MFI.TO is priced at $26.69, while PBH.TO trades at $83.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MFI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 34.22, whereas PBH.TO's P/E ratio is 30.56. In terms of profitability, MFI.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PBH.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MFI.TO is more volatile compared to PBH.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFI.TO.

MFI.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MFI.TO stands at 3.31B. In comparison, JWEL.TO has a market cap of 1.40B. Regarding current trading prices, MFI.TO is priced at $26.69, while JWEL.TO trades at $33.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MFI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 34.22, whereas JWEL.TO's P/E ratio is 28.15. In terms of profitability, MFI.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JWEL.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MFI.TO is less volatile compared to JWEL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFI.TO.

MFI.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MFI.TO stands at 3.31B. In comparison, SOY.TO has a market cap of 994.41M. Regarding current trading prices, MFI.TO is priced at $26.69, while SOY.TO trades at $8.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MFI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 34.22, whereas SOY.TO's P/E ratio is -60.43. In terms of profitability, MFI.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SOY.TO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MFI.TO is less volatile compared to SOY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFI.TO.

MFI.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MFI.TO stands at 3.31B. In comparison, HLF.TO has a market cap of 489.73M. Regarding current trading prices, MFI.TO is priced at $26.69, while HLF.TO trades at $16.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MFI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 34.22, whereas HLF.TO's P/E ratio is 6.34. In terms of profitability, MFI.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HLF.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MFI.TO is more volatile compared to HLF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFI.TO.

MFI.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MFI.TO stands at 3.31B. In comparison, BOIL.CN has a market cap of 214.62M. Regarding current trading prices, MFI.TO is priced at $26.69, while BOIL.CN trades at $3.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MFI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 34.22, whereas BOIL.CN's P/E ratio is -29.17. In terms of profitability, MFI.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BOIL.CN's ROE of -2.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MFI.TO is more volatile compared to BOIL.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFI.TO.

MFI.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MFI.TO stands at 3.31B. In comparison, HBFG.CN has a market cap of 133.01M. Regarding current trading prices, MFI.TO is priced at $26.69, while HBFG.CN trades at $1.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MFI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 34.22, whereas HBFG.CN's P/E ratio is -52.50. In terms of profitability, MFI.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HBFG.CN's ROE of -1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MFI.TO is less volatile compared to HBFG.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFI.TO.

MFI.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MFI.TO stands at 3.31B. In comparison, FRSH.CN has a market cap of 44.35M. Regarding current trading prices, MFI.TO is priced at $26.69, while FRSH.CN trades at $0.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MFI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 34.22, whereas FRSH.CN's P/E ratio is -6.54. In terms of profitability, MFI.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FRSH.CN's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MFI.TO is more volatile compared to FRSH.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFI.TO.

MFI.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MFI.TO stands at 3.31B. In comparison, SWP.TO has a market cap of 29.22M. Regarding current trading prices, MFI.TO is priced at $26.69, while SWP.TO trades at $3.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MFI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 34.22, whereas SWP.TO's P/E ratio is 23.62. In terms of profitability, MFI.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SWP.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MFI.TO is more volatile compared to SWP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFI.TO.

MFI.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MFI.TO stands at 3.31B. In comparison, BU.TO has a market cap of 25.38M. Regarding current trading prices, MFI.TO is priced at $26.69, while BU.TO trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MFI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 34.22, whereas BU.TO's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, MFI.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BU.TO's ROE of -3.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MFI.TO is less volatile compared to BU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFI.TO.

MFI.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MFI.TO stands at 3.31B. In comparison, NPRA.CN has a market cap of 12.50M. Regarding current trading prices, MFI.TO is priced at $26.69, while NPRA.CN trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MFI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 34.22, whereas NPRA.CN's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, MFI.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NPRA.CN's ROE of +1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MFI.TO is more volatile compared to NPRA.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFI.TO.

MFI.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MFI.TO stands at 3.31B. In comparison, ELMT.CN has a market cap of 10.65M. Regarding current trading prices, MFI.TO is priced at $26.69, while ELMT.CN trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MFI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 34.22, whereas ELMT.CN's P/E ratio is -1.29. In terms of profitability, MFI.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ELMT.CN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MFI.TO is less volatile compared to ELMT.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFI.TO.

MFI.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MFI.TO stands at 3.31B. In comparison, GFCO.CN has a market cap of 10.49M. Regarding current trading prices, MFI.TO is priced at $26.69, while GFCO.CN trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MFI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 34.22, whereas GFCO.CN's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, MFI.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GFCO.CN's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, MFI.TO is more volatile compared to GFCO.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFI.TO.

MFI.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MFI.TO stands at 3.31B. In comparison, PNGA.CN has a market cap of 9.15M. Regarding current trading prices, MFI.TO is priced at $26.69, while PNGA.CN trades at $0.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MFI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 34.22, whereas PNGA.CN's P/E ratio is -2.63. In terms of profitability, MFI.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PNGA.CN's ROE of +2.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MFI.TO is more volatile compared to PNGA.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFI.TO.

MFI.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MFI.TO stands at 3.31B. In comparison, BABY.TO has a market cap of 4.68M. Regarding current trading prices, MFI.TO is priced at $26.69, while BABY.TO trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MFI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 34.22, whereas BABY.TO's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, MFI.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BABY.TO's ROE of -3.79%. Regarding short-term risk, MFI.TO is less volatile compared to BABY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFI.TO.

MFI.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MFI.TO stands at 3.31B. In comparison, PSYC.CN has a market cap of 4.33M. Regarding current trading prices, MFI.TO is priced at $26.69, while PSYC.CN trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MFI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 34.22, whereas PSYC.CN's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, MFI.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PSYC.CN's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, MFI.TO is more volatile compared to PSYC.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFI.TO.

MFI.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MFI.TO stands at 3.31B. In comparison, LLP.CN has a market cap of 4.14M. Regarding current trading prices, MFI.TO is priced at $26.69, while LLP.CN trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MFI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 34.22, whereas LLP.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, MFI.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LLP.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MFI.TO is more volatile compared to LLP.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFI.TO.

MFI.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MFI.TO stands at 3.31B. In comparison, EMRG.CN has a market cap of 3.92M. Regarding current trading prices, MFI.TO is priced at $26.69, while EMRG.CN trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MFI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 34.22, whereas EMRG.CN's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, MFI.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EMRG.CN's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MFI.TO is more volatile compared to EMRG.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFI.TO.

MFI.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MFI.TO stands at 3.31B. In comparison, MOOO.CN has a market cap of 2.07M. Regarding current trading prices, MFI.TO is priced at $26.69, while MOOO.CN trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MFI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 34.22, whereas MOOO.CN's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, MFI.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MOOO.CN's ROE of -19.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MFI.TO is less volatile compared to MOOO.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFI.TO.

MFI.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MFI.TO stands at 3.31B. In comparison, BITE.CN has a market cap of 1.73M. Regarding current trading prices, MFI.TO is priced at $26.69, while BITE.CN trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MFI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 34.22, whereas BITE.CN's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, MFI.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BITE.CN's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, MFI.TO is less volatile compared to BITE.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFI.TO.

MFI.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MFI.TO stands at 3.31B. In comparison, CULT.CN has a market cap of 1.57M. Regarding current trading prices, MFI.TO is priced at $26.69, while CULT.CN trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MFI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 34.22, whereas CULT.CN's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, MFI.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CULT.CN's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MFI.TO is more volatile compared to CULT.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFI.TO.

MFI.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MFI.TO stands at 3.31B. In comparison, MEAT.CN has a market cap of 1.23M. Regarding current trading prices, MFI.TO is priced at $26.69, while MEAT.CN trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MFI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 34.22, whereas MEAT.CN's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, MFI.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MEAT.CN's ROE of +0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, MFI.TO is less volatile compared to MEAT.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFI.TO.

MFI.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MFI.TO stands at 3.31B. In comparison, PLBL.NE has a market cap of 948750.00. Regarding current trading prices, MFI.TO is priced at $26.69, while PLBL.NE trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MFI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 34.22, whereas PLBL.NE's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, MFI.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PLBL.NE's ROE of -1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, MFI.TO is more volatile compared to PLBL.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFI.TO.

MFI.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MFI.TO stands at 3.31B. In comparison, VEGI.CN has a market cap of 699735.00. Regarding current trading prices, MFI.TO is priced at $26.69, while VEGI.CN trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MFI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 34.22, whereas VEGI.CN's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, MFI.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VEGI.CN's ROE of -7.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MFI.TO is more volatile compared to VEGI.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFI.TO.

MFI.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MFI.TO stands at 3.31B. In comparison, FIT.CN has a market cap of 473648.00. Regarding current trading prices, MFI.TO is priced at $26.69, while FIT.CN trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MFI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 34.22, whereas FIT.CN's P/E ratio is 0.12. In terms of profitability, MFI.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FIT.CN's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MFI.TO is more volatile compared to FIT.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFI.TO.

MFI.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MFI.TO stands at 3.31B. In comparison, VAGN.CN has a market cap of 436888.00. Regarding current trading prices, MFI.TO is priced at $26.69, while VAGN.CN trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MFI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 34.22, whereas VAGN.CN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, MFI.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VAGN.CN's ROE of -15.88%. Regarding short-term risk, MFI.TO is more volatile compared to VAGN.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFI.TO.

MFI.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MFI.TO stands at 3.31B. In comparison, YUM.CN has a market cap of 349884.00. Regarding current trading prices, MFI.TO is priced at $26.69, while YUM.CN trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MFI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 34.22, whereas YUM.CN's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, MFI.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to YUM.CN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MFI.TO is more volatile compared to YUM.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFI.TO.

MFI.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MFI.TO stands at 3.31B. In comparison, ARTO.CN has a market cap of 326112.00. Regarding current trading prices, MFI.TO is priced at $26.69, while ARTO.CN trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MFI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 34.22, whereas ARTO.CN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, MFI.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ARTO.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MFI.TO is more volatile compared to ARTO.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFI.TO.

MFI.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MFI.TO stands at 3.31B. In comparison, VEJI.CN has a market cap of 271554.00. Regarding current trading prices, MFI.TO is priced at $26.69, while VEJI.CN trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MFI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 34.22, whereas VEJI.CN's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MFI.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VEJI.CN's ROE of -42.78%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. MFI.TO has daily volatility of 4.76 and VEJI.CN has daily volatility of N/A.

MFI.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MFI.TO stands at 3.31B. In comparison, MEAL.CN has a market cap of 242129.00. Regarding current trading prices, MFI.TO is priced at $26.69, while MEAL.CN trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MFI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 34.22, whereas MEAL.CN's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, MFI.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MEAL.CN's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, MFI.TO is more volatile compared to MEAL.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFI.TO.

MFI.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MFI.TO stands at 3.31B. In comparison, FUEL.CN has a market cap of 179690.00. Regarding current trading prices, MFI.TO is priced at $26.69, while FUEL.CN trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MFI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 34.22, whereas FUEL.CN's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MFI.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FUEL.CN's ROE of -2.84%. Regarding short-term risk, MFI.TO is more volatile compared to FUEL.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFI.TO.

MFI.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MFI.TO stands at 3.31B. In comparison, RSF.CN comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MFI.TO is priced at $26.69, while RSF.CN trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MFI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 34.22, whereas RSF.CN's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, MFI.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RSF.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. MFI.TO has daily volatility of 4.76 and RSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A.