McDonald's Holdings Company (Japan), Ltd.
McDonald's Holdings Company (Japan), Ltd. MDNDF Peers
See (MDNDF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Restaurants Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDNDF | $40.66 | -3.76% | 5.4B | 24.64 | $1.65 | +0.76% |
| CMPGY | $34.91 | -0.68% | 59.1B | 40.50 | $0.86 | +1.77% |
| CMPGF | $34.79 | -0.79% | 59B | 40.45 | $0.86 | +1.74% |
| RSTRF | $71.07 | +0.00% | 32.2B | 23.93 | $2.97 | +3.38% |
| HDALF | $1.94 | -0.10% | 10.5B | 16.18 | $0.12 | +5.91% |
| JBFCY | $17.99 | +12.44% | 5B | 29.98 | $0.60 | +1.33% |
| JBFCF | $4.13 | +0.73% | 4.6B | 27.53 | $0.15 | +1.33% |
| ATGSY | $6.55 | +0.00% | 2.5B | -40.94 | -$0.16 | N/A |
| SKLYF | $10.70 | +0.00% | 2.4B | 152.86 | $0.07 | +1.25% |
| MBPFF | $3.70 | +0.00% | 2.2B | 9.74 | $0.38 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MDNDF vs CMPGY Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, CMPGY has a market cap of 59.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $40.66, while CMPGY trades at $34.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.64, whereas CMPGY's P/E ratio is 40.50. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CMPGY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is less volatile compared to CMPGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.
MDNDF vs CMPGF Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, CMPGF has a market cap of 59B. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $40.66, while CMPGF trades at $34.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.64, whereas CMPGF's P/E ratio is 40.45. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CMPGF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF and CMPGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDNDF vs RSTRF Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, RSTRF has a market cap of 32.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $40.66, while RSTRF trades at $71.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.64, whereas RSTRF's P/E ratio is 23.93. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RSTRF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF and RSTRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDNDF vs HDALF Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, HDALF has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $40.66, while HDALF trades at $1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.64, whereas HDALF's P/E ratio is 16.18. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HDALF's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF and HDALF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDNDF vs JBFCY Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, JBFCY has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $40.66, while JBFCY trades at $17.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.64, whereas JBFCY's P/E ratio is 29.98. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JBFCY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF and JBFCY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDNDF vs JBFCF Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, JBFCF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $40.66, while JBFCF trades at $4.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.64, whereas JBFCF's P/E ratio is 27.53. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JBFCF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF and JBFCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDNDF vs ATGSY Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, ATGSY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $40.66, while ATGSY trades at $6.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.64, whereas ATGSY's P/E ratio is -40.94. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ATGSY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF and ATGSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDNDF vs SKLYF Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, SKLYF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $40.66, while SKLYF trades at $10.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.64, whereas SKLYF's P/E ratio is 152.86. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SKLYF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF and SKLYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDNDF vs MBPFF Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, MBPFF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $40.66, while MBPFF trades at $3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.64, whereas MBPFF's P/E ratio is 9.74. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MBPFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF and MBPFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDNDF vs ALSSF Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, ALSSF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $40.66, while ALSSF trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.64, whereas ALSSF's P/E ratio is 67.25. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ALSSF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is less volatile compared to ALSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.
MDNDF vs ATGSF Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, ATGSF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $40.66, while ATGSF trades at $5.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.64, whereas ATGSF's P/E ratio is -37.53. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ATGSF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF and ATGSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDNDF vs SGLOF Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, SGLOF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $40.66, while SGLOF trades at $17.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.64, whereas SGLOF's P/E ratio is 29.71. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SGLOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF and SGLOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDNDF vs ARHOF Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, ARHOF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $40.66, while ARHOF trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.64, whereas ARHOF's P/E ratio is -9.57. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ARHOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF and ARHOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDNDF vs SSPPF Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, SSPPF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $40.66, while SSPPF trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.64, whereas SSPPF's P/E ratio is -53.75. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SSPPF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF and SSPPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDNDF vs HELFY Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, HELFY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $40.66, while HELFY trades at $2.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.64, whereas HELFY's P/E ratio is -7.91. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HELFY's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF and HELFY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDNDF vs HLFFF Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, HLFFF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $40.66, while HLFFF trades at $10.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.64, whereas HLFFF's P/E ratio is -7.87. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HLFFF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is less volatile compared to HLFFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.
MDNDF vs DMPZF Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, DMPZF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $40.66, while DMPZF trades at $3.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.64, whereas DMPZF's P/E ratio is 11.74. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DMPZF's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF and DMPZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDNDF vs DPUKY Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, DPUKY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $40.66, while DPUKY trades at $6.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.64, whereas DPUKY's P/E ratio is 11.22. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DPUKY's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is less volatile compared to DPUKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.
MDNDF vs LKNCY Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, LKNCY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $40.66, while LKNCY trades at $37.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.64, whereas LKNCY's P/E ratio is 24.81. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LKNCY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is less volatile compared to LKNCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.
MDNDF vs ELORY Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, ELORY has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $40.66, while ELORY trades at $4.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.64, whereas ELORY's P/E ratio is -2.48. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ELORY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF and ELORY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDNDF vs DPZUF Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, DPZUF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $40.66, while DPZUF trades at $12.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.64, whereas DPZUF's P/E ratio is 137.78. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DPZUF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF and DPZUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDNDF vs JDWPY Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, JDWPY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $40.66, while JDWPY trades at $50.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.64, whereas JDWPY's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JDWPY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF and JDWPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDNDF vs DMZPY Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, DMZPY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $40.66, while DMZPY trades at $5.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.64, whereas DMZPY's P/E ratio is 148.00. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DMZPY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is less volatile compared to DMZPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.
MDNDF vs JDWPF Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, JDWPF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $40.66, while JDWPF trades at $9.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.64, whereas JDWPF's P/E ratio is 13.93. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JDWPF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF and JDWPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDNDF vs MTYFF Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, MTYFF has a market cap of 713.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $40.66, while MTYFF trades at $29.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.64, whereas MTYFF's P/E ratio is 115.70. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MTYFF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF and MTYFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDNDF vs CLLFF Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, CLLFF has a market cap of 707.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $40.66, while CLLFF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.64, whereas CLLFF's P/E ratio is 19.35. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CLLFF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF and CLLFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDNDF vs RSTGF Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, RSTGF has a market cap of 649.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $40.66, while RSTGF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.64, whereas RSTGF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RSTGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF and RSTGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDNDF vs ELROF Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, ELROF has a market cap of 614.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $40.66, while ELROF trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.64, whereas ELROF's P/E ratio is 243.00. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ELROF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF and ELROF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDNDF vs CFCGF Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, CFCGF has a market cap of 531M. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $40.66, while CFCGF trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.64, whereas CFCGF's P/E ratio is 92.56. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CFCGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is less volatile compared to CFCGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.
MDNDF vs MLYSF Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, MLYSF has a market cap of 399M. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $40.66, while MLYSF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.64, whereas MLYSF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MLYSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF and MLYSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDNDF vs FBGI Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, FBGI has a market cap of 368.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $40.66, while FBGI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.64, whereas FBGI's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FBGI's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF and FBGI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDNDF vs MARZF Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, MARZF has a market cap of 366.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $40.66, while MARZF trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.64, whereas MARZF's P/E ratio is 5.27. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MARZF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF and MARZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDNDF vs FMBRY Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, FMBRY has a market cap of 291.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $40.66, while FMBRY trades at $5.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.64, whereas FMBRY's P/E ratio is 11.17. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FMBRY's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF and FMBRY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDNDF vs MRTPY Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, MRTPY has a market cap of 274M. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $40.66, while MRTPY trades at $4.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.64, whereas MRTPY's P/E ratio is 4.04. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MRTPY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF and MRTPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDNDF vs PZRIF Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, PZRIF has a market cap of 271.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $40.66, while PZRIF trades at $11.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.64, whereas PZRIF's P/E ratio is 15.97. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PZRIF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF and PZRIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDNDF vs RTBRF Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, RTBRF has a market cap of 199.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $40.66, while RTBRF trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.64, whereas RTBRF's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RTBRF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF and RTBRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDNDF vs CRNGF Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, CRNGF has a market cap of 172.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $40.66, while CRNGF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.64, whereas CRNGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CRNGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF and CRNGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDNDF vs DLII Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, DLII has a market cap of 168.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $40.66, while DLII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.64, whereas DLII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DLII's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF and DLII have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDNDF vs FRWDF Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, FRWDF has a market cap of 136M. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $40.66, while FRWDF trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.64, whereas FRWDF's P/E ratio is 26.25. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FRWDF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF and FRWDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDNDF vs XIAXF Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, XIAXF has a market cap of 119.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $40.66, while XIAXF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.64, whereas XIAXF's P/E ratio is -2.20. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to XIAXF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF and XIAXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDNDF vs RFGPF Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, RFGPF has a market cap of 100.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $40.66, while RFGPF trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.64, whereas RFGPF's P/E ratio is 26.67. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RFGPF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF and RFGPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDNDF vs MHGU Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, MHGU has a market cap of 81.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $40.66, while MHGU trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.64, whereas MHGU's P/E ratio is -144.44. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MHGU's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF and MHGU have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDNDF vs MHGUP Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, MHGUP has a market cap of 66.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $40.66, while MHGUP trades at $20.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.64, whereas MHGUP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MHGUP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF and MHGUP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDNDF vs FRHHF Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, FRHHF has a market cap of 50.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $40.66, while FRHHF trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.64, whereas FRHHF's P/E ratio is -6.08. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FRHHF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF and FRHHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDNDF vs TNGPF Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, TNGPF has a market cap of 47.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $40.66, while TNGPF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.64, whereas TNGPF's P/E ratio is 4.10. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TNGPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is less volatile compared to TNGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.
MDNDF vs GLLDF Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, GLLDF has a market cap of 27.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $40.66, while GLLDF trades at $2.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.64, whereas GLLDF's P/E ratio is 7.51. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GLLDF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF and GLLDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDNDF vs FCCI Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, FCCI has a market cap of 26.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $40.66, while FCCI trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.64, whereas FCCI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FCCI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF and FCCI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDNDF vs SCUPF Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, SCUPF has a market cap of 23M. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $40.66, while SCUPF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.64, whereas SCUPF's P/E ratio is 27.00. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SCUPF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF and SCUPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDNDF vs MORRF Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, MORRF has a market cap of 20.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $40.66, while MORRF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.64, whereas MORRF's P/E ratio is -2.33. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MORRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF and MORRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDNDF vs ODDAF Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, ODDAF has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $40.66, while ODDAF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.64, whereas ODDAF's P/E ratio is -11.20. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ODDAF's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF and ODDAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDNDF vs JKHCF Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, JKHCF has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $40.66, while JKHCF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.64, whereas JKHCF's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JKHCF's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is less volatile compared to JKHCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.
MDNDF vs NROM Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, NROM has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $40.66, while NROM trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.64, whereas NROM's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NROM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF and NROM have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDNDF vs COFE Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, COFE has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $40.66, while COFE trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.64, whereas COFE's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to COFE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF and COFE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDNDF vs GGLT Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, GGLT has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $40.66, while GGLT trades at $200.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.64, whereas GGLT's P/E ratio is 1.33. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GGLT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF and GGLT have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDNDF vs SCFFF Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, SCFFF has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $40.66, while SCFFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.64, whereas SCFFF's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SCFFF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF and SCFFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDNDF vs BDVB Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, BDVB has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $40.66, while BDVB trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.64, whereas BDVB's P/E ratio is -1.34. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BDVB's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is less volatile compared to BDVB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.
MDNDF vs ZAAG Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, ZAAG has a market cap of 952.8K. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $40.66, while ZAAG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.64, whereas ZAAG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ZAAG's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is less volatile compared to ZAAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.
MDNDF vs KITL Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, KITL has a market cap of 489.3K. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $40.66, while KITL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.64, whereas KITL's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KITL's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is less volatile compared to KITL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.
MDNDF vs GAMN Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, GAMN has a market cap of 408.2K. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $40.66, while GAMN trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.64, whereas GAMN's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GAMN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF and GAMN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDNDF vs WHCA Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, WHCA has a market cap of 401.8K. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $40.66, while WHCA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.64, whereas WHCA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WHCA's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF and WHCA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDNDF vs GTEH Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, GTEH has a market cap of 140K. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $40.66, while GTEH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.64, whereas GTEH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GTEH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF and GTEH have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDNDF vs BLUU Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, BLUU has a market cap of 37.3K. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $40.66, while BLUU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.64, whereas BLUU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BLUU's ROE of +3.93%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF and BLUU have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDNDF vs GMPR Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, GMPR has a market cap of 36.3K. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $40.66, while GMPR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.64, whereas GMPR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GMPR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is less volatile compared to GMPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.
MDNDF vs GASMF Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, GASMF has a market cap of 29.8K. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $40.66, while GASMF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.64, whereas GASMF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GASMF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF and GASMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDNDF vs BBUCQ Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, BBUCQ has a market cap of 17.2K. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $40.66, while BBUCQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.64, whereas BBUCQ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BBUCQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF and BBUCQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDNDF vs SWRL Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, SWRL has a market cap of 11K. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $40.66, while SWRL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.64, whereas SWRL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SWRL's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF and SWRL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDNDF vs RIBS Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, RIBS has a market cap of 9.8K. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $40.66, while RIBS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.64, whereas RIBS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RIBS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF and RIBS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDNDF vs PFSF Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, PFSF has a market cap of 3.1K. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $40.66, while PFSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.64, whereas PFSF's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PFSF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF and PFSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDNDF vs CORG Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, CORG has a market cap of 2.7K. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $40.66, while CORG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.64, whereas CORG's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CORG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is less volatile compared to CORG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.
MDNDF vs AMHG Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, AMHG has a market cap of 1.7K. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $40.66, while AMHG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.64, whereas AMHG's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AMHG's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF and AMHG have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDNDF vs GCFB Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, GCFB has a market cap of 1.4K. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $40.66, while GCFB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.64, whereas GCFB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GCFB's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF and GCFB have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDNDF vs HTRE Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, HTRE has a market cap of 171. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $40.66, while HTRE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.64, whereas HTRE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HTRE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF and HTRE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDNDF vs ULFS Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, ULFS has a market cap of 70. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $40.66, while ULFS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.64, whereas ULFS's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ULFS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF and ULFS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDNDF vs RKLC Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, RKLC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $40.66, while RKLC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.64, whereas RKLC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RKLC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF and RKLC have similar daily volatility (0.00).