McDonald's Holdings Company (Japan), Ltd.
McDonald's Holdings Company (Japan), Ltd. MDNDF Peers
See (MDNDF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Restaurants Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDNDF | $39.35 | -11.07% | 5.23B | 23.56 | $1.67 | +0.79% |
| CMPGF | $35.36 | +4.16% | 60.02B | 41.12 | $0.86 | +1.67% |
| CMPGY | $33.75 | -2.48% | 57.50B | 41.16 | $0.82 | +1.77% |
| RSTRF | $67.04 | -3.54% | 30.39B | 20.88 | $3.21 | +3.52% |
| HDALF | $1.89 | -16.00% | 10.23B | 15.75 | $0.12 | +1.15% |
| JBFCY | $18.75 | +5.04% | 5.25B | 29.76 | $0.63 | +1.32% |
| JBFCF | $4.15 | -1.19% | 4.65B | 25.94 | $0.16 | +1.32% |
| ATGSY | $6.55 | N/A | 2.50B | -40.94 | -$0.16 | N/A |
| SKLYF | $10.70 | N/A | 2.43B | 152.86 | $0.07 | +0.01% |
| DLII | $0.00 | +1200.00% | 2.19B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MDNDF vs CMPGF Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.23B. In comparison, CMPGF has a market cap of 60.02B. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $39.35, while CMPGF trades at $35.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.56, whereas CMPGF's P/E ratio is 41.12. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CMPGF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is less volatile compared to CMPGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.
MDNDF vs CMPGY Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.23B. In comparison, CMPGY has a market cap of 57.50B. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $39.35, while CMPGY trades at $33.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.56, whereas CMPGY's P/E ratio is 41.16. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CMPGY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is more volatile compared to CMPGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.
MDNDF vs RSTRF Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.23B. In comparison, RSTRF has a market cap of 30.39B. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $39.35, while RSTRF trades at $67.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.56, whereas RSTRF's P/E ratio is 20.88. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RSTRF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is less volatile compared to RSTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.
MDNDF vs HDALF Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.23B. In comparison, HDALF has a market cap of 10.23B. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $39.35, while HDALF trades at $1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.56, whereas HDALF's P/E ratio is 15.75. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HDALF's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is less volatile compared to HDALF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.
MDNDF vs JBFCY Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.23B. In comparison, JBFCY has a market cap of 5.25B. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $39.35, while JBFCY trades at $18.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.56, whereas JBFCY's P/E ratio is 29.76. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JBFCY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is more volatile compared to JBFCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.
MDNDF vs JBFCF Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.23B. In comparison, JBFCF has a market cap of 4.65B. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $39.35, while JBFCF trades at $4.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.56, whereas JBFCF's P/E ratio is 25.94. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JBFCF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is more volatile compared to JBFCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.
MDNDF vs ATGSY Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.23B. In comparison, ATGSY has a market cap of 2.50B. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $39.35, while ATGSY trades at $6.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.56, whereas ATGSY's P/E ratio is -40.94. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ATGSY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is more volatile compared to ATGSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.
MDNDF vs SKLYF Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.23B. In comparison, SKLYF has a market cap of 2.43B. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $39.35, while SKLYF trades at $10.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.56, whereas SKLYF's P/E ratio is 152.86. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SKLYF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is less volatile compared to SKLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.
MDNDF vs DLII Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.23B. In comparison, DLII has a market cap of 2.19B. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $39.35, while DLII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.56, whereas DLII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DLII's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is less volatile compared to DLII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.
MDNDF vs ATGSF Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.23B. In comparison, ATGSF has a market cap of 2.15B. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $39.35, while ATGSF trades at $5.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.56, whereas ATGSF's P/E ratio is -37.53. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ATGSF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is more volatile compared to ATGSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.
MDNDF vs SGLOF Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.23B. In comparison, SGLOF has a market cap of 2.02B. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $39.35, while SGLOF trades at $17.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.56, whereas SGLOF's P/E ratio is 29.71. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SGLOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is more volatile compared to SGLOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.
MDNDF vs ALSSF Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.23B. In comparison, ALSSF has a market cap of 1.96B. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $39.35, while ALSSF trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.56, whereas ALSSF's P/E ratio is 48.00. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ALSSF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is more volatile compared to ALSSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.
MDNDF vs HELFY Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.23B. In comparison, HELFY has a market cap of 1.87B. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $39.35, while HELFY trades at $2.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.56, whereas HELFY's P/E ratio is -9.29. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HELFY's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is more volatile compared to HELFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.
MDNDF vs HLFFF Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.23B. In comparison, HLFFF has a market cap of 1.87B. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $39.35, while HLFFF trades at $11.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.56, whereas HLFFF's P/E ratio is -9.20. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HLFFF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is less volatile compared to HLFFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.
MDNDF vs ARHOF Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.23B. In comparison, ARHOF has a market cap of 1.86B. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $39.35, while ARHOF trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.56, whereas ARHOF's P/E ratio is -9.57. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ARHOF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is more volatile compared to ARHOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.
MDNDF vs MBPFF Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.23B. In comparison, MBPFF has a market cap of 1.81B. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $39.35, while MBPFF trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.56, whereas MBPFF's P/E ratio is 9.84. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MBPFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is less volatile compared to MBPFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.
MDNDF vs DMZPY Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.23B. In comparison, DMZPY has a market cap of 1.68B. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $39.35, while DMZPY trades at $8.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.56, whereas DMZPY's P/E ratio is 204.38. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DMZPY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is more volatile compared to DMZPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.
MDNDF vs SSPPF Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.23B. In comparison, SSPPF has a market cap of 1.66B. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $39.35, while SSPPF trades at $2.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.56, whereas SSPPF's P/E ratio is 41.60. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SSPPF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is more volatile compared to SSPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.
MDNDF vs DPZUF Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.23B. In comparison, DPZUF has a market cap of 1.54B. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $39.35, while DPZUF trades at $16.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.56, whereas DPZUF's P/E ratio is 181.11. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DPZUF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is more volatile compared to DPZUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.
MDNDF vs DPUKY Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.23B. In comparison, DPUKY has a market cap of 1.49B. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $39.35, while DPUKY trades at $7.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.56, whereas DPUKY's P/E ratio is 12.46. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DPUKY's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is more volatile compared to DPUKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.
MDNDF vs DMPZF Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.23B. In comparison, DMPZF has a market cap of 1.42B. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $39.35, while DMPZF trades at $3.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.56, whereas DMPZF's P/E ratio is 12.13. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DMPZF's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is more volatile compared to DMPZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.
MDNDF vs ELORY Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.23B. In comparison, ELORY has a market cap of 1.23B. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $39.35, while ELORY trades at $4.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.56, whereas ELORY's P/E ratio is -2.48. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ELORY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is more volatile compared to ELORY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.
MDNDF vs LKNCY Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.23B. In comparison, LKNCY has a market cap of 1.13B. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $39.35, while LKNCY trades at $31.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.56, whereas LKNCY's P/E ratio is 21.01. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LKNCY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is more volatile compared to LKNCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.
MDNDF vs JDWPY Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.23B. In comparison, JDWPY has a market cap of 1.12B. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $39.35, while JDWPY trades at $50.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.56, whereas JDWPY's P/E ratio is 14.97. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JDWPY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is more volatile compared to JDWPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.
MDNDF vs JDWPF Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.23B. In comparison, JDWPF has a market cap of 1.05B. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $39.35, while JDWPF trades at $9.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.56, whereas JDWPF's P/E ratio is 14.03. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JDWPF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is less volatile compared to JDWPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.
MDNDF vs MTYFF Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.23B. In comparison, MTYFF has a market cap of 749.29M. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $39.35, while MTYFF trades at $32.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.56, whereas MTYFF's P/E ratio is 125.31. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MTYFF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is more volatile compared to MTYFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.
MDNDF vs RSTGF Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.23B. In comparison, RSTGF has a market cap of 649.69M. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $39.35, while RSTGF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.56, whereas RSTGF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RSTGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is more volatile compared to RSTGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.
MDNDF vs ELROF Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.23B. In comparison, ELROF has a market cap of 616.08M. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $39.35, while ELROF trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.56, whereas ELROF's P/E ratio is -13.50. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ELROF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is less volatile compared to ELROF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.
MDNDF vs CLLFF Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.23B. In comparison, CLLFF has a market cap of 572.91M. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $39.35, while CLLFF trades at $4.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.56, whereas CLLFF's P/E ratio is 15.68. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CLLFF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is more volatile compared to CLLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.
MDNDF vs CFCGF Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.23B. In comparison, CFCGF has a market cap of 531.02M. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $39.35, while CFCGF trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.56, whereas CFCGF's P/E ratio is 92.56. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CFCGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is more volatile compared to CFCGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.
MDNDF vs MLYSF Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.23B. In comparison, MLYSF has a market cap of 399.04M. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $39.35, while MLYSF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.56, whereas MLYSF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MLYSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is more volatile compared to MLYSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.
MDNDF vs FBGI Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.23B. In comparison, FBGI has a market cap of 368.44M. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $39.35, while FBGI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.56, whereas FBGI's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FBGI's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is more volatile compared to FBGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.
MDNDF vs FMBRY Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.23B. In comparison, FMBRY has a market cap of 291.09M. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $39.35, while FMBRY trades at $5.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.56, whereas FMBRY's P/E ratio is 11.17. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FMBRY's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is less volatile compared to FMBRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.
MDNDF vs MARZF Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.23B. In comparison, MARZF has a market cap of 285.68M. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $39.35, while MARZF trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.56, whereas MARZF's P/E ratio is 11.29. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MARZF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is less volatile compared to MARZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.
MDNDF vs MRTPY Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.23B. In comparison, MRTPY has a market cap of 274.02M. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $39.35, while MRTPY trades at $4.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.56, whereas MRTPY's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MRTPY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is more volatile compared to MRTPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.
MDNDF vs PZRIF Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.23B. In comparison, PZRIF has a market cap of 258.25M. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $39.35, while PZRIF trades at $10.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.56, whereas PZRIF's P/E ratio is 15.66. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PZRIF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is more volatile compared to PZRIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.
MDNDF vs FRWDF Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.23B. In comparison, FRWDF has a market cap of 234.49M. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $39.35, while FRWDF trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.56, whereas FRWDF's P/E ratio is 45.25. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FRWDF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is less volatile compared to FRWDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.
MDNDF vs RTBRF Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.23B. In comparison, RTBRF has a market cap of 202.11M. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $39.35, while RTBRF trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.56, whereas RTBRF's P/E ratio is 12.46. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RTBRF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is more volatile compared to RTBRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.
MDNDF vs CRNGF Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.23B. In comparison, CRNGF has a market cap of 172.85M. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $39.35, while CRNGF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.56, whereas CRNGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CRNGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is more volatile compared to CRNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.
MDNDF vs XIAXF Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.23B. In comparison, XIAXF has a market cap of 119.10M. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $39.35, while XIAXF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.56, whereas XIAXF's P/E ratio is -2.20. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to XIAXF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is less volatile compared to XIAXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.
MDNDF vs RFGPF Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.23B. In comparison, RFGPF has a market cap of 100.69M. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $39.35, while RFGPF trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.56, whereas RFGPF's P/E ratio is 26.67. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RFGPF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is less volatile compared to RFGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.
MDNDF vs MHGU Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.23B. In comparison, MHGU has a market cap of 84.87M. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $39.35, while MHGU trades at $13.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.56, whereas MHGU's P/E ratio is 17.99. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MHGU's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is less volatile compared to MHGU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.
MDNDF vs MHGUP Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.23B. In comparison, MHGUP has a market cap of 78.29M. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $39.35, while MHGUP trades at $24.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.56, whereas MHGUP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MHGUP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is more volatile compared to MHGUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.
MDNDF vs FRHHF Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.23B. In comparison, FRHHF has a market cap of 50.49M. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $39.35, while FRHHF trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.56, whereas FRHHF's P/E ratio is -6.08. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FRHHF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is more volatile compared to FRHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.
MDNDF vs TNGPF Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.23B. In comparison, TNGPF has a market cap of 47.55M. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $39.35, while TNGPF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.56, whereas TNGPF's P/E ratio is 4.10. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TNGPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is more volatile compared to TNGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.
MDNDF vs GLLDF Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.23B. In comparison, GLLDF has a market cap of 27.40M. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $39.35, while GLLDF trades at $2.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.56, whereas GLLDF's P/E ratio is 7.51. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GLLDF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is more volatile compared to GLLDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.
MDNDF vs FCCI Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.23B. In comparison, FCCI has a market cap of 26.11M. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $39.35, while FCCI trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.56, whereas FCCI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FCCI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is more volatile compared to FCCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.
MDNDF vs SCUPF Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.23B. In comparison, SCUPF has a market cap of 23.88M. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $39.35, while SCUPF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.56, whereas SCUPF's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SCUPF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is less volatile compared to SCUPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.
MDNDF vs MORRF Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.23B. In comparison, MORRF has a market cap of 20.07M. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $39.35, while MORRF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.56, whereas MORRF's P/E ratio is -2.33. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MORRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is more volatile compared to MORRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.
MDNDF vs ODDAF Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.23B. In comparison, ODDAF has a market cap of 14.77M. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $39.35, while ODDAF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.56, whereas ODDAF's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ODDAF's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is more volatile compared to ODDAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.
MDNDF vs GTEH Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.23B. In comparison, GTEH has a market cap of 14.00M. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $39.35, while GTEH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.56, whereas GTEH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GTEH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is less volatile compared to GTEH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.
MDNDF vs JKHCF Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.23B. In comparison, JKHCF has a market cap of 6.92M. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $39.35, while JKHCF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.56, whereas JKHCF's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JKHCF's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is less volatile compared to JKHCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.
MDNDF vs GGLT Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.23B. In comparison, GGLT has a market cap of 4.99M. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $39.35, while GGLT trades at $499.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.56, whereas GGLT's P/E ratio is 1.33. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GGLT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is less volatile compared to GGLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.
MDNDF vs COFE Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.23B. In comparison, COFE has a market cap of 4.80M. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $39.35, while COFE trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.56, whereas COFE's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to COFE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is more volatile compared to COFE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.
MDNDF vs NROM Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.23B. In comparison, NROM has a market cap of 4.44M. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $39.35, while NROM trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.56, whereas NROM's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NROM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is more volatile compared to NROM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.
MDNDF vs SCFFF Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.23B. In comparison, SCFFF has a market cap of 1.74M. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $39.35, while SCFFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.56, whereas SCFFF's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SCFFF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is more volatile compared to SCFFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.
MDNDF vs ZAAG Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.23B. In comparison, ZAAG has a market cap of 952803.00. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $39.35, while ZAAG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.56, whereas ZAAG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ZAAG's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is more volatile compared to ZAAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.
MDNDF vs BDVB Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.23B. In comparison, BDVB has a market cap of 764233.00. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $39.35, while BDVB trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.56, whereas BDVB's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BDVB's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is less volatile compared to BDVB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.
MDNDF vs WHCA Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.23B. In comparison, WHCA has a market cap of 401756.00. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $39.35, while WHCA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.56, whereas WHCA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WHCA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is less volatile compared to WHCA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.
MDNDF vs GAMN Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.23B. In comparison, GAMN has a market cap of 389931.00. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $39.35, while GAMN trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.56, whereas GAMN's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GAMN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is less volatile compared to GAMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.
MDNDF vs KITL Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.23B. In comparison, KITL has a market cap of 387363.00. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $39.35, while KITL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.56, whereas KITL's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KITL's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is more volatile compared to KITL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.
MDNDF vs BLUU Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.23B. In comparison, BLUU has a market cap of 37272.00. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $39.35, while BLUU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.56, whereas BLUU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BLUU's ROE of +3.93%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is less volatile compared to BLUU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.
MDNDF vs GMPR Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.23B. In comparison, GMPR has a market cap of 36282.00. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $39.35, while GMPR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.56, whereas GMPR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GMPR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is more volatile compared to GMPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.
MDNDF vs GASMF Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.23B. In comparison, GASMF has a market cap of 29755.00. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $39.35, while GASMF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.56, whereas GASMF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GASMF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is more volatile compared to GASMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.
MDNDF vs BBUCQ Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.23B. In comparison, BBUCQ has a market cap of 17240.00. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $39.35, while BBUCQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.56, whereas BBUCQ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BBUCQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is more volatile compared to BBUCQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.
MDNDF vs SWRL Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.23B. In comparison, SWRL has a market cap of 11033.00. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $39.35, while SWRL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.56, whereas SWRL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SWRL's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is less volatile compared to SWRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.
MDNDF vs RIBS Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.23B. In comparison, RIBS has a market cap of 9755.00. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $39.35, while RIBS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.56, whereas RIBS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RIBS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is more volatile compared to RIBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.
MDNDF vs PFSF Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.23B. In comparison, PFSF has a market cap of 5136.00. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $39.35, while PFSF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.56, whereas PFSF's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PFSF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is more volatile compared to PFSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.
MDNDF vs CORG Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.23B. In comparison, CORG has a market cap of 2722.00. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $39.35, while CORG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.56, whereas CORG's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CORG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is less volatile compared to CORG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.
MDNDF vs AMHG Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.23B. In comparison, AMHG has a market cap of 1683.00. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $39.35, while AMHG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.56, whereas AMHG's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AMHG's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is more volatile compared to AMHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.
MDNDF vs GCFB Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.23B. In comparison, GCFB has a market cap of 1436.00. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $39.35, while GCFB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.56, whereas GCFB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GCFB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is more volatile compared to GCFB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.
MDNDF vs HTRE Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.23B. In comparison, HTRE has a market cap of 171.00. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $39.35, while HTRE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.56, whereas HTRE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HTRE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is more volatile compared to HTRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.
MDNDF vs ULFS Comparison
MDNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDNDF stands at 5.23B. In comparison, ULFS has a market cap of 70.00. Regarding current trading prices, MDNDF is priced at $39.35, while ULFS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.56, whereas ULFS's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MDNDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ULFS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MDNDF is more volatile compared to ULFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDNDF.