MDA Ltd.
MDA Ltd. (MDA.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MDA.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Aerospace & Defense Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDA.TO | CA$34.52 | -6.58% | 4.4B | 41.10 | CA$0.84 | N/A |
| BBD-A.TO | CA$238.61 | -1.64% | 23.6B | 18.45 | CA$12.93 | N/A |
| BBD-B.TO | CA$237.37 | -0.81% | 23.5B | 18.37 | CA$12.92 | N/A |
| CAE.TO | CA$35.86 | -1.46% | 11.5B | 30.39 | CA$1.18 | N/A |
| BBD-PB.TO | CA$18.10 | +0.00% | 9.2B | -4.08 | -CA$4.43 | N/A |
| BBD-PC.TO | CA$25.00 | -0.79% | 6.8B | -5.64 | -CA$4.43 | N/A |
| MAL.TO | CA$20.48 | -1.06% | 1.2B | 25.92 | CA$0.79 | +0.98% |
| HRX.TO | CA$32.48 | +0.00% | 1.1B | 21.23 | CA$1.53 | N/A |
| FTG.TO | CA$17.39 | +1.87% | 437.8M | 33.44 | CA$0.52 | N/A |
| RHM.NE | CA$8.03 | -3.37% | 371.6M | 0.23 | CA$35.62 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MDA.TO vs BBD-A.TO Comparison April 2026
MDA.TO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDA.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, BBD-A.TO has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MDA.TO is priced at CA$34.52, while BBD-A.TO trades at CA$238.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.10, whereas BBD-A.TO's P/E ratio is 18.45. In terms of profitability, MDA.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BBD-A.TO's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, MDA.TO is more volatile compared to BBD-A.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDA.TO.Check BBD-A.TO's competition here
MDA.TO vs BBD-B.TO Comparison April 2026
MDA.TO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDA.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, BBD-B.TO has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MDA.TO is priced at CA$34.52, while BBD-B.TO trades at CA$237.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.10, whereas BBD-B.TO's P/E ratio is 18.37. In terms of profitability, MDA.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BBD-B.TO's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, MDA.TO is more volatile compared to BBD-B.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDA.TO.Check BBD-B.TO's competition here
MDA.TO vs CAE.TO Comparison April 2026
MDA.TO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDA.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, CAE.TO has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MDA.TO is priced at CA$34.52, while CAE.TO trades at CA$35.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.10, whereas CAE.TO's P/E ratio is 30.39. In terms of profitability, MDA.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CAE.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MDA.TO is more volatile compared to CAE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDA.TO.Check CAE.TO's competition here
MDA.TO vs BBD-PB.TO Comparison April 2026
MDA.TO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDA.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, BBD-PB.TO has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MDA.TO is priced at CA$34.52, while BBD-PB.TO trades at CA$18.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.10, whereas BBD-PB.TO's P/E ratio is -4.08. In terms of profitability, MDA.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BBD-PB.TO's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, MDA.TO is more volatile compared to BBD-PB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDA.TO.Check BBD-PB.TO's competition here
MDA.TO vs BBD-PC.TO Comparison April 2026
MDA.TO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDA.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, BBD-PC.TO has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MDA.TO is priced at CA$34.52, while BBD-PC.TO trades at CA$25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.10, whereas BBD-PC.TO's P/E ratio is -5.64. In terms of profitability, MDA.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BBD-PC.TO's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, MDA.TO is more volatile compared to BBD-PC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDA.TO.Check BBD-PC.TO's competition here
MDA.TO vs MAL.TO Comparison April 2026
MDA.TO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDA.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, MAL.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MDA.TO is priced at CA$34.52, while MAL.TO trades at CA$20.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.10, whereas MAL.TO's P/E ratio is 25.92. In terms of profitability, MDA.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MAL.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MDA.TO is more volatile compared to MAL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDA.TO.Check MAL.TO's competition here
MDA.TO vs HRX.TO Comparison April 2026
MDA.TO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDA.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, HRX.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MDA.TO is priced at CA$34.52, while HRX.TO trades at CA$32.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.10, whereas HRX.TO's P/E ratio is 21.23. In terms of profitability, MDA.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HRX.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MDA.TO is more volatile compared to HRX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDA.TO.Check HRX.TO's competition here
MDA.TO vs FTG.TO Comparison April 2026
MDA.TO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDA.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, FTG.TO has a market cap of 437.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MDA.TO is priced at CA$34.52, while FTG.TO trades at CA$17.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.10, whereas FTG.TO's P/E ratio is 33.44. In terms of profitability, MDA.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FTG.TO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MDA.TO is more volatile compared to FTG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDA.TO.Check FTG.TO's competition here
MDA.TO vs RHM.NE Comparison April 2026
MDA.TO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDA.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, RHM.NE has a market cap of 371.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MDA.TO is priced at CA$34.52, while RHM.NE trades at CA$8.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.10, whereas RHM.NE's P/E ratio is 0.23. In terms of profitability, MDA.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RHM.NE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MDA.TO is more volatile compared to RHM.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDA.TO.Check RHM.NE's competition here
MDA.TO vs MAXQ.NE Comparison April 2026
MDA.TO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDA.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, MAXQ.NE has a market cap of 292.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MDA.TO is priced at CA$34.52, while MAXQ.NE trades at CA$0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.10, whereas MAXQ.NE's P/E ratio is -59.00. In terms of profitability, MDA.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MAXQ.NE's ROE of +3.57%. Regarding short-term risk, MDA.TO is less volatile compared to MAXQ.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDA.TO.Check MAXQ.NE's competition here
MDA.TO vs DPRO.CN Comparison April 2026
MDA.TO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDA.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, DPRO.CN has a market cap of 147M. Regarding current trading prices, MDA.TO is priced at CA$34.52, while DPRO.CN trades at CA$6.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.10, whereas DPRO.CN's P/E ratio is -4.33. In terms of profitability, MDA.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DPRO.CN's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MDA.TO is more volatile compared to DPRO.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDA.TO.Check DPRO.CN's competition here
MDA.TO vs SNA.CN Comparison April 2026
MDA.TO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDA.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, SNA.CN has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MDA.TO is priced at CA$34.52, while SNA.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.10, whereas SNA.CN's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, MDA.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SNA.CN's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, MDA.TO is less volatile compared to SNA.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDA.TO.Check SNA.CN's competition here
MDA.TO vs DFSC.V Comparison April 2026
MDA.TO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDA.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, DFSC.V has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MDA.TO is priced at CA$34.52, while DFSC.V trades at CA$3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.10, whereas DFSC.V's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, MDA.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DFSC.V's ROE of -2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MDA.TO is less volatile compared to DFSC.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDA.TO.Check DFSC.V's competition here
MDA.TO vs AVP.TO Comparison April 2026
MDA.TO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDA.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, AVP.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MDA.TO is priced at CA$34.52, while AVP.TO trades at CA$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.10, whereas AVP.TO's P/E ratio is -1.91. In terms of profitability, MDA.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AVP.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MDA.TO is more volatile compared to AVP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDA.TO.Check AVP.TO's competition here