McRae Industries, Inc.
McRae Industries, Inc. (MCRAA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MCRAA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Footwear & Accessories Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCRAA | $48.28 | +0.00% | 112.5M | 13.52 | $3.57 | +2.57% |
| ADDYY | $96.49 | +1.29% | 34.5B | 25.09 | $3.85 | +1.17% |
| ADDDF | $190.00 | -2.46% | 33.9B | 28.23 | $6.73 | +1.18% |
| ASCCF | $24.53 | +0.00% | 17.5B | 37.74 | $0.65 | +0.60% |
| ASCCY | $23.79 | +0.51% | 16.9B | 36.36 | $0.65 | +0.45% |
| BCUCF | $118.00 | +0.00% | 8B | 58.13 | $2.03 | +0.90% |
| PMMAF | $21.95 | +2.62% | 3.2B | 14.54 | $1.51 | +3.15% |
| HUGPF | $46.36 | +0.00% | 3.2B | 13.10 | $3.54 | +3.37% |
| PUMSY | $2.06 | +0.00% | 3.1B | 13.67 | $0.15 | +3.36% |
| SMSEY | $10.15 | +0.20% | 2.8B | 8.53 | $1.19 | +5.29% |
Stock Comparison
MCRAA vs ADDYY Comparison August 2025
MCRAA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCRAA stands at 112.5M. In comparison, ADDYY has a market cap of 34.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MCRAA is priced at $48.28, while ADDYY trades at $96.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.52, whereas ADDYY's P/E ratio is 25.09. In terms of profitability, MCRAA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ADDYY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MCRAA is more volatile compared to ADDYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCRAA.Check ADDYY's competition here
MCRAA vs ADDDF Comparison August 2025
MCRAA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCRAA stands at 112.5M. In comparison, ADDDF has a market cap of 33.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MCRAA is priced at $48.28, while ADDDF trades at $190.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.52, whereas ADDDF's P/E ratio is 28.23. In terms of profitability, MCRAA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ADDDF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MCRAA is less volatile compared to ADDDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCRAA.Check ADDDF's competition here
MCRAA vs ASCCF Comparison August 2025
MCRAA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCRAA stands at 112.5M. In comparison, ASCCF has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MCRAA is priced at $48.28, while ASCCF trades at $24.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.52, whereas ASCCF's P/E ratio is 37.74. In terms of profitability, MCRAA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ASCCF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MCRAA is less volatile compared to ASCCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCRAA.Check ASCCF's competition here
MCRAA vs ASCCY Comparison August 2025
MCRAA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCRAA stands at 112.5M. In comparison, ASCCY has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MCRAA is priced at $48.28, while ASCCY trades at $23.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.52, whereas ASCCY's P/E ratio is 36.36. In terms of profitability, MCRAA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ASCCY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MCRAA is more volatile compared to ASCCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCRAA.Check ASCCY's competition here
MCRAA vs BCUCF Comparison August 2025
MCRAA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCRAA stands at 112.5M. In comparison, BCUCF has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, MCRAA is priced at $48.28, while BCUCF trades at $118.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.52, whereas BCUCF's P/E ratio is 58.13. In terms of profitability, MCRAA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BCUCF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MCRAA is more volatile compared to BCUCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCRAA.Check BCUCF's competition here
MCRAA vs PMMAF Comparison August 2025
MCRAA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCRAA stands at 112.5M. In comparison, PMMAF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MCRAA is priced at $48.28, while PMMAF trades at $21.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.52, whereas PMMAF's P/E ratio is 14.54. In terms of profitability, MCRAA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PMMAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MCRAA is more volatile compared to PMMAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCRAA.Check PMMAF's competition here
MCRAA vs HUGPF Comparison August 2025
MCRAA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCRAA stands at 112.5M. In comparison, HUGPF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MCRAA is priced at $48.28, while HUGPF trades at $46.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.52, whereas HUGPF's P/E ratio is 13.10. In terms of profitability, MCRAA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HUGPF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MCRAA is more volatile compared to HUGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCRAA.Check HUGPF's competition here
MCRAA vs PUMSY Comparison August 2025
MCRAA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCRAA stands at 112.5M. In comparison, PUMSY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MCRAA is priced at $48.28, while PUMSY trades at $2.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.52, whereas PUMSY's P/E ratio is 13.67. In terms of profitability, MCRAA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PUMSY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MCRAA is less volatile compared to PUMSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCRAA.Check PUMSY's competition here
MCRAA vs SMSEY Comparison August 2025
MCRAA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCRAA stands at 112.5M. In comparison, SMSEY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MCRAA is priced at $48.28, while SMSEY trades at $10.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.52, whereas SMSEY's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, MCRAA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SMSEY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MCRAA is more volatile compared to SMSEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCRAA.Check SMSEY's competition here
MCRAA vs SMSOF Comparison August 2025
MCRAA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCRAA stands at 112.5M. In comparison, SMSOF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MCRAA is priced at $48.28, while SMSOF trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.52, whereas SMSOF's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, MCRAA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SMSOF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MCRAA is more volatile compared to SMSOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCRAA.Check SMSOF's competition here
MCRAA vs YUEIF Comparison August 2025
MCRAA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCRAA stands at 112.5M. In comparison, YUEIF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MCRAA is priced at $48.28, while YUEIF trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.52, whereas YUEIF's P/E ratio is 6.88. In terms of profitability, MCRAA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to YUEIF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MCRAA is more volatile compared to YUEIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCRAA.Check YUEIF's competition here
MCRAA vs YUEIY Comparison August 2025
MCRAA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCRAA stands at 112.5M. In comparison, YUEIY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MCRAA is priced at $48.28, while YUEIY trades at $7.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.52, whereas YUEIY's P/E ratio is 6.28. In terms of profitability, MCRAA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to YUEIY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MCRAA is more volatile compared to YUEIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCRAA.Check YUEIY's competition here
MCRAA vs TSIOF Comparison August 2025
MCRAA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCRAA stands at 112.5M. In comparison, TSIOF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MCRAA is priced at $48.28, while TSIOF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.52, whereas TSIOF's P/E ratio is 10.72. In terms of profitability, MCRAA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TSIOF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MCRAA is more volatile compared to TSIOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCRAA.Check TSIOF's competition here
MCRAA vs TODGF Comparison August 2025
MCRAA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCRAA stands at 112.5M. In comparison, TODGF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MCRAA is priced at $48.28, while TODGF trades at $37.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.52, whereas TODGF's P/E ratio is 21.39. In terms of profitability, MCRAA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TODGF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MCRAA is more volatile compared to TODGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCRAA.Check TODGF's competition here
MCRAA vs SLNLY Comparison August 2025
MCRAA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCRAA stands at 112.5M. In comparison, SLNLY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MCRAA is priced at $48.28, while SLNLY trades at $18.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.52, whereas SLNLY's P/E ratio is 8.81. In terms of profitability, MCRAA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SLNLY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MCRAA is less volatile compared to SLNLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCRAA.Check SLNLY's competition here
MCRAA vs FXWZF Comparison August 2025
MCRAA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCRAA stands at 112.5M. In comparison, FXWZF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MCRAA is priced at $48.28, while FXWZF trades at $30.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.52, whereas FXWZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MCRAA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FXWZF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MCRAA is more volatile compared to FXWZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCRAA.Check FXWZF's competition here
MCRAA vs DRMTY Comparison August 2025
MCRAA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCRAA stands at 112.5M. In comparison, DRMTY has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, MCRAA is priced at $48.28, while DRMTY trades at $2.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.52, whereas DRMTY's P/E ratio is 213.60. In terms of profitability, MCRAA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DRMTY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MCRAA is less volatile compared to DRMTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCRAA.Check DRMTY's competition here
MCRAA vs DOCMF Comparison August 2025
MCRAA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCRAA stands at 112.5M. In comparison, DOCMF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, MCRAA is priced at $48.28, while DOCMF trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.52, whereas DOCMF's P/E ratio is 104.00. In terms of profitability, MCRAA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DOCMF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MCRAA is more volatile compared to DOCMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCRAA.Check DOCMF's competition here
MCRAA vs GXSBY Comparison August 2025
MCRAA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCRAA stands at 112.5M. In comparison, GXSBY has a market cap of 260.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MCRAA is priced at $48.28, while GXSBY trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.52, whereas GXSBY's P/E ratio is -11.86. In terms of profitability, MCRAA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GXSBY's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MCRAA is more volatile compared to GXSBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCRAA.Check GXSBY's competition here
MCRAA vs GXSBF Comparison August 2025
MCRAA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCRAA stands at 112.5M. In comparison, GXSBF has a market cap of 219.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MCRAA is priced at $48.28, while GXSBF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.52, whereas GXSBF's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, MCRAA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GXSBF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MCRAA is less volatile compared to GXSBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCRAA.Check GXSBF's competition here
MCRAA vs TDPAY Comparison August 2025
MCRAA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCRAA stands at 112.5M. In comparison, TDPAY has a market cap of 151M. Regarding current trading prices, MCRAA is priced at $48.28, while TDPAY trades at $4.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.52, whereas TDPAY's P/E ratio is 28.50. In terms of profitability, MCRAA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TDPAY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MCRAA is more volatile compared to TDPAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCRAA.Check TDPAY's competition here
MCRAA vs MCRAB Comparison August 2025
MCRAA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCRAA stands at 112.5M. In comparison, MCRAB has a market cap of 112.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MCRAA is priced at $48.28, while MCRAB trades at $49.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.52, whereas MCRAB's P/E ratio is 13.73. In terms of profitability, MCRAA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MCRAB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MCRAA and MCRAB have similar daily volatility (3.05).Check MCRAB's competition here
MCRAA vs DPNEY Comparison August 2025
MCRAA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCRAA stands at 112.5M. In comparison, DPNEY has a market cap of 92M. Regarding current trading prices, MCRAA is priced at $48.28, while DPNEY trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.52, whereas DPNEY's P/E ratio is 6.20. In terms of profitability, MCRAA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DPNEY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MCRAA is more volatile compared to DPNEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCRAA.Check DPNEY's competition here
MCRAA vs DPNEF Comparison August 2025
MCRAA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCRAA stands at 112.5M. In comparison, DPNEF has a market cap of 39.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MCRAA is priced at $48.28, while DPNEF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.52, whereas DPNEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MCRAA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DPNEF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MCRAA is less volatile compared to DPNEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCRAA.Check DPNEF's competition here
MCRAA vs KMSWF Comparison August 2025
MCRAA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCRAA stands at 112.5M. In comparison, KMSWF has a market cap of 33.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MCRAA is priced at $48.28, while KMSWF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.52, whereas KMSWF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, MCRAA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KMSWF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MCRAA is less volatile compared to KMSWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCRAA.Check KMSWF's competition here
MCRAA vs BSHI Comparison August 2025
MCRAA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCRAA stands at 112.5M. In comparison, BSHI has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MCRAA is priced at $48.28, while BSHI trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.52, whereas BSHI's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, MCRAA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BSHI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MCRAA is more volatile compared to BSHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCRAA.Check BSHI's competition here
MCRAA vs TIEMF Comparison August 2025
MCRAA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCRAA stands at 112.5M. In comparison, TIEMF has a market cap of 11.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MCRAA is priced at $48.28, while TIEMF trades at $4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.52, whereas TIEMF's P/E ratio is 35.04. In terms of profitability, MCRAA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TIEMF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MCRAA is more volatile compared to TIEMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCRAA.Check TIEMF's competition here
MCRAA vs GVSI Comparison August 2025
MCRAA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCRAA stands at 112.5M. In comparison, GVSI has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MCRAA is priced at $48.28, while GVSI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.52, whereas GVSI's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, MCRAA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GVSI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MCRAA is less volatile compared to GVSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCRAA.Check GVSI's competition here
MCRAA vs CHSH Comparison August 2025
MCRAA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCRAA stands at 112.5M. In comparison, CHSH has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MCRAA is priced at $48.28, while CHSH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.52, whereas CHSH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MCRAA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CHSH's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MCRAA is more volatile compared to CHSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCRAA.Check CHSH's competition here
MCRAA vs RBNW Comparison August 2025
MCRAA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCRAA stands at 112.5M. In comparison, RBNW has a market cap of 939.2K. Regarding current trading prices, MCRAA is priced at $48.28, while RBNW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.52, whereas RBNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MCRAA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RBNW's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MCRAA is less volatile compared to RBNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCRAA.Check RBNW's competition here
MCRAA vs SAML Comparison August 2025
MCRAA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCRAA stands at 112.5M. In comparison, SAML has a market cap of 342K. Regarding current trading prices, MCRAA is priced at $48.28, while SAML trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.52, whereas SAML's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, MCRAA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SAML's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MCRAA is more volatile compared to SAML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCRAA.Check SAML's competition here
MCRAA vs ATYM Comparison August 2025
MCRAA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCRAA stands at 112.5M. In comparison, ATYM has a market cap of 265.7K. Regarding current trading prices, MCRAA is priced at $48.28, while ATYM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.52, whereas ATYM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MCRAA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ATYM's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MCRAA is less volatile compared to ATYM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCRAA.Check ATYM's competition here
MCRAA vs PXFG Comparison August 2025
MCRAA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCRAA stands at 112.5M. In comparison, PXFG has a market cap of 81.8K. Regarding current trading prices, MCRAA is priced at $48.28, while PXFG trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.52, whereas PXFG's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, MCRAA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PXFG's ROE of -5.99%. Regarding short-term risk, MCRAA is less volatile compared to PXFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCRAA.Check PXFG's competition here
MCRAA vs QING Comparison August 2025
MCRAA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCRAA stands at 112.5M. In comparison, QING has a market cap of 1.2K. Regarding current trading prices, MCRAA is priced at $48.28, while QING trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.52, whereas QING's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, MCRAA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to QING's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MCRAA is more volatile compared to QING. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCRAA.Check QING's competition here
MCRAA vs LESAF Comparison August 2025
MCRAA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCRAA stands at 112.5M. In comparison, LESAF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MCRAA is priced at $48.28, while LESAF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.52, whereas LESAF's P/E ratio is 2.37. In terms of profitability, MCRAA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LESAF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MCRAA is more volatile compared to LESAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCRAA.Check LESAF's competition here