McKesson Corporation
McKesson Corporation MCK Peers
See (MCK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Stock Comparison
MCK vs COR Comparison
MCK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCK stands at 88.60B. In comparison, COR has a market cap of 56.61B. Regarding current trading prices, MCK is priced at $706.99, while COR trades at $291.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.39, whereas COR's P/E ratio is 41.47. In terms of profitability, MCK's ROE is -1.15%, compared to COR's ROE of +1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, MCK is more volatile compared to COR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCK.
MCK vs CAH Comparison
MCK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCK stands at 88.60B. In comparison, CAH has a market cap of 36.72B. Regarding current trading prices, MCK is priced at $706.99, while CAH trades at $152.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.39, whereas CAH's P/E ratio is 23.82. In terms of profitability, MCK's ROE is -1.15%, compared to CAH's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, MCK is less volatile compared to CAH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCK.
MCK vs ABC Comparison
MCK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCK stands at 88.60B. In comparison, ABC has a market cap of 36.15B. Regarding current trading prices, MCK is priced at $706.99, while ABC trades at $179.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.39, whereas ABC's P/E ratio is 21.92. In terms of profitability, MCK's ROE is -1.15%, compared to ABC's ROE of +1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, MCK is more volatile compared to ABC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCK.
MCK vs SHPMY Comparison
MCK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCK stands at 88.60B. In comparison, SHPMY has a market cap of 8.49B. Regarding current trading prices, MCK is priced at $706.99, while SHPMY trades at $7.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.39, whereas SHPMY's P/E ratio is 9.69. In terms of profitability, MCK's ROE is -1.15%, compared to SHPMY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MCK is less volatile compared to SHPMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCK.
MCK vs HSIC Comparison
MCK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCK stands at 88.60B. In comparison, HSIC has a market cap of 8.16B. Regarding current trading prices, MCK is priced at $706.99, while HSIC trades at $66.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.39, whereas HSIC's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, MCK's ROE is -1.15%, compared to HSIC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MCK is less volatile compared to HSIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCK.
MCK vs SHPMF Comparison
MCK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCK stands at 88.60B. In comparison, SHPMF has a market cap of 8.13B. Regarding current trading prices, MCK is priced at $706.99, while SHPMF trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.39, whereas SHPMF's P/E ratio is 10.47. In terms of profitability, MCK's ROE is -1.15%, compared to SHPMF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MCK is more volatile compared to SHPMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCK.
MCK vs SHTDY Comparison
MCK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCK stands at 88.60B. In comparison, SHTDY has a market cap of 8.04B. Regarding current trading prices, MCK is priced at $706.99, while SHTDY trades at $12.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.39, whereas SHTDY's P/E ratio is 6.72. In terms of profitability, MCK's ROE is -1.15%, compared to SHTDY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MCK is less volatile compared to SHTDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCK.
MCK vs SHTDF Comparison
MCK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCK stands at 88.60B. In comparison, SHTDF has a market cap of 7.64B. Regarding current trading prices, MCK is priced at $706.99, while SHTDF trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.39, whereas SHTDF's P/E ratio is 6.45. In terms of profitability, MCK's ROE is -1.15%, compared to SHTDF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MCK is less volatile compared to SHTDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCK.
MCK vs CAKFY Comparison
MCK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCK stands at 88.60B. In comparison, CAKFY has a market cap of 5.37B. Regarding current trading prices, MCK is priced at $706.99, while CAKFY trades at $4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.39, whereas CAKFY's P/E ratio is -68.33. In terms of profitability, MCK's ROE is -1.15%, compared to CAKFY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MCK is more volatile compared to CAKFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCK.
MCK vs AMFPF Comparison
MCK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCK stands at 88.60B. In comparison, AMFPF has a market cap of 4.28B. Regarding current trading prices, MCK is priced at $706.99, while AMFPF trades at $19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.39, whereas AMFPF's P/E ratio is 26.03. In terms of profitability, MCK's ROE is -1.15%, compared to AMFPF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MCK is more volatile compared to AMFPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCK.
MCK vs PBH Comparison
MCK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCK stands at 88.60B. In comparison, PBH has a market cap of 4.11B. Regarding current trading prices, MCK is priced at $706.99, while PBH trades at $82.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.39, whereas PBH's P/E ratio is 19.47. In terms of profitability, MCK's ROE is -1.15%, compared to PBH's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MCK is less volatile compared to PBH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCK.
MCK vs GALNF Comparison
MCK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCK stands at 88.60B. In comparison, GALNF has a market cap of 3.75B. Regarding current trading prices, MCK is priced at $706.99, while GALNF trades at $75.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.39, whereas GALNF's P/E ratio is 20.23. In terms of profitability, MCK's ROE is -1.15%, compared to GALNF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MCK is more volatile compared to GALNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCK.
MCK vs MAHLY Comparison
MCK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCK stands at 88.60B. In comparison, MAHLY has a market cap of 3.40B. Regarding current trading prices, MCK is priced at $706.99, while MAHLY trades at $16.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.39, whereas MAHLY's P/E ratio is 9.91. In terms of profitability, MCK's ROE is -1.15%, compared to MAHLY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MCK is more volatile compared to MAHLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCK.
MCK vs MEPDF Comparison
MCK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCK stands at 88.60B. In comparison, MEPDF has a market cap of 3.08B. Regarding current trading prices, MCK is priced at $706.99, while MEPDF trades at $14.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.39, whereas MEPDF's P/E ratio is 8.97. In terms of profitability, MCK's ROE is -1.15%, compared to MEPDF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MCK is less volatile compared to MEPDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCK.
MCK vs PDCO Comparison
MCK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCK stands at 88.60B. In comparison, PDCO has a market cap of 2.77B. Regarding current trading prices, MCK is priced at $706.99, while PDCO trades at $31.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.39, whereas PDCO's P/E ratio is 20.48. In terms of profitability, MCK's ROE is -1.15%, compared to PDCO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MCK is more volatile compared to PDCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCK.
MCK vs ALFRY Comparison
MCK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCK stands at 88.60B. In comparison, ALFRY has a market cap of 2.44B. Regarding current trading prices, MCK is priced at $706.99, while ALFRY trades at $13.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.39, whereas ALFRY's P/E ratio is 12.90. In terms of profitability, MCK's ROE is -1.15%, compared to ALFRY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MCK is more volatile compared to ALFRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCK.
MCK vs ARHCF Comparison
MCK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCK stands at 88.60B. In comparison, ARHCF has a market cap of 2.27B. Regarding current trading prices, MCK is priced at $706.99, while ARHCF trades at $11.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.39, whereas ARHCF's P/E ratio is 9.97. In terms of profitability, MCK's ROE is -1.15%, compared to ARHCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MCK is more volatile compared to ARHCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCK.
MCK vs SZUKF Comparison
MCK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCK stands at 88.60B. In comparison, SZUKF has a market cap of 1.72B. Regarding current trading prices, MCK is priced at $706.99, while SZUKF trades at $30.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.39, whereas SZUKF's P/E ratio is 11.43. In terms of profitability, MCK's ROE is -1.15%, compared to SZUKF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MCK is more volatile compared to SZUKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCK.
MCK vs IUSDF Comparison
MCK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCK stands at 88.60B. In comparison, IUSDF has a market cap of 1.66B. Regarding current trading prices, MCK is priced at $706.99, while IUSDF trades at $23.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.39, whereas IUSDF's P/E ratio is 30.05. In terms of profitability, MCK's ROE is -1.15%, compared to IUSDF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MCK is less volatile compared to IUSDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCK.
MCK vs GRDN Comparison
MCK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCK stands at 88.60B. In comparison, GRDN has a market cap of 1.60B. Regarding current trading prices, MCK is priced at $706.99, while GRDN trades at $25.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.39, whereas GRDN's P/E ratio is -14.16. In terms of profitability, MCK's ROE is -1.15%, compared to GRDN's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MCK is less volatile compared to GRDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCK.
MCK vs MEDOF Comparison
MCK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCK stands at 88.60B. In comparison, MEDOF has a market cap of 1.28B. Regarding current trading prices, MCK is priced at $706.99, while MEDOF trades at $50.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.39, whereas MEDOF's P/E ratio is 73.53. In terms of profitability, MCK's ROE is -1.15%, compared to MEDOF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MCK is less volatile compared to MEDOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCK.
MCK vs ARRJF Comparison
MCK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCK stands at 88.60B. In comparison, ARRJF has a market cap of 836.17M. Regarding current trading prices, MCK is priced at $706.99, while ARRJF trades at $3.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.39, whereas ARRJF's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, MCK's ROE is -1.15%, compared to ARRJF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MCK is less volatile compared to ARRJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCK.
MCK vs OMI Comparison
MCK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCK stands at 88.60B. In comparison, OMI has a market cap of 628.85M. Regarding current trading prices, MCK is priced at $706.99, while OMI trades at $8.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.39, whereas OMI's P/E ratio is -1.72. In terms of profitability, MCK's ROE is -1.15%, compared to OMI's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, MCK is less volatile compared to OMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCK.
MCK vs WGRX Comparison
MCK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCK stands at 88.60B. In comparison, WGRX has a market cap of 237.39M. Regarding current trading prices, MCK is priced at $706.99, while WGRX trades at $4.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.39, whereas WGRX's P/E ratio is -30.47. In terms of profitability, MCK's ROE is -1.15%, compared to WGRX's ROE of -1.74%. Regarding short-term risk, MCK is less volatile compared to WGRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCK.
MCK vs ZYXI Comparison
MCK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCK stands at 88.60B. In comparison, ZYXI has a market cap of 63.65M. Regarding current trading prices, MCK is priced at $706.99, while ZYXI trades at $2.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.39, whereas ZYXI's P/E ratio is 23.39. In terms of profitability, MCK's ROE is -1.15%, compared to ZYXI's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MCK is less volatile compared to ZYXI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCK.
MCK vs GEG Comparison
MCK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCK stands at 88.60B. In comparison, GEG has a market cap of 53.85M. Regarding current trading prices, MCK is priced at $706.99, while GEG trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.39, whereas GEG's P/E ratio is -190.00. In terms of profitability, MCK's ROE is -1.15%, compared to GEG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MCK is more volatile compared to GEG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCK.
MCK vs HX Comparison
MCK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCK stands at 88.60B. In comparison, HX has a market cap of 53.37M. Regarding current trading prices, MCK is priced at $706.99, while HX trades at $2.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.39, whereas HX's P/E ratio is -1.84. In terms of profitability, MCK's ROE is -1.15%, compared to HX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MCK is less volatile compared to HX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCK.
MCK vs EXHI Comparison
MCK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCK stands at 88.60B. In comparison, EXHI has a market cap of 15.06M. Regarding current trading prices, MCK is priced at $706.99, while EXHI trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.39, whereas EXHI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MCK's ROE is -1.15%, compared to EXHI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MCK is more volatile compared to EXHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCK.
MCK vs NSVGF Comparison
MCK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCK stands at 88.60B. In comparison, NSVGF has a market cap of 8.48M. Regarding current trading prices, MCK is priced at $706.99, while NSVGF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.39, whereas NSVGF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, MCK's ROE is -1.15%, compared to NSVGF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MCK is less volatile compared to NSVGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCK.
MCK vs ENMI Comparison
MCK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCK stands at 88.60B. In comparison, ENMI has a market cap of 7.66M. Regarding current trading prices, MCK is priced at $706.99, while ENMI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.39, whereas ENMI's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, MCK's ROE is -1.15%, compared to ENMI's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, MCK is less volatile compared to ENMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCK.
MCK vs RDGT Comparison
MCK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCK stands at 88.60B. In comparison, RDGT has a market cap of 6.44M. Regarding current trading prices, MCK is priced at $706.99, while RDGT trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.39, whereas RDGT's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, MCK's ROE is -1.15%, compared to RDGT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MCK is less volatile compared to RDGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCK.
MCK vs PDRX Comparison
MCK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCK stands at 88.60B. In comparison, PDRX has a market cap of 4.26M. Regarding current trading prices, MCK is priced at $706.99, while PDRX trades at $2.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.39, whereas PDRX's P/E ratio is 2.56. In terms of profitability, MCK's ROE is -1.15%, compared to PDRX's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MCK is more volatile compared to PDRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCK.
MCK vs KOSK Comparison
MCK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCK stands at 88.60B. In comparison, KOSK has a market cap of 3.98M. Regarding current trading prices, MCK is priced at $706.99, while KOSK trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.39, whereas KOSK's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, MCK's ROE is -1.15%, compared to KOSK's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MCK is more volatile compared to KOSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCK.
MCK vs ITNS Comparison
MCK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCK stands at 88.60B. In comparison, ITNS has a market cap of 533194.00. Regarding current trading prices, MCK is priced at $706.99, while ITNS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.39, whereas ITNS's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, MCK's ROE is -1.15%, compared to ITNS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MCK is less volatile compared to ITNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCK.
MCK vs PHRX Comparison
MCK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCK stands at 88.60B. In comparison, PHRX has a market cap of 5171.00. Regarding current trading prices, MCK is priced at $706.99, while PHRX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.39, whereas PHRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MCK's ROE is -1.15%, compared to PHRX's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, MCK is less volatile compared to PHRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCK.
MCK vs CHME Comparison
MCK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCK stands at 88.60B. In comparison, CHME has a market cap of 2380.00. Regarding current trading prices, MCK is priced at $706.99, while CHME trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.39, whereas CHME's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MCK's ROE is -1.15%, compared to CHME's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MCK is more volatile compared to CHME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCK.
MCK vs MLTO Comparison
MCK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCK stands at 88.60B. In comparison, MLTO has a market cap of 1700.00. Regarding current trading prices, MCK is priced at $706.99, while MLTO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.39, whereas MLTO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MCK's ROE is -1.15%, compared to MLTO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MCK is less volatile compared to MLTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCK.
MCK vs TGVN Comparison
MCK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCK stands at 88.60B. In comparison, TGVN has a market cap of 120.00. Regarding current trading prices, MCK is priced at $706.99, while TGVN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.39, whereas TGVN's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MCK's ROE is -1.15%, compared to TGVN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MCK is more volatile compared to TGVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCK.
MCK vs CVET Comparison
MCK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCK stands at 88.60B. In comparison, CVET comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MCK is priced at $706.99, while CVET trades at $20.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.39, whereas CVET's P/E ratio is -69.97. In terms of profitability, MCK's ROE is -1.15%, compared to CVET's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MCK is more volatile compared to CVET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCK.
Peer Comparison Table: Medical - Distribution Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCK | $706.99 | -0.20% | 88.60B | 32.39 | $21.83 | +0.39% |
COR | $291.95 | -0.06% | 56.61B | 41.47 | $7.04 | +0.73% |
CAH | $152.00 | +1.65% | 36.72B | 23.82 | $6.38 | +1.33% |
ABC | $179.98 | -0.23% | 36.15B | 21.92 | $8.21 | N/A |
SHPMY | $7.17 | N/A | 8.49B | 9.69 | $0.74 | +4.95% |
HSIC | $66.58 | +1.96% | 8.16B | 21.83 | $3.05 | N/A |
SHPMF | $1.57 | N/A | 8.13B | 10.47 | $0.15 | +4.33% |
SHTDY | $12.76 | +2.49% | 8.04B | 6.72 | $1.90 | +5.15% |
SHTDF | $2.45 | N/A | 7.64B | 6.45 | $0.38 | +5.21% |
CAKFY | $4.10 | N/A | 5.37B | -68.33 | -$0.06 | N/A |