Mabuchi Motor Co., Ltd.
Mabuchi Motor Co., Ltd. (MBUMY) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MBUMY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MBUMY | $7.28 | +0.00% | 3.7B | 29.10 | $0.25 | N/A |
| FYGGY | $1.78 | -1.11% | 78.6B | 16.18 | $0.11 | +3.46% |
| DNZOF | $14.44 | +8.98% | 40.9B | 15.14 | $0.98 | +2.93% |
| DNZOY | $13.73 | +0.73% | 38.3B | 14.04 | $0.98 | +1.73% |
| BRDCY | $20.79 | +2.77% | 28B | 15.33 | $1.35 | +2.14% |
| BRDCF | $41.00 | +0.00% | 27.8B | 15.24 | $2.69 | +3.47% |
| MGDDY | $17.90 | +0.35% | 25.3B | 8.02 | $2.23 | +4.24% |
| MGDDF | $35.70 | +0.17% | 25.2B | 3.20 | $11.17 | +4.36% |
| SMTOY | $24.67 | -1.65% | 19.2B | 14.77 | $1.67 | +1.52% |
| CTTAF | $85.81 | +1.32% | 17.2B | 12.51 | $6.86 | +2.91% |
Stock Comparison
MBUMY vs FYGGY Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, FYGGY has a market cap of 78.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while FYGGY trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas FYGGY's P/E ratio is 16.18. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FYGGY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is more volatile compared to FYGGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check FYGGY's competition here
MBUMY vs DNZOF Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, DNZOF has a market cap of 40.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while DNZOF trades at $14.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas DNZOF's P/E ratio is 15.14. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DNZOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is less volatile compared to DNZOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check DNZOF's competition here
MBUMY vs DNZOY Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, DNZOY has a market cap of 38.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while DNZOY trades at $13.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas DNZOY's P/E ratio is 14.04. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DNZOY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is more volatile compared to DNZOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check DNZOY's competition here
MBUMY vs BRDCY Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, BRDCY has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while BRDCY trades at $20.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas BRDCY's P/E ratio is 15.33. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BRDCY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is more volatile compared to BRDCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check BRDCY's competition here
MBUMY vs BRDCF Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, BRDCF has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while BRDCF trades at $41.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas BRDCF's P/E ratio is 15.24. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BRDCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is more volatile compared to BRDCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check BRDCF's competition here
MBUMY vs MGDDY Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, MGDDY has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while MGDDY trades at $17.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas MGDDY's P/E ratio is 8.02. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MGDDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is more volatile compared to MGDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check MGDDY's competition here
MBUMY vs MGDDF Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, MGDDF has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while MGDDF trades at $35.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas MGDDF's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MGDDF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is more volatile compared to MGDDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check MGDDF's competition here
MBUMY vs SMTOY Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, SMTOY has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while SMTOY trades at $24.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas SMTOY's P/E ratio is 14.77. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SMTOY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is more volatile compared to SMTOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check SMTOY's competition here
MBUMY vs CTTAF Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, CTTAF has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while CTTAF trades at $85.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas CTTAF's P/E ratio is 12.51. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CTTAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is more volatile compared to CTTAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check CTTAF's competition here
MBUMY vs CTTAY Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, CTTAY has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while CTTAY trades at $8.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas CTTAY's P/E ratio is 12.56. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CTTAY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is more volatile compared to CTTAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check CTTAY's competition here
MBUMY vs KNBHF Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, KNBHF has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while KNBHF trades at $100.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas KNBHF's P/E ratio is 33.22. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KNBHF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is more volatile compared to KNBHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check KNBHF's competition here
MBUMY vs KNRRY Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, KNRRY has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while KNRRY trades at $24.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas KNRRY's P/E ratio is 32.64. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KNRRY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is more volatile compared to KNRRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check KNRRY's competition here
MBUMY vs PTAIF Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, PTAIF has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while PTAIF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas PTAIF's P/E ratio is 6.40. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PTAIF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is more volatile compared to PTAIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check PTAIF's competition here
MBUMY vs PTAIY Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, PTAIY has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while PTAIY trades at $6.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas PTAIY's P/E ratio is 6.09. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PTAIY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is more volatile compared to PTAIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check PTAIY's competition here
MBUMY vs HLLGY Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, HLLGY has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while HLLGY trades at $49.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas HLLGY's P/E ratio is 48.97. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HLLGY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is more volatile compared to HLLGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check HLLGY's competition here
MBUMY vs HLKHF Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, HLKHF has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while HLKHF trades at $92.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas HLKHF's P/E ratio is 25.78. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HLKHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is more volatile compared to HLKHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check HLKHF's competition here
MBUMY vs ASEKY Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, ASEKY has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while ASEKY trades at $13.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas ASEKY's P/E ratio is 14.45. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ASEKY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is more volatile compared to ASEKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check ASEKY's competition here
MBUMY vs ASEKF Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, ASEKF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while ASEKF trades at $10.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas ASEKF's P/E ratio is 10.50. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ASEKF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is more volatile compared to ASEKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check ASEKF's competition here
MBUMY vs PLLIF Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, PLLIF has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while PLLIF trades at $6.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas PLLIF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PLLIF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is less volatile compared to PLLIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check PLLIF's competition here
MBUMY vs NGKSY Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, NGKSY has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while NGKSY trades at $16.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas NGKSY's P/E ratio is 10.53. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NGKSY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is less volatile compared to NGKSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check NGKSY's competition here
MBUMY vs NGKSF Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, NGKSF has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while NGKSF trades at $30.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas NGKSF's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NGKSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is more volatile compared to NGKSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check NGKSF's competition here
MBUMY vs SFFLY Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, SFFLY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while SFFLY trades at $5.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas SFFLY's P/E ratio is -4.35. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SFFLY's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is more volatile compared to SFFLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check SFFLY's competition here
MBUMY vs YORUY Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, YORUY has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while YORUY trades at $26.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas YORUY's P/E ratio is 9.83. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to YORUY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is more volatile compared to YORUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check YORUY's competition here
MBUMY vs YORUF Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, YORUF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while YORUF trades at $25.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas YORUF's P/E ratio is 8.68. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to YORUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is more volatile compared to YORUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check YORUF's competition here
MBUMY vs BRBOY Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, BRBOY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while BRBOY trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas BRBOY's P/E ratio is 16.51. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BRBOY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is less volatile compared to BRBOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check BRBOY's competition here
MBUMY vs MNTHY Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, MNTHY has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while MNTHY trades at $66.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas MNTHY's P/E ratio is 11.75. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MNTHY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is more volatile compared to MNTHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check MNTHY's competition here
MBUMY vs KOTMY Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, KOTMY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while KOTMY trades at $12.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas KOTMY's P/E ratio is 11.97. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KOTMY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is more volatile compared to KOTMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check KOTMY's competition here
MBUMY vs SCFLF Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, SCFLF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while SCFLF trades at $4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas SCFLF's P/E ratio is 9.60. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SCFLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is more volatile compared to SCFLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check SCFLF's competition here
MBUMY vs KOTMF Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, KOTMF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while KOTMF trades at $11.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas KOTMF's P/E ratio is 11.38. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KOTMF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is less volatile compared to KOTMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check KOTMF's competition here
MBUMY vs STAEY Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, STAEY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while STAEY trades at $11.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas STAEY's P/E ratio is 16.23. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to STAEY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is less volatile compared to STAEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check STAEY's competition here
MBUMY vs BRBOF Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, BRBOF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while BRBOF trades at $10.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas BRBOF's P/E ratio is 13.73. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BRBOF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is less volatile compared to BRBOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check BRBOF's competition here
MBUMY vs SMTUF Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, SMTUF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while SMTUF trades at $12.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas SMTUF's P/E ratio is -41.87. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SMTUF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is less volatile compared to SMTUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check SMTUF's competition here
MBUMY vs STAEF Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, STAEF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while STAEF trades at $20.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas STAEF's P/E ratio is 14.53. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to STAEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is more volatile compared to STAEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check STAEF's competition here
MBUMY vs LIMAF Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, LIMAF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while LIMAF trades at $48.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas LIMAF's P/E ratio is 15.61. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LIMAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is more volatile compared to LIMAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check LIMAF's competition here
MBUMY vs JEHLY Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, JEHLY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while JEHLY trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas JEHLY's P/E ratio is 10.64. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JEHLY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is more volatile compared to JEHLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check JEHLY's competition here
MBUMY vs VLEEY Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, VLEEY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while VLEEY trades at $5.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas VLEEY's P/E ratio is 18.86. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VLEEY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is more volatile compared to VLEEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check VLEEY's competition here
MBUMY vs VLEEF Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, VLEEF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while VLEEF trades at $10.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas VLEEF's P/E ratio is 18.22. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VLEEF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is more volatile compared to VLEEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check VLEEF's competition here
MBUMY vs FURCF Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, FURCF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while FURCF trades at $12.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas FURCF's P/E ratio is -4.71. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FURCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is more volatile compared to FURCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check FURCF's competition here
MBUMY vs JELCF Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, JELCF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while JELCF trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas JELCF's P/E ratio is 9.64. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JELCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is less volatile compared to JELCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check JELCF's competition here
MBUMY vs NHKGF Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, NHKGF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while NHKGF trades at $11.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas NHKGF's P/E ratio is 7.60. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NHKGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is more volatile compared to NHKGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check NHKGF's competition here
MBUMY vs TGOSY Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, TGOSY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while TGOSY trades at $37.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas TGOSY's P/E ratio is 9.69. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TGOSY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is less volatile compared to TGOSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check TGOSY's competition here
MBUMY vs TDBOF Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, TDBOF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while TDBOF trades at $13.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas TDBOF's P/E ratio is 20.34. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TDBOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is more volatile compared to TDBOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check TDBOF's competition here
MBUMY vs NIFCY Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, NIFCY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while NIFCY trades at $12.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas NIFCY's P/E ratio is 7.76. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NIFCY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is more volatile compared to NIFCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check NIFCY's competition here
MBUMY vs NPSKY Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, NPSKY has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while NPSKY trades at $9.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas NPSKY's P/E ratio is 28.18. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NPSKY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is more volatile compared to NPSKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check NPSKY's competition here
MBUMY vs VTSCF Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, VTSCF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while VTSCF trades at $56.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas VTSCF's P/E ratio is 82.35. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VTSCF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is more volatile compared to VTSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check VTSCF's competition here
MBUMY vs MNTHF Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, MNTHF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while MNTHF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas MNTHF's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MNTHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is more volatile compared to MNTHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check MNTHF's competition here
MBUMY vs NPSKF Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, NPSKF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while NPSKF trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas NPSKF's P/E ratio is 32.14. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NPSKF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is more volatile compared to NPSKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check NPSKF's competition here
MBUMY vs ARBFF Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, ARBFF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while ARBFF trades at $24.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas ARBFF's P/E ratio is 31.15. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ARBFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is more volatile compared to ARBFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check ARBFF's competition here
MBUMY vs NTXVF Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, NTXVF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while NTXVF trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas NTXVF's P/E ratio is 23.72. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NTXVF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is more volatile compared to NTXVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check NTXVF's competition here
MBUMY vs MBUMF Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, MBUMF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while MBUMF trades at $13.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas MBUMF's P/E ratio is 18.65. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MBUMF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is more volatile compared to MBUMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check MBUMF's competition here
MBUMY vs GMPUF Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, GMPUF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while GMPUF trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas GMPUF's P/E ratio is 9.22. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GMPUF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is more volatile compared to GMPUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check GMPUF's competition here
MBUMY vs UNIEF Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, UNIEF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while UNIEF trades at $35.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas UNIEF's P/E ratio is 24.13. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UNIEF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is more volatile compared to UNIEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check UNIEF's competition here
MBUMY vs FAURY Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, FAURY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while FAURY trades at $1.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas FAURY's P/E ratio is -6.89. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FAURY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is less volatile compared to FAURY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check FAURY's competition here
MBUMY vs PASTF Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, PASTF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while PASTF trades at $9.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas PASTF's P/E ratio is 8.05. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PASTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is less volatile compared to PASTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check PASTF's competition here
MBUMY vs NKRKY Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, NKRKY has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while NKRKY trades at $4.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas NKRKY's P/E ratio is -29.40. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NKRKY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is more volatile compared to NKRKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check NKRKY's competition here
MBUMY vs NKRKF Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, NKRKF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while NKRKF trades at $6.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas NKRKF's P/E ratio is -27.16. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NKRKF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is more volatile compared to NKRKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check NKRKF's competition here
MBUMY vs TIANF Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, TIANF has a market cap of 939.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while TIANF trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas TIANF's P/E ratio is 3.79. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TIANF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is more volatile compared to TIANF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check TIANF's competition here
MBUMY vs SFHLF Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, SFHLF has a market cap of 817.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while SFHLF trades at $18.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas SFHLF's P/E ratio is 11.05. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SFHLF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is more volatile compared to SFHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check SFHLF's competition here
MBUMY vs GUDDY Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, GUDDY has a market cap of 776.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while GUDDY trades at $11.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas GUDDY's P/E ratio is 25.42. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GUDDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is more volatile compared to GUDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check GUDDY's competition here
MBUMY vs ATNNF Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, ATNNF has a market cap of 775.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while ATNNF trades at $133.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas ATNNF's P/E ratio is 12.84. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ATNNF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is less volatile compared to ATNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check ATNNF's competition here
MBUMY vs ABDDF Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, ABDDF has a market cap of 757.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while ABDDF trades at $33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas ABDDF's P/E ratio is 143.48. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ABDDF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is more volatile compared to ABDDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check ABDDF's competition here
MBUMY vs GUDHF Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, GUDHF has a market cap of 692.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while GUDHF trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas GUDHF's P/E ratio is 13.42. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GUDHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is less volatile compared to GUDHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check GUDHF's competition here
MBUMY vs FCVFF Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, FCVFF has a market cap of 509.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while FCVFF trades at $10.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas FCVFF's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FCVFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is more volatile compared to FCVFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check FCVFF's competition here
MBUMY vs NMAKF Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, NMAKF has a market cap of 494.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while NMAKF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas NMAKF's P/E ratio is -5.64. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NMAKF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is more volatile compared to NMAKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check NMAKF's competition here
MBUMY vs MRETF Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, MRETF has a market cap of 438.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while MRETF trades at $6.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas MRETF's P/E ratio is -10.58. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MRETF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is more volatile compared to MRETF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check MRETF's competition here
MBUMY vs TCISF Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, TCISF has a market cap of 420M. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while TCISF trades at $12.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas TCISF's P/E ratio is 9.35. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TCISF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is more volatile compared to TCISF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check TCISF's competition here
MBUMY vs SAEOF Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, SAEOF has a market cap of 401.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while SAEOF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas SAEOF's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SAEOF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is more volatile compared to SAEOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check SAEOF's competition here
MBUMY vs VTSCY Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, VTSCY has a market cap of 400.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while VTSCY trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas VTSCY's P/E ratio is 76.92. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VTSCY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is more volatile compared to VTSCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check VTSCY's competition here
MBUMY vs PWRHF Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, PWRHF has a market cap of 371.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while PWRHF trades at $3.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas PWRHF's P/E ratio is 23.06. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PWRHF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is less volatile compared to PWRHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check PWRHF's competition here
MBUMY vs IOCJY Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, IOCJY has a market cap of 350.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while IOCJY trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas IOCJY's P/E ratio is 8.67. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IOCJY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is more volatile compared to IOCJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check IOCJY's competition here
MBUMY vs ELLRY Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, ELLRY has a market cap of 304.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while ELLRY trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas ELLRY's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ELLRY's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is more volatile compared to ELLRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check ELLRY's competition here
MBUMY vs EGKLF Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, EGKLF has a market cap of 302.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while EGKLF trades at $4.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas EGKLF's P/E ratio is -1.81. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EGKLF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is more volatile compared to EGKLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check EGKLF's competition here
MBUMY vs NPSGF Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, NPSGF has a market cap of 295M. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while NPSGF trades at $3.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas NPSGF's P/E ratio is 6.31. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NPSGF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is more volatile compared to NPSGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check NPSGF's competition here
MBUMY vs NPSGY Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, NPSGY has a market cap of 288.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while NPSGY trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas NPSGY's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NPSGY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is more volatile compared to NPSGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check NPSGY's competition here
MBUMY vs XNGIF Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, XNGIF has a market cap of 244.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while XNGIF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas XNGIF's P/E ratio is 6.43. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to XNGIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is more volatile compared to XNGIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check XNGIF's competition here
MBUMY vs WLMTF Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, WLMTF has a market cap of 195.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while WLMTF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas WLMTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WLMTF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is less volatile compared to WLMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check WLMTF's competition here
MBUMY vs AKBIF Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, AKBIF has a market cap of 192.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while AKBIF trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas AKBIF's P/E ratio is 10.14. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AKBIF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is less volatile compared to AKBIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check AKBIF's competition here
MBUMY vs AMGRF Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, AMGRF has a market cap of 191.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while AMGRF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas AMGRF's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AMGRF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is less volatile compared to AMGRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check AMGRF's competition here
MBUMY vs EXCOF Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, EXCOF has a market cap of 191.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while EXCOF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas EXCOF's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EXCOF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is more volatile compared to EXCOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check EXCOF's competition here
MBUMY vs SCTH Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, SCTH has a market cap of 163.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while SCTH trades at $4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas SCTH's P/E ratio is -464.00. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SCTH's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is more volatile compared to SCTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check SCTH's competition here
MBUMY vs HWAFF Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, HWAFF has a market cap of 158M. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while HWAFF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas HWAFF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HWAFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is more volatile compared to HWAFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check HWAFF's competition here
MBUMY vs KGAUF Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, KGAUF has a market cap of 120.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while KGAUF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas KGAUF's P/E ratio is -6.50. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KGAUF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is less volatile compared to KGAUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check KGAUF's competition here
MBUMY vs FESTF Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, FESTF has a market cap of 101.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while FESTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas FESTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FESTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is less volatile compared to FESTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check FESTF's competition here
MBUMY vs CMMCF Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, CMMCF has a market cap of 86.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while CMMCF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas CMMCF's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CMMCF's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is more volatile compared to CMMCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check CMMCF's competition here
MBUMY vs CAOHF Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, CAOHF has a market cap of 61.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while CAOHF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas CAOHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CAOHF's ROE of -14.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is more volatile compared to CAOHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check CAOHF's competition here
MBUMY vs LEAT Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, LEAT has a market cap of 60.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while LEAT trades at $9.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas LEAT's P/E ratio is -195.20. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LEAT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is more volatile compared to LEAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check LEAT's competition here
MBUMY vs CCEGF Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, CCEGF has a market cap of 48.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while CCEGF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas CCEGF's P/E ratio is -22.00. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CCEGF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is more volatile compared to CCEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check CCEGF's competition here
MBUMY vs STSGF Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, STSGF has a market cap of 38.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while STSGF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas STSGF's P/E ratio is 19.36. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to STSGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is more volatile compared to STSGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check STSGF's competition here
MBUMY vs NWFAF Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, NWFAF has a market cap of 37.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while NWFAF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas NWFAF's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NWFAF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is more volatile compared to NWFAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check NWFAF's competition here
MBUMY vs NFGRF Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, NFGRF has a market cap of 36.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while NFGRF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas NFGRF's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NFGRF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is less volatile compared to NFGRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check NFGRF's competition here
MBUMY vs VOAXF Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, VOAXF has a market cap of 27M. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while VOAXF trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas VOAXF's P/E ratio is -3.07. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VOAXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is more volatile compared to VOAXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check VOAXF's competition here
MBUMY vs CREVF Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, CREVF has a market cap of 23.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while CREVF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas CREVF's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CREVF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is more volatile compared to CREVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check CREVF's competition here
MBUMY vs UFMG Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, UFMG has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while UFMG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas UFMG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UFMG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is more volatile compared to UFMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check UFMG's competition here
MBUMY vs ATHHF Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, ATHHF has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while ATHHF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas ATHHF's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ATHHF's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is more volatile compared to ATHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check ATHHF's competition here
MBUMY vs AFFL Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, AFFL has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while AFFL trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas AFFL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AFFL's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is more volatile compared to AFFL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check AFFL's competition here
MBUMY vs AMTY Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, AMTY has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while AMTY trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas AMTY's P/E ratio is 3.50. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AMTY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is more volatile compared to AMTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check AMTY's competition here
MBUMY vs OPTI Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, OPTI has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while OPTI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas OPTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OPTI's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is less volatile compared to OPTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check OPTI's competition here
MBUMY vs CDTI Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, CDTI has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while CDTI trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas CDTI's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CDTI's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is less volatile compared to CDTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check CDTI's competition here
MBUMY vs SPKTF Comparison August 2025
MBUMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBUMY stands at 3.7B. In comparison, SPKTF has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MBUMY is priced at $7.28, while SPKTF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBUMY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.10, whereas SPKTF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, MBUMY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SPKTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MBUMY is more volatile compared to SPKTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBUMY.Check SPKTF's competition here