Montage Gold Corp.
Montage Gold Corp. MAUTF Peers
See (MAUTF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAUTF | $3.33 | -0.89% | 1.2B | -15.14 | -$0.22 | N/A |
| ZIJMF | $2.34 | +3.08% | 66.1B | 12.32 | $0.19 | +2.26% |
| OPYGY | $21.00 | N/A | 28.4B | 2.50 | $8.39 | +0.37% |
| GFIOF | $24.03 | N/A | 21.5B | 17.41 | $1.38 | +2.27% |
| NESRF | $13.51 | -0.30% | 19.3B | 25.49 | $0.53 | +1.57% |
| NSTYY | $12.40 | +25.38% | 14.3B | 33.51 | $0.37 | +1.41% |
| HCHDY | $27.14 | N/A | 14B | 12.92 | $2.10 | N/A |
| NCMGY | $15.59 | +2.84% | 13.9B | 17.92 | $0.87 | N/A |
| NCMGF | $15.20 | -2.53% | 13.6B | 17.47 | $0.87 | N/A |
| LUGDF | $52.59 | +0.94% | 12.7B | 23.69 | $2.22 | +2.27% |
Stock Comparison
MAUTF vs ZIJMF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ZIJMF has a market cap of 66.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while ZIJMF trades at $2.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas ZIJMF's P/E ratio is 12.32. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to ZIJMF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is more volatile compared to ZIJMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs OPYGY Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, OPYGY has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while OPYGY trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas OPYGY's P/E ratio is 2.50. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to OPYGY's ROE of +3.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is more volatile compared to OPYGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs GFIOF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GFIOF has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while GFIOF trades at $24.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas GFIOF's P/E ratio is 17.41. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to GFIOF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is more volatile compared to GFIOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs NESRF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NESRF has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while NESRF trades at $13.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas NESRF's P/E ratio is 25.49. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to NESRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is more volatile compared to NESRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs NSTYY Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NSTYY has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while NSTYY trades at $12.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas NSTYY's P/E ratio is 33.51. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to NSTYY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is more volatile compared to NSTYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs HCHDY Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, HCHDY has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while HCHDY trades at $27.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas HCHDY's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to HCHDY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is more volatile compared to HCHDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs NCMGY Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NCMGY has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while NCMGY trades at $15.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas NCMGY's P/E ratio is 17.92. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to NCMGY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is more volatile compared to NCMGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs NCMGF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NCMGF has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while NCMGF trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas NCMGF's P/E ratio is 17.47. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to NCMGF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is less volatile compared to NCMGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs LUGDF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, LUGDF has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while LUGDF trades at $52.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas LUGDF's P/E ratio is 23.69. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to LUGDF's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is more volatile compared to LUGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs KOZAY Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KOZAY has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while KOZAY trades at $3.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas KOZAY's P/E ratio is 6.96. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to KOZAY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is less volatile compared to KOZAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs CAHPF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CAHPF has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while CAHPF trades at $5.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas CAHPF's P/E ratio is 23.26. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to CAHPF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is more volatile compared to CAHPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs HGMCF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, HGMCF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while HGMCF trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas HGMCF's P/E ratio is 16.34. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to HGMCF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is more volatile compared to HGMCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs ZHAOF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ZHAOF has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while ZHAOF trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas ZHAOF's P/E ratio is 45.00. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to ZHAOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is less volatile compared to ZHAOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs AULGF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AULGF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while AULGF trades at $15.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas AULGF's P/E ratio is 159.00. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to AULGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is more volatile compared to AULGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs EDVMF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, EDVMF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while EDVMF trades at $30.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas EDVMF's P/E ratio is -73.76. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to EDVMF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is more volatile compared to EDVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs SBYSF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SBYSF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while SBYSF trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas SBYSF's P/E ratio is -11.64. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to SBYSF's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is more volatile compared to SBYSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs ARGTF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ARGTF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while ARGTF trades at $19.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas ARGTF's P/E ratio is -282.86. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to ARGTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is more volatile compared to ARGTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs DGMLF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DGMLF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while DGMLF trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas DGMLF's P/E ratio is -154.50. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to DGMLF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is less volatile compared to DGMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs PMNXF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PMNXF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while PMNXF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas PMNXF's P/E ratio is 9.62. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to PMNXF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is more volatile compared to PMNXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs OCANF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, OCANF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while OCANF trades at $4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas OCANF's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to OCANF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is less volatile compared to OCANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs ZIJMY Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ZIJMY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while ZIJMY trades at $45.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas ZIJMY's P/E ratio is 12.38. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to ZIJMY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is less volatile compared to ZIJMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs TORXF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TORXF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while TORXF trades at $34.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas TORXF's P/E ratio is 22.72. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to TORXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is more volatile compared to TORXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs KNTNF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KNTNF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while KNTNF trades at $11.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas KNTNF's P/E ratio is 15.47. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to KNTNF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is more volatile compared to KNTNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs ELKMF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ELKMF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while ELKMF trades at $2.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas ELKMF's P/E ratio is 30.75. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to ELKMF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is more volatile compared to ELKMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs CRNLF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CRNLF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while CRNLF trades at $6.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas CRNLF's P/E ratio is 46.68. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to CRNLF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is less volatile compared to CRNLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs DPMLF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DPMLF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while DPMLF trades at $15.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas DPMLF's P/E ratio is 11.73. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to DPMLF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is more volatile compared to DPMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs GRLGF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GRLGF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while GRLGF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas GRLGF's P/E ratio is -19.69. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to GRLGF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is less volatile compared to GRLGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs RGRNF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, RGRNF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while RGRNF trades at $3.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas RGRNF's P/E ratio is -316.00. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to RGRNF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is less volatile compared to RGRNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs GSISF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GSISF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while GSISF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas GSISF's P/E ratio is 28.57. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to GSISF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is more volatile compared to GSISF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs CELTF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CELTF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while CELTF trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas CELTF's P/E ratio is 26.86. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to CELTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is more volatile compared to CELTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs WDOFF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, WDOFF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while WDOFF trades at $14.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas WDOFF's P/E ratio is 15.99. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to WDOFF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is more volatile compared to WDOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs HCHDF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, HCHDF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while HCHDF trades at $4.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas HCHDF's P/E ratio is 21.79. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to HCHDF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is more volatile compared to HCHDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs RMLRF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, RMLRF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while RMLRF trades at $1.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas RMLRF's P/E ratio is 9.62. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to RMLRF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is more volatile compared to RMLRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs REDLF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, REDLF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while REDLF trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas REDLF's P/E ratio is 30.85. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to REDLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is less volatile compared to REDLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs CXBMF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CXBMF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while CXBMF trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas CXBMF's P/E ratio is 34.62. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to CXBMF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is less volatile compared to CXBMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs WFRSF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, WFRSF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while WFRSF trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas WFRSF's P/E ratio is 13.08. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to WFRSF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is more volatile compared to WFRSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs EOGSF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, EOGSF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while EOGSF trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas EOGSF's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to EOGSF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is less volatile compared to EOGSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs ORAAF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ORAAF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while ORAAF trades at $24.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas ORAAF's P/E ratio is -18.79. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to ORAAF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is more volatile compared to ORAAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs DRDGF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DRDGF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while DRDGF trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas DRDGF's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to DRDGF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is less volatile compared to DRDGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs OBNNF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, OBNNF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while OBNNF trades at $3.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas OBNNF's P/E ratio is -351.00. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to OBNNF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is more volatile compared to OBNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs PAFRF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PAFRF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while PAFRF trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas PAFRF's P/E ratio is 15.21. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to PAFRF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is less volatile compared to PAFRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs MWSNF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MWSNF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while MWSNF trades at $4.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas MWSNF's P/E ratio is -87.76. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to MWSNF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is more volatile compared to MWSNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs AURQF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AURQF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while AURQF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas AURQF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to AURQF's ROE of -2.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is more volatile compared to AURQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs RUPRF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, RUPRF has a market cap of 943.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while RUPRF trades at $4.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas RUPRF's P/E ratio is -201.50. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to RUPRF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is more volatile compared to RUPRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs SVLKF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SVLKF has a market cap of 927.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while SVLKF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas SVLKF's P/E ratio is 13.86. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to SVLKF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is more volatile compared to SVLKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs RMGGF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, RMGGF has a market cap of 915.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while RMGGF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas RMGGF's P/E ratio is -43.00. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to RMGGF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is less volatile compared to RMGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs SNWGF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SNWGF has a market cap of 889.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while SNWGF trades at $5.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas SNWGF's P/E ratio is -42.54. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to SNWGF's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is more volatile compared to SNWGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs BELGF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BELGF has a market cap of 885.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while BELGF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas BELGF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to BELGF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is less volatile compared to BELGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs SGSVF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SGSVF has a market cap of 880.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while SGSVF trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas SGSVF's P/E ratio is -79.00. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to SGSVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is more volatile compared to SGSVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs KRRGF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KRRGF has a market cap of 862.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while KRRGF trades at $4.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas KRRGF's P/E ratio is 80.50. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to KRRGF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is less volatile compared to KRRGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs PDIYF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PDIYF has a market cap of 681.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while PDIYF trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas PDIYF's P/E ratio is -26.00. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to PDIYF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is more volatile compared to PDIYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs WTGRF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, WTGRF has a market cap of 677.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while WTGRF trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas WTGRF's P/E ratio is 143.00. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to WTGRF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is more volatile compared to WTGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs RGDFF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, RGDFF has a market cap of 676.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while RGDFF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas RGDFF's P/E ratio is -13.61. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to RGDFF's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is more volatile compared to RGDFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs RMGGY Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, RMGGY has a market cap of 608.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while RMGGY trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas RMGGY's P/E ratio is -22.00. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to RMGGY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is less volatile compared to RMGGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs GUYGF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GUYGF has a market cap of 547.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while GUYGF trades at $2.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas GUYGF's P/E ratio is -75.83. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to GUYGF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is less volatile compared to GUYGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs ORZCF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ORZCF has a market cap of 530.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while ORZCF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas ORZCF's P/E ratio is 7.69. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to ORZCF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is less volatile compared to ORZCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs MNSAF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MNSAF has a market cap of 528.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while MNSAF trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas MNSAF's P/E ratio is 4.90. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to MNSAF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is more volatile compared to MNSAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs NVMLF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NVMLF has a market cap of 512.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while NVMLF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas NVMLF's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to NVMLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is less volatile compared to NVMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs ASGOF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ASGOF has a market cap of 506.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while ASGOF trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas ASGOF's P/E ratio is -6.31. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to ASGOF's ROE of -22.71%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is more volatile compared to ASGOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs ECRTF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ECRTF has a market cap of 488.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while ECRTF trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas ECRTF's P/E ratio is -9.72. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to ECRTF's ROE of -6.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is more volatile compared to ECRTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs RSRBF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, RSRBF has a market cap of 474.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while RSRBF trades at $2.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas RSRBF's P/E ratio is 82.00. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to RSRBF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is more volatile compared to RSRBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs ARNGF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ARNGF has a market cap of 468.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while ARNGF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas ARNGF's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to ARNGF's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is less volatile compared to ARNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs RMLFF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, RMLFF has a market cap of 424.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while RMLFF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas RMLFF's P/E ratio is -8.61. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to RMLFF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is more volatile compared to RMLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs RIOFF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, RIOFF has a market cap of 381.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while RIOFF trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas RIOFF's P/E ratio is 89.75. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to RIOFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is more volatile compared to RIOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs LMGDF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, LMGDF has a market cap of 377.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while LMGDF trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas LMGDF's P/E ratio is -6.94. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to LMGDF's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is more volatile compared to LMGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs PROBF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PROBF has a market cap of 377.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while PROBF trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas PROBF's P/E ratio is -15.41. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to PROBF's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is more volatile compared to PROBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs MNDJF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MNDJF has a market cap of 355M. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while MNDJF trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas MNDJF's P/E ratio is 6.36. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to MNDJF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is more volatile compared to MNDJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs KSKGF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KSKGF has a market cap of 344.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while KSKGF trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas KSKGF's P/E ratio is 2.47. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to KSKGF's ROE of +1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is less volatile compared to KSKGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs TPRXF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TPRXF has a market cap of 343.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while TPRXF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas TPRXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to TPRXF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is less volatile compared to TPRXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs THXPF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, THXPF has a market cap of 334.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while THXPF trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas THXPF's P/E ratio is 3.00. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to THXPF's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is more volatile compared to THXPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs MAKOF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MAKOF has a market cap of 301.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while MAKOF trades at $3.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas MAKOF's P/E ratio is 12.58. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to MAKOF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is more volatile compared to MAKOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs ALKEF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ALKEF has a market cap of 295.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while ALKEF trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas ALKEF's P/E ratio is 24.43. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to ALKEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is more volatile compared to ALKEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs FDMIF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, FDMIF has a market cap of 291M. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while FDMIF trades at $3.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas FDMIF's P/E ratio is -33.95. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to FDMIF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is less volatile compared to FDMIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs OGNRF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, OGNRF has a market cap of 288.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while OGNRF trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas OGNRF's P/E ratio is 143.00. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to OGNRF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is more volatile compared to OGNRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs MGDPF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MGDPF has a market cap of 278.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while MGDPF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas MGDPF's P/E ratio is -19.80. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to MGDPF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is less volatile compared to MGDPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs STPGF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, STPGF has a market cap of 260.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while STPGF trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas STPGF's P/E ratio is 5.42. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to STPGF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is more volatile compared to STPGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs ELEMF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ELEMF has a market cap of 256.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while ELEMF trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas ELEMF's P/E ratio is 52.13. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to ELEMF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is more volatile compared to ELEMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs OSIIF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, OSIIF has a market cap of 254.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while OSIIF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas OSIIF's P/E ratio is -5.83. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to OSIIF's ROE of +4.74%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is more volatile compared to OSIIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs OMGGF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, OMGGF has a market cap of 252.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while OMGGF trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas OMGGF's P/E ratio is -20.58. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to OMGGF's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is less volatile compared to OMGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs ERRSF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ERRSF has a market cap of 250.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while ERRSF trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas ERRSF's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to ERRSF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is less volatile compared to ERRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs WRLGF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, WRLGF has a market cap of 237.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while WRLGF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas WRLGF's P/E ratio is -2.54. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to WRLGF's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is more volatile compared to WRLGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs HSTXF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, HSTXF has a market cap of 233.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while HSTXF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas HSTXF's P/E ratio is 3.75. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to HSTXF's ROE of +1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is more volatile compared to HSTXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs JAGGF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, JAGGF has a market cap of 233.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while JAGGF trades at $2.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas JAGGF's P/E ratio is -36.75. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to JAGGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is more volatile compared to JAGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs STBMF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, STBMF has a market cap of 227.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while STBMF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas STBMF's P/E ratio is -4.20. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to STBMF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is more volatile compared to STBMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs GDRZF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GDRZF has a market cap of 221.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while GDRZF trades at $1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas GDRZF's P/E ratio is -19.60. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to GDRZF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is more volatile compared to GDRZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs THSGF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, THSGF has a market cap of 201.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while THSGF trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas THSGF's P/E ratio is 42.45. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to THSGF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is more volatile compared to THSGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs SRBIF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SRBIF has a market cap of 201.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while SRBIF trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas SRBIF's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to SRBIF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is more volatile compared to SRBIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs AGXKF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AGXKF has a market cap of 196.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while AGXKF trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas AGXKF's P/E ratio is -11.47. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to AGXKF's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is more volatile compared to AGXKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs SAAGF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SAAGF has a market cap of 193.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while SAAGF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas SAAGF's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to SAAGF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is more volatile compared to SAAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs CNLMF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CNLMF has a market cap of 193.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while CNLMF trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas CNLMF's P/E ratio is -8.59. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to CNLMF's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is more volatile compared to CNLMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs DCCNF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DCCNF has a market cap of 182.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while DCCNF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas DCCNF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to DCCNF's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is more volatile compared to DCCNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs CNMXF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CNMXF has a market cap of 179.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while CNMXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas CNMXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to CNMXF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is less volatile compared to CNMXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs MAIFF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MAIFF has a market cap of 163.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while MAIFF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas MAIFF's P/E ratio is -3.52. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to MAIFF's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is more volatile compared to MAIFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs EEYMF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, EEYMF has a market cap of 156.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while EEYMF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas EEYMF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to EEYMF's ROE of +1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is more volatile compared to EEYMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs GGAZF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GGAZF has a market cap of 148.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while GGAZF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas GGAZF's P/E ratio is -6.90. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to GGAZF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is less volatile compared to GGAZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs FFMGF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, FFMGF has a market cap of 145.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while FFMGF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas FFMGF's P/E ratio is -13.50. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to FFMGF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is less volatile compared to FFMGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs NVOOF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NVOOF has a market cap of 142.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while NVOOF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas NVOOF's P/E ratio is -10.64. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to NVOOF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is more volatile compared to NVOOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs DNGDF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DNGDF has a market cap of 140.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while DNGDF trades at $3.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas DNGDF's P/E ratio is 7.55. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to DNGDF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is more volatile compared to DNGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.
MAUTF vs SITKF Comparison
MAUTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAUTF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SITKF has a market cap of 137.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MAUTF is priced at $3.33, while SITKF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAUTF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.14, whereas SITKF's P/E ratio is -38.10. In terms of profitability, MAUTF's ROE is -0.47%, compared to SITKF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MAUTF is more volatile compared to SITKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAUTF.