Mary Agrotechnologies Inc.

MARY.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MARY.CN stands at 432279.00. In comparison, CLS.TO has a market cap of 17.61B. Regarding current trading prices, MARY.CN is priced at $0.01, while CLS.TO trades at $153.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MARY.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas CLS.TO's P/E ratio is 30.94. In terms of profitability, MARY.CN's ROE is +1.77%, compared to CLS.TO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MARY.CN is less volatile compared to CLS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARY.CN.

MARY.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MARY.CN stands at 432279.00. In comparison, WIFI.CN has a market cap of 17.59M. Regarding current trading prices, MARY.CN is priced at $0.01, while WIFI.CN trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MARY.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas WIFI.CN's P/E ratio is -1.94. In terms of profitability, MARY.CN's ROE is +1.77%, compared to WIFI.CN's ROE of -4.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MARY.CN is less volatile compared to WIFI.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARY.CN.

MARY.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MARY.CN stands at 432279.00. In comparison, HEAT.CN has a market cap of 10.29M. Regarding current trading prices, MARY.CN is priced at $0.01, while HEAT.CN trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MARY.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas HEAT.CN's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, MARY.CN's ROE is +1.77%, compared to HEAT.CN's ROE of -5.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MARY.CN is less volatile compared to HEAT.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARY.CN.

MARY.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MARY.CN stands at 432279.00. In comparison, ZTE.CN has a market cap of 8.36M. Regarding current trading prices, MARY.CN is priced at $0.01, while ZTE.CN trades at $0.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MARY.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas ZTE.CN's P/E ratio is 4.50. In terms of profitability, MARY.CN's ROE is +1.77%, compared to ZTE.CN's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MARY.CN is less volatile compared to ZTE.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARY.CN.