Celestica Inc. (TSX: CLS.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Celestica Inc. (TSX: CLS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS.TO stands at 53.3B. In comparison, ZTE.CN has a market cap of 15.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS.TO is priced at CA$463.87 on the TSX, while ZTE.CN trades at CA$0.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.37, whereas ZTE.CN's P/E ratio is 9.04. In terms of profitability, CLS.TO's ROE is +0.50%, compared to ZTE.CN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS.TO is more volatile compared to ZTE.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.TO.Check ZTE.CN's competition here

Celestica Inc. (TSX: CLS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS.TO stands at 53.3B. In comparison, WIFI.CN has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS.TO is priced at CA$463.87 on the TSX, while WIFI.CN trades at CA$0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.37, whereas WIFI.CN's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, CLS.TO's ROE is +0.50%, compared to WIFI.CN's ROE of +1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS.TO is more volatile compared to WIFI.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.TO.Check WIFI.CN's competition here

Celestica Inc. (TSX: CLS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS.TO stands at 53.3B. In comparison, MARY.CN has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS.TO is priced at CA$463.87 on the TSX, while MARY.CN trades at CA$0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.37, whereas MARY.CN's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, CLS.TO's ROE is +0.50%, compared to MARY.CN's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS.TO is more volatile compared to MARY.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.TO.Check MARY.CN's competition here

Celestica Inc. (TSX: CLS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS.TO stands at 53.3B. In comparison, PHO.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLS.TO is priced at CA$463.87 on the TSX, while PHO.TO trades at CA$3.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.37, whereas PHO.TO's P/E ratio is 36.36. In terms of profitability, CLS.TO's ROE is +0.50%, compared to PHO.TO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS.TO is more volatile compared to PHO.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.TO.Check PHO.TO's competition here