Lyxor EuroMTS Highest Rated Macro-Weighted Govt Bond 3-5Y (DR) UCITS ETF
Lyxor EuroMTS Highest Rated Macro-Weighted Govt Bond 3-5Y (DR) UCITS ETF (MA35.PA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MA35.PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MA35.PA | €107.27 | -0.11% | 50.2M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| CSPX.AS | €625.72 | -0.33% | 113.6B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| IWDA.AS | €111.96 | -0.57% | 110.4B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| VUSA.AS | €110.58 | -0.38% | 67.2B | N/A | N/A | +0.98% |
| VWRL.AS | €143.30 | -0.76% | 50.7B | N/A | N/A | +1.40% |
| SP5C.PA | €421.55 | -0.39% | 24B | 27.83 | €15.14 | N/A |
| SP5H.PA | €323.40 | -1.39% | 23.7B | 26.90 | €12.07 | +1.02% |
| IUSA.AS | €58.15 | -0.32% | 17.1B | N/A | N/A | +0.95% |
| ISFA.AS | €11.65 | -0.38% | 16.9B | N/A | N/A | +2.90% |
| CSH2.PA | €108.64 | +0.04% | 16B | 28.26 | €3.84 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MA35.PA vs CSPX.AS Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, CSPX.AS has a market cap of 113.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while CSPX.AS trades at €625.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSPX.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSPX.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to CSPX.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check CSPX.AS's competition here
MA35.PA vs IWDA.AS Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, IWDA.AS has a market cap of 110.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while IWDA.AS trades at €111.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IWDA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWDA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to IWDA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check IWDA.AS's competition here
MA35.PA vs VUSA.AS Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, VUSA.AS has a market cap of 67.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while VUSA.AS trades at €110.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VUSA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VUSA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to VUSA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check VUSA.AS's competition here
MA35.PA vs VWRL.AS Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, VWRL.AS has a market cap of 50.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while VWRL.AS trades at €143.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VWRL.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VWRL.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to VWRL.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check VWRL.AS's competition here
MA35.PA vs SP5C.PA Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, SP5C.PA has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while SP5C.PA trades at €421.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SP5C.PA's P/E ratio is 27.83. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SP5C.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to SP5C.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check SP5C.PA's competition here
MA35.PA vs SP5H.PA Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, SP5H.PA has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while SP5H.PA trades at €323.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SP5H.PA's P/E ratio is 26.90. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SP5H.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to SP5H.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check SP5H.PA's competition here
MA35.PA vs IUSA.AS Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, IUSA.AS has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while IUSA.AS trades at €58.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUSA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUSA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to IUSA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check IUSA.AS's competition here
MA35.PA vs ISFA.AS Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, ISFA.AS has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while ISFA.AS trades at €11.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ISFA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ISFA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to ISFA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check ISFA.AS's competition here
MA35.PA vs CSH2.PA Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, CSH2.PA has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while CSH2.PA trades at €108.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSH2.PA's P/E ratio is 28.26. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSH2.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to CSH2.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check CSH2.PA's competition here
MA35.PA vs HAL.AS Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, HAL.AS has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while HAL.AS trades at €170.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAL.AS's P/E ratio is 8.95. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HAL.AS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to HAL.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check HAL.AS's competition here
MA35.PA vs AMUN.PA Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, AMUN.PA has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while AMUN.PA trades at €73.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMUN.PA's P/E ratio is 9.12. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AMUN.PA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to AMUN.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check AMUN.PA's competition here
MA35.PA vs MEUD.PA Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, MEUD.PA has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while MEUD.PA trades at €288.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MEUD.PA's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MEUD.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to MEUD.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check MEUD.PA's competition here
MA35.PA vs I500.AS Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, I500.AS has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while I500.AS trades at €11.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas I500.AS's P/E ratio is 26.97. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to I500.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to I500.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check I500.AS's competition here
MA35.PA vs I50D.AS Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, I50D.AS has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while I50D.AS trades at €7.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas I50D.AS's P/E ratio is 26.95. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to I50D.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to I50D.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check I50D.AS's competition here
MA35.PA vs GOLD.PA Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, GOLD.PA has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while GOLD.PA trades at €176.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GOLD.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GOLD.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to GOLD.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check GOLD.PA's competition here
MA35.PA vs IMEU.AS Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, IMEU.AS has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while IMEU.AS trades at €37.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IMEU.AS's P/E ratio is 18.48. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IMEU.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to IMEU.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check IMEU.AS's competition here
MA35.PA vs VHYL.AS Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, VHYL.AS has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while VHYL.AS trades at €73.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VHYL.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VHYL.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to VHYL.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check VHYL.AS's competition here
MA35.PA vs GBLB.BR Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, GBLB.BR has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while GBLB.BR trades at €78.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBLB.BR's P/E ratio is 78.17. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GBLB.BR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to GBLB.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check GBLB.BR's competition here
MA35.PA vs PSH.AS Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, PSH.AS has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while PSH.AS trades at €51.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSH.AS's P/E ratio is 4.41. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PSH.AS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to PSH.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check PSH.AS's competition here
MA35.PA vs WLD.PA Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, WLD.PA has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while WLD.PA trades at €376.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WLD.PA's P/E ratio is 24.65. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WLD.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to WLD.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check WLD.PA's competition here
MA35.PA vs WLDHC.PA Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, WLDHC.PA has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while WLDHC.PA trades at €15.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WLDHC.PA's P/E ratio is 24.02. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WLDHC.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to WLDHC.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check WLDHC.PA's competition here
MA35.PA vs WLDH.PA Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, WLDH.PA has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while WLDH.PA trades at €234.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WLDH.PA's P/E ratio is 24.03. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WLDH.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to WLDH.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check WLDH.PA's competition here
MA35.PA vs CBUG.AS Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, CBUG.AS has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while CBUG.AS trades at €4.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBUG.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CBUG.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA and CBUG.AS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CBUG.AS's competition here
MA35.PA vs CEUU.AS Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, CEUU.AS has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while CEUU.AS trades at €11.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CEUU.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CEUU.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to CEUU.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check CEUU.AS's competition here
MA35.PA vs SOF.BR Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, SOF.BR has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while SOF.BR trades at €226.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOF.BR's P/E ratio is 19.26. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SOF.BR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to SOF.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check SOF.BR's competition here
MA35.PA vs IEMM.AS Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, IEMM.AS has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while IEMM.AS trades at €49.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IEMM.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IEMM.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to IEMM.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check IEMM.AS's competition here
MA35.PA vs PHAU.AS Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, PHAU.AS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while PHAU.AS trades at €412.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHAU.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PHAU.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to PHAU.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check PHAU.AS's competition here
MA35.PA vs AEME.PA Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, AEME.PA has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while AEME.PA trades at €86.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEME.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AEME.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to AEME.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check AEME.PA's competition here
MA35.PA vs SJPD.AS Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, SJPD.AS has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while SJPD.AS trades at €7.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SJPD.AS's P/E ratio is 17.21. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SJPD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to SJPD.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check SJPD.AS's competition here
MA35.PA vs IWRD.AS Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, IWRD.AS has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while IWRD.AS trades at €80.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IWRD.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWRD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to IWRD.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check IWRD.AS's competition here
MA35.PA vs IEMA.AS Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, IEMA.AS has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while IEMA.AS trades at €47.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IEMA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IEMA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to IEMA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check IEMA.AS's competition here
MA35.PA vs VEUR.AS Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, VEUR.AS has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while VEUR.AS trades at €46.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VEUR.AS's P/E ratio is 18.70. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VEUR.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to VEUR.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check VEUR.AS's competition here
MA35.PA vs LCWD.PA Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, LCWD.PA has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while LCWD.PA trades at €19.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LCWD.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LCWD.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to LCWD.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check LCWD.PA's competition here
MA35.PA vs SJPE.AS Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, SJPE.AS has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while SJPE.AS trades at €13.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SJPE.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SJPE.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to SJPE.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check SJPE.AS's competition here
MA35.PA vs ECRP.PA Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, ECRP.PA has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while ECRP.PA trades at €53.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ECRP.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ECRP.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to ECRP.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check ECRP.PA's competition here
MA35.PA vs CC4.PA Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, CC4.PA has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while CC4.PA trades at €225.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CC4.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CC4.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA and CC4.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CC4.PA's competition here
MA35.PA vs IJPA.AS Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, IJPA.AS has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while IJPA.AS trades at €62.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IJPA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IJPA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to IJPA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check IJPA.AS's competition here
MA35.PA vs CW8.PA Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, CW8.PA has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while CW8.PA trades at €609.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CW8.PA's P/E ratio is 24.67. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CW8.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to CW8.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check CW8.PA's competition here
MA35.PA vs EWLD.PA Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, EWLD.PA has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while EWLD.PA trades at €36.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EWLD.PA's P/E ratio is 24.68. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EWLD.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to EWLD.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check EWLD.PA's competition here
MA35.PA vs 500.PA Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, 500.PA has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while 500.PA trades at €115.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 500.PA's P/E ratio is 27.83. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 500.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to 500.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check 500.PA's competition here
MA35.PA vs TDIV.AS Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, TDIV.AS has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while TDIV.AS trades at €51.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TDIV.AS's P/E ratio is 14.99. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TDIV.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to TDIV.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check TDIV.AS's competition here
MA35.PA vs AUEM.PA Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, AUEM.PA has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while AUEM.PA trades at €7.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AUEM.PA's P/E ratio is 16.91. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AUEM.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to AUEM.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check AUEM.PA's competition here
MA35.PA vs EUEA.AS Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, EUEA.AS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while EUEA.AS trades at €58.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUEA.AS's P/E ratio is 18.20. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUEA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to EUEA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check EUEA.AS's competition here
MA35.PA vs KBCA.BR Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, KBCA.BR has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while KBCA.BR trades at €71.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KBCA.BR's P/E ratio is 17.57. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KBCA.BR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to KBCA.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check KBCA.BR's competition here
MA35.PA vs UST.PA Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, UST.PA has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while UST.PA trades at €87.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UST.PA's P/E ratio is 33.23. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UST.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to UST.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check UST.PA's competition here
MA35.PA vs C50U.PA Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, C50U.PA has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while C50U.PA trades at €172.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas C50U.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to C50U.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to C50U.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check C50U.PA's competition here
MA35.PA vs ALLFG.AS Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, ALLFG.AS has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while ALLFG.AS trades at €8.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALLFG.AS's P/E ratio is -32.35. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ALLFG.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to ALLFG.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check ALLFG.AS's competition here
MA35.PA vs S500.PA Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, S500.PA has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while S500.PA trades at €169.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas S500.PA's P/E ratio is 28.11. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to S500.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to S500.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check S500.PA's competition here
MA35.PA vs S500H.PA Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, S500H.PA has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while S500H.PA trades at €94.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas S500H.PA's P/E ratio is 27.14. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to S500H.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to S500H.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check S500H.PA's competition here
MA35.PA vs REINA.AS Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, REINA.AS has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while REINA.AS trades at €27.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas REINA.AS's P/E ratio is 37.57. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to REINA.AS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to REINA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check REINA.AS's competition here
MA35.PA vs AEEM.PA Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, AEEM.PA has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while AEEM.PA trades at €6.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEEM.PA's P/E ratio is 17.15. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AEEM.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to AEEM.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check AEEM.PA's competition here
MA35.PA vs USAC.PA Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, USAC.PA has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while USAC.PA trades at €578.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USAC.PA's P/E ratio is 27.85. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USAC.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA and USAC.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check USAC.PA's competition here
MA35.PA vs USA.PA Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, USA.PA has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while USA.PA trades at €529.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USA.PA's P/E ratio is 27.56. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USA.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to USA.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check USA.PA's competition here
MA35.PA vs EXCH.AS Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, EXCH.AS has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while EXCH.AS trades at €7.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXCH.AS's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXCH.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to EXCH.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check EXCH.AS's competition here
MA35.PA vs VERX.AS Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, VERX.AS has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while VERX.AS trades at €45.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VERX.AS's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VERX.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to VERX.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check VERX.AS's competition here
MA35.PA vs C50.PA Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, C50.PA has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while C50.PA trades at €150.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas C50.PA's P/E ratio is 17.67. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to C50.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to C50.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check C50.PA's competition here
MA35.PA vs SEMD.AS Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, SEMD.AS has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while SEMD.AS trades at €6.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEMD.AS's P/E ratio is 16.89. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEMD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA and SEMD.AS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SEMD.AS's competition here
MA35.PA vs CD5.PA Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, CD5.PA has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while CD5.PA trades at €90.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CD5.PA's P/E ratio is 17.61. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CD5.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to CD5.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check CD5.PA's competition here
MA35.PA vs CAC.PA Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, CAC.PA has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while CAC.PA trades at €78.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAC.PA's P/E ratio is 17.49. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CAC.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to CAC.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check CAC.PA's competition here
MA35.PA vs CACC.PA Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, CACC.PA has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while CACC.PA trades at €39.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CACC.PA's P/E ratio is 17.46. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CACC.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to CACC.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check CACC.PA's competition here
MA35.PA vs ICHD.AS Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, ICHD.AS has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while ICHD.AS trades at €5.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ICHD.AS's P/E ratio is 12.83. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ICHD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA and ICHD.AS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ICHD.AS's competition here
MA35.PA vs ICHN.AS Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, ICHN.AS has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while ICHN.AS trades at €5.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ICHN.AS's P/E ratio is 12.81. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ICHN.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to ICHN.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check ICHN.AS's competition here
MA35.PA vs MSE.PA Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, MSE.PA has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while MSE.PA trades at €63.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSE.PA's P/E ratio is 17.61. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MSE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to MSE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check MSE.PA's competition here
MA35.PA vs 500X.AS Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, 500X.AS has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while 500X.AS trades at €42.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 500X.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 500X.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to 500X.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check 500X.AS's competition here
MA35.PA vs WSRI.PA Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, WSRI.PA has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while WSRI.PA trades at €103.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WSRI.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WSRI.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to WSRI.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check WSRI.PA's competition here
MA35.PA vs EEUE.PA Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, EEUE.PA has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while EEUE.PA trades at €18.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EEUE.PA's P/E ratio is 18.30. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EEUE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to EEUE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check EEUE.PA's competition here
MA35.PA vs AGGD.AS Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, AGGD.AS has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while AGGD.AS trades at €5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGGD.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AGGD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA and AGGD.AS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AGGD.AS's competition here
MA35.PA vs SRIL.AS Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, SRIL.AS has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while SRIL.AS trades at €11.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRIL.AS's P/E ratio is 23.95. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SRIL.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA and SRIL.AS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SRIL.AS's competition here
MA35.PA vs GLUH.AS Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, GLUH.AS has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while GLUH.AS trades at €4.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLUH.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLUH.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to GLUH.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check GLUH.AS's competition here
MA35.PA vs EHYA.AS Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, EHYA.AS has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while EHYA.AS trades at €5.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EHYA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EHYA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to EHYA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check EHYA.AS's competition here
MA35.PA vs EHYD.AS Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, EHYD.AS has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while EHYD.AS trades at €4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EHYD.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EHYD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to EHYD.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check EHYD.AS's competition here
MA35.PA vs ROLA.AS Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, ROLA.AS has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while ROLA.AS trades at €66.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ROLA.AS's P/E ratio is 6.56. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ROLA.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA and ROLA.AS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ROLA.AS's competition here
MA35.PA vs WESE.PA Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, WESE.PA has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while WESE.PA trades at €74.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WESE.PA's P/E ratio is 24.56. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WESE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA and WESE.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WESE.PA's competition here
MA35.PA vs GEMU.PA Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, GEMU.PA has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while GEMU.PA trades at €9.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GEMU.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GEMU.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA and GEMU.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GEMU.PA's competition here
MA35.PA vs MF.PA Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, MF.PA has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while MF.PA trades at €77.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MF.PA's P/E ratio is -19.68. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MF.PA's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to MF.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check MF.PA's competition here
MA35.PA vs IDSE.AS Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, IDSE.AS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while IDSE.AS trades at €136.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IDSE.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IDSE.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to IDSE.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check IDSE.AS's competition here
MA35.PA vs ISED.AS Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, ISED.AS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while ISED.AS trades at €7.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ISED.AS's P/E ratio is 20.29. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ISED.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to ISED.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check ISED.AS's competition here
MA35.PA vs CB3.PA Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, CB3.PA has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while CB3.PA trades at €220.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CB3.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CB3.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to CB3.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check CB3.PA's competition here
MA35.PA vs PHAG.AS Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, PHAG.AS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while PHAG.AS trades at €65.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHAG.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PHAG.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to PHAG.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check PHAG.AS's competition here
MA35.PA vs BNKE.PA Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, BNKE.PA has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while BNKE.PA trades at €295.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNKE.PA's P/E ratio is 10.65. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BNKE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to BNKE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check BNKE.PA's competition here
MA35.PA vs IMBE.AS Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, IMBE.AS has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while IMBE.AS trades at €4.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IMBE.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IMBE.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to IMBE.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check IMBE.AS's competition here
MA35.PA vs BREB.BR Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, BREB.BR has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while BREB.BR trades at €103.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BREB.BR's P/E ratio is 60.82. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BREB.BR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to BREB.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check BREB.BR's competition here
MA35.PA vs ESE.PA Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, ESE.PA has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while ESE.PA trades at €29.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESE.PA's P/E ratio is 27.83. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ESE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to ESE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check ESE.PA's competition here
MA35.PA vs SGLU.AS Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, SGLU.AS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while SGLU.AS trades at €5.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGLU.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SGLU.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to SGLU.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check SGLU.AS's competition here
MA35.PA vs EPAB.PA Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, EPAB.PA has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while EPAB.PA trades at €37.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EPAB.PA's P/E ratio is 16.22. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EPAB.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to EPAB.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check EPAB.PA's competition here
MA35.PA vs SUOA.AS Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, SUOA.AS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while SUOA.AS trades at €5.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUOA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SUOA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to SUOA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check SUOA.AS's competition here
MA35.PA vs TKO.PA Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, TKO.PA has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while TKO.PA trades at €15.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TKO.PA's P/E ratio is 15.35. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TKO.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to TKO.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check TKO.PA's competition here
MA35.PA vs RF.PA Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, RF.PA has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while RF.PA trades at €41.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RF.PA's P/E ratio is -4.57. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RF.PA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to RF.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check RF.PA's competition here
MA35.PA vs TI5A.AS Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, TI5A.AS has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while TI5A.AS trades at €115.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TI5A.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TI5A.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to TI5A.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check TI5A.AS's competition here
MA35.PA vs BNK.PA Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, BNK.PA has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while BNK.PA trades at €56.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNK.PA's P/E ratio is 11.22. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BNK.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to BNK.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check BNK.PA's competition here
MA35.PA vs JAPB.AS Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, JAPB.AS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while JAPB.AS trades at €922.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JAPB.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JAPB.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA and JAPB.AS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JAPB.AS's competition here
MA35.PA vs TNOW.PA Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, TNOW.PA has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while TNOW.PA trades at €926.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TNOW.PA's P/E ratio is 35.76. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TNOW.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to TNOW.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check TNOW.PA's competition here
MA35.PA vs ANX.PA Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, ANX.PA has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while ANX.PA trades at €244.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANX.PA's P/E ratio is 33.11. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ANX.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to ANX.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check ANX.PA's competition here
MA35.PA vs SEMI.AS Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, SEMI.AS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while SEMI.AS trades at €12.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEMI.AS's P/E ratio is 36.79. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEMI.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to SEMI.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check SEMI.AS's competition here
MA35.PA vs IGLE.AS Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, IGLE.AS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while IGLE.AS trades at €3.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGLE.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGLE.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to IGLE.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check IGLE.AS's competition here
MA35.PA vs IUHE.AS Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, IUHE.AS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while IUHE.AS trades at €6.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUHE.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUHE.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to IUHE.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check IUHE.AS's competition here
MA35.PA vs AASI.PA Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, AASI.PA has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while AASI.PA trades at €48.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AASI.PA's P/E ratio is 18.23. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AASI.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to AASI.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check AASI.PA's competition here
MA35.PA vs ACWI.PA Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, ACWI.PA has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while ACWI.PA trades at €533.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACWI.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ACWI.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to ACWI.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check ACWI.PA's competition here
MA35.PA vs USRI.PA Comparison March 2026
MA35.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA35.PA stands at 50.2M. In comparison, USRI.PA has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MA35.PA is priced at €107.27, while USRI.PA trades at €102.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA35.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USRI.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA35.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USRI.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA35.PA is less volatile compared to USRI.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA35.PA.Check USRI.PA's competition here