Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF
Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF LYSPH.SW Peers
See (LYSPH.SW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LYSPH.SW | CHF 228.85 | +0.48% | 17B | N/A | N/A | +1.28% |
| PGHN.SW | CHF 1,080.00 | -0.19% | 28B | 25.05 | CHF 43.11 | +3.89% |
| EQCH.SW | CHF 358.70 | -0.79% | 10.9B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| BAER.SW | CHF 52.76 | +0.61% | 10.8B | 10.62 | CHF 4.97 | +4.93% |
| IMEA.SW | CHF 81.75 | +0.50% | 10.5B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| XD9C.SW | CHF 136.42 | +0.09% | 8.6B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| VZN.SW | CHF 175.80 | +0.46% | 6.9B | 31.91 | CHF 5.51 | +1.55% |
| VHYL.SW | CHF 60.65 | +0.63% | 5.7B | N/A | N/A | +3.17% |
| EMUCHF.SW | CHF 23.89 | +0.19% | 5.7B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| WSRUS.SW | CHF 28.35 | +0.60% | 4.7B | 28.39 | CHF 1.00 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
LYSPH.SW vs PGHN.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, PGHN.SW has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while PGHN.SW trades at CHF 1,080.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PGHN.SW's P/E ratio is 25.05. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to PGHN.SW's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is less volatile compared to PGHN.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs EQCH.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, EQCH.SW has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while EQCH.SW trades at CHF 358.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EQCH.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to EQCH.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is less volatile compared to EQCH.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs BAER.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, BAER.SW has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while BAER.SW trades at CHF 52.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BAER.SW's P/E ratio is 10.62. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to BAER.SW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is less volatile compared to BAER.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs IMEA.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, IMEA.SW has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while IMEA.SW trades at CHF 81.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IMEA.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to IMEA.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is more volatile compared to IMEA.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs XD9C.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, XD9C.SW has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while XD9C.SW trades at CHF 136.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XD9C.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to XD9C.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is less volatile compared to XD9C.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs VZN.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, VZN.SW has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while VZN.SW trades at CHF 175.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VZN.SW's P/E ratio is 31.91. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to VZN.SW's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is less volatile compared to VZN.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs VHYL.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, VHYL.SW has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while VHYL.SW trades at CHF 60.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VHYL.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to VHYL.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is less volatile compared to VHYL.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs EMUCHF.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, EMUCHF.SW has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while EMUCHF.SW trades at CHF 23.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMUCHF.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to EMUCHF.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is more volatile compared to EMUCHF.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs WSRUS.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, WSRUS.SW has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while WSRUS.SW trades at CHF 28.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WSRUS.SW's P/E ratio is 28.39. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to WSRUS.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is more volatile compared to WSRUS.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs CSSX5E.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, CSSX5E.SW has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while CSSX5E.SW trades at CHF 202.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSSX5E.SW's P/E ratio is 17.27. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to CSSX5E.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is less volatile compared to CSSX5E.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs AWESGS.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, AWESGS.SW has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while AWESGS.SW trades at CHF 17.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AWESGS.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to AWESGS.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is less volatile compared to AWESGS.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs CHDVD.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, CHDVD.SW has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while CHDVD.SW trades at CHF 171.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHDVD.SW's P/E ratio is 19.78. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to CHDVD.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is more volatile compared to CHDVD.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs CHSPI.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, CHSPI.SW has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while CHSPI.SW trades at CHF 149.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHSPI.SW's P/E ratio is 22.98. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to CHSPI.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is less volatile compared to CHSPI.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs MSEC.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, MSEC.SW has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while MSEC.SW trades at CHF 181.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSEC.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to MSEC.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is less volatile compared to MSEC.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs VONN.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, VONN.SW has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while VONN.SW trades at CHF 63.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VONN.SW's P/E ratio is 13.55. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to VONN.SW's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is less volatile compared to VONN.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs VJPN.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, VJPN.SW has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while VJPN.SW trades at CHF 32.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VJPN.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to VJPN.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is more volatile compared to VJPN.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs XMCJ.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, XMCJ.SW has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while XMCJ.SW trades at CHF 27.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XMCJ.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to XMCJ.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is more volatile compared to XMCJ.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs SMICHA.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, SMICHA.SW has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while SMICHA.SW trades at CHF 127.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMICHA.SW's P/E ratio is 22.52. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to SMICHA.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is less volatile compared to SMICHA.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs IBGX.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, IBGX.SW has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while IBGX.SW trades at CHF 151.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBGX.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to IBGX.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is more volatile compared to IBGX.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs XDUE.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, XDUE.SW has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while XDUE.SW trades at CHF 24.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDUE.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to XDUE.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is less volatile compared to XDUE.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs CSSMI.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, CSSMI.SW has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while CSSMI.SW trades at CHF 128.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSSMI.SW's P/E ratio is 22.57. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to CSSMI.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is less volatile compared to CSSMI.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs XSMC.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, XSMC.SW has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while XSMC.SW trades at CHF 154.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XSMC.SW's P/E ratio is 22.82. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to XSMC.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is more volatile compared to XSMC.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs AUCHAH.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, AUCHAH.SW has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while AUCHAH.SW trades at CHF 113.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AUCHAH.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to AUCHAH.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is less volatile compared to AUCHAH.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs IMBA.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, IMBA.SW has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while IMBA.SW trades at CHF 4.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IMBA.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to IMBA.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is more volatile compared to IMBA.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs FWRA.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, FWRA.SW has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while FWRA.SW trades at CHF 6.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FWRA.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to FWRA.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is less volatile compared to FWRA.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs SRECHA.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, SRECHA.SW has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while SRECHA.SW trades at CHF 10.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRECHA.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to SRECHA.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is less volatile compared to SRECHA.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs SHIR.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, SHIR.SW has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while SHIR.SW trades at CHF 4.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHIR.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to SHIR.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is more volatile compared to SHIR.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs IWDC.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, IWDC.SW has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while IWDC.SW trades at CHF 77.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IWDC.SW's P/E ratio is 22.92. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to IWDC.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is less volatile compared to IWDC.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs DAXD.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, DAXD.SW has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while DAXD.SW trades at CHF 84.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DAXD.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to DAXD.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is more volatile compared to DAXD.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs HBMN.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, HBMN.SW has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while HBMN.SW trades at CHF 177.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HBMN.SW's P/E ratio is 64.84. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to HBMN.SW's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is less volatile compared to HBMN.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs XDPC.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, XDPC.SW has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while XDPC.SW trades at CHF 55.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDPC.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to XDPC.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is more volatile compared to XDPC.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs CSSMIM.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, CSSMIM.SW has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while CSSMIM.SW trades at CHF 299.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSSMIM.SW's P/E ratio is 28.55. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to CSSMIM.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is more volatile compared to CSSMIM.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs IUKD.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, IUKD.SW has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while IUKD.SW trades at CHF 9.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUKD.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to IUKD.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is more volatile compared to IUKD.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs IDVY.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, IDVY.SW has a market cap of 868.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while IDVY.SW trades at CHF 20.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IDVY.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to IDVY.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is more volatile compared to IDVY.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs FGQD.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, FGQD.SW has a market cap of 691.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while FGQD.SW trades at CHF 7.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FGQD.SW's P/E ratio is 17.63. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to FGQD.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is more volatile compared to FGQD.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs CSSLI.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, CSSLI.SW has a market cap of 670.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while CSSLI.SW trades at CHF 215.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSSLI.SW's P/E ratio is 23.75. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to CSSLI.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is less volatile compared to CSSLI.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs ASOL.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, ASOL.SW has a market cap of 643.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while ASOL.SW trades at CHF 79.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASOL.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to ASOL.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is less volatile compared to ASOL.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs IUSC.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, IUSC.SW has a market cap of 613.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while IUSC.SW trades at CHF 91.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUSC.SW's P/E ratio is 26.18. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to IUSC.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is less volatile compared to IUSC.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs STNX.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, STNX.SW has a market cap of 607.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while STNX.SW trades at CHF 175.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STNX.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to STNX.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is more volatile compared to STNX.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs MLP.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, MLP.SW has a market cap of 559.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while MLP.SW trades at CHF 5.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MLP.SW's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to MLP.SW's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is more volatile compared to MLP.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs XUHY.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, XUHY.SW has a market cap of 514.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while XUHY.SW trades at CHF 10.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XUHY.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to XUHY.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is more volatile compared to XUHY.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs CSBGC0.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, CSBGC0.SW has a market cap of 491M. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while CSBGC0.SW trades at CHF 106.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSBGC0.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to CSBGC0.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is more volatile compared to CSBGC0.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs CSGLDC.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, CSGLDC.SW has a market cap of 478.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while CSGLDC.SW trades at CHF 219.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSGLDC.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to CSGLDC.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is less volatile compared to CSGLDC.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs STZX.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, STZX.SW has a market cap of 475.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while STZX.SW trades at CHF 109.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STZX.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to STZX.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is more volatile compared to STZX.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs XDCH.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, XDCH.SW has a market cap of 439.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while XDCH.SW trades at CHF 25.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDCH.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to XDCH.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is more volatile compared to XDCH.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs ID25.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, ID25.SW has a market cap of 405.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while ID25.SW trades at CHF 108.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ID25.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to ID25.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is more volatile compared to ID25.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs DXJD.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, DXJD.SW has a market cap of 378.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while DXJD.SW trades at CHF 38.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DXJD.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to DXJD.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is more volatile compared to DXJD.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs CMES.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, CMES.SW has a market cap of 371.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while CMES.SW trades at CHF 4.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMES.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to CMES.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is less volatile compared to CMES.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs LEON.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, LEON.SW has a market cap of 313.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while LEON.SW trades at CHF 17.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LEON.SW's P/E ratio is 56.06. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to LEON.SW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is less volatile compared to LEON.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs COMS.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, COMS.SW has a market cap of 304.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while COMS.SW trades at CHF 12.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COMS.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to COMS.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is more volatile compared to COMS.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs USCHWH.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, USCHWH.SW has a market cap of 269.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while USCHWH.SW trades at CHF 43.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USCHWH.SW's P/E ratio is 26.21. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to USCHWH.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is less volatile compared to USCHWH.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs SMOR.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, SMOR.SW has a market cap of 264.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while SMOR.SW trades at CHF 95.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMOR.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to SMOR.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is more volatile compared to SMOR.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs CSBGC3.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, CSBGC3.SW has a market cap of 237.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while CSBGC3.SW trades at CHF 64.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSBGC3.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to CSBGC3.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is more volatile compared to CSBGC3.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs LQCE.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, LQCE.SW has a market cap of 203.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while LQCE.SW trades at CHF 4.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LQCE.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to LQCE.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is less volatile compared to LQCE.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs AETH.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, AETH.SW has a market cap of 201.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while AETH.SW trades at CHF 22.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AETH.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to AETH.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is less volatile compared to AETH.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs MVEC.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, MVEC.SW has a market cap of 173M. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while MVEC.SW trades at CHF 6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MVEC.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to MVEC.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is more volatile compared to MVEC.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs PEHN.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, PEHN.SW has a market cap of 171.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while PEHN.SW trades at CHF 70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PEHN.SW's P/E ratio is 19.02. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to PEHN.SW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is more volatile compared to PEHN.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs IJPC.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, IJPC.SW has a market cap of 156.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while IJPC.SW trades at CHF 94.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IJPC.SW's P/E ratio is 14.59. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to IJPC.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is less volatile compared to IJPC.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs GHYC.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, GHYC.SW has a market cap of 155.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while GHYC.SW trades at CHF 71.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GHYC.SW's P/E ratio is 10.66. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to GHYC.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is less volatile compared to GHYC.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs STUX.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, STUX.SW has a market cap of 155.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while STUX.SW trades at CHF 187.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STUX.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to STUX.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is more volatile compared to STUX.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs GAM.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, GAM.SW has a market cap of 109.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while GAM.SW trades at CHF 0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GAM.SW's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to GAM.SW's ROE of -0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is less volatile compared to GAM.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs EMUC.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, EMUC.SW has a market cap of 107.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while EMUC.SW trades at CHF 8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMUC.SW's P/E ratio is 16.83. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to EMUC.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is less volatile compared to EMUC.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs BBN.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, BBN.SW has a market cap of 99.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while BBN.SW trades at CHF 7.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBN.SW's P/E ratio is 10.90. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to BBN.SW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is less volatile compared to BBN.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs SPCE.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, SPCE.SW has a market cap of 80.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while SPCE.SW trades at CHF 16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPCE.SW's P/E ratio is 2.39. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to SPCE.SW's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is more volatile compared to SPCE.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs ZPAL.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, ZPAL.SW has a market cap of 80.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while ZPAL.SW trades at CHF 255.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZPAL.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to ZPAL.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is less volatile compared to ZPAL.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs ETHW.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, ETHW.SW has a market cap of 75.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while ETHW.SW trades at CHF 19.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ETHW.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to ETHW.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is less volatile compared to ETHW.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs SCWS.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, SCWS.SW has a market cap of 74.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while SCWS.SW trades at CHF 6.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCWS.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to SCWS.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is more volatile compared to SCWS.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs ALPN.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, ALPN.SW has a market cap of 64M. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while ALPN.SW trades at CHF 7.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALPN.SW's P/E ratio is 21.62. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to ALPN.SW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is more volatile compared to ALPN.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs AADA.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, AADA.SW has a market cap of 63.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while AADA.SW trades at CHF 10.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AADA.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to AADA.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is more volatile compared to AADA.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs IT25.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, IT25.SW has a market cap of 59.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while IT25.SW trades at CHF 107.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IT25.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to IT25.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is more volatile compared to IT25.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs NBEN.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, NBEN.SW has a market cap of 56.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while NBEN.SW trades at CHF 6.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NBEN.SW's P/E ratio is -10.69. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to NBEN.SW's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is more volatile compared to NBEN.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs LQDH.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, LQDH.SW has a market cap of 53.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while LQDH.SW trades at CHF 85.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LQDH.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to LQDH.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is more volatile compared to LQDH.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs EMDA.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, EMDA.SW has a market cap of 50.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while EMDA.SW trades at CHF 28.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMDA.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to EMDA.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is more volatile compared to EMDA.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs INGS.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, INGS.SW has a market cap of 49.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while INGS.SW trades at CHF 150.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INGS.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to INGS.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is less volatile compared to INGS.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs MVSH.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, MVSH.SW has a market cap of 48.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while MVSH.SW trades at CHF 7.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MVSH.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to MVSH.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is more volatile compared to MVSH.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs FOOD.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, FOOD.SW has a market cap of 47.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while FOOD.SW trades at CHF 122.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FOOD.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to FOOD.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is more volatile compared to FOOD.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs CPEN.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, CPEN.SW has a market cap of 30.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while CPEN.SW trades at CHF 3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPEN.SW's P/E ratio is -13.64. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to CPEN.SW's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is less volatile compared to CPEN.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs FIND.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, FIND.SW has a market cap of 26.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while FIND.SW trades at CHF 156.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FIND.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to FIND.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is less volatile compared to FIND.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs HODLX.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, HODLX.SW has a market cap of 19.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while HODLX.SW trades at CHF 27.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HODLX.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to HODLX.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is more volatile compared to HODLX.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs ADOT.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, ADOT.SW has a market cap of 19.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while ADOT.SW trades at CHF 1.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADOT.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to ADOT.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is more volatile compared to ADOT.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs IEUC.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, IEUC.SW has a market cap of 16.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while IEUC.SW trades at CHF 5.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IEUC.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to IEUC.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is more volatile compared to IEUC.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs RUS.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, RUS.SW has a market cap of 14.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while RUS.SW trades at CHF 5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RUS.SW's P/E ratio is 7.05. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to RUS.SW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is less volatile compared to RUS.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs ABNB.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, ABNB.SW has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while ABNB.SW trades at CHF 43.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABNB.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to ABNB.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is more volatile compared to ABNB.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs AVAX.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, AVAX.SW has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while AVAX.SW trades at CHF 3.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVAX.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to AVAX.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is more volatile compared to AVAX.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs SBTC.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, SBTC.SW has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while SBTC.SW trades at CHF 0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SBTC.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to SBTC.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is more volatile compared to SBTC.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs ABCH.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, ABCH.SW has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while ABCH.SW trades at CHF 16.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABCH.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to ABCH.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is more volatile compared to ABCH.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs DMFC.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, DMFC.SW has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while DMFC.SW trades at CHF 8.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DMFC.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to DMFC.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is more volatile compared to DMFC.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs ADAW.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, ADAW.SW has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while ADAW.SW trades at CHF 6.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADAW.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to ADAW.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is more volatile compared to ADAW.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs EEII.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, EEII.SW has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while EEII.SW trades at CHF 2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EEII.SW's P/E ratio is -7.27. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to EEII.SW's ROE of +3.63%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is less volatile compared to EEII.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs DOTW.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, DOTW.SW has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while DOTW.SW trades at CHF 2.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DOTW.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to DOTW.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is less volatile compared to DOTW.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs NEWN.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, NEWN.SW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while NEWN.SW trades at CHF 0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEWN.SW's P/E ratio is -21.86. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to NEWN.SW's ROE of -1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is more volatile compared to NEWN.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs AUTD.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, AUTD.SW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while AUTD.SW trades at CHF 101.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AUTD.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to AUTD.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is more volatile compared to AUTD.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs INSU.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, INSU.SW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while INSU.SW trades at CHF 73.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INSU.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to INSU.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is more volatile compared to INSU.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs TNOD.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, TNOD.SW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while TNOD.SW trades at CHF 123.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TNOD.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to TNOD.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is more volatile compared to TNOD.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs CASN.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, CASN.SW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while CASN.SW trades at CHF 1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CASN.SW's P/E ratio is 22.15. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to CASN.SW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is less volatile compared to CASN.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs FFI.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, FFI.SW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while FFI.SW trades at CHF 26.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FFI.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to FFI.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is more volatile compared to FFI.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs CSEMU.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, CSEMU.SW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while CSEMU.SW trades at CHF 157.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSEMU.SW's P/E ratio is 13.56. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to CSEMU.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is less volatile compared to CSEMU.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.
LYSPH.SW vs 0P00015M0N.SW Comparison
LYSPH.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYSPH.SW stands at 17B. In comparison, 0P00015M0N.SW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LYSPH.SW is priced at CHF 228.85, while 0P00015M0N.SW trades at CHF 128.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYSPH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00015M0N.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYSPH.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to 0P00015M0N.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LYSPH.SW is more volatile compared to 0P00015M0N.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYSPH.SW.