Lycaon Resources Limited
Lycaon Resources Limited LYN.AX Peers
See (LYN.AX) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Other Precious Metals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LYN.AX | $0.13 | N/A | 7.54M | -6.50 | -$0.02 | N/A |
| ZIM.AX | $10.40 | -0.29% | 1.12B | 33.55 | $0.31 | N/A |
| BRE.AX | $1.95 | +3.72% | 481.12M | -9.75 | -$0.20 | N/A |
| SMI.AX | $0.54 | +0.93% | 390.27M | -54.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| AZY.AX | $0.50 | +8.70% | 287.29M | -50.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| MI6.AX | $0.13 | N/A | 279.59M | -6.50 | -$0.02 | N/A |
| LRV.AX | $0.67 | +1.53% | 273.47M | -13.30 | -$0.05 | N/A |
| STK.AX | $0.12 | +4.55% | 260.17M | 11.50 | $0.01 | N/A |
| VAL.AX | $0.05 | +4.17% | 228.23M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 29M.AX | $0.17 | +3.13% | 226.27M | -0.69 | -$0.24 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
LYN.AX vs ZIM.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, ZIM.AX has a market cap of 1.12B. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while ZIM.AX trades at $10.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas ZIM.AX's P/E ratio is 33.55. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ZIM.AX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is less volatile compared to ZIM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs BRE.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, BRE.AX has a market cap of 481.12M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while BRE.AX trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas BRE.AX's P/E ratio is -9.75. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to BRE.AX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is less volatile compared to BRE.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs SMI.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, SMI.AX has a market cap of 390.27M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while SMI.AX trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas SMI.AX's P/E ratio is -54.00. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SMI.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is more volatile compared to SMI.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs AZY.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, AZY.AX has a market cap of 287.29M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while AZY.AX trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas AZY.AX's P/E ratio is -50.00. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to AZY.AX's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is less volatile compared to AZY.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs MI6.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, MI6.AX has a market cap of 279.59M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while MI6.AX trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas MI6.AX's P/E ratio is -6.50. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to MI6.AX's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is less volatile compared to MI6.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs LRV.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, LRV.AX has a market cap of 273.47M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while LRV.AX trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas LRV.AX's P/E ratio is -13.30. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LRV.AX's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is less volatile compared to LRV.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs STK.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, STK.AX has a market cap of 260.17M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while STK.AX trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas STK.AX's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to STK.AX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is less volatile compared to STK.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs VAL.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, VAL.AX has a market cap of 228.23M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while VAL.AX trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas VAL.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to VAL.AX's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is less volatile compared to VAL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs 29M.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, 29M.AX has a market cap of 226.27M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while 29M.AX trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas 29M.AX's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to 29M.AX's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is less volatile compared to 29M.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs A1M.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, A1M.AX has a market cap of 198.61M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while A1M.AX trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas A1M.AX's P/E ratio is 17.25. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to A1M.AX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is more volatile compared to A1M.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs TOK.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, TOK.AX has a market cap of 162.79M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while TOK.AX trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas TOK.AX's P/E ratio is -16.20. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to TOK.AX's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is less volatile compared to TOK.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs MM8.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, MM8.AX has a market cap of 131.66M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while MM8.AX trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas MM8.AX's P/E ratio is -27.50. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to MM8.AX's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is less volatile compared to MM8.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs CEL.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, CEL.AX has a market cap of 128.48M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while CEL.AX trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas CEL.AX's P/E ratio is 1.52. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CEL.AX's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is less volatile compared to CEL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs BOC.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, BOC.AX has a market cap of 128.34M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while BOC.AX trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas BOC.AX's P/E ratio is -32.00. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to BOC.AX's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is less volatile compared to BOC.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs MTM.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, MTM.AX has a market cap of 112.38M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while MTM.AX trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas MTM.AX's P/E ratio is -12.25. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to MTM.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is less volatile compared to MTM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs PTR.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, PTR.AX has a market cap of 98.50M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while PTR.AX trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas PTR.AX's P/E ratio is -28.50. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to PTR.AX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is less volatile compared to PTR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs XAM.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, XAM.AX has a market cap of 97.52M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while XAM.AX trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas XAM.AX's P/E ratio is -5.10. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to XAM.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is less volatile compared to XAM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs NWF.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, NWF.AX has a market cap of 83.72M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while NWF.AX trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas NWF.AX's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to NWF.AX's ROE of -3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is less volatile compared to NWF.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs CNB.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, CNB.AX has a market cap of 70.80M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while CNB.AX trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas CNB.AX's P/E ratio is -7.75. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CNB.AX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is less volatile compared to CNB.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs RIM.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, RIM.AX has a market cap of 52.88M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while RIM.AX trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas RIM.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to RIM.AX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is less volatile compared to RIM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs FEG.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, FEG.AX has a market cap of 51.38M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while FEG.AX trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas FEG.AX's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to FEG.AX's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is less volatile compared to FEG.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs IDA.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, IDA.AX has a market cap of 50.78M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while IDA.AX trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas IDA.AX's P/E ratio is 0.99. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to IDA.AX's ROE of +2.90%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is less volatile compared to IDA.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs BDM.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, BDM.AX has a market cap of 48.33M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while BDM.AX trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas BDM.AX's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to BDM.AX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is more volatile compared to BDM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs MMA.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, MMA.AX has a market cap of 47.29M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while MMA.AX trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas MMA.AX's P/E ratio is -5.87. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to MMA.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is less volatile compared to MMA.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs PUA.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, PUA.AX has a market cap of 44.92M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while PUA.AX trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas PUA.AX's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to PUA.AX's ROE of +76.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is less volatile compared to PUA.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs OSM.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, OSM.AX has a market cap of 41.13M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while OSM.AX trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas OSM.AX's P/E ratio is -3.91. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to OSM.AX's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is more volatile compared to OSM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs AGD.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, AGD.AX has a market cap of 38.58M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while AGD.AX trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas AGD.AX's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to AGD.AX's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is more volatile compared to AGD.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs E2M.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, E2M.AX has a market cap of 34.91M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while E2M.AX trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas E2M.AX's P/E ratio is -2.33. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to E2M.AX's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is less volatile compared to E2M.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs MXR.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, MXR.AX has a market cap of 33.42M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while MXR.AX trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas MXR.AX's P/E ratio is -7.70. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to MXR.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is less volatile compared to MXR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs CAE.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, CAE.AX has a market cap of 32.04M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while CAE.AX trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas CAE.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CAE.AX's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is less volatile compared to CAE.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs TLM.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, TLM.AX has a market cap of 29.19M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while TLM.AX trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas TLM.AX's P/E ratio is -15.50. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to TLM.AX's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is more volatile compared to TLM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs HMX.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, HMX.AX has a market cap of 28.41M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while HMX.AX trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas HMX.AX's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to HMX.AX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is less volatile compared to HMX.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs BMR.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, BMR.AX has a market cap of 28.28M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while BMR.AX trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas BMR.AX's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to BMR.AX's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is less volatile compared to BMR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs MKR.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, MKR.AX has a market cap of 25.13M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while MKR.AX trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas MKR.AX's P/E ratio is -1.55. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to MKR.AX's ROE of -1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is less volatile compared to MKR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs PNX.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, PNX.AX has a market cap of 23.88M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while PNX.AX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas PNX.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to PNX.AX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is more volatile compared to PNX.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs FTL.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, FTL.AX has a market cap of 22.80M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while FTL.AX trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas FTL.AX's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to FTL.AX's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is less volatile compared to FTL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs GSN.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, GSN.AX has a market cap of 21.93M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while GSN.AX trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas GSN.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to GSN.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is less volatile compared to GSN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs LDR.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, LDR.AX has a market cap of 21.03M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while LDR.AX trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas LDR.AX's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LDR.AX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is less volatile compared to LDR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs SPD.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, SPD.AX has a market cap of 20.46M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while SPD.AX trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas SPD.AX's P/E ratio is -2.81. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SPD.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is more volatile compared to SPD.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs MM1.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, MM1.AX has a market cap of 19.49M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while MM1.AX trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas MM1.AX's P/E ratio is -3.92. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to MM1.AX's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is less volatile compared to MM1.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs FRS.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, FRS.AX has a market cap of 18.60M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while FRS.AX trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas FRS.AX's P/E ratio is -3.10. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to FRS.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is less volatile compared to FRS.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs BRX.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, BRX.AX has a market cap of 18.00M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while BRX.AX trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas BRX.AX's P/E ratio is -3.83. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to BRX.AX's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is less volatile compared to BRX.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs G50.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, G50.AX has a market cap of 17.67M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while G50.AX trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas G50.AX's P/E ratio is -11.00. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to G50.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is more volatile compared to G50.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs QML.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, QML.AX has a market cap of 15.87M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while QML.AX trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas QML.AX's P/E ratio is -3.70. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to QML.AX's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is more volatile compared to QML.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs RDN.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, RDN.AX has a market cap of 13.80M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while RDN.AX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas RDN.AX's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to RDN.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is less volatile compared to RDN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs PGM.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, PGM.AX has a market cap of 12.46M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while PGM.AX trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas PGM.AX's P/E ratio is 1.00. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to PGM.AX's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is less volatile compared to PGM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs COY.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, COY.AX has a market cap of 11.47M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while COY.AX trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas COY.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to COY.AX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is more volatile compared to COY.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs LCL.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, LCL.AX has a market cap of 9.56M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while LCL.AX trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas LCL.AX's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LCL.AX's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is less volatile compared to LCL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs SCN.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, SCN.AX has a market cap of 9.43M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while SCN.AX trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas SCN.AX's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SCN.AX's ROE of -1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is less volatile compared to SCN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs ALV.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, ALV.AX has a market cap of 8.96M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while ALV.AX trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas ALV.AX's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ALV.AX's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is less volatile compared to ALV.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs OMX.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, OMX.AX has a market cap of 8.85M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while OMX.AX trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas OMX.AX's P/E ratio is -7.10. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to OMX.AX's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is less volatile compared to OMX.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs MPG.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, MPG.AX has a market cap of 8.78M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while MPG.AX trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas MPG.AX's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to MPG.AX's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is more volatile compared to MPG.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs FME.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, FME.AX has a market cap of 8.63M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while FME.AX trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas FME.AX's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to FME.AX's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is more volatile compared to FME.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs RON.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, RON.AX has a market cap of 8.08M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while RON.AX trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas RON.AX's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to RON.AX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is less volatile compared to RON.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs ODE.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, ODE.AX has a market cap of 8.00M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while ODE.AX trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas ODE.AX's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ODE.AX's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is more volatile compared to ODE.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs PRS.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, PRS.AX has a market cap of 7.89M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while PRS.AX trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas PRS.AX's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to PRS.AX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is less volatile compared to PRS.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs ERL.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, ERL.AX has a market cap of 7.42M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while ERL.AX trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas ERL.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ERL.AX's ROE of -2.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is less volatile compared to ERL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs C1X.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, C1X.AX has a market cap of 7.24M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while C1X.AX trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas C1X.AX's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to C1X.AX's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is more volatile compared to C1X.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs T88.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, T88.AX has a market cap of 7.07M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while T88.AX trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas T88.AX's P/E ratio is -3.17. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to T88.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is more volatile compared to T88.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs KOB.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, KOB.AX has a market cap of 6.66M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while KOB.AX trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas KOB.AX's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to KOB.AX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is less volatile compared to KOB.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs LOM.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, LOM.AX has a market cap of 6.45M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while LOM.AX trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas LOM.AX's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LOM.AX's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is less volatile compared to LOM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs GIB.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, GIB.AX has a market cap of 6.44M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while GIB.AX trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas GIB.AX's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to GIB.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is less volatile compared to GIB.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs TAR.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, TAR.AX has a market cap of 6.35M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while TAR.AX trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas TAR.AX's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to TAR.AX's ROE of -4.64%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is less volatile compared to TAR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs HAR.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, HAR.AX has a market cap of 6.05M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while HAR.AX trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas HAR.AX's P/E ratio is -1.77. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to HAR.AX's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is less volatile compared to HAR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs NFL.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, NFL.AX has a market cap of 5.93M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while NFL.AX trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas NFL.AX's P/E ratio is -7.25. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to NFL.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is more volatile compared to NFL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs RB6.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, RB6.AX has a market cap of 5.71M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while RB6.AX trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas RB6.AX's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to RB6.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is more volatile compared to RB6.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs MHC.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, MHC.AX has a market cap of 5.17M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while MHC.AX trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas MHC.AX's P/E ratio is -2.20. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to MHC.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is less volatile compared to MHC.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs LKY.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, LKY.AX has a market cap of 5.13M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while LKY.AX trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas LKY.AX's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LKY.AX's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is less volatile compared to LKY.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs MOH.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, MOH.AX has a market cap of 5.12M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while MOH.AX trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas MOH.AX's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to MOH.AX's ROE of -2.59%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is less volatile compared to MOH.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs HWK.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, HWK.AX has a market cap of 4.88M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while HWK.AX trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas HWK.AX's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to HWK.AX's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is less volatile compared to HWK.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs BIM.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, BIM.AX has a market cap of 4.72M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while BIM.AX trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas BIM.AX's P/E ratio is -2.70. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to BIM.AX's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is more volatile compared to BIM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs GRL.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, GRL.AX has a market cap of 4.04M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while GRL.AX trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas GRL.AX's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to GRL.AX's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is less volatile compared to GRL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs PNT.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, PNT.AX has a market cap of 3.91M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while PNT.AX trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas PNT.AX's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to PNT.AX's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is less volatile compared to PNT.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs CBY.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, CBY.AX has a market cap of 3.85M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while CBY.AX trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas CBY.AX's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CBY.AX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is less volatile compared to CBY.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs RCR.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, RCR.AX has a market cap of 3.80M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while RCR.AX trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas RCR.AX's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to RCR.AX's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is more volatile compared to RCR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs TG1.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, TG1.AX has a market cap of 3.65M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while TG1.AX trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas TG1.AX's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to TG1.AX's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is less volatile compared to TG1.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs CBH.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, CBH.AX has a market cap of 3.13M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while CBH.AX trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas CBH.AX's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CBH.AX's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is more volatile compared to CBH.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs PKO.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, PKO.AX has a market cap of 2.98M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while PKO.AX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas PKO.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to PKO.AX's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is more volatile compared to PKO.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs AS2.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, AS2.AX has a market cap of 2.80M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while AS2.AX trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas AS2.AX's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to AS2.AX's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is less volatile compared to AS2.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs CUS.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, CUS.AX has a market cap of 2.73M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while CUS.AX trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas CUS.AX's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CUS.AX's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is less volatile compared to CUS.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs BMO.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, BMO.AX has a market cap of 2.71M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while BMO.AX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas BMO.AX's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to BMO.AX's ROE of -1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is more volatile compared to BMO.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs KFM.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, KFM.AX has a market cap of 2.69M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while KFM.AX trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas KFM.AX's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to KFM.AX's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is less volatile compared to KFM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs M3M.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, M3M.AX has a market cap of 2.51M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while M3M.AX trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas M3M.AX's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to M3M.AX's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is more volatile compared to M3M.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs BPM.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, BPM.AX has a market cap of 2.44M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while BPM.AX trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas BPM.AX's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to BPM.AX's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is more volatile compared to BPM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs DUN.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, DUN.AX has a market cap of 2.36M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while DUN.AX trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas DUN.AX's P/E ratio is -2.20. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to DUN.AX's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is more volatile compared to DUN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs OCT.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, OCT.AX has a market cap of 2.20M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while OCT.AX trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas OCT.AX's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to OCT.AX's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is less volatile compared to OCT.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs GCR.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, GCR.AX has a market cap of 2.19M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while GCR.AX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas GCR.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to GCR.AX's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is more volatile compared to GCR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs AVW.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, AVW.AX has a market cap of 1.46M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while AVW.AX trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas AVW.AX's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to AVW.AX's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is less volatile compared to AVW.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.
LYN.AX vs EMS.AX Comparison
LYN.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYN.AX stands at 7.54M. In comparison, EMS.AX has a market cap of 1.39M. Regarding current trading prices, LYN.AX is priced at $0.13, while EMS.AX trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYN.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas EMS.AX's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, LYN.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to EMS.AX's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, LYN.AX is more volatile compared to EMS.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYN.AX.