Lyric Jeans, Inc.
Lyric Jeans, Inc. LYJN Peers
See (LYJN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Manufacturers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LYJN | $0.00 | N/A | 9.9K | -0.01 | -$0.00 | N/A |
| HNNMY | $2.80 | -2.10% | 115.3B | 20.00 | $0.14 | +0.49% |
| HMRZF | $15.50 | N/A | 25B | 21.83 | $0.71 | +4.20% |
| MONRF | $65.00 | N/A | 17.6B | 24.25 | $2.68 | +1.99% |
| MONRY | $61.69 | -0.95% | 16.7B | 23.02 | $2.68 | +2.11% |
| SZHIF | $7.65 | N/A | 11.5B | 15.61 | $0.49 | +3.90% |
| TRYIF | $7.02 | N/A | 11B | 20.65 | $0.34 | +1.74% |
| SHZHY | $7.23 | +0.07% | 10.9B | 18.06 | $0.40 | +4.17% |
| TRYIY | $13.82 | -2.33% | 10.8B | 20.32 | $0.68 | +0.52% |
| BSDGY | $30.00 | N/A | 6.9B | 14.78 | $2.03 | +5.56% |
Stock Comparison
LYJN vs HNNMY Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 9.9K. In comparison, HNNMY has a market cap of 115.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while HNNMY trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HNNMY's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to HNNMY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is more volatile compared to HNNMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs HMRZF Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 9.9K. In comparison, HMRZF has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while HMRZF trades at $15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HMRZF's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to HMRZF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is more volatile compared to HMRZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs MONRF Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 9.9K. In comparison, MONRF has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while MONRF trades at $65.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MONRF's P/E ratio is 24.25. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to MONRF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is more volatile compared to MONRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs MONRY Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 9.9K. In comparison, MONRY has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while MONRY trades at $61.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MONRY's P/E ratio is 23.02. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to MONRY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is more volatile compared to MONRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs SZHIF Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 9.9K. In comparison, SZHIF has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while SZHIF trades at $7.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SZHIF's P/E ratio is 15.61. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to SZHIF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is more volatile compared to SZHIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs TRYIF Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 9.9K. In comparison, TRYIF has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while TRYIF trades at $7.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TRYIF's P/E ratio is 20.65. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to TRYIF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is more volatile compared to TRYIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs SHZHY Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 9.9K. In comparison, SHZHY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while SHZHY trades at $7.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SHZHY's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to SHZHY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is more volatile compared to SHZHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs TRYIY Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 9.9K. In comparison, TRYIY has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while TRYIY trades at $13.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TRYIY's P/E ratio is 20.32. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to TRYIY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is more volatile compared to TRYIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs BSDGY Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 9.9K. In comparison, BSDGY has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while BSDGY trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BSDGY's P/E ratio is 14.78. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to BSDGY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is more volatile compared to BSDGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs BSDGF Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 9.9K. In comparison, BSDGF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while BSDGF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BSDGF's P/E ratio is 13.70. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to BSDGF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is more volatile compared to BSDGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs RYPPF Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 9.9K. In comparison, RYPPF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while RYPPF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas RYPPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to RYPPF's ROE of +1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is less volatile compared to RYPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs BOSSY Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 9.9K. In comparison, BOSSY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while BOSSY trades at $8.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BOSSY's P/E ratio is 12.79. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to BOSSY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is more volatile compared to BOSSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs WACLY Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 9.9K. In comparison, WACLY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while WACLY trades at $170.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas WACLY's P/E ratio is 38.04. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to WACLY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is more volatile compared to WACLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs CGGGF Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 9.9K. In comparison, CGGGF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while CGGGF trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CGGGF's P/E ratio is 21.50. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to CGGGF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is more volatile compared to CGGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs DELTF Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 9.9K. In comparison, DELTF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while DELTF trades at $47.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas DELTF's P/E ratio is 13.45. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to DELTF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is more volatile compared to DELTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs JNBYF Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 9.9K. In comparison, JNBYF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while JNBYF trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas JNBYF's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to JNBYF's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is more volatile compared to JNBYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs SERNF Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 9.9K. In comparison, SERNF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while SERNF trades at $17.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SERNF's P/E ratio is 10.73. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to SERNF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is more volatile compared to SERNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs WACLF Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 9.9K. In comparison, WACLF has a market cap of 780.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while WACLF trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas WACLF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to WACLF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is more volatile compared to WACLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs MKKOF Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 9.9K. In comparison, MKKOF has a market cap of 525.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while MKKOF trades at $12.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MKKOF's P/E ratio is 19.64. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to MKKOF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is more volatile compared to MKKOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs JWTXF Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 9.9K. In comparison, JWTXF has a market cap of 517.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while JWTXF trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas JWTXF's P/E ratio is 0.11. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to JWTXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is more volatile compared to JWTXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs TSIHF Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 9.9K. In comparison, TSIHF has a market cap of 473M. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while TSIHF trades at $7.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TSIHF's P/E ratio is 4.83. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to TSIHF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is more volatile compared to TSIHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs VDEVF Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 9.9K. In comparison, VDEVF has a market cap of 441.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while VDEVF trades at $35.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas VDEVF's P/E ratio is 12.65. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to VDEVF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is more volatile compared to VDEVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs CDGXF Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 9.9K. In comparison, CDGXF has a market cap of 351.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while CDGXF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CDGXF's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to CDGXF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is more volatile compared to CDGXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs CDGXY Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 9.9K. In comparison, CDGXY has a market cap of 235.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while CDGXY trades at $2.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CDGXY's P/E ratio is -18.27. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to CDGXY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is more volatile compared to CDGXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs WQTEF Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 9.9K. In comparison, WQTEF has a market cap of 167.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while WQTEF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas WQTEF's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to WQTEF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is more volatile compared to WQTEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs ECNLF Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 9.9K. In comparison, ECNLF has a market cap of 112.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while ECNLF trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ECNLF's P/E ratio is -6.19. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to ECNLF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is more volatile compared to ECNLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs CHRLF Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 9.9K. In comparison, CHRLF has a market cap of 84.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while CHRLF trades at $5.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CHRLF's P/E ratio is 8.17. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to CHRLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is more volatile compared to CHRLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs TFRFF Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 9.9K. In comparison, TFRFF has a market cap of 82.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while TFRFF trades at $6.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TFRFF's P/E ratio is 5.72. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to TFRFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is more volatile compared to TFRFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs NLLGF Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 9.9K. In comparison, NLLGF has a market cap of 67M. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while NLLGF trades at $5.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NLLGF's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to NLLGF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is more volatile compared to NLLGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs TAPCF Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 9.9K. In comparison, TAPCF has a market cap of 42.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while TAPCF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TAPCF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to TAPCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is more volatile compared to TAPCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs LPPSY Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 9.9K. In comparison, LPPSY has a market cap of 37.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while LPPSY trades at $20.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas LPPSY's P/E ratio is 18.23. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to LPPSY's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is more volatile compared to LPPSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs IFABF Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 9.9K. In comparison, IFABF has a market cap of 23.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while IFABF trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas IFABF's P/E ratio is 25.69. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to IFABF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is more volatile compared to IFABF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs USYNF Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 9.9K. In comparison, USYNF has a market cap of 16.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while USYNF trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas USYNF's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to USYNF's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is more volatile compared to USYNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs TUGHF Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 9.9K. In comparison, TUGHF has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while TUGHF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TUGHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to TUGHF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is more volatile compared to TUGHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs SEPGY Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 9.9K. In comparison, SEPGY has a market cap of 8.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while SEPGY trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SEPGY's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to SEPGY's ROE of -6.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is more volatile compared to SEPGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs SEPGF Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 9.9K. In comparison, SEPGF has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while SEPGF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SEPGF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to SEPGF's ROE of -4.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is more volatile compared to SEPGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs AVLP Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 9.9K. In comparison, AVLP has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while AVLP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AVLP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to AVLP's ROE of +2.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is more volatile compared to AVLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs TALN Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 9.9K. In comparison, TALN has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while TALN trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TALN's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to TALN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is more volatile compared to TALN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs AHRO Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 9.9K. In comparison, AHRO has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while AHRO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AHRO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to AHRO's ROE of +1.68%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is more volatile compared to AHRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs CRTL Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 9.9K. In comparison, CRTL has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while CRTL trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CRTL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to CRTL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is more volatile compared to CRTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs JLMC Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 9.9K. In comparison, JLMC has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while JLMC trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas JLMC's P/E ratio is 23.75. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to JLMC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is more volatile compared to JLMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs CGAC Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 9.9K. In comparison, CGAC has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while CGAC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CGAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to CGAC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is more volatile compared to CGAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs PBBSF Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 9.9K. In comparison, PBBSF has a market cap of 907.8K. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while PBBSF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PBBSF's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to PBBSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is more volatile compared to PBBSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs BLFR Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 9.9K. In comparison, BLFR has a market cap of 719.7K. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while BLFR trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BLFR's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to BLFR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is more volatile compared to BLFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs SKFG Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 9.9K. In comparison, SKFG has a market cap of 517.3K. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while SKFG trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SKFG's P/E ratio is -5.20. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to SKFG's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is more volatile compared to SKFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs SUUB Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 9.9K. In comparison, SUUB has a market cap of 81.2K. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while SUUB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SUUB's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to SUUB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is less volatile compared to SUUB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs AGNY Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 9.9K. In comparison, AGNY has a market cap of 72K. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while AGNY trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AGNY's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to AGNY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is more volatile compared to AGNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs CIND Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 9.9K. In comparison, CIND has a market cap of 57.6K. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while CIND trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CIND's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to CIND's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is less volatile compared to CIND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs OMVE Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 9.9K. In comparison, OMVE has a market cap of 15.5K. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while OMVE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas OMVE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to OMVE's ROE of +7.54%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is less volatile compared to OMVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs TRUA Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 9.9K. In comparison, TRUA has a market cap of 6.9K. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while TRUA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TRUA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to TRUA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is less volatile compared to TRUA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs EDSFF Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 9.9K. In comparison, EDSFF has a market cap of 3.3K. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while EDSFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas EDSFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to EDSFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is less volatile compared to EDSFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs APPM Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 9.9K. In comparison, APPM has a market cap of 2.8K. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while APPM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas APPM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to APPM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is less volatile compared to APPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs IBGR Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 9.9K. In comparison, IBGR has a market cap of 1.6K. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while IBGR trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas IBGR's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to IBGR's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is more volatile compared to IBGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs LZENF Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 9.9K. In comparison, LZENF has a market cap of 1.4K. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while LZENF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas LZENF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to LZENF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is more volatile compared to LZENF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs SSTU Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 9.9K. In comparison, SSTU has a market cap of 897. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while SSTU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SSTU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to SSTU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is less volatile compared to SSTU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs SUFF Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 9.9K. In comparison, SUFF has a market cap of 69. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while SUFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SUFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to SUFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is more volatile compared to SUFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs GLLHF Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 9.9K. In comparison, GLLHF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while GLLHF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GLLHF's P/E ratio is 12.25. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to GLLHF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is more volatile compared to GLLHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs WLFDY Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 9.9K. In comparison, WLFDY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while WLFDY trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas WLFDY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to WLFDY's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is more volatile compared to WLFDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs JKRO Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 9.9K. In comparison, JKRO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while JKRO trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas JKRO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to JKRO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is more volatile compared to JKRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.