Lyric Jeans, Inc.
Lyric Jeans, Inc. LYJN Peers
See (LYJN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Manufacturers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LYJN | $0.00 | +1900.00% | 990 | -0.20 | -$0.00 | N/A |
| HNNMY | $2.65 | -0.75% | 106.7B | 18.93 | $0.14 | +0.51% |
| HMRZF | $13.54 | -3.70% | 21.8B | 20.52 | $0.66 | +4.81% |
| MONRF | $60.90 | -0.39% | 16.5B | 22.47 | $2.71 | +2.09% |
| MONRY | $57.83 | -1.17% | 15.7B | 21.34 | $2.71 | +2.22% |
| SZHIF | $7.65 | N/A | 11.5B | 15.61 | $0.49 | +4.25% |
| TRYIY | $13.50 | +0.67% | 10.6B | 19.85 | $0.68 | +0.53% |
| TRYIF | $6.66 | -5.13% | 10.4B | 19.59 | $0.34 | +1.83% |
| SHZHY | $6.71 | +0.60% | 10.1B | 16.77 | $0.40 | +4.84% |
| LPPSY | $20.24 | -0.83% | 7.5B | 18.23 | $1.11 | +4.13% |
Stock Comparison
LYJN vs HNNMY Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 990. In comparison, HNNMY has a market cap of 106.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while HNNMY trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas HNNMY's P/E ratio is 18.93. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to HNNMY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is less volatile compared to HNNMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs HMRZF Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 990. In comparison, HMRZF has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while HMRZF trades at $13.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas HMRZF's P/E ratio is 20.52. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to HMRZF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN and HMRZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LYJN vs MONRF Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 990. In comparison, MONRF has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while MONRF trades at $60.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas MONRF's P/E ratio is 22.47. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to MONRF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is less volatile compared to MONRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs MONRY Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 990. In comparison, MONRY has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while MONRY trades at $57.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas MONRY's P/E ratio is 21.34. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to MONRY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is less volatile compared to MONRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs SZHIF Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 990. In comparison, SZHIF has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while SZHIF trades at $7.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas SZHIF's P/E ratio is 15.61. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to SZHIF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN and SZHIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LYJN vs TRYIY Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 990. In comparison, TRYIY has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while TRYIY trades at $13.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas TRYIY's P/E ratio is 19.85. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to TRYIY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is less volatile compared to TRYIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs TRYIF Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 990. In comparison, TRYIF has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while TRYIF trades at $6.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas TRYIF's P/E ratio is 19.59. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to TRYIF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN and TRYIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LYJN vs SHZHY Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 990. In comparison, SHZHY has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while SHZHY trades at $6.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas SHZHY's P/E ratio is 16.77. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to SHZHY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is less volatile compared to SHZHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs LPPSY Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 990. In comparison, LPPSY has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while LPPSY trades at $20.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas LPPSY's P/E ratio is 18.23. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to LPPSY's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is less volatile compared to LPPSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs BSDGF Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 990. In comparison, BSDGF has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while BSDGF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas BSDGF's P/E ratio is 14.84. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to BSDGF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN and BSDGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LYJN vs BSDGY Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 990. In comparison, BSDGY has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while BSDGY trades at $28.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas BSDGY's P/E ratio is 13.97. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to BSDGY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN and BSDGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LYJN vs RYPPF Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 990. In comparison, RYPPF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while RYPPF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas RYPPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to RYPPF's ROE of +1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is less volatile compared to RYPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs BOSSY Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 990. In comparison, BOSSY has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while BOSSY trades at $9.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas BOSSY's P/E ratio is 13.14. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to BOSSY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN and BOSSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LYJN vs CGGGF Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 990. In comparison, CGGGF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while CGGGF trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas CGGGF's P/E ratio is 22.60. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to CGGGF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN and CGGGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LYJN vs WACLY Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 990. In comparison, WACLY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while WACLY trades at $157.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas WACLY's P/E ratio is 35.29. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to WACLY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN and WACLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LYJN vs DELTF Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 990. In comparison, DELTF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while DELTF trades at $47.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas DELTF's P/E ratio is 13.45. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to DELTF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN and DELTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LYJN vs WACLF Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 990. In comparison, WACLF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while WACLF trades at $22.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas WACLF's P/E ratio is 38.28. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to WACLF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN and WACLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LYJN vs JNBYF Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 990. In comparison, JNBYF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while JNBYF trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas JNBYF's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to JNBYF's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN and JNBYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LYJN vs SERNF Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 990. In comparison, SERNF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while SERNF trades at $17.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas SERNF's P/E ratio is 10.73. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to SERNF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is less volatile compared to SERNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs JWTXF Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 990. In comparison, JWTXF has a market cap of 662M. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while JWTXF trades at $9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas JWTXF's P/E ratio is 0.13. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to JWTXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is less volatile compared to JWTXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs MKKOF Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 990. In comparison, MKKOF has a market cap of 527.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while MKKOF trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas MKKOF's P/E ratio is 19.40. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to MKKOF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN and MKKOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LYJN vs TSIHF Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 990. In comparison, TSIHF has a market cap of 466.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while TSIHF trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas TSIHF's P/E ratio is 4.79. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to TSIHF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is less volatile compared to TSIHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs VDEVF Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 990. In comparison, VDEVF has a market cap of 431M. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while VDEVF trades at $34.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas VDEVF's P/E ratio is 12.34. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to VDEVF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is less volatile compared to VDEVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs CDGXY Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 990. In comparison, CDGXY has a market cap of 308.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while CDGXY trades at $2.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas CDGXY's P/E ratio is -23.91. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to CDGXY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is less volatile compared to CDGXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs WQTEF Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 990. In comparison, WQTEF has a market cap of 167.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while WQTEF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas WQTEF's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to WQTEF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is less volatile compared to WQTEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs CDGXF Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 990. In comparison, CDGXF has a market cap of 147.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while CDGXF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas CDGXF's P/E ratio is -1.26. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to CDGXF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN and CDGXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LYJN vs ECNLF Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 990. In comparison, ECNLF has a market cap of 131.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while ECNLF trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas ECNLF's P/E ratio is -6.91. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to ECNLF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is less volatile compared to ECNLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs CHRLF Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 990. In comparison, CHRLF has a market cap of 84.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while CHRLF trades at $5.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas CHRLF's P/E ratio is 8.17. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to CHRLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN and CHRLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LYJN vs TFRFF Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 990. In comparison, TFRFF has a market cap of 82.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while TFRFF trades at $6.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas TFRFF's P/E ratio is 6.87. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to TFRFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN and TFRFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LYJN vs NLLGF Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 990. In comparison, NLLGF has a market cap of 67M. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while NLLGF trades at $5.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas NLLGF's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to NLLGF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN and NLLGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LYJN vs TAPCF Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 990. In comparison, TAPCF has a market cap of 42.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while TAPCF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas TAPCF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to TAPCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN and TAPCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LYJN vs IFABF Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 990. In comparison, IFABF has a market cap of 21.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while IFABF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas IFABF's P/E ratio is 23.33. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to IFABF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is less volatile compared to IFABF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs USYNF Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 990. In comparison, USYNF has a market cap of 16.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while USYNF trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas USYNF's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to USYNF's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN and USYNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LYJN vs TUGHF Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 990. In comparison, TUGHF has a market cap of 11.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while TUGHF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas TUGHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to TUGHF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN and TUGHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LYJN vs SEPGY Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 990. In comparison, SEPGY has a market cap of 8.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while SEPGY trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas SEPGY's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to SEPGY's ROE of -6.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN and SEPGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LYJN vs SEPGF Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 990. In comparison, SEPGF has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while SEPGF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas SEPGF's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to SEPGF's ROE of -4.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is less volatile compared to SEPGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs AVLP Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 990. In comparison, AVLP has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while AVLP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas AVLP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to AVLP's ROE of +2.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN and AVLP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LYJN vs TALN Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 990. In comparison, TALN has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while TALN trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas TALN's P/E ratio is 2.25. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to TALN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is less volatile compared to TALN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs AHRO Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 990. In comparison, AHRO has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while AHRO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas AHRO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to AHRO's ROE of +1.68%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is less volatile compared to AHRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs CRTL Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 990. In comparison, CRTL has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while CRTL trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas CRTL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to CRTL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN and CRTL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LYJN vs JLMC Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 990. In comparison, JLMC has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while JLMC trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas JLMC's P/E ratio is 23.75. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to JLMC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN and JLMC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LYJN vs SSTU Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 990. In comparison, SSTU has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while SSTU trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas SSTU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to SSTU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is less volatile compared to SSTU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs BLFR Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 990. In comparison, BLFR has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while BLFR trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas BLFR's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to BLFR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN and BLFR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LYJN vs PBBSF Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 990. In comparison, PBBSF has a market cap of 907.8K. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while PBBSF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas PBBSF's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to PBBSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN and PBBSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LYJN vs CGAC Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 990. In comparison, CGAC has a market cap of 743.6K. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while CGAC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas CGAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to CGAC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is less volatile compared to CGAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs SKFG Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 990. In comparison, SKFG has a market cap of 499.4K. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while SKFG trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas SKFG's P/E ratio is -5.02. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to SKFG's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is less volatile compared to SKFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs TRUA Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 990. In comparison, TRUA has a market cap of 117.2K. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while TRUA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas TRUA's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to TRUA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is less volatile compared to TRUA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs SUUB Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 990. In comparison, SUUB has a market cap of 81.2K. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while SUUB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas SUUB's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to SUUB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is less volatile compared to SUUB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs AGNY Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 990. In comparison, AGNY has a market cap of 72K. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while AGNY trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas AGNY's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to AGNY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN and AGNY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LYJN vs CIND Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 990. In comparison, CIND has a market cap of 57.6K. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while CIND trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas CIND's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to CIND's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is less volatile compared to CIND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs APPM Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 990. In comparison, APPM has a market cap of 41.3K. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while APPM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas APPM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to APPM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is less volatile compared to APPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs OMVE Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 990. In comparison, OMVE has a market cap of 15.5K. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while OMVE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas OMVE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to OMVE's ROE of +7.54%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is less volatile compared to OMVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs LZENF Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 990. In comparison, LZENF has a market cap of 13.6K. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while LZENF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas LZENF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to LZENF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is less volatile compared to LZENF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs EDSFF Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 990. In comparison, EDSFF has a market cap of 3.3K. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while EDSFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas EDSFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to EDSFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is less volatile compared to EDSFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs IBGR Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 990. In comparison, IBGR has a market cap of 2K. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while IBGR trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas IBGR's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to IBGR's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN is less volatile compared to IBGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYJN.
LYJN vs SUFF Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 990. In comparison, SUFF has a market cap of 69. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while SUFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas SUFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to SUFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN and SUFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LYJN vs GLLHF Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 990. In comparison, GLLHF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while GLLHF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas GLLHF's P/E ratio is 12.25. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to GLLHF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN and GLLHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LYJN vs WLFDY Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 990. In comparison, WLFDY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while WLFDY trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas WLFDY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to WLFDY's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN and WLFDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LYJN vs JKRO Comparison
LYJN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYJN stands at 990. In comparison, JKRO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LYJN is priced at $0.00, while JKRO trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYJN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas JKRO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYJN's ROE is N/A, compared to JKRO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LYJN and JKRO have similar daily volatility (0.00).