LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne

LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 278.04B. In comparison, HESAY has a market cap of 296.44B. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $557.00, while HESAY trades at $282.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.59, whereas HESAY's P/E ratio is 57.01. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HESAY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is less volatile compared to HESAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.

LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 278.04B. In comparison, HESAF has a market cap of 292.50B. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $557.00, while HESAF trades at $2,790.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.59, whereas HESAF's P/E ratio is 56.06. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HESAF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is more volatile compared to HESAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.

LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 278.04B. In comparison, LVMUY has a market cap of 277.29B. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $557.00, while LVMUY trades at $111.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.59, whereas LVMUY's P/E ratio is 19.53. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LVMUY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is more volatile compared to LVMUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.

LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 278.04B. In comparison, CFRHF has a market cap of 103.86B. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $557.00, while CFRHF trades at $177.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.59, whereas CFRHF's P/E ratio is 27.01. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CFRHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is more volatile compared to CFRHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.

LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 278.04B. In comparison, CFRUY has a market cap of 103.14B. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $557.00, while CFRUY trades at $17.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.59, whereas CFRUY's P/E ratio is 26.76. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CFRUY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is more volatile compared to CFRUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.

LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 278.04B. In comparison, CHDRY has a market cap of 95.08B. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $557.00, while CHDRY trades at $131.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.59, whereas CHDRY's P/E ratio is 16.13. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CHDRY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is less volatile compared to CHDRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.

LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 278.04B. In comparison, CHDRF has a market cap of 90.98B. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $557.00, while CHDRF trades at $504.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.59, whereas CHDRF's P/E ratio is 15.43. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CHDRF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is less volatile compared to CHDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.

LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 278.04B. In comparison, PPRUY has a market cap of 24.46B. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $557.00, while PPRUY trades at $19.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.59, whereas PPRUY's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PPRUY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is more volatile compared to PPRUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.

LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 278.04B. In comparison, PPRUF has a market cap of 23.94B. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $557.00, while PPRUF trades at $195.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.59, whereas PPRUF's P/E ratio is 18.67. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PPRUF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is more volatile compared to PPRUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.

LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 278.04B. In comparison, PRDSY has a market cap of 16.70B. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $557.00, while PRDSY trades at $13.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.59, whereas PRDSY's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PRDSY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is less volatile compared to PRDSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.

LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 278.04B. In comparison, PRDSF has a market cap of 15.92B. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $557.00, while PRDSF trades at $6.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.59, whereas PRDSF's P/E ratio is 16.81. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PRDSF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is more volatile compared to PRDSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.

LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 278.04B. In comparison, TPR has a market cap of 15.17B. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $557.00, while TPR trades at $73.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.59, whereas TPR's P/E ratio is 21.31. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TPR's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is less volatile compared to TPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.

LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 278.04B. In comparison, CJEWY has a market cap of 13.33B. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $557.00, while CJEWY trades at $13.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.59, whereas CJEWY's P/E ratio is 23.02. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CJEWY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is more volatile compared to CJEWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.

LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 278.04B. In comparison, CJEWF has a market cap of 11.99B. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $557.00, while CJEWF trades at $1.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.59, whereas CJEWF's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CJEWF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is less volatile compared to CJEWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.

LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 278.04B. In comparison, PNDZF has a market cap of 11.51B. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $557.00, while PNDZF trades at $151.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.59, whereas PNDZF's P/E ratio is 15.49. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PNDZF's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is more volatile compared to PNDZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.

LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 278.04B. In comparison, SWGAF has a market cap of 8.95B. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $557.00, while SWGAF trades at $173.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.59, whereas SWGAF's P/E ratio is 38.11. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SWGAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is more volatile compared to SWGAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.

LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 278.04B. In comparison, SWGNF has a market cap of 8.93B. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $557.00, while SWGNF trades at $34.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.59, whereas SWGNF's P/E ratio is 38.14. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SWGNF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is less volatile compared to SWGNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.

LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 278.04B. In comparison, SWGAY has a market cap of 8.73B. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $557.00, while SWGAY trades at $8.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.59, whereas SWGAY's P/E ratio is 36.57. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SWGAY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is more volatile compared to SWGAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.

LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 278.04B. In comparison, BCUCY has a market cap of 7.90B. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $557.00, while BCUCY trades at $11.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.59, whereas BCUCY's P/E ratio is 58.20. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BCUCY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is more volatile compared to BCUCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.

LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 278.04B. In comparison, BBRYF has a market cap of 3.60B. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $557.00, while BBRYF trades at $10.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.59, whereas BBRYF's P/E ratio is 71.79. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BBRYF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is less volatile compared to BBRYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.

LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 278.04B. In comparison, BURBY has a market cap of 3.48B. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $557.00, while BURBY trades at $9.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.59, whereas BURBY's P/E ratio is 69.50. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BURBY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is less volatile compared to BURBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.

LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 278.04B. In comparison, SIG has a market cap of 2.15B. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $557.00, while SIG trades at $49.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.59, whereas SIG's P/E ratio is 5.77. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SIG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is less volatile compared to SIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.

LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 278.04B. In comparison, CPRI has a market cap of 1.82B. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $557.00, while CPRI trades at $15.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.59, whereas CPRI's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CPRI's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is less volatile compared to CPRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.

LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 278.04B. In comparison, PANDY has a market cap of 1.80B. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $557.00, while PANDY trades at $21.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.59, whereas PANDY's P/E ratio is 10.75. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PANDY's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is less volatile compared to PANDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.

LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 278.04B. In comparison, LKFLF has a market cap of 1.41B. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $557.00, while LKFLF trades at $2.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.59, whereas LKFLF's P/E ratio is 8.57. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LKFLF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is more volatile compared to LKFLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.

LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 278.04B. In comparison, WOSGF has a market cap of 1.13B. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $557.00, while WOSGF trades at $4.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.59, whereas WOSGF's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WOSGF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is less volatile compared to WOSGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.

LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 278.04B. In comparison, SFRGF has a market cap of 1.10B. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $557.00, while SFRGF trades at $6.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.59, whereas SFRGF's P/E ratio is -14.15. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SFRGF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is less volatile compared to SFRGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.

LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 278.04B. In comparison, MYTE has a market cap of 1.04B. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $557.00, while MYTE trades at $7.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.59, whereas MYTE's P/E ratio is -16.61. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MYTE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is less volatile compared to MYTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.

LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 278.04B. In comparison, SFRGY has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $557.00, while SFRGY trades at $3.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.59, whereas SFRGY's P/E ratio is -13.48. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SFRGY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is less volatile compared to SFRGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.

LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 278.04B. In comparison, REAL has a market cap of 715.32M. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $557.00, while REAL trades at $6.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.59, whereas REAL's P/E ratio is -5.19. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to REAL's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is less volatile compared to REAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.

LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 278.04B. In comparison, CHOWF has a market cap of 591.99M. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $557.00, while CHOWF trades at $0.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.59, whereas CHOWF's P/E ratio is 5.87. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CHOWF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is less volatile compared to CHOWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.

LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 278.04B. In comparison, CTTLF has a market cap of 365.68M. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $557.00, while CTTLF trades at $0.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.59, whereas CTTLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CTTLF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is more volatile compared to CTTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.

LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 278.04B. In comparison, LANV has a market cap of 300.19M. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $557.00, while LANV trades at $2.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.59, whereas LANV's P/E ratio is -1.29. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LANV's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is less volatile compared to LANV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.

LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 278.04B. In comparison, ZAPNF has a market cap of 254.50M. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $557.00, while ZAPNF trades at $39.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.59, whereas ZAPNF's P/E ratio is 25.27. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ZAPNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is more volatile compared to ZAPNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.

LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 278.04B. In comparison, ORWHF has a market cap of 248.55M. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $557.00, while ORWHF trades at $0.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.59, whereas ORWHF's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ORWHF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is more volatile compared to ORWHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.

LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 278.04B. In comparison, MOV has a market cap of 224.69M. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $557.00, while MOV trades at $14.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.59, whereas MOV's P/E ratio is 17.58. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MOV's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is less volatile compared to MOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.

LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 278.04B. In comparison, DCOHF has a market cap of 216.19M. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $557.00, while DCOHF trades at $0.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.59, whereas DCOHF's P/E ratio is 6.22. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DCOHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is less volatile compared to DCOHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.

LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 278.04B. In comparison, TSSJF has a market cap of 195.34M. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $557.00, while TSSJF trades at $12.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.59, whereas TSSJF's P/E ratio is 26.60. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TSSJF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is more volatile compared to TSSJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.

LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 278.04B. In comparison, ELA has a market cap of 181.17M. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $557.00, while ELA trades at $6.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.59, whereas ELA's P/E ratio is 26.81. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ELA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is less volatile compared to ELA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.

LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 278.04B. In comparison, BRLT has a market cap of 154.95M. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $557.00, while BRLT trades at $1.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.59, whereas BRLT's P/E ratio is 52.00. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BRLT's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is less volatile compared to BRLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.

LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 278.04B. In comparison, FLLIY has a market cap of 139.29M. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $557.00, while FLLIY trades at $2.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.59, whereas FLLIY's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FLLIY's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is less volatile compared to FLLIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.

LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 278.04B. In comparison, EPRJF has a market cap of 108.85M. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $557.00, while EPRJF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.59, whereas EPRJF's P/E ratio is 1.50. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EPRJF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is less volatile compared to EPRJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.

LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 278.04B. In comparison, HENGF has a market cap of 100.41M. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $557.00, while HENGF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.59, whereas HENGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HENGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is more volatile compared to HENGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.

LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 278.04B. In comparison, CEBTF has a market cap of 78.33M. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $557.00, while CEBTF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.59, whereas CEBTF's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CEBTF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is less volatile compared to CEBTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.

LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 278.04B. In comparison, TOPW has a market cap of 74.34M. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $557.00, while TOPW trades at $2.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.59, whereas TOPW's P/E ratio is -299.00. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TOPW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is less volatile compared to TOPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.

LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 278.04B. In comparison, FOSL has a market cap of 63.27M. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $557.00, while FOSL trades at $1.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.59, whereas FOSL's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FOSL's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is less volatile compared to FOSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.

LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 278.04B. In comparison, MNNGF has a market cap of 61.79M. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $557.00, while MNNGF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.59, whereas MNNGF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MNNGF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is less volatile compared to MNNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.

LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 278.04B. In comparison, FOSLL has a market cap of 57.66M. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $557.00, while FOSLL trades at $14.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.59, whereas FOSLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FOSLL's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is less volatile compared to FOSLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.

LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 278.04B. In comparison, MENEF has a market cap of 26.68M. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $557.00, while MENEF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.59, whereas MENEF's P/E ratio is -10.25. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MENEF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is less volatile compared to MENEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.

LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 278.04B. In comparison, BGI has a market cap of 17.19M. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $557.00, while BGI trades at $0.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.59, whereas BGI's P/E ratio is -3.87. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BGI's ROE of +0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is less volatile compared to BGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.

LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 278.04B. In comparison, MDNL has a market cap of 10.49M. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $557.00, while MDNL trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.59, whereas MDNL's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MDNL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is more volatile compared to MDNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.

LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 278.04B. In comparison, MAJJ has a market cap of 5.21M. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $557.00, while MAJJ trades at $1,800.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.59, whereas MAJJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MAJJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is more volatile compared to MAJJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.

LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 278.04B. In comparison, BANI has a market cap of 4.08M. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $557.00, while BANI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.59, whereas BANI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BANI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is more volatile compared to BANI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.

LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 278.04B. In comparison, EATR has a market cap of 2.63M. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $557.00, while EATR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.59, whereas EATR's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EATR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is less volatile compared to EATR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.

LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 278.04B. In comparison, HENGY has a market cap of 2.61M. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $557.00, while HENGY trades at $0.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.59, whereas HENGY's P/E ratio is -7.40. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HENGY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is more volatile compared to HENGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.

LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 278.04B. In comparison, SSOK has a market cap of 572824.00. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $557.00, while SSOK trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.59, whereas SSOK's P/E ratio is 0.67. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SSOK's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is more volatile compared to SSOK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.

LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 278.04B. In comparison, BRGO has a market cap of 289833.00. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $557.00, while BRGO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.59, whereas BRGO's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BRGO's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is more volatile compared to BRGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.

LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 278.04B. In comparison, CTHR has a market cap of 234494.00. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $557.00, while CTHR trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.59, whereas CTHR's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CTHR's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is less volatile compared to CTHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.

LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 278.04B. In comparison, AVEW has a market cap of 125001.00. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $557.00, while AVEW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.59, whereas AVEW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AVEW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is less volatile compared to AVEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.

LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 278.04B. In comparison, MASN has a market cap of 109034.00. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $557.00, while MASN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.59, whereas MASN's P/E ratio is 0.04. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MASN's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is less volatile compared to MASN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.

LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 278.04B. In comparison, BRGOD has a market cap of 78066.00. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $557.00, while BRGOD trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.59, whereas BRGOD's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BRGOD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is less volatile compared to BRGOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.

LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 278.04B. In comparison, JEWL has a market cap of 38048.00. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $557.00, while JEWL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.59, whereas JEWL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to JEWL's ROE of +29.67%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is less volatile compared to JEWL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.

LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 278.04B. In comparison, FMFC comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $557.00, while FMFC trades at N/A.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.59, whereas FMFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FMFC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVMHF has daily volatility of 1.49 and FMFC has daily volatility of N/A.