LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne
LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (LVMHF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LVMHF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Luxury Goods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LVMHF | $570.75 | +2.90% | 287.1B | 22.35 | $25.90 | +2.48% |
| HESAF | $2,795.00 | +0.42% | 296.5B | 55.04 | $51.38 | +1.04% |
| HESAY | $276.89 | +0.50% | 294.7B | 54.70 | $5.14 | +0.99% |
| LVMUY | $114.04 | +3.67% | 287.9B | 22.37 | $5.18 | +1.75% |
| CFRUY | $17.18 | -1.38% | 105.6B | 24.31 | $0.72 | +1.84% |
| CFRHF | $172.40 | -3.95% | 103B | 23.66 | $7.44 | +1.85% |
| CHDRY | $136.95 | +5.09% | 98.8B | 16.25 | $8.43 | +2.52% |
| CHDRF | $529.59 | -0.00% | 95.5B | 15.63 | $33.89 | +2.58% |
| PPRUY | $25.09 | +1.65% | 32B | 24.17 | $1.08 | +1.47% |
| PPRUF | $260.00 | +0.00% | 31.9B | 24.19 | $10.75 | +2.54% |
Stock Comparison
LVMHF vs HESAF Comparison July 2025
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 287.1B. In comparison, HESAF has a market cap of 296.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $570.75, while HESAF trades at $2,795.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.35, whereas HESAF's P/E ratio is 55.04. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HESAF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is more volatile compared to HESAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.Check HESAF's competition here
LVMHF vs HESAY Comparison July 2025
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 287.1B. In comparison, HESAY has a market cap of 294.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $570.75, while HESAY trades at $276.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.35, whereas HESAY's P/E ratio is 54.70. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HESAY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is more volatile compared to HESAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.Check HESAY's competition here
LVMHF vs LVMUY Comparison July 2025
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 287.1B. In comparison, LVMUY has a market cap of 287.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $570.75, while LVMUY trades at $114.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.35, whereas LVMUY's P/E ratio is 22.37. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LVMUY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is more volatile compared to LVMUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.Check LVMUY's competition here
LVMHF vs CFRUY Comparison July 2025
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 287.1B. In comparison, CFRUY has a market cap of 105.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $570.75, while CFRUY trades at $17.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.35, whereas CFRUY's P/E ratio is 24.31. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CFRUY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is more volatile compared to CFRUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.Check CFRUY's competition here
LVMHF vs CFRHF Comparison July 2025
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 287.1B. In comparison, CFRHF has a market cap of 103B. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $570.75, while CFRHF trades at $172.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.35, whereas CFRHF's P/E ratio is 23.66. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CFRHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is more volatile compared to CFRHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.Check CFRHF's competition here
LVMHF vs CHDRY Comparison July 2025
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 287.1B. In comparison, CHDRY has a market cap of 98.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $570.75, while CHDRY trades at $136.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.35, whereas CHDRY's P/E ratio is 16.25. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CHDRY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is less volatile compared to CHDRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.Check CHDRY's competition here
LVMHF vs CHDRF Comparison July 2025
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 287.1B. In comparison, CHDRF has a market cap of 95.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $570.75, while CHDRF trades at $529.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.35, whereas CHDRF's P/E ratio is 15.63. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CHDRF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is more volatile compared to CHDRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.Check CHDRF's competition here
LVMHF vs PPRUY Comparison July 2025
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 287.1B. In comparison, PPRUY has a market cap of 32B. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $570.75, while PPRUY trades at $25.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.35, whereas PPRUY's P/E ratio is 24.17. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PPRUY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is more volatile compared to PPRUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.Check PPRUY's competition here
LVMHF vs PPRUF Comparison July 2025
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 287.1B. In comparison, PPRUF has a market cap of 31.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $570.75, while PPRUF trades at $260.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.35, whereas PPRUF's P/E ratio is 24.19. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PPRUF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is more volatile compared to PPRUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.Check PPRUF's competition here
LVMHF vs CJEWY Comparison July 2025
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 287.1B. In comparison, CJEWY has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $570.75, while CJEWY trades at $17.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.35, whereas CJEWY's P/E ratio is 23.93. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CJEWY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is more volatile compared to CJEWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.Check CJEWY's competition here
LVMHF vs PRDSY Comparison July 2025
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 287.1B. In comparison, PRDSY has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $570.75, while PRDSY trades at $12.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.35, whereas PRDSY's P/E ratio is 16.05. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PRDSY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF and PRDSY have similar daily volatility (1.23).Check PRDSY's competition here
LVMHF vs CJEWF Comparison July 2025
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 287.1B. In comparison, CJEWF has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $570.75, while CJEWF trades at $1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.35, whereas CJEWF's P/E ratio is 19.88. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CJEWF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is more volatile compared to CJEWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.Check CJEWF's competition here
LVMHF vs PRDSF Comparison July 2025
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 287.1B. In comparison, PRDSF has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $570.75, while PRDSF trades at $5.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.35, whereas PRDSF's P/E ratio is 15.41. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PRDSF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is more volatile compared to PRDSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.Check PRDSF's competition here
LVMHF vs PNDZF Comparison July 2025
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 287.1B. In comparison, PNDZF has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $570.75, while PNDZF trades at $169.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.35, whereas PNDZF's P/E ratio is 15.58. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PNDZF's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is more volatile compared to PNDZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.Check PNDZF's competition here
LVMHF vs SWGAY Comparison July 2025
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 287.1B. In comparison, SWGAY has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $570.75, while SWGAY trades at $9.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.35, whereas SWGAY's P/E ratio is 142.14. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SWGAY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is more volatile compared to SWGAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.Check SWGAY's competition here
LVMHF vs SWGNF Comparison July 2025
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 287.1B. In comparison, SWGNF has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $570.75, while SWGNF trades at $37.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.35, whereas SWGNF's P/E ratio is 126.33. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SWGNF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is more volatile compared to SWGNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.Check SWGNF's competition here
LVMHF vs SWGAF Comparison July 2025
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 287.1B. In comparison, SWGAF has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $570.75, while SWGAF trades at $169.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.35, whereas SWGAF's P/E ratio is 113.82. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SWGAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is more volatile compared to SWGAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.Check SWGAF's competition here
LVMHF vs BURBY Comparison July 2025
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 287.1B. In comparison, BURBY has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $570.75, while BURBY trades at $18.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.35, whereas BURBY's P/E ratio is -65.82. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BURBY's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is more volatile compared to BURBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.Check BURBY's competition here
LVMHF vs BBRYF Comparison July 2025
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 287.1B. In comparison, BBRYF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $570.75, while BBRYF trades at $18.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.35, whereas BBRYF's P/E ratio is -65.29. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BBRYF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is more volatile compared to BBRYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.Check BBRYF's competition here
LVMHF vs PANDY Comparison July 2025
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 287.1B. In comparison, PANDY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $570.75, while PANDY trades at $21.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.35, whereas PANDY's P/E ratio is 10.75. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PANDY's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is less volatile compared to PANDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.Check PANDY's competition here
LVMHF vs BCUCY Comparison July 2025
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 287.1B. In comparison, BCUCY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $570.75, while BCUCY trades at $11.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.35, whereas BCUCY's P/E ratio is 56.62. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BCUCY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is more volatile compared to BCUCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.Check BCUCY's competition here
LVMHF vs LKFLF Comparison July 2025
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 287.1B. In comparison, LKFLF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $570.75, while LKFLF trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.35, whereas LKFLF's P/E ratio is 11.25. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LKFLF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is less volatile compared to LKFLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.Check LKFLF's competition here
LVMHF vs WOSGF Comparison July 2025
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 287.1B. In comparison, WOSGF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $570.75, while WOSGF trades at $4.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.35, whereas WOSGF's P/E ratio is 15.87. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WOSGF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is more volatile compared to WOSGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.Check WOSGF's competition here
LVMHF vs SFRGF Comparison July 2025
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 287.1B. In comparison, SFRGF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $570.75, while SFRGF trades at $6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.35, whereas SFRGF's P/E ratio is -13.33. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SFRGF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is less volatile compared to SFRGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.Check SFRGF's competition here
LVMHF vs SFRGY Comparison July 2025
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 287.1B. In comparison, SFRGY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $570.75, while SFRGY trades at $3.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.35, whereas SFRGY's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SFRGY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is more volatile compared to SFRGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.Check SFRGY's competition here
LVMHF vs CHOWF Comparison July 2025
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 287.1B. In comparison, CHOWF has a market cap of 712M. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $570.75, while CHOWF trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.35, whereas CHOWF's P/E ratio is 7.07. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CHOWF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is more volatile compared to CHOWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.Check CHOWF's competition here
LVMHF vs EPRJF Comparison July 2025
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 287.1B. In comparison, EPRJF has a market cap of 435.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $570.75, while EPRJF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.35, whereas EPRJF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EPRJF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is less volatile compared to EPRJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.Check EPRJF's competition here
LVMHF vs FLLIY Comparison July 2025
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 287.1B. In comparison, FLLIY has a market cap of 404.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $570.75, while FLLIY trades at $6.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.35, whereas FLLIY's P/E ratio is -1.56. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FLLIY's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is less volatile compared to FLLIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.Check FLLIY's competition here
LVMHF vs ZAPNF Comparison July 2025
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 287.1B. In comparison, ZAPNF has a market cap of 254.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $570.75, while ZAPNF trades at $39.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.35, whereas ZAPNF's P/E ratio is 25.27. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ZAPNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is more volatile compared to ZAPNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.Check ZAPNF's competition here
LVMHF vs ORWHF Comparison July 2025
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 287.1B. In comparison, ORWHF has a market cap of 248.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $570.75, while ORWHF trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.35, whereas ORWHF's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ORWHF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is more volatile compared to ORWHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.Check ORWHF's competition here
LVMHF vs DCOHF Comparison July 2025
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 287.1B. In comparison, DCOHF has a market cap of 216.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $570.75, while DCOHF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.35, whereas DCOHF's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DCOHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is more volatile compared to DCOHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.Check DCOHF's competition here
LVMHF vs TSSJF Comparison July 2025
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 287.1B. In comparison, TSSJF has a market cap of 195.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $570.75, while TSSJF trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.35, whereas TSSJF's P/E ratio is 26.60. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TSSJF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is more volatile compared to TSSJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.Check TSSJF's competition here
LVMHF vs HENGF Comparison July 2025
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 287.1B. In comparison, HENGF has a market cap of 100.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $570.75, while HENGF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.35, whereas HENGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HENGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is more volatile compared to HENGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.Check HENGF's competition here
LVMHF vs CTTLF Comparison July 2025
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 287.1B. In comparison, CTTLF has a market cap of 86.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $570.75, while CTTLF trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.35, whereas CTTLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CTTLF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is more volatile compared to CTTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.Check CTTLF's competition here
LVMHF vs CEBTF Comparison July 2025
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 287.1B. In comparison, CEBTF has a market cap of 78.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $570.75, while CEBTF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.35, whereas CEBTF's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CEBTF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is less volatile compared to CEBTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.Check CEBTF's competition here
LVMHF vs MNNGF Comparison July 2025
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 287.1B. In comparison, MNNGF has a market cap of 65.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $570.75, while MNNGF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.35, whereas MNNGF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MNNGF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is less volatile compared to MNNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.Check MNNGF's competition here
LVMHF vs MENEF Comparison July 2025
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 287.1B. In comparison, MENEF has a market cap of 31.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $570.75, while MENEF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.35, whereas MENEF's P/E ratio is -12.24. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MENEF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is less volatile compared to MENEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.Check MENEF's competition here
LVMHF vs MDNL Comparison July 2025
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 287.1B. In comparison, MDNL has a market cap of 10.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $570.75, while MDNL trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.35, whereas MDNL's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MDNL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is more volatile compared to MDNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.Check MDNL's competition here
LVMHF vs MAJJ Comparison July 2025
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 287.1B. In comparison, MAJJ has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $570.75, while MAJJ trades at $1,800.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.35, whereas MAJJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MAJJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is more volatile compared to MAJJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.Check MAJJ's competition here
LVMHF vs BANI Comparison July 2025
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 287.1B. In comparison, BANI has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $570.75, while BANI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.35, whereas BANI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BANI's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is more volatile compared to BANI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.Check BANI's competition here
LVMHF vs HENGY Comparison July 2025
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 287.1B. In comparison, HENGY has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $570.75, while HENGY trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.35, whereas HENGY's P/E ratio is -7.40. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HENGY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is more volatile compared to HENGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.Check HENGY's competition here
LVMHF vs EATR Comparison July 2025
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 287.1B. In comparison, EATR has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $570.75, while EATR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.35, whereas EATR's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EATR's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is more volatile compared to EATR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.Check EATR's competition here
LVMHF vs SSOK Comparison July 2025
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 287.1B. In comparison, SSOK has a market cap of 494.7K. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $570.75, while SSOK trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.35, whereas SSOK's P/E ratio is 0.58. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SSOK's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is more volatile compared to SSOK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.Check SSOK's competition here
LVMHF vs BRGO Comparison July 2025
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 287.1B. In comparison, BRGO has a market cap of 289.8K. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $570.75, while BRGO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.35, whereas BRGO's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BRGO's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is more volatile compared to BRGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.Check BRGO's competition here
LVMHF vs AVEW Comparison July 2025
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 287.1B. In comparison, AVEW has a market cap of 125K. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $570.75, while AVEW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.35, whereas AVEW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AVEW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is more volatile compared to AVEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.Check AVEW's competition here
LVMHF vs MASN Comparison July 2025
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 287.1B. In comparison, MASN has a market cap of 122.7K. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $570.75, while MASN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.35, whereas MASN's P/E ratio is 0.05. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MASN's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is less volatile compared to MASN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.Check MASN's competition here
LVMHF vs BRGOD Comparison July 2025
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 287.1B. In comparison, BRGOD has a market cap of 78.1K. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $570.75, while BRGOD trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.35, whereas BRGOD's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BRGOD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is less volatile compared to BRGOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.Check BRGOD's competition here