LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne
LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne LVMHF Peers
See (LVMHF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Luxury Goods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LVMHF | $554.64 | -2.94% | 276.9B | 18.70 | $29.66 | +2.57% |
| HESAF | $2,824.50 | +2.57% | 296.1B | 55.43 | $50.96 | +1.03% |
| HESAY | $281.05 | +1.78% | 294.6B | 55.22 | $5.09 | +0.99% |
| LVMUY | $111.34 | -2.39% | 277.9B | 19.30 | $5.77 | +1.82% |
| CFRUY | $18.81 | -0.37% | 110B | 25.08 | $0.75 | +1.92% |
| CFRHF | $184.81 | -0.91% | 108.2B | 24.51 | $7.54 | +1.76% |
| CHDRY | $135.00 | -1.92% | 97.4B | 15.96 | $8.46 | +1.93% |
| CHDRF | $522.78 | -1.13% | 94.3B | 15.38 | $34.00 | +2.61% |
| PPRUF | $230.07 | -4.78% | 28.2B | 21.62 | $10.64 | +2.87% |
| PPRUY | $22.79 | -2.13% | 27.9B | 21.10 | $1.08 | +1.69% |
Stock Comparison
LVMHF vs HESAF Comparison
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 276.9B. In comparison, HESAF has a market cap of 296.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $554.64, while HESAF trades at $2,824.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.70, whereas HESAF's P/E ratio is 55.43. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HESAF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is less volatile compared to HESAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.
LVMHF vs HESAY Comparison
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 276.9B. In comparison, HESAY has a market cap of 294.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $554.64, while HESAY trades at $281.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.70, whereas HESAY's P/E ratio is 55.22. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HESAY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is less volatile compared to HESAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.
LVMHF vs LVMUY Comparison
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 276.9B. In comparison, LVMUY has a market cap of 277.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $554.64, while LVMUY trades at $111.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.70, whereas LVMUY's P/E ratio is 19.30. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LVMUY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is more volatile compared to LVMUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.
LVMHF vs CFRUY Comparison
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 276.9B. In comparison, CFRUY has a market cap of 110B. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $554.64, while CFRUY trades at $18.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.70, whereas CFRUY's P/E ratio is 25.08. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CFRUY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is more volatile compared to CFRUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.
LVMHF vs CFRHF Comparison
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 276.9B. In comparison, CFRHF has a market cap of 108.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $554.64, while CFRHF trades at $184.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.70, whereas CFRHF's P/E ratio is 24.51. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CFRHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is less volatile compared to CFRHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.
LVMHF vs CHDRY Comparison
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 276.9B. In comparison, CHDRY has a market cap of 97.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $554.64, while CHDRY trades at $135.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.70, whereas CHDRY's P/E ratio is 15.96. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CHDRY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is less volatile compared to CHDRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.
LVMHF vs CHDRF Comparison
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 276.9B. In comparison, CHDRF has a market cap of 94.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $554.64, while CHDRF trades at $522.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.70, whereas CHDRF's P/E ratio is 15.38. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CHDRF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is more volatile compared to CHDRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.
LVMHF vs PPRUF Comparison
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 276.9B. In comparison, PPRUF has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $554.64, while PPRUF trades at $230.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.70, whereas PPRUF's P/E ratio is 21.62. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PPRUF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is more volatile compared to PPRUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.
LVMHF vs PPRUY Comparison
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 276.9B. In comparison, PPRUY has a market cap of 27.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $554.64, while PPRUY trades at $22.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.70, whereas PPRUY's P/E ratio is 21.10. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PPRUY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is less volatile compared to PPRUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.
LVMHF vs CJEWY Comparison
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 276.9B. In comparison, CJEWY has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $554.64, while CJEWY trades at $16.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.70, whereas CJEWY's P/E ratio is 22.53. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CJEWY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is more volatile compared to CJEWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.
LVMHF vs PRDSY Comparison
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 276.9B. In comparison, PRDSY has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $554.64, while PRDSY trades at $12.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.70, whereas PRDSY's P/E ratio is 16.87. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PRDSY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is less volatile compared to PRDSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.
LVMHF vs PRDSF Comparison
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 276.9B. In comparison, PRDSF has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $554.64, while PRDSF trades at $5.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.70, whereas PRDSF's P/E ratio is 15.61. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PRDSF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is less volatile compared to PRDSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.
LVMHF vs CJEWF Comparison
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 276.9B. In comparison, CJEWF has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $554.64, while CJEWF trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.70, whereas CJEWF's P/E ratio is 18.38. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CJEWF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is more volatile compared to CJEWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.
LVMHF vs PNDZF Comparison
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 276.9B. In comparison, PNDZF has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $554.64, while PNDZF trades at $169.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.70, whereas PNDZF's P/E ratio is 16.22. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PNDZF's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is more volatile compared to PNDZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.
LVMHF vs SWGAF Comparison
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 276.9B. In comparison, SWGAF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $554.64, while SWGAF trades at $180.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.70, whereas SWGAF's P/E ratio is 37.97. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SWGAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is more volatile compared to SWGAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.
LVMHF vs SWGNF Comparison
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 276.9B. In comparison, SWGNF has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $554.64, while SWGNF trades at $33.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.70, whereas SWGNF's P/E ratio is 37.33. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SWGNF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is less volatile compared to SWGNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.
LVMHF vs SWGAY Comparison
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 276.9B. In comparison, SWGAY has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $554.64, while SWGAY trades at $8.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.70, whereas SWGAY's P/E ratio is 35.04. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SWGAY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is more volatile compared to SWGAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.
LVMHF vs BBRYF Comparison
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 276.9B. In comparison, BBRYF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $554.64, while BBRYF trades at $17.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.70, whereas BBRYF's P/E ratio is -61.21. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BBRYF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is more volatile compared to BBRYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.
LVMHF vs BURBY Comparison
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 276.9B. In comparison, BURBY has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $554.64, while BURBY trades at $16.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.70, whereas BURBY's P/E ratio is -58.31. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BURBY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is more volatile compared to BURBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.
LVMHF vs PANDY Comparison
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 276.9B. In comparison, PANDY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $554.64, while PANDY trades at $21.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.70, whereas PANDY's P/E ratio is 10.75. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PANDY's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is less volatile compared to PANDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.
LVMHF vs BCUCY Comparison
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 276.9B. In comparison, BCUCY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $554.64, while BCUCY trades at $12.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.70, whereas BCUCY's P/E ratio is 60.32. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BCUCY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is less volatile compared to BCUCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.
LVMHF vs LKFLF Comparison
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 276.9B. In comparison, LKFLF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $554.64, while LKFLF trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.70, whereas LKFLF's P/E ratio is 10.21. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LKFLF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is less volatile compared to LKFLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.
LVMHF vs SFRGF Comparison
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 276.9B. In comparison, SFRGF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $554.64, while SFRGF trades at $8.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.70, whereas SFRGF's P/E ratio is -16.83. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SFRGF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is more volatile compared to SFRGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.
LVMHF vs WOSGF Comparison
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 276.9B. In comparison, WOSGF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $554.64, while WOSGF trades at $5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.70, whereas WOSGF's P/E ratio is 17.10. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WOSGF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is less volatile compared to WOSGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.
LVMHF vs SFRGY Comparison
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 276.9B. In comparison, SFRGY has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $554.64, while SFRGY trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.70, whereas SFRGY's P/E ratio is -12.90. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SFRGY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is less volatile compared to SFRGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.
LVMHF vs CHOWF Comparison
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 276.9B. In comparison, CHOWF has a market cap of 666.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $554.64, while CHOWF trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.70, whereas CHOWF's P/E ratio is 6.62. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CHOWF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is less volatile compared to CHOWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.
LVMHF vs CEBTF Comparison
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 276.9B. In comparison, CEBTF has a market cap of 587.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $554.64, while CEBTF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.70, whereas CEBTF's P/E ratio is -13.50. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CEBTF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is more volatile compared to CEBTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.
LVMHF vs EPRJF Comparison
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 276.9B. In comparison, EPRJF has a market cap of 435.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $554.64, while EPRJF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.70, whereas EPRJF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EPRJF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is less volatile compared to EPRJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.
LVMHF vs ZAPNF Comparison
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 276.9B. In comparison, ZAPNF has a market cap of 254.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $554.64, while ZAPNF trades at $39.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.70, whereas ZAPNF's P/E ratio is 25.27. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ZAPNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is more volatile compared to ZAPNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.
LVMHF vs ORWHF Comparison
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 276.9B. In comparison, ORWHF has a market cap of 248.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $554.64, while ORWHF trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.70, whereas ORWHF's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ORWHF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is less volatile compared to ORWHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.
LVMHF vs DCOHF Comparison
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 276.9B. In comparison, DCOHF has a market cap of 227M. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $554.64, while DCOHF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.70, whereas DCOHF's P/E ratio is 9.80. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DCOHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is more volatile compared to DCOHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.
LVMHF vs TSSJF Comparison
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 276.9B. In comparison, TSSJF has a market cap of 195.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $554.64, while TSSJF trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.70, whereas TSSJF's P/E ratio is 26.60. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TSSJF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is more volatile compared to TSSJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.
LVMHF vs FLLIY Comparison
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 276.9B. In comparison, FLLIY has a market cap of 139.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $554.64, while FLLIY trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.70, whereas FLLIY's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FLLIY's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is less volatile compared to FLLIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.
LVMHF vs HENGF Comparison
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 276.9B. In comparison, HENGF has a market cap of 100.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $554.64, while HENGF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.70, whereas HENGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HENGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is more volatile compared to HENGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.
LVMHF vs CTTLF Comparison
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 276.9B. In comparison, CTTLF has a market cap of 80.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $554.64, while CTTLF trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.70, whereas CTTLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CTTLF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is more volatile compared to CTTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.
LVMHF vs MNNGF Comparison
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 276.9B. In comparison, MNNGF has a market cap of 61.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $554.64, while MNNGF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.70, whereas MNNGF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MNNGF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is less volatile compared to MNNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.
LVMHF vs MENEF Comparison
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 276.9B. In comparison, MENEF has a market cap of 26M. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $554.64, while MENEF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.70, whereas MENEF's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MENEF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is more volatile compared to MENEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.
LVMHF vs MDNL Comparison
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 276.9B. In comparison, MDNL has a market cap of 10.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $554.64, while MDNL trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.70, whereas MDNL's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MDNL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is more volatile compared to MDNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.
LVMHF vs MAJJ Comparison
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 276.9B. In comparison, MAJJ has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $554.64, while MAJJ trades at $1,800.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.70, whereas MAJJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MAJJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is more volatile compared to MAJJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.
LVMHF vs BANI Comparison
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 276.9B. In comparison, BANI has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $554.64, while BANI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.70, whereas BANI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BANI's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is more volatile compared to BANI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.
LVMHF vs HENGY Comparison
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 276.9B. In comparison, HENGY has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $554.64, while HENGY trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.70, whereas HENGY's P/E ratio is -7.46. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HENGY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is more volatile compared to HENGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.
LVMHF vs EATR Comparison
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 276.9B. In comparison, EATR has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $554.64, while EATR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.70, whereas EATR's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EATR's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is less volatile compared to EATR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.
LVMHF vs SSOK Comparison
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 276.9B. In comparison, SSOK has a market cap of 916K. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $554.64, while SSOK trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.70, whereas SSOK's P/E ratio is 1.07. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SSOK's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is less volatile compared to SSOK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.
LVMHF vs BRGO Comparison
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 276.9B. In comparison, BRGO has a market cap of 289.8K. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $554.64, while BRGO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.70, whereas BRGO's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BRGO's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is more volatile compared to BRGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.
LVMHF vs AVEW Comparison
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 276.9B. In comparison, AVEW has a market cap of 250K. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $554.64, while AVEW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.70, whereas AVEW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AVEW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is less volatile compared to AVEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.
LVMHF vs MASN Comparison
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 276.9B. In comparison, MASN has a market cap of 109K. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $554.64, while MASN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.70, whereas MASN's P/E ratio is 0.04. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MASN's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is less volatile compared to MASN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.
LVMHF vs BRGOD Comparison
LVMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVMHF stands at 276.9B. In comparison, BRGOD has a market cap of 78.1K. Regarding current trading prices, LVMHF is priced at $554.64, while BRGOD trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.70, whereas BRGOD's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, LVMHF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BRGOD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LVMHF is less volatile compared to BRGOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVMHF.