Lang & Schwarz AG
Lang & Schwarz AG (LUS1.F) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LUS1.F) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Capital Markets Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LUS1.F | €22.20 | +0.45% | 207.6M | 9.40 | €2.34 | +7.99% |
| DWD.DE | €121.72 | +0.00% | 193.9B | 15.92 | €7.63 | +2.82% |
| GOS.DE | €625.10 | +0.00% | 187.4B | 15.79 | €39.19 | +1.75% |
| FTK.DE | €27.32 | +0.00% | 3B | 27.39 | €1.02 | +0.14% |
| CS3.F | €6.00 | +0.00% | 907.6M | -8.03 | -€0.76 | N/A |
| O4B.DE | €21.80 | +0.00% | 310.7M | 19.12 | €1.14 | +4.59% |
| XTP.F | €105.00 | -0.94% | 247.8M | 212.00 | €0.50 | N/A |
| XTP.DE | €105.50 | +0.00% | 240.8M | 206.00 | €0.50 | N/A |
| BWB.DE | €4.90 | +0.00% | 234.2M | 4.85 | €0.99 | +2.71% |
| LUS1.DE | €22.10 | +0.00% | 206.7M | 9.36 | €2.34 | +7.99% |
Stock Comparison
LUS1.F vs DWD.DE Comparison August 2025
LUS1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUS1.F stands at 207.6M. In comparison, DWD.DE has a market cap of 193.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LUS1.F is priced at €22.20, while DWD.DE trades at €121.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUS1.F currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas DWD.DE's P/E ratio is 15.92. In terms of profitability, LUS1.F's ROE is +0.36%, compared to DWD.DE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LUS1.F is more volatile compared to DWD.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUS1.F.Check DWD.DE's competition here
LUS1.F vs GOS.DE Comparison August 2025
LUS1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUS1.F stands at 207.6M. In comparison, GOS.DE has a market cap of 187.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LUS1.F is priced at €22.20, while GOS.DE trades at €625.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUS1.F currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas GOS.DE's P/E ratio is 15.79. In terms of profitability, LUS1.F's ROE is +0.36%, compared to GOS.DE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LUS1.F is more volatile compared to GOS.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUS1.F.Check GOS.DE's competition here
LUS1.F vs FTK.DE Comparison August 2025
LUS1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUS1.F stands at 207.6M. In comparison, FTK.DE has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LUS1.F is priced at €22.20, while FTK.DE trades at €27.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUS1.F currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas FTK.DE's P/E ratio is 27.39. In terms of profitability, LUS1.F's ROE is +0.36%, compared to FTK.DE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LUS1.F is less volatile compared to FTK.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUS1.F.Check FTK.DE's competition here
LUS1.F vs CS3.F Comparison August 2025
LUS1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUS1.F stands at 207.6M. In comparison, CS3.F has a market cap of 907.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LUS1.F is priced at €22.20, while CS3.F trades at €6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUS1.F currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas CS3.F's P/E ratio is -8.03. In terms of profitability, LUS1.F's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CS3.F's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LUS1.F is more volatile compared to CS3.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUS1.F.Check CS3.F's competition here
LUS1.F vs O4B.DE Comparison August 2025
LUS1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUS1.F stands at 207.6M. In comparison, O4B.DE has a market cap of 310.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LUS1.F is priced at €22.20, while O4B.DE trades at €21.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUS1.F currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas O4B.DE's P/E ratio is 19.12. In terms of profitability, LUS1.F's ROE is +0.36%, compared to O4B.DE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LUS1.F is more volatile compared to O4B.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUS1.F.Check O4B.DE's competition here
LUS1.F vs XTP.F Comparison August 2025
LUS1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUS1.F stands at 207.6M. In comparison, XTP.F has a market cap of 247.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LUS1.F is priced at €22.20, while XTP.F trades at €105.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUS1.F currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas XTP.F's P/E ratio is 212.00. In terms of profitability, LUS1.F's ROE is +0.36%, compared to XTP.F's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LUS1.F is less volatile compared to XTP.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUS1.F.Check XTP.F's competition here
LUS1.F vs XTP.DE Comparison August 2025
LUS1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUS1.F stands at 207.6M. In comparison, XTP.DE has a market cap of 240.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LUS1.F is priced at €22.20, while XTP.DE trades at €105.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUS1.F currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas XTP.DE's P/E ratio is 206.00. In terms of profitability, LUS1.F's ROE is +0.36%, compared to XTP.DE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LUS1.F is less volatile compared to XTP.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUS1.F.Check XTP.DE's competition here
LUS1.F vs BWB.DE Comparison August 2025
LUS1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUS1.F stands at 207.6M. In comparison, BWB.DE has a market cap of 234.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LUS1.F is priced at €22.20, while BWB.DE trades at €4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUS1.F currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas BWB.DE's P/E ratio is 4.85. In terms of profitability, LUS1.F's ROE is +0.36%, compared to BWB.DE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LUS1.F is less volatile compared to BWB.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUS1.F.Check BWB.DE's competition here
LUS1.F vs LUS1.DE Comparison August 2025
LUS1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUS1.F stands at 207.6M. In comparison, LUS1.DE has a market cap of 206.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LUS1.F is priced at €22.20, while LUS1.DE trades at €22.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUS1.F currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas LUS1.DE's P/E ratio is 9.36. In terms of profitability, LUS1.F's ROE is +0.36%, compared to LUS1.DE's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LUS1.F is more volatile compared to LUS1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUS1.F.Check LUS1.DE's competition here
LUS1.F vs N4G.DE Comparison August 2025
LUS1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUS1.F stands at 207.6M. In comparison, N4G.DE has a market cap of 150.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LUS1.F is priced at €22.20, while N4G.DE trades at €0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUS1.F currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas N4G.DE's P/E ratio is -22.20. In terms of profitability, LUS1.F's ROE is +0.36%, compared to N4G.DE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LUS1.F is less volatile compared to N4G.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUS1.F.Check N4G.DE's competition here
LUS1.F vs 6AX.F Comparison August 2025
LUS1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUS1.F stands at 207.6M. In comparison, 6AX.F has a market cap of 33.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LUS1.F is priced at €22.20, while 6AX.F trades at €0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUS1.F currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas 6AX.F's P/E ratio is -2.83. In terms of profitability, LUS1.F's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 6AX.F's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LUS1.F is less volatile compared to 6AX.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUS1.F.Check 6AX.F's competition here
LUS1.F vs 7111.F Comparison August 2025
LUS1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUS1.F stands at 207.6M. In comparison, 7111.F has a market cap of 25.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LUS1.F is priced at €22.20, while 7111.F trades at €0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUS1.F currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas 7111.F's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, LUS1.F's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 7111.F's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LUS1.F is more volatile compared to 7111.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUS1.F.Check 7111.F's competition here
LUS1.F vs MWB.DE Comparison August 2025
LUS1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUS1.F stands at 207.6M. In comparison, MWB.DE has a market cap of 25.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LUS1.F is priced at €22.20, while MWB.DE trades at €3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUS1.F currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas MWB.DE's P/E ratio is 8.10. In terms of profitability, LUS1.F's ROE is +0.36%, compared to MWB.DE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LUS1.F is more volatile compared to MWB.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUS1.F.Check MWB.DE's competition here
LUS1.F vs DFTK.DE Comparison August 2025
LUS1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUS1.F stands at 207.6M. In comparison, DFTK.DE has a market cap of 21.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LUS1.F is priced at €22.20, while DFTK.DE trades at €1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUS1.F currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas DFTK.DE's P/E ratio is 11.38. In terms of profitability, LUS1.F's ROE is +0.36%, compared to DFTK.DE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LUS1.F is less volatile compared to DFTK.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUS1.F.Check DFTK.DE's competition here
LUS1.F vs LUS.DE Comparison August 2025
LUS1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUS1.F stands at 207.6M. In comparison, LUS.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LUS1.F is priced at €22.20, while LUS.DE trades at €73.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUS1.F currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas LUS.DE's P/E ratio is 15.66. In terms of profitability, LUS1.F's ROE is +0.36%, compared to LUS.DE's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LUS1.F is less volatile compared to LUS.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUS1.F.Check LUS.DE's competition here