Lang & Schwarz AG
Lang & Schwarz AG (LUS1.F) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LUS1.F) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Capital Markets Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LUS1.F | €25.20 | +4.56% | 227.5M | 7.75 | €3.11 | +7.06% |
| DWD.DE | €143.00 | +2.20% | 222.1B | 15.79 | €8.86 | +2.40% |
| GOS.DE | €738.30 | +3.50% | 212B | 16.05 | €44.53 | +1.87% |
| 4T0.SG | €101.00 | -0.98% | 21.8B | N/A | N/A | +0.22% |
| FTK.DE | €30.94 | +5.96% | 3.1B | 24.30 | €1.21 | +0.14% |
| 9PR.SG | €21.85 | +5.50% | 2.5B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| CS3.F | €4.64 | +8.92% | 668.6M | -5.60 | -€0.80 | N/A |
| BWB.DE | €6.80 | -0.73% | 319.6M | 6.62 | €0.99 | +1.98% |
| O4B.DE | €21.80 | -0.91% | 310.7M | 26.91 | €0.81 | +4.59% |
| LUS1.DE | €26.00 | +7.00% | 234.1M | 7.97 | €3.11 | +7.06% |
Stock Comparison
LUS1.F vs DWD.DE Comparison April 2026
LUS1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUS1.F stands at 227.5M. In comparison, DWD.DE has a market cap of 222.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LUS1.F is priced at €25.20, while DWD.DE trades at €143.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUS1.F currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas DWD.DE's P/E ratio is 15.79. In terms of profitability, LUS1.F's ROE is +0.40%, compared to DWD.DE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LUS1.F is more volatile compared to DWD.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUS1.F.Check DWD.DE's competition here
LUS1.F vs GOS.DE Comparison April 2026
LUS1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUS1.F stands at 227.5M. In comparison, GOS.DE has a market cap of 212B. Regarding current trading prices, LUS1.F is priced at €25.20, while GOS.DE trades at €738.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUS1.F currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas GOS.DE's P/E ratio is 16.05. In terms of profitability, LUS1.F's ROE is +0.40%, compared to GOS.DE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LUS1.F is more volatile compared to GOS.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUS1.F.Check GOS.DE's competition here
LUS1.F vs 4T0.SG Comparison April 2026
LUS1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUS1.F stands at 227.5M. In comparison, 4T0.SG has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LUS1.F is priced at €25.20, while 4T0.SG trades at €101.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUS1.F currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas 4T0.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LUS1.F's ROE is +0.40%, compared to 4T0.SG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LUS1.F is more volatile compared to 4T0.SG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUS1.F.Check 4T0.SG's competition here
LUS1.F vs FTK.DE Comparison April 2026
LUS1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUS1.F stands at 227.5M. In comparison, FTK.DE has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LUS1.F is priced at €25.20, while FTK.DE trades at €30.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUS1.F currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas FTK.DE's P/E ratio is 24.30. In terms of profitability, LUS1.F's ROE is +0.40%, compared to FTK.DE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LUS1.F is less volatile compared to FTK.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUS1.F.Check FTK.DE's competition here
LUS1.F vs 9PR.SG Comparison April 2026
LUS1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUS1.F stands at 227.5M. In comparison, 9PR.SG has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LUS1.F is priced at €25.20, while 9PR.SG trades at €21.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUS1.F currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas 9PR.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LUS1.F's ROE is +0.40%, compared to 9PR.SG's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LUS1.F is less volatile compared to 9PR.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUS1.F.Check 9PR.SG's competition here
LUS1.F vs CS3.F Comparison April 2026
LUS1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUS1.F stands at 227.5M. In comparison, CS3.F has a market cap of 668.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LUS1.F is priced at €25.20, while CS3.F trades at €4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUS1.F currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas CS3.F's P/E ratio is -5.60. In terms of profitability, LUS1.F's ROE is +0.40%, compared to CS3.F's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LUS1.F is less volatile compared to CS3.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUS1.F.Check CS3.F's competition here
LUS1.F vs BWB.DE Comparison April 2026
LUS1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUS1.F stands at 227.5M. In comparison, BWB.DE has a market cap of 319.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LUS1.F is priced at €25.20, while BWB.DE trades at €6.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUS1.F currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas BWB.DE's P/E ratio is 6.62. In terms of profitability, LUS1.F's ROE is +0.40%, compared to BWB.DE's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LUS1.F is less volatile compared to BWB.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUS1.F.Check BWB.DE's competition here
LUS1.F vs O4B.DE Comparison April 2026
LUS1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUS1.F stands at 227.5M. In comparison, O4B.DE has a market cap of 310.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LUS1.F is priced at €25.20, while O4B.DE trades at €21.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUS1.F currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas O4B.DE's P/E ratio is 26.91. In terms of profitability, LUS1.F's ROE is +0.40%, compared to O4B.DE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LUS1.F is more volatile compared to O4B.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUS1.F.Check O4B.DE's competition here
LUS1.F vs LUS1.DE Comparison April 2026
LUS1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUS1.F stands at 227.5M. In comparison, LUS1.DE has a market cap of 234.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LUS1.F is priced at €25.20, while LUS1.DE trades at €26.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUS1.F currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas LUS1.DE's P/E ratio is 7.97. In terms of profitability, LUS1.F's ROE is +0.40%, compared to LUS1.DE's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LUS1.F is less volatile compared to LUS1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUS1.F.Check LUS1.DE's competition here
LUS1.F vs XTP.F Comparison April 2026
LUS1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUS1.F stands at 227.5M. In comparison, XTP.F has a market cap of 217.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LUS1.F is priced at €25.20, while XTP.F trades at €94.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUS1.F currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas XTP.F's P/E ratio is 186.40. In terms of profitability, LUS1.F's ROE is +0.40%, compared to XTP.F's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LUS1.F is less volatile compared to XTP.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUS1.F.Check XTP.F's competition here
LUS1.F vs XTP.DE Comparison April 2026
LUS1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUS1.F stands at 227.5M. In comparison, XTP.DE has a market cap of 216.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LUS1.F is priced at €25.20, while XTP.DE trades at €94.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUS1.F currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas XTP.DE's P/E ratio is 185.20. In terms of profitability, LUS1.F's ROE is +0.40%, compared to XTP.DE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LUS1.F is more volatile compared to XTP.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUS1.F.Check XTP.DE's competition here
LUS1.F vs MWB0.DE Comparison April 2026
LUS1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUS1.F stands at 227.5M. In comparison, MWB0.DE has a market cap of 72.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LUS1.F is priced at €25.20, while MWB0.DE trades at €9.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUS1.F currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas MWB0.DE's P/E ratio is 6.36. In terms of profitability, LUS1.F's ROE is +0.40%, compared to MWB0.DE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LUS1.F is less volatile compared to MWB0.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUS1.F.Check MWB0.DE's competition here
LUS1.F vs FZK0.F Comparison April 2026
LUS1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUS1.F stands at 227.5M. In comparison, FZK0.F has a market cap of 65M. Regarding current trading prices, LUS1.F is priced at €25.20, while FZK0.F trades at €4.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUS1.F currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas FZK0.F's P/E ratio is -1.28. In terms of profitability, LUS1.F's ROE is +0.40%, compared to FZK0.F's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LUS1.F is more volatile compared to FZK0.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUS1.F.Check FZK0.F's competition here
LUS1.F vs N4G0.DE Comparison April 2026
LUS1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUS1.F stands at 227.5M. In comparison, N4G0.DE has a market cap of 32.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LUS1.F is priced at €25.20, while N4G0.DE trades at €1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUS1.F currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas N4G0.DE's P/E ratio is -6.34. In terms of profitability, LUS1.F's ROE is +0.40%, compared to N4G0.DE's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LUS1.F is more volatile compared to N4G0.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUS1.F.Check N4G0.DE's competition here
LUS1.F vs 6AX.F Comparison April 2026
LUS1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUS1.F stands at 227.5M. In comparison, 6AX.F has a market cap of 28.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LUS1.F is priced at €25.20, while 6AX.F trades at €0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUS1.F currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas 6AX.F's P/E ratio is -4.66. In terms of profitability, LUS1.F's ROE is +0.40%, compared to 6AX.F's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LUS1.F is less volatile compared to 6AX.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUS1.F.Check 6AX.F's competition here
LUS1.F vs MWB.DE Comparison April 2026
LUS1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUS1.F stands at 227.5M. In comparison, MWB.DE has a market cap of 25.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LUS1.F is priced at €25.20, while MWB.DE trades at €3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUS1.F currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas MWB.DE's P/E ratio is 8.10. In terms of profitability, LUS1.F's ROE is +0.40%, compared to MWB.DE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LUS1.F is more volatile compared to MWB.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUS1.F.Check MWB.DE's competition here
LUS1.F vs DFTK.DE Comparison April 2026
LUS1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUS1.F stands at 227.5M. In comparison, DFTK.DE has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LUS1.F is priced at €25.20, while DFTK.DE trades at €1.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUS1.F currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas DFTK.DE's P/E ratio is 22.50. In terms of profitability, LUS1.F's ROE is +0.40%, compared to DFTK.DE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LUS1.F is less volatile compared to DFTK.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUS1.F.Check DFTK.DE's competition here
LUS1.F vs 7111.F Comparison April 2026
LUS1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUS1.F stands at 227.5M. In comparison, 7111.F has a market cap of 11.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LUS1.F is priced at €25.20, while 7111.F trades at €0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUS1.F currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas 7111.F's P/E ratio is -1.07. In terms of profitability, LUS1.F's ROE is +0.40%, compared to 7111.F's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, LUS1.F is more volatile compared to 7111.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUS1.F.Check 7111.F's competition here
LUS1.F vs N4G.DE Comparison April 2026
LUS1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUS1.F stands at 227.5M. In comparison, N4G.DE has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LUS1.F is priced at €25.20, while N4G.DE trades at €0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUS1.F currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas N4G.DE's P/E ratio is -1.55. In terms of profitability, LUS1.F's ROE is +0.40%, compared to N4G.DE's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LUS1.F is less volatile compared to N4G.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUS1.F.Check N4G.DE's competition here
LUS1.F vs L5L.F Comparison April 2026
LUS1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUS1.F stands at 227.5M. In comparison, L5L.F has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LUS1.F is priced at €25.20, while L5L.F trades at €0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUS1.F currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas L5L.F's P/E ratio is -8.47. In terms of profitability, LUS1.F's ROE is +0.40%, compared to L5L.F's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LUS1.F is more volatile compared to L5L.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUS1.F.Check L5L.F's competition here
LUS1.F vs LUS.DE Comparison April 2026
LUS1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUS1.F stands at 227.5M. In comparison, LUS.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LUS1.F is priced at €25.20, while LUS.DE trades at €73.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUS1.F currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas LUS.DE's P/E ratio is 15.66. In terms of profitability, LUS1.F's ROE is +0.40%, compared to LUS.DE's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LUS1.F is less volatile compared to LUS.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUS1.F.Check LUS.DE's competition here