Luharuka Media & Infra Limited
Luharuka Media & Infra Limited (LUHARUKA.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LUHARUKA.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Advertising Agencies Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LUHARUKA.BO | ₹4.70 | +0.00% | 1B | 235.00 | ₹0.02 | N/A |
| AFFLE.NS | ₹1,398.50 | +0.00% | 193.1B | 43.96 | ₹31.25 | N/A |
| AFFLE.BO | ₹1,398.35 | +0.00% | 192.9B | 44.00 | ₹31.18 | N/A |
| BCG.BO | ₹11.02 | +0.00% | 21.1B | 2.41 | ₹4.34 | N/A |
| BCG.NS | ₹11.00 | +0.00% | 21.1B | 2.41 | ₹4.34 | N/A |
| SIGNPOST.NS | ₹242.54 | +0.00% | 13.4B | 26.66 | ₹9.37 | +0.20% |
| PRESSMN.NS | ₹265.00 | -0.54% | 6.2B | 161.59 | ₹1.64 | N/A |
| MAAGHADV.BO | ₹25.42 | +0.00% | 5.7B | -55.26 | -₹0.46 | N/A |
| RKSWAMY.NS | ₹99.74 | +0.00% | 5B | 25.65 | ₹3.85 | +1.52% |
| VERTOZ.NS | ₹46.53 | +0.00% | 3.9B | 9.02 | ₹5.10 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
LUHARUKA.BO vs AFFLE.NS Comparison February 2026
LUHARUKA.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUHARUKA.BO stands at 1B. In comparison, AFFLE.NS has a market cap of 193.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LUHARUKA.BO is priced at ₹4.70, while AFFLE.NS trades at ₹1,398.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUHARUKA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 235.00, whereas AFFLE.NS's P/E ratio is 43.96. In terms of profitability, LUHARUKA.BO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AFFLE.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LUHARUKA.BO is less volatile compared to AFFLE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUHARUKA.BO.Check AFFLE.NS's competition here
LUHARUKA.BO vs AFFLE.BO Comparison February 2026
LUHARUKA.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUHARUKA.BO stands at 1B. In comparison, AFFLE.BO has a market cap of 192.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LUHARUKA.BO is priced at ₹4.70, while AFFLE.BO trades at ₹1,398.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUHARUKA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 235.00, whereas AFFLE.BO's P/E ratio is 44.00. In terms of profitability, LUHARUKA.BO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AFFLE.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LUHARUKA.BO is less volatile compared to AFFLE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUHARUKA.BO.Check AFFLE.BO's competition here
LUHARUKA.BO vs BCG.BO Comparison February 2026
LUHARUKA.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUHARUKA.BO stands at 1B. In comparison, BCG.BO has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LUHARUKA.BO is priced at ₹4.70, while BCG.BO trades at ₹11.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUHARUKA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 235.00, whereas BCG.BO's P/E ratio is 2.41. In terms of profitability, LUHARUKA.BO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BCG.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LUHARUKA.BO is more volatile compared to BCG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUHARUKA.BO.Check BCG.BO's competition here
LUHARUKA.BO vs BCG.NS Comparison February 2026
LUHARUKA.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUHARUKA.BO stands at 1B. In comparison, BCG.NS has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LUHARUKA.BO is priced at ₹4.70, while BCG.NS trades at ₹11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUHARUKA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 235.00, whereas BCG.NS's P/E ratio is 2.41. In terms of profitability, LUHARUKA.BO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BCG.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LUHARUKA.BO is less volatile compared to BCG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUHARUKA.BO.Check BCG.NS's competition here
LUHARUKA.BO vs SIGNPOST.NS Comparison February 2026
LUHARUKA.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUHARUKA.BO stands at 1B. In comparison, SIGNPOST.NS has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LUHARUKA.BO is priced at ₹4.70, while SIGNPOST.NS trades at ₹242.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUHARUKA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 235.00, whereas SIGNPOST.NS's P/E ratio is 26.66. In terms of profitability, LUHARUKA.BO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SIGNPOST.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LUHARUKA.BO is less volatile compared to SIGNPOST.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUHARUKA.BO.Check SIGNPOST.NS's competition here
LUHARUKA.BO vs PRESSMN.NS Comparison February 2026
LUHARUKA.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUHARUKA.BO stands at 1B. In comparison, PRESSMN.NS has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LUHARUKA.BO is priced at ₹4.70, while PRESSMN.NS trades at ₹265.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUHARUKA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 235.00, whereas PRESSMN.NS's P/E ratio is 161.59. In terms of profitability, LUHARUKA.BO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PRESSMN.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LUHARUKA.BO is less volatile compared to PRESSMN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUHARUKA.BO.Check PRESSMN.NS's competition here
LUHARUKA.BO vs MAAGHADV.BO Comparison February 2026
LUHARUKA.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUHARUKA.BO stands at 1B. In comparison, MAAGHADV.BO has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LUHARUKA.BO is priced at ₹4.70, while MAAGHADV.BO trades at ₹25.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUHARUKA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 235.00, whereas MAAGHADV.BO's P/E ratio is -55.26. In terms of profitability, LUHARUKA.BO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MAAGHADV.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LUHARUKA.BO is more volatile compared to MAAGHADV.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUHARUKA.BO.Check MAAGHADV.BO's competition here
LUHARUKA.BO vs RKSWAMY.NS Comparison February 2026
LUHARUKA.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUHARUKA.BO stands at 1B. In comparison, RKSWAMY.NS has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, LUHARUKA.BO is priced at ₹4.70, while RKSWAMY.NS trades at ₹99.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUHARUKA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 235.00, whereas RKSWAMY.NS's P/E ratio is 25.65. In terms of profitability, LUHARUKA.BO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to RKSWAMY.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LUHARUKA.BO is less volatile compared to RKSWAMY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUHARUKA.BO.Check RKSWAMY.NS's competition here
LUHARUKA.BO vs VERTOZ.NS Comparison February 2026
LUHARUKA.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUHARUKA.BO stands at 1B. In comparison, VERTOZ.NS has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LUHARUKA.BO is priced at ₹4.70, while VERTOZ.NS trades at ₹46.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUHARUKA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 235.00, whereas VERTOZ.NS's P/E ratio is 9.02. In terms of profitability, LUHARUKA.BO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to VERTOZ.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LUHARUKA.BO is less volatile compared to VERTOZ.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUHARUKA.BO.Check VERTOZ.NS's competition here
LUHARUKA.BO vs CIL.BO Comparison February 2026
LUHARUKA.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUHARUKA.BO stands at 1B. In comparison, CIL.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LUHARUKA.BO is priced at ₹4.70, while CIL.BO trades at ₹264.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUHARUKA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 235.00, whereas CIL.BO's P/E ratio is 1391.32. In terms of profitability, LUHARUKA.BO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CIL.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LUHARUKA.BO is more volatile compared to CIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUHARUKA.BO.Check CIL.BO's competition here
LUHARUKA.BO vs TOUCHWOOD.NS Comparison February 2026
LUHARUKA.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUHARUKA.BO stands at 1B. In comparison, TOUCHWOOD.NS has a market cap of 906.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LUHARUKA.BO is priced at ₹4.70, while TOUCHWOOD.NS trades at ₹85.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUHARUKA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 235.00, whereas TOUCHWOOD.NS's P/E ratio is 14.53. In terms of profitability, LUHARUKA.BO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TOUCHWOOD.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LUHARUKA.BO is more volatile compared to TOUCHWOOD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUHARUKA.BO.Check TOUCHWOOD.NS's competition here
LUHARUKA.BO vs INNOVATUS.BO Comparison February 2026
LUHARUKA.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUHARUKA.BO stands at 1B. In comparison, INNOVATUS.BO has a market cap of 342.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LUHARUKA.BO is priced at ₹4.70, while INNOVATUS.BO trades at ₹14.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUHARUKA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 235.00, whereas INNOVATUS.BO's P/E ratio is 16.64. In terms of profitability, LUHARUKA.BO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to INNOVATUS.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LUHARUKA.BO is less volatile compared to INNOVATUS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUHARUKA.BO.Check INNOVATUS.BO's competition here
LUHARUKA.BO vs BRANDBUCKT.BO Comparison February 2026
LUHARUKA.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUHARUKA.BO stands at 1B. In comparison, BRANDBUCKT.BO has a market cap of 113.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LUHARUKA.BO is priced at ₹4.70, while BRANDBUCKT.BO trades at ₹4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUHARUKA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 235.00, whereas BRANDBUCKT.BO's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, LUHARUKA.BO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BRANDBUCKT.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LUHARUKA.BO is less volatile compared to BRANDBUCKT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUHARUKA.BO.Check BRANDBUCKT.BO's competition here
LUHARUKA.BO vs DAPS.BO Comparison February 2026
LUHARUKA.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUHARUKA.BO stands at 1B. In comparison, DAPS.BO has a market cap of 88M. Regarding current trading prices, LUHARUKA.BO is priced at ₹4.70, while DAPS.BO trades at ₹17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUHARUKA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 235.00, whereas DAPS.BO's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, LUHARUKA.BO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DAPS.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LUHARUKA.BO is more volatile compared to DAPS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUHARUKA.BO.Check DAPS.BO's competition here