Lucara Diamond Corp.
Lucara Diamond Corp. (LUCRF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LUCRF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Other Precious Metals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LUCRF | $0.21 | -1.36% | 95.7M | 1.75 | $0.12 | N/A |
| FNLPF | $54.35 | +0.00% | 42.8B | 93.60 | $0.62 | +1.52% |
| ANGPY | $16.80 | -0.18% | 29.3B | 372.40 | $0.05 | +3.07% |
| IMPUY | $19.67 | +0.00% | 18.6B | 412.60 | $0.05 | +0.46% |
| IMPUF | $17.85 | +0.00% | 16B | 357.00 | $0.05 | +0.53% |
| MMSMY | $44.00 | +0.00% | 13.6B | 44.91 | $1.06 | +0.39% |
| JINFF | $26.15 | +1.44% | 10.4B | 25.39 | $1.03 | +0.31% |
| GMINF | $38.10 | +0.00% | 8.6B | 33.24 | $1.13 | N/A |
| XZJCF | $130.42 | +0.00% | 7.5B | 24.70 | $5.28 | +0.98% |
| OICT | $11.25 | -2.17% | 6.2B | -38.40 | -$0.29 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
LUCRF vs FNLPF Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, FNLPF has a market cap of 42.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while FNLPF trades at $54.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas FNLPF's P/E ratio is 93.60. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FNLPF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF is less volatile compared to FNLPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCRF.Check FNLPF's competition here
LUCRF vs ANGPY Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, ANGPY has a market cap of 29.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while ANGPY trades at $16.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas ANGPY's P/E ratio is 372.40. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ANGPY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF is less volatile compared to ANGPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCRF.Check ANGPY's competition here
LUCRF vs IMPUY Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, IMPUY has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while IMPUY trades at $19.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas IMPUY's P/E ratio is 412.60. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IMPUY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF is less volatile compared to IMPUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCRF.Check IMPUY's competition here
LUCRF vs IMPUF Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, IMPUF has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while IMPUF trades at $17.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas IMPUF's P/E ratio is 357.00. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IMPUF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF and IMPUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IMPUF's competition here
LUCRF vs MMSMY Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, MMSMY has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while MMSMY trades at $44.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas MMSMY's P/E ratio is 44.91. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MMSMY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF and MMSMY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MMSMY's competition here
LUCRF vs JINFF Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, JINFF has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while JINFF trades at $26.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas JINFF's P/E ratio is 25.39. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to JINFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF is less volatile compared to JINFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCRF.Check JINFF's competition here
LUCRF vs GMINF Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, GMINF has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while GMINF trades at $38.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas GMINF's P/E ratio is 33.24. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GMINF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF is less volatile compared to GMINF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCRF.Check GMINF's competition here
LUCRF vs XZJCF Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, XZJCF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while XZJCF trades at $130.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas XZJCF's P/E ratio is 24.70. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to XZJCF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF and XZJCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check XZJCF's competition here
LUCRF vs OICT Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, OICT has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while OICT trades at $11.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas OICT's P/E ratio is -38.40. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OICT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF and OICT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OICT's competition here
LUCRF vs NMPNF Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, NMPNF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while NMPNF trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas NMPNF's P/E ratio is 5.83. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NMPNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF and NMPNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NMPNF's competition here
LUCRF vs ABBRF Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, ABBRF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while ABBRF trades at $12.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas ABBRF's P/E ratio is -111.38. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ABBRF's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF is less volatile compared to ABBRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCRF.Check ABBRF's competition here
LUCRF vs ZMPLF Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, ZMPLF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while ZMPLF trades at $14.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas ZMPLF's P/E ratio is 38.21. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ZMPLF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF and ZMPLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ZMPLF's competition here
LUCRF vs POYYF Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, POYYF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while POYYF trades at $3.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas POYYF's P/E ratio is -5.07. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to POYYF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF and POYYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check POYYF's competition here
LUCRF vs GLGDF Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, GLGDF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while GLGDF trades at $2.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas GLGDF's P/E ratio is 33.13. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GLGDF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF is less volatile compared to GLGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCRF.Check GLGDF's competition here
LUCRF vs AUCOY Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, AUCOY has a market cap of 899.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while AUCOY trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas AUCOY's P/E ratio is 4.04. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AUCOY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF is less volatile compared to AUCOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCRF.Check AUCOY's competition here
LUCRF vs TIHRF Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, TIHRF has a market cap of 591.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while TIHRF trades at $1.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas TIHRF's P/E ratio is 7.74. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TIHRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF and TIHRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TIHRF's competition here
LUCRF vs FCSUF Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, FCSUF has a market cap of 578.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while FCSUF trades at $2.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas FCSUF's P/E ratio is 18.36. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FCSUF's ROE of +1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF and FCSUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FCSUF's competition here
LUCRF vs BKRRF Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, BKRRF has a market cap of 483.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while BKRRF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas BKRRF's P/E ratio is -23.32. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BKRRF's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF is less volatile compared to BKRRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCRF.Check BKRRF's competition here
LUCRF vs SAPLF Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, SAPLF has a market cap of 452.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while SAPLF trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas SAPLF's P/E ratio is 21.75. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SAPLF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF is less volatile compared to SAPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCRF.Check SAPLF's competition here
LUCRF vs BRVMF Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, BRVMF has a market cap of 376.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while BRVMF trades at $3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas BRVMF's P/E ratio is -113.67. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BRVMF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF is less volatile compared to BRVMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCRF.Check BRVMF's competition here
LUCRF vs SLVTF Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, SLVTF has a market cap of 366.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while SLVTF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas SLVTF's P/E ratio is -72.00. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SLVTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF is less volatile compared to SLVTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCRF.Check SLVTF's competition here
LUCRF vs IAUFF Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, IAUFF has a market cap of 354.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while IAUFF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas IAUFF's P/E ratio is 22.20. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IAUFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF and IAUFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IAUFF's competition here
LUCRF vs TPRFF Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, TPRFF has a market cap of 332M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while TPRFF trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas TPRFF's P/E ratio is -4.48. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TPRFF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF is less volatile compared to TPRFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCRF.Check TPRFF's competition here
LUCRF vs HGLD Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, HGLD has a market cap of 297.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while HGLD trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas HGLD's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HGLD's ROE of -4.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF is less volatile compared to HGLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCRF.Check HGLD's competition here
LUCRF vs GOTRF Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, GOTRF has a market cap of 295.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while GOTRF trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas GOTRF's P/E ratio is -13.23. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GOTRF's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF is less volatile compared to GOTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCRF.Check GOTRF's competition here
LUCRF vs SMDRF Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, SMDRF has a market cap of 260.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while SMDRF trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas SMDRF's P/E ratio is -162.80. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SMDRF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF is less volatile compared to SMDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCRF.Check SMDRF's competition here
LUCRF vs PAASF Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, PAASF has a market cap of 242.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while PAASF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas PAASF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PAASF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF is less volatile compared to PAASF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCRF.Check PAASF's competition here
LUCRF vs CHPGF Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, CHPGF has a market cap of 238.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while CHPGF trades at $3.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas CHPGF's P/E ratio is -77.50. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CHPGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF is less volatile compared to CHPGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCRF.Check CHPGF's competition here
LUCRF vs SSVFF Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, SSVFF has a market cap of 233.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while SSVFF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas SSVFF's P/E ratio is -29.00. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SSVFF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF is less volatile compared to SSVFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCRF.Check SSVFF's competition here
LUCRF vs ORVMF Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, ORVMF has a market cap of 199.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while ORVMF trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas ORVMF's P/E ratio is -9.73. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ORVMF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF is less volatile compared to ORVMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCRF.Check ORVMF's competition here
LUCRF vs CAPTF Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, CAPTF has a market cap of 184.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while CAPTF trades at $1.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas CAPTF's P/E ratio is -168.00. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CAPTF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF is less volatile compared to CAPTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCRF.Check CAPTF's competition here
LUCRF vs TBXXF Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, TBXXF has a market cap of 166M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while TBXXF trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas TBXXF's P/E ratio is -19.98. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TBXXF's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF is less volatile compared to TBXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCRF.Check TBXXF's competition here
LUCRF vs BOCOF Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, BOCOF has a market cap of 160.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while BOCOF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas BOCOF's P/E ratio is -40.00. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BOCOF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF and BOCOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BOCOF's competition here
LUCRF vs PLLHF Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, PLLHF has a market cap of 155.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while PLLHF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas PLLHF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PLLHF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF and PLLHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PLLHF's competition here
LUCRF vs SNNGF Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, SNNGF has a market cap of 154.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while SNNGF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas SNNGF's P/E ratio is -7.68. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SNNGF's ROE of +4.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF and SNNGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SNNGF's competition here
LUCRF vs XANAF Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, XANAF has a market cap of 137.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while XANAF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas XANAF's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to XANAF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF and XANAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check XANAF's competition here
LUCRF vs OCGSF Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, OCGSF has a market cap of 133.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while OCGSF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas OCGSF's P/E ratio is -8.85. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OCGSF's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF is less volatile compared to OCGSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCRF.Check OCGSF's competition here
LUCRF vs AGLDF Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, AGLDF has a market cap of 127.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while AGLDF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas AGLDF's P/E ratio is -9.56. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AGLDF's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF is less volatile compared to AGLDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCRF.Check AGLDF's competition here
LUCRF vs NAUFF Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, NAUFF has a market cap of 127.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while NAUFF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas NAUFF's P/E ratio is -24.01. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NAUFF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF is less volatile compared to NAUFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCRF.Check NAUFF's competition here
LUCRF vs SCTSF Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, SCTSF has a market cap of 120M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while SCTSF trades at $2.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas SCTSF's P/E ratio is -10.45. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SCTSF's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF is less volatile compared to SCTSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCRF.Check SCTSF's competition here
LUCRF vs SDRC Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, SDRC has a market cap of 113M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while SDRC trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas SDRC's P/E ratio is -300.10. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SDRC's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF is less volatile compared to SDRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCRF.Check SDRC's competition here
LUCRF vs EMPYF Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, EMPYF has a market cap of 111.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while EMPYF trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas EMPYF's P/E ratio is 29.07. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EMPYF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF is less volatile compared to EMPYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCRF.Check EMPYF's competition here
LUCRF vs LGCXF Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, LGCXF has a market cap of 111.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while LGCXF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas LGCXF's P/E ratio is -31.78. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LGCXF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF is less volatile compared to LGCXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCRF.Check LGCXF's competition here
LUCRF vs ACRG Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, ACRG has a market cap of 111.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while ACRG trades at $7.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas ACRG's P/E ratio is -17.76. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ACRG's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF and ACRG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ACRG's competition here
LUCRF vs ELRFF Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, ELRFF has a market cap of 107.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while ELRFF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas ELRFF's P/E ratio is -4.82. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ELRFF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF is less volatile compared to ELRFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCRF.Check ELRFF's competition here
LUCRF vs CTNXF Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, CTNXF has a market cap of 105.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while CTNXF trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas CTNXF's P/E ratio is -17.88. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CTNXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF is less volatile compared to CTNXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCRF.Check CTNXF's competition here
LUCRF vs AMNP Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, AMNP has a market cap of 105.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while AMNP trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas AMNP's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AMNP's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF is less volatile compared to AMNP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCRF.Check AMNP's competition here
LUCRF vs PGLDF Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, PGLDF has a market cap of 105.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while PGLDF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas PGLDF's P/E ratio is 34.00. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PGLDF's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF is less volatile compared to PGLDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCRF.Check PGLDF's competition here
LUCRF vs TEUTF Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, TEUTF has a market cap of 104.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while TEUTF trades at $1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas TEUTF's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TEUTF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF is less volatile compared to TEUTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCRF.Check TEUTF's competition here
LUCRF vs TSORF Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, TSORF has a market cap of 97.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while TSORF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas TSORF's P/E ratio is -92.86. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TSORF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF is less volatile compared to TSORF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCRF.Check TSORF's competition here
LUCRF vs DNCVF Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, DNCVF has a market cap of 93.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while DNCVF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas DNCVF's P/E ratio is -25.80. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DNCVF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF is less volatile compared to DNCVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCRF.Check DNCVF's competition here
LUCRF vs THMG Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, THMG has a market cap of 84.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while THMG trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas THMG's P/E ratio is -45.50. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to THMG's ROE of +8.97%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF is less volatile compared to THMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCRF.Check THMG's competition here
LUCRF vs AGMRF Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, AGMRF has a market cap of 82.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while AGMRF trades at $3.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas AGMRF's P/E ratio is -6.51. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AGMRF's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF is less volatile compared to AGMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCRF.Check AGMRF's competition here
LUCRF vs VIPRF Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, VIPRF has a market cap of 81.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while VIPRF trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas VIPRF's P/E ratio is -8.43. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VIPRF's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF is less volatile compared to VIPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCRF.Check VIPRF's competition here
LUCRF vs LBCMF Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, LBCMF has a market cap of 78.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while LBCMF trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas LBCMF's P/E ratio is -4.49. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LBCMF's ROE of -5.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF is less volatile compared to LBCMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCRF.Check LBCMF's competition here
LUCRF vs KDKCF Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, KDKCF has a market cap of 75M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while KDKCF trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas KDKCF's P/E ratio is -78.50. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KDKCF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF is less volatile compared to KDKCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCRF.Check KDKCF's competition here
LUCRF vs EQMEF Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, EQMEF has a market cap of 70.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while EQMEF trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas EQMEF's P/E ratio is -35.73. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EQMEF's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF is less volatile compared to EQMEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCRF.Check EQMEF's competition here
LUCRF vs HEGLF Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, HEGLF has a market cap of 68.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while HEGLF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas HEGLF's P/E ratio is -2.23. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HEGLF's ROE of -7.48%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF and HEGLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HEGLF's competition here
LUCRF vs ARRKF Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, ARRKF has a market cap of 65M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while ARRKF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas ARRKF's P/E ratio is -4.91. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ARRKF's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF is less volatile compared to ARRKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCRF.Check ARRKF's competition here
LUCRF vs VLMGF Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, VLMGF has a market cap of 64.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while VLMGF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas VLMGF's P/E ratio is -56.87. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VLMGF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF is less volatile compared to VLMGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCRF.Check VLMGF's competition here
LUCRF vs MMNGF Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, MMNGF has a market cap of 64M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while MMNGF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas MMNGF's P/E ratio is -30.12. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MMNGF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF is less volatile compared to MMNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCRF.Check MMNGF's competition here
LUCRF vs BBBXF Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, BBBXF has a market cap of 63.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while BBBXF trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas BBBXF's P/E ratio is -5.97. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BBBXF's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF is less volatile compared to BBBXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCRF.Check BBBXF's competition here
LUCRF vs BRGC Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, BRGC has a market cap of 59.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while BRGC trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas BRGC's P/E ratio is 0.07. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BRGC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF is less volatile compared to BRGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCRF.Check BRGC's competition here
LUCRF vs CPPMF Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, CPPMF has a market cap of 58.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while CPPMF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas CPPMF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CPPMF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF is less volatile compared to CPPMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCRF.Check CPPMF's competition here
LUCRF vs SMOFF Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, SMOFF has a market cap of 55M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while SMOFF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas SMOFF's P/E ratio is -10.58. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SMOFF's ROE of -5.71%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF is less volatile compared to SMOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCRF.Check SMOFF's competition here
LUCRF vs DNRSF Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, DNRSF has a market cap of 54.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while DNRSF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas DNRSF's P/E ratio is -4.75. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DNRSF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF is less volatile compared to DNRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCRF.Check DNRSF's competition here
LUCRF vs ACKRF Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, ACKRF has a market cap of 54.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while ACKRF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas ACKRF's P/E ratio is 11.40. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ACKRF's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF is less volatile compared to ACKRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCRF.Check ACKRF's competition here
LUCRF vs PDLMF Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, PDLMF has a market cap of 52.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while PDLMF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas PDLMF's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PDLMF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF and PDLMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PDLMF's competition here
LUCRF vs EMPPF Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, EMPPF has a market cap of 52.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while EMPPF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas EMPPF's P/E ratio is -14.45. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EMPPF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF and EMPPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EMPPF's competition here
LUCRF vs VTXXF Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, VTXXF has a market cap of 52M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while VTXXF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas VTXXF's P/E ratio is -7.03. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VTXXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF and VTXXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VTXXF's competition here
LUCRF vs CTMCF Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, CTMCF has a market cap of 51.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while CTMCF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas CTMCF's P/E ratio is -14.30. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CTMCF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF is less volatile compared to CTMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCRF.Check CTMCF's competition here
LUCRF vs ATEPF Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, ATEPF has a market cap of 51.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while ATEPF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas ATEPF's P/E ratio is -22.00. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ATEPF's ROE of -2.57%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF is less volatile compared to ATEPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCRF.Check ATEPF's competition here
LUCRF vs KGFMF Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, KGFMF has a market cap of 46.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while KGFMF trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas KGFMF's P/E ratio is -52.01. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KGFMF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF is less volatile compared to KGFMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCRF.Check KGFMF's competition here
LUCRF vs ADYRF Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, ADYRF has a market cap of 43.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while ADYRF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas ADYRF's P/E ratio is -8.50. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ADYRF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF and ADYRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ADYRF's competition here
LUCRF vs DYNR Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, DYNR has a market cap of 42.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while DYNR trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas DYNR's P/E ratio is 16.22. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DYNR's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF and DYNR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DYNR's competition here
LUCRF vs RKHNF Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, RKHNF has a market cap of 41M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while RKHNF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas RKHNF's P/E ratio is -14.00. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RKHNF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF and RKHNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RKHNF's competition here
LUCRF vs PVGDF Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, PVGDF has a market cap of 39.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while PVGDF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas PVGDF's P/E ratio is -22.60. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PVGDF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF is less volatile compared to PVGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCRF.Check PVGDF's competition here
LUCRF vs SSVRF Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, SSVRF has a market cap of 38.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while SSVRF trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas SSVRF's P/E ratio is -15.60. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SSVRF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF is less volatile compared to SSVRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCRF.Check SSVRF's competition here
LUCRF vs PNTRF Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, PNTRF has a market cap of 36.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while PNTRF trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas PNTRF's P/E ratio is -55.00. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PNTRF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF and PNTRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PNTRF's competition here
LUCRF vs HMRRF Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, HMRRF has a market cap of 35.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while HMRRF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas HMRRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HMRRF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF and HMRRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HMRRF's competition here
LUCRF vs MRZLF Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, MRZLF has a market cap of 35.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while MRZLF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas MRZLF's P/E ratio is -4.41. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MRZLF's ROE of -8.57%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF is less volatile compared to MRZLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCRF.Check MRZLF's competition here
LUCRF vs CJIMF Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, CJIMF has a market cap of 35M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while CJIMF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas CJIMF's P/E ratio is -68.00. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CJIMF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF and CJIMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CJIMF's competition here
LUCRF vs WEXPF Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, WEXPF has a market cap of 34.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while WEXPF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas WEXPF's P/E ratio is -6.52. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WEXPF's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF is less volatile compared to WEXPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCRF.Check WEXPF's competition here
LUCRF vs RITE Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, RITE has a market cap of 32.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while RITE trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas RITE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RITE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF is less volatile compared to RITE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCRF.Check RITE's competition here
LUCRF vs OKPRF Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, OKPRF has a market cap of 31.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while OKPRF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas OKPRF's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OKPRF's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF is less volatile compared to OKPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCRF.Check OKPRF's competition here
LUCRF vs WAMFF Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, WAMFF has a market cap of 31.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while WAMFF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas WAMFF's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WAMFF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF is less volatile compared to WAMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCRF.Check WAMFF's competition here
LUCRF vs TLSMF Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, TLSMF has a market cap of 30.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while TLSMF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas TLSMF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TLSMF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF and TLSMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TLSMF's competition here
LUCRF vs ZLME Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, ZLME has a market cap of 29.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while ZLME trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas ZLME's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ZLME's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUCRF has daily volatility of 0.00 and ZLME has daily volatility of N/A.Check ZLME's competition here
LUCRF vs SUNPF Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, SUNPF has a market cap of 27.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while SUNPF trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas SUNPF's P/E ratio is -31.40. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SUNPF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF is less volatile compared to SUNPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCRF.Check SUNPF's competition here
LUCRF vs ESGLF Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, ESGLF has a market cap of 26.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while ESGLF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas ESGLF's P/E ratio is -9.85. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ESGLF's ROE of +2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF is less volatile compared to ESGLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCRF.Check ESGLF's competition here
LUCRF vs GLDRF Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, GLDRF has a market cap of 25.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while GLDRF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas GLDRF's P/E ratio is -6.25. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GLDRF's ROE of -17.55%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF is less volatile compared to GLDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCRF.Check GLDRF's competition here
LUCRF vs ASLRF Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, ASLRF has a market cap of 25M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while ASLRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas ASLRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ASLRF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF and ASLRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ASLRF's competition here
LUCRF vs SBMCF Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, SBMCF has a market cap of 23.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while SBMCF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas SBMCF's P/E ratio is -3.35. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SBMCF's ROE of -22.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF is less volatile compared to SBMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCRF.Check SBMCF's competition here
LUCRF vs STRFF Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, STRFF has a market cap of 23.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while STRFF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas STRFF's P/E ratio is -1.01. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to STRFF's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF is less volatile compared to STRFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCRF.Check STRFF's competition here
LUCRF vs SHGDF Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, SHGDF has a market cap of 23.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while SHGDF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas SHGDF's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SHGDF's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF and SHGDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SHGDF's competition here
LUCRF vs URVNF Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, URVNF has a market cap of 20.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while URVNF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas URVNF's P/E ratio is 43.33. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to URVNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF is less volatile compared to URVNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCRF.Check URVNF's competition here
LUCRF vs PLLMF Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, PLLMF has a market cap of 20.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while PLLMF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas PLLMF's P/E ratio is 3.90. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PLLMF's ROE of +1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF is less volatile compared to PLLMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCRF.Check PLLMF's competition here
LUCRF vs AUCUF Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, AUCUF has a market cap of 20.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while AUCUF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas AUCUF's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AUCUF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF is less volatile compared to AUCUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCRF.Check AUCUF's competition here
LUCRF vs HBEIF Comparison February 2026
LUCRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCRF stands at 95.7M. In comparison, HBEIF has a market cap of 19.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCRF is priced at $0.21, while HBEIF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCRF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.75, whereas HBEIF's P/E ratio is -4.17. In terms of profitability, LUCRF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HBEIF's ROE of -4.99%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCRF is less volatile compared to HBEIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCRF.Check HBEIF's competition here