LT Foods Limited

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, NESTLEIND.BO has a market cap of 2.3T. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while NESTLEIND.BO trades at ₹1,194.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas NESTLEIND.BO's P/E ratio is 70.54. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NESTLEIND.BO's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is more volatile compared to NESTLEIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check NESTLEIND.BO's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, NESTLEIND.NS has a market cap of 2.3T. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while NESTLEIND.NS trades at ₹1,193.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas NESTLEIND.NS's P/E ratio is 70.77. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NESTLEIND.NS's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is more volatile compared to NESTLEIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check NESTLEIND.NS's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, BRITANNIA.BO has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while BRITANNIA.BO trades at ₹5,500.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas BRITANNIA.BO's P/E ratio is 57.06. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BRITANNIA.BO's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is more volatile compared to BRITANNIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check BRITANNIA.BO's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, BRITANNIA.NS has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while BRITANNIA.NS trades at ₹5,500.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas BRITANNIA.NS's P/E ratio is 54.72. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BRITANNIA.NS's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is more volatile compared to BRITANNIA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check BRITANNIA.NS's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, TATACONSUM.NS has a market cap of 1T. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while TATACONSUM.NS trades at ₹1,048.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas TATACONSUM.NS's P/E ratio is 70.89. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TATACONSUM.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is more volatile compared to TATACONSUM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check TATACONSUM.NS's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, TATACONSUM.BO has a market cap of 1T. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while TATACONSUM.BO trades at ₹1,048.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas TATACONSUM.BO's P/E ratio is 70.87. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TATACONSUM.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is more volatile compared to TATACONSUM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check TATACONSUM.BO's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, PATANJALI.NS has a market cap of 518.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while PATANJALI.NS trades at ₹476.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas PATANJALI.NS's P/E ratio is 31.39. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PATANJALI.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is more volatile compared to PATANJALI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check PATANJALI.NS's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, PATANJALI.BO has a market cap of 517.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while PATANJALI.BO trades at ₹475.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas PATANJALI.BO's P/E ratio is 31.39. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PATANJALI.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is more volatile compared to PATANJALI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check PATANJALI.BO's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, AWL.BO has a market cap of 240.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while AWL.BO trades at ₹185.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas AWL.BO's P/E ratio is 25.50. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AWL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is less volatile compared to AWL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check AWL.BO's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, HATSUN.BO has a market cap of 206.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while HATSUN.BO trades at ₹926.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas HATSUN.BO's P/E ratio is 59.38. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HATSUN.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is less volatile compared to HATSUN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check HATSUN.BO's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, HATSUN.NS has a market cap of 205.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while HATSUN.NS trades at ₹923.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas HATSUN.NS's P/E ratio is 59.10. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HATSUN.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is less volatile compared to HATSUN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check HATSUN.NS's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, AVANTIFEED.BO has a market cap of 164.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while AVANTIFEED.BO trades at ₹1,210.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas AVANTIFEED.BO's P/E ratio is 21.44. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AVANTIFEED.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is less volatile compared to AVANTIFEED.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check AVANTIFEED.BO's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, AVANTIFEED.NS has a market cap of 164.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while AVANTIFEED.NS trades at ₹1,208.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas AVANTIFEED.NS's P/E ratio is 21.40. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AVANTIFEED.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is less volatile compared to AVANTIFEED.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check AVANTIFEED.NS's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, BIKAJI.BO has a market cap of 154.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while BIKAJI.BO trades at ₹617.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas BIKAJI.BO's P/E ratio is 62.75. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BIKAJI.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is more volatile compared to BIKAJI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check BIKAJI.BO's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, BIKAJI.NS has a market cap of 154.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while BIKAJI.NS trades at ₹617.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas BIKAJI.NS's P/E ratio is 62.58. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BIKAJI.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is more volatile compared to BIKAJI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check BIKAJI.NS's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, CCL.NS has a market cap of 141B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while CCL.NS trades at ₹1,058.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas CCL.NS's P/E ratio is 37.64. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CCL.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is more volatile compared to CCL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check CCL.NS's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, CCL.BO has a market cap of 140.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while CCL.BO trades at ₹1,057.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas CCL.BO's P/E ratio is 37.56. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CCL.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is less volatile compared to CCL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check CCL.BO's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, LTFOODS.BO has a market cap of 129.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while LTFOODS.BO trades at ₹371.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas LTFOODS.BO's P/E ratio is 19.86. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LTFOODS.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is more volatile compared to LTFOODS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check LTFOODS.BO's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, BBTC.BO has a market cap of 96B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while BBTC.BO trades at ₹1,375.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas BBTC.BO's P/E ratio is 8.49. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BBTC.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is less volatile compared to BBTC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check BBTC.BO's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, BBTC.NS has a market cap of 95.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while BBTC.NS trades at ₹1,375.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas BBTC.NS's P/E ratio is 8.67. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BBTC.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is less volatile compared to BBTC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check BBTC.NS's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, ORKLAINDIA.NS has a market cap of 81.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while ORKLAINDIA.NS trades at ₹591.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas ORKLAINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 32.74. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ORKLAINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is more volatile compared to ORKLAINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check ORKLAINDIA.NS's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, MANORAMA.BO has a market cap of 72.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while MANORAMA.BO trades at ₹1,210.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas MANORAMA.BO's P/E ratio is 34.06. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MANORAMA.BO's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is less volatile compared to MANORAMA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check MANORAMA.BO's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, MANORAMA.NS has a market cap of 72.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while MANORAMA.NS trades at ₹1,208.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas MANORAMA.NS's P/E ratio is 33.95. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MANORAMA.NS's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is less volatile compared to MANORAMA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check MANORAMA.NS's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, KRBL.BO has a market cap of 67.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while KRBL.BO trades at ₹294.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas KRBL.BO's P/E ratio is 10.42. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KRBL.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is less volatile compared to KRBL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check KRBL.BO's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, KRBL.NS has a market cap of 67.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while KRBL.NS trades at ₹294.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas KRBL.NS's P/E ratio is 10.41. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KRBL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is less volatile compared to KRBL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check KRBL.NS's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, DAAWAT.NS has a market cap of 65.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while DAAWAT.NS trades at ₹189.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas DAAWAT.NS's P/E ratio is 12.32. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DAAWAT.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is less volatile compared to DAAWAT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check DAAWAT.NS's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, TATACOFFEE.BO has a market cap of 64.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while TATACOFFEE.BO trades at ₹344.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas TATACOFFEE.BO's P/E ratio is 35.84. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TATACOFFEE.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is less volatile compared to TATACOFFEE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check TATACOFFEE.BO's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, TATACOFFEE.NS has a market cap of 62.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while TATACOFFEE.NS trades at ₹334.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas TATACOFFEE.NS's P/E ratio is 34.79. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TATACOFFEE.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LTFOODS.NS has daily volatility of 3.34 and TATACOFFEE.NS has daily volatility of N/A.Check TATACOFFEE.NS's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, GAEL.NS has a market cap of 61.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while GAEL.NS trades at ₹134.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas GAEL.NS's P/E ratio is 30.67. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GAEL.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is less volatile compared to GAEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check GAEL.NS's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, GAEL.BO has a market cap of 61.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while GAEL.BO trades at ₹134.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas GAEL.BO's P/E ratio is 30.59. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GAEL.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is more volatile compared to GAEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check GAEL.BO's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, HNDFDS.NS has a market cap of 60.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while HNDFDS.NS trades at ₹508.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas HNDFDS.NS's P/E ratio is 44.38. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HNDFDS.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is less volatile compared to HNDFDS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check HNDFDS.NS's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, HNDFDS.BO has a market cap of 60.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while HNDFDS.BO trades at ₹507.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas HNDFDS.BO's P/E ratio is 44.26. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HNDFDS.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is less volatile compared to HNDFDS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check HNDFDS.BO's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, BECTORFOOD.NS has a market cap of 55.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while BECTORFOOD.NS trades at ₹181.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas BECTORFOOD.NS's P/E ratio is 39.85. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BECTORFOOD.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is less volatile compared to BECTORFOOD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check BECTORFOOD.NS's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, BECTORFOOD.BO has a market cap of 55.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while BECTORFOOD.BO trades at ₹181.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas BECTORFOOD.BO's P/E ratio is 39.84. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BECTORFOOD.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is less volatile compared to BECTORFOOD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check BECTORFOOD.BO's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, TASTYBIT.BO has a market cap of 36.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while TASTYBIT.BO trades at ₹14,140.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas TASTYBIT.BO's P/E ratio is 105.07. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TASTYBIT.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is less volatile compared to TASTYBIT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check TASTYBIT.BO's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, GOPAL.NS has a market cap of 31.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while GOPAL.NS trades at ₹251.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas GOPAL.NS's P/E ratio is 784.84. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GOPAL.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is less volatile compared to GOPAL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check GOPAL.NS's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, VADILALIND.NS has a market cap of 30.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while VADILALIND.NS trades at ₹4,291.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas VADILALIND.NS's P/E ratio is 25.25. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VADILALIND.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is less volatile compared to VADILALIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check VADILALIND.NS's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, VADILALIND.BO has a market cap of 30.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while VADILALIND.BO trades at ₹4,286.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas VADILALIND.BO's P/E ratio is 25.22. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VADILALIND.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is less volatile compared to VADILALIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check VADILALIND.BO's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, ATFL.NS has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while ATFL.NS trades at ₹785.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas ATFL.NS's P/E ratio is 344.56. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ATFL.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is less volatile compared to ATFL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check ATFL.NS's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, ATFL.BO has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while ATFL.BO trades at ₹784.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas ATFL.BO's P/E ratio is 342.53. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ATFL.BO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is more volatile compared to ATFL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check ATFL.BO's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, ZYDUSWELL.NS has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while ZYDUSWELL.NS trades at ₹446.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas ZYDUSWELL.NS's P/E ratio is 68.63. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ZYDUSWELL.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is less volatile compared to ZYDUSWELL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check ZYDUSWELL.NS's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, ZYDUSWELL.BO has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while ZYDUSWELL.BO trades at ₹446.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas ZYDUSWELL.BO's P/E ratio is 68.41. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ZYDUSWELL.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is less volatile compared to ZYDUSWELL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check ZYDUSWELL.BO's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, HERITGFOOD.BO has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while HERITGFOOD.BO trades at ₹304.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas HERITGFOOD.BO's P/E ratio is 17.25. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HERITGFOOD.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is less volatile compared to HERITGFOOD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check HERITGFOOD.BO's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, HERITGFOOD.NS has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while HERITGFOOD.NS trades at ₹304.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas HERITGFOOD.NS's P/E ratio is 17.24. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HERITGFOOD.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is less volatile compared to HERITGFOOD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check HERITGFOOD.NS's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, GRMOVER.BO has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while GRMOVER.BO trades at ₹153.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas GRMOVER.BO's P/E ratio is 48.14. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GRMOVER.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is more volatile compared to GRMOVER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check GRMOVER.BO's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, GRMOVER.NS has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while GRMOVER.NS trades at ₹152.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas GRMOVER.NS's P/E ratio is 48.22. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GRMOVER.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is more volatile compared to GRMOVER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check GRMOVER.NS's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, GOKULAGRO.NS has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while GOKULAGRO.NS trades at ₹184.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas GOKULAGRO.NS's P/E ratio is 18.18. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GOKULAGRO.NS's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is less volatile compared to GOKULAGRO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check GOKULAGRO.NS's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, GOKULAGRO.BO has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while GOKULAGRO.BO trades at ₹183.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas GOKULAGRO.BO's P/E ratio is 18.13. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GOKULAGRO.BO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is less volatile compared to GOKULAGRO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check GOKULAGRO.BO's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, DFMFOODS.NS has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while DFMFOODS.NS trades at ₹461.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas DFMFOODS.NS's P/E ratio is -47.58. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DFMFOODS.NS's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is more volatile compared to DFMFOODS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check DFMFOODS.NS's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, PARAGMILK.NS has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while PARAGMILK.NS trades at ₹190.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas PARAGMILK.NS's P/E ratio is 18.72. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PARAGMILK.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is less volatile compared to PARAGMILK.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check PARAGMILK.NS's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, PARAGMILK.BO has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while PARAGMILK.BO trades at ₹190.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas PARAGMILK.BO's P/E ratio is 18.70. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PARAGMILK.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is less volatile compared to PARAGMILK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check PARAGMILK.BO's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, SUNDROP.NS has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while SUNDROP.NS trades at ₹591.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas SUNDROP.NS's P/E ratio is -14.53. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SUNDROP.NS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is less volatile compared to SUNDROP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check SUNDROP.NS's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, DIAMONDYD.NS has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while DIAMONDYD.NS trades at ₹931.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas DIAMONDYD.NS's P/E ratio is -642.62. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DIAMONDYD.NS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is less volatile compared to DIAMONDYD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check DIAMONDYD.NS's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, SUNDROP.BO has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while SUNDROP.BO trades at ₹590.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas SUNDROP.BO's P/E ratio is -14.51. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SUNDROP.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is less volatile compared to SUNDROP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check SUNDROP.BO's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, DIAMONDYD.BO has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while DIAMONDYD.BO trades at ₹931.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas DIAMONDYD.BO's P/E ratio is -637.95. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DIAMONDYD.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is less volatile compared to DIAMONDYD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check DIAMONDYD.BO's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, BNAGROCHEM.BO has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while BNAGROCHEM.BO trades at ₹217.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas BNAGROCHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 21.67. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BNAGROCHEM.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is less volatile compared to BNAGROCHEM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check BNAGROCHEM.BO's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, TASTYBITE.NS has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while TASTYBITE.NS trades at ₹6,804.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas TASTYBITE.NS's P/E ratio is 49.11. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TASTYBITE.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is less volatile compared to TASTYBITE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check TASTYBITE.NS's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, ADFFOODS.BO has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while ADFFOODS.BO trades at ₹158.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas ADFFOODS.BO's P/E ratio is 21.66. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ADFFOODS.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is less volatile compared to ADFFOODS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check ADFFOODS.BO's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, ADFFOODS.NS has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while ADFFOODS.NS trades at ₹157.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas ADFFOODS.NS's P/E ratio is 21.57. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ADFFOODS.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is less volatile compared to ADFFOODS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check ADFFOODS.NS's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, HMAAGRO.BO has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while HMAAGRO.BO trades at ₹22.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas HMAAGRO.BO's P/E ratio is 6.66. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HMAAGRO.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is less volatile compared to HMAAGRO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check HMAAGRO.BO's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, HMAAGRO.NS has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while HMAAGRO.NS trades at ₹22.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas HMAAGRO.NS's P/E ratio is 6.66. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HMAAGRO.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is less volatile compared to HMAAGRO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check HMAAGRO.NS's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, CLSEL.BO has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while CLSEL.BO trades at ₹217.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas CLSEL.BO's P/E ratio is 10.71. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CLSEL.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is less volatile compared to CLSEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check CLSEL.BO's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, CLSEL.NS has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while CLSEL.NS trades at ₹216.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas CLSEL.NS's P/E ratio is 10.67. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CLSEL.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is less volatile compared to CLSEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check CLSEL.NS's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, SKMEGGPROD.BO has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while SKMEGGPROD.BO trades at ₹157.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas SKMEGGPROD.BO's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SKMEGGPROD.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is less volatile compared to SKMEGGPROD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check SKMEGGPROD.BO's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, SKMEGGPROD.NS has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while SKMEGGPROD.NS trades at ₹156.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas SKMEGGPROD.NS's P/E ratio is 10.63. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SKMEGGPROD.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is less volatile compared to SKMEGGPROD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check SKMEGGPROD.NS's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, KRISHIVAL.NS has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while KRISHIVAL.NS trades at ₹316.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas KRISHIVAL.NS's P/E ratio is 36.82. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KRISHIVAL.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is more volatile compared to KRISHIVAL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check KRISHIVAL.NS's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, REGAAL.NS has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while REGAAL.NS trades at ₹64.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas REGAAL.NS's P/E ratio is 13.12. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to REGAAL.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is less volatile compared to REGAAL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check REGAAL.NS's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, MUKKA.NS has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while MUKKA.NS trades at ₹19.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas MUKKA.NS's P/E ratio is 13.23. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MUKKA.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is less volatile compared to MUKKA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check MUKKA.NS's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, EIFFL.NS has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while EIFFL.NS trades at ₹216.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas EIFFL.NS's P/E ratio is 95.48. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EIFFL.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is less volatile compared to EIFFL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check EIFFL.NS's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, GOKUL.BO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while GOKUL.BO trades at ₹38.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas GOKUL.BO's P/E ratio is 19.59. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GOKUL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is less volatile compared to GOKUL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check GOKUL.BO's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, GOKUL.NS has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while GOKUL.NS trades at ₹38.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas GOKUL.NS's P/E ratio is 19.55. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GOKUL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is less volatile compared to GOKUL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check GOKUL.NS's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, FOODSIN.NS has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while FOODSIN.NS trades at ₹49.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas FOODSIN.NS's P/E ratio is 11.61. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FOODSIN.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is less volatile compared to FOODSIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check FOODSIN.NS's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, FOODSIN.BO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while FOODSIN.BO trades at ₹49.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas FOODSIN.BO's P/E ratio is 11.57. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FOODSIN.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is less volatile compared to FOODSIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check FOODSIN.BO's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, MCLEODRUSS.BO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while MCLEODRUSS.BO trades at ₹31.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas MCLEODRUSS.BO's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MCLEODRUSS.BO's ROE of -1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is less volatile compared to MCLEODRUSS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check MCLEODRUSS.BO's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, MCLEODRUSS.NS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while MCLEODRUSS.NS trades at ₹31.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas MCLEODRUSS.NS's P/E ratio is -1.47. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MCLEODRUSS.NS's ROE of -1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is less volatile compared to MCLEODRUSS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check MCLEODRUSS.NS's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, SARVESHWAR.BO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while SARVESHWAR.BO trades at ₹2.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas SARVESHWAR.BO's P/E ratio is 9.21. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SARVESHWAR.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is less volatile compared to SARVESHWAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check SARVESHWAR.BO's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, SARVESHWAR.NS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while SARVESHWAR.NS trades at ₹2.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas SARVESHWAR.NS's P/E ratio is 9.21. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SARVESHWAR.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is less volatile compared to SARVESHWAR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check SARVESHWAR.NS's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, SCPL.NS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while SCPL.NS trades at ₹309.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas SCPL.NS's P/E ratio is 20.79. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SCPL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is less volatile compared to SCPL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check SCPL.NS's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, SCPL.BO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while SCPL.BO trades at ₹306.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas SCPL.BO's P/E ratio is 20.58. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SCPL.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is more volatile compared to SCPL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check SCPL.BO's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, JAYSHREETEA.BO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while JAYSHREETEA.BO trades at ₹107.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas JAYSHREETEA.BO's P/E ratio is -2.74. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to JAYSHREETEA.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is more volatile compared to JAYSHREETEA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check JAYSHREETEA.BO's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, KRITINUT.BO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while KRITINUT.BO trades at ₹59.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas KRITINUT.BO's P/E ratio is 9.20. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KRITINUT.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is less volatile compared to KRITINUT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check KRITINUT.BO's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, KRITINUT.NS has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while KRITINUT.NS trades at ₹59.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas KRITINUT.NS's P/E ratio is 9.13. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KRITINUT.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is less volatile compared to KRITINUT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check KRITINUT.NS's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, MEGASTAR.BO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while MEGASTAR.BO trades at ₹254.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas MEGASTAR.BO's P/E ratio is 27.67. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MEGASTAR.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is more volatile compared to MEGASTAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check MEGASTAR.BO's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, MEGASTAR.NS has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while MEGASTAR.NS trades at ₹254.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas MEGASTAR.NS's P/E ratio is 27.60. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MEGASTAR.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is more volatile compared to MEGASTAR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check MEGASTAR.NS's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, COASTCORP.BO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while COASTCORP.BO trades at ₹42.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas COASTCORP.BO's P/E ratio is 18.31. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to COASTCORP.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is less volatile compared to COASTCORP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check COASTCORP.BO's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, COASTCORP.NS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while COASTCORP.NS trades at ₹42.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas COASTCORP.NS's P/E ratio is 18.30. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to COASTCORP.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is less volatile compared to COASTCORP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check COASTCORP.NS's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, WATERBASE.NS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while WATERBASE.NS trades at ₹75.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas WATERBASE.NS's P/E ratio is -53.19. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WATERBASE.NS's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is less volatile compared to WATERBASE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check WATERBASE.NS's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, MKPL.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while MKPL.BO trades at ₹4.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas MKPL.BO's P/E ratio is 20.50. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MKPL.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is less volatile compared to MKPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check MKPL.BO's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, UMANGDAIR.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while UMANGDAIR.BO trades at ₹76.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas UMANGDAIR.BO's P/E ratio is 41.45. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to UMANGDAIR.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is less volatile compared to UMANGDAIR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check UMANGDAIR.BO's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, WATERBASE.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while WATERBASE.BO trades at ₹40.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas WATERBASE.BO's P/E ratio is -10.02. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WATERBASE.BO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is less volatile compared to WATERBASE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check WATERBASE.BO's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, MKPL.NS has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while MKPL.NS trades at ₹4.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas MKPL.NS's P/E ratio is 20.18. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MKPL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is less volatile compared to MKPL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check MKPL.NS's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, CHATHA.BO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while CHATHA.BO trades at ₹66.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas CHATHA.BO's P/E ratio is 26.10. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CHATHA.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is less volatile compared to CHATHA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check CHATHA.BO's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, DHUNTEAIND.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while DHUNTEAIND.BO trades at ₹221.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas DHUNTEAIND.BO's P/E ratio is 1.95. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DHUNTEAIND.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is more volatile compared to DHUNTEAIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check DHUNTEAIND.BO's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, GANGESSEC.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while GANGESSEC.BO trades at ₹126.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas GANGESSEC.BO's P/E ratio is 16.62. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GANGESSEC.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is more volatile compared to GANGESSEC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check GANGESSEC.BO's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, DTIL.NS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while DTIL.NS trades at ₹115.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas DTIL.NS's P/E ratio is -8.83. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DTIL.NS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is less volatile compared to DTIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check DTIL.NS's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, DTIL.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while DTIL.BO trades at ₹115.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas DTIL.BO's P/E ratio is -8.82. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DTIL.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is less volatile compared to DTIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check DTIL.BO's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, PALASHSEC.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while PALASHSEC.BO trades at ₹120.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas PALASHSEC.BO's P/E ratio is -28.33. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PALASHSEC.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is more volatile compared to PALASHSEC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check PALASHSEC.BO's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, ROML.NS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while ROML.NS trades at ₹39.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas ROML.NS's P/E ratio is 10.96. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ROML.NS's ROE of -2.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is less volatile compared to ROML.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check ROML.NS's competition here

LTFOODS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTFOODS.NS stands at 129.2B. In comparison, GANGESSECU.NS has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LTFOODS.NS is priced at ₹372.20, while GANGESSECU.NS trades at ₹108.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTFOODS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.90, whereas GANGESSECU.NS's P/E ratio is 64.80. In terms of profitability, LTFOODS.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GANGESSECU.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LTFOODS.NS is less volatile compared to GANGESSECU.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTFOODS.NS.Check GANGESSECU.NS's competition here