L'Oréal S.A.
L'Oréal S.A. (LRLCY) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LRLCY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Household & Personal Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LRLCY | $87.99 | +0.11% | 236.4B | 31.61 | $2.80 | +1.80% |
| LRLCF | $431.92 | -0.34% | 236.8B | 31.86 | $13.91 | +1.80% |
| UNLYF | $59.70 | -5.10% | 146.5B | 22.44 | $2.66 | +3.24% |
| RBGLY | $15.14 | +0.40% | 51.4B | 30.28 | $0.50 | +3.46% |
| RBGPF | $73.88 | -1.49% | 50.2B | 26.87 | $2.75 | +3.55% |
| HENOF | $79.00 | +0.00% | 32.4B | 14.08 | $5.61 | +2.93% |
| HENOY | $20.14 | -0.64% | 31.8B | 14.39 | $1.40 | +2.87% |
| HENKY | $18.54 | -0.59% | 31.7B | 13.21 | $1.40 | +3.09% |
| HELKF | $70.90 | +0.00% | 30.7B | 12.64 | $5.61 | +3.23% |
| BDRFY | $26.30 | +0.50% | 29.9B | 27.63 | $0.95 | +0.86% |
Stock Comparison
LRLCY vs LRLCF Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, LRLCF has a market cap of 236.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while LRLCF trades at $431.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas LRLCF's P/E ratio is 31.86. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LRLCF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is less volatile compared to LRLCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check LRLCF's competition here
LRLCY vs UNLYF Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, UNLYF has a market cap of 146.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while UNLYF trades at $59.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas UNLYF's P/E ratio is 22.44. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to UNLYF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to UNLYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check UNLYF's competition here
LRLCY vs RBGLY Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, RBGLY has a market cap of 51.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while RBGLY trades at $15.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas RBGLY's P/E ratio is 30.28. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RBGLY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to RBGLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check RBGLY's competition here
LRLCY vs RBGPF Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, RBGPF has a market cap of 50.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while RBGPF trades at $73.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas RBGPF's P/E ratio is 26.87. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RBGPF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to RBGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check RBGPF's competition here
LRLCY vs HENOF Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, HENOF has a market cap of 32.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while HENOF trades at $79.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas HENOF's P/E ratio is 14.08. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HENOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to HENOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check HENOF's competition here
LRLCY vs HENOY Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, HENOY has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while HENOY trades at $20.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas HENOY's P/E ratio is 14.39. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HENOY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to HENOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check HENOY's competition here
LRLCY vs HENKY Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, HENKY has a market cap of 31.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while HENKY trades at $18.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas HENKY's P/E ratio is 13.21. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HENKY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is less volatile compared to HENKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check HENKY's competition here
LRLCY vs HELKF Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, HELKF has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while HELKF trades at $70.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas HELKF's P/E ratio is 12.64. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HELKF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to HELKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check HELKF's competition here
LRLCY vs BDRFY Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, BDRFY has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while BDRFY trades at $26.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas BDRFY's P/E ratio is 27.63. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BDRFY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to BDRFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check BDRFY's competition here
LRLCY vs BDRFF Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, BDRFF has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while BDRFF trades at $128.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas BDRFF's P/E ratio is 27.02. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BDRFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is less volatile compared to BDRFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check BDRFF's competition here
LRLCY vs KAOOY Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, KAOOY has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while KAOOY trades at $9.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas KAOOY's P/E ratio is 27.55. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KAOOY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to KAOOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check KAOOY's competition here
LRLCY vs KAOCF Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, KAOCF has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while KAOCF trades at $47.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas KAOCF's P/E ratio is 26.66. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KAOCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to KAOCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check KAOCF's competition here
LRLCY vs ETTYF Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, ETTYF has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while ETTYF trades at $24.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas ETTYF's P/E ratio is 13.25. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ETTYF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to ETTYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check ETTYF's competition here
LRLCY vs UNICY Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, UNICY has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while UNICY trades at $3.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas UNICY's P/E ratio is 20.41. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to UNICY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is less volatile compared to UNICY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check UNICY's competition here
LRLCY vs UNCHF Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, UNCHF has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while UNCHF trades at $6.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas UNCHF's P/E ratio is 20.34. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to UNCHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is less volatile compared to UNCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check UNCHF's competition here
LRLCY vs SSDOF Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, SSDOF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while SSDOF trades at $18.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas SSDOF's P/E ratio is -259.57. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SSDOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to SSDOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check SSDOF's competition here
LRLCY vs LCCTF Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, LCCTF has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while LCCTF trades at $4.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas LCCTF's P/E ratio is 63.57. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LCCTF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to LCCTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check LCCTF's competition here
LRLCY vs SSDOY Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, SSDOY has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while SSDOY trades at $16.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas SSDOY's P/E ratio is -231.86. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SSDOY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is less volatile compared to SSDOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check SSDOY's competition here
LRLCY vs KCDMF Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, KCDMF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while KCDMF trades at $1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas KCDMF's P/E ratio is 14.31. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KCDMF's ROE of +1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to KCDMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check KCDMF's competition here
LRLCY vs KCDMY Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, KCDMY has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while KCDMY trades at $9.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas KCDMY's P/E ratio is 14.47. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KCDMY's ROE of +1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is less volatile compared to KCDMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check KCDMY's competition here
LRLCY vs BICEY Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, BICEY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while BICEY trades at $32.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas BICEY's P/E ratio is 10.85. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BICEY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to BICEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check BICEY's competition here
LRLCY vs NTCOY Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, NTCOY has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while NTCOY trades at $5.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas NTCOY's P/E ratio is -8.30. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NTCOY's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is less volatile compared to NTCOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check NTCOY's competition here
LRLCY vs UNLRY Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, UNLRY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while UNLRY trades at $1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas UNLRY's P/E ratio is 18.90. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to UNLRY's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to UNLRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check UNLRY's competition here
LRLCY vs VDAHF Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, VDAHF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while VDAHF trades at $2.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas VDAHF's P/E ratio is 99.00. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VDAHF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to VDAHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check VDAHF's competition here
LRLCY vs HEGIY Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, HEGIY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while HEGIY trades at $15.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas HEGIY's P/E ratio is 10.84. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HEGIY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to HEGIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check HEGIY's competition here
LRLCY vs UNLRF Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, UNLRF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while UNLRF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas UNLRF's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to UNLRF's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to UNLRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check UNLRF's competition here
LRLCY vs RPHCF Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, RPHCF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while RPHCF trades at $14.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas RPHCF's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RPHCF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to RPHCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check RPHCF's competition here
LRLCY vs VDAHY Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, VDAHY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while VDAHY trades at $21.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas VDAHY's P/E ratio is 108.35. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VDAHY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to VDAHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check VDAHY's competition here
LRLCY vs KBYPF Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, KBYPF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while KBYPF trades at $37.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas KBYPF's P/E ratio is 42.06. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KBYPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is less volatile compared to KBYPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check KBYPF's competition here
LRLCY vs HEGIF Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, HEGIF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while HEGIF trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas HEGIF's P/E ratio is 8.46. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HEGIF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to HEGIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check HEGIF's competition here
LRLCY vs BICEF Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, BICEF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while BICEF trades at $62.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas BICEF's P/E ratio is 10.68. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BICEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to BICEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check BICEF's competition here
LRLCY vs KOSCF Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, KOSCF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while KOSCF trades at $45.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas KOSCF's P/E ratio is 65.23. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KOSCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to KOSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check KOSCF's competition here
LRLCY vs LIOPF Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, LIOPF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while LIOPF trades at $9.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas LIOPF's P/E ratio is 16.91. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LIOPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to LIOPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check LIOPF's competition here
LRLCY vs BLUMY Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, BLUMY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while BLUMY trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas BLUMY's P/E ratio is -23.33. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BLUMY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is less volatile compared to BLUMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check BLUMY's competition here
LRLCY vs FACYF Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, FACYF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while FACYF trades at $17.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas FACYF's P/E ratio is 34.22. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FACYF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to FACYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check FACYF's competition here
LRLCY vs LIOPY Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, LIOPY has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while LIOPY trades at $16.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas LIOPY's P/E ratio is 22.16. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LIOPY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to LIOPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check LIOPY's competition here
LRLCY vs PORBF Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, PORBF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while PORBF trades at $9.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas PORBF's P/E ratio is 45.23. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PORBF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to PORBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check PORBF's competition here
LRLCY vs KSRYY Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, KSRYY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while KSRYY trades at $7.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas KSRYY's P/E ratio is 54.93. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KSRYY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to KSRYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check KSRYY's competition here
LRLCY vs MIOFF Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, MIOFF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while MIOFF trades at $52.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas MIOFF's P/E ratio is 40.46. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MIOFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to MIOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check MIOFF's competition here
LRLCY vs ONXYY Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, ONXYY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while ONXYY trades at $4.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas ONXYY's P/E ratio is 32.79. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ONXYY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is less volatile compared to ONXYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check ONXYY's competition here
LRLCY vs PIGEF Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, PIGEF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while PIGEF trades at $11.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas PIGEF's P/E ratio is 23.27. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PIGEF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to PIGEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check PIGEF's competition here
LRLCY vs PGENY Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, PGENY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while PGENY trades at $2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas PGENY's P/E ratio is 23.75. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PGENY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is less volatile compared to PGENY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check PGENY's competition here
LRLCY vs SRTSF Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, SRTSF has a market cap of 846.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while SRTSF trades at $13.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas SRTSF's P/E ratio is 16.80. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SRTSF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to SRTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check SRTSF's competition here
LRLCY vs OLVI Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, OLVI has a market cap of 834.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while OLVI trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas OLVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to OLVI's ROE of -3.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is less volatile compared to OLVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check OLVI's competition here
LRLCY vs DUNIY Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, DUNIY has a market cap of 691.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while DUNIY trades at $29.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas DUNIY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DUNIY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to DUNIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check DUNIY's competition here
LRLCY vs ONXXF Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, ONXXF has a market cap of 608.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while ONXXF trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas ONXXF's P/E ratio is 25.86. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ONXXF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is less volatile compared to ONXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check ONXXF's competition here
LRLCY vs MDOMF Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, MDOMF has a market cap of 530.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while MDOMF trades at $11.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas MDOMF's P/E ratio is 130.56. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MDOMF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is less volatile compared to MDOMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check MDOMF's competition here
LRLCY vs WPNTF Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, WPNTF has a market cap of 500.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while WPNTF trades at $6.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas WPNTF's P/E ratio is 21.38. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WPNTF's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is less volatile compared to WPNTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check WPNTF's competition here
LRLCY vs YAMNF Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, YAMNF has a market cap of 464.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while YAMNF trades at $8.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas YAMNF's P/E ratio is 8.37. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to YAMNF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to YAMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check YAMNF's competition here
LRLCY vs PZCUY Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, PZCUY has a market cap of 407.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while PZCUY trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas PZCUY's P/E ratio is -35.50. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PZCUY's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is less volatile compared to PZCUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check PZCUY's competition here
LRLCY vs MCBRF Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, MCBRF has a market cap of 283.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while MCBRF trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas MCBRF's P/E ratio is 5.35. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MCBRF's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to MCBRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check MCBRF's competition here
LRLCY vs KITAF Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, KITAF has a market cap of 135.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while KITAF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas KITAF's P/E ratio is 19.41. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KITAF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is less volatile compared to KITAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check KITAF's competition here
LRLCY vs NBBTF Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, NBBTF has a market cap of 106.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while NBBTF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas NBBTF's P/E ratio is -5.30. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NBBTF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is less volatile compared to NBBTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check NBBTF's competition here
LRLCY vs UNHLF Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, UNHLF has a market cap of 94.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while UNHLF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas UNHLF's P/E ratio is -3.98. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to UNHLF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to UNHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check UNHLF's competition here
LRLCY vs RVIV Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, RVIV has a market cap of 79M. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while RVIV trades at $13.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas RVIV's P/E ratio is 64.29. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RVIV's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is less volatile compared to RVIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check RVIV's competition here
LRLCY vs KPTSF Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, KPTSF has a market cap of 65.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while KPTSF trades at $6.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas KPTSF's P/E ratio is 29.60. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KPTSF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to KPTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check KPTSF's competition here
LRLCY vs PURE Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, PURE has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while PURE trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas PURE's P/E ratio is -3.68. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PURE's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is less volatile compared to PURE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check PURE's competition here
LRLCY vs FDOGF Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, FDOGF has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while FDOGF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas FDOGF's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FDOGF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is less volatile compared to FDOGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check FDOGF's competition here
LRLCY vs ZOONF Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, ZOONF has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while ZOONF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas ZOONF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ZOONF's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to ZOONF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check ZOONF's competition here
LRLCY vs MIMNF Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, MIMNF has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while MIMNF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas MIMNF's P/E ratio is 17.10. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MIMNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to MIMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check MIMNF's competition here
LRLCY vs PRFUF Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, PRFUF has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while PRFUF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas PRFUF's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PRFUF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is less volatile compared to PRFUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check PRFUF's competition here
LRLCY vs CAWW Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, CAWW has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while CAWW trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas CAWW's P/E ratio is -5.38. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CAWW's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to CAWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check CAWW's competition here
LRLCY vs MAVBF Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, MAVBF has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while MAVBF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas MAVBF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MAVBF's ROE of -2.47%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to MAVBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check MAVBF's competition here
LRLCY vs DQWS Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, DQWS has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while DQWS trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas DQWS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DQWS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is less volatile compared to DQWS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check DQWS's competition here
LRLCY vs REVRQ Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, REVRQ has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while REVRQ trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas REVRQ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to REVRQ's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to REVRQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check REVRQ's competition here
LRLCY vs SPCO Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, SPCO has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while SPCO trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas SPCO's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SPCO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to SPCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check SPCO's competition here
LRLCY vs NUVI Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, NUVI has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while NUVI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas NUVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NUVI's ROE of +9.49%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to NUVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check NUVI's competition here
LRLCY vs CLGOF Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, CLGOF has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while CLGOF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas CLGOF's P/E ratio is -3.45. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CLGOF's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to CLGOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check CLGOF's competition here
LRLCY vs SNBH Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, SNBH has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while SNBH trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas SNBH's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SNBH's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is less volatile compared to SNBH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check SNBH's competition here
LRLCY vs SKVI Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, SKVI has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while SKVI trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas SKVI's P/E ratio is -2.28. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SKVI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is less volatile compared to SKVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check SKVI's competition here
LRLCY vs SLGD Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, SLGD has a market cap of 812.9K. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while SLGD trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas SLGD's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SLGD's ROE of +4.57%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is less volatile compared to SLGD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check SLGD's competition here
LRLCY vs NASO Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, NASO has a market cap of 748.8K. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while NASO trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas NASO's P/E ratio is -87.00. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NASO's ROE of +1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to NASO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check NASO's competition here
LRLCY vs WNBD Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, WNBD has a market cap of 700K. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while WNBD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas WNBD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WNBD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is less volatile compared to WNBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check WNBD's competition here
LRLCY vs PHLI Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, PHLI has a market cap of 438.3K. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while PHLI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas PHLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PHLI's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is less volatile compared to PHLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check PHLI's competition here
LRLCY vs HRSR Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, HRSR has a market cap of 185.6K. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while HRSR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas HRSR's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HRSR's ROE of +65.69%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is less volatile compared to HRSR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check HRSR's competition here
LRLCY vs TVOG Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, TVOG has a market cap of 105.9K. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while TVOG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas TVOG's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TVOG's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to TVOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check TVOG's competition here
LRLCY vs EESO Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, EESO has a market cap of 72.9K. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while EESO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas EESO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EESO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to EESO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check EESO's competition here
LRLCY vs BRSHF Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, BRSHF has a market cap of 67K. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while BRSHF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas BRSHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BRSHF's ROE of +14.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to BRSHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check BRSHF's competition here
LRLCY vs EOSS Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, EOSS has a market cap of 60.5K. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while EOSS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas EOSS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EOSS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to EOSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check EOSS's competition here
LRLCY vs QNTA Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, QNTA has a market cap of 40.7K. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while QNTA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas QNTA's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to QNTA's ROE of +2.75%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to QNTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check QNTA's competition here
LRLCY vs SYHO Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, SYHO has a market cap of 39.6K. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while SYHO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas SYHO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SYHO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to SYHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check SYHO's competition here
LRLCY vs GRBG Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, GRBG has a market cap of 39K. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while GRBG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas GRBG's P/E ratio is 0.10. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GRBG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to GRBG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check GRBG's competition here
LRLCY vs JOEY Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, JOEY has a market cap of 28.2K. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while JOEY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas JOEY's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to JOEY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to JOEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check JOEY's competition here
LRLCY vs PYCT Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, PYCT has a market cap of 27.7K. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while PYCT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas PYCT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PYCT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to PYCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check PYCT's competition here
LRLCY vs SNST Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, SNST has a market cap of 26.6K. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while SNST trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas SNST's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SNST's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to SNST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check SNST's competition here
LRLCY vs INBI Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, INBI has a market cap of 18.1K. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while INBI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas INBI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to INBI's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is less volatile compared to INBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check INBI's competition here
LRLCY vs HPTN Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, HPTN has a market cap of 17.8K. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while HPTN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas HPTN's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HPTN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to HPTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check HPTN's competition here
LRLCY vs GYSN Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, GYSN has a market cap of 14K. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while GYSN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas GYSN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GYSN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to GYSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check GYSN's competition here
LRLCY vs KPOC Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, KPOC has a market cap of 13.7K. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while KPOC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas KPOC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KPOC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to KPOC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check KPOC's competition here
LRLCY vs ZRVT Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, ZRVT has a market cap of 13K. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while ZRVT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas ZRVT's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ZRVT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to ZRVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check ZRVT's competition here
LRLCY vs NUUU Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, NUUU has a market cap of 11.8K. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while NUUU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas NUUU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NUUU's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is less volatile compared to NUUU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check NUUU's competition here
LRLCY vs EMPO Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, EMPO has a market cap of 6.3K. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while EMPO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas EMPO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EMPO's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to EMPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check EMPO's competition here
LRLCY vs BEUT Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, BEUT has a market cap of 3.2K. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while BEUT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas BEUT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BEUT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to BEUT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check BEUT's competition here
LRLCY vs NCDP Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, NCDP has a market cap of 1.8K. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while NCDP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas NCDP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NCDP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to NCDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check NCDP's competition here
LRLCY vs MDAV Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, MDAV has a market cap of 1.4K. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while MDAV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas MDAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MDAV's ROE of -1.64%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to MDAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check MDAV's competition here
LRLCY vs PCGR Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, PCGR has a market cap of 785. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while PCGR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas PCGR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PCGR's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to PCGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check PCGR's competition here
LRLCY vs RBCL Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, RBCL has a market cap of 221. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while RBCL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas RBCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RBCL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to RBCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check RBCL's competition here
LRLCY vs SOYO Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, SOYO has a market cap of 62. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while SOYO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas SOYO's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SOYO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to SOYO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check SOYO's competition here
LRLCY vs BMXC Comparison July 2025
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 236.4B. In comparison, BMXC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $87.99, while BMXC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.61, whereas BMXC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BMXC's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to BMXC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.Check BMXC's competition here