L'Oréal S.A.
L'Oréal S.A. LRLCY Peers
See (LRLCY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Household & Personal Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LRLCY | $85.34 | +0.30% | 228B | 31.26 | $2.73 | +1.86% |
| LRLCF | $426.39 | -0.06% | 227.8B | 30.81 | $13.84 | +1.82% |
| UNLYF | $65.02 | +4.44% | 159.6B | 24.82 | $2.62 | +2.97% |
| RBGLY | $13.89 | -0.04% | 47.2B | 25.25 | $0.55 | +3.76% |
| RBGPF | $67.66 | -3.37% | 46B | 24.78 | $2.73 | +3.88% |
| HELKF | $79.11 | +10.90% | 34.4B | 14.38 | $5.50 | +2.50% |
| HENKY | $17.79 | +0.40% | 31.2B | 12.89 | $1.38 | +2.77% |
| HENOY | $19.43 | +0.05% | 30.8B | 14.18 | $1.37 | +2.56% |
| HENOF | $75.00 | -5.06% | 29.4B | 13.64 | $5.50 | +2.67% |
| BDRFY | $25.61 | -3.39% | 28.7B | 27.54 | $0.93 | +0.88% |
Stock Comparison
LRLCY vs LRLCF Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, LRLCF has a market cap of 227.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while LRLCF trades at $426.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas LRLCF's P/E ratio is 30.81. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LRLCF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is less volatile compared to LRLCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs UNLYF Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, UNLYF has a market cap of 159.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while UNLYF trades at $65.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas UNLYF's P/E ratio is 24.82. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to UNLYF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to UNLYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs RBGLY Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, RBGLY has a market cap of 47.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while RBGLY trades at $13.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas RBGLY's P/E ratio is 25.25. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RBGLY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to RBGLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs RBGPF Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, RBGPF has a market cap of 46B. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while RBGPF trades at $67.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas RBGPF's P/E ratio is 24.78. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RBGPF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to RBGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs HELKF Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, HELKF has a market cap of 34.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while HELKF trades at $79.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas HELKF's P/E ratio is 14.38. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HELKF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is less volatile compared to HELKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs HENKY Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, HENKY has a market cap of 31.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while HENKY trades at $17.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas HENKY's P/E ratio is 12.89. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HENKY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to HENKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs HENOY Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, HENOY has a market cap of 30.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while HENOY trades at $19.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas HENOY's P/E ratio is 14.18. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HENOY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to HENOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs HENOF Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, HENOF has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while HENOF trades at $75.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas HENOF's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HENOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to HENOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs BDRFY Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, BDRFY has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while BDRFY trades at $25.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas BDRFY's P/E ratio is 27.54. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BDRFY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to BDRFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs BDRFF Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, BDRFF has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while BDRFF trades at $127.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas BDRFF's P/E ratio is 27.77. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BDRFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to BDRFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs KAOOY Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, KAOOY has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while KAOOY trades at $9.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas KAOOY's P/E ratio is 27.18. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KAOOY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to KAOOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs ETTYF Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, ETTYF has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while ETTYF trades at $29.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas ETTYF's P/E ratio is 15.70. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ETTYF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to ETTYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs KAOCF Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, KAOCF has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while KAOCF trades at $41.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas KAOCF's P/E ratio is 25.65. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KAOCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is less volatile compared to KAOCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs UNCHF Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, UNCHF has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while UNCHF trades at $8.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas UNCHF's P/E ratio is 23.31. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to UNCHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is less volatile compared to UNCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs UNICY Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, UNICY has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while UNICY trades at $3.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas UNICY's P/E ratio is 23.01. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to UNICY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is less volatile compared to UNICY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs SSDOY Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, SSDOY has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while SSDOY trades at $16.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas SSDOY's P/E ratio is -242.57. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SSDOY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to SSDOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs LCCTF Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, LCCTF has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while LCCTF trades at $4.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas LCCTF's P/E ratio is 63.57. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LCCTF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to LCCTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs SSDOF Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, SSDOF has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while SSDOF trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas SSDOF's P/E ratio is -214.29. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SSDOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to SSDOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs KCDMY Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, KCDMY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while KCDMY trades at $9.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas KCDMY's P/E ratio is 14.29. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KCDMY's ROE of +1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is less volatile compared to KCDMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs KCDMF Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, KCDMF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while KCDMF trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas KCDMF's P/E ratio is 13.85. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KCDMF's ROE of +1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to KCDMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs LIOPY Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, LIOPY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while LIOPY trades at $19.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas LIOPY's P/E ratio is 26.49. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LIOPY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to LIOPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs BICEY Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, BICEY has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while BICEY trades at $31.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas BICEY's P/E ratio is 10.90. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BICEY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is less volatile compared to BICEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs RPHCF Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, RPHCF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while RPHCF trades at $20.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas RPHCF's P/E ratio is 21.60. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RPHCF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is less volatile compared to RPHCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs UNLRY Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, UNLRY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while UNLRY trades at $2.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas UNLRY's P/E ratio is 20.40. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to UNLRY's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to UNLRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs NTCOY Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, NTCOY has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while NTCOY trades at $5.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas NTCOY's P/E ratio is -8.30. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NTCOY's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is less volatile compared to NTCOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs VDAHF Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, VDAHF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while VDAHF trades at $2.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas VDAHF's P/E ratio is 99.00. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VDAHF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to VDAHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs HEGIF Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, HEGIF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while HEGIF trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas HEGIF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HEGIF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to HEGIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs HEGIY Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, HEGIY has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while HEGIY trades at $13.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas HEGIY's P/E ratio is 9.99. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HEGIY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is less volatile compared to HEGIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs BLUMY Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, BLUMY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while BLUMY trades at $2.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas BLUMY's P/E ratio is -29.00. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BLUMY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to BLUMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs VDAHY Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, VDAHY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while VDAHY trades at $21.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas VDAHY's P/E ratio is 108.35. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VDAHY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to VDAHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs UNLRF Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, UNLRF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while UNLRF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas UNLRF's P/E ratio is 7.45. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to UNLRF's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to UNLRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs LIOPF Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, LIOPF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while LIOPF trades at $10.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas LIOPF's P/E ratio is 18.94. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LIOPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to LIOPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs KBYPF Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, KBYPF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while KBYPF trades at $35.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas KBYPF's P/E ratio is 39.37. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KBYPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to KBYPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs KOSCF Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, KOSCF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while KOSCF trades at $45.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas KOSCF's P/E ratio is 63.39. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KOSCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to KOSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs BICEF Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, BICEF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while BICEF trades at $61.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas BICEF's P/E ratio is 10.60. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BICEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to BICEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs FACYF Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, FACYF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while FACYF trades at $17.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas FACYF's P/E ratio is 34.22. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FACYF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to FACYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs KSRYY Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, KSRYY has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while KSRYY trades at $7.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas KSRYY's P/E ratio is 56.79. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KSRYY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to KSRYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs PORBF Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, PORBF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while PORBF trades at $9.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas PORBF's P/E ratio is 42.73. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PORBF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to PORBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs MIOFF Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, MIOFF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while MIOFF trades at $52.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas MIOFF's P/E ratio is 40.46. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MIOFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to MIOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs PGENY Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, PGENY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while PGENY trades at $3.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas PGENY's P/E ratio is 26.54. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PGENY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to PGENY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs PIGEF Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, PIGEF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while PIGEF trades at $10.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas PIGEF's P/E ratio is 20.53. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PIGEF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is less volatile compared to PIGEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs OLVI Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, OLVI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while OLVI trades at $1.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas OLVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to OLVI's ROE of -3.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is less volatile compared to OLVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs SRTSF Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, SRTSF has a market cap of 894.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while SRTSF trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas SRTSF's P/E ratio is 17.07. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SRTSF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to SRTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs ONXYY Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, ONXYY has a market cap of 746M. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while ONXYY trades at $4.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas ONXYY's P/E ratio is 32.86. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ONXYY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to ONXYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs ONXXF Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, ONXXF has a market cap of 695.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while ONXXF trades at $8.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas ONXXF's P/E ratio is 29.59. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ONXXF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to ONXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs DUNIY Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, DUNIY has a market cap of 490.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while DUNIY trades at $20.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas DUNIY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DUNIY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to DUNIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs PZCUY Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, PZCUY has a market cap of 481.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while PZCUY trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas PZCUY's P/E ratio is -35.50. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PZCUY's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is less volatile compared to PZCUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs MDOMF Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, MDOMF has a market cap of 446.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while MDOMF trades at $9.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas MDOMF's P/E ratio is 110.00. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MDOMF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is less volatile compared to MDOMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs MCBRF Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, MCBRF has a market cap of 358.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while MCBRF trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas MCBRF's P/E ratio is 6.77. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MCBRF's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is less volatile compared to MCBRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs UNHLF Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, UNHLF has a market cap of 308.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while UNHLF trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas UNHLF's P/E ratio is 26.00. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to UNHLF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is less volatile compared to UNHLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs YAMNF Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, YAMNF has a market cap of 301M. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while YAMNF trades at $5.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas YAMNF's P/E ratio is 5.42. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to YAMNF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to YAMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs WPNTF Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, WPNTF has a market cap of 171.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while WPNTF trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas WPNTF's P/E ratio is 7.31. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WPNTF's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is less volatile compared to WPNTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs KITAF Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, KITAF has a market cap of 130.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while KITAF trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas KITAF's P/E ratio is 15.64. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KITAF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to KITAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs NBBTF Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, NBBTF has a market cap of 105.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while NBBTF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas NBBTF's P/E ratio is -5.25. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NBBTF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to NBBTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs RVIV Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, RVIV has a market cap of 79M. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while RVIV trades at $13.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas RVIV's P/E ratio is 64.29. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RVIV's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is less volatile compared to RVIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs KPTSF Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, KPTSF has a market cap of 66.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while KPTSF trades at $6.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas KPTSF's P/E ratio is 30.41. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KPTSF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to KPTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs PRFUF Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, PRFUF has a market cap of 26.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while PRFUF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas PRFUF's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PRFUF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to PRFUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs HPTN Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, HPTN has a market cap of 11.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while HPTN trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas HPTN's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HPTN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is less volatile compared to HPTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs FDOGF Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, FDOGF has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while FDOGF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas FDOGF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FDOGF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to FDOGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs PURE Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, PURE has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while PURE trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas PURE's P/E ratio is -4.15. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PURE's ROE of +1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to PURE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs SNBH Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, SNBH has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while SNBH trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas SNBH's P/E ratio is -3.25. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SNBH's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is less volatile compared to SNBH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs CAWW Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, CAWW has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while CAWW trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas CAWW's P/E ratio is -6.20. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CAWW's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is less volatile compared to CAWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs MIMNF Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, MIMNF has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while MIMNF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas MIMNF's P/E ratio is 17.10. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MIMNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to MIMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs MAVBF Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, MAVBF has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while MAVBF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas MAVBF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MAVBF's ROE of -2.47%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to MAVBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs DQWS Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, DQWS has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while DQWS trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas DQWS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DQWS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to DQWS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs REVRQ Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, REVRQ has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while REVRQ trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas REVRQ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to REVRQ's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to REVRQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs SPCO Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, SPCO has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while SPCO trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas SPCO's P/E ratio is -10.62. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SPCO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to SPCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs NUVI Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, NUVI has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while NUVI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas NUVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NUVI's ROE of +9.49%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to NUVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs PYCT Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, PYCT has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while PYCT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas PYCT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PYCT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is less volatile compared to PYCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs HRSR Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, HRSR has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while HRSR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas HRSR's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HRSR's ROE of +65.69%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is less volatile compared to HRSR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs ZRVT Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, ZRVT has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while ZRVT trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas ZRVT's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ZRVT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is less volatile compared to ZRVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs CLGOF Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, CLGOF has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while CLGOF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas CLGOF's P/E ratio is -2.27. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CLGOF's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to CLGOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs ZOONF Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, ZOONF has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while ZOONF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas ZOONF's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ZOONF's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is less volatile compared to ZOONF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs SKVI Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, SKVI has a market cap of 914.9K. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while SKVI trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas SKVI's P/E ratio is -1.69. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SKVI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to SKVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs SLGD Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, SLGD has a market cap of 812.9K. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while SLGD trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas SLGD's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SLGD's ROE of +4.57%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is less volatile compared to SLGD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs NASO Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, NASO has a market cap of 774.1K. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while NASO trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas NASO's P/E ratio is -89.95. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NASO's ROE of +1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to NASO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs EESO Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, EESO has a market cap of 729.2K. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while EESO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas EESO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EESO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to EESO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs WNBD Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, WNBD has a market cap of 700K. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while WNBD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas WNBD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WNBD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to WNBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs EOSS Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, EOSS has a market cap of 665.3K. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while EOSS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas EOSS's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EOSS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is less volatile compared to EOSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs PHLI Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, PHLI has a market cap of 438.3K. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while PHLI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas PHLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PHLI's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is less volatile compared to PHLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs NUUU Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, NUUU has a market cap of 117.8K. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while NUUU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas NUUU's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NUUU's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is less volatile compared to NUUU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs TVOG Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, TVOG has a market cap of 105.9K. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while TVOG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas TVOG's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TVOG's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to TVOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs MDAV Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, MDAV has a market cap of 85.4K. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while MDAV trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas MDAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MDAV's ROE of -1.64%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is less volatile compared to MDAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs GYSN Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, GYSN has a market cap of 69.9K. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while GYSN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas GYSN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GYSN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is less volatile compared to GYSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs BRSHF Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, BRSHF has a market cap of 67K. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while BRSHF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas BRSHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BRSHF's ROE of +14.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is less volatile compared to BRSHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs QNTA Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, QNTA has a market cap of 40.7K. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while QNTA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas QNTA's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to QNTA's ROE of +2.75%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to QNTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs SYHO Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, SYHO has a market cap of 39.6K. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while SYHO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas SYHO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SYHO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to SYHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs GRBG Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, GRBG has a market cap of 39K. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while GRBG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas GRBG's P/E ratio is 0.10. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GRBG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is less volatile compared to GRBG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs JOEY Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, JOEY has a market cap of 28.2K. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while JOEY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas JOEY's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to JOEY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to JOEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs SNST Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, SNST has a market cap of 26.6K. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while SNST trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas SNST's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SNST's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to SNST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs INBI Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, INBI has a market cap of 18.1K. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while INBI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas INBI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to INBI's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is less volatile compared to INBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs KPOC Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, KPOC has a market cap of 13.7K. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while KPOC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas KPOC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KPOC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to KPOC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs EMPO Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, EMPO has a market cap of 6.3K. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while EMPO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas EMPO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EMPO's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to EMPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs BEUT Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, BEUT has a market cap of 3.2K. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while BEUT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas BEUT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BEUT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to BEUT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs NCDP Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, NCDP has a market cap of 1.8K. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while NCDP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas NCDP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NCDP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to NCDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs PCGR Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, PCGR has a market cap of 785. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while PCGR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas PCGR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PCGR's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to PCGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs RBCL Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, RBCL has a market cap of 221. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while RBCL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas RBCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RBCL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is less volatile compared to RBCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs SOYO Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, SOYO has a market cap of 62. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while SOYO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas SOYO's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SOYO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to SOYO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.
LRLCY vs BWXXF Comparison
LRLCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRLCY stands at 228B. In comparison, BWXXF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LRLCY is priced at $85.34, while BWXXF trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRLCY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.26, whereas BWXXF's P/E ratio is 35.00. In terms of profitability, LRLCY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BWXXF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LRLCY is more volatile compared to BWXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRLCY.