Lockheed Martin Corporation
Lockheed Martin Corporation LOM.DE Peers
See (LOM.DE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Aerospace & Defense Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LOM.DE | $423.45 | +1.16% | 99.21B | 20.70 | $20.46 | +2.67% |
| 5UR.DE | $117.00 | +3.41% | 156.31B | 38.87 | $3.01 | +1.98% |
| BCO.DE | $177.96 | +3.86% | 134.18B | -11.23 | -$15.84 | N/A |
| AIR.DE | $158.78 | +0.19% | 125.01B | 28.30 | $5.61 | +0.63% |
| RRU.DE | $9.39 | -0.17% | 79.51B | N/A | N/A | +0.64% |
| RHM.DE | $1,594.00 | -5.90% | 72.55B | 89.50 | $17.81 | +0.36% |
| GDX.DE | $245.85 | +2.29% | 65.99B | 19.33 | $12.72 | +2.02% |
| NTH.DE | $429.90 | +0.82% | 61.87B | 19.24 | $22.34 | +1.68% |
| BSP.DE | $19.90 | -0.90% | 58.29B | 26.18 | $0.76 | +1.65% |
| 48Z.DE | $123.00 | -0.20% | 50.64B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
LOM.DE vs 5UR.DE Comparison
LOM.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOM.DE stands at 99.21B. In comparison, 5UR.DE has a market cap of 156.31B. Regarding current trading prices, LOM.DE is priced at $423.45, while 5UR.DE trades at $117.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 20.70, whereas 5UR.DE's P/E ratio is 38.87. In terms of profitability, LOM.DE's ROE is +0.83%, compared to 5UR.DE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LOM.DE is more volatile compared to 5UR.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOM.DE.
LOM.DE vs BCO.DE Comparison
LOM.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOM.DE stands at 99.21B. In comparison, BCO.DE has a market cap of 134.18B. Regarding current trading prices, LOM.DE is priced at $423.45, while BCO.DE trades at $177.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 20.70, whereas BCO.DE's P/E ratio is -11.23. In terms of profitability, LOM.DE's ROE is +0.83%, compared to BCO.DE's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, LOM.DE is less volatile compared to BCO.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOM.DE.
LOM.DE vs AIR.DE Comparison
LOM.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOM.DE stands at 99.21B. In comparison, AIR.DE has a market cap of 125.01B. Regarding current trading prices, LOM.DE is priced at $423.45, while AIR.DE trades at $158.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 20.70, whereas AIR.DE's P/E ratio is 28.30. In terms of profitability, LOM.DE's ROE is +0.83%, compared to AIR.DE's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LOM.DE is less volatile compared to AIR.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOM.DE.
LOM.DE vs RRU.DE Comparison
LOM.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOM.DE stands at 99.21B. In comparison, RRU.DE has a market cap of 79.51B. Regarding current trading prices, LOM.DE is priced at $423.45, while RRU.DE trades at $9.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 20.70, whereas RRU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LOM.DE's ROE is +0.83%, compared to RRU.DE's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, LOM.DE is less volatile compared to RRU.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOM.DE.
LOM.DE vs RHM.DE Comparison
LOM.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOM.DE stands at 99.21B. In comparison, RHM.DE has a market cap of 72.55B. Regarding current trading prices, LOM.DE is priced at $423.45, while RHM.DE trades at $1,594.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 20.70, whereas RHM.DE's P/E ratio is 89.50. In terms of profitability, LOM.DE's ROE is +0.83%, compared to RHM.DE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LOM.DE is less volatile compared to RHM.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOM.DE.
LOM.DE vs GDX.DE Comparison
LOM.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOM.DE stands at 99.21B. In comparison, GDX.DE has a market cap of 65.99B. Regarding current trading prices, LOM.DE is priced at $423.45, while GDX.DE trades at $245.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 20.70, whereas GDX.DE's P/E ratio is 19.33. In terms of profitability, LOM.DE's ROE is +0.83%, compared to GDX.DE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LOM.DE is less volatile compared to GDX.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOM.DE.
LOM.DE vs NTH.DE Comparison
LOM.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOM.DE stands at 99.21B. In comparison, NTH.DE has a market cap of 61.87B. Regarding current trading prices, LOM.DE is priced at $423.45, while NTH.DE trades at $429.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 20.70, whereas NTH.DE's P/E ratio is 19.24. In terms of profitability, LOM.DE's ROE is +0.83%, compared to NTH.DE's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LOM.DE is less volatile compared to NTH.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOM.DE.
LOM.DE vs BSP.DE Comparison
LOM.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOM.DE stands at 99.21B. In comparison, BSP.DE has a market cap of 58.29B. Regarding current trading prices, LOM.DE is priced at $423.45, while BSP.DE trades at $19.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 20.70, whereas BSP.DE's P/E ratio is 26.18. In terms of profitability, LOM.DE's ROE is +0.83%, compared to BSP.DE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LOM.DE is less volatile compared to BSP.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOM.DE.
LOM.DE vs 48Z.DE Comparison
LOM.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOM.DE stands at 99.21B. In comparison, 48Z.DE has a market cap of 50.64B. Regarding current trading prices, LOM.DE is priced at $423.45, while 48Z.DE trades at $123.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 20.70, whereas 48Z.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LOM.DE's ROE is +0.83%, compared to 48Z.DE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LOM.DE is less volatile compared to 48Z.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOM.DE.
LOM.DE vs MTX.DE Comparison
LOM.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOM.DE stands at 99.21B. In comparison, MTX.DE has a market cap of 17.64B. Regarding current trading prices, LOM.DE is priced at $423.45, while MTX.DE trades at $327.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 20.70, whereas MTX.DE's P/E ratio is 28.41. In terms of profitability, LOM.DE's ROE is +0.83%, compared to MTX.DE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LOM.DE is less volatile compared to MTX.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOM.DE.
LOM.DE vs HAG.DE Comparison
LOM.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOM.DE stands at 99.21B. In comparison, HAG.DE has a market cap of 7.51B. Regarding current trading prices, LOM.DE is priced at $423.45, while HAG.DE trades at $65.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 20.70, whereas HAG.DE's P/E ratio is 69.89. In terms of profitability, LOM.DE's ROE is +0.83%, compared to HAG.DE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LOM.DE is less volatile compared to HAG.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOM.DE.
LOM.DE vs R3NK.F Comparison
LOM.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOM.DE stands at 99.21B. In comparison, R3NK.F has a market cap of 5.44B. Regarding current trading prices, LOM.DE is priced at $423.45, while R3NK.F trades at $54.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 20.70, whereas R3NK.F's P/E ratio is 102.72. In terms of profitability, LOM.DE's ROE is +0.83%, compared to R3NK.F's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LOM.DE is less volatile compared to R3NK.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOM.DE.
LOM.DE vs R3NK.DE Comparison
LOM.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOM.DE stands at 99.21B. In comparison, R3NK.DE has a market cap of 5.44B. Regarding current trading prices, LOM.DE is priced at $423.45, while R3NK.DE trades at $54.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 20.70, whereas R3NK.DE's P/E ratio is 102.62. In terms of profitability, LOM.DE's ROE is +0.83%, compared to R3NK.DE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LOM.DE is less volatile compared to R3NK.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOM.DE.
LOM.DE vs R3NK.BE Comparison
LOM.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOM.DE stands at 99.21B. In comparison, R3NK.BE has a market cap of 5.41B. Regarding current trading prices, LOM.DE is priced at $423.45, while R3NK.BE trades at $54.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 20.70, whereas R3NK.BE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LOM.DE's ROE is +0.83%, compared to R3NK.BE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LOM.DE is less volatile compared to R3NK.BE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOM.DE.
LOM.DE vs W8C.SG Comparison
LOM.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOM.DE stands at 99.21B. In comparison, W8C.SG has a market cap of 1.55B. Regarding current trading prices, LOM.DE is priced at $423.45, while W8C.SG trades at $25.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 20.70, whereas W8C.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LOM.DE's ROE is +0.83%, compared to W8C.SG's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, LOM.DE is more volatile compared to W8C.SG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOM.DE.
LOM.DE vs OHB.DE Comparison
LOM.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOM.DE stands at 99.21B. In comparison, OHB.DE has a market cap of 1.26B. Regarding current trading prices, LOM.DE is priced at $423.45, while OHB.DE trades at $65.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 20.70, whereas OHB.DE's P/E ratio is -6580.00. In terms of profitability, LOM.DE's ROE is +0.83%, compared to OHB.DE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LOM.DE is less volatile compared to OHB.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOM.DE.
LOM.DE vs 1FC.DE Comparison
LOM.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOM.DE stands at 99.21B. In comparison, 1FC.DE has a market cap of 317.78M. Regarding current trading prices, LOM.DE is priced at $423.45, while 1FC.DE trades at $6.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 20.70, whereas 1FC.DE's P/E ratio is 99.14. In terms of profitability, LOM.DE's ROE is +0.83%, compared to 1FC.DE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LOM.DE is less volatile compared to 1FC.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOM.DE.