Lenovo Group Limited
Lenovo Group Limited LNVGY Peers
See (LNVGY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Computer Hardware Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LNVGY | $24.12 | -0.12% | 15B | 11.37 | $2.12 | +4.01% |
| QUCCF | $12.25 | +0.00% | 362.9B | 10.21 | $1.20 | +17.75% |
| CAJPY | $28.68 | +0.88% | 26.5B | 22.94 | $1.25 | +3.17% |
| CAJFF | $27.55 | +0.00% | 25.5B | 21.87 | $1.26 | +3.72% |
| LNVGF | $1.19 | -2.06% | 14.8B | 10.82 | $0.11 | +4.14% |
| SEKEY | $6.50 | +0.00% | 4.2B | 11.19 | $0.58 | +3.21% |
| SEKEF | $11.90 | +0.00% | 3.8B | 10.35 | $1.15 | +4.23% |
| ASUUY | $98.69 | +0.00% | 2.9B | 11.11 | $8.88 | +2.62% |
| LGNRF | $1.13 | +0.00% | 2.7B | -4.52 | -$0.25 | N/A |
| FXCOF | $1.76 | +0.00% | 2.5B | 17.60 | $0.10 | +2.72% |
Stock Comparison
LNVGY vs QUCCF Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 15B. In comparison, QUCCF has a market cap of 362.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $24.12, while QUCCF trades at $12.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.37, whereas QUCCF's P/E ratio is 10.21. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to QUCCF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is less volatile compared to QUCCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs CAJPY Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 15B. In comparison, CAJPY has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $24.12, while CAJPY trades at $28.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.37, whereas CAJPY's P/E ratio is 22.94. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CAJPY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is more volatile compared to CAJPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs CAJFF Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 15B. In comparison, CAJFF has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $24.12, while CAJFF trades at $27.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.37, whereas CAJFF's P/E ratio is 21.87. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CAJFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is less volatile compared to CAJFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs LNVGF Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 15B. In comparison, LNVGF has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $24.12, while LNVGF trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.37, whereas LNVGF's P/E ratio is 10.82. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to LNVGF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is more volatile compared to LNVGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs SEKEY Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 15B. In comparison, SEKEY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $24.12, while SEKEY trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.37, whereas SEKEY's P/E ratio is 11.19. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SEKEY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is less volatile compared to SEKEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs SEKEF Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 15B. In comparison, SEKEF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $24.12, while SEKEF trades at $11.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.37, whereas SEKEF's P/E ratio is 10.35. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SEKEF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is less volatile compared to SEKEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs ASUUY Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 15B. In comparison, ASUUY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $24.12, while ASUUY trades at $98.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.37, whereas ASUUY's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ASUUY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is more volatile compared to ASUUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs LGNRF Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 15B. In comparison, LGNRF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $24.12, while LGNRF trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.37, whereas LGNRF's P/E ratio is -4.52. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to LGNRF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is more volatile compared to LGNRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs FXCOF Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 15B. In comparison, FXCOF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $24.12, while FXCOF trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.37, whereas FXCOF's P/E ratio is 17.60. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to FXCOF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is more volatile compared to FXCOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs TSHTY Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 15B. In comparison, TSHTY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $24.12, while TSHTY trades at $9.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.37, whereas TSHTY's P/E ratio is 5.08. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TSHTY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is less volatile compared to TSHTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs DRSHF Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 15B. In comparison, DRSHF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $24.12, while DRSHF trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.37, whereas DRSHF's P/E ratio is 163.05. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DRSHF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is less volatile compared to DRSHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs ACEYY Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 15B. In comparison, ACEYY has a market cap of 618.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $24.12, while ACEYY trades at $5.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.37, whereas ACEYY's P/E ratio is 34.27. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ACEYY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is more volatile compared to ACEYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs WACMY Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 15B. In comparison, WACMY has a market cap of 613.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $24.12, while WACMY trades at $4.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.37, whereas WACMY's P/E ratio is 2.61. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to WACMY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is less volatile compared to WACMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs WACMF Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 15B. In comparison, WACMF has a market cap of 560.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $24.12, while WACMF trades at $4.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.37, whereas WACMF's P/E ratio is 2.45. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to WACMF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is less volatile compared to WACMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs PCPPF Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 15B. In comparison, PCPPF has a market cap of 384M. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $24.12, while PCPPF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.37, whereas PCPPF's P/E ratio is 8.33. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PCPPF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is less volatile compared to PCPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs JFEYF Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 15B. In comparison, JFEYF has a market cap of 292.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $24.12, while JFEYF trades at $9.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.37, whereas JFEYF's P/E ratio is 4.98. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to JFEYF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is less volatile compared to JFEYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs AOMUF Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 15B. In comparison, AOMUF has a market cap of 153.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $24.12, while AOMUF trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.37, whereas AOMUF's P/E ratio is -10.62. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to AOMUF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is more volatile compared to AOMUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs TBIIF Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 15B. In comparison, TBIIF has a market cap of 119.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $24.12, while TBIIF trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.37, whereas TBIIF's P/E ratio is 51.20. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TBIIF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is less volatile compared to TBIIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs TAKOF Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 15B. In comparison, TAKOF has a market cap of 109.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $24.12, while TAKOF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.37, whereas TAKOF's P/E ratio is -7.33. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TAKOF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is less volatile compared to TAKOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs SCTQ Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 15B. In comparison, SCTQ has a market cap of 98.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $24.12, while SCTQ trades at $2.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.37, whereas SCTQ's P/E ratio is 15.64. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SCTQ's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is more volatile compared to SCTQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs FRIIF Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 15B. In comparison, FRIIF has a market cap of 79.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $24.12, while FRIIF trades at $12.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.37, whereas FRIIF's P/E ratio is 6.28. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to FRIIF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is less volatile compared to FRIIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs XAARF Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 15B. In comparison, XAARF has a market cap of 72.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $24.12, while XAARF trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.37, whereas XAARF's P/E ratio is -5.11. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to XAARF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is less volatile compared to XAARF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs CREAF Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 15B. In comparison, CREAF has a market cap of 46.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $24.12, while CREAF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.37, whereas CREAF's P/E ratio is -3.67. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CREAF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is less volatile compared to CREAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs AOTOF Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 15B. In comparison, AOTOF has a market cap of 33.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $24.12, while AOTOF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.37, whereas AOTOF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to AOTOF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is more volatile compared to AOTOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs PRWYF Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 15B. In comparison, PRWYF has a market cap of 31M. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $24.12, while PRWYF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.37, whereas PRWYF's P/E ratio is -1.62. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PRWYF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is less volatile compared to PRWYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs AITX Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 15B. In comparison, AITX has a market cap of 18.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $24.12, while AITX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.37, whereas AITX's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to AITX's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is less volatile compared to AITX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs EVRC Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 15B. In comparison, EVRC has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $24.12, while EVRC trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.37, whereas EVRC's P/E ratio is 6.67. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to EVRC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is less volatile compared to EVRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs CCUR Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 15B. In comparison, CCUR has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $24.12, while CCUR trades at $1,887.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.37, whereas CCUR's P/E ratio is -4.69. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CCUR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is less volatile compared to CCUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs FNTTF Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 15B. In comparison, FNTTF has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $24.12, while FNTTF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.37, whereas FNTTF's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to FNTTF's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is more volatile compared to FNTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs VRTK Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 15B. In comparison, VRTK has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $24.12, while VRTK trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.37, whereas VRTK's P/E ratio is 20.50. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to VRTK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is less volatile compared to VRTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs TKSTF Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 15B. In comparison, TKSTF has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $24.12, while TKSTF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.37, whereas TKSTF's P/E ratio is -4.10. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TKSTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is more volatile compared to TKSTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs YRLLF Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 15B. In comparison, YRLLF has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $24.12, while YRLLF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.37, whereas YRLLF's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to YRLLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is more volatile compared to YRLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs JLMKF Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 15B. In comparison, JLMKF has a market cap of 919.3K. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $24.12, while JLMKF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.37, whereas JLMKF's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to JLMKF's ROE of -1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is less volatile compared to JLMKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs DDDX Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 15B. In comparison, DDDX has a market cap of 434.6K. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $24.12, while DDDX trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.37, whereas DDDX's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DDDX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is less volatile compared to DDDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs ITOX Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 15B. In comparison, ITOX has a market cap of 392.2K. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $24.12, while ITOX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.37, whereas ITOX's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ITOX's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is less volatile compared to ITOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs DWDZF Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 15B. In comparison, DWDZF has a market cap of 205K. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $24.12, while DWDZF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.37, whereas DWDZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DWDZF's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is less volatile compared to DWDZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs HAUP Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 15B. In comparison, HAUP has a market cap of 123.5K. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $24.12, while HAUP trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.37, whereas HAUP's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to HAUP's ROE of +92.50%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is less volatile compared to HAUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs GOSY Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 15B. In comparison, GOSY has a market cap of 82.5K. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $24.12, while GOSY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.37, whereas GOSY's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to GOSY's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is more volatile compared to GOSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs CRTG Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 15B. In comparison, CRTG has a market cap of 71.9K. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $24.12, while CRTG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.37, whereas CRTG's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CRTG's ROE of +5.53%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is more volatile compared to CRTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs RDRSF Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 15B. In comparison, RDRSF has a market cap of 17.7K. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $24.12, while RDRSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.37, whereas RDRSF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to RDRSF's ROE of +2.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is less volatile compared to RDRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs MDEA Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 15B. In comparison, MDEA has a market cap of 13.2K. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $24.12, while MDEA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.37, whereas MDEA's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MDEA's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is less volatile compared to MDEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs SNIOF Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 15B. In comparison, SNIOF has a market cap of 11.3K. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $24.12, while SNIOF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.37, whereas SNIOF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SNIOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is less volatile compared to SNIOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs NADA Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 15B. In comparison, NADA has a market cap of 10.4K. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $24.12, while NADA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.37, whereas NADA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NADA's ROE of -8.82%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is less volatile compared to NADA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs VMRI Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 15B. In comparison, VMRI has a market cap of 7K. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $24.12, while VMRI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.37, whereas VMRI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to VMRI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is more volatile compared to VMRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs EUOT Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 15B. In comparison, EUOT has a market cap of 4.8K. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $24.12, while EUOT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.37, whereas EUOT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to EUOT's ROE of +28.93%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is less volatile compared to EUOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs CBEX Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 15B. In comparison, CBEX has a market cap of 2.3K. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $24.12, while CBEX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.37, whereas CBEX's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CBEX's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is more volatile compared to CBEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs VIDE Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 15B. In comparison, VIDE has a market cap of 1.8K. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $24.12, while VIDE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.37, whereas VIDE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to VIDE's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is less volatile compared to VIDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs MCZAF Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 15B. In comparison, MCZAF has a market cap of 735. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $24.12, while MCZAF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.37, whereas MCZAF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MCZAF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is less volatile compared to MCZAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs SOSO Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 15B. In comparison, SOSO has a market cap of 389. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $24.12, while SOSO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.37, whereas SOSO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SOSO's ROE of -1.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is less volatile compared to SOSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs VOIS Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 15B. In comparison, VOIS has a market cap of 89. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $24.12, while VOIS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.37, whereas VOIS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to VOIS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is less volatile compared to VOIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs IWRS Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 15B. In comparison, IWRS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $24.12, while IWRS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.37, whereas IWRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to IWRS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is less volatile compared to IWRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.