Lenovo Group Limited
Lenovo Group Limited LNVGY Peers
See (LNVGY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Computer Hardware Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LNVGY | $26.02 | -0.65% | 16.26B | 13.91 | $1.87 | +3.69% |
| QUCCF | $12.25 | -15.58% | 295.12B | 10.21 | $1.20 | N/A |
| CAJPY | $32.22 | -0.19% | 29.96B | 28.02 | $1.15 | +2.81% |
| CAJFF | $32.40 | -2.67% | 29.95B | 28.17 | $1.15 | +2.92% |
| LNVGF | $1.30 | +0.80% | 16.07B | 14.39 | $0.09 | +3.84% |
| ASUUY | $98.69 | N/A | 14.66B | 13.73 | $7.19 | +2.62% |
| SEKEY | $6.86 | +0.29% | 4.45B | 11.63 | $0.59 | +3.04% |
| SEKEF | $12.95 | -22.92% | 4.15B | 11.07 | $1.17 | +3.88% |
| ACEYY | $5.14 | N/A | 3.41B | 34.27 | $0.15 | +0.15% |
| FXCOF | $1.76 | N/A | 2.49B | 17.60 | $0.10 | +2.63% |
Stock Comparison
LNVGY vs QUCCF Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 16.26B. In comparison, QUCCF has a market cap of 295.12B. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $26.02, while QUCCF trades at $12.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.91, whereas QUCCF's P/E ratio is 10.21. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to QUCCF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is less volatile compared to QUCCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs CAJPY Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 16.26B. In comparison, CAJPY has a market cap of 29.96B. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $26.02, while CAJPY trades at $32.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.91, whereas CAJPY's P/E ratio is 28.02. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CAJPY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is more volatile compared to CAJPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs CAJFF Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 16.26B. In comparison, CAJFF has a market cap of 29.95B. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $26.02, while CAJFF trades at $32.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.91, whereas CAJFF's P/E ratio is 28.17. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CAJFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is more volatile compared to CAJFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs LNVGF Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 16.26B. In comparison, LNVGF has a market cap of 16.07B. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $26.02, while LNVGF trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.91, whereas LNVGF's P/E ratio is 14.39. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to LNVGF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is less volatile compared to LNVGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs ASUUY Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 16.26B. In comparison, ASUUY has a market cap of 14.66B. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $26.02, while ASUUY trades at $98.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.91, whereas ASUUY's P/E ratio is 13.73. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ASUUY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is more volatile compared to ASUUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs SEKEY Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 16.26B. In comparison, SEKEY has a market cap of 4.45B. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $26.02, while SEKEY trades at $6.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.91, whereas SEKEY's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SEKEY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is less volatile compared to SEKEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs SEKEF Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 16.26B. In comparison, SEKEF has a market cap of 4.15B. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $26.02, while SEKEF trades at $12.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.91, whereas SEKEF's P/E ratio is 11.07. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SEKEF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is less volatile compared to SEKEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs ACEYY Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 16.26B. In comparison, ACEYY has a market cap of 3.41B. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $26.02, while ACEYY trades at $5.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.91, whereas ACEYY's P/E ratio is 34.27. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ACEYY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is less volatile compared to ACEYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs FXCOF Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 16.26B. In comparison, FXCOF has a market cap of 2.49B. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $26.02, while FXCOF trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.91, whereas FXCOF's P/E ratio is 17.60. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to FXCOF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is more volatile compared to FXCOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs TSHTY Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 16.26B. In comparison, TSHTY has a market cap of 2.06B. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $26.02, while TSHTY trades at $9.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.91, whereas TSHTY's P/E ratio is 4.22. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TSHTY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is less volatile compared to TSHTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs LGNRF Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 16.26B. In comparison, LGNRF has a market cap of 1.64B. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $26.02, while LGNRF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.91, whereas LGNRF's P/E ratio is -2.79. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to LGNRF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is more volatile compared to LGNRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs DRSHF Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 16.26B. In comparison, DRSHF has a market cap of 760.46M. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $26.02, while DRSHF trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.91, whereas DRSHF's P/E ratio is 87.00. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DRSHF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is less volatile compared to DRSHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs JFEYF Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 16.26B. In comparison, JFEYF has a market cap of 584.79M. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $26.02, while JFEYF trades at $18.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.91, whereas JFEYF's P/E ratio is 9.96. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to JFEYF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is more volatile compared to JFEYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs WACMF Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 16.26B. In comparison, WACMF has a market cap of 566.27M. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $26.02, while WACMF trades at $4.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.91, whereas WACMF's P/E ratio is 16.84. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to WACMF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is less volatile compared to WACMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs WACMY Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 16.26B. In comparison, WACMY has a market cap of 524.60M. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $26.02, while WACMY trades at $3.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.91, whereas WACMY's P/E ratio is 13.96. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to WACMY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is less volatile compared to WACMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs PCPPF Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 16.26B. In comparison, PCPPF has a market cap of 384.03M. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $26.02, while PCPPF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.91, whereas PCPPF's P/E ratio is 8.33. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PCPPF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is less volatile compared to PCPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs AOMUF Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 16.26B. In comparison, AOMUF has a market cap of 153.76M. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $26.02, while AOMUF trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.91, whereas AOMUF's P/E ratio is -10.62. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to AOMUF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is more volatile compared to AOMUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs SCTQ Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 16.26B. In comparison, SCTQ has a market cap of 98.07M. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $26.02, while SCTQ trades at $2.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.91, whereas SCTQ's P/E ratio is 15.64. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SCTQ's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is more volatile compared to SCTQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs FRIIF Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 16.26B. In comparison, FRIIF has a market cap of 79.44M. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $26.02, while FRIIF trades at $12.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.91, whereas FRIIF's P/E ratio is 6.38. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to FRIIF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is less volatile compared to FRIIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs XAARF Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 16.26B. In comparison, XAARF has a market cap of 76.54M. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $26.02, while XAARF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.91, whereas XAARF's P/E ratio is -5.37. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to XAARF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is less volatile compared to XAARF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs TBIIF Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 16.26B. In comparison, TBIIF has a market cap of 70.69M. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $26.02, while TBIIF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.91, whereas TBIIF's P/E ratio is -3.36. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TBIIF's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is more volatile compared to TBIIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs CREAF Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 16.26B. In comparison, CREAF has a market cap of 47.87M. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $26.02, while CREAF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.91, whereas CREAF's P/E ratio is -3.78. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CREAF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is less volatile compared to CREAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs TAKOF Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 16.26B. In comparison, TAKOF has a market cap of 45.58M. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $26.02, while TAKOF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.91, whereas TAKOF's P/E ratio is -3.21. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TAKOF's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is less volatile compared to TAKOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs AOTOF Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 16.26B. In comparison, AOTOF has a market cap of 33.07M. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $26.02, while AOTOF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.91, whereas AOTOF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to AOTOF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is more volatile compared to AOTOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs PRWYF Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 16.26B. In comparison, PRWYF has a market cap of 31.02M. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $26.02, while PRWYF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.91, whereas PRWYF's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PRWYF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is less volatile compared to PRWYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs AITX Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 16.26B. In comparison, AITX has a market cap of 24.09M. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $26.02, while AITX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.91, whereas AITX's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to AITX's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is less volatile compared to AITX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs EVRC Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 16.26B. In comparison, EVRC has a market cap of 9.76M. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $26.02, while EVRC trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.91, whereas EVRC's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to EVRC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is more volatile compared to EVRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs CCUR Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 16.26B. In comparison, CCUR has a market cap of 5.53M. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $26.02, while CCUR trades at $1,876.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.91, whereas CCUR's P/E ratio is -4.69. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CCUR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is less volatile compared to CCUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs VIDE Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 16.26B. In comparison, VIDE has a market cap of 4.70M. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $26.02, while VIDE trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.91, whereas VIDE's P/E ratio is -40.00. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to VIDE's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is more volatile compared to VIDE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs VRTK Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 16.26B. In comparison, VRTK has a market cap of 3.49M. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $26.02, while VRTK trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.91, whereas VRTK's P/E ratio is 18.20. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to VRTK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is more volatile compared to VRTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs FNTTF Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 16.26B. In comparison, FNTTF has a market cap of 2.57M. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $26.02, while FNTTF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.91, whereas FNTTF's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to FNTTF's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is less volatile compared to FNTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs TKSTF Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 16.26B. In comparison, TKSTF has a market cap of 2.04M. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $26.02, while TKSTF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.91, whereas TKSTF's P/E ratio is -4.10. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TKSTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is more volatile compared to TKSTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs JLMKF Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 16.26B. In comparison, JLMKF has a market cap of 919322.00. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $26.02, while JLMKF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.91, whereas JLMKF's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to JLMKF's ROE of -1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is more volatile compared to JLMKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs YRLLF Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 16.26B. In comparison, YRLLF has a market cap of 632116.00. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $26.02, while YRLLF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.91, whereas YRLLF's P/E ratio is -3.37. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to YRLLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is less volatile compared to YRLLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs ITOX Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 16.26B. In comparison, ITOX has a market cap of 532299.00. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $26.02, while ITOX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.91, whereas ITOX's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ITOX's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is less volatile compared to ITOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs DDDX Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 16.26B. In comparison, DDDX has a market cap of 523275.00. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $26.02, while DDDX trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.91, whereas DDDX's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DDDX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is less volatile compared to DDDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs CRTG Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 16.26B. In comparison, CRTG has a market cap of 215843.00. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $26.02, while CRTG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.91, whereas CRTG's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CRTG's ROE of +5.53%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is less volatile compared to CRTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs DWDZF Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 16.26B. In comparison, DWDZF has a market cap of 204960.00. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $26.02, while DWDZF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.91, whereas DWDZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DWDZF's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is less volatile compared to DWDZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs HAUP Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 16.26B. In comparison, HAUP has a market cap of 123488.00. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $26.02, while HAUP trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.91, whereas HAUP's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to HAUP's ROE of +92.50%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is more volatile compared to HAUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs GOSY Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 16.26B. In comparison, GOSY has a market cap of 82500.00. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $26.02, while GOSY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.91, whereas GOSY's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to GOSY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is more volatile compared to GOSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs EUOT Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 16.26B. In comparison, EUOT has a market cap of 47963.00. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $26.02, while EUOT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.91, whereas EUOT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to EUOT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is less volatile compared to EUOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs RDRSF Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 16.26B. In comparison, RDRSF has a market cap of 17721.00. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $26.02, while RDRSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.91, whereas RDRSF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to RDRSF's ROE of +2.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is less volatile compared to RDRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs MDEA Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 16.26B. In comparison, MDEA has a market cap of 13196.00. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $26.02, while MDEA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.91, whereas MDEA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MDEA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is less volatile compared to MDEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs SNIOF Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 16.26B. In comparison, SNIOF has a market cap of 11252.00. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $26.02, while SNIOF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.91, whereas SNIOF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SNIOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is less volatile compared to SNIOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs NADA Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 16.26B. In comparison, NADA has a market cap of 10437.00. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $26.02, while NADA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.91, whereas NADA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NADA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is less volatile compared to NADA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs VMRI Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 16.26B. In comparison, VMRI has a market cap of 6957.00. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $26.02, while VMRI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.91, whereas VMRI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to VMRI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is less volatile compared to VMRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs CBEX Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 16.26B. In comparison, CBEX has a market cap of 2343.00. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $26.02, while CBEX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.91, whereas CBEX's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CBEX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is more volatile compared to CBEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs VOIS Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 16.26B. In comparison, VOIS has a market cap of 1777.00. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $26.02, while VOIS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.91, whereas VOIS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to VOIS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is less volatile compared to VOIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs MCZAF Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 16.26B. In comparison, MCZAF has a market cap of 735.00. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $26.02, while MCZAF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.91, whereas MCZAF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MCZAF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is less volatile compared to MCZAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.
LNVGY vs SOSO Comparison
LNVGY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNVGY stands at 16.26B. In comparison, SOSO has a market cap of 389.00. Regarding current trading prices, LNVGY is priced at $26.02, while SOSO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNVGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.91, whereas SOSO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LNVGY's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SOSO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LNVGY is less volatile compared to SOSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNVGY.