Canon Inc.
Canon Inc. (CAJPY) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CAJPY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Computer Hardware Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAJPY | $26.44 | +0.95% | 22.8B | 11.20 | $2.34 | +3.16% |
| QUCCF | $12.25 | +0.00% | 47.2B | 10.21 | $1.20 | +18.07% |
| CAJFF | $26.49 | -1.16% | 23B | 11.32 | $2.34 | +4.02% |
| LNVGY | $33.38 | -3.05% | 20.5B | 13.68 | $2.42 | +2.96% |
| LNVGF | $1.65 | -2.34% | 20B | 13.42 | $0.12 | +3.06% |
| ASUUY | $80.00 | +0.00% | 11.9B | 8.42 | $9.50 | +7.21% |
| SEKEY | $7.83 | +1.03% | 5B | 43.61 | $0.18 | +4.55% |
| SEKEF | $13.00 | +0.00% | 4.2B | 12.87 | $1.01 | +3.71% |
| ACEYY | $5.14 | +0.00% | 3.1B | 34.27 | $0.15 | +5.02% |
| LGNRF | $1.13 | +0.00% | 2.7B | -4.52 | -$0.25 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CAJPY vs QUCCF Comparison May 2026
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 22.8B. In comparison, QUCCF has a market cap of 47.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $26.44, while QUCCF trades at $12.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas QUCCF's P/E ratio is 10.21. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to QUCCF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to QUCCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check QUCCF's competition here
CAJPY vs CAJFF Comparison May 2026
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 22.8B. In comparison, CAJFF has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $26.44, while CAJFF trades at $26.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas CAJFF's P/E ratio is 11.32. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CAJFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to CAJFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check CAJFF's competition here
CAJPY vs LNVGY Comparison May 2026
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 22.8B. In comparison, LNVGY has a market cap of 20.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $26.44, while LNVGY trades at $33.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas LNVGY's P/E ratio is 13.68. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LNVGY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to LNVGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check LNVGY's competition here
CAJPY vs LNVGF Comparison May 2026
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 22.8B. In comparison, LNVGF has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $26.44, while LNVGF trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas LNVGF's P/E ratio is 13.42. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LNVGF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is more volatile compared to LNVGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check LNVGF's competition here
CAJPY vs ASUUY Comparison May 2026
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 22.8B. In comparison, ASUUY has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $26.44, while ASUUY trades at $80.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas ASUUY's P/E ratio is 8.42. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ASUUY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is more volatile compared to ASUUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check ASUUY's competition here
CAJPY vs SEKEY Comparison May 2026
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 22.8B. In comparison, SEKEY has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $26.44, while SEKEY trades at $7.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas SEKEY's P/E ratio is 43.61. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SEKEY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is more volatile compared to SEKEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check SEKEY's competition here
CAJPY vs SEKEF Comparison May 2026
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 22.8B. In comparison, SEKEF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $26.44, while SEKEF trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas SEKEF's P/E ratio is 12.87. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SEKEF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is more volatile compared to SEKEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check SEKEF's competition here
CAJPY vs ACEYY Comparison May 2026
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 22.8B. In comparison, ACEYY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $26.44, while ACEYY trades at $5.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas ACEYY's P/E ratio is 34.27. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ACEYY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to ACEYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check ACEYY's competition here
CAJPY vs LGNRF Comparison May 2026
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 22.8B. In comparison, LGNRF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $26.44, while LGNRF trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas LGNRF's P/E ratio is -4.52. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LGNRF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to LGNRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check LGNRF's competition here
CAJPY vs FXCOF Comparison May 2026
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 22.8B. In comparison, FXCOF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $26.44, while FXCOF trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas FXCOF's P/E ratio is 17.60. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FXCOF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is more volatile compared to FXCOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check FXCOF's competition here
CAJPY vs DRSHF Comparison May 2026
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 22.8B. In comparison, DRSHF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $26.44, while DRSHF trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas DRSHF's P/E ratio is 228.00. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DRSHF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is more volatile compared to DRSHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check DRSHF's competition here
CAJPY vs TSHTY Comparison May 2026
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 22.8B. In comparison, TSHTY has a market cap of 943.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $26.44, while TSHTY trades at $8.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas TSHTY's P/E ratio is -63.61. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TSHTY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to TSHTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check TSHTY's competition here
CAJPY vs WACMF Comparison May 2026
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 22.8B. In comparison, WACMF has a market cap of 729.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $26.44, while WACMF trades at $5.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas WACMF's P/E ratio is 12.04. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WACMF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to WACMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check WACMF's competition here
CAJPY vs WACMY Comparison May 2026
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 22.8B. In comparison, WACMY has a market cap of 639.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $26.44, while WACMY trades at $4.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas WACMY's P/E ratio is 16.96. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WACMY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is more volatile compared to WACMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check WACMY's competition here
CAJPY vs JFEYF Comparison May 2026
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 22.8B. In comparison, JFEYF has a market cap of 407.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $26.44, while JFEYF trades at $12.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas JFEYF's P/E ratio is 11.58. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JFEYF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to JFEYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check JFEYF's competition here
CAJPY vs PCPPF Comparison May 2026
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 22.8B. In comparison, PCPPF has a market cap of 384M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $26.44, while PCPPF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas PCPPF's P/E ratio is 8.33. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PCPPF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to PCPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check PCPPF's competition here
CAJPY vs TAKOF Comparison May 2026
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 22.8B. In comparison, TAKOF has a market cap of 342.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $26.44, while TAKOF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas TAKOF's P/E ratio is -16.97. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TAKOF's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to TAKOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check TAKOF's competition here
CAJPY vs AOMUF Comparison May 2026
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 22.8B. In comparison, AOMUF has a market cap of 153.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $26.44, while AOMUF trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas AOMUF's P/E ratio is -10.62. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AOMUF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is more volatile compared to AOMUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check AOMUF's competition here
CAJPY vs SCTQ Comparison May 2026
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 22.8B. In comparison, SCTQ has a market cap of 101.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $26.44, while SCTQ trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas SCTQ's P/E ratio is 5.20. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SCTQ's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is more volatile compared to SCTQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check SCTQ's competition here
CAJPY vs FRIIF Comparison May 2026
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 22.8B. In comparison, FRIIF has a market cap of 78.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $26.44, while FRIIF trades at $12.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas FRIIF's P/E ratio is 6.10. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FRIIF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is more volatile compared to FRIIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check FRIIF's competition here
CAJPY vs XAARF Comparison May 2026
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 22.8B. In comparison, XAARF has a market cap of 72.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $26.44, while XAARF trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas XAARF's P/E ratio is -5.11. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to XAARF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to XAARF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check XAARF's competition here
CAJPY vs TBIIF Comparison May 2026
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 22.8B. In comparison, TBIIF has a market cap of 63.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $26.44, while TBIIF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas TBIIF's P/E ratio is -2.70. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TBIIF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to TBIIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check TBIIF's competition here
CAJPY vs CREAF Comparison May 2026
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 22.8B. In comparison, CREAF has a market cap of 48.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $26.44, while CREAF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas CREAF's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CREAF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is more volatile compared to CREAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check CREAF's competition here
CAJPY vs PRWYF Comparison May 2026
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 22.8B. In comparison, PRWYF has a market cap of 34.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $26.44, while PRWYF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas PRWYF's P/E ratio is -22.67. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PRWYF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to PRWYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check PRWYF's competition here
CAJPY vs AOTOF Comparison May 2026
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 22.8B. In comparison, AOTOF has a market cap of 33.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $26.44, while AOTOF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas AOTOF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AOTOF's ROE of -4.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is more volatile compared to AOTOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check AOTOF's competition here
CAJPY vs EVRC Comparison May 2026
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 22.8B. In comparison, EVRC has a market cap of 11.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $26.44, while EVRC trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas EVRC's P/E ratio is 11.67. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EVRC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is more volatile compared to EVRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check EVRC's competition here
CAJPY vs AITX Comparison May 2026
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 22.8B. In comparison, AITX has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $26.44, while AITX trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas AITX's P/E ratio is -6.35. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AITX's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to AITX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check AITX's competition here
CAJPY vs CCUR Comparison May 2026
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 22.8B. In comparison, CCUR has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $26.44, while CCUR trades at $2,310.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas CCUR's P/E ratio is -4.69. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CCUR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to CCUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check CCUR's competition here
CAJPY vs FNTTF Comparison May 2026
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 22.8B. In comparison, FNTTF has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $26.44, while FNTTF trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas FNTTF's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FNTTF's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to FNTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check FNTTF's competition here
CAJPY vs VRTK Comparison May 2026
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 22.8B. In comparison, VRTK has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $26.44, while VRTK trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas VRTK's P/E ratio is 20.50. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VRTK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to VRTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check VRTK's competition here
CAJPY vs CRTG Comparison May 2026
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 22.8B. In comparison, CRTG has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $26.44, while CRTG trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas CRTG's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CRTG's ROE of -2.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is more volatile compared to CRTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check CRTG's competition here
CAJPY vs TKSTF Comparison May 2026
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 22.8B. In comparison, TKSTF has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $26.44, while TKSTF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas TKSTF's P/E ratio is -4.10. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TKSTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is more volatile compared to TKSTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check TKSTF's competition here
CAJPY vs JLMKF Comparison May 2026
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 22.8B. In comparison, JLMKF has a market cap of 919.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $26.44, while JLMKF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas JLMKF's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JLMKF's ROE of +1.55%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to JLMKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check JLMKF's competition here
CAJPY vs ITOX Comparison May 2026
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 22.8B. In comparison, ITOX has a market cap of 351.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $26.44, while ITOX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas ITOX's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ITOX's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is more volatile compared to ITOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check ITOX's competition here
CAJPY vs DDDX Comparison May 2026
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 22.8B. In comparison, DDDX has a market cap of 300.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $26.44, while DDDX trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas DDDX's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DDDX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to DDDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check DDDX's competition here
CAJPY vs HAUP Comparison May 2026
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 22.8B. In comparison, HAUP has a market cap of 104.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $26.44, while HAUP trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas HAUP's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HAUP's ROE of +92.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to HAUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check HAUP's competition here
CAJPY vs YRLLF Comparison May 2026
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 22.8B. In comparison, YRLLF has a market cap of 103.6K. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $26.44, while YRLLF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas YRLLF's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to YRLLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to YRLLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check YRLLF's competition here
CAJPY vs GOSY Comparison May 2026
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 22.8B. In comparison, GOSY has a market cap of 82.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $26.44, while GOSY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas GOSY's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GOSY's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is more volatile compared to GOSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check GOSY's competition here
CAJPY vs EUOT Comparison May 2026
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 22.8B. In comparison, EUOT has a market cap of 48K. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $26.44, while EUOT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas EUOT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EUOT's ROE of +28.93%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to EUOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check EUOT's competition here
CAJPY vs RDRSF Comparison May 2026
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 22.8B. In comparison, RDRSF has a market cap of 17.7K. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $26.44, while RDRSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas RDRSF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RDRSF's ROE of +2.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to RDRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check RDRSF's competition here
CAJPY vs MDEA Comparison May 2026
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 22.8B. In comparison, MDEA has a market cap of 13.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $26.44, while MDEA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas MDEA's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MDEA's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to MDEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check MDEA's competition here
CAJPY vs SNIOF Comparison May 2026
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 22.8B. In comparison, SNIOF has a market cap of 11.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $26.44, while SNIOF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas SNIOF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SNIOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to SNIOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check SNIOF's competition here
CAJPY vs NADA Comparison May 2026
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 22.8B. In comparison, NADA has a market cap of 9.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $26.44, while NADA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas NADA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NADA's ROE of -8.82%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to NADA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check NADA's competition here
CAJPY vs VOIS Comparison May 2026
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 22.8B. In comparison, VOIS has a market cap of 8.9K. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $26.44, while VOIS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas VOIS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VOIS's ROE of +2.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to VOIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check VOIS's competition here
CAJPY vs VMRI Comparison May 2026
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 22.8B. In comparison, VMRI has a market cap of 7K. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $26.44, while VMRI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas VMRI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VMRI's ROE of -16.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is more volatile compared to VMRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check VMRI's competition here
CAJPY vs CBEX Comparison May 2026
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 22.8B. In comparison, CBEX has a market cap of 2.4K. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $26.44, while CBEX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas CBEX's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CBEX's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is more volatile compared to CBEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check CBEX's competition here
CAJPY vs MCZAF Comparison May 2026
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 22.8B. In comparison, MCZAF has a market cap of 735. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $26.44, while MCZAF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas MCZAF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MCZAF's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to MCZAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check MCZAF's competition here
CAJPY vs VIDE Comparison May 2026
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 22.8B. In comparison, VIDE has a market cap of 588. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $26.44, while VIDE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas VIDE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VIDE's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to VIDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check VIDE's competition here
CAJPY vs SOSO Comparison May 2026
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 22.8B. In comparison, SOSO has a market cap of 374. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $26.44, while SOSO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas SOSO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SOSO's ROE of -1.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to SOSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check SOSO's competition here
CAJPY vs DWDZF Comparison May 2026
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 22.8B. In comparison, DWDZF has a market cap of 224. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $26.44, while DWDZF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas DWDZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DWDZF's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to DWDZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check DWDZF's competition here
CAJPY vs ORYX Comparison May 2026
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 22.8B. In comparison, ORYX has a market cap of 2. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $26.44, while ORYX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas ORYX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ORYX's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is more volatile compared to ORYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check ORYX's competition here
CAJPY vs IWRS Comparison May 2026
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 22.8B. In comparison, IWRS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $26.44, while IWRS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas IWRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IWRS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to IWRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check IWRS's competition here